Clinicopathologic features of brain metastases from gynecologic malignancies: a retrospective study of 139 cases (KCOG-G1001s trial)

PARP Inhibitors in Brain Metastases from Epithelial Ovarian Cancer through a Multimodal Patient Journey: Case Reports and Literature Review

Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is the deadliest gynecological malignancy worldwide. Brain metastasis (BM) is quite an uncommon presentation. However, the likelihood of central nervous system (CNS) metastasization should be considered in the context of disseminated disease. The therapeutic management of BMs is an unmet clinical need, to date. We identified, across different cancer centers, six cases of both BRCA wild-type and BRCA-mutated EOCs spreading to the CNS. They presented either with a single brain lesion or with multiple lesions and most of them had intracranial-only disease. All cases received Poly-ADP ribose polymerase inhibitor (PARPi) maintenance, as per clinical practice, for a long time within a multimodal treatment approach. We also provide an insight into the available body of work regarding the management of this intriguing disease setting, with a glimpse of future therapeutic challenges. Despite the lack of unanimous guidelines, multimodal care pathways should be encouraged for the optimal disease control of this unfortunate patient subset. Albeit not being directly investigated in BM patients, PARPi maintenance is deemed to have a valuable role in this setting. Prospective research, aimed to implement worthwhile strategies in the multimodal patient journey of BMs from EOC, is eagerly awaited.

Survival prediction in patients with gynecological cancer irradiated for brain metastases

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

This large population-based, retrospective, single-center study aimed to identify prognostic factors in patients with brain metastases (BM) from gynecological cancers.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

One hundred and forty four patients with BM from gynecological cancer treated with radiotherapy (RT) were identified. Primary cancer diagnosis, age, performance status, number of BM, presence of extracranial disease, and type of BM treatment were assessed. Overall survival (OS) was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method and the Cox proportional hazards regression model was used for multivariable analysis. A prognostic index (PI) was developed based on scores from independent predictors of OS.

RESULTS

Median OS for the entire study population was 6.2 months. Forty per cent of patients died within 3 months after start of RT. Primary cancer with the origin in cervix or vulva (p = 0.001),  Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) 3-4 (p < 0.001), and the presence of extracranial disease (p = 0.001) were associated with significantly shorter OS. The developed PI based on these factors, categorized patients into three risk groups with a median OS of 13.5, 4.0, and 2.4 months for the good, intermediate, and poor prognosis group, respectively.

INTERPRETATION

Patients with BM from gynecological cancers carry a poor prognosis. We identified prognostic factors and developed a scoring tool to select patients with better or worse prognosis. Patients in the high-risk group have a particular poor prognosis, and omission of RT could be considered.

Gamma Knife radiosurgery for gynecologic metastases to the brain: Analysis of pathology, survival, and tumor control

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) in improving health outcomes of patients with gynecologic brain metastases.

METHODS

Patients with gynecologic metastases treated with SRS from 2008 to 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. The median age at SRS was 63 years old (cervical 45.5, endometrial 65.5, ovarian 61). The median number of tumors was 3 (range 1-27), and cumulative tumor volume was 2.33 cc (range 0.03-45.63). Median margin dose prescribed was 16 Gy (range 14 Gy - 20 Gy). The median 12 Gy volume was 7.30 cc (range 0.21-74.14 cc). Outcome variables included overall survival (OS) after SRS, local tumor control (LTC), distant tumor control, and adverse radiation effect (ARE).

RESULTS

Fifty patients (4 cervical, 25 endometrial, and 21 ovarian cancer) were identified. The OS at 6 and 12 months after SRS was 48%, and 44%, respectively. Eight patients (16%) died from CNS disease progression. The number of brain metastases (p = 0.011) and the Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) ≥ 70 (p = 0.020) were significant predictors of OS. LTC rate at 6 and 12 months were 92%, and 87%, respectively. Margin dose ≥16Gy correlated with significantly better local tumor control (p = 0.0001) without increased risk of ARE (p = 0.055). The risk of developing new metastases at 6 and 12 months were 12% and 24% respectively. SRS-induced ARE events occurred in 7 patients.

CONCLUSION

Intracranial metastases from gynecologic malignancy can be effectively treated using SRS with low risk of neurotoxicity. Margin dose ≥16Gy can provide significantly better tumor control. Repeat SRS can be utilized to treat new metastases while avoiding the potential cognitive symptoms associated with WBRT.

Central nervous system metastasis in gynecologic cancers: Seeking the prognostic factors

OBJECTIVE

Central nervous system (CNS) metastasis originating from gynecological cancer is a very rare and late manifestation of the disease. Therefore, there is still limited data on prognostic factors for survival. The objective of the present study is to identify prognostic factors for survival in patients with CNS metastasis originating from gynecological cancer.

STUDY DESIGN

The present retrospective study analyzed the patients with gynecological cancers who were treated due to CNS metastases between January 1999 and December 2019 at Istanbul University Hospital.

RESULTS

Forty-seven patients with CNS metastasis of gynecological origin were included in the study. The median age at the time of CNS metastasis was 59 (range 34-93). The median time from initial cancer diagnosis to CNS metastasis was 24.9 (range: 0-108.2) months. Most patients had epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) (76.6%), followed by endometrial cancer (EC) (14.8%), cervical cancer (CC) (4.3%), and vulvar cancer (VC) (4.3%). By multivariate analysis, the presence of extracranial metastasis (HR: 5.10; 95% CI: 1.71-15.18), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status ≥3 (HR: 2.92; 95% CI: 1.36-6.26), palliative care only for the treatment of CNS metastasis (HR: 1.47; 95% CI: 0.58-4.11), and treatment-free interval (TFI) <6 months (HR: 2.74; 95% CI: 1.23-6.08) were independent factors that associated with worse survival.

CONCLUSION

Patients with CNS metastasis who have favorable prognostic factors are considered to be appropriate candidates for aggressive and long-term treatment strategies. Extracranial metastasis, ECOG performance status, treatment history of CNS metastasis, and TFI were determined as independent prognostic factors that improved survival. TFI might be taken into account as a prognostic factor for patients with CNS metastasis in gynecological cancer.

Prognostic features of endometrial cancer metastasis to the central nervous system

Objectives

Central nervous system metastases (CNSm) secondary to endometrial cancer (EC) are rare. As a result, prognostic factors for this patient population are not well described.

Methods

EC patients with CNSm were identified retrospectively from two academic centers. EC patients without CNSm (non-CNSm) were used as controls. Chi-square and Fisher’s exact tests were used for analysis of categorial variables. Wilcoxon tests were used for quantitative measures. Overall survival (OS) was compared with Log-rank test. Cox proportional hazard models were used to estimate hazard ratios for OS.

