Survivorship planning in gynecologic cancer patients

Concurrent Surgery for Locoregional Gynecologic Cancers and Pelvic Floor Disorders in a Population of Patients With Medicare Insurance

OBJECTIVE

To estimate the rate of concurrent surgery for locoregional gynecologic cancer and pelvic organ prolapse-urinary incontinence (POP-UI) and to assess the rate of surgery for POP-UI within 5 years for those who did not undergo concurrent surgery.

METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort study. The SEER-Medicare data set was used to identify cases of local or regional endometrial, cervical, and ovarian cancer diagnosed from 2000 to 2017. Patients were followed up for 5 years from diagnosis. We used χ 2 tests to identify categorical variables associated with having a concurrent POP-UI procedure with hysterectomy or within 5 years of hysterectomy. Logistic regression was used to calculate odds ratios and 95% CIs adjusted for variables statistically significant (α=.05) in the univariate analyses.

RESULTS

Of 30,862 patients with locoregional gynecologic cancer, only 5.5% underwent concurrent POP-UI surgery. Of those with a preexisting diagnosis related to POP-UI, however, 21.1% had concurrent surgery. Of the patients who had a diagnosis of POP-UI at the time of initial surgery for cancer and who did not undergo concurrent surgery, an additional 5.5% had a second surgery for POP-UI within 5 years. The rate of concurrent surgery remained constant over the time period (5.7% in 2000 and 2017) despite an increase in the frequency of POP-UI diagnosis in the same time frame.

CONCLUSION

The rate of concurrent surgery for patients with an early-stage gynecologic cancer and POP-UI-associated diagnosis in women older than age 65 years was 21.1%. Of women who did not undergo concurrent surgery but had a diagnosis of POP-UI, 1 in 18 underwent surgery for POP-UI within 5 years of their index cancer surgery. Dedicated efforts must be made to identify patients who would most benefit from concurrent cancer and POP-UI surgery in those with locoregional gynecologic cancers and pelvic floor disorders.

Conditional estimates for uterine serous cancer: Tools for survivorship counseling and planning

OBJECTIVES

Develop conditional survival and risk-assessment estimates for uterine serous carcinoma (USC) overall and stratified by stage as tools for annual survivorship counseling and care planning.

METHODS

Patients in the National Cancer Data Base diagnosed between 2004 and 2014 with stage I-IV USC were eligible. Individuals missing stage or survival data or with multiple malignancies were excluded. Five-year conditional survival was estimated using the stage-stratified Kaplan-Meier method annually during follow-up. A standardized mortality ratio (SMR) estimated the proportion of observed to expected deaths in the U.S. adjusted for year, age, and race. The relationships between prognostic factors and survival were studied using multivariate Cox modeling at diagnosis and conditioned on surviving 5-years.

RESULTS

There were 14,575 participants, including 43% with stage I, 8% with stage II, 29% with stage III, and 20% with stage IV USC. Five-year survival at diagnosis vs. after surviving 5-years was 52% vs. 75% overall, 77% vs. 81% for stage I, 57% vs. 72% for stage II, 40% vs. 66% for stage III, and 17% vs. 60% for stage IV USC, respectively (P < 0.0001). Incremental improvements in 5-year conditional survival and reductions in SMR tracked with annual follow-up and higher stage. The adjusted risk of death at diagnosis vs. after surviving 5-years was 1.15 vs. 1.40 per 5-year increase of age, 1.26 vs. 1.68 for Medicaid insurance, 3.92 vs. 2.48 for stage III disease, and 6.65 vs. 2.79 for stage IV disease, respectively (P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

In USC, the evolution of conditional survival permits annual reassessments of prognosis to tailor survivorship counseling and care planning.

GCIG-Consensus guideline for Long-term survivorship in gynecologic Cancer: A position paper from the gynecologic cancer Intergroup (GCIG) symptom benefit committee

INTRODUCTION

Long-term survivors of gynecological cancers may be cured but still have ongoing health concerns and long-term side effects following cancer treatment. The aim of this brainstorming meeting was to develop recommendations for long-term follow-up for survivors from gynecologic cancer.

