A phase II evaluation of gefitinib in the treatment of persistent or recurrent endometrial cancer: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study

Locally advanced and metastatic endometrial cancer: Current and emerging therapies

Until recently, patients diagnosed with locally advanced and metastatic endometrial cancer faced significant challenges in their treatment due to limited options and poor prognostic outcomes. The sequencing of tumors has been a major advancement in its management. It has led to The Cancer Genome Atlas classification currently used in clinical practice and the initiation of several clinical trials for innovative treatments targeting principally signaling pathways, immune checkpoints, DNA integrity, growth factors, hormonal signaling, and metabolism. Numerous clinical trials are investigating a combinatorial approach of these targeted therapies to counter tumoral resistance, cellular compensatory mechanisms, and tumor polyclonality. This review provides a comprehensive overview of historical, current, and promising therapies in advanced and metastatic endometrial cancer. It particularly highlights clinical research on targeted and hormonal therapies, but also immunotherapy, reflecting the evolving landscape of treatment modalities for this disease.

Radiotherapy and Chemotherapy Features in the Treatment for Locoregional Recurrence of Endometrial Cancer: A Systematic Review

Radiation therapy (RT) is the standard of care in patients with locoregional or isolated vaginal recurrence who never underwent irradiation. It is often associated with brachytherapy (BT), whereas chemotherapy (CT) is a rare treatment option. We systematically searched the PubMed and Scopus databases in February 2023. We included patients with relapsed endometrial cancer, describing the treatment of locoregional recurrence, and reporting at least one outcome of interest-disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), recurrence rate (RR), site of recurrence, and major complications. A total of 15 studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Overall, 11 evaluated RT only, 3 evaluated CT, and 1 analyzed oncological outcomes after administration with a combination of CT and RT. In total, 4.5-year OS ranged from 16% to 96%, and DFS ranged from 36.3% to 100% at 4.5 years. RR ranged from 3.7% to 98.2% during a median follow-up of 51.5 months. Overall, RT showed a 4.5-year DFS from 40% to 100%. CT revealed 36.3% DFS at 4.5 years. RT showed a 4.5-year OS ranging from 16% to 96%, whereas CT revealed a 27.7% OS rate. It would be appropriate to test multi-modality regimens to evaluate outcomes and toxicity. EBRT and BT are the most employed options to treat vaginal recurrences.

Evaluation of the efficacy of systemic therapy for advanced uterine leiomyosarcoma: A systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression analysis

Uterine leiomyosarcoma (uLMS) is an aggressive mesenchymal neoplasm associated with a poor prognosis. Systemic chemotherapy is the standard therapy for patients with uLMS. However, it is unclear which treatment regimen results in the most favorable clinical outcome. We performed a meta-analysis and meta-regression analysis to assess the efficiency of different treatments received by patients with advanced, metastatic, and relapsing uLMS by evaluating the objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) as primary endpoints. The frequentist random effects meta-analysis model was used to compare the outcomes of different treatment regimens for advanced uLMS. A meta-regression analysis was performed to estimate the association between the study-specific hazard ratios and specific demographic variables. A meta-analysis of 51 reports including 1664 patients was conducted. Among patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy (916 patients; 55%), gemcitabine and docetaxel were the most frequently used drugs. First-line monotherapy with alkylating agents (pooled ORR = 0.48; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.44-0.52) and second-line monotherapy with protein kinase inhibitors (pooled ORR = 0.45; 95% CI: 0.39-0.52) resulted in favorable prognoses. The combinations of anthracycline plus alkylating therapy (pooled DCR = 0.74; 95% CI: 0.67-0.79) and of gemcitabine plus docetaxel (pooled DCR = 0.70; 95% CI: 0.63-0.75) showed the greatest benefits when used as first-line and second-line chemotherapies, respectively. Subgroup meta-analysis results revealed that dual-regimen therapies comprising anthracycline plus alkylating therapy and gemcitabine plus docetaxel are practical therapeutic choices for International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stages III-IVb with distant metastases when assessed by computed tomography (p = 0.001). Furthermore, neoadjuvant chemotherapy and local radiotherapy resulted in favorable outcomes for patients with earlier stages of distant relapsed uLMS (p < 0.001). Our findings provide a basis for designing new therapeutic strategies and can potentially guide clinical practice toward better prognoses for uLMS patients with advanced, metastatic, and relapsing disease.

