1
|
van den Oever SR, de Beijer IAE, Kremer LCM, Alfes M, Balaguer J, Bardi E, Nieto AC, Cangioli G, Charalambous E, Chronaki C, Costa T, Degelsegger A, Düster V, Filbert AL, Grabow D, Gredinger G, Gsell H, Haupt R, van Helvoirt M, Ladenstein R, Langer T, Laschkolnig A, Muraca M, Rascon J, Schreier G, Tomasikova Z, Tormo MT, Trinkunas J, Trollip J, Trunner K, Uyttebroeck A, van der Pal HJH, Pluijm SMF. Barriers and facilitators to implementation of the interoperable Survivorship Passport (SurPass) v2.0 in 6 European countries: a PanCareSurPass online survey study. J Cancer Surviv 2024; 18:928-940. [PMID: 36808389 DOI: 10.1007/s11764-023-01335-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2022] [Accepted: 01/09/2023] [Indexed: 02/23/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Long-term follow-up (LTFU) care for childhood cancer survivors (CCSs) is essential to improve and maintain their quality of life. The Survivorship Passport (SurPass) is a digital tool which can aid in the delivery of adequate LTFU care. During the European PanCareSurPass (PCSP) project, the SurPass v2.0 will be implemented and evaluated at six LTFU care clinics in Austria, Belgium, Germany, Italy, Lithuania and Spain. We aimed to identify barriers and facilitators to the implementation of the SurPass v2.0 with regard to the care process as well as ethical, legal, social and economical aspects. METHODS An online, semi-structured survey was distributed to 75 stakeholders (LTFU care providers, LTFU care program managers and CCSs) affiliated with one of the six centres. Barriers and facilitators identified in four centres or more were defined as main contextual factors influencing implementation of SurPass v2.0. RESULTS Fifty-four barriers and 50 facilitators were identified. Among the main barriers were a lack of time and (financial) resources, gaps in knowledge concerning ethical and legal issues and a potential increase in health-related anxiety in CCSs upon receiving a SurPass. Main facilitators included institutions' access to electronic medical records, as well as previous experience with SurPass or similar tools. CONCLUSIONS We provided an overview of contextual factors that may influence SurPass implementation. Solutions should be found to overcome barriers and ensure effective implementation of SurPass v2.0 into routine clinical care. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS These findings will be used to inform on an implementation strategy tailored for the six centres.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Selina R van den Oever
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Heidelberglaan 25, 3584 CS, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | - Ismay A E de Beijer
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Heidelberglaan 25, 3584 CS, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Leontien C M Kremer
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Heidelberglaan 25, 3584 CS, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- University Medical Center Utrecht, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Julia Balaguer
- Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe, Valencia, Spain
| | - Edit Bardi
- St. Anna Children's Hospital, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Johannes Kepler University Linz, Kepler University Hospital, Linz, Austria
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Vanessa Düster
- St. Anna Children's Cancer Research Institute, Vienna, Austria
| | - Anna-Liesa Filbert
- University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Desiree Grabow
- University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | - Ruth Ladenstein
- St. Anna Children's Hospital, Vienna, Austria
- St. Anna Children's Cancer Research Institute, Vienna, Austria
| | - Thorsten Langer
- Universitatsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lubeck, Lubeck, Germany
| | | | | | - Jelena Rascon
- Vilnius University Hospital Santaros Klinikos, Vilnius, Lithuania
| | | | | | | | - Justas Trinkunas
- Vilnius University Hospital Santaros Klinikos, Vilnius, Lithuania
| | - Jessica Trollip
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Heidelberglaan 25, 3584 CS, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Anne Uyttebroeck
- Universitatsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lubeck, Lubeck, Germany
| | - Helena J H van der Pal
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Heidelberglaan 25, 3584 CS, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Saskia M F Pluijm
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Heidelberglaan 25, 3584 CS, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Marcu I, Melnyk M, Nekkanti S, Nagel C. Pelvic floor dysfunction survivorship needs and referrals in the gynecologic oncology population: a narrative review. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2023:ijgc-2023-004810. [PMID: 37935522 DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2023-004810] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2023] Open
Abstract
The population of survivors of gynecologic malignancies continues to grow. The population of gynecologic oncology survivors has a high prevalence of pelvic floor disorders. Gynecologic oncology patients identify several survivorship needs, including a need for more focused pelvic floor disorder sequelae care. The increasing focus on patient needs following cancer treatment has led to the development of survivorship care plans and other strategies for addressing post-treatment transitions and sequelae. Common themes in patient survivorship care are patient needs for flexible and integrated care, and it is unclear if survivorship care plans in their current state improve patient outcomes. Patient referrals, specifically to urogynecologists, may help address the gaps in survivorship care of pelvic floor dysfunction.The objective of this review is to discuss the burden of pelvic floor disorders in the gynecologic population and to contextualize these needs within broader survivorship needs. The review will then discuss current strategies of survivorship care, including a discussion of whether these methods meet survivorship pelvic floor disorder needs. This review addresses several gaps in the literature by contextualizing pelvic floor disorder needs within other survivorship needs and providing a critical discussion of current survivorship care strategies with a focus on pelvic floor disorders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ioana Marcu
- Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Megan Melnyk
- School of Medicine, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Silpa Nekkanti
- Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Christa Nagel
- Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Chu AK, Mutsaers B, Lebel S. The Association between Survivorship Care Plans and Patient-Reported Satisfaction and Confidence with Follow-Up Cancer Care Provided by Primary Care Providers. Curr Oncol 2022; 29:7343-7354. [PMID: 36290854 PMCID: PMC9600139 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol29100577] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2022] [Revised: 09/23/2022] [Accepted: 09/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Survivorship care plans aim to facilitate a smooth transition from tertiary to primary care settings after primary cancer treatment is completed. This study sought to identify the sociodemographic factors associated with receiving a survivorship care plan and examine the relationship between receiving a plan and confidence in follow-up care delivered by primary care providers. A cross-sectional analysis of the Canadian Partnership Against Cancer's Experiences of Cancer Patients in Transition Study was conducted (n = 9970). Separate adjusted multinomial logistic regression models assessed the relationship between survivorship care plans and follow-up care outcomes. Proportion of survivors more likely to receive a survivorship care plan varied by numerous sociodemographic and medical factors, such as cancer type (colorectal and prostate), gender (male), and education (high school or less). In unadjusted and adjusted models, individuals who received a Survivorship Care Plan had significantly higher odds of: having felt their primary care providers were involved; agreeing that their primary care providers understood their needs, knew where to find supports and services, and were able to refer them directly to services; and were confident that their primary care provider could meet their follow-up care needs.
Collapse
|
4
|
Peerenboom R, Ackroyd SA, Chang C, Diaz Moore E, Jenkins Vogel T, Lippitt MH, Rodriguez G, Kirschner Concept development CV. Surviving and thriving: what do survivors of gynecologic cancer want? Gynecol Oncol Rep 2022; 41:101011. [PMID: 35663850 PMCID: PMC9160655 DOI: 10.1016/j.gore.2022.101011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2022] [Revised: 05/16/2022] [Accepted: 05/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Gynecologic cancer survivors’ top concern was fear of cancer recurrence. Nutrition and weight loss were the most desired survivorship program components. Survivorship concerns/preferences varied by clinical and demographic factors.
The purpose of this study was to characterize survivorship concerns and survivorship program preferences among gynecologic cancer survivors. Women treated for gynecologic malignancy at our cancer center were surveyed from 1/2019 to 10/2020 on concerns and preferences using a 5-point Likert scale. Descriptive analysis and multivariable logistic regression were performed to describe survivors’ concerns/preferences. The most frequent survivorship concerns were fear of cancer recurrence (49.6%), desire to lose weight (40.0%), and long-term side effects (30.7%). The highest ranked survivorship program components included assistance with nutrition (36.5%), weight loss (30.4%), and stress reduction (29.0%). Older patients (≥64 y) were less likely to report concern with losing weight (OR 0.26, p < 0.05), sex life (OR 0.18, p < 0.01), and strain in family relationships (OR 0.27, p < 0.05) compared with younger patients. Compared with ovarian/fallopian tube/primary peritoneal cancer survivors, endometrial cancer survivors were less likely to desire nutritional education (OR 0.06, p < 0.01). Participants with advanced cancer were less likely to desire assistance with weight loss than those with early stage cancer (OR 0.23, p < 0.05). A significant portion of gynecologic cancer survivors reported a fear of cancer recurrence. Assistance with nutrition and weight loss were the most desired survivorship program components. Variation in patient preferences and differences among clinical subgroups highlight the need for tailored survivorship care.
Collapse
|
5
|
O’Hea EL, Creamer S, Flahive JM, Keating BA, Crocker CR, Williamson SR, Edmiston KL, Harralson T, Boudreaux ED. Survivorship care planning, quality of life, and confidence to transition to survivorship: A randomized controlled trial with women ending treatment for breast cancer. J Psychosoc Oncol 2022; 40:574-594. [PMID: 34151734 PMCID: PMC9157313 DOI: 10.1080/07347332.2021.1936336] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The Polaris Oncology Survivorship Transition (POST) system is a computer-based program that integrates information from the electronic health record, oncology team, and the patient to produce a personalized Survivorship Care Plan. The purpose of this study was to compare the POST to treatment as usual on confidence, quality of life, and interest in mental health referrals in women ending treatment for breast cancer. SAMPLE Two hundred women (100 POST, 100 treatment as usual) ending treatment for breast cancer were enrolled in a randomized controlled trial. DESIGN Women randomized to the POST condition received a personalized care plan during a baseline/intervention appointment. At enrollment and baseline/intervention, a number of outcomes were examined in this study, including confidence to enter survivorship measured by the Confidence in Survivorship Index (CSI) and Quality of Life (QOL). One, three, and six month follow up assessments were also conducted. FINDINGS Treatment groups did not differ in terms of QOL scores at any time points. Mean CSI scores were statistically different between POST and treatment as usual at baseline for the total CSI score and both subscales, but only for confidence in knowledge about prevention and treatment at the 1-month follow-up. All significant differences were in favor of the POST intervention as mean CSI scores were higher for participants who received the POST intervention as opposed to treatment as usual. These findings disappeared at the 3 and 6 month follow up assessments. Finally, patients who received the POST intervention were twice as likely to request mental health/social services referrals compared to women who received treatment as usual. IMPLICATIONS Oncologists may use the POST to build personalized care plans for women ending treatment for cancer, which may enhance patients' confidence in the short term as well as encourage use of mental health resources.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erin L. O’Hea
- Stonehill College and University of Massachusetts Medical School, 320 Washington Street, Easton, MA, USA 02357
| | - Samantha Creamer
- University of Massachusetts Medical School, Department of Psychiatry
| | - Julie M. Flahive
- University of Massachusetts Medical School, Department of Population and Quantitative Health Science
| | - Beth A. Keating
- University of Massachusetts Medical School, Department of Hematology/Oncology
| | | | | | | | | | - Edwin D. Boudreaux
- Departments of Emergency Medicine, Psychiatry, and Quantitative Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Medical School
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Oncology Nurses' Perspectives and Practices Toward the Delivery of Cancer Survivorship Care in Hong Kong. Cancer Nurs 2021; 44:295-304. [PMID: 32132367 DOI: 10.1097/ncc.0000000000000791] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite tremendous progress in understanding the unmet needs of cancer survivors, our understanding of oncology nurses' perspectives and practices in the delivery of survivorship care is inadequate. OBJECTIVES The aims of this study were to assess oncology nurses' perceptions about their responsibility and frequency of delivery of survivorship care to cancer patients and to examine the factors influencing such care. METHODS A cross-sectional survey was administered to 81 nurses working in the oncology unit of hospitals in Hong Kong. Participants completed an investigator-developed questionnaire designed to assess oncology nurses' perceptions of responsibility, practices, and barriers regarding the provision of survivorship care for cancer patients. RESULTS Results revealed discrepancies between oncology nurses' perceptions of responsibility and practices, with high levels of perceptions of various survivorship care as their responsibility but low levels in delivery of such care. Despite that discussing and managing pain was agreed by most oncology nurses as their responsibility (95.1%), 34.6% of them have never managed survivors' pain. Besides, 33.3% of nurses have never discussed and managed survivors' sexuality issues. Lack of time (79.0%), inadequate educational resources for family members (59.3%), and lack of knowledge and skills (54.4%) were major factors that impeded survivorship care provision. CONCLUSIONS This study provides further evidence for inadequacies of oncology nurses in delivering survivorship care and their perceived barriers. Further studies are required to enhance our understanding of the strategies for improving the quality of cancer survivorship care. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE Results underscore the need to develop educational resources and enhance training in survivorship care for oncology nurses.