METHODS

International experts, representing each member group within the Gynecologic Cancer InterGroup (GCIG), met to define long-term survival, propose guidelines for long term follow-up and propose ways to implement long term survivorship follow-up in clinical trials involving gynecological cancers.

RESULTS

Long-term survival with/from gynecological cancers was defined as survival of at least five years from diagnosis, irrespective of disease recurrences. Review of the literature showed that more than 50% of cancer survivors with gynecological cancer still experienced health concerns/long-term side effects. Main side effects included neurologic symptoms, sleep disturbance, fatigue, sexual dysfunction, bowel and urinary problems and lymphedema. In this article, long-term side effects are discussed in detail and treatment options are proposed. Screening for second primary cancers and lifestyle counselling (nutrition, physical activity, mental health) may improve quality of life and overall health status, as well as prevent cardiovascular events. Clinical trials should address cancer survivorship and report patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) for cancer survivors.

CONCLUSION

Long-term survivors after gynecological cancer have unique longer term challenges that need to be addressed systematically by care givers. Follow-up after completing treatment for primary gynecological cancer should be offered lifelong. Survivorship care plans may help to summarize cancer history, long-term side effects and to give information on health promotion and prevention.

Long-term quality of life outcomes of women treated for early-stage endometrial cancer

OBJECTIVE

To compare long-term quality of life in women treated for early-stage endometrial cancer with population norms, and to compare quality of life outcomes of patients who had total laparoscopic or total abdominal hysterectomy.

METHODS

Once the last enrolled patient had completed 4.5 years of follow-up after surgery, participants in the Laparoscopic Approach to Cancer of the Endometrium (LACE) clinical trial were asked to complete a self-administered questionnaire. Two instruments-EuroQol 5 Dimension 3-level (EQ-5D-3L) and the Functional Assessment of Cancer Treatment-General Population (FACT-GP)-were used to determine quality of life. The mean computed EQ-5D-3L index scores for LACE participants at different age categories were compared with Australian normative scores; and the FACT-GP scores were compared between patients treated with surgical treatments.

RESULTS

Of 760 women originally enrolled in the LACE trial, 259 (50.2%) of 516 women consented to provide long-term follow-up data at a median of 9 years (range 6-12) after surgery. On the EQ-5D-3L, long-term endometrial cancer survivors reported higher prevalence of anxiety/depression than normative levels across all age groups (55-64 years, 30% vs 14.9%; 65-74 years, 30.1% vs 15.8%; ≥75 years, 25.9% vs 10.7%). For women ≥75 years of age, the prevalence of impairment in mobility (57.6% vs 43.3%) and usual activities (58.8% vs 37.9%) was also higher than for population norms. For the FACT-GP, the physical (effect size: -0.28, p<0.028) and functional (effect size: -0.30, p<0.015) well-being sub-scale favored the total laparoscopic hysterectomy compared with total abdominal hysterectomy recipients.

CONCLUSION

Compared with population-based norms, long-term endometrial cancer survivors reported higher prevalence of anxiety/depression across all age groups, and deficits in mobility and usual activities for women aged ≥75 years. Physical and functional well-being were better among women who were treated with total laparoscopic hysterectomy than among those receiving total abdominal hysterectomy.

Bone health and osteoporosis screening in gynecologic cancer survivors

Cancer treatment-induced bone loss is a known side effect of cancer therapy that increases the risk of osteoporosis and bone fracture. Women with gynecologic cancer are at increased risk of bone loss secondary to the combined effect of oophorectomy and adjuvant therapies. Data regarding bone loss in women with gynecologic cancers are overall lacking compared to other cancer populations. Consequently, guidelines for osteoporosis screening in women with cancer are largely based on data generated among non-gynecologic cancer survivors. This article reviews current available data of bone health in women with gynecologic cancer, summarizes best-available guidelines for screening for osteoporosis in women with cancer, and provides guidance for osteoporosis screening in women with gynecologic cancers based on best available evidence.