Results

22 EC patients with CNSm and 354 non-CNSm patients were included. Compared to non-CNSm EC, the CNSm cohort was younger (58.5 vs 62.0 years, p = 0.018) with lower BMI (27.7 vs. 33.7 kg/m², p = 0.005), and had more advanced stages (p = ≤ 0.001), grade 3 tumors (81.8% CNSm vs 25.1% non CNSm, p≤0.001) and serous histology (22.7% vs 8.5%, p = 0.010). Median survival after CNSm diagnosis was 9 months (95% CI 4, NA). CNSm was a strong poor prognostic factor (HR death 4.96, p = 0.022). Improved OS was seen with CNS as the only disease site (83m CNSm only vs 30m additional sites, p = 0.007) and less than five CNSm (49m <5 vs. 23m ≥5, p = 0.004). Surgical resection of CNSm (OS 83m surgery vs 33m no surgery, p = 0.003) or multimodal therapy (83m multimodal vs 33m single therapy, p = 0.027) resulted in longer OS.

Conclusions

CNSm is a poor prognostic factor in EC, however, low volume disease with aggressive treatment may result in more favorable survival outcomes.

Brain metastases in patients with ovarian cancer

BACKGROUND

Brain metastasis (BM) are uncommon among women with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). The frequency, risk factors and clinical repercussions of BM in these patients are not well described.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated EOC patients treated at our center from 2002 to 2020 and assessed their clinical parameters, risk for BM development and association with overall survival (OS). This cohort has a known high frequency of BRCA mutation carriers (BRCAm) due to women of Ashkenazi Jewish descent.

RESULTS

Among 1035 EOC patients, 29 (2.8%) were diagnosed with BM. The prevalence of BRCA mutations was more common among women with BM (56.5% vs. 34.3%, p = 0.033). The BM rate in patients with BRCAm was higher than the BM rate in those with wildtype BRCA (BRCAw; 5.1% vs. 2.1%, OR = 2.6; 95% CI: 1.2-5.4, p = 0.013). Median time from diagnosis to BM and from disease recurrence to BM was longer among patients with BRCAm. Median OS was not significantly different among patients with BM versus those without BM (59.4 vs. 73.4 months, p = 0.243). After BM diagnosis, median OS was not statistically significantly different between patients with BRCAm and those with BRCAw (20.6 vs. 12.3 months, p = 0.441). Treatment with poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors and bevacizumab had no impact on subsequent development of BM.

CONCLUSIONS

BM are rare among EOC patients. However, the risk is three-fold higher among patients with BRCAm. BM do not significantly alter OS among EOC patients. The higher rate of BM in patients with BRCAm may be related to longer OS in this subpopulation.

Biomarkers of Central Nervous System Involvement from Epithelial Ovarian Cancer

Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is the leading cause of death among women affected by gynaecological malignancies. Most patients show advanced disease at diagnosis (FIGO stage III-IV) and, despite the introduction of new therapeutic options, most women experience relapses. In most cases, recurrence is abdominal-pelvic; however, EOC can occasionally metastasize to distant organs, including the central nervous system. The incidence of brain metastases (BMs) from EOC is low, but it has grown over time; currently, there are no follow-up strategies available. In the last decade, a few biomarkers able to predict the risk of developing BMs from OC or as potential therapeutic targets have been investigated by several authors; to date, none have entered clinical practice. The purpose of this review is to offer a summary on the role of the most relevant predictors of central nervous system (CNS) involvement (hormone receptors; BRCA; MRD1; PD-1/PD-L1) and to highlight possible therapeutic strategies for the management of metastatic brain disease in EOC.

Gamma Knife Radiosurgery-Based Combination Treatment Strategies Improve Survival in Patients With Central Nervous System Metastases From Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: A Retrospective Analysis of Two Academic Institutions in Korea and Taiwan

Central nervous system (CNS) metastases from epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) are rare. We investigated the clinico-pathological prognostic factors of patients with CNS metastases from EOC and compared the outcomes of various treatment modalities. We retrospectively reviewed the records of patients with CNS metastases from EOC between 2000 and 2020. Information on the clinical and pathological characteristics, treatment, and outcomes of these patients was retrieved from Samsung Medical Center and National Taiwan University Hospital. A total of 94 patients with CNS metastases were identified among 6,300 cases of EOC, resulting in an incidence of 1.49%. Serous histological type [hazard ratio (HR): 0.49 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.25-0.95), p=0.03], progressive disease [HR: 2.29 (95% CI 1.16-4.54), p=0.01], CNS involvement in first disease relapse [HR: 0.36 (95% CI 0.18-0.70), p=0.002], and gamma knife radiosurgery (GKS)-based combination treatment for EOC patients with CNS lesions [HR: 0.59 (95% CI 0.44-0.79), p<0.001] significantly impacted survival after diagnosis of CNS metastases. In a subgroup analysis, superior survival was observed in patients with CNS involvement not in first tumor recurrence who underwent GKS-based combination therapeutic regimens. The survival benefit of GKS-based treatment was not significant in patients with CNS involvement in first disease relapse, but a trend for longer survival was still observed. In conclusion, GKS-based combination treatment can be considered for the treatment of EOC patients with CNS metastases. The patients with CNS involvement not in first disease relapse could significantly benefit from GKS-based combination strategies.

Brain Metastases from Uterine Cervical and Endometrial Cancer

Simple Summary

This review investigated the prevalence, clinical characteristics, clinical presentation, diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis of patients with brain metastases from uterine cervical carcinoma (CC) and uterine endometrial carcinoma (EC). The findings of this review indicate the factors that can facilitate better treatment selection and, consequently, better outcomes in patients with CC and EC.

Abstract

Reports on brain metastases (BMs) from uterine cervical carcinoma (CC) and uterine endometrial carcinoma (EC) have recently increased due to the development of massive databases and improvements in diagnostic procedures. This review separately investigates the prevalence, clinical characteristics, clinical presentation, diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis of BMs from CC and uterine endometrial carcinoma EC. For patients with CC, early-stage disease and poorly differentiated carcinoma lead to BMs, and elderly age, poor performance status, and multiple BMs are listed as poor prognostic factors. Advanced-stage disease and high-grade carcinoma are high-risk factors for BMs from EC, and multiple metastases and extracranial metastases, or unimodal therapies, are possibly factors indicating poor prognosis. There is no “most effective” therapy that has gained consensus for the treatment of BMs. Treatment decisions are based on clinical status, number of the metastases, tumor size, and metastases at distant organs. Surgical resection followed by adjuvant radiotherapy appears to be the best treatment approach to date. Stereotactic ablative radiation therapy has been increasingly associated with good outcomes in preserving cognitive functions. Despite treatment, patients died within 1 year after the BM diagnosis. BMs from uterine cancer remain quite rare, and the current evidence is limited; thus, further studies are needed.

