Sorafenib as a third line therapy in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer or primary peritoneal cancer: A phase II study

A targetable OSGIN1 - AMPK - SLC2A3 axis controls the vulnerability of ovarian cancer to ferroptosis

Despite advances in various chemotherapy regimens, current therapeutic options are limited for ovarian cancer patients. Oxidative stress-induced growth inhibitor 1 (OSGIN1), which is a tumor suppressor gene known to regulate the cellular stress response and apoptosis, is associated with ovarian cancer development. However, the underlying mechanisms involved in ferroptosis regulation have not been elucidated. Thus, this study aimed to investigate the effect and underlying regulatory mechanism of the OSGIN1 gene on ovarian cancer cells. Our results demonstrated that loss of the OSGIN1 gene promoted ovarian cancer growth and conferred resistance to drug-induced ferroptosis. Mechanistically, the loss of OSGIN1 activates AMPK signaling through ATM, leading to the upregulation of SLC2A3, which protects cells from ferroptosis and renders them insensitive to ferroptosis inducers. Notably, an SLC2A3-neutralizing antibody enhances the ferroptosis-inducing and anticancer effects of sorafenib on ovarian cancer patient-derived xenograft tumors. Overall, anti-SLC2A3 therapy is a promising method to improve ovarian cancer treatment by targeting ferroptosis.

The potential of RAS/RAF/MEK/ERK (MAPK) signaling pathway inhibitors in ovarian cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The RAS/RAF/MEK/ERK (MAPK) pathway plays a role in ovarian carcinogenesis. Low-grade serous ovarian carcinoma (LGSOC) frequently harbors activating MAPK mutations. MAPK inhibitors have been used in small subsets of ovarian carcinoma (OC) patients to control tumor growth. Therefore, we performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the effectiveness of MAPK inhibitors in OC patients. We aimed to determine the clinical benefit rate (CBR), the subgroup of MAPK inhibitors with the best CBR and overall response rate (ORR), and the most common adverse events.

METHODS

We conducted a search in PubMed, Embase via Ovid, the Cochrane library and clinicaltrials.gov on studies evaluating the efficacy of single MAPK pathway inhibition with MAPK pathway inhibitors in OC patients. Our primary outcome included the CBR, defined by the proportion of patients with stable disease (SD), complete (CR) and partial response (PR). Secondary outcomes included the ORR (including PR and CR) and grade 3 and 4 adverse events. Meta-analysis was performed using a random-effects model.

RESULTS

We included nine studies with a total of 319 OC patients, for which we determined a pooled CBR of 63% (95%-CI 39-84%, I² = 92%). Combined treatment with Raf- and MEK inhibitors in in BRAF^v600 mutated LGSOC (n = 6) had the greatest efficacy with a CBR of 100% and ORR of 83%. MEK inhibitors had the best efficacy as a single agent. Subgroup analysis by tumor histology demonstrated a significantly higher CBR and ORR in patients with LGSOC, with a pooled CBR and ORR of 87% (95%-CI 81-92%, I² = 0%) and 27% (95%-CI 10-48%, I² = 77%) respectively. Adverse events of grade 3 or higher were reported frequently: 123 in 167 patients.

CONCLUSIONS

MEK inhibitors are the most promising single agents in (LGS)OC. However, dual MAPK pathway inhibition should be considered in patients with a BRAF^v600 mutation, or non-mutated OC with depleted treatment options due indications of higher efficacy and tolerable toxicity profiles.

Anti-angiogenic therapy in ovarian cancer: Current understandings and prospects of precision medicine

Ovarian cancer (OC) remains the most fatal disease of gynecologic malignant tumors. Angiogenesis refers to the development of new vessels from pre-existing ones, which is responsible for supplying nutrients and removing metabolic waste. Although not yet completely understood, tumor vascularization is orchestrated by multiple secreted factors and signaling pathways. The most central proangiogenic signal, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)/VEGFR signaling, is also the primary target of initial clinical anti-angiogenic effort. However, the efficiency of therapy has so far been modest due to the low response rate and rapidly emerging acquiring resistance. This review focused on the current understanding of the in-depth mechanisms of tumor angiogenesis, together with the newest reports of clinical trial outcomes and resistance mechanism of anti-angiogenic agents in OC. We also emphatically summarized and analyzed previously reported biomarkers and predictive models to describe the prospect of precision therapy of anti-angiogenic drugs in OC.

Sorafenib inhibits ovarian cancer cell proliferation and mobility and induces radiosensitivity by targeting the tumor cell epithelial–mesenchymal transition

Sorafenib, a pan-protein kinase inhibitor, inhibits the activity of various kinases (like vascular endothelial growth factor, platelet-derived growth factor, and rapidly accelerated fibrosarcoma) and clinically has been used to treat different human cancers. This study investigated its antitumor activity in ovarian cancer and the underlying molecular events. To achieve that, ovarian cancer SKOV-3 cells were treated with or without sorafenib (10 µM), transforming growth factor (TGF)-β1 (10 ng/mL), sorafenib (10 µM) + TGF-β1 (10 ng/mL), and TGF-β1 (10 ng/mL) + Ly2157299 (5 µM), followed by 8-Gy radiation. The cells were then subjected to cell viability, wound healing, Transwell, caspase-3 activity, and western blot assays. TGF-β1 treatment enhanced ovarian cancer cell epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT), whereas sorafenib and a selective TGF-β1 inhibitor Ly2157299 reversed tumor cell EMT, invasion, and expression of EMT markers (E-cadherin and vimentin). Sorafenib and Ly2157299 treatment also significantly reduced the tumor cell viability. Furthermore, both sorafenib and Ly2157299 significantly enhanced ovarian cancer cell radiosensitivity, as assessed by a caspase-3 activity assay. In conclusion, sorafenib inhibited ovarian cancer cell proliferation and mobility and induced tumor cell radiosensitivity. Molecularly, sorafenib could inhibit the TGF-β1-mediated EMT. Future studies will assess sorafenib anti-ovarian cancer activity plus TGF-β1 inhibitors in ovarian cancer in vivo.