A Systematic Review: Dietary Habits of Women with Gynecological Cancer before, during and after Treatment

INTRODUCTION

Cancer treatment can affect eating habits and some patients treated with pelvic radiotherapy develop chronic changes in their bowel function which may impact on dietary intake. This systematic review summarizes current research on dietary habits before, during and after treatment in women with a gynecological malignancy.

METHODS

MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and PubMed databases were searched until August 1, 2019, with no language restrictions. PRISMA guidelines for systematic reviews were used to ensure transparent and complete reporting (Liberati et al., 2009). Quantitative studies exploring dietary habits before, during or after treatment for gynecological cancer were included.

RESULTS

Three prospective cohort studies (98 participants) were included. All patients were treated with radiotherapy; some also had surgery and chemotherapy. Studies reported similar changes in weight, BMI and energy intake and found that patients lose weight during treatment, but this was not long-lasting. Long-term results suggest that fat and protein intake increase significantly (p < 0.01). There was no correlation of symptoms with any nutritional parameters.

CONCLUSION

Evidence from three studies suggests further studies including long-term assessment of dietary intake in women treated for a gynecological malignancy are warranted to explore the impact of cancer treatments on dietary intake and its relation to developing long-term gastrointestinal toxicity.

Bowel dysfunction in survivors of gynaecologic malignancies

PURPOSE

To assess the prevalence of bowel dysfunctions after treatment for gynaecological cancer and the impact on the quality of life.

METHODS

We identified a cohort of 217 eligible women treated with radiotherapy (RT) with curative intention, alone or as combined treatment, for gynaecological malignancies at three institutions in Catalonia (Spain). Demographic, diagnosis and treatment modality were reviewed. Patients were sent validated questionnaires to assess bowel function and a set of questions asking on the changes after RT in bowel function, urinary function, sexuality, pain and lymphoedema.

RESULTS

Questionnaires were returned by 109 patients (50.2%) with a mean age of 65 ± 11 years. Of them, 71.8% had been treated for endometrial cancer and 28.2% for cervical cancer. Overall, 42.7% of patients reported bowel dysfunction, affecting their quality of life in 36% of cases. Symptoms were more frequent in patients who had undergone external beam RT compared to brachytherapy. The most common symptom was defecatory urgency which was reported by more than 40% of patients according to the St Mark's score, although it was less common in other questionnaires. Overall, faecal incontinence ranged between 10 and 15%, and usual loose stools and diarrhoea were reported by 13.5% and 5.1%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Prevalence of bowel symptoms after treatment of gynaecological malignancies is high. A systematic evaluation using validated questionnaires should be performed in order to allow the decision-making process and also because there are a number of treatments available to improve the quality of life of cancer survivors.

A proposed tailored investigational algorithm for women treated for gynaecological cancer with long-term gastrointestinal consequences

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Long-term changes in gastrointestinal function impacting quality of life after treatment for cancer are common. Peer reviewed guidance to investigate and manage GI dysfunction following cancer treatment has been published. This study reviewed gastrointestinal symptoms of women previously treated for gynaecological cancer and considered whether suggested algorithms could be amended to optimise management for this cohort.

METHODS

Demographic and clinical data recorded for patients attending a specialist consequences of cancer treatment gastroenterology service prospectively are reported using median and range. The Wilcoxon signed rank test analysed changes in symptoms between initial assessment to discharge from the service.

RESULTS

Between April 2013 and March 2016, 220 women, with a median age of 57 years (range 24-83 years), treated for gynaecological cancer (cervical (50%)), endometrial (28%), ovarian (15%), vaginal or vulval (7%) attended. Twelve gastrointestinal symptoms were statistically significantly reduced by time of discharge from the specialist gastroenterology clinic including bowel frequency ≥ 4/day (88%), type 6 or 7 stool consistency (36%), urgency (31%) and incontinence (21%). General quality of life improved from a median score of 4 at first assessment to a median of 6 at discharge (p < 0.001). A median of four (range, 1-9) diagnoses were made.