Expression of EGFR isoform D is regulated by HER receptor activators in breast cancer cells

Human epidermal growth factor receptor isoform D (EGFR; isoform D) is a soluble protein from a 3 kb alternate mRNA transcript that arises from the human EGFR gene. Several studies have identified this circulating isoform of EGFR as a potential diagnostic biomarker for the detection of early stage of cancers. While the expression of the full-length EGFR (isoform A) is regulated by its cognate ligand, EGF, as well as by phorbol myristate acetate (PMA), no studies have examined the factors regulating the expression of EGFR isoform D. In this study, using breast cancer cell lines, we show that the HER receptor ligands, EGF and neuregulin (NRG-1β), as well as the phorbol ester, PMA, can increase the expression of EGFR isoform D, as well as isoform A. Our results, based on measurement of mRNA levels, suggest that EGF induced expression of both isoform A and isoform D occur through a mitogen activated protein kinase (MAPK)-dependent mechanism, and also suggest that protein kinase C is involved in PMA-induced regulation of both isoforms. We also demonstrate that NRG-1β increases isoform A and isoform D expression via the MAPK-dependent pathway, but this regulation occurs independently of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/Akt activation. These results suggest that regulation of EGFR isoform A and isoform D expression occur using similar mechanisms. Despite commonalities in the transcriptional regulation of these two EGFR isoforms, the half-lives of these two transcripts is quite different. Moreover, EGFR isoform D, unlike isoform A, is not post-transcriptionally modulated by EGFR activators in the breast cancer cell line MDA-MB-468.

Recurrent Endometrial Cancer: Local and Systemic Treatment Options

The treatment of recurrent endometrial cancer is a challenge. Because of earlier treatments and the site of locoregional recurrence, in the vaginal vault or pelvis, morbidity can be high. A total of about 4 to 20% of the patients with endometrial cancer develop a locoregional recurrence, mostly among patients with locally advanced disease. The treatment options are dependent on previous treatments and the site of recurrence. Local and locoregional recurrences can be treated curatively with surgery or (chemo)radiotherapy with acceptable toxicity and control rates. Distant recurrences can be treated with palliative systemic therapy, i.e., first-line chemotherapy or hormonal therapy. Based on the tumor characteristics and molecular profile, there can be a role for immunotherapy. The evidence on targeted therapy is limited, with no approved treatment in the current guidelines. In selected cases, there might be an indication for local treatment in oligometastatic disease. Because of the novel techniques in radiotherapy, disease control can often be achieved at limited toxicity. Further studies are warranted to analyze the survival outcome and toxicity of newer treatment strategies. Patient selection is very important in deciding which treatment is of most benefit, and better prediction models based on the patient- and tumor characteristics are necessary.

Pharmacological Treatment of Advanced, Persistent or Metastatic Endometrial Cancer: State of the Art and Perspectives of Clinical Research for the Special Issue "Diagnosis and Management of Endometrial Cancer"

Patients with metastatic or recurrent endometrial cancer (EC) not suitable for surgery and/or radiotherapy are candidates for pharmacological treatment frequently with unsatisfactory clinical outcomes. The purpose of this paper was to review the results obtained with chemotherapy, hormonal therapy, biological agents and immune checkpoint inhibitors in this clinical setting. The combination of carboplatin (CBDCA) + paclitaxel (PTX) is the standard first-line chemotherapy capable of achieving objective response rates (ORRs) of 43-62%, a median progression-free survival (PFS) of 5.3-15 months and a median overall survival (OS) of 13.2-37.0 months, respectively, whereas hormonal therapy is sometimes used in selected patients with slow-growing steroid receptor-positive EC. The combination of endocrine therapy with m-TOR inhibitors or cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors is currently under evaluation. Disappointing ORRs have been associated with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitors, HER-2 inhibitors and multi-tyrosine kinase inhibitors used as single agents, and clinical trials evaluating the addition of bevacizumab to CBDCA + PTX have reported conflicting results. Immune checkpoint inhibitors, and especially pembrolizumab and dostarlimab, have achieved an objective response in 27-47% of highly pretreated patients with microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H)/mismatch repair (MMR)-deficient (-d) EC. In a recent study, the combination of lenvatinib + pembrolizumab produced a 24-week response rate of 38% in patients with highly pretreated EC, ranging from 64% in patients with MSI-H/MMR-d to 36% in those with microsatellite stable/MMR-proficient tumors. Four trials are currently investigating the addition of immune checkpoint inhibitors to PTX + CBDCA in primary advanced or recurrent EC, and two trials are comparing pembrolizumab + lenvatinib versus either CBDCA + PTX as a first-line treatment of advanced or recurrent EC or versus single-agent chemotherapy in advanced, recurrent or metastatic EC after one prior platinum-based chemotherapy.

Phase 2 study of cetuximab (Erbitux) in patients with progressive or recurrent endometrial cancer

INTRODUCTION

Overexpression of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) found in common subtypes of endometrial cancer has been associated with advanced stage disease and a poor prognosis. The purpose of this phase 2 study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of cetuximab in patients with recurrent endometrial cancer.