Antiangiogenic Strategies in Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: Mechanism, Resistance, and Combination Therapy

Angiogenesis is one of the hallmarks of cancer and plays a crucial role in carcinogenesis and progression of epithelial ovarian cancer. Antiangiogenic agent is the first approved targeted agent in ovarian cancer. Anti-angiogenic agents mainly include agents target VEGF/VEGFR pathway, such as bevacizumab and agents target receptor tyrosine kinase, and non-VEGF/VEGFR targets of angiogenesis. Antiangiogenic agents demonstrate certain effects in ovarian cancer treatment either as monotherapy or combined with chemotherapy. Unfortunately, antiangiogenic agents, such as bevacizumab, integrated into the ovarian cancer treatment paradigm do not increase cures. Thus, the benefits of anti-angiogenic agents must be carefully weighed against the cost and associated toxicities. Antiangiogenic agents drug resistance and short of predictive biomarkers are main obstacles in ovarian cancer treatment. A combination of poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors or immune checkpoint inhibitors might be great strategies to overcome resistance as well as enhance anti-tumor activity of anti-angiogenic drugs. Predictive biomarkers of antiangiogenic agents are in urgent need.

Targeted therapies in gynecological cancers: a comprehensive review of clinical evidence

Advanced and recurrent gynecological cancers are associated with poor prognosis and lack of effective treatment. The developments of the molecular mechanisms on cancer progression provide insight into novel targeted therapies, which are emerging as groundbreaking and promising cancer treatment strategies. In gynecologic malignancies, potential therapeutic targeted agents include antiangiogenic agents, poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors, tumor-intrinsic signaling pathway inhibitors, selective estrogen receptor downregulators, and immune checkpoint inhibitors. In this article, we provide a comprehensive review of the clinical evidence of targeted agents in gynecological cancers and discuss the future implication.

Clinical outcomes and safety of apatinib monotherapy in the treatment of patients with advanced epithelial ovarian carcinoma who progressed after standard regimens and the analysis of the VEGFR2 polymorphism

The aims of the present study were to investigate the clinical outcomes and safety of apatinib monotherapy in the treatment of patients with advanced epithelial ovarian carcinoma (EOC) who have progressed after standard regimens, and to analyze the vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 (VEGFR2) rs2071559 polymorphism. A total of 118 patients with advanced EOC who received apatinib treatment were included in the study. Tumor response was evaluated using progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) time, and safety data were documented. Additionally, peripheral blood and peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC) specimens from the patients with EOC were collected to perform the genotyping of genetic polymorphism and assess the mRNA expression of VEGFR2, respectively. The objective response rate across the 118 patients with advanced EOC was 38.98%, the disease control rate was 63.56%, the median PFS time was 4.65 months and the median OS time was 15.10 months. Regarding the polymorphism analysis, the prevalence of rs2071559 in VEGFR2 among the 118 patients with advanced EOC was recorded as the TT genotype in 72 cases (61.02%), TC genotype in 41 cases (34.75%) and CC genotype in 5 cases (4.23%), and the minor allele frequency of rs2071559 was 0.22. The distribution of the three genotypes was in accordance with the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (P=0.781). TC and CC genotypes were merged in the subsequent analysis. The prognosis analyses suggested that the median PFS time of patients with the TC/CC genotype and the TT genotype was 3.10 and 5.40 months, respectively (P=0.015). Moreover, the median OS time of the two genotypes was 12.60 and 17.50 months, respectively (P=0.009). However, no association was noted between genotype status of the polymorphism and adverse reactions. Additionally, the mRNA expression analysis indicated that the mRNA expression levels of VEGFR2 in PBMC specimens were significantly different between TT and TC/CC genotypes (P<0.001). The present study suggested that the clinical outcomes of patients with advanced EOC, who progressed after standard regimens and received apatinib treatment, might be influenced by the VEGFR2 rs2071559 polymorphism.

Preclinical assessment of the VEGFR inhibitor axitinib as a therapeutic agent for epithelial ovarian cancer

Axitinib, small molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitor, demonstrates anti-cancer activity for various solid tumors. We investigated anti-cancer effect of axitinib in epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). We treated EOC cells (A2780, HeyA8, RMG1, and HeyA8-MDR) with axitinib to evaluate its effects on cell viabilty, apoptosis and migration. Western blots were performed to assess VEGFR2, ERK, and AKT levels, and ELISA and FACS to evaluate apoptosis according to axitinib treatment. In addition, in vivo experiments in xenografts using A2780, RMG1, and HeyA8-MDR cell lines were performed. We repeated the experiment with patient-derived xenograft models (PDX) of EOC. Axitinib significantly inhibited cell survival and migration, and increased apoptosis in EOC cells. The expression of VEGFR2 and phosphorylation of AKT and ERK in A2780, RMG1, and HeyA8 were decreased with axitinib treatment in dose-dependent manner, but not in HeyA8-MDR. In in vivo experiments, axitinib significantly decreased tumor weight in xenograft models of drug-sensitive (A2780), and clear cell carcinoma (RMG1) and PDX models for platinum sensitive EOC compared to control, but was not effective in drug-resistant cell line (HeyA8-MDR) or heavily pretreated refractory PDX model. Axitinib showed significant anti-cancer effects in drug-sensitive or clear cell EOC cells via inhibition of VEGFR signals associated with cell proliferation, apoptosis and migration, but not in drug-resistant cells.

