1
|
Aytekin O, Kerinc SK, Tokalioglu AA, Ucar YO, Kilic F, Comert GK, Ucar G, Civelek B, Turan T. Does neoadjuvant chemotherapy reduce surgical complexity in patients with advanced-stage epithelial ovarian cancer? BMC Womens Health 2024; 24:435. [PMID: 39085835 PMCID: PMC11290156 DOI: 10.1186/s12905-024-03280-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2024] [Accepted: 07/23/2024] [Indexed: 08/02/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study aimed to determine the effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) on the complex surgical procedures required in addition to staging surgery for the need to achieve a residual tumor 1 cm or less in a population of stage IIIC-IV epithelial ovarian cancer patients. METHODS Patients were referred for NACT if preoperative imaging and/or intraoperative evaluation confirmed that it was not possible to achieve a residual tumor size of 1 cm or less with cytoreductive surgery or if the patient had a poor performance status and a high American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score. Surgical complexity was defined as complex or non-complex. RESULTS One hundred and twenty-six patients with stage IIIC-IV ovarian cancer were included in the study. Primary cytoreductive surgery was performed in 67 patients, and interval cytoreductive surgery was performed in 59 patients after NACT. At least one complex surgery was performed in 74.6% of the patients in the primary cytoreductive surgery group and in 61% of the patients in the NACT group, with no statistically significant difference between the groups. However, the NACT group showed significantly decreased rates of low-rectal resection, diaphragmatic peritoneal stripping, and peritonectomy. CONCLUSIONS The analyses showed no reduction in the requirement for at least one complex surgical procedure in the group of patients who underwent NACT. Nevertheless, this group exhibited a significant decrease in low-rectal resection, diaphragmatic peritoneal stripping, and peritonectomy due to their effectiveness in reducing peritoneal disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Okan Aytekin
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Ankara Bilkent City Hospital, 06800, Ankara, Turkey.
| | | | | | - Yesim Ozkaya Ucar
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Ankara Bilkent City Hospital, 06800, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Fatih Kilic
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Ankara Bilkent City Hospital, 06800, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Gunsu Kimyon Comert
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Ankara Bilkent City Hospital, 06800, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Gokhan Ucar
- Department of Medical Oncology, Ankara Bilkent City Hospital, 06800, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Burak Civelek
- Department of Medical Oncology, Ankara Bilkent City Hospital, 06800, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Taner Turan
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Ankara Bilkent City Hospital, 06800, Ankara, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Chase DM, Mahajan A, Scott DA, Hawkins N, Kalilani L. The impact of varying levels of residual disease following cytoreductive surgery on survival outcomes in patients with ovarian cancer: a meta-analysis. BMC Womens Health 2024; 24:179. [PMID: 38491366 PMCID: PMC10941390 DOI: 10.1186/s12905-024-02977-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2023] [Accepted: 02/17/2024] [Indexed: 03/18/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Residual disease following cytoreductive surgery in patients with ovarian cancer has been associated with poorer survival outcomes compared with no residual disease. We performed a meta-analysis to assess the impact of varying levels of residual disease status on survival outcomes in patients with ovarian cancer who have undergone primary cytoreductive surgery or interval cytoreductive surgery in the setting of new therapies for this disease. METHODS Medline, Embase, and Cochrane databases (January 2011 - July 2020) and grey literature, bibliographic and key conference proceedings, were searched for eligible studies. Fixed and random-effects meta-analyses compared progression and survival by residual disease level across studies. Heterogeneity between comparisons was explored via type of surgery, disease