CONCLUSION

Women with gastrointestinal symptoms after cancer treatment benefit from a systematic management approach. After excluding disease recurrence, a proposed investigational algorithm and the oncology team includes FBC, U&Es, LFTs, thyroid function test, vitamin B12, vitamin D, a hydrogen methane breath test and a SeHCAT scan. If rectal bleeding is present, iron studies, flexible sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy should be performed. Patients with normal investigations or symptoms not responding to treatment require gastroenterology input.

Usefulness of computed tomography venography in gynecologic cancer patients with lower extremity edema

Lower extremity (LEx) edema is a common complication in gynecologic cancer patients. There are 2 main causes of edema in these patients such as deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and lymphedema. Early diagnosis and treatment of DVT are certainly important, but it is often difficult to evaluate proximal DVT by using ultrasound. The aim of this study is to demonstrate the usefulness of computed tomography venography of the lower extremity (CTV LEx) for the diagnosis of the DVT and investigate predictive factor of DVT in gynecologic cancer patients with LEx edema.The medical records of 415 gynecologic cancer patients who were referred to the department of rehabilitation medicine with LEx edema were retrospectively reviewed in this case-controlled study. We categorized CTV LEx findings as follows: DVT proximal to the inguinal ligament (inferior vena cava or iliac vein thrombosis) and DVT distal to the inguinal ligament (femoral, popliteal, or calf vein thrombosis). We also evaluated patient characteristics including D-dimer level. We analyzed the correlation of each factor with DVT frequency and used receiver operating characteristic curve analysis to determine the appropriate D-dimer threshold.Sixty-six patients were diagnosed with DVT; of them, 35 (53%) had DVT proximal to the inguinal ligament. Twenty-two patients were diagnosed with pulmonary embolism, of whom 15 had proximal DVT. Patients with proximal DVT tended to have pulmonary embolism (P < .001). Distal organ metastasis (odds ratio [OR], 2.88; P = .002) and a high D-dimer level (OR, 1.13; P = .001) were correlated with DVT.CTV LEx is a useful diagnostic tool for gynecologic cancer patients with LEx edema, particularly high-risk patients, that should be performed at the initial evaluation.

Assessment of the feasibility and acceptability, and pre-test of the utility of an individualized survivorship care plan (ISCP) for women with endometrial cancers during the transition of the end of active treatment to cancer survivorship

The transition from the end of active treatment to survivorship holds many challenges for women with endometrial cancer (WEC) and for the organization of health services. The feasibility and acceptability of implementing an individualized survivorship care plan (ISCP) at the end of treatment are documented as potential solutions. The utility of an ISCP on three indicators (SUNS, FCRI, and HeiQ) was pre-tested by comparing two groups of WEC (control and exposed to the ISCP). The WEC exposed to the ISCP had fewer needs, a lesser intensity of fear of cancer recurrence, and better health-related empowerment skills three months after the end of treatment, as compared to the control group. Obstacles of time, resources, and organization were raised.

BACKGROUND

The transition from the end of active treatment to cancer survivorship is a time of imbalance and turbulence for women with endometrial cancer (WEC). The transition to survivorship continues to be uncoordinated and the need for information about the side effects to watch for and the health risks is unmet. The implementation of an individualized survivorship care plan (ISCP) is suggested as an information and communication tool that could be a solution for facilitating the transition from the end of treatment to the beginning of survivorship.

RESEARCH OBJECTIVE AND METHOD

To assess and document the feasibility and acceptability of implementing an ISCP, qualitative data were gathered from WEC, oncology nurse navigators (ONN), and family doctors. A pre-experimental research design with a non-equivalent control group, an end of treatment (T0), and a three-month follow-up (T1) allowed us to pre-test its utility according to three indicators: (1) overall needs (SUNS); (2) fear of cancer recurrence (FCRI); and (3) empowerment (HeiQ) according to exposure to ISCP (control versus exposed) and to the time of measurement in the transition period (T0 versus T1).