Efficacy And Safety Of Apatinib Treatment In Platinum-Resistant Recurrent Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: A Real World Study

Objective

To evaluate real-world use and outcomes of apatinib treatment in platinum-resistant recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer.

Methods

This is an observational study. Patients with platinum-resistant recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer initiating apatinib treatment from January 2016 to December 2018 were included. The primary end point was progression-free survival. Other end points included overall survival, objective response rate, disease control rate, and toxicity.

Results

A total of 28 platinum-resistant epithelial ovarian cancer patients were enrolled in this study. Thirteen cases received apatinib as maintenance therapy following chemotherapy with a median progression-free survival of 6.0 months and a medium overall survival of 11.0 months. Four patients received apatinib as palliative following chemotherapy with 2 cases in progressive disease and 2 cases in stable disease. Eleven cases received apatinib alone as salvage therapy with a disease control rate of 81.8% and a median progression-free survival of 3.0 months. The most common adverse effects were hand-foot syndrome (53.57%), secondary hypertension (46.43%) and fatigue (14.29%). Five patients discontinued treatment due to grade 3 toxicities and 4 patients required dose reduction because of adverse effects.

Conclusion

Apatinib produced moderate improvements in progression-free survival in patients with platinum-resistant epithelial ovarian cancer both as maintenance therapy following chemotherapy and as single-agent salvage therapy. Our study suggests that apatinib may be effective for women with platinum-resistant recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer.

The rise of genomic profiling in ovarian cancer

INTRODUCTION

Next-generation sequencing and advances in 'omics technology have rapidly increased our understanding of the molecular landscape of epithelial ovarian cancers. Areas covered: Once characterized only by histologic appearance and clinical behavior, we now understand many of the molecular phenotypes that underlie the different ovarian cancer subtypes. While the current approach to treatment involves standard cytotoxic therapies after cytoreductive surgery for all ovarian cancers regardless of histologic or molecular characteristics, focus has shifted beyond a 'one size fits all' approach to ovarian cancer. Expert commentary: Genomic profiling offers potentially 'actionable' opportunities for development of targeted therapies and a more individualized approach to treatment with concomitant improved outcomes and decreased toxicity.

Overcoming platinum resistance in ovarian cancer treatment: from clinical practice to emerging chemical therapies

INTRODUCTION

The objective of this review is to summarize results from clinical trials that tested cytotoxic drugs and target strategies for the treatment of platinum resistant (PR) recurrent ovarian cancer (ROC) with particular attention to Phase III and ongoing trials. Areas covered: Since platinum free interval (PFI) represents the most important predictive factor for response to platinum re-treatment in ROC, non-platinum regimens are conventionally considered the most appropriate approaches. Impressive progress has been made in recent decades, resulting in the identification of most effective cytotoxic agents and in the development of new target strategies. However, the efficacy of most of these drugs for the treatment of PR disease is still limited. Expert opinion: The most favorable benefit for the treatment of PR disease, has been described by the AURELIA trial that showed a 3.3 months increase in progression free survival (PFS) when bevacizumab was combined with non-platinum single agent chemotherapy in bevacizumab-naïve patients. Nevertheless, the use of novel agents is associated to important costs for just little gains in survival. Thus, in our opinion the economic evaluation, such as the incorporation of quality of life into the clinical studies is crucial for the development of future trials for PR-ROC.

Inefficiencies and Patient Burdens in the Development of the Targeted Cancer Drug Sorafenib: A Systematic Review

Failure in cancer drug development exacts heavy burdens on patients and research systems. To investigate inefficiencies and burdens in targeted drug development in cancer, we conducted a systematic review of all prelicensure trials for the anticancer drug, sorafenib (Bayer/Onyx Pharmaceuticals). We searched Embase and MEDLINE databases on October 14, 2014, for prelicensure clinical trials testing sorafenib against cancers. We measured risk by serious adverse event rates, benefit by objective response rates and survival, and trial success by prespecified primary endpoint attainment with acceptable toxicity. The first two clinically useful applications of sorafenib were discovered in the first 2 efficacy trials, after five drug-related deaths (4.6% of 108 total) and 93 total patient-years of involvement (2.4% of 3,928 total). Thereafter, sorafenib was tested in 26 indications and 67 drug combinations, leading to one additional licensure. Drug developers tested 5 indications in over 5 trials each, comprising 56 drug-related deaths (51.8% of 108 total) and 1,155 patient-years (29.4% of 3,928 total) of burden in unsuccessful attempts to discover utility against these malignancies. Overall, 32 Phase II trials (26% of Phase II activity) were duplicative, lacked appropriate follow-up, or were uninformative because of accrual failure, constituting 1,773 patients (15.6% of 11,355 total) participating in prelicensure sorafenib trials. The clinical utility of sorafenib was established early in development, with low burden on patients and resources. However, these early successes were followed by rapid and exhaustive testing against various malignancies and combination regimens, leading to excess patient burden. Our evaluation of sorafenib development suggests many opportunities for reducing costs and unnecessary patient burden in cancer drug development.