Brain Metastases from Ovarian Cancer: Current Evidence in Diagnosis, Treatment, and Prognosis

With this review, we provide the state of the art concerning brain metastases (BMs) from ovarian cancer (OC), a rare condition. Clinical, pathological, and molecular features, treatment options, and future perspectives are comprehensively discussed. Overall, a diagnosis of high-grade serous OC and an advanced disease stage are common features among patients who develop brain metastases. BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene mutations, as well as the expression of androgen receptors in the primary tumor, are emerging risk and prognostic factors which could allow one to identify categories of patients at greater risk of BMs, who could benefit from a tailored follow-up. Based on present data, a multidisciplinary approach combining surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy seem to be the best approach for patients with good performance status, although the median overall survival (<1 year) remains largely disappointing. Hopefully, novel therapeutic avenues are being explored, like PARP inhibitors and immunotherapy, based on our improved knowledge regarding tumor biology, but further investigation is warranted.

Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy for Recurrent or Metastatic Gynecological Cancer: Extending Lives?

OPINION STATEMENT

Recent phase II clinical trials suggest that stereotactic ablative radiation therapy (SABR) can potentially improve survival for patients with oligometastatic cancer. However, these studies have mostly enrolled primaries other than gynecologic malignancies. While level I evidence is limited, recent publications exploring the use of SABR for oligometastatic gynecologic cancers have indicated a potential role for this treatment in para-aortic lymph node recurrences, and in visceral and brain metastases. The use of SABR for recurrences in the pelvis presents a number of challenges as these patients have often received previous radiation treatment. In these settings, care must be taken to avoid trespassing normal tissue tolerance with SABR leading to toxicity, especially as the potential benefit of SABR in this setting is not based on high-level evidence. Although SABR is feasible and in general safe for oligometastatic gynecologic malignancies, insufficient data are available to indicate whether it is associated with improved survival. Clinical judgment that incorporates patient and tumor factors is needed to determine if SABR is appropriate for selecting patients. Future directions include combining SABR with novel systemic therapies, determining optimal sequencing of treatments, and generating more robust randomized data pertaining to the use of SABR for oligometastatic gynecologic cancers.

Age, pathology and CA-125 are prognostic factors for survival in patients with brain metastases from gynaecological tumours

•

The largest cohort of brain metastases patients from gynaecological tumours.

•

CA-125, age and primary tumour type are prognostic for survival.

•

This will inform clinical practice and aid the development of new prognostic tools.

Background and purpose

Brain metastases originating from gynaecological tumours are a rare phenomenon, but have an increasing incidence due to better targeted therapies. This study aimed to identify factors that predict survival in these patients, which can be used in creating a robust prognostic tool for shared decision making.

Materials and methods

We identified a consecutive cohort of 73 patients treated for gynaecological brain metastases in two tertiary institutions. Baseline demographics, pathology and serum CA-125 were included in a multivariable Cox proportional hazards model.

Results

Median overall survival in our cohort was 14.4 months, with a one-year survival of 56.4% and a two-year survival of 39.1%. Thirty-eight patients (52.1%) had ovarian carcinoma as the primary malignancy. The following factors were significantly associated with survival: age (HR 1.05 per year), CA-125 (HR 1.02 par 50 U/ml), and uterine and vulvar primary tumours (when compared to ovarian carcinoma, with HRs 3.07 and 8.70). A post-hoc analysis with primary tumour site reclassified into ovary versus non-ovary showed a HR of 0.50 for ovarian primary tumour type.

Conclusion

We have found that age, pathology and CA-125 are prognostic factors for survival in patients with brain metastases from gynaecological tumours. Our findings may provide a foundation for future development of prediction models, for the benefit of both patients and physicians.

Validation of Androgen Receptor loss as a risk factor for the development of brain metastases from ovarian cancers

Background

Central nervous system (CNS) spreading from epithelial ovarian carcinoma (EOC) is an uncommon but increasing phenomenon. We previously reported in a small series of 11 patients a correlation between Androgen Receptor (AR) loss and localization to CNS. Aims of this study were: to confirm a predictive role of AR loss in an independent validation cohort; to evaluate if AR status impacts on EOC survival.

Results

We collected an additional 29 cases and 19 controls as validation cohort. In this independent cohort at univariate analysis, cases exhibited lower expression of AR, considered both as continuous (p <  0.001) and as discrete variable (10% cut-off: p <  0.003; Immunoreactive score: p <  0.001). AR negative EOC showed an odds ratio (OR) = 8.33 for CNS dissemination compared with AR positive EOC. Kaplan-Meier curves of the combined dataset, combining data of new validation cohort with the previously published cohort, showed that AR <  10% significantly correlates with worse outcomes (p = 0.005 for Progression Free Survival (PFS) and p = 0.002 for brain PFS (bPFS) respectively).

Comparison of AR expression between primary tissue and paired brain metastases in the combined dataset did not show any statistically significant difference.

Conclusions

We confirmed AR loss as predictive role for CNS involvement from EOC in an independent cohort of cases and controls. Early assessment of AR status could improve clinical management and patients’ prognosis.

Prognostic impact of platinum sensitivity in ovarian carcinoma patients with brain metastasis

Background

Brain metastasis (BM) is a rare event in ovarian cancer patients. The current prognostic scores that have been used for other tumors do not account for specific characteristics of ovarian cancer, such as platinum sensitivity.

Methods

This retrospective cohort study examined patients with ovarian carcinoma and BM who were treated at a single institution from January 2007 to December 2017. Clinical data on the diagnosis of BM and follow-up were collected. Cox regression was used to evaluate prognostic factors for overall survival (OS).

Results

Of 560 patients, 26 presented with BM. Eight patients were treated with surgery, 15 with whole-brain radiotherapy (RT), and 5 with stereotactic RT, and 4 patients received systemic treatment at the diagnosis of BM. The median OS was 10.8 months. The following factors were associated with OS: platinum-sensitive recurrence (HR 0.34, 95% CI 0.12–0.99; p = 0.049), higher number of previous treatment lines (HR 1.57, 95% CI 1.12–2.19; p = 0.008), ECOG performance status (HR 2.52, 95% CI 1.24–5.09; p = 0.010), and longer interval from initial diagnosis to BM (p = 0.025). Notably, the number of brain metastasis, the largest tumor size, and progression outside of the CNS were not related to survival. Platinum sensitivity was not associated with any of the classic prognostic factors in brain metastasis patients such as number or size of brain metastasis or disease progression outside the CNS strengthening the hypothesis of the importance of platinum sensitivity to the prognosis of ovarian cancer patients with BM.

Conclusions

The factors related to the biological behavior of the ovarian cancer such as platinum sensitivity at the time of BM diagnosis, fewer number of previous treatment lines and interval from initial diagnosis were associated with survival in ovarian cancer patients with BM, while factors that are usually related to survival in BM in other cancers were not associated with survival in this cohort of ovarian cancer patients. The small number of patients did not allow us to exclude the prognostic role of these former factors that were not associated with survival in the present cohort.