RESULTS

The sample was made up of 18 WEC for the group exposed to the ISCP and 13 WEC for the control group, 12 general practitioners, and two ONN. After ONN training, the ISCP completion time varied between 60 and 75 minutes, and the meeting for providing the ISCP lasted 45-60 minutes. The WEC supported the idea that meetings with the ONN and the ISCP were useful in meeting their needs for information and support. The family doctors supported its relevancy in favouring follow-up and better subsequent healthcare management, as well as in reassuring patients and avoiding a sense of abandonment at the end of treatment. Comparing the group exposed to the ISCP versus the control group, fewer reported needs can be observed: information: 35% versus 74%, p = .030; professional and financial: 6% versus 19%, p = .057; access and continuity: 9% versus 25%, p = .078; support: 18% versus 50%, p = .007, emotional: 13% versus 28%, p = .044). Moreover, at T1, empowerment according to the skill and technique acquisition sub-scale shows a higher trend (M = 75.00 (10.21) versus M = 64.06 (10.67), p = .097). The level of fear of recurrence remains above the clinically significant score of 13 for both groups at the two times of measurement.

DISCUSSION

The ISCP is an informational tool that seeks to facilitate care-related communication and coordination between specialized and primary care. It is intended to facilitate the transition from the end of treatment to survivorship and survivors' commitment to health-related empowerment behaviours. The feasibility and utility of implementing an ISCP are supported if additional professional, organizational, and financial resources are specified and mobilized.

Development and validation of an individualized survivorship care plan (ISCP) for women with endometrial cancer during the transition of the end of active treatment to the cancer survivorship

Many cancer survivors finish their treatment without knowing the associated health risks and few are prepared to handle their health needs in the survivorship phase. Moreover, practical guides for follow- up care are not available and survivors' psychological and social needs often go unassessed. In this article, we propose the development and implementation of an individualized follow-up care plan (IFCP) after active treatment for women with endometrial cancers (WEC) to meet their needs for information and to facilitate the transition to the survivorship phase.

Background

The after-treatment phase is a distinct phase that is still neglected in the oncological continuum of care. It is the transition between two phases in the care trajectory-treatment and survivorship-that gives rise to many challenges for survivors, care providers and the healthcare system alike.

Research goal

Aiming to facilitate the transition between the end of active treatment and the cancer survivorship phases, we pursued two objectives: 1) Develop an individualized follow-up care plan (IFCP) based on both the literature and the perspective of WEC, healthcare professionals involved with the target clientele and oncology outreach managers, and 2) Have this IFCP validated by an interdisciplinary team.

Methodology

For the first objective, WEC-related needs at the end of active treatment (immediate end, three months and six months), as well as the perceptions of health professionals and oncology outreach managers were gathered by interview and group discussion on the benefit of an IFCP, its content and desired format. A content analysis of the interview data was performed using the Miles and Huberman approach (2003). For the second objective, an iterative consultation process with health professionals allowed for validation by consensus. These two objectives are the first qualitative phase of a mixed-methods sequential exploratory design that will make the development of an IFCP possible. In the second phase, we conducted a feasibility study of the implementation of the IFCP during the end of active treatment transition to cancer survivorship transition. This will be the subject of a second article.

Results

The interviews (n=47) revealed WECs' lack of preparation for the transition from the end of active treatment to the cancer survivorship. The following needs were specified: information (80%), emotional support, particularly to overcome their fear of recurrence (75%), the management of physical symptoms (45%), and support for adapting to change (45%). The data gathered from healthcare professionals and outreach managers support the utility of an IFCP in meeting these needs. The iterative validation process by the interdisciplinary team made consensus on the format and content possible. The final version of the IFCP is seen as a tool for information and communication in the survivorship phase. Some obstacles to its transfer to clinical practice are reported.

Conclusion

This study presents the entire process that led to the development of an IFCP that integrates both the needs of endometrial cancer survivors and the opinions of healthcare professionals and the oncology outreach managers organizing this care. Indications on how the IFCP could be implemented within this organization are also formulated.