The rise of genomic profiling in ovarian cancer

INTRODUCTION

Next-generation sequencing and advances in 'omics technology have rapidly increased our understanding of the molecular landscape of epithelial ovarian cancers. Areas covered: Once characterized only by histologic appearance and clinical behavior, we now understand many of the molecular phenotypes that underlie the different ovarian cancer subtypes. While the current approach to treatment involves standard cytotoxic therapies after cytoreductive surgery for all ovarian cancers regardless of histologic or molecular characteristics, focus has shifted beyond a 'one size fits all' approach to ovarian cancer. Expert commentary: Genomic profiling offers potentially 'actionable' opportunities for development of targeted therapies and a more individualized approach to treatment with concomitant improved outcomes and decreased toxicity.

The rise of genomic profiling in ovarian cancer

INTRODUCTION

Next-generation sequencing and advances in 'omics technology have rapidly increased our understanding of the molecular landscape of epithelial ovarian cancers. Areas covered: Once characterized only by histologic appearance and clinical behavior, we now understand many of the molecular phenotypes that underlie the different ovarian cancer subtypes. While the current approach to treatment involves standard cytotoxic therapies after cytoreductive surgery for all ovarian cancers regardless of histologic or molecular characteristics, focus has shifted beyond a 'one size fits all' approach to ovarian cancer. Expert commentary: Genomic profiling offers potentially 'actionable' opportunities for development of targeted therapies and a more individualized approach to treatment with concomitant improved outcomes and decreased toxicity.

The Emerging Role of Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors in Ovarian Cancer Treatment: A Systematic Review

The present systematic review summarizes current evidence regarding the mechanisms of action, the efficacy, and the adverse effects of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in ovarian cancer patients. Phase II and III clinical trials were sought in the PubMed database and in the Clinical Trials.gov registry through September 30, 2015. Seventy-five clinical trials regarding TKIs targeting mainly vascular endothelial growth factor receptor, epidermal growth factor receptor, platelet-derived growth factor receptor, and sarcoma tyrosine kinase (Src) were yielded. The most promising results were noted with cediranib, nintedanib, and pazopanib. However, drawing universal conclusions about the potential integration of TKIs in ovarian cancer therapy remains elusive. Furthermore, emerging challenges and directions for the future research are critically discussed.

Design and Reporting of Targeted Anticancer Preclinical Studies: A Meta-Analysis of Animal Studies Investigating Sorafenib Antitumor Efficacy

The validity of preclinical studies of candidate therapeutic agents has been questioned given their limited ability to predict their fate in clinical development, including due to design flaws and reporting bias. In this study, we examined this issue in depth by conducting a meta-analysis of animal studies investigating the efficacy of the clinically approved kinase inhibitor, sorafenib. MEDLINE, Embase, and BIOSIS databases were searched for all animal experiments testing tumor volume response to sorafenib monotherapy in any cancer published until April 20, 2012. We estimated effect sizes from experiments assessing changes in tumor volume and conducted subgroup analyses based on prespecified experimental design elements associated with internal, construct, and external validity. The meta-analysis included 97 experiments involving 1,761 animals. We excluded 94 experiments due to inadequate reporting of data. Design elements aimed at reducing internal validity threats were implemented only sporadically, with 66% reporting animal attrition and none reporting blinded outcome assessment or concealed allocation. Anticancer activity against various malignancies was typically tested in only a small number of model systems. Effect sizes were significantly smaller when sorafenib was tested against either a different active agent or combination arm. Trim and fill suggested a 37% overestimation of effect sizes across all malignancies due to publication bias. We detected a moderate dose-response in one clinically approved indication, hepatocellular carcinoma, but not in another approved malignancy, renal cell carcinoma, or when data were pooled across all malignancies tested. In support of other reports, we found that few preclinical cancer studies addressed important internal, construct, and external validity threats, limiting their clinical generalizability. Our findings reinforce the need to improve guidelines for the design and reporting of preclinical cancer studies. Cancer Res; 76(16); 4627-36. ©2016 AACR.

Clinical outcome of treatment with serine-threonine kinase inhibitors in recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer: a systematic review of literature

INTRODUCTION

While serine-threonine kinases (STK) are attractive therapeutic targets in epithelial ovarian cancer, clinical outcomes of STK inhibitors in the management of recurrent disease have not been completely described.

AREAS COVERED

A systematic literature review of published clinical studies on STK inhibitors targeting mTOR, MAPK, and aurora kinase pathways in recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer was conducted, revealing 18 clinical trials (497 patients). Pooled analyses were performed to assess treatment response, survival time, and adverse events. Median progression-free survival was 3.4 months in STK inhibitor-based therapy, and the average response rate and clinical benefit rate were 13% and 67%, respectively. Among regimens comprised of only STK inhibitors (11 trials, 299 patients), median progression-free time was 2.7 months, response rate was 10%, and clinical benefit rate was 64%. Compared to single STK inhibitor monotherapy (52.5%), clinical benefit rates significantly improved when STK inhibitors were combined with a cytotoxic agent (71.4%), other class biological agent (74.2%), or an additional STK inhibitor (95.0%) (all, P ≤ 0.002).