The prognostic factors influencing overall survival in uterine cervical cancer with brain metastasis

BACKGROUND/AIMS

The occurrence of brain metastasis (BM) has increased due to improved overall survival (OS) in uterine cervical cancer. However, research about prognostic factors and therapeutic guidelines for BM in uterine cervical cancer remains scarce due to the rarity of BM in this type of cancer. The present study evaluated the clinical characteristics and prognostic factors influencing OS in patients with BM from uterine cervical cancer.

METHODS

A total of 19 BM patients of uterine cervical cancer were analyzed retrospectively from January 1995 to December 2016.

RESULTS

The median and mean OS of all patients was 9.6 and 15.4 months. Treatment (vs. palliative care, p < 0.001), fewer than three regimens of chemotherapy before BM (vs. ≥ 3, p < 0.013), and chemotherapy after BM (vs. absence, p < 0.001) significantly increased the OS time. The Karnofsky performance status ≥ 70 (vs. < 70, p = 0.213), single BM (vs. multiple BM, p = 0.157), and small cell carcinoma (vs. others, p = 0.351) had numerically higher OS than others. Dual therapy (vs. single therapy, p = 0.182; vs. no therapy, p = 0.076) were associated with a longer OS time, but the difference did not reach statistical significance. In addition, the graded prognostic assessment (GPA) appeared to be a better prognostic tool than the recursive partitioning analysis.

CONCLUSION

The results of the present study suggest active multimodal treatment including neurosurgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy for BM of uterine cervical cancer with single BM, good performance status, histology of small cell carcinoma, and a better GPA.

Pathologically confirmed brain metastases from primary uterine cervical tumors: two cases and a literature review

Background

Pathologically confirmed brain metastasis from primary cervical cancer is extremely rare. Herein, we report two cases of intracranial metastasis from cervical cancer that were histopathologically confirmed after surgical excision. In addition, we conducted a literature review to characterize the clinical manifestation, pathogenesis, and treatment of these patients.

Case summary

Among the 1800 patients with primary cervical cancer who received therapy at our center from 2010 to 2018, two patients (0.1%) had definite histopathological evidence of brain metastasis. A 46-year-old female who had a history of poorly differentiated stage IIB cervical cancer with neuroendocrine differentiation presented with a solitary mass in the right occipital lobe 26 months after the initial diagnosis. She underwent surgery and chemotherapy but died of disease progression 9 months later. Another 55-year-old female diagnosed with poorly differentiated stage IVB cervical squamous cancer presented with a solitary mass in the right frontal lobe 16 months after simple hysterectomy. Twelve months later, multiple lesions were observed in the bilateral frontal-parietal lobe. The lesions were treated by surgery and stereotactic radiosurgery. The patient died of multiple organ failure 14 months later.

Conclusion

The pathogenesis and best management of brain metastasis from cervical cancer are not clear. Highly invasive subtypes or advanced cancer stages may be the key clinicopathological factors of brain metastasis. Surgical treatment is warranted in patients with a good health status and without metastasis to other sites.

Leptomeningeal metastases arising from gynecological cancers

BACKGROUND

Most cases of leptomeningeal metastasis (LM) arise from solid tumors, such as breast cancer, lung cancer, or malignant melanoma. LM arising from gynecological cancers are extremely rare. Longer survival owing to recent advances in chemotherapy and other treatments has contributed to the increased frequency of gynecological cancers metastasizing to the central nervous system (CNS). Detailed information regarding LM is scarce; therefore, we conducted a study concerning LM arising from primary gynecological cancers.

METHODS

Among 24 patients with CNS metastases from gynecological cancer treated at our hospital between January 2011 and August 2018, those who were eventually diagnosed with LM were included in this retrospective study.

RESULTS

Among 24 patients with CNS metastases, five patients (20.8%) were diagnosed with LM. The primary cancer was endometrial in two, cervical in one, and peritoneal in two patients. Of these five patients, three developed LM as a complication 1-11 months after the treatment of brain metastases; one patient had multiple brain metastases diagnosed at the same time as LM, and one had LM alone, without accompanying brain metastases. The median survival after the diagnosis of LM was 23 (12-69) days, while the median survival of 24 patients after the initial diagnosis of CNS metastases was 106 (13-959) days.

CONCLUSION

Although LM arising from gynecological cancers is considered rare, identification of LM may be important to predict prognosis and develop new therapeutic strategies.

Brain metastases from cervical cancer reduce longevity independent of overall tumor burden

Background:

Isolated brain metastasis (IBM) from cervical cancer is a very rare encounter in neurosurgery. We sought to understand how patients with isolated brain metastases differ from those with metastases in the setting of widespread disease.

Methods:

A systematic review was completed using PubMed and the Cochrane Library. Patients with isolated brain metastases (IBM) and non-isolated brain metastases (NIBM, or brain metastases in the setting of disseminated disease), were compared. Two-sided statistical tests were used to determine significance. Survival function was carried out using the Kaplan–Meier method.

Results:

A total of 89 patients, 25 with IBM and 64 with NIBM, were identified. The time interval between initial diagnosis of cervical cancer and diagnosis of brain lesion was significantly shorter in the IBM group (median 7.5 vs. 20.05 months, and IBM vs. NIBM, respectively; P = 0.006). Overall survival from initial diagnosis of cervical cancer was significantly shorter for the IBM group versus the NIBM group (7.63 vs. 26.3 months, respectively; P = 0.0005). Data demonstrate a 3.4-fold reduction of median life expectancy to 7.63 months. Survival after diagnosis of brain metastases did not differ between groups (median, IBM 7 months vs. NIBM 4 months, P = 0.08).

Conclusion:

Taken together, our data suggest that for cervical cancer patients with brain metastasis intracranial metastasis itself (and not overall tumor burden) represent a sentinel event in limiting longevity. While the present study is underpowered to compare treatment options directly, further work should be focused on determining the optimal treatment for these patients.

Rare Distant Metastatic Disease of Ovarian and Peritoneal Carcinomatosis: A Review of the Literature

Background: Although metastases of ovarian and peritoneal carcinomatosis are most commonly found within the peritoneal cavity, there is a number of other rare distant sites that have been reported. Our goal is to provide an evidence-based summary of the available literature considering the rare distant metastatic sites of ovarian and peritoneal carcinomatosis. Methods: A comprehensive search of the literature was conducted, with Medline/PubMed being searched for cases of rare metastatic disease originated from primary ovarian and peritoneal cancer with related articles up to 2019 including terms such as "ovarian cancer", "metastases", "peritoneal" and others. Results: The most common mechanism of ovarian cancer metastases consists of primarily dissemination within the peritoneal cavity, while, rare and distant sites can either occur at the beginning or during the course of the disease and they are usually associated with hematogenous route and lymphatic invasion, having poor prognosis, with the least common sites being skin, bone, CNS, eye, placenta, central airways, rare lymph nodes, intra-abdominal organs, heart and breast. Conclusions: The occurrence of metastatic sites described in this review represents the most common rare distant metastatic sites, and even though their patterns of metastases are still not fully clarified due to the rarity of the reports, they offer valuable information considering the pathophysiology of the disease.