Collapse
|
7
|
Collins A, Taylor A, Guttery DS, Moss EL. Innovative Follow-up Strategies for Endometrial Cancer. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2021; 33:e383-e392. [PMID: 34172343 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2021.06.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2021] [Revised: 04/26/2021] [Accepted: 06/01/2021] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
Increasing recognition of the heterogeneous nature of endometrial cancer, the excellent prognosis of low-risk cases and improvements in risk stratification offer opportunities for innovative, personalised follow-up strategies. This review article outlines the evidence base for alternative follow-up strategies in the different risk categories of endometrial cancer, cancer survivorship programmes and considers future directions in endometrial cancer follow-up, including emerging new techniques, such as the liquid biopsy, and opportunities for combining molecular and clinicopathological features to personalise endometrial cancer follow-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Collins
- Leicester Cancer Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| | - A Taylor
- Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - D S Guttery
- Leicester Cancer Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| | - E L Moss
- Leicester Cancer Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Salz T, Ostroff JS, Nightingale CL, Atkinson TM, Davidson EC, Jinna SR, Kriplani A, Lesser GJ, Lynch KA, Mayer DK, Oeffinger KC, Patil S, Salner AL, Weaver KE. The Head and Neck Survivorship Tool (HN-STAR) Trial (WF-1805CD): A protocol for a cluster-randomized, hybrid effectiveness-implementation, pragmatic trial to improve the follow-up care of head and neck cancer survivors. Contemp Clin Trials 2021; 107:106448. [PMID: 34023515 DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2021.106448] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2021] [Revised: 04/26/2021] [Accepted: 05/17/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Survivors of head and neck cancer (HNC) can have multiple health concerns. To facilitate their care, we developed and pilot-tested a clinical informatics intervention, HN-STAR. HN-STAR elicits concerns online from HNC survivors prior to a routine oncology clinic visit. HN-STAR then presents tailored evidence-based clinical recommendations as a clinical decision support tool to be used during the visit where the oncology clinician and survivor select symptom management strategies and other actions. This generates a survivorship care plan (SCP). Online elicitation of health concerns occurs 3, 6, and 9 months after the clinic visit, generating an updated SCP each time. HN-STAR encompasses important methods of improving survivorship care (e.g., needs assessment, tailored interventions, dissemination of guidelines) and will be evaluated in a pragmatic trial to maximize external validity. This hybrid type 1 implementation-effectiveness trial tests HN-STAR effectiveness while studying barriers and facilitators to implementation in community oncology practices within the National Cancer Institute Community Oncology Research Program. Effectiveness will be measured as differences in key survivorship outcomes between HNC participants who do and do not use HN-STAR over one year after the clinic visit. The primary endpoint is HNC-specific quality of life; other outcomes include patient-centered measures and receipt of guideline-concordant care. Implementation outcomes will be assessed of survivors, providers, and clinic stakeholders. The hybrid design will provide insight into a dose-response relationship between the extent of implementation fidelity and effectiveness outcomes, as well as how to incorporate HN-STAR into standard practice outside the research setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Talya Salz
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Street, New York, NY 10065, USA.
| | - Jamie S Ostroff
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Street, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Chandylen L Nightingale
- Wake Forest School of Medicine, Department of Social Sciences & Health Policy, Medical Center Boulevard, Winston-Salem, NC 27157, USA
| | - Thomas M Atkinson
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Street, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Eleanor C Davidson
- Wake Forest School of Medicine, Department of Social Sciences & Health Policy, Medical Center Boulevard, Winston-Salem, NC 27157, USA
| | - Sankeerth R Jinna
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Street, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Anuja Kriplani
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Street, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Glenn J Lesser
- Wake Forest School of Medicine, Department of Social Sciences & Health Policy, Medical Center Boulevard, Winston-Salem, NC 27157, USA
| | - Kathleen A Lynch
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Street, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Deborah K Mayer
- University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, 450 West Dr, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA
| | - Kevin C Oeffinger
- Duke Cancer Institute, 2424 Erwin Dr, Suite 601, Durham, NC 27705, USA
| | - Sujata Patil
- The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, 9500 Euclid Avenue, CA6-160, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA
| | - Andrew L Salner
- Hartford HealthCare Cancer Institute at Hartford Hospital, 79 Retreat Ave, Hartford, CT 06106, USA
| | - Kathryn E Weaver
- Wake Forest School of Medicine, Department of Social Sciences & Health Policy, Medical Center Boulevard, Winston-Salem, NC 27157, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Biddell CB, Spees LP, Mayer DK, Wheeler SB, Trogdon JG, Rotter J, Birken SA. Developing personalized survivorship care pathways in the United States: Existing resources and remaining challenges. Cancer 2020; 127:997-1004. [PMID: 33259060 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.33355] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2020] [Revised: 10/27/2020] [Accepted: 11/12/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Caitlin B Biddell
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Lisa P Spees
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.,Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Deborah K Mayer
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.,School of Nursing, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Stephanie B Wheeler
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.,Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Justin G Trogdon
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.,Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | | | - Sarah A Birken
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.,Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Lee CT, Mohamed NE, Pisipati S, Shah QN, Agarwal PK, Downs TM, Droller M, Gilbert SM, Goltz HH, Hall SJ, Hendawi M, Hoffman-Censits J, O’Donnell M, Kaag M, Karsh LI, Kassouf W, Quale DZ, Sagalowsky A, Steinberg GD, Latini DM. Development and evaluation of a bladder Cancer specific survivorship care plan by patients and clinical care providers: a multi-methods approach. BMC Health Serv Res 2020; 20:686. [PMID: 32709234 PMCID: PMC7379822 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-020-05533-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2019] [Accepted: 07/13/2020] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND, CONTEXT AND PURPOSE In spite of the mixed evidence for their impact, survivorship Care Plans (SCPs) are recommended to enhance quality of care for cancer survivors. Data on the feasibility of SCPs in bladder cancer (BC) is sparse. Using a mixed-methods approach, this study describes the iterative development, acceptability and feasibility of BC specific SCP (BC-SCP) in clinical settings. METHODS In Phase I, we developed the BC-SCP. In Phase II, we conducted four focus groups with 19 patients and 15 providers to examine its acceptability and usability challenges. Data analyses using the Atlas.ti program, informed refinement of the BC-SCP. In Phase III, we conducted feasibility testing of the refined BC-SCP with 18 providers from 12 health-centers. An encounter survey was completed after each assessment to examine the feasibility of the BC-SCP. Chi-square and Fisher Exact tests were used for comparative analyses. RESULTS During phase I, we observed high patient and provider acceptability of the BC-SCP and substantial engagement in improving its content, design, and structure. In Phase II, providers completed 59 BC-SCPs. Mean time for BC-SCP completion was 12.3 min. Providers reported that BC-SCP content was clear, did not hamper clinic flow and was readily completed with easy-to-access information. Comparative analyses to examine differences in SCP completion time by patient clinico-demographic characteristics and provider type revealed no significant differences. CONCLUSIONS Our BC-SCP has clinical relevance, and can be used in an active practice setting. However, considerable progress will be necessary to achieve implementation of and sharing the BC-SCP with patients and care providers, particularly within the electronic medical record. In summary, BC-SCPs are essential to improve the follow up care of BC survivors. Clinical resources are required to ensure appropriate implementation of BC-SCPs. TRIAL REGISTRATION Study HUM00056082.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cheryl T. Lee
- Department of Urology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH USA
| | - Nihal E. Mohamed
- Department of Urology and Oncological Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 1 Gustave L Levy Place, New York, NY 10029 USA
| | | | - Qainat N. Shah
- Department of Urology and Oncological Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 1 Gustave L Levy Place, New York, NY 10029 USA
| | | | | | - Michael Droller
- Department of Urology and Oncological Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 1 Gustave L Levy Place, New York, NY 10029 USA
| | | | - Heather H. Goltz
- Social Work Program, University of Houston-Downtown, Houston, TX USA
- Section of Infectious Diseases, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX USA
| | - Simon J. Hall
- Smith Institute for Urology, Hofstra School of Medicine/Northwell Health System, Lake Success, NY USA
| | - Mohamed Hendawi
- Department of Urology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Hua A, Sesto ME, Zhang X, Wassenaar TR, Tevaarwerk AJ. Impact of Survivorship Care Plans and Planning on Breast, Colon, and Prostate Cancer Survivors in a Community Oncology Practice. JOURNAL OF CANCER EDUCATION : THE OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR CANCER EDUCATION 2020; 35:249-255. [PMID: 30610655 PMCID: PMC6609493 DOI: 10.1007/s13187-018-1457-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
With a growing number of cancer survivors, survivorship care plans (SCPs) are recommended to communicate information about late effects of treatment and follow-up care. Community oncology practices follow 85% of adult cancer survivors but report more difficulty in providing SCPs compared to academic centers. Our objective was to evaluate the impact of delivering SCPs in a community oncology practice by examining awareness of SCP receipt as well as how provision affects survivors' perception of care quality and of their condition. Survivors who accepted a SCP as standard of care were recruited from a community oncology practice in the Midwest and completed surveys prior to SCP provision (baseline) and 4 weeks later (follow-up). Within-survivor changes in knowledge of SCP receipt, satisfaction and perceived care coordination were assessed. Thirty cancer survivors (breast, colon, and prostate) completed the baseline survey, while 24 completed the follow-up survey (80% response rate). Participants reported receiving SCPs and treatment summaries more frequently at follow-up after receiving a SCP. At follow-up, there was a significant increase in survivor activation and involvement in care along with satisfaction of knowledge of care. Communication about and during SCP provision may need to be clearer: 34% of survivors could not correctly identify SCP receipt in this study. This may place these survivors at a disadvantage, if this leads to less awareness of important information regarding follow-up surveillance and management. Of those aware of SCP receipt, SCP provision had positive impacts in this small, short-term study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandra Hua
- University of Wisconsin, School of Medicine & Public Health, Madison, USA
| | - Mary E Sesto
- University of Wisconsin, School of Medicine & Public Health, Madison, USA
- Carbone Cancer Center, Madison, WI, USA
| | | | | | - Amye J Tevaarwerk
- University of Wisconsin, School of Medicine & Public Health, Madison, USA.