EXPERT OPINION

STK inhibitor-based therapy showed modest activity for recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer with reasonable clinical benefit rates, suggesting its potential utility for maintaining disease stability if supported by future studies. Efficacy appears greatly improved in appropriately selected patient populations, especially those with low-grade serous ovarian carcinoma, platinum-sensitive disease, cancers with somatic RAS or BRAF mutations, and when used in a combination regimen with a cytotoxic or biological agent.

Profile of bevacizumab in the treatment of platinum-resistant ovarian cancer: current perspectives

Patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer have progression of disease within 6 months of completing platinum-based chemotherapy. While several chemotherapeutic options exist for the treatment of platinum-resistant ovarian cancer, the overall response to any of these therapies is ~10%, with a median progression-free survival of 3–4 months and a median overall survival of 9–12 months. Bevacizumab (Avastin), a humanized, monoclonal antivascular endothelial growth factor antibody, has demonstrated antitumor activity in the platinum-resistant setting and was recently approved by US Food and Drug Administration for combination therapy with weekly paclitaxel, pegylated liposomal doxorubicin, or topotecan. This review summarizes key clinical trials investigating bevacizumab for recurrent, platinum-resistant ovarian cancer and provides an overview of efficacy, safety, and quality of life data relevant in this setting. While bevacizumab is currently the most studied and clinically available antiangiogenic therapy, we summarize recent studies highlighting novel alternatives, including vascular endothelial growth factor-trap, tyrosine kinase inhibitors, and angiopoietin inhibitor trebananib, and discuss their application for the treatment of platinum-resistant ovarian cancer.

Anti-vascular therapies in ovarian cancer: moving beyond anti-VEGF approaches

Resistance to chemotherapy is among the most important issues in the management of ovarian cancer. Unlike cancer cells, which are heterogeneous as a result of remarkable genetic instability, stromal cells are considered relatively homogeneous. Thus, targeting the tumor microenvironment is an attractive approach for cancer therapy. Arguably, anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) therapies hold great promise, but their efficacy has been modest, likely owing to redundant and complementary angiogenic pathways. Components of platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF), fibroblast growth factor (FGF), epidermal growth factor (EGF), and other pathways may compensate for VEGF blockade and allow angiogenesis to occur despite anti-VEGF treatment. In addition, hypoxia induced by anti-angiogenesis therapy modifies signaling pathways in tumor and stromal cells, which induces resistance to therapy. Because of tumor cell heterogeneity and angiogenic pathway redundancy, combining cytotoxic and targeted therapies or combining therapies targeting different pathways can potentially overcome resistance. Although targeted therapy is showing promise, much more work is needed to maximize its impact, including the discovery of new targets and identification of individuals most likely to benefit from such therapies.

An overview of tyrosine kinase inhibitors for the treatment of epithelial ovarian cancer

INTRODUCTION

Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is the most lethal gynecologic malignancy and the fifth most common cause of cancer-related deaths in women. Initial treatment with surgery and chemotherapy has improved survival significantly. However, the disease progresses or recurs in most patients. Thus, there is an urgent need to develop more effective treatment strategies.

AREAS COVERED

This article provides an overview of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) for the treatment of EOC, which is based on English peer-reviewed articles on MEDLINE and related abstracts presented at major conferences. The authors highlight the data from the published clinical trials in EOC patients who were treated with TKIs or TKI-based regimens.

EXPERT OPINION

EOC is responsive to most chemotherapeutic drugs and/or biological agents and represents an ideal disease model for investigating novel anti-cancer agents. Numerous small-molecule TKIs targeting the VEGFR, PARP, PI3K-AKT-mTOR, MAPK, Src, PKC, Wee1 and HER1/2 signaling pathways are currently being tested in clinical trials. Research is needed for devising regimens combining TKIs with other agents in an optimal timing schedule and for identifying potential biomarkers predictive of response and survival.

Tyrosine-kinases inhibitors in recurrent platinum-resistant ovarian cancer patients

For many decades, ovarian cancer (OC) has been one of the most common gynecological cancer. Despite advances in OC diagnosis and treatment, the risk of recurrence is ever present and approximately 85% of patients will experience relapse. Recurrent OC after first-line therapy is almost always incurable. Multiple novel therapies, including tyrosine-kinases inhibitors (TKI), have shown promising results, but their role needs to be clarified. In this review we describe the rationale and the clinical evidence regarding the use of TKI for the treatment of recurrent platinum-resistant OC patients.

Antiangiogenic agents in gynecological cancer: State of art and perspectives of clinical research

Vascular endothelial growth factor [VEGF] pathway, which plays a key role in angiogenesis, may be blocked by either extracellular interference with VEGF itself (bevacizumab [BEV] or aflibercept), or intracytoplasmic inhibition of VEGF receptor (pazopanib, nintedanib, cediranid, sunitinib and sorafenib). An alternative approach is represented by trebananib, a fusion protein that prevents the interaction of angiopoietin [Ang]-1 and Ang-2 with Tie2 receptor on vascular endothelium. The combination of antiangiogenic agents, especially BEV, and chemotherapy is a rational therapeutic option for primary or recurrent ovarian carcinoma. However, it will be difficult to accept that it represents the new standard treatment, until biological characterization of ovarian carcinoma has not identified subsets of tumors with different responsiveness to BEV. Anti-angiogenesis is an interesting target also for recurrent cervical or endometrial cancer, but nowadays the use of anti-angiogenic agents in these malignancies should be reserved to patients enrolled in clinical trials.