Clinical presentation of brain metastases from endometrial carcinoma: A case series

Brain metastases from endometrial carcinoma are rare, however they do occur, and they are associated with an especially poor prognosis. There is evidence demonstrating improved outcomes with early diagnosis and subsequent multimodal treatment. This study therefore aims to review cases of brain metastases from endometrial carcinoma with specific focus on clinical presentation and disease history. This retrospective case series evaluated all cases of brain metastases from endometrial carcinoma at a single institution over a seven-year period. A medical records search was performed using ICD codes for endometrial cancer, brain lesions and brain imaging. Analysis of patient and disease characteristics was performed with descriptive statistics. Twelve cases were identified. The majority of cases had intermediate or high-grade histology (97.7%), advanced stage disease (58.3%), and at least one prior disease recurrence (66.7%). Eleven of 12 cases (91.7%) had lung metastases diagnosed prior to brain metastases. All 12 cases had neurologic signs and symptoms present at time of brain metastases diagnosis; 14 different types of neurologic deficits were noted. Headache was the most common neurologic symptom (5/12, 41.7%), followed by focal weakness (3/12, 25.0%) and aphasia (3/12, 25.0%). In conclusion, clinical presentation at time of diagnosis of brain metastases consistently includes neurologic signs and symptoms with persistent headache being the most common. Endometrial cancer patients that present with new neurologic complaints or exam findings should be evaluated for brain metastases.

•

Brain metastases from endometrial cancer are rare

•

Most cases occur in high grade, advanced stage disease with other metastatic sites

•

Patients with brain metastases present with neurologic symptoms

•

Common neurologic symptoms on presentation are headache, focal weakness and aphasia

•

Persistent neurologic symptoms warrant evaluation for brain metastases

Epithelial Ovarian Carcinoma Associated with Metastases to Central Nervous System: Two Case Reports

We experienced two rare cases of metastases to the central nervous system (cerebral and leptomeningeal metastases) from primary epithelial ovarian carcinoma. The first case was a 55-year-old woman who developed carcinomatous meningitis while on chemotherapy for ovarian cancer stage IIIC. Cytological analysis confirmed carcinomatous cells of ovarian origin in the cerebrospinal fluid. Magnetic resonance imaging demonstrated abnormal hyperintensity in the cerebral sulci on fluid attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) sequence with enhanced gadolinium indicating leptomeningeal metastases. Her consciousness rapidly declined and she died 42 days after diagnosis. The second case was a 63-year-old woman who underwent surgery for ovarian cancer and who was diagnosed as stage IA. Thirty-eight months after surgery, she developed weakness of the left hand and headaches. A CT scan revealed metastases to the right cerebrum and she was treated with surgical resection followed by radiotherapy. Five months after resection, she developed ileus caused by multiple relapses in the pelvis. Despite chemotherapy, her performance status declined and she died nine months after the resection. Both cases were rare because the first case was isolated leptomeningeal metastases, and the second case was confirmed relapse site in the cerebrum due to neurological symptoms despite her early clinical stage.

Androgen receptor status predicts development of brain metastases in ovarian cancers

Brain metastases are uncommon localizations in epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC), their reported incidence is increasing and no predictive biomarkers have been identified yet. Goals of this study were: i) to define a possible association between Estrogen Receptor (ER), Progesterone Receptor (PR), Androgen Receptor (AR), human EGF receptor 2 (HER2) and brain progression in EOC patients, and ii) to identify differences in ER, PR, AR and HER2 protein expression from primary EOC and its matched resected brain metastasis. A retrospective series of 11 EOC with matched brain metastasis surgically removed was collected. For comparison, a “Control dataset” of 22 patients, without evidence of brain involvement after an adequate follow up was matched. ER, PR, AR and HER2 status were analyzed by means of immunohistochemistry forCases (both primary and metastatic lesions) and Controls.

Univariate analysis showed that AR status was significantly associated with brain localization, both considered as discrete variable (cut-off: 10%, p=0.013) and as continuous one (p=0.035). Multivariate analysis confirmed this trend (p=0.053). When considered as continuous variables, ER and AR showed greater expression in primary tumors in comparison with brain metastases (p=0.013 and p=0.032, respectively).

In our series, AR predicts brain involvement, with a 9.5 times higher propensity for AR-negative EOC. Moreover, brain dissemination is probably the result of progressive dedifferentiation of primary tumor, shown by reduction of ER and AR expression in metastases. Further studies are required, in order to anticipate and improve multimodal treatment of brain metastases.

A New Scoring Tool to Assess Overall Survival in Patients With Intracerebral Metastases From Gynecological Cancers

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to facilitate individualized treatment strategies for intracerebral metastases from gynecological cancers by creating a specific overall survival (OS) score.

METHODS/MATERIALS

Fifty-six patients irradiated for cerebral metastases from gynecological cancers were included. Eleven factors were retrospectively analyzed for OS: age, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance score, cancer type, histology, histologic grading, initial stage, number of lesions, extracerebral metastases, time between cancer diagnosis and brain metastases treatment, recursive partitioning analysis class, and type of treatment. Independent predictors of OS were incorporated in the score (better OS, 1 point; worse OS, 0 points).

RESULTS

On Cox proportional hazards analysis, performance score (hazards ratio, 1.98; 95% confidence interval, 1.30-3.23; P = 0.001), no extracerebral metastases (3.34; 1.46-8.96; P = 0.003), and recursive partitioning analysis class 1 (3.27; 1.97-5.65; P < 0.001) were significant. The following points were assigned: ECOG score 1 to 2 = 1 point, ECOG score 3 to 4 = 0 points, no extracerebral metastases = 1 point, extracerebral metastases = 0 points. Sum scores were 0 (n = 32), 1 (n = 15), or 2 points (n = 9). Six-month OS rates were 6%, 67%, and 100%, respectively (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

A predictive tool including 3 groups with significantly different OS probabilities was designed for patients with cerebral metastases from gynecological cancers. This tool will aid in choosing individual treatments.

Is Neurosurgery With Adjuvant Radiotherapy an Effective Treatment Modality in Isolated Brain Involvement From Endometrial Cancer?: From Case Report to Analysis

AIM

The aim of this study was to evaluate the treatment options and post-brain involvement survival (PBIS) of patients with isolated brain involvement from endometrial cancer (EC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The literature electronic search was conducted from 1972 to May 2016 to identify articles about isolated (without extracranial metastases) brain involvement from EC at recurrence and the initial diagnosis. Forty-eight articles were found. After comprehensive evaluation of case series and case reports, the study included 49 cases.