- Carbone Cancer Center, Madison, WI, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Flores T, Glaser KM, McDaniel D, Rokitka D, Amato KA, Reid ME. Building a comprehensive cancer survivorship program. Ecancermedicalscience 2020; 13:992. [PMID: 32010216 PMCID: PMC6974369 DOI: 10.3332/ecancer.2019.992] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2019] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
There is a significant increase in the number of people surviving cancer as a result of improved detection and better treatments. In the United States (US) alone, these numbers are estimated to reach 20 million by 2026 [Miller et al (2016) CA Cancer J Clin 66(4) 271–289)]; [Bluethmann et al (2016) Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 25(7) 1029–1036]. Living through cancer treatment represents a life-changing event, often including residual and long-term emotional, physical, psychological and spiritual sequelae. Survivorship programming must encompass the clinical management of medical issues, local support services for patients and their caregivers, protocols for communicating with community primary care providers (PCPs) and education for all clinicians in the survivorship continuum on the issues impacting survivors. This article will discuss a range of issues that should be addressed when developing a comprehensive, multi-disciplinary cancer survivorship care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tessa Flores
- Department of Medicine, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY 14263, USA
| | - Kathryn M Glaser
- Department of Cancer Prevention and Populations Science, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY 14263, USA
| | - Douglas McDaniel
- Department of Cancer Prevention and Populations Science, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY 14263, USA.,Department of Pediatric Oncology, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY 14263, USA
| | - Denise Rokitka
- Department of Pediatric Oncology, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY 14263, USA
| | - Katharine A Amato
- Department of Health Behavior, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY 14263, USA.,Department of Family Medicine, Primary Care Research Institute, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY 14260, USA
| | - Mary E Reid
- Department of Medicine, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY 14263, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Swoboda CM, Fareed N, Walker DM, Huerta TR. The effect of cancer treatment summaries on patient-centered communication and quality of care for cancer survivors: A pooled cross-sectional HINTS analysis. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2020; 103:301-308. [PMID: 31477514 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2019.08.036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2019] [Revised: 08/21/2019] [Accepted: 08/25/2019] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Provision of cancer treatment summaries to patients is recommended to improve patient-centered communication (PCC). The objective of this study is to assess relationships between cancer treatment summary receipt, PCC, and quality of care (QOC). METHODS Linear and logistic regression of cross-sectional data from the Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS) was conducted using data from years 2012, 2014, and 2017. The independent variable was receipt of treatment summary; the dependent variables were overall PCC score, six domains of PCC, and QOC. RESULTS In the pooled sample, 36.9% of patients with cancer treatment history reported receiving a treatment summary. There was a significant positive association between overall PCC score and treatment summary receipt, and higher odds of high scores for the PCC domains "responding to emotions" and "managing uncertainty." We did not observe significant associations between treatment summary receipt and other PCC domains or QOC. CONCLUSION Providing patients cancer treatment summaries may improve PCC, but fewer than half of patients reported receiving one of these summaries. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS Providing cancer treatment summaries is important, however, providing them without engaging in additional communication may be insufficient to improve all patient-centered care domains or quality of care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christine M Swoboda
- CATALYST - The Center for the Advancement of Team Science, Analytics, and Systems Thinking, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
| | - Naleef Fareed
- CATALYST - The Center for the Advancement of Team Science, Analytics, and Systems Thinking, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA; Department of Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Daniel M Walker
- CATALYST - The Center for the Advancement of Team Science, Analytics, and Systems Thinking, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA; Department of Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA; Department of Family Medicine, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Timothy R Huerta
- CATALYST - The Center for the Advancement of Team Science, Analytics, and Systems Thinking, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA; Department of Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA; Department of Family Medicine, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Anbari AB, Wanchai A, Graves R. Breast cancer survivorship in rural settings: a systematic review. Support Care Cancer 2020; 28:3517-3531. [DOI: 10.1007/s00520-020-05308-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2019] [Accepted: 01/14/2020] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
|
15
|
Drury A, Payne S, Brady AM. Identifying associations between quality of life outcomes and healthcare-related variables among colorectal cancer survivors: A cross-sectional survey study. Int J Nurs Stud 2020; 101:103434. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2019.103434] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2019] [Revised: 09/10/2019] [Accepted: 09/13/2019] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
|
16
|
Laufer T, Lerner B, Petrich A, Quinn AM, Ernst L, Roop A, Knoblauch J, Leasure NC, Jaslow RJ, Hegarty S, Leader A, Barsevick A. Evaluation of a Technology-Based Survivor Care Plan for Breast Cancer Survivors: Pre-Post Pilot Study. JMIR Cancer 2019; 5:e12090. [PMID: 31859683 PMCID: PMC6942181 DOI: 10.2196/12090] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2018] [Revised: 05/21/2019] [Accepted: 09/03/2019] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background As of 2016, almost 16 million individuals were cancer survivors, including over 3.5 million survivors of breast cancer. Because cancer survivors are living longer and have unique health care needs, the Institute of Medicine proposed a survivor care plan as a way to alleviate the many medical, emotional, and care coordination problems of survivors. Objective This pilot study for breast cancer survivors was undertaken to: (1) examine self-reported changes in knowledge, confidence, and activation from before receipt to after receipt of a survivor care plan; and (2) describe survivor preferences for, and satisfaction with, a technology-based survivor care plan. Methods A single group pretest-posttest design was used to study breast cancer survivors in an academic cancer center and a community cancer center during their medical visit after they completed chemotherapy. The intervention was a technology-based survivor care plan. Measures were taken before, immediately after, and 1 month after receipt of the survivor care plan. Results A total of 38 breast cancer survivors agreed to participate in the study. Compared to baseline levels before receipt of the survivor care plan, participants reported increased knowledge both immediately after its receipt at the academic center (P<.001) and the community center (P<.001) as well as one month later at the academic center (P=.002) and the community center (P<.001). Participants also reported increased confidence immediately following receipt of the survivor care plan at the academic center (P=.63) and the community center (P=.003) and one month later at both the academic center (P=.63) and the community center (P<.001). Activation was increased from baseline to post-survivor care plan at both the academic center (P=.05) and community center (P<.001) as well as from baseline to 1-month follow-up at the academic center (P=.56) and the community center (P<.001). Overall, community center participants had lower knowledge, confidence, and activation at baseline compared with academic center participants. Overall, 22/38 (58%) participants chose the fully functional electronic survivor care plan. However, 12/23 (52%) in the community center group chose the paper version compared to 4/15 (27%) in the academic center group. Satisfaction with the format (38/38 participants) and the content (37/38 participants) of the survivor care plan was high for both groups. Conclusions This study provides evidence that knowledge, confidence, and activation of survivors were associated with implementation of the survivor care plan. This research agrees with previous research showing that cancer survivors found the technology-based survivor care plan to be acceptable. More research is needed to determine the optimal approach to survivor care planning to ensure that all cancer survivors can benefit from it.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Talya Laufer
- Division of Population Science, Department of Medical Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Bryan Lerner
- Division of Population Science, Department of Medical Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Anett Petrich
- Division of Population Science, Department of Medical Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Anna M Quinn
- Division of Population Science, Department of Medical Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Leah Ernst
- McGlinn Cancer Institute, Reading Health System, West Reading, PA, United States
| | - Alicin Roop
- McGlinn Cancer Institute, Reading Health System, West Reading, PA, United States
| | - Janet Knoblauch
- McGlinn Cancer Institute, Reading Health System, West Reading, PA, United States
| | - Nick C Leasure
- McGlinn Cancer Institute, Reading Health System, West Reading, PA, United States
| | - Rebecca J Jaslow
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Sarah Hegarty
- Division of Biostatistics, Department of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Amy Leader
- Division of Population Science, Department of Medical Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Andrea Barsevick
- Division of Population Science, Department of Medical Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Hill RE, Wakefield CE, Cohn RJ, Fardell JE, Brierley MEE, Kothe E, Jacobsen PB, Hetherington K, Mercieca-Bebber R. Survivorship Care Plans in Cancer: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review of Care Plan Outcomes. Oncologist 2019; 25:e351-e372. [PMID: 32043786 DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2019-0184] [Citation(s) in RCA: 89] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2019] [Accepted: 09/06/2019] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Institute of Medicine recommends that survivorship care plans (SCPs) be included in cancer survivorship care. Our meta-analysis compares patient-reported outcomes between SCP and no SCP (control) conditions for cancer survivors. Our systematic review examines the feasibility of implementing SCPs from survivors' and health care professionals' perspectives and the impact of SCPs on health care professionals' knowledge and survivorship care provision. METHODS We searched seven online databases (inception to April 22, 2018) for articles assessing SCP feasibility and health care professional outcomes. Randomized controlled trials comparing patient-reported outcomes for SCP recipients versus controls were eligible for the meta-analysis. We performed random-effects meta-analyses using pooled standardized mean differences for each patient-reported outcome. RESULTS Eight articles were eligible for the meta-analysis (n = 1,286 survivors) and 50 for the systematic review (n = 18,949 survivors; n = 3,739 health care professionals). There were no significant differences between SCP recipients and controls at 6 months postintervention on self-reported cancer and survivorship knowledge, physical functioning, satisfaction with information provision, or self-efficacy or at 12 months on anxiety, cancer-specific distress, depression, or satisfaction with follow-up care. SCPs appear to be acceptable and potentially improve survivors' adherence to medical recommendations and health care professionals' knowledge of survivorship care and late effects. CONCLUSION SCPs appear feasible but do not improve survivors' patient-reported outcomes. Research should ascertain whether this is due to SCP ineffectiveness, implementation issues, or inappropriate research design of comparative effectiveness studies. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE Several organizations recommend that cancer survivors receive a survivorship care plan (SCP) after their cancer treatment; however, the impact of SCPs on cancer survivors and health care professionals is unclear. This systematic review suggests that although SCPs appear to be feasible and may improve health care professionals' knowledge of late effects and survivorship care, there is no evidence that SCPs affect cancer survivors' patient-reported outcomes. In order to justify the ongoing implementation of SCPs, additional research should evaluate SCP implementation and the research design of comparative effectiveness studies. Discussion may also be needed regarding the possibility that SCPs are fundamentally ineffective.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca E Hill
- School of Women's and Children's Health, University of New South Wales (UNSW) Sydney, Randwick, Australia
- Behavioural Sciences Unit, Kids Cancer Centre, Sydney Children's Hospital, Randwick, Australia
| | - Claire E Wakefield
- School of Women's and Children's Health, University of New South Wales (UNSW) Sydney, Randwick, Australia
- Behavioural Sciences Unit, Kids Cancer Centre, Sydney Children's Hospital, Randwick, Australia
| | - Richard J Cohn
- School of Women's and Children's Health, University of New South Wales (UNSW) Sydney, Randwick, Australia
- Behavioural Sciences Unit, Kids Cancer Centre, Sydney Children's Hospital, Randwick, Australia
| | - Joanna E Fardell
- School of Women's and Children's Health, University of New South Wales (UNSW) Sydney, Randwick, Australia
- Behavioural Sciences Unit, Kids Cancer Centre, Sydney Children's Hospital, Randwick, Australia
| | - Mary-Ellen E Brierley
- School of Women's and Children's Health, University of New South Wales (UNSW) Sydney, Randwick, Australia
- Behavioural Sciences Unit, Kids Cancer Centre, Sydney Children's Hospital, Randwick, Australia
| | - Emily Kothe
- School of Psychology, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia
| | | | - Kate Hetherington
- School of Women's and Children's Health, University of New South Wales (UNSW) Sydney, Randwick, Australia
- Behavioural Sciences Unit, Kids Cancer Centre, Sydney Children's Hospital, Randwick, Australia
| | - Rebecca Mercieca-Bebber
- School of Women's and Children's Health, University of New South Wales (UNSW) Sydney, Randwick, Australia
- Behavioural Sciences Unit, Kids Cancer Centre, Sydney Children's Hospital, Randwick, Australia
- National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) Clinical Trials Centre, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Salz T, Schnall RB, McCabe MS, Oeffinger KC, Corcoran S, Vickers AJ, Salner AL, Dornelas E, Raghunathan NJ, Fortier E, McKiernan J, Finitsis DJ, Chimonas S, Baxi S. Incorporating Multiple Perspectives Into the Development of an Electronic Survivorship Platform for Head and Neck Cancer. JCO Clin Cancer Inform 2019; 2:1-15. [PMID: 30652547 DOI: 10.1200/cci.17.00105] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To improve the care of survivors of head and neck cancer, we developed the Head and Neck Survivorship Tool: Assessment and Recommendations (HN-STAR). HN-STAR is an electronic platform that incorporates patient-reported outcomes into a clinical decision support tool for use at a survivorship visit. Selections in the clinical decision support tool automatically populate a survivorship care plan (SCP). We aimed to refine HN-STAR by eliciting and incorporating feedback on its ease of use and usefulness. METHODS Human-computer interaction (HCI) experts reviewed HN-STAR using think-aloud testing and the Nielsen Heuristic Checklist. Nurse practitioners (NPs) thought aloud while reviewing the clinical decision support tool and SCP and responded to an interview. Survivors used HN-STAR as part of a routine visit and were interviewed afterward. We analyzed themes from the feedback. We described how we addressed each theme to improve the usability of HN-STAR. RESULTS Five HCI experts, 10 NPs, and 10 cancer survivors provided complementary usability insight that we categorized into themes of improvements. For ease of use, themes included technical design considerations to enhance user interface, ease of completion of a self-assessment, streamlining text, disruption of the clinic visit, and threshold for symptoms to appear on the SCP. The theme addressing usefulness was efficiency and comprehensiveness of the clinic visit. For each theme, we report revisions to HN-STAR in response to the feedback. CONCLUSION HCI experts provided key technical design insights into HN-STAR, whereas NPs and survivors provided usability feedback and clinical perspectives. We incorporated the feedback into the preparation for additional testing of HN-STAR. This method can inform and improve the ease of use and usefulness of the survivorship applications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Talya Salz
- Talya Salz, Mary S. McCabe, Stacie Corcoran, Andrew J. Vickers, Nirupa J. Raghunathan, Elizabeth Fortier, Janet McKiernan, Susan Chimonas, and Shrujal Baxi, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Rebecca B. Schnall, Columbia University School of Nursing, New York, NY; Kevin C. Oeffinger, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Andrew L. Salner, Ellen Dornelas, and David J. Finitsis, Hartford HealthCare Cancer Institute, Hartford, CT; and Shrujal Baxi, Weill-Cornell School of Medicine, New York, NY
| | - Rebecca B Schnall
- Talya Salz, Mary S. McCabe, Stacie Corcoran, Andrew J. Vickers, Nirupa J. Raghunathan, Elizabeth Fortier, Janet McKiernan, Susan Chimonas, and Shrujal Baxi, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Rebecca B. Schnall, Columbia University School of Nursing, New York, NY; Kevin C. Oeffinger, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Andrew L. Salner, Ellen Dornelas, and David J. Finitsis, Hartford HealthCare Cancer Institute, Hartford, CT; and Shrujal Baxi, Weill-Cornell School of Medicine, New York, NY
