The significance of surgical staging in intermediate-risk endometrial cancer

An Overview of Endometrial Cancer with Novel Therapeutic Strategies

Endometrial cancer (EC) stands as the most prevalent gynecologic malignancy. In the past, it was classified based on its hormone sensitivity. However, The Cancer Genome Atlas has categorized EC into four groups, which offers a more objective and reproducible classification and has been shown to have prognostic and therapeutic implications. Hormonally driven EC arises from a precursor lesion known as endometrial hyperplasia, resulting from unopposed estrogen. EC is usually diagnosed through biopsy, followed by surgical staging unless advanced disease is expected. The typical staging consists of a hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy and sentinel lymph node biopsies, with a preference placed on a minimally invasive approach. The stage of the disease is the most significant prognostic marker. However, factors such as age, histology, grade, myometrial invasion, lymphovascular space invasion, tumor size, peritoneal cytology, hormone receptor status, ploidy and markers, body mass index, and the therapy received all contribute to the prognosis. Treatment is tailored based on the stage and the risk of recurrence. Radiotherapy is primarily used in the early stages, and chemotherapy can be added if high-grade histology or advanced-stage disease is present. The risk of EC recurrence increases with advances in stage. Among the recurrences, vaginal cases exhibit the most favorable response to treatment, typically for radiotherapy. Conversely, the treatment of widespread recurrence is currently palliative and is best managed with chemotherapy or hormonal agents. Most recently, immunotherapy has emerged as a promising treatment for advanced and recurrent EC.

Treatment strategies for endometrial cancer: current practice and perspective

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Endometrial cancer incidence is increasing in North America and is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in women. We review recent literature published on treatment of endometrial cancer and highlight areas of active interest.

RECENT FINDINGS

There has been movement toward minimal invasive surgery at diagnosis; lymph node staging remains controversial and continues to be investigated. Progress has been made to establish consensus on endometrial cancer risk classification to promote consistency for future trial design. Molecular characterization of endometrial cancer and its integration into clinicopathological profiling to develop predictive biomarkers for treatment selection are active areas of research. Optimal adjuvant treatment strategy in high-risk endometrial cancer remains to be defined with recognition of treatment-related toxicity. Despite encouraging results in drug development for treatment of advanced/recurrent endometrial cancer, no targeted therapies beyond hormonal therapy are approved. There is an urgent need for scientifically validated therapy with predictive biomarkers.

SUMMARY

Our understanding of endometrial cancer has evolved through improvements in molecular biology, allowing improved definition of target-specific therapies. The precise role and sequence of conventional and targeted therapies, including immunotherapy, will require careful attention to the design of clinical trials with translational emphasis to allow the discovery, validation, and implementation of predictive biomarkers into clinical care.

Improving survival after endometrial cancer: the big picture

To improve survival in women with endometrial cancer, we need to look at the "big picture" beyond initial treatment. Although the majority of women will be diagnosed with early stage disease and are cured with surgery alone, there is a subgroup of women with advanced and high-risk early stage disease whose life expectancy may be prolonged with the addition of chemotherapy. Immunohistochemistry will help to identify those women with Lynch syndrome who will benefit from more frequent colorectal cancer surveillance and genetic counseling. If they happen to be diagnosed with colorectal cancer, this information has an important therapeutic implication. And finally, because the majority of women will survive their diagnosis of endometrial cancer, they remain at risk for breast and colorectal cancer, so these women should be counselled about screening for these cancers. These three interventions will contribute to improving the overall survival of women with endometrial cancer.

Nationwide analysis on surgical procedures for patients with endometrial cancer in Germany: results of the AGO pattern of care studies from the years 2013, 2009, and 2006

PURPOSE

In 2013, 2009, and 2006, the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynäkologische Onkologie evaluated the therapeutic approaches and the adherence to their guidelines for endometrial carcinoma (EC) in Germany. Here, we present the results concerning the surgical procedures.

METHODS

A questionnaire was developed and sent to 682 German gynecological departments in 2013 (775 in 2009 and 500 in 2006). The results were compared with the recommendations of the guideline and with each other.

RESULTS

Responses were available in 40.0 % in 2013, 33.3 % in 2009, and 35.8 % in 2006, respectively. Pelvic lymphadenectomy (LAN) was performed in accordance with the guidelines with some exceptions in 2013, 2009, and 2006, whereas paraaortic LAN was performed in accordance with the guideline only in 2009. Histological high-risk subtypes of EC received pelvic and paraaortic LAN in 2013, 2009, and 2006 in accordance with the guidelines with small exceptions. LAN for Patients, who were postoperatively upstaged or upgraded, was not conducted in accordance with the guidelines in 2013, 2009, and 2006. In 2013, 84.6 % of the participants offered the laparoscopic approach (LSA) for hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, 63.3 % for pelvic LAN, and 49.1 % for paraaortic LAN, respectively. More participants offered the LSA in 2013 compared to 2009 and 2006 (p values <0.014).

CONCLUSIONS

The paraaortic LAN, the LSA as well as the second operation on patients who had postoperatively been upstaged were not conducted in accordance with the guideline [CORRECTED]. Improvements concerning surgical treatment are possible and might lead to higher survival rates and a reduction of morbidity in patients with EC in Germany.