RESULTS

The median age of the patients at initial diagnosis was 57 years (range, 40-77 years). Poor differentiation was determined in 36 (73.5%) patients. Thirty-five (71.4%) patients had a single brain lesion. Lesion was found in the supratentorial part of the brain in 33 (67.3%) patients. Median PBIS for all cohorts was 13 months (range, 0.25-118 months) with 2-year PBIS of 52% and 5-year PBIS of 37%. Age, tumor type, grade, disease-free interval, diagnosis time of brain lesion, localization, and number of brain lesion were not predictive of PBIS. Two-year PBIS was 77% in patients who underwent surgical resection and radiotherapy, whereas it was 19% in the surgical resection-only group, and 20% in the primary radiotherapy-only group (Ps = 0.003 and 0.001, respectively). Chemotherapy was not associated with improved PBIS.

CONCLUSIONS

Although neuroinvasion from EC appears mostly with a disseminated disease, there is a considerable amount of patients with isolated brain involvement who would have a higher chance of curability. Surgery with radiotherapy is the rational current management option, and this improves the survival for isolated brain involvement from EC.

Prognostic factors for patients with brain metastasis from gynecological cancer: a significance of treatment-free interval of more than 6 months

Objective

Treatment-free interval has been confirmed as a significant prognostic factor in recurrent gynecological cancers. However, treatment-free interval has not been evaluated in previous studies investigating brain metastasis from gynecological malignancies. The aim of the study was to establish a predictive model of survival period after brain metastasis from gynecological cancer.

Methods

Of a total of 2848 patients with gynecological cancer, patients with brain metastasis were included in the study. Data at the time of brain metastasis diagnosis, which included primary origin, presence of extracranial metastasis, the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status, the number of brain metastases, brain-metastasis free-interval, treatment-free interval and treatment for brain metastasis were collected. Survival data were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier methods and Cox proportional hazards models.

Results

Incidences of brain metastasis were 1.7% (47/2848). Median survival period after diagnosis of brain metastasis was 20 weeks (4-5 months). The 6-, 12- and 24-month survival rates after brain metastasis were 44.0%, 22.0% and 16.5%, respectively. Cox regression analysis showed that extracranial metastasis (hazard ratio [HR], 5.2; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.04-26.3), ECOG performance status of 3-4 (HR, 3.1; 95% CI: 1.20-7.91), treatment-free interval of <6 months (HR, 3.8; 95% CI: 1.09-13.1), and no anti-cancer treatment for brain metastasis (HR, 3.6; 95% CI: 1.34-9.41) were significantly and independently related to poor survival.

Conclusion

Treatment-free interval should be assessed in a future study to verify prognostic predictors of brain metastasis from gynecological cancer.

Outcomes in 20 Gynecologic Cancer Patient with Brain Metastasis: A Single Institution Retrospective Study

BACKGROUND

The incidence of brain metastasis (BM) in gynecologic cancers has risen recently, due to prolonged survival times and an early diagnosis. We analyzed treatment outcomes of patients with BM from gynecologic cancers.

METHODS

Among 951 patients with BM who were treated in neurosurgical department from July 2003 to February 2016, a total of 20 (2%) patients were from gynecologic cancers. The patients' clinical characteristics were collected by using medical records. There were 14 (66.7%) ovarian cancers, 4 (19.0%) uterine cancers, and 2 (9.5%) cervical cancers. As a primary treatment modality, 11 patients were treated with Gamma Knife surgery (GKS), 6 with surgical resection followed by whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT), and 3 with WBRT only. Overall and progression-free survival according to the primary origin and the primary treatment were analyzed.

RESULTS

Median overall survival time was 28 months, and progression-free survival was 15 months. In patients with ovarian cancer, median overall survival did not reach during the follow-up periods and progression-free survival time was 15 months. Median overall survival time in patients who received GKS as the primary treatment was 17 months and that in patients who underwent surgical resection followed by WBRT was 37.3 months (p=0.16). The median value of progression-free survival time in patients who received GKS as the primary treatment was 12 months and that in patients who underwent surgical resection with WBRT was 42 months (p=0.042). Median follow up period of over all patients was 13 months.

CONCLUSION

BM from gynecologic cancer is rare (2%), but our findings suggest that the prognosis might not always be poor. In our small series, surgical resection with WBRT was a treatment modality significantly associated with a longer progression-free survival. Additional studies with more cases and multi-institutional cooperation are needed to determine which treatment modality leads to better outcomes.

Cervical cancer metastasis to the brain: A case report and review of literature

Background:

Intracranial metastasis from cervical cancer is a rare occurrence.

Methods:

In this study we describe a case of cervical cancer metastasis to the brain and perform an extensive review of literature from 1956 to 2016, to characterize clearly the clinical presentation, treatment options, molecular markers, targeted therapies, and survival of patients with this condition.

Results:

An elderly woman with history of cervical cancer in remission, presented 2 years later with a right temporo-parietal tumor, which was treated with surgery and subsequent stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) to the resection cavity. She then returned 5 months later with a second solitary right lesion; she again underwent surgery and SRS to the resection cavity with no signs of recurrence 6 months later. According to the reviewed literature, the most common clinical presentation included females with median age of 48 years; presenting symptoms such as headache, weakness/hemiplegia/hemiparesis, seizure, and altered mental status (AMS)/confusion; multiple lesions mostly supratentorially located; poorly differentiated squamous cell carcinoma; and additional recurrences at other sites. The best approach to treatment is a multimodal plan, consisting of SRS or whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT) for solitary brain metastases followed by chemotherapy for systemic disease, surgery and WBRT for solitary brain lesions without systemic disease, and SRS or WBRT followed by chemotherapy for palliative care. The overall prognosis is poor with a mean and median survival time from diagnosis of brain metastasis of 7 and 4.6 months, respectively.

Conclusion:

Future efforts through large prospective randomized trials are warranted to better describe the clinical presentation and identify more effective treatment plans.

Pazopanib-mediated long-term disease stabilization after resection of a uterine leiomyosarcoma metastasis to the brain: A case report

A 48-year-old woman underwent a total abdominal hysterectomy after preoperative diagnosis of multiple uterine leiomyomas. The histopathological diagnosis was leiomyosarcoma (LMS). After 47 months, multiple lung metastases were detected and resected. The patient was also diagnosed with pelvic bone metastasis and received six cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine plus docetaxel and local radiation therapy to control the pain. Seventy-seven months from the initial diagnosis, she had a headache and developed left hemiparesis and aphasia. Imaging studies detected a solitary brain metastasis in the right frontal lobe. The patient underwent a craniotomy and resection of the lesion, which was a confirmed metastasis from uterine LMS by histopathology. One month after the craniotomy, the patient experienced lower abdominal pain, and a pelvic metastasis was detected. She was prescribed oral pazopanib (800 mg per day). For twelve months, she remained asymptomatic, but gradually, pelvic pain increased due to pelvic mass growth. After 14 months of pazopanib treatment, pazopanib was discontinued. To date, for 18 months after the brain surgery, she is alive with disease, and the brain metastasis has not recurred.