| | - Mary S McCabe
- Talya Salz, Mary S. McCabe, Stacie Corcoran, Andrew J. Vickers, Nirupa J. Raghunathan, Elizabeth Fortier, Janet McKiernan, Susan Chimonas, and Shrujal Baxi, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Rebecca B. Schnall, Columbia University School of Nursing, New York, NY; Kevin C. Oeffinger, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Andrew L. Salner, Ellen Dornelas, and David J. Finitsis, Hartford HealthCare Cancer Institute, Hartford, CT; and Shrujal Baxi, Weill-Cornell School of Medicine, New York, NY
| | - Kevin C Oeffinger
- Talya Salz, Mary S. McCabe, Stacie Corcoran, Andrew J. Vickers, Nirupa J. Raghunathan, Elizabeth Fortier, Janet McKiernan, Susan Chimonas, and Shrujal Baxi, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Rebecca B. Schnall, Columbia University School of Nursing, New York, NY; Kevin C. Oeffinger, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Andrew L. Salner, Ellen Dornelas, and David J. Finitsis, Hartford HealthCare Cancer Institute, Hartford, CT; and Shrujal Baxi, Weill-Cornell School of Medicine, New York, NY
| | - Stacie Corcoran
- Talya Salz, Mary S. McCabe, Stacie Corcoran, Andrew J. Vickers, Nirupa J. Raghunathan, Elizabeth Fortier, Janet McKiernan, Susan Chimonas, and Shrujal Baxi, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Rebecca B. Schnall, Columbia University School of Nursing, New York, NY; Kevin C. Oeffinger, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Andrew L. Salner, Ellen Dornelas, and David J. Finitsis, Hartford HealthCare Cancer Institute, Hartford, CT; and Shrujal Baxi, Weill-Cornell School of Medicine, New York, NY
| | - Andrew J Vickers
- Talya Salz, Mary S. McCabe, Stacie Corcoran, Andrew J. Vickers, Nirupa J. Raghunathan, Elizabeth Fortier, Janet McKiernan, Susan Chimonas, and Shrujal Baxi, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Rebecca B. Schnall, Columbia University School of Nursing, New York, NY; Kevin C. Oeffinger, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Andrew L. Salner, Ellen Dornelas, and David J. Finitsis, Hartford HealthCare Cancer Institute, Hartford, CT; and Shrujal Baxi, Weill-Cornell School of Medicine, New York, NY
| | - Andrew L Salner
- Talya Salz, Mary S. McCabe, Stacie Corcoran, Andrew J. Vickers, Nirupa J. Raghunathan, Elizabeth Fortier, Janet McKiernan, Susan Chimonas, and Shrujal Baxi, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Rebecca B. Schnall, Columbia University School of Nursing, New York, NY; Kevin C. Oeffinger, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Andrew L. Salner, Ellen Dornelas, and David J. Finitsis, Hartford HealthCare Cancer Institute, Hartford, CT; and Shrujal Baxi, Weill-Cornell School of Medicine, New York, NY
| | - Ellen Dornelas
- Talya Salz, Mary S. McCabe, Stacie Corcoran, Andrew J. Vickers, Nirupa J. Raghunathan, Elizabeth Fortier, Janet McKiernan, Susan Chimonas, and Shrujal Baxi, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Rebecca B. Schnall, Columbia University School of Nursing, New York, NY; Kevin C. Oeffinger, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Andrew L. Salner, Ellen Dornelas, and David J. Finitsis, Hartford HealthCare Cancer Institute, Hartford, CT; and Shrujal Baxi, Weill-Cornell School of Medicine, New York, NY
| | - Nirupa J Raghunathan
- Talya Salz, Mary S. McCabe, Stacie Corcoran, Andrew J. Vickers, Nirupa J. Raghunathan, Elizabeth Fortier, Janet McKiernan, Susan Chimonas, and Shrujal Baxi, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Rebecca B. Schnall, Columbia University School of Nursing, New York, NY; Kevin C. Oeffinger, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Andrew L. Salner, Ellen Dornelas, and David J. Finitsis, Hartford HealthCare Cancer Institute, Hartford, CT; and Shrujal Baxi, Weill-Cornell School of Medicine, New York, NY
| | - Elizabeth Fortier
- Talya Salz, Mary S. McCabe, Stacie Corcoran, Andrew J. Vickers, Nirupa J. Raghunathan, Elizabeth Fortier, Janet McKiernan, Susan Chimonas, and Shrujal Baxi, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Rebecca B. Schnall, Columbia University School of Nursing, New York, NY; Kevin C. Oeffinger, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Andrew L. Salner, Ellen Dornelas, and David J. Finitsis, Hartford HealthCare Cancer Institute, Hartford, CT; and Shrujal Baxi, Weill-Cornell School of Medicine, New York, NY
| | - Janet McKiernan
- Talya Salz, Mary S. McCabe, Stacie Corcoran, Andrew J. Vickers, Nirupa J. Raghunathan, Elizabeth Fortier, Janet McKiernan, Susan Chimonas, and Shrujal Baxi, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Rebecca B. Schnall, Columbia University School of Nursing, New York, NY; Kevin C. Oeffinger, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Andrew L. Salner, Ellen Dornelas, and David J. Finitsis, Hartford HealthCare Cancer Institute, Hartford, CT; and Shrujal Baxi, Weill-Cornell School of Medicine, New York, NY
| | - David J Finitsis
- Talya Salz, Mary S. McCabe, Stacie Corcoran, Andrew J. Vickers, Nirupa J. Raghunathan, Elizabeth Fortier, Janet McKiernan, Susan Chimonas, and Shrujal Baxi, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Rebecca B. Schnall, Columbia University School of Nursing, New York, NY; Kevin C. Oeffinger, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Andrew L. Salner, Ellen Dornelas, and David J. Finitsis, Hartford HealthCare Cancer Institute, Hartford, CT; and Shrujal Baxi, Weill-Cornell School of Medicine, New York, NY
| | - Susan Chimonas
- Talya Salz, Mary S. McCabe, Stacie Corcoran, Andrew J. Vickers, Nirupa J. Raghunathan, Elizabeth Fortier, Janet McKiernan, Susan Chimonas, and Shrujal Baxi, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Rebecca B. Schnall, Columbia University School of Nursing, New York, NY; Kevin C. Oeffinger, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Andrew L. Salner, Ellen Dornelas, and David J. Finitsis, Hartford HealthCare Cancer Institute, Hartford, CT; and Shrujal Baxi, Weill-Cornell School of Medicine, New York, NY
| | - Shrujal Baxi
- Talya Salz, Mary S. McCabe, Stacie Corcoran, Andrew J. Vickers, Nirupa J. Raghunathan, Elizabeth Fortier, Janet McKiernan, Susan Chimonas, and Shrujal Baxi, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Rebecca B. Schnall, Columbia University School of Nursing, New York, NY; Kevin C. Oeffinger, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Andrew L. Salner, Ellen Dornelas, and David J. Finitsis, Hartford HealthCare Cancer Institute, Hartford, CT; and Shrujal Baxi, Weill-Cornell School of Medicine, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Soulia SL, Duffy EA, Morley KA, Smith EML. Implementation of a Survivorship Care Plan Program in a Community-Based Oncology Clinic. J Adv Pract Oncol 2019; 10:665-676. [PMID: 33391851 PMCID: PMC7517781 DOI: 10.6004/jadpro.2019.10.7.3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
There is conflicting evidence from the small number of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that have assessed the benefit of survivorship care plans (SCPs) on improving patient outcomes. Yet, published quasi-experimental and descriptive studies provide preliminary evidence suggesting that using survivorship care plans in practice may improve patient knowledge, decrease worry and anxiety, and lead to patient and primary care physician satisfaction. Given the conflicting evidence and the paucity of RCTs, further research is needed to more fully explore the effect of SCP on patient outcomes. To address this knowledge gap, an SCP program was implemented in a community-based oncology clinic and used quality improvement methodology to assess the effect on patient knowledge of diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up, and to understand patients’ satisfaction with the current SCP program. A total of 30 cancer patients were recruited in Southeast Michigan to participate in an SCP quality improvement project and completed surveys to evaluate the SCP program. Data were collected between December 2017 and March 2018. We observed a statistically significant (p = .028) difference between pre- and postintervention (survivorship care plan visit) knowledge scores about cancer diagnosis, treatment received, and follow-up recommendations. Moreover, participants were satisfied with the survivorship care plan and visit.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Ellen M L Smith
- University of Michigan School of Nursing, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
The role of primary care in supporting patients living with and beyond cancer. Curr Opin Support Palliat Care 2019; 12:261-267. [PMID: 30074923 DOI: 10.1097/spc.0000000000000369] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW The prevalence of cancer survivors is increasing. Those living with and beyond a cancer diagnosis have a range of physical, psychosocial and practical needs. This review aims to discuss the role of primary care in meeting these needs. RECENT FINDINGS Patients have increased contact with primary care after a cancer diagnosis but the role of the primary care team in the formal delivery of cancer aftercare is not clearly defined and varies depending on setting and context. Research suggests that both patients and health professionals are receptive to greater involvement of primary care, with informational and personal continuity of care, and good co-ordination of care being particularly valued by patients. Recent evidence indicates that shared care between oncologists and primary care physicians can be as effective as and more cost effective than secondary care-led follow-up, and that primary-care nurses could play a role in optimizing survivorship care. SUMMARY The four pillars of primary care - contact, comprehensiveness, continuity and coordination - are recurring themes in the cancer survivorship literature and emphasize that the traditional core values of general practice lend themselves to innovative interventions to improve the efficiency and efficacy of survivorship care.
Collapse
|
21
|
McDowell BD, Klemp J, Blaes A, Cohee AA, Trentham-Dietz A, Kamaraju S, Otte JL, Mott SL, Chrischilles EA. The association between cancer care coordination and quality of life is stronger for breast cancer patients with lower health literacy: A Greater Plains Collaborative study. Support Care Cancer 2019; 28:887-895. [PMID: 31168710 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-019-04894-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2019] [Accepted: 05/22/2019] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Health literacy (HL) and cancer care coordination (CCC) were examined for their relationship to quality of life (QOL) among breast cancer survivors. CCC was hypothesized to have a stronger relationship to QOL for women with lower HL. METHODS Women (N = 1138) who had completed treatment for Stage 0-III, ductal carcinoma breast cancer between January 2013 and May 2014 at one of eight large medical centers responded to a mailed questionnaire. Responses to questions about survivorship care planning and presence of professional care coordinator were combined to form an index of CCC. An index of HL was also derived. QOL was measured using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast (FACT-B) scales. RESULTS 74.3% (N = 845) of patients reported having a health professional coordinate their care during treatment and 78.8% (N = 897) reported receiving survivorship care planning. CCC was classified as none, partial, or high for 7.1%, 32.7%, and 60.2% of the patients, respectively. Except for emotional well-being, the interaction between HL and CCC was significant for all QOL domains (p < .05); the effect of CCC on FACT-B scores was largest for people with lower HL. For the 39.8% of patients with less than high CCC, 111 (27.3%) had a level of HL associated with clinically meaningful lower QOL. CONCLUSIONS The association between CCC and later QOL is strongest for people who have lower HL. Prioritizing care coordination for patients with lower health literacy may be an effective strategy in a setting of limited resources.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bradley D McDowell
- 5240 MERF, Holden Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, 52242, USA.
| | - Jennifer Klemp
- Department of Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center and University of Kansas Cancer Center, Kansas City, KS, USA
| | - Anne Blaes
- Division of Hematology, Oncology and Transplantation, 420 Delaware St SE, MMC 480, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA
| | - Andrea A Cohee
- Community and Health Systems, Nursing W433, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, 47405, USA
| | - Amy Trentham-Dietz
- Carbone Cancer Center and Department of Population Health Sciences, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 610 Walnut St., WARF Room 307, Madison, WI, 53726, USA
| | - Sailaja Kamaraju
- Division of Hematology, Oncology and Transplantation, Medical College of Wisconsin, Watertown Plank Road, 4th Fl Cancer Center, Milwaukee, WI, 53226, USA
| | - Julie L Otte
- Science of Nursing Care, Nursing W401, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, 46220, USA
| | - Sarah L Mott
- N319 CPHB, Holden Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, 52242, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Birken SA, Raskin S, Zhang Y, Lane G, Zizzi A, Pratt-Chapman M. Survivorship Care Plan Implementation in US Cancer Programs: a National Survey of Cancer Care Providers. JOURNAL OF CANCER EDUCATION : THE OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR CANCER EDUCATION 2019; 34:614-622. [PMID: 29948925 PMCID: PMC6294719 DOI: 10.1007/s13187-018-1374-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/08/2023]
Abstract
Survivorship care plans (SCPs)-documents intended to improve care for cancer survivors who have completed active treatment-are required, yet implementation is poor. We sought to understand SCP implementation in cancer programs in the USA with the objective of identifying opportunities for improvement. We recruited cancer care providers in the USA via several cancer care networks to participate in a survey regarding SCP implementation. We used descriptive statistics to analyze the data. Three hundred ninety-five providers from diverse cancer programs in 47 states and Washington, DC responded to the survey. The timing of SCP implementation varied across and within cancer programs, with approximately 40% of respondents reporting developing SCPs more than 3 months after primary treatment or adjuvant therapy completion. Nurse navigators were responsible for 48-58% of each stage of SCP implementation. Processes that could have been automated often occurred in-person or via phone and vice versa. Respondents reported spending more than 2 h per SCP to complete all stages of implementation, of which less than a third was reimbursed by third-party payers. We identified several opportunities for improving SCP implementation, including broadening the base of responsibility, optimizing modes of communication, decreasing the time required and increasing the funding available, and limiting variation in SCP implementation across and within cancer programs. Future work should assess the influence of approaches to SCP implementation on desired outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah A Birken
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 1103E McGavran-Greenberg, 135 Dauer Drive, Campus Box 7411, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-7411, USA.
| | - Sarah Raskin
- L. Douglas Wilder School of Government and Public Affairs, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA
| | - Yuqing Zhang
- Institute for Patient-Centered Initiatives & Health Equity, The George Washington University Cancer Center, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Gema Lane
- Institute for Patient-Centered Initiatives & Health Equity, The George Washington University Cancer Center, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Alexandra Zizzi
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 1103E McGavran-Greenberg, 135 Dauer Drive, Campus Box 7411, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-7411, USA
| | - Mandi Pratt-Chapman
- Institute for Patient-Centered Initiatives & Health Equity, The George Washington University Cancer Center, Washington, DC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Zullig LL, Ramos K, Berkowitz C, Miller JJ, Dolor RJ, Koontz BF, Yousuf Zafar S, Hutch Allen D, Tenhover JA, Bosworth HB. Assessing Key Stakeholders' Knowledge, Needs, and Preferences for Head and Neck Cancer Survivorship Care Plans. JOURNAL OF CANCER EDUCATION : THE OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR CANCER EDUCATION 2019; 34:584-591. [PMID: 29526021 PMCID: PMC8101022 DOI: 10.1007/s13187-018-1345-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/29/2023]
Abstract
Cancer survivorship care plans (SCPs) are endorsed to support quality care for cancer survivors, but uptake is slow. We assessed knowledge, needs, and preferences for SCP content and delivery from a wide variety of stakeholders. We focused SCP content for head and neck cancer as it is a disease prone to long-term side effects requiring management from multiple providers. We conducted telephone-based, qualitative interviews. We purposively sampled head and neck cancer survivors (n = 4), primary care physicians in the community (n = 5), and providers affiliated with a large academic medical center (n = 5) who treat head and neck cancer, cancer specialists (n = 6), and nurse practitioners/supportive care staff (n = 5). Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using direct content analysis. Few participants reported personal experience with SCPs, but most supported the concept. Several key themes emerged: (1) perceived ambiguity regarding roles and responsibilities for SCPs, (2) a need to tailor the content and language based on the intended recipient, (3) documentation process should be as automated and streamlined as possible, (4) concerns about using the SCP to coordinate with outside providers, and (5) that SCPs would have added value as a "living document." We also report SCP-related issues that are unique to serving patients diagnosed with head and neck cancer. Effort is needed to tailor SCPs for different recipients and optimize their potential for successful implementation, impact on care outcomes, and sustainability. Many cancer survivors may not receive a SCP as part of routine care. Survivors could engage their health care team by requesting a SCP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leah L Zullig
- Center for Health Services Research in Primary Care, Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care Center, Durham, NC, 27705, USA.