The pattern of myometrial invasion as a predictor of lymph node metastasis or extrauterine disease in low-grade endometrial carcinoma

The purpose of this study was to examine predictors of lymph node (LN) metastases or extrauterine disease (ED) in low-grade (FIGO grade 1 or 2) endometrioid carcinoma (LGEC) in a multi-institutional setting. For LGEC with and without LN metastasis or ED, each of the 9 participating institutions evaluated patients' age, tumor size, myometrial invasion (MI), FIGO grade, % solid component, the presence or absence of papillary architecture, microcystic, elongated, and fragmented glands (MELF), single-cell/cell-cluster invasion (SCI), lymphovascular invasion (LVI), lower uterine segment (LUS) and cervical stromal (CX) involvement, and numbers of pelvic and para-aortic LNs sampled. A total of 304 cases were reviewed: LN(+) or ED(+), 96; LN(-)/ED(-), 208. Patients' ages ranged from 23 to 91 years (median 61 y). Table 1 summarizes the histopathologic variables that were noted for the LN(+) or ED(+) group: tumor size ≥2 cm, 93/96 (97%); MI>50%, 54/96 (56%); MELF, 67/96 (70%); SCI, 33/96 (34%); LVI, 79/96 (82%); >20% solid, 65/96 (68%); papillary architecture present, 68/96 (72%); LUS involved, 64/96 (67%); and CX involved, 41/96 (43%). For the LN(-)/ED(-) group, the results were as follows: tumor size ≥2 cm, 152/208 (73%); MI>50%, 56/208 (27%); MELF, 79/208 (38%); SCI, 19/208 (9%); LVI, 56/208 (27%); >20% solid, 160/208 (77%); papillary architecture present, 122/208 (59%); LUS involved, 77/208 (37%); CX involved, 24/208 (12%). There was no evidence of a difference in the number of pelvic or para-aortic LNs sampled between groups (P=0.9 and 0.1, respectively). After multivariate analysis, the depth of MI, CX involvement, LVI, and SCI emerged as significant predictors of advanced-stage disease. Although univariate analysis pointed to LUS involvement, MELF pattern of invasion, and papillary architecture as possible predictors of advanced-stage disease, these were not shown to be significant by multivariate analysis. This study validates MI, CX involvement, and LVI as significant predictors of LN(+) or ED(+). The association of SCI pattern with advanced-stage LGEC is a novel finding.

Comparison of prognosis in patients with endometrioid endometrial cancer staged IB in FIGO 1988 and 2009 classifications

PURPOSE

Since 2009 the new FIGO Staging System of endometrial cancer, which changed the previous FIGO 1988 Staging System, has been in use. The aim of the study was to compare prognosis in patients with endometrioid endometrial cancer at stage IB of the 2009 FIGO Staging System and of the 1988 FIGO Staging System.

METHODS

We analyzed 173 patients: 108 patients (group A) at stage IB in FIGO 1988 Staging System, and 68 patients (group B) at stage IB in FIGO 2009 Staging System from 262 consecutive endometrioid endometrial cancer patients. The disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared between these groups.

RESULTS

The DFS rate was 96.3 % in group A and it was 87.7 % in group B (p = 0.029). Relapses were observed in 12 patients (6.4 %) from 6 to 57 months (mean 28.1; SD = 14.6) after initial surgery, and occurred in four patients from group A (3.7 %) and eight patients from group B (12.3 %) (p = 0.032). The OS rate was 94.4 % in group A and it was 83.1 % in group B (p = 0.018). During follow-up, 17 patients (9.8 %) died: six patients from group A (5.6 %), and 11 patients from group B (16.9 %).

CONCLUSIONS

Stage IB in FIGO 2009 Staging System is associated with worse prognosis compared to stage IB according to FIGO 1988 classification. There seems to be a need to use exclusively the new FIGO 2009 classification worldwide to avoid therapeutic mistakes, which can be caused by diverse nomenclature.

[Sentinel node procedure and endometrial cancer: senti-endo results]

Based on two randomized trials and a meta-analysis, the recommendations of the National Cancer Institute (INCa) have validated the absence of systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy for patients with endometrial cancer at low risk (type 1 histology stage IA grade 1-2) and intermediate (type 1 histology stage IA grade 3 and IB grade 1-2) but without taking into account the contribution of the sentinel node (SN) procedure. The senti-endo trial assessing the role of the SN procedure in patients with early stages endometrial cancer showed that the detection rate by hemi-pelvis right and left were 77 and 76%, respectively. The detection rate per patient was 89%. Among patients with at least a SN detected, the detection was unilateral in 34 cases (31%) and bilateral in 77 cases (69%). Of the 111 patients with at least a SN detected, 19 had lymph node metastases (17%). Considering the hemi-pelvis right and left as a unit, no false negative case was observed, hence the sensitivity and NPV was 100%. Considering the NPV per patient, three false negative cases were observed. Among the 57 patients at low risk, six (11%) had lymph node metastases on SN with negative non sentinel nodes. Of the 33 patients at intermediate risk, five (15%) had lymph node metastases on SN with negative non sentinel nodes. Senti-endo results emphasize the contribution of the SN procedure to assess the nodal status in patients with low or intermediate risk group raising the issue on new definition of the recommendations of INCa.

Endometrial Cancer Patients: A Cohort Previous to Changes in Tumour Behaviour and Treatment Strategies

Nowadays, the incidence of endometrial cancer is rising, especially of high-grade endometrial tumours. Recently, the FIGO classification of endometrial cancer has changed worldwide. Besides that, treatment strategies are changing. The purpose of this study was to analyse the adherence to the national guidelines of cancer treatment and to analyse patterns of disease relapse and survival. We focused on a group of patients () with endometrial cancer, in a time period in which new treatment strategies are not yet completely implemented. Because of multiple upcoming changes in patient characteristics, tumour classification, as well as treatment regimens, a more heterogeneous cohort of patients diagnosed with endometrial cancer will appear. From now on, all those changes will have their effects on the followup of conventional endometrial cancer treatment. In our opinion, it is, therefore, valuable to have the current, more homogenous, cohort clearly described.