Palliative care needs of patients with gynaecologic cancer

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

To identify gynaecologic cancer patients' palliative care needs using the three levels of needs questionnaire.

BACKGROUND

Measuring both the burden of symptoms and patient-reported palliative care needs is valuable to improve cancer care. Data representing the palliative care needs of cancer patients in Turkey remain limited.

DESIGN

A cross-sectional descriptive study.

METHODS

A total of 134 cancer patients were included in the study at an oncology hospital in Turkey. A data collection form, a short-form medical outcomes health survey, and the three levels of needs questionnaire were used to collect data.

RESULTS

The mean age of participants was 59 ± 8·76, of 69·4% were diagnosed with ovarian cancer and 52·2% had stage-3-4 cancer. Of patients, 69·3% had no desire for sexual intimacy, 33·5% expressed feeling as though they burden their families and 28·4% feel lonely at some level. The most prevalent problems were tiredness, to feel depressed and problems performing physical activities. The most frequent unmet needs were tiredness (60·5%), feel depressed (47·4%) and lack of appetite (38·5%).

CONCLUSIONS

Gynaecologic cancer patients have relatively high prevalence of symptoms and unmet palliative care needs. Health professions mostly were unable to recognise and properly manage tiredness, depression as well as lack of appetite as an integral part of quality cancer care.

RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE

Nurses trained in palliative care are needed to evaluate and meet cancer patients' needs regularly to improve quality of palliative care. Nurses should examine the underlying reasons for most prevalent problems and give nursing care accordingly.

Cervical cancer survivors' and partners' experiences with sexual dysfunction and psychosexual support

PURPOSE

The purpose of the study was to assess experiences with sexual dysfunctions, psychosexual support, and psychosexual healthcare needs among cervical cancer survivors (CCSs) and their partners.

METHODS

Semi-structured interviews were conducted with CCSs (n = 30) and their partners (n = 12).

RESULTS

Many participants experienced one or more sexual dysfunctions often causing feelings of distress. Most participants reported having been asked about their sexual functioning, although attention for sexual functioning was often limited and medically oriented. Considering sexuality a taboo topic hampered some participants to seek help. Many participants desired information about treatment consequences for sexual functioning, practical advice on dealing with dysfunctions, and reassurance that it is common to experience sexual dysfunction. A website was generally considered a useful and accessible first resource for information about sexual functioning after cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

Sexual dysfunctions are often distressing. Many patients and partners experience psychosexual healthcare needs, but the provided information and care is generally limited. Psychosexual support should go beyond physical sexual functioning and should take aspects such as sexual distress, relationship satisfaction, and the partner perspective into account. Additionally, offering more practical and reassuring information about sexuality after cervical cancer would be valuable for both CCSs and their partners.

Survivors of gynecologic malignancies: impact of treatment on health and well-being

PURPOSE

While overall survival from gynecologic malignancies has greatly improved over the last three decades, required treatments can lead to multiple health issues for survivors. Our objective was to identify health concerns that gynecologic cancer survivors face.

METHODS

A systematic, stratified sample of women with gynecologic malignancies was surveyed for 18 health issues occurring before, during, or after treatment. The impact of clinical features and treatment modality on health issues was assessed through multivariate logistic regression models.

RESULTS

Of 2,546 surveys mailed, 622 were not received by eligible subjects secondary to invalid address, incorrect diagnosis, or death. Thus, 1924 survivors potentially received surveys. Of the 1,029 surveys (53.5%) completed, median age was 59 years; diagnoses included 29% cervical, 26% endometrial, 26% ovarian/primary peritoneal/fallopian tube, 12.1% vulvar, and 5.4% vaginal cancers. The most frequently reported health issues included fatigue (60.6%), sleep disturbance (54.9%), urinary difficulties (50.9%), sexual dysfunction (48.4%), neurologic issues (45.4%), bowel complaints (42.0%), depression (41.3%), and memory problems (41.2%). These rankings were consistent with patients' self-reported rankings of "highest impact" personal issues. After controlling for demographic and clinical variables, multivariate analyses revealed that treatment modality impacted the odds of experiencing a given health issue.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study demonstrates that gynecologic cancer survivors experience a high frequency of health conditions and highlights the association between treatment modality and specific health concerns.

IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS

The study findings highlight the multiple health concerns experienced by gynecologic cancer survivors and suggest the potential for developing interventions to mitigate these concerns in survivorship.

Outcome of the Gynecologic Oncology Patients Surveillance Network Program

The gynecologic oncology patients surveillance network program was conducted with the collaboration of 5 provincial hospitals located in the north of Thailand (Chiang Rai, Lamphun Nan, Phayao and Phrae). The aim was to identify ways of reducing the burden and the cost to the gynecologic cancer patients who needed to travel to the tertiary care hospital for follow up. The clinical data of each patient was transferred to the provincial hospital by the internet via the website www.gogcmu.or.th. All the general gynecologists who participated in this project attended the training course set up for the program. From January 2011 to February 2014, 854 patients who were willing to have their next follow-up at the network hospitals close to their home were enrolled this project. Almost of them were residents in Chiang Rai province and the most common disease was cervical cancer. After the project had been running for 1 year, 604 of the enrolled patients and 21 health-care personnel who had participated in this project were interviewed to assess its success. Some 85.3% of the patients and 100% of the health-care personnel were satisfied with this project. However, 60 patients had withdrawn, the most common reason being the lack of confidence in the follow up at the local provincial hospital. In conclusion, it is possible to initiate a gynecologic oncology patients' surveillance network program and the initiation could reduce the problems associated with and the cost the patients incurred as they journeyed to the tertiary care hospital.

Comparison of Lower Extremity Edema in Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer: Pretreatment Laparoscopic Surgical Staging with Tailored Radiotherapy Versus Primary Radiotherapy

BACKGROUND

This study investigated the clinical manifestations of lower extremity edema (LEE) in locally advanced cervical cancer patients treated with two different strategies.

METHODS

In total, 79 cervical cancer survivors with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage IB2-IIB were included. Six survivors with stage IB1 and who had been suspicious for lymph node metastasis on pretreatment image also were included. Forty-two patients received radiotherapy after pretreatment laparoscopic surgical staging (Group 1), and 43 patients received primary radiotherapy (Group 2). The patients' medical records and survey results of the Korean version of the Gynecologic Cancer Lymphedema Questionnaire (GCLQ-K) were analyzed.

RESULTS

The incidence of LEE was higher in Group 1 than in Group 2 (69.0 vs. 11.6 %; P < 0.001). The duration of LEE was longer in Group 1 (mean 77.3 vs. 9.4 months). At the time of survey, 47.6 % of the patients in Group 1 were clinically diagnosed with lymphedema compared with no patients in Group 2. In GCLQ-K, the mean symptom cluster scores for general swelling (0.74 vs. 0.09; P < 0.001), limb swelling (0.22 vs. 0.00; P = 0.006), and heaviness (0.45 vs. 0.23; P = 0.033) were significantly higher in Group 1. One patient in Group 1 developed lymphedema-related angiosarcoma that was diagnosed at 7.8 years after surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with cervical cancer who underwent radiotherapy after laparoscopic surgical staging more commonly experienced LEE and related symptoms than patients who underwent primary radiotherapy. As LEE decreases patients' quality of life, it should be considered during patient consultation and surveillance.

Feasibility of a lifestyle intervention for overweight/obese endometrial and breast cancer survivors using an interactive mobile application

OBJECTIVE

The study aimed to assess a one-month lifestyle intervention delivered via a web- and mobile-based weight-loss application (app) (LoseIt!) using a healthcare-provider interface.