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, 27710, USA.
- Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, 27710, USA.
| | - Katherine Ramos
- Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center, Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care Center, Durham, NC, 27705, USA
| | | | - Julie J Miller
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, 27710, USA
| | - Rowena J Dolor
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, 27710, USA
| | - Bridget F Koontz
- Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, 27710, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, 27710, USA
| | - S Yousuf Zafar
- Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, 27710, USA
- Department of Medical Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, 27710, USA
| | - D Hutch Allen
- Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, 27710, USA
| | - Jennifer A Tenhover
- Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, 27710, USA
| | - Hayden B Bosworth
- Center for Health Services Research in Primary Care, Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care Center, Durham, NC, 27705, USA
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, 27710, USA
- Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, 27710, USA
- School of Nursing, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, 27710, USA
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC, 27710, USA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Efficacy of a web-based women's health survivorship care plan for young breast cancer survivors: a randomized controlled trial. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2019; 176:579-589. [PMID: 31054032 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-019-05260-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2019] [Accepted: 04/26/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Breast cancer survivorship care plans (SCP) have limited content addressing women's health issues. This trial tested if young breast cancer survivors who receive a web-based, women's health SCP were more likely to improve on at least one of the four targeted issues (hot flashes, fertility-related concerns, contraception, and vaginal symptoms) compared to attention controls. METHODS A randomized controlled trial recruited female survivors ages 18-45 at diagnosis, 18-50 at enrollment, completed primary cancer treatment, and had a significant women's health issue: moderate or higher fertility-related concerns; ≥ 4 hot flashes/day with ≥ 1 of moderate severity; ≥ 1 moderate vaginal atrophy symptoms; or not contracepting/using less effective methods. Survivors underwent stratified, block randomization with equal allocation to intervention and control groups. The intervention group accessed the online SCP; controls accessed curated resource lists. In intention-to-treat analysis, the primary outcome of improvement in at least one issue by 24 weeks was compared by group. RESULTS 182 participants (86 intervention, 96 control), mean age 40.0 ± 5.9 and 4.4 ± 3.2 years since diagnosis, were randomized. 61 intervention group participants (70.9%) improved, compared to 55 controls (57.3%) (OR 1.82, 95% CI 0.99-3.4, p = 0.057). The following issue-specific improvements were observed in the intervention versus control arms: fertility-related concerns (27.9% vs. 14.6%, OR 2.3, 95% CI 1.1-4.8); hot flashes (58.5% vs. 55.8%, OR 1.1, 95% CI 0.57-2.2); vaginal symptoms (42.5% vs. 40.7%, OR 1.1, 95% CI 0.6-2.0); contraception (50% vs. 42.6%, OR 1.4, 95% CI 0.74-2.5). CONCLUSIONS In young breast cancer survivors, a novel, web-based SCP did not result in more change in the primary outcome of improvement in at least one of the four targeted women's health issues, than the attention control condition. The intervention was associated with improved infertility concerns, supporting efficacy of disseminating accessible, evidence-based women's health information to this population.
Collapse
|
25
|
Beesley VL, Alemayehu C, Webb PM. A systematic literature review of trials of survivorship interventions for women with gynaecological cancer and their caregivers. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 2019; 28:e13057. [DOI: 10.1111/ecc.13057] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2018] [Revised: 03/11/2019] [Accepted: 03/25/2019] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Vanessa L. Beesley
- Gynaecological Cancers Group QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute Brisbane Queensland Australia
- School of Public Health and Social Work Queensland University of Technology Brisbane Queensland Australia
| | - Chalachew Alemayehu
- Gynaecological Cancers Group QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute Brisbane Queensland Australia
- Faculty of Medicine University of Queensland Brisbane Queensland Australia
| | - Penelope M. Webb
- Gynaecological Cancers Group QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute Brisbane Queensland Australia
- School of Public Health and Social Work Queensland University of Technology Brisbane Queensland Australia
- School of Public Health University of Queensland Brisbane Queensland Australia
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
|
27
|
Tevaarwerk AJ, Hocking WG, Buhr KA, Gribble M, Seaborne LA, Wisinski KB, Burkard ME, Yen T, Wiegmann DA, Sesto ME. A randomized trial of immediate versus delayed survivorship care plan receipt on patient satisfaction and knowledge of diagnosis and treatment. Cancer 2019; 125:1000-1007. [PMID: 30690714 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.31875] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2018] [Revised: 09/07/2018] [Accepted: 10/08/2018] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Survivorship care plans (SCPs) and care-planning sessions have been recommended for over a decade, yet evidence for their benefit remains mixed. In a randomized trial, changes in survivor knowledge and satisfaction before and after the receipt of an SCP were assessed. METHODS Patients with breast cancer who had completed curative-intent treatment were randomized to immediate versus delayed receipt of an individualized SCP. All participants completed the modified Wisconsin Survey of Cancer Diagnosis and Management in Breast Cancer and the Preparing for Life As a New Survivor survey to assess individual knowledge about cancer diagnosis, treatment, side effects, and follow-up as well as satisfaction with communication and care coordination. Surveys were completed at baseline, at 4 weeks (before delayed receipt), and again at 12 weeks (after all participants had received SCPs); the primary outcome was change in knowledge at 4 weeks. RESULTS In total, 127 eligible women were randomized. An improvement in individual knowledge was observed between baseline and week 12 for both arms combined (+1.6; 95% confidence interval, 0.9-2.3; P < .001). There was no statistically significant difference in the change in knowledge from baseline through week 4 between the arms. No significant change occurred for satisfaction scores over time. CONCLUSIONS This randomized trial of immediate versus delayed SCP receipt demonstrated a small improvement (4%) in survivor knowledge. However, this improvement did not appear to be related to SCP provision. The authors hypothesized that the improvement was because of repeated administration of the knowledge survey. If improved survivor knowledge is a goal, then strategies beyond the 1-time provision and review of an SCP should be explored.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amye J Tevaarwerk
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, The University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin.,The University of Wisconsin-Madison Carbone Cancer Center, Madison, Wisconsin
| | | | - Kevin A Buhr
- Department of Biostatistics and Medical Informatics, The University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin
| | - Mindy Gribble
- Marshfield Clinic Health System, Marshfield, Wisconsin
| | - Lori A Seaborne
- Department of Surgery, The University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin
| | - Kari B Wisinski
- The University of Wisconsin-Madison Carbone Cancer Center, Madison, Wisconsin.,The University of Wisconsin, School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin
| | - Mark E Burkard
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, The University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin.,The University of Wisconsin-Madison Carbone Cancer Center, Madison, Wisconsin
| | - Thomas Yen
- The University of Wisconsin, School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin
| | - Douglas A Wiegmann
- The University of Wisconsin, School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin
| | - Mary E Sesto
- The University of Wisconsin-Madison Carbone Cancer Center, Madison, Wisconsin.,Department of Medicine, The University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
de Rooij BH, Ezendam NPM, Vos MC, Pijnenborg JMA, Boll D, Kruitwagen RFPM, van de Poll-Franse LV. Patients' information coping styles influence the benefit of a survivorship care plan in the ROGY Care Trial: New insights for tailored delivery. Cancer 2018; 125:788-797. [PMID: 30500067 PMCID: PMC6587821 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.31844] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2018] [Revised: 09/14/2018] [Accepted: 09/27/2018] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In efforts to improve the implementation of survivorship care plans (SCPs), the authors assessed whether the impact of SCPs on patient-reported outcomes differed between patients with an information-seeking coping style (monitoring) versus those with an information-avoiding coping style (blunting). METHODS In the Registration System Oncological Gynecology (ROGY) Care Trial, 12 hospitals in the Netherlands were randomized to deliver SCP care or usual care. All patients with newly diagnosed endometrial and ovarian cancer in the SCP care arm received an SCP that was generated automatically by their oncology provider through the web-based ROGY registration system. Outcomes (satisfaction with information provision and care, illness perceptions, and health care use) were measured directly after initial treatment and after 6, 12, and 24 months. Information coping style was measured at 12 months after initial treatment. RESULTS Among patients who had a monitoring coping style (N = 123), those in the SCP care arm reported higher satisfaction with information provision (mean score: 73.9 vs 63.9, respectively; P = .04) and care (mean score: 74.5 vs 69.2, respectively; P = .03) compared with those in the usual care arm. Among patients who had a blunting coping style (N = 102), those in the SCP care arm reported a higher impact of the disease on life (mean score: 5.0 vs 4.5, respectively; P = .02) and a higher emotional impact of the disease (mean score: 5.4 vs 4.2, respectively; P = .01) compared with those in the usual care arm. CONCLUSIONS SCPs may be beneficial for patients who desire information about their disease, whereas SCPs may be less beneficial for patients who avoid medical information, suggesting a need for tailored SCP delivery to improve survivorship care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Belle H de Rooij
- Center of Research on Psychology in Somatic Diseases (CoRPS), Department of Medical and Clinical Psychology, Tilburg University, Tilburg, the Netherlands.,The Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Nicole P M Ezendam
- Center of Research on Psychology in Somatic Diseases (CoRPS), Department of Medical and Clinical Psychology, Tilburg University, Tilburg, the Netherlands.,The Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - M Caroline Vos
- Gynecologic Cancer Center South, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Elisabeth-TweeSteden Hospital, Tilburg and Waalwijk, the Netherlands
| | - Johanna M A Pijnenborg
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Dorry Boll
- Department of Gynecology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | - Roy F P M Kruitwagen
- Department of Gynecology and GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Lonneke V van de Poll-Franse
- Center of Research on Psychology in Somatic Diseases (CoRPS), Department of Medical and Clinical Psychology, Tilburg University, Tilburg, the Netherlands.,The Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization, Utrecht, the Netherlands.,Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Tevaarwerk AJ, Sesto ME. Continued Challenges to the Adoption and Implementation of Survivorship Care Plans. J Oncol Pract 2018; 14:573-576. [PMID: 30192692 PMCID: PMC6184078 DOI: 10.1200/jop.18.00378] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Amye J. Tevaarwerk
- University of Wisconsin; and University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center, Madison, WI
| | - Mary E. Sesto
- University of Wisconsin; and University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center, Madison, WI
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
de Rooij BH, Thomas TH, Post KE, Flanagan J, Ezendam NPM, Peppercorn J, Dizon DS. Survivorship care planning in gynecologic oncology-perspectives from patients, caregivers, and health care providers. J Cancer Surviv 2018; 12:762-774. [PMID: 30209681 PMCID: PMC6244937 DOI: 10.1007/s11764-018-0713-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2018] [Accepted: 08/28/2018] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
Purpose This qualitative study sought to describe the challenges following treatment and the preferences regarding survivorship care among patients treated for gynecological cancer, their caregivers, and health care providers. Methods Between July and August 2017, in-depth semi-structured interviews regarding survivorship were conducted at a large academic hospital in the USA among patients who recently completed treatment (< 12 months) for a gynecological cancer (ovarian, endometrial, cervical, and vulvar) and their primary caregivers. A focus group was conducted among health care providers (oncologists, nurses, and fellows). Main themes were identified using descriptive content analysis. Results A total of 30 individuals participated in this study (13 patients, 9 caregivers, 8 health care providers). Almost all participants reported a desire for more information on how to address survivorship needs, specifically as they related to side effects, follow-up schedule, and psychological assistance. Despite this uniformly identified need for more information, preferences for survivorship care planning differed across cancer types and individuals, with respect to content, timing, and mode of delivery. Health care providers expressed challenges in communicating with patients about survivorship, a desire to shift post-treatment conversations to the goal of improving quality of life as opposed to focusing on disease recurrence, and an unmet need for disease specific and individualized survivorship care planning. Conclusions Patients, caregivers, and health care providers each expressed a need for gynecologic cancer-tailored survivorship care resources. Implications for Cancer Survivors The variation of disease types and patient and caregiver needs may require multi-faceted, individualized survivorship care planning. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1007/s11764-018-0713-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Belle H de Rooij
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. .,CoRPS - Center of Research on Psychology in Somatic diseases, Department of Medical and Clinical Psychology, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands. .,The Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | | | - Kathryn E Post
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.,Boston College William F. Connell School of Nursing, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jane Flanagan
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.,Boston College William F. Connell School of Nursing, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Nicole P M Ezendam
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.,CoRPS - Center of Research on Psychology in Somatic diseases, Department of Medical and Clinical Psychology, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands
| | - Jeffrey Peppercorn
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Don S Dizon
- Lifespan Cancer Institute/Rhode Island Hospital, Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Tevaarwerk AJ, Klemp JR, van Londen GJ, Hesse BW, Sesto ME. Moving beyond static survivorship care plans: A systems engineering approach to population health management for cancer survivors. Cancer 2018; 124:4292-4300. [PMID: 30277575 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.31546] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2017] [Revised: 02/13/2018] [Accepted: 03/19/2018] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
The American cancer survivor population is ever-growing, with necessary follow-up primarily accomplished in a high-touch fashion-adding to unsustainability and fragmentation of care. Given the complexities of the health care system processes needed to support survivorship, engineering approaches may best address performance deficits and facilitate the provision of patient-centered care. Such collaboration between health care and engineering is recommended for redesigning health care delivery systems. By using Systems Engineering Initiative for Patient Safety (SEIPS), a systems engineering model widely used to improve health care quality and delivery, the authors examine the work system to identify the barriers and facilitators to necessary care in the presence of a survivorship care plan and visit. Recommendations for future improvement include ensuring that care-planning processes are dynamic, clearly assigned, resilient, and integrated with electronic health record systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amye J Tevaarwerk
- Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin, Madison and Carbone Cancer Center, Madison, Wisconsin
| | - Jennifer R Klemp
- Department of Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center and University of Kansas Cancer Center, Kansas City, Kansas
| | - Gijsberta J van Londen
- University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute and School/Department of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Bradford W Hesse
- Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Mary E Sesto
- Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin, Madison and Carbone Cancer Center, Madison, Wisconsin
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Birken SA, Clary AS, Bernstein S, Bolton J, Tardif-Douglin M, Mayer DK, Deal AM, Jacobs SR. Strategies for Successful Survivorship Care Plan Implementation: Results From a Qualitative Study. J Oncol Pract 2018; 14:e462-e483. [PMID: 30004824 DOI: 10.1200/jop.17.00054] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Care for US cancer survivors is often fragmented, contributing to poor health outcomes. Care and outcomes may improve when survivors and follow-up care providers receive survivorship care plans (SCPs), written documents containing information regarding cancer diagnosis, treatment, surveillance plans, and health promotion. However, implementing SCPs is challenging. As such, we sought to identify strategies for successfully implementing SCPs. METHODS We measured SCP implementation using performance data from cancer programs participating in the American Society of Clinical Oncology Quality Oncology Practice Initiative, an oncologist-led quality assessment and improvement program. We used semistructured interviews with cancer program employees (eg, physicians) to identify strategies for successfully implementing SCPs by comparing approaches in cancer programs that, according to Quality Oncology Practice Initiative performance indicators, developed and delivered SCPs to a relatively small proportion of eligible survivors and their follow-up care providers (ie, low performers; n = 6 participants in five programs) with approaches among programs with better performance (ie, moderate performers; n = 15 participants in nine programs). RESULTS Ten of 14 cancer programs developed SCPs for ≥ 50% of eligible survivors; two of 14 delivered SCPs to any survivors; and eight of 14 delivered SCPs to ≥ 25% of follow-up care providers. We found that moderate performers proactively addressed SCP requirements, leveraged requirements to improve survivorship care, set internal targets, automated implementation, had active leaders and champions, and tasked appropriate employees with SCP implementation. CONCLUSION SCP implementation remains challenging. We identified strategies for successfully implementing SCPs. Future research should examine how cancer programs have achieved these strategies; findings could contribute to an understanding of the changes needed to implement comprehensive survivorship care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah A Birken
- Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill; Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill; and RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC
| | - Alecia S Clary
- Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill; Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill; and RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC
| | - Shampa Bernstein
- Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill; Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill; and RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC
| | - Jamiyla Bolton
- Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill; Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill; and RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC
| | - Miriam Tardif-Douglin
- Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill; Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill; and RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC
| | - Deborah K Mayer
- Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill; Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill; and RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC
| | - Allison M Deal
- Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill; Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill; and RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC
| | - Sara R Jacobs
- Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill; Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill; and RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Jacobsen PB, DeRosa AP, Henderson TO, Mayer DK, Moskowitz CS, Paskett ED, Rowland JH. Systematic Review of the Impact of Cancer Survivorship Care Plans on Health Outcomes and Health Care Delivery. J Clin Oncol 2018; 36:2088-2100. [PMID: 29775389 PMCID: PMC6036622 DOI: 10.1200/jco.2018.77.7482] [Citation(s) in RCA: 138] [Impact Index Per Article: 23.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Numerous organizations recommend that patients with cancer receive a survivorship care plan (SCP) comprising a treatment summary and follow-up care plans. Among current barriers to implementation are providers' concerns about the strength of evidence that SCPs improve outcomes. This systematic review evaluates whether delivery of SCPs has a positive impact on health outcomes and health care delivery for cancer survivors. Methods Randomized and nonrandomized studies evaluating patient-reported outcomes, health care use, and disease outcomes after delivery of SCPs were identified by searching MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, and Cochrane Library. Data extracted by independent raters were summarized on the basis of qualitative synthesis. Results Eleven nonrandomized and 13 randomized studies met inclusion criteria. Variability was evident across studies in cancer types, SCP delivery timing and method, SCP recipients and content, SCP-related counseling, and outcomes assessed. Nonrandomized study findings yielded descriptive information on satisfaction with care and reactions to SCPs. Randomized study findings were generally negative for the most commonly assessed outcomes (ie, physical, functional, and psychological well-being); findings were positive in single studies for other outcomes, including amount of information received, satisfaction with care, and physician implementation of recommended care. Conclusion Existing research provides little evidence that SCPs improve health outcomes and health care delivery. Possible explanations include heterogeneity in study designs and the low likelihood that SCP delivery alone would influence distal outcomes. Findings are limited but more positive for proximal outcomes (eg, information received) and for care delivery, particularly when SCPs are accompanied by counseling to prepare survivors for future clinical encounters. Recommendations for future research include focusing to a greater extent on evaluating ways to ensure SCP recommendations are subsequently acted on as part of ongoing care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul B. Jacobsen
- Paul B. Jacobsen, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Antonio P. DeRosa, Weill Cornell Medicine; Chaya S. Moskowitz, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Tara O. Henderson, Pritzker School of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Deborah K. Mayer, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; Electra D. Paskett, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH; and Julia H. Rowland, Smith Center for Healing and the Arts, Washington, DC
| | - Antonio P. DeRosa
- Paul B. Jacobsen, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Antonio P. DeRosa, Weill Cornell Medicine; Chaya S. Moskowitz, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Tara O. Henderson, Pritzker School of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Deborah K. Mayer, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; Electra D. Paskett, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH; and Julia H. Rowland, Smith Center for Healing and the Arts, Washington, DC
| | - Tara O. Henderson
- Paul B. Jacobsen, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Antonio P. DeRosa, Weill Cornell Medicine; Chaya S. Moskowitz, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Tara O. Henderson, Pritzker School of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Deborah K. Mayer, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; Electra D. Paskett, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH; and Julia H. Rowland, Smith Center for Healing and the Arts, Washington, DC
| | - Deborah K. Mayer
- Paul B. Jacobsen, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Antonio P. DeRosa, Weill Cornell Medicine; Chaya S. Moskowitz, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Tara O. Henderson, Pritzker School of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Deborah K. Mayer, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; Electra D. Paskett, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH; and Julia H. Rowland, Smith Center for Healing and the Arts, Washington, DC
| | - Chaya S. Moskowitz
- Paul B. Jacobsen, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Antonio P. DeRosa, Weill Cornell Medicine; Chaya S. Moskowitz, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Tara O. Henderson, Pritzker School of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Deborah K. Mayer, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; Electra D. Paskett, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH; and Julia H. Rowland, Smith Center for Healing and the Arts, Washington, DC
| | - Electra D. Paskett
- Paul B. Jacobsen, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Antonio P. DeRosa, Weill Cornell Medicine; Chaya S. Moskowitz, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Tara O. Henderson, Pritzker School of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Deborah K. Mayer, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; Electra D. Paskett, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH; and Julia H. Rowland, Smith Center for Healing and the Arts, Washington, DC
| | - Julia H. Rowland
- Paul B. Jacobsen, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Antonio P. DeRosa, Weill Cornell Medicine; Chaya S. Moskowitz, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Tara O. Henderson, Pritzker School of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Deborah K. Mayer, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; Electra D. Paskett, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH; and Julia H. Rowland, Smith Center for Healing and the Arts, Washington, DC
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Grant S, Motala A, Chrystal JG, Shanman R, Zuchowski J, Zephyrin L, Cordasco KM. Describing care coordination of gynecologic oncology in western healthcare settings: a rapid review. Transl Behav Med 2018; 8:409-418. [DOI: 10.1093/tbm/ibx074] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Joya G Chrystal
- VA Center for The Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation and Policy (CSHIIP), North Hills, CA, USA
| | | | - Jessica Zuchowski
- VA Center for The Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation and Policy (CSHIIP), North Hills, CA, USA
| | - Laurie Zephyrin
- Women’s Health Services, Patient Care Services, Veterans Health Administration
- VA New York Harbor Healthcare System, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, New York University Langone School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Kristina M Cordasco
- VA Center for The Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation and Policy (CSHIIP), North Hills, CA, USA
- Department of Medicine, The University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
de Rooij BH, Park ER, Perez GK, Rabin J, Quain KM, Dizon DS, Post KE, Chinn GM, McDonough AL, Jimenez RB, van de Poll-Franse LV, Peppercorn J. Cluster Analysis Demonstrates the Need to Individualize Care for Cancer Survivors. Oncologist 2018; 23:1474-1481. [PMID: 29739897 DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2017-0558] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2017] [Accepted: 04/05/2018] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In efforts to inform clinical screening and development of survivorship care services, we sought to characterize patterns of health care needs among cancer survivors by (a) identifying and characterizing subgroups based on self-reported health care needs and (b) assessing sociodemographic, clinical, and psychosocial factors associated with these subgroups. METHODS We conducted a cross-sectional self-administered survey among patients presenting for routine follow-up care for early-stage cancer at our academic medical center. Latent class cluster analysis was used to identify clusters of survivors based on survivorship care needs within seven domains. Multiple logistic regression analyses were used to assess factors associated with these clusters. RESULTS Among 292 respondents, the highest unmet needs were related to the domains of side effects (53%), self-care (51%), and emotional coping (43%). Our analysis identified four clusters of survivors: (a) low needs (n = 123, 42%), (b) mainly physical needs (n = 46, 16%), (c) mainly psychological needs (n = 57, 20%), and (d) both physical and psychological needs (n = 66, 23%). Compared with cluster 1, those in clusters 2, 3, and 4 were younger (p < .03), those in clusters 3 and 4 had higher levels of psychological distress (p < .05), and those in clusters 2 and 4 reported higher levels of fatigue (p < .05). CONCLUSION Unmet needs among cancer survivors are prevalent; however, a substantial group of survivors report low or no health care needs. The wide variation in health care needs among cancer survivors suggests a need to screen all patients, followed by tailored interventions in clinical care delivery and research. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE The characterization of patients as having few needs, predominantly physical needs, predominantly psychological needs, or substantial needs that are both physical and psychological provides a productive framework for clinical care of cancer survivors and to guide further research in this field. Further research is needed to define the tailored information and services appropriate for each group of patients and to define optimal screening tools to efficiently identify the needs of individuals in oncology practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Belle H de Rooij
- Cancer Center, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Center of Research on Psychology in Somatic Diseases (CoRPS), Department of Medical and Clinical Psychology, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands
- The Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Elyse R Park
- Cancer Center, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Giselle K Perez
- Cancer Center, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Julia Rabin
- Cancer Center, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Katharine M Quain
- Cancer Center, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Don S Dizon
- Lifespan Cancer Institute, Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Kathryn E Post
- Cancer Center, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Garrett M Chinn
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Allison L McDonough
- Cancer Center, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Rachel B Jimenez
- Cancer Center, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Lonneke V van de Poll-Franse
- Center of Research on Psychology in Somatic Diseases (CoRPS), Department of Medical and Clinical Psychology, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands
- The Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jeffrey Peppercorn
- Cancer Center, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Spiegel DY, Koontz BF. Meeting the needs of long-term survivors: A testament to success in the care of patients with cancer. Cancer 2018; 124:2488-2490. [PMID: 29669188 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.31381] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2018] [Revised: 02/28/2018] [Accepted: 03/17/2018] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Daphna Y Spiegel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Bridget F Koontz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Birken SA, Urquhart R, Munoz-Plaza C, Zizzi AR, Haines E, Stover A, Mayer DK, Hahn EE. Survivorship care plans: are randomized controlled trials assessing outcomes that are relevant to stakeholders? J Cancer Surviv 2018; 12:495-508. [PMID: 29572602 DOI: 10.1007/s11764-018-0688-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2017] [Accepted: 03/09/2018] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to compare outcomes assessed in extant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to outcomes that stakeholders expect from survivorship care plans (SCPs). To facilitate the transition from active treatment to follow-up care for the 15.5 million US cancer survivors, many organizations require SCP use. However, results of several RCTs of SCPs' effectiveness have been null, possibly because they have evaluated outcomes on which SCPs should be expected to have limited influence. Stakeholders (e.g., survivors, oncologists) may expect outcomes that differ from RCTs' outcomes. METHODS We identified RCTs' outcomes using a PubMed literature review. We identified outcomes that stakeholders expect from SCPs using semistructured interviews with stakeholders in three healthcare systems in the USA and Canada. Finally, we mapped RCTs' outcomes onto stakeholder-identified outcomes. RESULTS RCT outcomes did not fully address outcomes that stakeholders expected from SCPs, and RCTs assessed outcomes that stakeholders did not expect from SCPs. RCTs often assessed outcomes only from survivors' perspectives. CONCLUSIONS RCTs of SCPs' effectiveness have not assessed outcomes that stakeholders expect. To better understand SCPs' effectiveness, future RCTs should assess outcomes of SCP use that are relevant from the perspective of multiple stakeholders. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS SCPs' effectiveness may be optimized when used with an eye toward outcomes that stakeholders expect from SCPs. For survivors, this means using SCPs as a map to guide them with respect to what kind of follow-up care they should seek, when they should seek it, and from whom they should seek it.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah A Birken
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 1103E McGavran-Greenberg Hall, 135 Dauer Dr., Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA.