Randomized phase II trial of sorafenib alone or in combination with carboplatin/paclitaxel in women with recurrent platinum sensitive epithelial ovarian, peritoneal, or fallopian tube cancer

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

This study was designed to evaluate the response and toxicity of sorafenib alone or when combined with carboplatin and paclitaxel in patients with platinum-sensitive, recurrent ovarian cancer, fallopian tube cancer, or primary peritoneal cancer (EOC).

METHODS

Patients with recurrent platinum-sensitive EOC with no more than 2 prior courses of chemotherapy were randomized to single-agent sorafenib 400 mg twice daily or combination sorafenib 400 mg bid (days 2-19) with IV carboplatin (AUC 6) and IV paclitaxel 175 mg/m(2) (S+C/T) every 3 weeks. Single agent sorafenib could cross over to combination upon progression.

RESULTS

Patients were initially randomized to either arm, however, due to poor accrual, sorafenib arm was prematurely closed. A total of 13 patients were evaluable for response to sorafenib and 23 patients were evaluable for response to S+C/T. Objective response rate (RR) was 15 % for patients on sorafenib vs. 61 % for patients on S+C/T (p = 0.014); stable disease was seen in 62 % and 35 %, respectively. Clinical benefit rate (CBR) at 4 months (mos.) was 69 % for S and 65 % for S+C/T. The median progression free survival was 5.6 months on sorafenib vs. 16.8 months on S+C/T (p = 0.012) and there was no significant difference of overall survival between two arms (p = 0.974) with median overall survival 25.6 months under sorafenib vs. 25.9 months on S+C/T. Patients remained on trial for a median of 7.8 cycles on sorafenib and 5.4 cycles on S+C/T.

CONCLUSION

Sorafenib, alone or in combination with carboplatin and paclitaxel, has activity in patients with platinum-sensitive EOC. Sorafenib in combination with carboplatin and paclitaxel improved RR and PFS; however, there were increased grade and frequencies of toxicities.

Sorafenib: targeting multiple tyrosine kinases in cancer

Sorafenib (BAY 43-9006, Nexavar®) is an oral multiple tyrosine kinase inhibitor. Main targets are receptor tyrosine kinase pathways frequently deregulated in cancer such as the Raf-Ras pathway, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) pathway, and FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3). Sorafenib was approved by the FDA in fast track for advanced renal cell cancer and hepatocellular cancer and shows good clinical activity in thyroid cancer. Multiple clinical trials are undertaken to further investigate the role of sorafenib alone or in combination for the treatment of various tumor entities.

Two cases of recurrent ovarian clear cell carcinoma treated with sorafenib

Sorafenib is an oral multikinase inhibitor targeting Raf and other kinases. The anti-tumor effect of sorafenib is thought to be mediated through its inhibition of the RAS-Raf-Erk pathway, as well as its inhibition of VEGFR and PDGFR. Sorafenib has been effective at treating patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Ovarian clear cell carcinoma (OCCC) is a chemoresistant subtype of ovarian cancer. OCCC is represented by cells with clear cytoplasm that resemble those observed in RCC. Using a microarray database, the gene expression profile of OCCC was similar to that of RCC. The effects of sorafenib against human OCCC are unknown. Therefore, we used sorafenib to treat two patients with recurrent chemoresistant OCCC, and observed good effect in both of them without severe side effects. We believe that sorafenib is an effective agent against OCCC. Given the chemoresistant nature of this tumor, this drug appears to be very valuable.

Beyond bevacizumab: investigating new angiogenesis inhibitors in ovarian cancer

INTRODUCTION

Ovarian cancer is the most lethal gynecological cancer, mainly because of the advanced stage of the disease at diagnosis, with recent research investigating novel targets and agents into the clinical practice, with the aim to improve prognosis and quality of life. Angiogenesis is a significant target for ovarian cancer therapy.

AREAS COVERED

Areas covered in this review include the most common molecular pathways of angiogenesis, which have provided novel targets for tailored therapy in ovarian cancer patients. These therapeutic strategies comprise monoclonal antibodies and tyrosine kinase inhibitors. These drugs have as molecular targets such as vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), VEGF receptor, platelet-derived growth factor, fibroblast growth factor, angiopoietin and Ephrin type-A receptor 2.

EXPERT OPINION

The expansion in understanding the molecular biology that characterizes cancer cells has led to the rapid development of new agents to target important pathways, but the heterogeneity of ovarian cancer biology indicates that there is no predominant defect. This review attempts to discuss progress till date in tackling a more general target applicable to ovarian cancer angiogenesis.

The potential of sunitinib as a therapy in ovarian cancer

INTRODUCTION

Sunitinib malate (SU11248; Sutent®; Pfizer, Inc., New York) is a multi-kinase inhibitor currently approved for use in advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC), imatinib-resistant/-intolerant gastrointestinal stromal tumours and progressive, well-differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours in patients with unresectable, locally advanced or metastatic disease.

AREAS COVERED

This article describes the mechanism of action and of the pharmacokinetics of sunitinib; further, it summarizes Phase I and II trials on the clinical efficacy, tolerability and safety of this agent in the setting of ovarian cancer (OC) treatment.

EXPERT OPINION

On the basis of the current literature, sunitinib has shown modest antitumour activity and acceptable toxicity. Studies investigating the impact of horizontal and vertical combinations should represent a priority of future research. Although clinical Phase II trials on the use of sunitinib in the treatment of OC demonstrated an acceptable profile of AEs, a greater comprehension of the toxicity of this compound is recommended.