•

Pazopanib might benefit patients with uterine leiomyosarcoma brain metastasis.

•

Pazopanib may control uterine leiomyosarcoma brain metastasis and systemic disease.

•

Long-term disease stabilization was gained after pazopanib treatment.

Brain Metastases in Patients with Gynecologic Cancers: A Single Institution Experience and Review of the Literature

Objective:

Brain Metastasis (BM) from primary gynecologic cancers is a rare entity. The advances and successes in the treatment of primary gynecologic malignancies, have led to prolonged survival and, a higher incidence of BM. This study aims to report the experience at our institution in managing these patients, and provide possible data points that may be essential to note as prognostic factors, and see if our findings are consistent with the literature in this subject. We also aim to provide a brief literature review of patients with gynecologic cancers and BM.

Methods:

This is a small single institution retrospective study of 23 patients with a gynecologic malignancy and BM, identified between the years 2007–2015. Data were collected on variables including patient demographics, disease and treatment.

Results:

The median overall survival from the primary diagnosis was 28 months. Median time from diagnosis of BM to death was 9 months.

Conclusion:

The outcomes in our study are similar to what is stated in the current literature with regard to BM from gynecologic malignancies. Our literature search also revealed that the molecular analysis and treatment of the primary tumor remain important to prevent BMs. The tendency of tumors to metastasize varies for one tumor type to another for the same type of tumor. The tendency to develop BM may not only depend on risk factors such as stage, grade, and histology, but also on the genetic profile of the primary tumor. The study suggests that multimodal treatment of BM has better outcomes in managing BM from gynecologic cancers.

Factors Predictive of Improved Survival in Patients With Brain Metastases From Gynecologic Cancer: A Single Institution Retrospective Study of 47 Cases and Review of the Literature

OBJECTIVE

The reported incidence of brain metastasis from epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC), endometrial cancer (EC), and cervical cancer (CC) is exceedingly rare. As the long-term survival for patients with gynecologic cancer increases, there has been a corresponding increase in the number of diagnosed intracranial metastases. We seek to report our experience with managing brain metastatic disease (BMD) in patients with gynecologic cancer.

METHODS

A retrospective review of all patients with EOC, EC, and CC at our institution revealed 47 patients with concurrent BMD between 2000 and 2013. Demographic data, risk factors, treatment modalities, progression-free data, and overall survival data were collected.

RESULTS

Median survival time in patients with brain metastasis from EOC, EC, and CC was 9.0, 4.5, and 3.0 months, respectively. Two-year overall survival rates were 31.6%, 13.6%, and 0%, respectively. Patients received surgery, radiation therapy alone, palliative care, or radiation plus surgery. Radiation combined with surgical resection resulted in a significant hazards ratio of 0.36 (95% confidence interval, 0.15-0.86), compared with radiation alone.

CONCLUSIONS

Our report provides a large single-institution experience of brain metastases from gynecologic cancer. Patients with BMD have poor prognoses; however, treatment with multimodal therapy including surgical resection and radiation may prolong overall survival.

Clinical Outcomes of Gamma Knife Radiosurgery for Metastatic Brain Tumors from Gynecologic Cancer : Prognostic Factors in Local Treatment Failure and Survival

Objective

Brain metastases in gynecologic cancer (ovarian, endometrial, and cervical cancer) patients are rare, and the efficacy of Gamma Knife Radiosurgery (GKRS) to treat these had not been evaluated. We assessed the efficacy of GKRS and prognostic factors for tumor control and survival in brain metastasis from gynecologic cancers.

Methods

This retrospective study was approved by the institutional review board. From May 1995 to October 2012, 26 women (mean age 51.3 years, range 27–70 years) with metastatic brain tumors from gynecologic cancer were treated with GKRS. We reviewed their outcomes, radiological responses, and clinical status.

Results

In total 24 patients (59 lesions) were available for follow-up imaging. The median follow-up time was 9 months. The mean treated tumor volume at the time of GKRS was 8185 mm³ (range 10–19500 mm³), and the median dose delivered to the tumor margin was 25 Gy (range, 10–30 Gy). A local tumor control rate was 89.8% (53 of 59 tumors). The median overall survival was 9.5 months after GKRS (range, 1–102 months). Age-associated multivariate analysis indicated that the Karnofsky performance status (KPS), the recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) classification, and the number of treated lesions were significant prognostic factors for overall survival (HR=0.162, p=0.008, HR=0.107, p=0.038, and HR=2.897, p=0.045, respectively).

Conclusion

GKRS is safe and effective for the management of brain metastasis from gynecologic cancers. The clinical status of the patient is important in determining the overall survival time.

Clinicopathologic characteristics and survival of patients with gynecologic malignancies metastatic to the brain

OBJECTIVE

No standardized treatment strategies exist for patients with gynecologic malignancies complicated by brain metastases. Identification of poor outcome characteristics, long-term survival indicators, and molecular markers could help individualize and optimize treatment.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included 100 gynecologic cancer patients with brain metastases treated at our institution between January 1990 and June 2009. Primary outcome was overall survival (OS) from time of diagnosis of brain metastases. We used univariate and multivariate analyses to evaluate associations between OS and clinical factors. We used immunohistochemistry to examine expression of five molecular markers in primary tumors and brain metastases in a subset of patients and matched controls. Statistical tests included the Student's paired t-test (for marker expression) and Kaplan-Meier test (for correlations).

RESULTS

On univariate analysis, primary ovarian disease, CA-125<81units/mL at brain metastases diagnosis, and isolated versus multi-focal metastases were all associated with longer survival. Isolated brain metastasis remained the only significant predictor on multivariate analysis (HR 2.66; CI 1.19-5.93; p=0.017). Expression of vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGF-A) was higher in metastatic brain samples than in primary tumors of controls (p<0.0001). None of the molecular markers were significantly associated with survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Multi-modality therapy may lead to improved clinical outcomes, and VEGF therapy should be investigated in treatment of brain metastases.

Central nervous system metastasis in gynecologic cancer: symptom management, prognosis and palliative management strategies

INTRODUCTION

CNS metastasis (CNSmet) with gynecologic malignancy (GM) is associated with poor prognosis and symptom burden. Two prognostic indices, the recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) and graded prognostic assessment (GPA), used in other solid tumors to guide intervention options were evaluated among GM patients.

METHODS

Retrospective chart review was performed to identify patients with primary GM diagnosed with CNSmet from 2005-2014. RPA and GPA were applied and evaluated for goodness of fit. Long-term survivors (LTS) were those with survival time from CNSmet ≥9 months.