METHODS

The study was an open-label phase 2 clinical trial conducted at two institutions. Patients with recurrent or progressive endometrial cancer of any histologic type with the exception of uterine sarcoma received cetuximab at an initial dose of 400 mg/m² IV followed by weekly doses of 250 mg/m². One cycle was considered 4 weeks of treatment. The primary efficacy endpoint was clinical benefit response, defined as a complete or partial response or prolonged stable disease (>8 weeks) by RECIST 1.0 criteria.

RESULTS

A total of 30 patients were enrolled with a median age of 64 years (range 42-83). Of the 20 evaluable patients, three (15%) had clinical benefit response (one complete response, two stable disease). The patient with a clinical benefit response received a total of 27 cycles and the two patients with stable disease were taken off the study due to progression after four and six cycles, respectively. Of the 10 inevaluable patients, nine received ≤1 cycle due to clinical deterioration and one had an anaphylactic reaction. One patient had a grade 3 rash which resolved after a delay in treatment. No dose reduction was reported.

CONCLUSIONS

In this cohort, single agent therapy with cetuximab was well tolerated and had a 15% clinical benefit response. Further studies are required to better identify patients who may respond to this treatment.

Small-Molecule Inhibitors (SMIs) as an Effective Therapeutic Strategy for Endometrial Cancer

Endometrial cancer (EC) is the sixth most common cancer in women. A continued number of low-risk EC patients at diagnosis, as well as patients diagnosed with advanced-stage disease, will experience an aggressive disease. Unfortunately, those patients will present recurrence or overt dissemination. Systemic cytotoxic chemotherapy treatment on advanced, recurrent, or metastatic EC patients has shown poor results, with median survival rates of less than one year, and median progression-free survival rates of four months. Therefore, the search for innovative and alternative drugs or the development of combinatorial therapies involving new targeted drugs and standard regimens is imperative. Over the last few decades, some small-molecule inhibitors have been introduced in the clinics for cancer treatment, but only a few have been approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for EC treatment. In the present review, we present the current state and future prospects of small-molecule inhibitors on EC treatment, both alone and in combination.

Immunotherapy in endometrial cancer: new scenarios on the horizon

This extensive review summarizes clinical evidence on immunotherapy and targeted therapy currently available for endometrial cancer (EC) and reports the results of the clinical trials and ongoing studies. The research was carried out collecting preclinical and clinical findings using keywords such as immune environment, tumor infiltrating lymphocytes, programmed death-1 (PD-1)/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression, immune checkpoint inhibitors, anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies and others' on PubMed. Finally, we looked for the ongoing immunotherapy trials on ClinicalTrials.gov. EC is the fourth most common malignancy in women in developed countries. Despite medical and surgical treatments, survival has not improved in the last decade and death rates have increased for uterine cancer in women. Therefore, identification of clinically significant prognostic risk factors and formulation of new rational therapeutic regimens have great significance for enhancing the survival rate and improving the outcome in patients with advanced or metastatic disease. The identification of genetic alterations, including somatic mutations and microsatellite instability, and the definition of intracellular signaling pathways alterations that have a major role in in tumorigenesis is leading to the development of new therapeutic options for immunotherapy and targeted therapy.

Endometrial Cancer: Obesity, Genetics, and Targeted Agents

It is imperative to understand the underlying mechanisms of both endometrial carcinogenesis and recurrence in order to develop more effective prevention and treatment. This article reviews available molecular data, the interplay between endometrial cancer carcinogenesis with obesity and genetics, as well as current targeted therapies.

Crosstalk between SOX2 and cytokine signaling in endometrial carcinoma

Endometrial carcinoma is a cancer derived from oncogenesis of the regenerating uterine cavity, in which cytokine stimulation shapes cell differentiation and tissue remodeling. Expression of the stem cell factors SOX2, OCT4, NANOG, and MYC has been linked to tumor malignancy in several cancers. However, how these stem cell factors crosstalk with cytokine signaling to promote malignancy in endometrial carcinoma is still elusive. Here we report that the expression of SOX2 and MYC, but not that of OCT4 and NANOG, correlate with poor histological differentiation and prognosis, while SOX2 expression is negatively associated with MYC level. We found that SOX2-high endometrial carcinoma cells possessed a higher colony-forming ability than their SOX2-low counterparts, and knockdown of SOX2 attenuated the colony-forming ability. We observed that SOX2 regulated EGFR expression in a SOX2–EGFR positive feedback loop. EGF stimulation induced SOX2 expression and promoted migration of endometrial carcinoma cells, whereas TGF-β stimulation inhibited SOX2 expression and attenuated the colony-forming ability. Immunohistochemistry analysis revealed that SOX2 expression correlated with lymph node infiltration of endometrial carcinoma. Our findings support that cytokine-induced stem cell factor SOX2 possesses oncogenic properties, with the potential to serve as a prognostic biomarker in endometrial carcinoma.