Network analysis identifies an HSP90-central hub susceptible in ovarian cancer

PURPOSE

Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is usually detected at an advanced stage and is frequently lethal. Although many patients respond to initial surgery and standard chemotherapy consisting of a platinum-based agent and a taxane, most experience recurrence and eventually treatment-resistant disease. Although there have been numerous efforts to apply protein-targeted agents in EOC, these studies have so far documented little efficacy. Our goal was to identify broadly susceptible signaling proteins or pathways in EOC.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

As a new approach, we conducted data-mining meta-analyses integrating results from multiple siRNA screens to identify gene targets that showed significant inhibition of cell growth. On the basis of this meta-analysis, we established that many genes with such activity were clients of the protein chaperone HSP90. We therefore assessed ganetespib, a clinically promising second-generation small-molecule HSP90 inhibitor, for activity against EOC, both as a single agent and in combination with cytotoxic and targeted therapeutic agents.

RESULTS

Ganetespib significantly reduced cell growth, induced cell-cycle arrest and apoptosis in vitro, inhibited growth of orthotopic xenografts and spontaneous ovarian tumors in transgenic mice in vivo, and inhibited expression and activation of numerous proteins linked to EOC progression. Importantly, paclitaxel significantly potentiated ganetespib activity in cultured cells and tumors. Moreover, combined treatment of cells with ganetespib and siRNAs or small molecules inhibiting genes identified in the meta-analysis in several cases resulted in enhanced activity.

CONCLUSION

These results strongly support investigation of ganetespib, a single-targeted agent with effects on numerous proteins and pathways, in augmenting standard EOC therapies.

Targeting tyrosine-kinases in ovarian cancer

INTRODUCTION

Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is the leading cause of gynaecologic cancer death. Although in some cases initial treatment is effective, most of the women diagnosed with EOC will probably need medical treatment for their disease. There is a critical need to develop effective new strategies for the management of patients with advanced or recurrent EOC, and targeted therapy with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) has continued to be an area of active research and development in this setting.

AREAS COVERED

This review summarises the available evidence on the use of TKIs in the clinical management of women with EOC. This article consists of material obtained via Medline, PubMed and EMBASE literature searches up to March 2013.

EXPERT OPINION

Several Phase I/II and III trials evaluated TKIs in EOC; however, it is difficult to draw conclusions on the efficacy of TKI regimens in these patients. TKIs seem to be better tolerated than conventional chemotherapy with a different toxicity profile. A better understanding of the signalling pathways, the toxicity profiles, the potential pharmacokinetic interactions as well as the identification of predictive biomarkers are needed to better identify a targeted patient population before these agents become part of routine treatment.

Translational predictive biomarker analysis of the phase 1b sorafenib and bevacizumab study expansion cohort

Predictive biomarkers are needed to triage patients to the best therapy. We prospectively planned examination of sequential blood, biopsy, and functional imaging with which to confirm the mechanism and to identify potential predictive biomarkers in a phase Ib clinical trial expansion of patients with solid tumors receiving sorafenib/bevacizumab. The maximally tolerated doses of sorafenib at 200 mg twice daily with bevacizumab at 5 mg/kg every other week were given to biopsiable patients. Patients were randomized to receive either sorafenib or bevacizumab monotherapy for the first 28-day cycle with the second drug added with cycle 2. Biopsies, dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI, and fluorodeoxyglucose-proton emission tomography were done pre-therapy and at 2 and 6 weeks (2 weeks into combination therapy). Tumor and serum proteomics, Ras/Raf mutational analysis, and functional imaging results were examined individually and across the dataset to identify potential changes predictive of response to therapy and those that confirm the biochemical drug mechanism(s). Therapy with sorafenib/bevacizumab resulted in clinical benefit in 45% of this mixed solid tumor group. ERK activation and microvessel density were decreased with monotherapy treatment with sorafenib or bevacizumab, respectively; whereas a decreased signal over the group of total AKT, phospho(p)-VEGF receptor2, p-endothelial nitric-oxide synthase, b-RAF, and cleaved poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase was associated with earlier progression of disease. Tumor metabolic activity decreased in those patients with clinical benefits lasting longer than 4 months, and activity increased with progression of disease. Cleavage of caspase 3 and poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase was increased, and Ki67 expression decreased in patients with prolonged clinical benefits, consistent with decreased proliferation and increased apoptosis. The conglomerate analysis, incorporating pharmacodynamic and tumor biochemistry, demonstrated sorafenib/bevacizumab-targeted vascular activity in the tumor. Results suggest potential biomarkers for which changes, as a group, during early therapeutic exposure may predict clinical benefit.

Clinical trials and future potential of targeted therapy for ovarian cancer

Ovarian cancer is the leading cause of death in women with gynecological cancer. Most patients are diagnosed at an advanced stage with a poor prognosis. Currently, surgical tumor debulking followed by chemotherapy based on platinum and taxane is the standard treatment for advanced disease. However, these patients remain at great risk for recurrence and developing drug resistance. Therefore, new treatment strategies are needed to improve outcomes for patients with advanced and recurrent ovarian cancer. Several agents targeted at particular molecules have been developed for ovarian cancer and are now entering clinical trials. The functional targets of these agents are aberrations in tumor tissues including angiogenesis, the human epidermal growth factor receptor family, poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP), mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) signaling pathway, and α-folate receptor (α-FR). The anti-angiogenic compound bevacizumab has been reported as the most effective targeted agent. Bevacizumab plus chemotherapy prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) both for advanced and platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer, but did not increase overall survival. A PARP inhibitor, olaparib, applied as maintenance treatment also improved PFS in platinum-sensitive relapsed ovarian cancer. Furthermore, mTOR inhibitors and a monoclonal antibody to α-FR, farletuzumab, are attractive treatment strategies either alone or combined with chemotherapy. Understanding the tumor molecular biology and identifying predictive biomarkers are essential steps in selecting the best treatment strategies. This article reviews available clinical data on the most promising targeted agents for ovarian cancer.