| | - Robin Urquhart
- Department of Surgery, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada
| | - Corrine Munoz-Plaza
- Department of Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Research, Pasadena, CA, USA
| | - Alexandra R Zizzi
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 1103E McGavran-Greenberg Hall, 135 Dauer Dr., Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA
| | - Emily Haines
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 1103E McGavran-Greenberg Hall, 135 Dauer Dr., Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA
| | - Angela Stover
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 1103E McGavran-Greenberg Hall, 135 Dauer Dr., Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA
| | - Deborah K Mayer
- School of Nursing, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, The University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Erin E Hahn
- Department of Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Research, Pasadena, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Giese-Davis J, Sisler J, Zhong L, Brandelli Y, McCormick JL, Railton C, Shirt L, Lau H, Hao D, Chobanuk J, Walley B, Joy AA, Taylor A, Carlson L. Alberta CancerBridges development of a care plan evaluation measure. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2018; 25:e59-e72. [PMID: 29507497 DOI: 10.3747/co.25.3766] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
Background No standardized measures specifically assess cancer survivors' and healthcare providers' experience of Survivor Care Plans (scps). We sought to develop two care plan evaluation (cpe) measures, one for survivors (cpe-s) and one for healthcare providers (cpe-p), examine initial psychometric qualities in Alberta, and assess generalizability in Manitoba, Canada. Methods We developed the initial measures using convenience samples of breast (n = 35) and head and neck (n = 18) survivors who received scps at the end of active cancer-centre treatment. After assessing Alberta's scp concordance with Institute of Medicine (iom) recommendations using a published coding scheme, we examined psychometric qualities for the cpe-s and cpe-p. We examined generalizability in Manitoba, Canada, with colorectal survivors discharged to primary care providers for follow-up (n = 75). Results We demonstrated acceptable internal consistency for the cpe-s and cpe-p subscales and total score after eliminating one item per subscale for cpe-s, two for cpe-p, resulting in revised scales with four 7-item and 6-item subscales, respectively. Subscale scores correlated highly indicating that for each measure the total score may be the most reliable and valid. We provide initial cpe-s discriminant, convergent, and predictive validity using the total score. Using the Manitoba sample, initial psychometrics similarly indicated good generalizability across differences in tumour groups, scp, and location. Conclusions We recommend the revised cpe-s and cpe-p for further use and development. Studies documenting the creation and standardization of scp evaluations are few, and we recommend further development of patient experience measures to improve both clinical practice and the specificity of research questions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Giese-Davis
- Department of Oncology, Division of Psychosocial Oncology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta.,Psychosocial Resources, Tom Baker Cancer Center, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Alberta
| | - J Sisler
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba
| | - L Zhong
- Department of Oncology, Division of Psychosocial Oncology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta.,Psychosocial Resources, Tom Baker Cancer Center, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Alberta
| | - Y Brandelli
- Department of Oncology, Division of Psychosocial Oncology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta.,Psychosocial Resources, Tom Baker Cancer Center, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Alberta
| | - J L McCormick
- Department of Oncology, Division of Psychosocial Oncology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta.,Psychosocial Resources, Tom Baker Cancer Center, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Alberta
| | - C Railton
- Department of Oncology, University of Calgary, Tom Baker Cancer Centre, Calgary, Alberta
| | - L Shirt
- Palliative Consult Service-Calgary Zone Urban, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Alberta
| | - H Lau
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Head and Neck Tumour Group, Tom Baker Cancer Center, Calgary
| | - D Hao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Head and Neck Tumour Group, Tom Baker Cancer Center, Calgary
| | - J Chobanuk
- Department of Oncology, University of Calgary, Tom Baker Cancer Centre, Calgary, Alberta
| | - B Walley
- Comprehensive Breast Care Program (cbcp), Community Oncology, Alberta Health Services-Cancer Care, Edmonton, Alberta
| | - A A Joy
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Oncology, University of Alberta, Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, Alberta; and
| | - A Taylor
- Department of Oncology, University of Calgary, Tom Baker Cancer Centre, Calgary, Alberta.,Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Oncology, University of Alberta, Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, Alberta; and
| | - L Carlson
- Department of Oncology, Division of Psychosocial Oncology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta.,Psychosocial Resources, Tom Baker Cancer Center, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Alberta
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Survivorship care plans have a negative impact on long-term quality of life and anxiety through more threatening illness perceptions in gynecological cancer patients: the ROGY care trial. Qual Life Res 2018; 27:1533-1544. [PMID: 29511906 PMCID: PMC5951872 DOI: 10.1007/s11136-018-1825-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/27/2018] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Purpose Prior results from the registration system oncological gynecology (ROGY) care trial showed that survivorship care plans (SCPs) increased threatening illness perceptions in gynecological cancer survivors, but it remained unclear whether this would result in poorer physical and psychosocial outcomes. The aim of the current study is to assess the direct and indirect effects of SCPs on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and anxiety and depression, through illness perceptions. Methods Twelve hospitals in the South of the Netherlands were randomized to providing ‘SCP care’ or ‘usual care.’ Newly diagnosed endometrial and ovarian cancer patients completed questionnaires after initial treatment (endometrial, 221 [75%]; ovarian, 174 [71%]) and after 6, 12, and 24 months. SCPs were automatically generated after initial treatment by the oncology providers through the web-based ROGY. Illness perceptions were measured after initial treatment and HRQoL and anxiety and depression after 6, 12, and 24 months. Results Structural equation models showed that endometrial cancer patients who experienced more symptoms or concern due to the SCP reported worse social functioning (β = − 0.82; p = 0.01) and more fatigue, insomnia, pain, and anxiety (β = 0.58–0.86, p < 0.05) within 12 months after treatment. Ovarian cancer patients who had lower trust that the treatment would cure their disease due to the SCP reported worse emotional functioning 6 months after treatment (β = 0.27, p = 0.02). Conclusions Current results show that SCPs may have negative effects on HRQoL and anxiety in patients who experience more threatening illness perceptions due to the SCP. We should be aware of the potential negative consequences of SCPs. Trial Registration clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01185626.
Collapse
|
40
|
Hebdon M, Abrahamson K, Griggs R, McComb S. Shared mental models of cancer survivorship care. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 2018; 27:e12831. [PMID: 29419945 DOI: 10.1111/ecc.12831] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/09/2018] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- M.C. Hebdon
- Radford University School of Nursing; Radford VA USA
| | - K. Abrahamson
- Purdue University School of Nursing; West Lafayette IN USA
| | - R.R. Griggs
- Purdue University School of Nursing; West Lafayette IN USA
| | - S.A. McComb
- Purdue University Schools of Nursing and Industrial Engineering; West Lafayette IN USA
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Sakai H, Katsumata N, Takahashi M. Providing written information increases patient satisfaction: a web-based questionnaire survey of Japanese cancer survivors. Jpn J Clin Oncol 2017; 47:611-617. [PMID: 28369566 DOI: 10.1093/jjco/hyx043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2016] [Accepted: 03/08/2017] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose The Institute of Medicine (IOM) of the United States recommends that all cancer survivors be provided with a survivorship care plan (SCP), which includes a patient treatment summary and a follow-up care plan. However, SCPs have not been widely adopted in Japan. To provide basic data necessary for implementing SCPs in Japan, we aimed to investigate the forms of clinical and survivorship-related information that Japanese cancer survivors receive from their healthcare providers, and to examine whether written information increases their satisfaction. Methods We performed a cross-sectional online survey of cancer survivors who underwent acute cancer treatment and had at least one follow-up with a physician in the past year. Cancer survivors provided the elements and forms (verbally and/or written) of information they received, as well as the degree of satisfaction with the information provided. Results Responses were obtained from 545 cancer survivors. Information elements such as surgical procedure (98.3%), surgical outcome (98.1%), and names of administered chemotherapy agents (97.8%) were commonly provided, whereas mental care resources and providers (29.7%), effects on marital relationship and sexual health (35.7%), and effects on fertility (43.4%) were less common. A large proportion of cancer survivors received verbal information only. For 18 of 20 elements, except for effects on fertility and duration of hormonal therapy, satisfaction was significantly higher when both forms of information were provided (P < 0.05). Conclusions Providing written and verbal explanations of clinical and survivorship-related information can better meet the needs of Japanese cancer survivors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hitomi Sakai
- Department of Medical Oncology, Nippon Medical School Musashikosugi Hospital
| | - Noriyuki Katsumata
- Department of Medical Oncology, Nippon Medical School Musashikosugi Hospital
| | - Miyako Takahashi
- Division of Cancer Survivorship Research, Center for Cancer Control and Information Services, National Cancer Center, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Abstract
Introduction There has been a growing emphasis on the use of integrated care plans to deliver cancer care. However little is known about how integrated care plans for cancer patients are developed including featured core activities, facilitators for uptake and indicators for assessing impact. Methods Given limited consensus around what constitutes an integrated care plan for cancer patients, a scoping review was conducted to explore the components of integrated care plans and contextual factors that influence design and uptake. Results Five types of integrated care plans based on the stage of cancer care: surgical, systemic, survivorship, palliative and comprehensive (involving a transition between stages) are described in current literature. Breast, esophageal and colorectal cancers were common disease sites. Multi-disciplinary teams, patient needs assessment and transitional planning emerged as key features. Provider buy-in and training alongside informational technology support served as important facilitators for plan uptake. Provider-level measurement was considerably less robust compared to patient and system-level indicators. Conclusions Similarities in design features, components and facilitators across the various types of integrated care plans indicates opportunities to leverage shared features and enable a management lens that spans the trajectory of a patient's journey rather than a phase-specific silo approach to care.