Management Strategies for Recurrent Endometrial Cancer

INTRODUCTION

Endometrial cancer is the most common gynecologic malignancy in the developed world, and its incidence is increasing. Mortality from this cancer has not improved in recent decades and is primarily driven by high-grade carcinomas that are more likely to present at an advanced stage and ultimately are more likely to recur. The prognosis for recurrent endometrial cancer is poor, especially for the 50% of these women that present with extrapelvic disease recurrence. As a standard of care, recurrent disease has been treated with platinum-based chemotherapy; however, new therapies are emerging as we identify drivers of proliferation and metastasis at the cellular and molecular levels. Areas Covered: We review currently available data for the management of recurrent endometrial cancer, with a focus on systemic treatment of recurrent disease. We discuss the available evidence for first-line, second-line, and subsequent systemic therapy and discuss emerging therapeutic targets including their biologic plausibility and early clinical data. Expert Commentary: Endometrial cancer, though prevalent, remains underfunded and understudied. Recurrent and metastatic disease remains difficult to treat, and prospective randomized data are limited. Our ability to reduce mortality due to this cancer is dependent on identifying new and effective therapeutic strategies for recurrent disease.

Endometrial cancer: Molecular markers and management of advanced stage disease

Endometrial cancer is the most prevalent gynecologic cancer in the United States. Over the last 10 years, death rates from endometrial cancer have been rising about 1.4% per year. Traditionally endometrial cancer treatment has been driven by stage and histology. Recent studies have, however, shown that cancers of the same stage and histology have very distinct molecular and genomic profiles. Translational research is progressing rapidly and endometrial cancer-specific precision medicine is evolving. The first tissue agnostic therapy based on the molecular profile of the tumor was approved by the FDA this year. The approval of immune checkpoint inhibitor, pembrolizumab (anti-PD-1), for all solid tumors with defective DNA mismatch repair, could benefit 20-30% of patients with advanced endometrial cancer. Other genomic changes and molecular markers in endometrial cancer, such as hormone receptor status, could lead to more tailored therapy in the future. Pre-clinical and clinical investigations of targeted therapies suggest efficacy for some agents. Single agent targeted therapies, however, have modest activity. Identifying biomarkers that effectively determine response to targeted therapy remains a challenge. The next generation of clinical trials will focus on novel combinations and how to best utilize the advances that have been made in sequencing technology and bioinformatics. Although there is currently an immense body of data and many options for obtaining genomic characteristics of endometrial cancer, how to interpret and utilize this data is still being explored. This review will summarize the important trials that have led to the treatment options we have for advanced and/or recurrent endometrial cancer and discuss the important studies that have led to a better understanding of the distinctive molecular and genomic profiles within endometrial cancer. We will review the current status of biomarker-driven targeted therapy in endometrial cancer and the rationale behind ongoing clinical trials that are utilizing novel targeted agents.

Significance of calreticulin as a prognostic factor in endometrial cancer

In patients with endometrial cancer, the expression and prognostic significance of calreticulin (CRT) remains to be fully elucidated. To investigate the role of CRT in endometrial cancer, the present study compared its expression status with clinicopathological characteristics and evaluated its prognostic significance. The expression of CRT, PKR-like endoplasmic reticulum kinase (PERK), phosphorylated eukaryotic initiation factor 2α (p-eIF2α), and Ki67 were assessed by immunohistochemistry and/or western blotting in endometrial cancer patients. The association of the expression of CRT, p-eIF2α and Ki67 with patient survival rate was assessed by Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses. Low levels of CRT and an overexpression of Ki67 were significantly associated with the stage, histology, and differentiation of the primary surgery without doxorubicin (DOX) neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) patient group and were significantly correlated with a short progression-free survival and the overall survival. A multivariate analysis revealed that CRT and Ki67 expression were independent prognostic indicators for endometrioid endometrial cancer. Low CRT expression and an overexpression of Ki67 were significantly associated with DOX-NAC and the histology (P<0.05) pre-NAC and post-NAC in the DOX-NAC patient group. Upon treatment of DOX-NAC, CRT, PERK and p-eIF2α protein content were overexpressed in DOX-sensitive endometrial cancer (P<0.05), whereas there was no significant difference in the DOX-resistant group. Low CRT expression in endometrial cancer is significantly associated with aggressive progression and poor prognosis. CRT may therefore serve as a molecular marker for predicting the progression and prognosis in DOX-resistant endometrial cancer patients.