stage, and type of adjuvant chemotherapy. RESULTS Of 2832 database and 16 supplementary search articles screened, 50 studies were selected; most were observational studies. The meta-analysis showed that median progression-free survival and overall survival decreased progressively with increasing residual disease (residual disease categories of 0 cm, > 0-1 cm and > 1 cm). Compared with no residual disease, hazard ratios (HR) for disease progression increased with increasing residual disease category (1.75 [95% confidence interval: 1.42, 2.16] for residual disease > 0-1 cm and 2.14 [1.34, 3.39] for residual disease > 1 cm), and also for reduced survival (HR versus no residual disease, 1.75 [ 1.62, 1.90] for residual disease > 0-1 cm and 2.32 [1.97, 2.72] for residual disease > 1 cm). All comparisons were significant (p < 0.05). Subgroup analyses showed an association between residual disease and disease progression/reduced survival irrespective of type of surgery, disease stage, or type of adjuvant chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS This meta-analysis provided an update on the impact of residual disease following primary or interval cytoreductive surgery, and demonstrated that residual disease was still highly predictive of progression-free survival and overall survival in adults with ovarian cancer despite changes in ovarian cancer therapy over the last decade. Higher numerical categories of residual disease were associated with reduced survival than lower categories.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dana M Chase
- David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Nikiforchin A, Sardi A, King MC, Baron E, Lopez-Ramirez F, Falla-Zuniga LF, Barakat P, Iugai S, Pawlikowski K, Nieroda C, Campbell K, Ryu H, Diaz-Montes T, Gushchin V. Collaborative expertise of gynecological and surgical oncologists in managing advanced epithelial ovarian cancer. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY 2024; 50:107948. [PMID: 38183864 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2023.107948] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/26/2023] [Accepted: 12/31/2023] [Indexed: 01/08/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Most patients with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) present with significant peritoneal spread. We assessed collaborative efforts of surgical and gynecological oncologists with expertise in cytoreductive surgery (CRS) in the management of advanced EOC. METHODS Using a prospective single-center database (2014-2022), we described the operative and oncologic outcomes of stage IIIC-IVA primary and recurrent EOC perioperatively managed jointly by gynecological and surgical oncologists both specializing in CRS and presented components of this collaboration. RESULTS Of 199 identified patients, 132 (66 %) had primary and 53 (27 %) had recurrent EOC. Due to inoperable disease, 14 (7 %) cases were aborted and excluded from analysis. Median peritoneal cancer index (PCI) in primary and recurrent patients was 21 (IQR: 11-28) and 21 (IQR: 6-31). Upper abdominal surgery was required in 95 % (n = 125) of primary and 89 % (n = 47) of recurrent patients. Bowel resections were performed in 83 % (n = 110) and 72 % (n = 38), respectively. Complete cytoreduction (CC-0/1) with no disease or residual lesions <2.5 mm was achieved in 95 % (n = 125) of primary and 91 % (n = 48) of recurrent patients. Ninety-day Clavien-Dindo grade III-IV morbidity was 12 % (n = 16) and 21 % (n = 11), respectively. Median follow-up was 44 (95%CI: 33-55) months. Median overall survival in primary and recurrent EOC was 68 (95%CI: 45-91) and 50 (95%CI: 16-84) months. Median progression-free survival was 26 (95%CI: 22-30) and 14 (95%CI: 7-21) months, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Perioperative collaboration between surgical and gynecological oncologists specializing in CRS allows safe performance of complete cytoreduction in the majority of patients with primary and recurrent EOC, despite high tumor burden.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrei Nikiforchin
- Surgical Oncology, The Institute for Cancer Care, Mercy Medical Center, 227 St. Paul Place, 4th Floor Weinberg Building, Baltimore, MD, 21202-2001, USA
| | - Armando Sardi
- Surgical Oncology, The Institute for Cancer Care, Mercy Medical Center, 227 St. Paul Place, 4th Floor Weinberg Building, Baltimore, MD, 21202-2001, USA.