Collapse
|
43
|
Jeppesen MM, Ezendam NPM, Pijnenborg JMA, Caroline Vos M, Boll D, Kruitwagen RFPM, Jensen PT, van de Poll-Franse LV. The impact of the survivorship care plan on health care use: 2-year follow-up results of the ROGY care trial. J Cancer Surviv 2017; 12:18-27. [DOI: 10.1007/s11764-017-0639-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2017] [Accepted: 08/15/2017] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|
44
|
Hébert J, Fillion L. Assessment of the feasibility and acceptability, and pre-test of the utility of an individualized survivorship care plan (ISCP) for women with endometrial cancers during the transition of the end of active treatment to cancer survivorship. Can Oncol Nurs J 2017; 27:153-163. [PMID: 31148628 PMCID: PMC6516223 DOI: 10.5737/23688076272153163] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
The transition from the end of active treatment to survivorship holds many challenges for women with endometrial cancer (WEC) and for the organization of health services. The feasibility and acceptability of implementing an individualized survivorship care plan (ISCP) at the end of treatment are documented as potential solutions. The utility of an ISCP on three indicators (SUNS, FCRI, and HeiQ) was pre-tested by comparing two groups of WEC (control and exposed to the ISCP). The WEC exposed to the ISCP had fewer needs, a lesser intensity of fear of cancer recurrence, and better health-related empowerment skills three months after the end of treatment, as compared to the control group. Obstacles of time, resources, and organization were raised. BACKGROUND The transition from the end of active treatment to cancer survivorship is a time of imbalance and turbulence for women with endometrial cancer (WEC). The transition to survivorship continues to be uncoordinated and the need for information about the side effects to watch for and the health risks is unmet. The implementation of an individualized survivorship care plan (ISCP) is suggested as an information and communication tool that could be a solution for facilitating the transition from the end of treatment to the beginning of survivorship. RESEARCH OBJECTIVE AND METHOD To assess and document the feasibility and acceptability of implementing an ISCP, qualitative data were gathered from WEC, oncology nurse navigators (ONN), and family doctors. A pre-experimental research design with a non-equivalent control group, an end of treatment (T0), and a three-month follow-up (T1) allowed us to pre-test its utility according to three indicators: (1) overall needs (SUNS); (2) fear of cancer recurrence (FCRI); and (3) empowerment (HeiQ) according to exposure to ISCP (control versus exposed) and to the time of measurement in the transition period (T0 versus T1). RESULTS The sample was made up of 18 WEC for the group exposed to the ISCP and 13 WEC for the control group, 12 general practitioners, and two ONN. After ONN training, the ISCP completion time varied between 60 and 75 minutes, and the meeting for providing the ISCP lasted 45-60 minutes. The WEC supported the idea that meetings with the ONN and the ISCP were useful in meeting their needs for information and support. The family doctors supported its relevancy in favouring follow-up and better subsequent healthcare management, as well as in reassuring patients and avoiding a sense of abandonment at the end of treatment. Comparing the group exposed to the ISCP versus the control group, fewer reported needs can be observed: information: 35% versus 74%, p = .030; professional and financial: 6% versus 19%, p = .057; access and continuity: 9% versus 25%, p = .078; support: 18% versus 50%, p = .007, emotional: 13% versus 28%, p = .044). Moreover, at T1, empowerment according to the skill and technique acquisition sub-scale shows a higher trend (M = 75.00 (10.21) versus M = 64.06 (10.67), p = .097). The level of fear of recurrence remains above the clinically significant score of 13 for both groups at the two times of measurement. DISCUSSION The ISCP is an informational tool that seeks to facilitate care-related communication and coordination between specialized and primary care. It is intended to facilitate the transition from the end of treatment to survivorship and survivors' commitment to health-related empowerment behaviours. The feasibility and utility of implementing an ISCP are supported if additional professional, organizational, and financial resources are specified and mobilized.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johanne Hébert
- Professor, Department of Nursing, Université du Québec à Rimouski (UQAR)
| | - Lise Fillion
- Full professor, Faculty of Nursing, Université Laval
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Hébert J, Fillion L. Évaluation de la faisabilité, de l’acceptabilité et pré-test de l’utilité d’un plan de soins de suivi (PSS) auprès de femmes atteintes du cancer de l’endomètre lors de la transition de la fin du traitement actif vers la survie au cancer. Can Oncol Nurs J 2017; 27:142-152. [PMID: 31148643 PMCID: PMC6516233 DOI: 10.5737/23688076272142152] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
La transition de la fin des traitements vers la survie représente de nombreux défis pour les femmes atteintes du cancer de l’endomètre (FACE) et pour l’organisation des services de santé. La faisabilité et l’acceptabilité d’implanter un plan de soins de suivi (PSS) à la fin du traitement sont documentées comme pistes de solution. L’utilité du PSS sur trois indicateurs (SUNS, IPRC et HeiQ) est pré-testée en comparant deux groupes de FACE (exposé ou non au PSS). Les FACE exposées au PSS ont moins de besoins, une intensité inférieure de peur de récidive du cancer et de meilleurs comportements d’autogestion de santé trois mois après la fin du traitement comparativement au groupe non exposé. Des barrières de temps, de ressources et d’organisation sont soulevées.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johanne Hébert
- Professeure, Département des sciences infirmières, Université du Québec à Rimouski, UQA
| | - Lise Fillion
- Professeure titulaire, Faculté des sciences infirmières, Université Laval
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
de Rooij BH, Ezendam NP, Nicolaije KA, Caroline Vos M, Pijnenborg JM, Boll D, Boss EA, Hermans RH, Engelhart KC, Haartsen JE, Pijlman BM, van Loon-Baelemans IE, Mertens HJ, Nolting WE, van Beek JJ, Roukema JA, Kruitwagen RF, van de Poll-Franse LV. Effects of Survivorship Care Plans on patient reported outcomes in ovarian cancer during 2-year follow-up – The ROGY care trial. Gynecol Oncol 2017; 145:319-328. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2017.02.041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2016] [Revised: 01/30/2017] [Accepted: 02/27/2017] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
|
47
|
Maly RC, Liang LJ, Liu Y, Griggs JJ, Ganz PA. Randomized Controlled Trial of Survivorship Care Plans Among Low-Income, Predominantly Latina Breast Cancer Survivors. J Clin Oncol 2017; 35:1814-1821. [PMID: 28418767 DOI: 10.1200/jco.2016.68.9497] [Citation(s) in RCA: 57] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of a randomized controlled trial (RCT) of treatment summaries and survivorship care plans coupled with a nurse counseling session, primarily on physician implementation of and secondarily on patient adherence to recommended survivorship care, among a low-income population of breast cancer survivors (survivors). Methods We recruited 212 low-income, predominantly Latina (72.6%) survivors with stage 0 to III breast cancer, with an average age of 53 years, from two Los Angeles County public hospitals into an RCT of a survivorship care nurse counseling session coupled with the provision of individualized treatment summaries and survivorship care plans to patients and their health care providers from December 2012 to July 2014. One hundred seven survivors received the experimental intervention, and 105 survivors received usual care. Multiple linear regression analyses were performed to assess intervention effects on physician implementation of and patient adherence to recommended survivorship care. Scales that served as covariables were Knowledge of Survivorship Issues, Perceived Efficacy in Patient-Physician Interactions, and Satisfaction With Care and Information. Results Survivors in the intervention group reported greater physician implementation of recommended breast cancer survivorship care, for example, treatment of depression or hot flashes, than did those in the control group (adjusted difference, 16 ± 5.3; P = .003). Baseline Satisfaction With Care and Information was positively associated with physician implementation (coefficient, 5.2 ± 2.2; P = .02). Being married/partnered (-11.8 ± 4.0; P = .004) and age (-0.5 ± 0.2; P = .028) were negatively associated with patient adherence. Conclusion To our knowledge, this is the first RCT of survivorship care plans to show benefits in clinical outcomes, in this case, showing increased physician implementation of recommended breast cancer survivorship care in the intervention group, compared with the control group.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rose C Maly
- Rose C. Maly, Li-Jung Liang, and Patricia A. Ganz, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California at Los Angeles; Patricia A. Ganz, University of California at Los Angeles, Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center; Patricia A. Ganz, University of California at Los Angeles, Fielding School of Public Health, Los Angeles; Yihang Liu, UnitedHealth Group, Cypress, CA; Jennifer J. Griggs, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Li-Jung Liang
- Rose C. Maly, Li-Jung Liang, and Patricia A. Ganz, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California at Los Angeles; Patricia A. Ganz, University of California at Los Angeles, Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center; Patricia A. Ganz, University of California at Los Angeles, Fielding School of Public Health, Los Angeles; Yihang Liu, UnitedHealth Group, Cypress, CA; Jennifer J. Griggs, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Yihang Liu
- Rose C. Maly, Li-Jung Liang, and Patricia A. Ganz, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California at Los Angeles; Patricia A. Ganz, University of California at Los Angeles, Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center; Patricia A. Ganz, University of California at Los Angeles, Fielding School of Public Health, Los Angeles; Yihang Liu, UnitedHealth Group, Cypress, CA; Jennifer J. Griggs, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Jennifer J Griggs
- Rose C. Maly, Li-Jung Liang, and Patricia A. Ganz, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California at Los Angeles; Patricia A. Ganz, University of California at Los Angeles, Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center; Patricia A. Ganz, University of California at Los Angeles, Fielding School of Public Health, Los Angeles; Yihang Liu, UnitedHealth Group, Cypress, CA; Jennifer J. Griggs, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Patricia A Ganz
- Rose C. Maly, Li-Jung Liang, and Patricia A. Ganz, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California at Los Angeles; Patricia A. Ganz, University of California at Los Angeles, Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center; Patricia A. Ganz, University of California at Los Angeles, Fielding School of Public Health, Los Angeles; Yihang Liu, UnitedHealth Group, Cypress, CA; Jennifer J. Griggs, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
van de Poll-Franse LV, Nicolaije KAH, Ezendam NPM. The impact of cancer survivorship care plans on patient and health care provider outcomes: a current perspective. Acta Oncol 2017; 56:134-138. [PMID: 28084140 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2016.1266080] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND To help the growing number of cancer survivors deal with the challenges of cancer survivorship, survivorship care plans (SCPs) were recommended by the Institute of Medicine (IOM) in 2006. The SCP is a formal document that contains both a tailored treatment summary and a follow-up care plan. Since the IOM recommendation 10 years ago, the implementation in daily clinical practice is minimal. Several studies have investigated the effects of SCPs on patient-reported outcomes and oncology and primary care providers (PCPs), but the quantity and quality of these studies are limited. RESULTS The first four randomized trials comparing SCP delivery with usual care failed to show a positive effect on satisfaction with information provision, satisfaction with care, distress or quality of life. SCPs did improve the amount of information provided and communication of PCPs with medical specialists and patients. A recent small trial that changed the focus from SCP as primarily an information delivery intervention to a behavioral intervention did observe positive effects on self-reported health, lower social role limitations and a trend towards greater self-efficacy. Gaps in knowledge about SCPs include uncertainty about content and length of the SCP; whether it should be delivered online or on paper; the timing and frequency of delivery; which health care provide should deliver SCP care. Finally, cost-effectiveness of SCP interventions has received limited attention. CONCLUSION Currently, there is not enough evidence to warrant large-scale implementation of SCPs, or to abandon SCPs altogether. Emphasis on the SCP process and survivor engagement, supporting self-management may be an important way forward in SCP delivery. Whether this is beneficial and cost-effective on the long term and among different groups of cancer survivors needs further investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lonneke V. van de Poll-Franse
- Department of Medical and Clinical Psychology, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands
- Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, The Netherlands
| | - Kim A. H. Nicolaije
- Department of Medical and Clinical Psychology, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands
- Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Nicole P. M. Ezendam
- Department of Medical and Clinical Psychology, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands
- Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Hébert J, Fillion L. Development and validation of an individualized survivorship care plan (ISCP) for women with endometrial cancer during the transition of the end of active treatment to the cancer survivorship. Can Oncol Nurs J 2017; 27:33-42. [PMID: 31148653 DOI: 10.5737/236880762713342] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Many cancer survivors finish their treatment without knowing the associated health risks and few are prepared to handle their health needs in the survivorship phase. Moreover, practical guides for follow- up care are not available and survivors' psychological and social needs often go unassessed. In this article, we propose the development and implementation of an individualized follow-up care plan (IFCP) after active treatment for women with endometrial cancers (WEC) to meet their needs for information and to facilitate the transition to the survivorship phase. Background The after-treatment phase is a distinct phase that is still neglected in the oncological continuum of care. It is the transition between two phases in the care trajectory-treatment and survivorship-that gives rise to many challenges for survivors, care providers and the healthcare system alike. Research goal Aiming to facilitate the transition between the end of active treatment and the cancer survivorship phases, we pursued two objectives: 1) Develop an individualized follow-up care plan (IFCP) based on both the literature and the perspective of WEC, healthcare professionals involved with the target clientele and oncology outreach managers, and 2) Have this IFCP validated by an interdisciplinary team. Methodology For the first objective, WEC-related needs at the end of active treatment (immediate end, three months and six months), as well as the perceptions of health professionals and oncology outreach managers were gathered by interview and group discussion on the benefit of an IFCP, its content and desired format. A content analysis of the interview data was performed using the Miles and Huberman approach (2003). For the second objective, an iterative consultation process with health professionals allowed for validation by consensus. These two objectives are the first qualitative phase of a mixed-methods sequential exploratory design that will make the development of an IFCP possible. In the second phase, we conducted a feasibility study of the implementation of the IFCP during the end of active treatment transition to cancer survivorship transition. This will be the subject of a second article. Results The interviews (n=47) revealed WECs' lack of preparation for the transition from the end of active treatment to the cancer survivorship. The following needs were specified: information (80%), emotional support, particularly to overcome their fear of recurrence (75%), the management of physical symptoms (45%), and support for adapting to change (45%). The data gathered from healthcare professionals and outreach managers support the utility of an IFCP in meeting these needs. The iterative validation process by the interdisciplinary team made consensus on the format and content possible. The final version of the IFCP is seen as a tool for information and communication in the survivorship phase. Some obstacles to its transfer to clinical practice are reported. Conclusion This study presents the entire process that led to the development of an IFCP that integrates both the needs of endometrial cancer survivors and the opinions of healthcare professionals and the oncology outreach managers organizing this care. Indications on how the IFCP could be implemented within this organization are also formulated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johanne Hébert
- Professor, Department of Nursing, Université du Québec à Rimouski (UQAR)
| | - Lise Fillion
- Full professor, Faculty of Nursing, Université Laval
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Spears J, Craft M, White S. Outcomes of Cancer Survivorship Care Provided by Advanced Practice RNs Compared to Other Models of Care: A Systematic Review. Oncol Nurs Forum 2017; 44:E34-E41. [DOI: 10.1188/17.onf.e34-e41] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
|