Clinical trials in gynecologic oncology: Past, present, and future

The Gynecologic Oncology Group has historically performed ground-breaking, practice-changing clinical trials in women's cancers. The current standard of care for initial treatment of ovarian, endometrial, cervical, and trophoblastic cancers was determined by clinical trials completed within this cooperative group structure. For example, trial GOG-0111 set the standard for combining platinum and taxane chemotherapy in ovarian cancer, and more recently GOG-0240 provided evidence for adding bevacizumab to chemotherapy for women with advanced cervical cancer. The landscape of clinical trial design has markedly changed in recent decades, with a clear emphasis on streamlining drug development towards specific patient populations and indications for investigational agents. Translational science in gynecologic cancers can set the stage for rapid and efficient introduction of new therapies for our patients. The gynecologic oncology community of researchers and clinicians is well positioned to enter into the new era of drug development, with breakthrough discoveries increasing each year. It is clear that we must incorporate smarter clinical trial design to get the right drugs to the right patients expeditiously, so we can continue to improve outcome for women with gynecologic cancers.

New therapies for advanced, recurrent, and metastatic endometrial cancers

Endometrial cancer is the most common gynecologic malignancy in the United States, accounting for 6% of cancers in women. In 2017, an estimated 61,380 women were diagnosed with endometrial cancer, and approximately 11,000 died from this disease. From 1987 to 2008, there was a 50% increase in the incidence of endometrial cancer, with an approximate 300% increase in the number of associated deaths. Although there are many chemotherapeutic and targeted therapy agents approved for ovarian, fallopian tube and primary peritoneal cancers, since the 1971 approval of megestrol acetate for the palliative treatment of advanced endometrial cancer, only pembrolizumab has been Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved for high microsatellite instability (MSI-H) or mismatch repair deficient (dMMR) endometrial cancer; this highlights the need for new therapies to treat advanced, recurrent, metastatic endometrial cancer. In this review, we discuss current and emerging treatment options for endometrial cancer, including chemotherapy, targeted therapy, and immunotherapy. The National Cancer Institute (NCI) and others are now focusing their efforts on the design of scientifically rational targeted therapy and immunotherapy trials for specific molecular phenotypes of endometrial cancer. This is essential for the advancement of cancer care for women, which is threatened by a severe enrollment decline of approximately 80% for gynecologic oncology clinical trials.

Endometrial Carcinoma: Specific Targeted Pathways

Endometrial cancer (EC) is the most common gynecologic malignancy in the western world with more than 280,000 cases per year worldwide. Prognosis for EC at early stages, when primary surgical resection is the most common initial treatment, is excellent. Five-year survival rate is around 70 %.Several molecular alterations have been described in the different types of EC. They occur in genes involved in important signaling pathways. In this chapter, we will review the most relevant altered pathways in EC, including PI3K/AKT/mTOR, RAS-RAF-MEK-ERK, Tyrosine kinase, WNT/β-Catenin, cell cycle, and TGF-β signaling pathways. At the end of the chapter, the most significant clinical trials will be briefly discussed.This information is important to identify specific targets for therapy.

Recent Advances in Endometrial Cancer

Endometrial cancer is the most common gynecologic malignancy in the United States, with yearly rates continuing to increase. Most women present with early stage disease; however, advanced disease carries a grave prognosis. As a result, novel therapies are currently under investigation for the treatment of endometrial cancer. These advances include a better understanding of the genetic basis surrounding the development of endometrial cancer, novel surgical therapies, and new molecular targets for the treatment of this disease. This review explores the literature regarding these advancements in endometrial cancer.

New Targeted Agents in Endometrial Cancer: Are We Really Making Progress?

Endometrial cancer is the most common gynecological malignancy in Europe and North America. Metastatic and recurrent disease is generally incurable with poor prognosis. Recent advances in molecular profiling of endometrial cancer have elucidated four distinct molecular subtypes with different biology and prognosis which should facilitate the development of treatments tailored to disease-specific subgroups. To date, some molecular-targeted agents have shown interesting clinical activity in the recurrent setting, but no targeted therapies are approved for endometrial cancer. Novel pan-PI3K, AKT, and dual PI3K-mTOR inhibitors are being investigated with early signs of activity, but there are concerns about tolerability and toxicity in this often elderly patient population with comorbidities. The development of anti-angiogenic therapies, PARP inhibitors, and immunotherapies, alone or in combinations, appear to be promising strategies. This paper will describe the current evidence supporting the efficacy of molecular-targeted agents already tested in the treatment of metastatic and recurrent EC, and provide some insights on emerging data related to novel-targeted therapies.