| | - Mary Caitlin King
- Surgical Oncology, The Institute for Cancer Care, Mercy Medical Center, 227 St. Paul Place, 4th Floor Weinberg Building, Baltimore, MD, 21202-2001, USA
| | - Ekaterina Baron
- Surgical Oncology, The Institute for Cancer Care, Mercy Medical Center, 227 St. Paul Place, 4th Floor Weinberg Building, Baltimore, MD, 21202-2001, USA
| | - Felipe Lopez-Ramirez
- Surgical Oncology, The Institute for Cancer Care, Mercy Medical Center, 227 St. Paul Place, 4th Floor Weinberg Building, Baltimore, MD, 21202-2001, USA
| | - Luis Felipe Falla-Zuniga
- Surgical Oncology, The Institute for Cancer Care, Mercy Medical Center, 227 St. Paul Place, 4th Floor Weinberg Building, Baltimore, MD, 21202-2001, USA
| | - Philipp Barakat
- Surgical Oncology, The Institute for Cancer Care, Mercy Medical Center, 227 St. Paul Place, 4th Floor Weinberg Building, Baltimore, MD, 21202-2001, USA
| | - Sergei Iugai
- Surgical Oncology, The Institute for Cancer Care, Mercy Medical Center, 227 St. Paul Place, 4th Floor Weinberg Building, Baltimore, MD, 21202-2001, USA
| | - Kathleen Pawlikowski
- Surgical Oncology, The Institute for Cancer Care, Mercy Medical Center, 227 St. Paul Place, 4th Floor Weinberg Building, Baltimore, MD, 21202-2001, USA
| | - Carol Nieroda
- Surgical Oncology, The Institute for Cancer Care, Mercy Medical Center, 227 St. Paul Place, 4th Floor Weinberg Building, Baltimore, MD, 21202-2001, USA
| | - Kurtis Campbell
- Surgical Oncology, The Institute for Cancer Care, Mercy Medical Center, 227 St. Paul Place, 4th Floor Weinberg Building, Baltimore, MD, 21202-2001, USA
| | - Hyung Ryu
- Gynecological Oncology, The Lya Segall Ovarian Cancer Institute, Mercy Medical Center, 227 St. Paul Place, 6th Floor Weinberg Building, Baltimore, MD, 21202-2001, USA
| | - Teresa Diaz-Montes
- Gynecological Oncology, The Lya Segall Ovarian Cancer Institute, Mercy Medical Center, 227 St. Paul Place, 6th Floor Weinberg Building, Baltimore, MD, 21202-2001, USA
| | - Vadim Gushchin
- Surgical Oncology, The Institute for Cancer Care, Mercy Medical Center, 227 St. Paul Place, 4th Floor Weinberg Building, Baltimore, MD, 21202-2001, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Chase DM, Mahajan A, Scott DA, Hawkins N, Kalilani L. Correlation between progression-free survival and overall survival in patients with ovarian cancer after cytoreductive surgery: a systematic literature review. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2023; 33:1602-1611. [PMID: 37643825 PMCID: PMC10579502 DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2023-004487] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2023] [Accepted: 07/12/2023] [Indexed: 08/31/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This analysis aimed to better define the relationship between progression-free survival and overall survival in adult patients with ovarian cancer (including fallopian tube or primary peritoneal cancer) following primary cytoreductive surgery or interval cytoreductive surgery. METHODS A systematic literature review was carried out across the Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Central databases on 7 July 2020 (date limits 1 January 2011 to 7 July 2020) to identify studies with the following eligibility criteria: clinical trials/observational studies including >200 patients with ovarian cancer aged ≥18 years, evaluating overall survival/progression-free survival following cytoreductive surgery by residual disease status in the United States, Europe, Japan, or China. Weighted linear regression models were used to assess any correlation between median progression-free survival and overall survival, and between logHR for progression-free survival and logHR for overall survival. Risk of bias was assessed for all included studies. RESULTS Of the 50 studies reported, 43 were observational studies (41 retrospective and two prospective cohort studies), and seven were reporting for randomized clinical trials-of which four were retrospective data analyses. For analyses of the relationship between overall survival and progression-free survival, 21 studies were eligible. The weighted linear regression model showed a strong positive association between the two survival endpoints. Goodness-of-fit analysis measured the adjusted R2 as 0.84 (p<0.001); a positive association was also observed between logHRs for overall survival and progression-free survival in the included studies. CONCLUSIONS Median progression-free survival was predictive of median overall survival. This correlation between progression-free survival and overall survival after primary treatment for ovarian cancer highlights the validity of progression-free survival as a primary endpoint. Observational studies contributed most data, with limited information on disease stage and histology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dana M Chase