A phase II trial of Sunitinib malate in recurrent and refractory ovarian, fallopian tube and peritoneal carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

Ovarian cancer is a highly angiogenic tumor and a model for antiangiogenic research. The tyrosine kinase receptor inhibitors target several receptors allowing for the pharmacological disruption of several independent pathways. Sunitinib malate is a multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor. A phase II study utilizing a modified dosing schedule was conducted to assess the efficacy and safety of Sunitinib in recurrent ovarian, fallopian tube and peritoneal carcinoma.

METHODS

A nonrandomized phase II study was modeled as a two-stage Simon design initially enrolling 17 evaluable participants in stage one and 18 patients in stage two. Patients received the study drug at 37.5mg every day over a 28 day treatment cycle until clinical or radiological evidence of progressive disease. Disease was evaluated radiographically and best overall response was defined using the RECIST 1.0 criteria. The primary objective of this study was to define the response rate (defined as complete response and partial response) while the secondary objectives included both the progression free rate as well as the safety of this agent in this patient population.

RESULTS

The response rate (PR+CR) was 8.3% (95% confidence interval: 1.8%, 22.5%). The 16-week and 24 week progression-free survival estimate was 36% (95% confidence interval and 19.2%), respectively. The median progression-free survival estimate was 9.9 weeks. Hypertension and gastrointestional events were the most common toxicities noted.

CONCLUSIONS

A modest response rate of 8.3% was achieved with Sunitinib malate. This phase II study adds to the body of literature of VEGFR inhibitors and further underscores the need of defining a genetic angiogenic signature.

Targeted molecular therapies for ovarian cancer: an update and future perspectives (Review)

Identification of the potential gene expression profiles of epithelial ovarian cancer and the arrival of newly targeted therapies have advanced the strategies used for treatment of this disease. This review focuses on the design of ongoing and planned clinical trials and offers a synopsis of the English-language literature for preclinical and clinical targeted therapies for epithelial ovarian cancer. Among many targeted agents, a promising, novel class of targeted drugs for special patient populations expected to improve the effectiveness of current therapy include inhibitors of angiogenesis, poly (ADP ribose) polymerase (PARP) and DNA repair mechanisms. Inhibition of PARP or homologous recombination (HR) repair mediated by Chk1 (checkpoint kinase 1) would selectively sensitize p53 mutation, BRCAness phenotype (serous type ovarian cancer) or HNF (hepatocyte nuclear factor)-1β-overexpressing tumor cells (clear cell type ovarian cancer) to chemotherapeutic agents. The therapeutic response is likely to be limited to a targeted patient, but not to the broad population. This review discusses some of the key current developments and existing challenges.

Turning promise into progress for antiangiogenic agents in epithelial ovarian cancer

Despite efforts to improve chemotherapeutic efficacy in epithelial ovarian cancer, outcome for patients with advanced disease has remained unchanged since the introduction of standard carboplatin and paclitaxel. Interest has therefore shifted toward molecularly targeted therapies that interfere with important features of ovarian carcinogenesis, such as angiogenesis. Several angiogenesis inhibitors, targeting vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) ligands (bevacizumab, VEGF-Trap) or their receptors (VEGFR-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitors) have been clinically evaluated. These agents demonstrated efficacy in phase II clinical trials. Results from phase III trials, in which bevacizumab was added to standard frontline chemotherapy, show a modest effect. Although the initial expectations for angiogenesis inhibitors have been tempered, further research is warranted to define their precise place in the treatment of ovarian cancer. This review summarizes the performed and ongoing studies with regard to angiogenesis inhibitors in ovarian cancer, and the available data on biomarkers for response prediction. Preclinical studies evaluating alternative angiogenesis inhibitors will also be discussed.

Optimizing molecular-targeted therapies in ovarian cancer: the renewed surge of interest in ovarian cancer biomarkers and cell signaling pathways

The hallmarks of ovarian cancer encompass the development of resistance, disease recurrence and poor prognosis. Ovarian cancer cells express gene signatures which pose significant challenges for cancer drug development, therapeutics, prevention and management. Despite enhancements in contemporary tumor debulking surgery, tentative combination regimens and abdominal radiation which can achieve beneficial response rates, the majority of ovarian cancer patients not only experience adverse effects, but also eventually relapse. Therefore, additional therapeutic possibilities need to be explored to minimize adverse events and prolong progression-free and overall response rates in ovarian cancer patients. Currently, a revival in cancer drug discovery is devoted to identifying diagnostic and prognostic ovarian cancer biomarkers. However, the sensitivity and reliability of such biomarkers may be complicated by mutations in the BRCA1 or BRCA2 genes, diverse genetic risk factors, unidentified initiation and progression elements, molecular tumor heterogeneity and disease staging. There is thus a dire need to expand existing ovarian cancer therapies with broad-spectrum and individualized molecular targeted approaches. The aim of this review is to profile recent developments in our understanding of the interrelationships among selected ovarian tumor biomarkers, heterogeneous expression signatures and related molecular signal transduction pathways, and their translation into more efficacious targeted treatment rationales.