Chemotherapy for Endometrial Cancer in Adjuvant and Advanced Disease Settings

: Level I evidence exists for use of adjuvant chemotherapy in stage IIIC endometrial cancer (positive lymph nodes), although results of randomized trials have varied. Chemotherapy is also often recommended for high-risk subsets of stage I disease, such as serous carcinomas, although prospective trial data to validate this practice are lacking. Carboplatin plus paclitaxel is the current standard regimen, based on extrapolation of data from the metastatic setting. Several clinical trials have compared adjuvant pelvic radiotherapy alone to a combination of radiotherapy and chemotherapy with mixed results. One of the largest of these trials, Postoperative Radiation Therapy in Endometrial Carcinoma 3 (PORTEC-3), has completed accrual and is awaiting data maturation. Metastatic disease is not curable. For tumors of low-grade endometrioid histology with a prolonged time to recurrence, endocrine therapy with a progestin-based regimen is appropriate. Chemotherapy will be used in most other cases, and the standard first-line regimen is carboplatin and paclitaxel. Few chemotherapy agents have been shown to produce meaningful response rates in the second-line setting. Molecularly targeted therapies such as mTOR inhibitors and antiangiogenic agents including bevacizumab have been studied but their role in the armamentarium remains uncertain.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Following surgical resection and staging for endometrial cancer, adjuvant chemotherapy with carboplatin and paclitaxel can be administered to patients with a high risk for recurrence. This includes patients with stage IIIC disease with positive lymph nodes, and high-risk subsets of stage I disease such as serous carcinomas. In the metastatic setting, endocrine therapy can be considered, particularly for patients with lower-grade disease and a prolonged time to recurrence. Combined therapy with carboplatin and paclitaxel is the standard of care used for front-line chemotherapy. Antiangiogenic agents are clearly active, but how they should be integrated into treatment is not yet determined. Immunotherapy is a promising direction for patients with mismatch repair-deficient or polymerase ε-mutated tumors.

Endometrial Carcinoma: Role of Current and Emerging Biomarkers in Resolving Persistent Clinical Dilemmas

OBJECTIVES

Type II and other high-grade endometrial carcinomas may challenge conventional treatment due to recurrence and metastatic spread and therefore are a persistent clinical dilemma. Effective targeted therapy for these is a goal for clinicians and researchers alike.

METHODS

An extensive review of the literature has been performed for obtaining an in-depth understanding of the clinicopathological characteristics, etiologic factors, and molecular profile of these subsets of endometrial carcinoma. Progress made with current and emerging biomarkers for prognosis assessment and therapeutic targeting has been summarized.

RESULTS

There has been a significant increase in research on potential biomarkers of endometrial cancer, and beneficial targeted therapies have been identified.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinical trials are leading the charge for substantial gains toward personalized treatment of aggressive endometrial carcinoma subtypes.

A phase II evaluation of cediranib in the treatment of recurrent or persistent endometrial cancer: An NRG Oncology/Gynecologic Oncology Group study

PURPOSE

Cediranib is a multi-tyrosine kinase inhibitor targeting vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF), and fibroblast growth factor (FGF) receptors. This phase II study was conducted to assess activity and tolerability of single-agent cediranib in recurrent/persistent endometrial cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Eligible patients had recurrent or persistent endometrial cancer after receiving one or two prior cytotoxic regimens, measurable disease, and Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG) performance status of ≤2 (≤1 if two prior cytotoxic regimens given). Cediranib 30mg orally daily for a 28daycycle was administered until disease progression or prohibitive toxicity. Microvessel density (MVD) was measured in tumor tissue from initial hysterectomy specimens and correlated with clinical outcome. Primary endpoints were tumor response and surviving progression-free for six months without subsequent therapy (6-month event-free survival [EFS]).

RESULTS

Of 53 patients enrolled, 48 were evaluable for cediranib efficacy and toxicity. Median age was 65.5 years, 52% of patients had received prior radiation, and 73% of patients received only one prior chemotherapy regimen. A partial response was observed in 12.5%. Fourteen patients (29%) had six-month EFS. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 3.65 months and median overall survival (OS) 12.5 months. No grade 4 or 5 toxicities were observed. A trend towards improved PFS was found in patients whose tumors expressed high MVD.

CONCLUSION

Cediranib as a monotherapy treatment for recurrent or persistent endometrial cancer is well tolerated and met protocol set objectives for sufficient activity to warrant further investigation. MVD may be a useful biomarker for activity.

A phase II trial of trebananib (AMG 386; IND#111071), a selective angiopoietin 1/2 neutralizing peptibody, in patients with persistent/recurrent carcinoma of the endometrium: An NRG/Gynecologic Oncology Group trial

OBJECTIVES

Ang1 & 2 (angiopoietin-1; -2) interact with Tie2 receptors on endothelial cells to mediate vascular remodeling in an angiogenesis signaling pathway distinct from the VEGF axis. Trebananib is a peptide Fc fusion protein that binds Ang1 and 2 and prevents interaction with Tie2. The efficacy of trebananib in recurrent/persistent endometrial cancer (EC) was studied.