METHODS

Early-stage overweight/obese (body mass index [BMI]≥25kg/m(2)) cancer survivors (CS) diagnosed in the past three years, and without recurrent disease were enrolled and received exercise and nutrition counseling using the LoseIt! app. Entry and exit quality of life (FACT-G) and Weight Efficacy Lifestyle Questionnaire (WEL) measuring self-efficacy were measured along with anthropometrics, daily food intake, and physical activity (PA) using the app.

RESULTS

Mean participant age was 58.4±10.3years (n=50). Significant reductions (p<0.0006) in anthropometrics were noted between pre- and post-intervention weight (105.0±21.8kg versus 98.6±22.5kg); BMI (34.9±8.7kg/m(2) versus 33.9±8.4kg/m(2)); and waist circumference (108.1±14.9cm versus 103.7±15.1cm). A significant improvement in pre- and post-intervention total WEL score was noted (99.38±41.8 versus 120.19±47.1, p=0.043). No significant differences were noted in FACT-G, macronutrient consumption, and PA patterns.

CONCLUSION

These results indicate that a lifestyle intervention delivered via a web- and mobile-based weight-loss app is a feasible option by which to elicit short-term reductions in weight. Though these results parallel the recent survivors of uterine cancer empowered by exercise and healthy diet (SUCCEED) trial, it is notable that they were achieved without encumbering significant cost and barrier-access issues (i.e. time, transportation, weather, parking, etc.).

The management of secondary lower limb lymphoedema in cancer patients: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Lower limb lymphoedema is a recognised complication of cancer commonly encountered in palliative care, associated with reduced mobility and poor quality of life.

AIM

To evaluate the available evidence for the treatment of secondary lower limb lymphoedema in patients with malignancies.

DESIGN

A systematic review of the literature.

DATA SOURCES

The MEDLINE, Embase, LILACS, Science Citation Index, Cochrane Databases and conference proceedings for published data from date of inception to July 2014 were searched. Relevant unpublished studies via relevant databases, Internet searches and hand-searches of the bibliographies of relevant papers were performed.

RESULTS

From 1617 citations, 32 papers were selected for full-text assessment. Two randomised trials and five observational studies were identified. The two randomised controlled trials evaluated graded compression stockings and Coumarin capsules, respectively. The five observational studies evaluated lymphovenous microsurgical shunts, pneumatic compression devices, compression bandages alone, manual lymphatic drainage with compression and a herbal remedy combining Coumarin, Ginkgo and Melitoto (with or without manual lymphatic drainage), respectively. The extracted studies showed substantial heterogeneity. Hence, a meta-analysis was inappropriate and not performed.

CONCLUSION

Few studies have evaluated the clinical effectiveness and potential side effects of treatments for lower limb lymphoedema. Moreover, symptoms and quality-of-life assessments were inconsistently reported. All included studies report lower limb volume reduction after treatment, which includes complex decongestion therapy, graded compression stockings and lymphovenous microsurgical shunts. Adequately powered randomised controlled trials of these interventions are recommended. Effort should be made to establish standardised outcomes, to minimise bias and to improve reporting quality in future trials of treatment for lower limb lymphoedema.

Evaluation of the quality of life of caregivers in gynecological cancer patients

The aim of this study was to determine the factors influencing the general quality of life and the quality-of-life subdimensions of family members caring for gynecological cancer patients. This descriptive study was conducted at a training and research hospital in Turkey. A total of 168 caregivers who were family members were included in the study sample. The data collection form and the Caregiver Quality-of-Life Index Cancer Scale were used to collect data. The mean age of family caregivers was 42.6 ± 12.30 and 81% were female. The caregivers had the most problem with coping with the depressive symptoms and the nausea of the patient and with medication use for the patient. Information on care was requested by 35.7%, whereas 70% of this group felt they needed information on every subject regarding disease and its treatment. It is also found that although some factors did not influence the general quality of life of caregivers, they did have a negative effect on various areas such as burden, disruptiveness, positive adaptation, and financial concerns. Health care professions should educate patients and their caregivers who are distant relatives of patient or providing care for older patients especially on medical drug usage after discharge and management of symptoms such as nausea.