RESULTS

35 patients were identified with median age of 62 years (range, 41-78). The majority had ovarian cancer (54%). Median survival was 4.5 months (0.1-25.9), and median time from initial diagnosis was 2.6 years (0-19.6). Presenting symptoms varied but headache (57%) and altered mental status (23%) were most common. 37% had a solitary CNS lesion, 31% had 2-8, and 31% >8. 57% were treated with WBRT, 14% with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), and 20% with combinations of treatments, and 2 elected for hospice. 27% (9/33) of the patients were LTS. The GPA was not significantly associated with patient outcome (p=0.46). The RPA predicted time to death (p=.0010).

CONCLUSION

Prognostic indices used to guide therapeutic interventions perform poorly in GM. Detection and aggressive symptom management are critical in maintaining QOL. Multidisciplinary consultation is critical to optimize outcomes and symptom control.

Uterine cervical cancer with brain metastasis as the initial site of presentation

Brain metastasis from uterine cervical cancer is rare, with an incidence of 0.5%, and usually occurs late in the course of the disease. We report a case of uterine cervical cancer with brain metastasis as the initial site of presentation. A 50-year-old woman with headache, vertigo, amnesia and loss of appetite was admitted for persistent vomiting. Contrast enhanced computed tomography showed a solitary right frontal cerebral lesion with ring enhancement and uterine cervical tumor. She was diagnosed with uterine cervical squamous cell carcinoma with parametrium invasion and no other distant affected organs were detected. The cerebral lesion was surgically removed and pathologically proved to be metastasis of uterine cervical squamous cell carcinoma. The patient underwent concurrent chemoradiotherapy, followed by cerebral radiation therapy, but multiple metastases to the liver and lung developed and the patient died 7 months after diagnosis of brain metastasis.

Metastatic ovarian carcinoma to the brain: an approach to identification and classification for neuropathologists

Brain metastasis is an uncommon but increasing manifestation of ovarian epithelial carcinoma and neuropathologists' collective experience with these tumors is limited. We present clinicopathological characteristics of 13 cases of brain metastases from ovarian epithelial carcinoma diagnosed at two academic institutions. The mean ages at diagnosis of the ovarian carcinoma and their subsequent brain metastases were 58.7 and 62.8 years, respectively. At the time of initial diagnosis of ovarian carcinoma the majority of patients had an advanced stage and none had brain metastases as their first manifestation of malignancy. Brain metastases tended to be multiple with ring-enhancing features on neuroimaging. Primary tumors and their brain metastases were all high-grade histologically and the histologic subtypes were: nine high-grade serous carcinoma (HGSC) cases, two clear cell carcinoma (CCC) cases and a single case each of carcinosarcoma and high-grade adenocarcinoma. A recommended histo- and immunopathological approach to these tumours are provided to aid neuropathologists in the recognition and classification of metastatic ovarian carcinoma to the brain.

Gamma knife radiosurgery for the treatment of gynecologic malignancies metastasizing to the brain: clinical article

Gynecologic malignancies represent some of the commonest causes of cancer in the female population. Despite their overall high prevalence, gynecologic malignancies have seldom been reported to metastasize to the brain. The incidence of gynecologic cancers spreading to the brain has been rising, and the optimal management of these patients is not well defined. A retrospective analysis of patients treated over the past ten years with gamma knife radiosurgery (GKRS) for metastatic gynecologic cancer to the brain was performed. Radiographic treatment response, tumor control, metastatic disease progression and survival data were analyzed. Eight patients with ovarian cancer, six patients with endometrial cancer and two separates who carried a diagnosis of cervical cancer or leiomyosarcoma harbored metastatic disease to the brain that was treated with GKRS. The median dose to the tumor margin was 20 Gy (range 10-22 Gy), and the median maximum radiosurgical dose was 31 Gy (range 16-52.9 Gy). Tumor control was achieved in all patients who had follow up imaging studies. Patients with ovarian cancer had prolonged median survival following GKRS compared to patients with endometrial cancer (22.3 vs 8.3 months, p = 0.02). The patient with cervical cancer survived 8 months following her GKRS in the setting of metastatic brain tumor progression, whereas the patient with leiomyosarcoma passed away within several weeks of treatment secondary to disseminated extracranial primary disease. GKRS is a safe and effective means of achieving intracranial tumor control for patients with gynecologic cancer that has spread to the brain.

Late Isolated Central Nervous System Relapse from Ovarian Serous Adenocarcinoma: A Case Report and Literature Review

Central nervous system involvement by ovarian serous adenocarcinoma is rare. We report a case of a 60-year-old woman that developed brain metastasis as isolated site of relapse 4.5 years after a complete resection and adjuvant chemotherapy for a stage Ic disease. She proceeded to a craniotomy with resection of the lesion and, subsequently, to a whole brain radiotherapy. Nineteen months later, she developed carcinomatous meningitis as isolated site of recurrence. Patient was submitted to intrathecal chemotherapy with methotrexate; however, she died from progressive neurologic involvement disease few weeks later.

Radiation therapy for epithelial ovarian cancer brain metastases: clinical outcomes and predictors of survival

BACKGROUND

Brain metastases (BM) and leptomeningeal disease (LMD) are uncommon in epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). We investigate the outcomes of modern radiation therapy (RT) as a primary treatment modality in patients with EOC BM and LMD.

METHODS

We evaluated 60 patients with EOC treated at our institution from 1996 to 2010 who developed BM. All information was obtained from chart review.

RESULTS

At EOC diagnosis, median age was 56.1 years and 88% of patients were stage III-IV. At time of BM diagnosis, 46.7% of patients had 1 BM, 16.7% had two to three, 26.7% had four or more, and 10% had LMD. Median follow-up after BM was 9.3 months (range, 0.3-82.3). All patients received RT, and 37% had surgical resection. LMD occurred in the primary or recurrent setting in 12 patients (20%), 9 of whom received RT. Median overall survival (OS) after BM was 9.7 months for all patients (95% CI 5.9-13.5), and 16.1 months (95% CI 3.8-28.3) in patients with one BM. On multivariate analysis, Karnofsky performance status less than 70 (hazard ratio [HR] 2.86, p = 0.018), four or more BM (HR 3.18, p = 0.05), LMD (HR 8.22, p = 0.013), and uncontrolled primary tumor (HR 2.84, p = 0.008) were significantly associated with inferior OS. Use of surgery was not significant (p = 0.31). Median central nervous system freedom from progression (CNS-FFP) in 47 patients with follow-up was 18.5 months (95% CI, 9.3-27.9). Only four or more BM (HR 2.56, p = 0.04) was significantly associated with poorer CNS-FFP.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on our results, RT appears to be an effective treatment modality for brain metastases from EOC and should be routinely offered. Karnofsky performance status less than 70, four or more BM, LMD, and uncontrolled primary tumor predict for worse survival after RT for EOC BM. Whether RT is superior to surgery or chemotherapy for EOC BM remains to be seen in a larger cohort.