METHODS

The primary objective was to determine the frequency of patients with objective tumor responses (ORR) and event-free survival for ≥6months (6-month EFS) and determine toxicity of trebananib at a dose and schedule of 15mg/kg, IV QW. Recurrent/persistent EC, measurable disease, and ≤2 prior chemotherapy lines were required.

RESULTS

Thirty-two patients were eligible and treated. The most common histologies were G1/2 endometrioid (31%), G3 endometrioid (28%) and serous (31.3%). 78% of patients had 1 prior regimen. Patients received 1-9+ cycles of trebananib; 24 patients (75%) received ≤2cycles. One patient had a partial response (3.1%); 8 patients had stable disease (25%) and 5 patients (15.6%) had 6 month EFS. Median progression-free survival and overall-survival were 1.97 months (90% CI 1.77-2.1) and 6.6 months (90% CI 4.01-14.75), respectively. Most common adverse events (AEs) were fatigue, anemia, and GI issues. Grade 3 and 4 AEs were: GI 31 and 0%; vascular 22 and 0%; metabolism/nutrition 19 and 3%; and general (including edema) 16 and 0%.

CONCLUSIONS

Trebananib has insufficient single agent activity in recurrent EC to warrant further investigation at this dose/schedule.

Phase II evaluation of dalantercept, a soluble recombinant activin receptor-like kinase 1 (ALK1) receptor fusion protein, for the treatment of recurrent or persistent endometrial cancer: an NRG Oncology/Gynecologic Oncology Group Study 0229N

OBJECTIVE

This two-stage phase II study assessed activity of single agent dalantercept in patients with recurrent/persistent endometrial carcinoma (EMC).

METHODS

Eligible patients had persistent/recurrent EMC after 1-2 prior cytotoxic regimens, measurable disease (RECIST 1.1), and GOG performance≤2. Dalantercept 1.2mg/kg subcutaneous was administered once every 3weeks until disease progression (PD)/development of prohibitory toxicity. Primary objectives were to estimate the proportion of patients with persistent/recurrent EMC, who survive progression-free without receiving non-protocol therapy (TPFS) for at least 6months and to estimate the proportion having objective tumor response.

RESULTS

All 28 enrolled patients were eligible and evaluable. Median age: 62years. Most common histologies: 32% Grade 1/2 endometrioid and 54% serous tumors. Prior treatment: 1 or 2 regimens in 82% and 18% of patients, respectively. Eighteen patients received prior radiation therapy. Patients received 1-12 cycles of dalantercept, and 46% of patients received ≤2cycles. The most common adverse events (AE) were fatigue, anemia, constipation and peripheral edema. Grade 3/4 AEs occurred in 39% and 4% of patients. One grade 5 gastric hemorrhage in a patient with a history of radiation fibrosis/small bowel obstruction was deemed possibly dalantercept-related. All patients are off study: 86% for PD. No ORs were observed; 57% had stable disease and 11% had TPFS>6 mos. Median progression-free and overall survival: 2.1months (90% CI: 1.4-3.2) and 14.5months (90% CI: 7.0-17.5), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Dalantercept has insufficient single agent activity in recurrent EMC to warrant further investigation at this dose level and schedule.

Comprehensive profiling of EGFR/HER receptors for personalized treatment of gynecologic cancers

The primary gynecologic cancers include cancers of the endometrium, ovary, and cervix. Worldwide, cervical cancer is the most common gynecologic cancer, whereas endometrial cancer is the most common in the US. Ovarian cancer is the fifth most deadly cancer in women, with 5-year survival rates for advanced disease at only 27 %. As such, there is an urgent need for reliable screening tools and novel targeted therapeutic regimens for these malignancies. The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)/human EGFR (HER) family of receptors has been associated with the development and progression of many solid tumors. Despite clear roles for these receptors in other cancers, the expression of HER family members in gynecologic cancers and their relationship with disease stage, grade, and response to treatment remain controversial. In this review, we describe the existing evidence for the use of HER family members as diagnostic and prognostic indicators as well as their potential as therapeutic targets in gynecologic cancers.

Emerging drugs for endometrial cancer

INTRODUCTION

From the dualistic classification that divides endometrial cancer (EC) into two types with distinct underlying molecular profiling, histopathology and clinical behavior, arises a deeper understanding of the carcinogenesis pathways. EC treatment comprises different and multimodal therapeutic approaches, such as chemotherapy, radiation therapy or combinations of novel drugs; however, few of these regimens have truly improved progression-free or survival rates in advanced and metastatic settings.

AREAS COVERED

We reviewed the main molecular pathways involved in EC carcinogenesis through a wide literature search of novel compounds that alone or in combination with traditional drugs have been investigated or are currently under investigation in randomized clinical trials.

EXPERT OPINION

The molecular therapies mainly discussed in this review are potential therapeutic candidates for more effective and specific treatments. In the genomic era, a deeper knowledge about molecular characteristics of cancer provides the hope for the development of better therapeutic approaches. Targeting both genetic and epigenetic alterations, attacking tumor cells using cell-surface markers overexpressed in tumor tissue, reactivating antitumor immune responses and identifying predictive biomarkers represent the emerging strategies and the major challenges.

A phase II trial of brivanib in recurrent or persistent endometrial cancer: an NRG Oncology/Gynecologic Oncology Group Study

PURPOSE

Brivanib, an oral, multi-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor with activity against vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) was investigated as a single agent in a phase II trial to assess the activity and tolerability in recurrent or persistent endometrial cancer (EMC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Eligible patients had persistent or recurrent EMC after receiving one to two prior cytotoxic regimens, measurable disease, and performance status of ≤2. Treatment consisted of brivanib 800 mg orally every day until disease progression or prohibitive toxicity. Primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) at six months and objective tumor response. Expression of multiple angiogenic proteins and FGFR2 mutation status was assessed.

RESULTS

Forty-five patients were enrolled. Forty-three patients were eligible and evaluable. Median age was 64 years. Twenty-four patients (55.8%) received prior radiation. Median number of cycles was two (range 1-24). No GI perforations but one rectal fistula were seen. Nine patients had grade 3 hypertension, with one experiencing grade 4 confusion. Eight patients (18.6%; 90% CI 9.6%-31.7%) had responses (one CR and seven PRs), and 13 patients (30.2%; 90% CI 18.9%-43.9%) were PFS at six months. Median PFS and overall survival (OS) were 3.3 and 10.7 months, respectively. When modeled jointly, VEGF and angiopoietin-2 expression may diametrically predict PFS. Estrogen receptor-α (ER) expression was positively correlated with OS.

CONCLUSION

Brivanib is reasonably well tolerated and worthy of further investigation based on PFS at six months in recurrent or persistent EMC.

Past, present, and future of hormonal therapy in recurrent endometrial cancer

Endometrial cancer is a heterogeneous disease. Type I cancers are hormonally driven, typically present with a low grade at an early stage, and are of endometrioid histology. These cancers are often cured by surgery, and the rate of recurrence is low. Type II cancers are less differentiated, often appear at a later stage, and are of serous, clear cell, or high grade endometrioid histology. The risk of recurrence in these cancers is much higher than with type I tumors. Isolated pelvic recurrences can be treated with radiation or exenteration, but systemic disease is fatal. It is in these recurrent patients, where prolongation of progression-free survival is the goal, that hormonal therapy can have the greatest benefit. In selected patients, hormonal therapy can be as effective as cytotoxic chemotherapy, without the toxicity and at a much lower cost. Here we review the evidence for treatment of patients suffering from recurrent endometrial cancer with hormonal therapy and explore avenues for the future of hormonal treatment of endometrial cancer. Currently, progesterone is the hormonal treatment of choice in these patients. Other drugs are also used, including selective estrogen receptor modulators, aromatase inhibitors, and gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonists. Hormonal treatment of recurrent endometrial cancer relies on expression of the hormone receptors, which act as nuclear transcription factors. Tumors that express these receptors are the most sensitive to therapy; it is for this reason that patient selection is vitally important to the successful treatment of recurrent endometrial cancer with hormonal therapy.

Update on Prognostic Markers for Endometrial Cancer

Endometrial cancer is the most common gynecologic cancer in the USA and the second most common worldwide after cervical cancer. While common symptomatology of endometrial cancer leads to early diagnosis and favorable 5-year survival in most cases, there is a subset of cancers that have a poorer prognosis. The clinical and pathologic prognostic factors for endometrial cancer are well known and instrumental in determining the need for adjuvant therapy. Recently, research has been focused on the identification of molecular changes leading to different histologic subtypes to improve classification of endometrial cancer. The identification of novel mutations and molecular profiles should enhance our ability to personalize adjuvant treatment with genome-guided targeted therapy.

The estrogen receptor joins other cancer biomarkers as a predictor of outcome

Endometrial cancer, the most common gynecologic malignancy in the United States, is on the rise, and survival is worse today than 40 years ago. In order to improve the outcomes, better biomarkers that direct the choice of therapy are urgently needed. In this review, we explore the estrogen receptor as the most studied biomarker and the best predictor for response for endometrial cancer reported to date.