- Gyncologic Oncology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Costantini B, Rosati A, Vargiu V, Gallitelli V, Di Ilio C, Moroni R, Scambia G, Fagotti A. Visual Peritoneal Evaluation of Residual Disease After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Advanced Ovarian Cancer Patients: The VIPER Study. Ann Surg Oncol 2023; 30:2319-2328. [PMID: 36745255 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-022-12861-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2022] [Accepted: 11/09/2022] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Chemotherapy induces histopathological tumor necrosis and fibrosis which results in macroscopic tissue changes, making surgeons' intraoperative visual evaluation of the disease distribution more difficult to interpret. The aim of the study was to assess the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of intraoperative laparoscopic visual evaluation of the diaphragmatic peritoneum and compare it with histopathological examination. METHODS Patients receiving diaphragmatic peritonectomy at time of IDS were retrospectively included. The population was grouped based on the surgeon's assessment of the diaphragmatic peritoneum during diagnostic laparoscopy. Group 1 included patients with a "visually pathologic" diaphragmatic peritoneum, and group 2 included patients with a "visually dubious" diaphragmatic peritoneum. Sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, and accuracy were calculated considering the final formalin-fixed pathology as the reference standard. RESULTS 155 patients were included (92 in group 1 and 63 in group 2). The accuracy rate of visual examination was 67.1%, the negative predictive value was 19%, specificity was 100%, and sensitivity was 64.3%. CONCLUSION NACT strongly affects the ability of the surgeon to discern between peritoneal scars and truly pathologic peritoneum. The diaphragmatic laparoscopic visual examination showed a low overall accuracy. We propose an algorithm that can guide the surgeon towards a more tailored approach to diaphragmatic peritonectomy during IDS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Barbara Costantini
- Department of Woman and Child Health and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Andrea Rosati
- Department of Woman and Child Health and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Virginia Vargiu
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Gemelli Molise SpA, Campobasso, Italy
| | - Vitalba Gallitelli
- Department of Woman and Child Health and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
- Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Chiara Di Ilio
- Department of Woman and Child Health and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
- Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Rossana Moroni
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Giovanni Scambia
- Department of Woman and Child Health and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
- Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
| | - Anna Fagotti
- Department of Woman and Child Health and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
- Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Stapled diaphragm resection: A new approach to diaphragmatic cytoreductive surgery for advanced-stage ovarian cancer. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2022; 279:88-93. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2022.10.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2022] [Revised: 10/07/2022] [Accepted: 10/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
|
7
|
Importance of Laparoscopy in Predicting Complete Cytoreduction at Advanced Stage Ovarian Cancer. INDIAN JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY 2022. [DOI: 10.1007/s40944-022-00664-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
|
8
|
Rush SK, Lees BF, Huang DS, Peterson MF, Al-Niaimi A. Splenectomy at the time of primary or interval cytoreductive surgery for epithelial ovarian carcinoma: A review of outcomes. Gynecol Oncol 2022; 167:283-288. [PMID: 36114028 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2022.08.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2022] [Revised: 08/18/2022] [Accepted: 08/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES We describe post-operative complications after cytoreductive surgery with and without splenectomy for Stage III or IV epithelial ovarian cancer, and identify areas for quality improvement in post-splenectomy care. METHODS All patients with ovarian cancer cytoreductive surgery from 2008 to 2018 were identified using an institutional database Gynecologic Oncology Longitudinal Data Collection and Utilization Program (GOLD CUP). We compared patients who had and did not have splenectomy as part of cytoreductive surgery by demographics, comorbidities, stage, operative and post-operative data, readmission rates, progression free survival, overall survival and death from disease. Quality metrics reported include receipt of post-splenectomy education handouts and encapsulated-organism vaccines. Statistical analysis was completed in STATA SE 16.0. RESULTS We identified 47 patients who underwent splenectomy and 454 who did not during primary or interval cytoreductive surgery. Final stage was IIIB in 1 (2.1%), IIIC in 26 (55.3%), IVA in 7 (14.9%), and IVB in 13 (27.7%) patients. Those with splenectomy had significantly higher stage. Surgery duration and hospital length of stay were longer and blood transfusion more common after splenectomy, but there were no differences in post-operative infection, readmission, or overall survival. Pancreatic leaks were seen in 4/47 (8.5%) patients. Post-splenectomy vaccinations were documented in 42/47 (89.4%) patients. Only 2/47 (4.3%) received post-splenectomy discharge instructions and 3/7 (42.9%) received aspirin for platelets 1 million or more. CONCLUSIONS While splenectomy adds morbidity, it continues to offer benefit in those patients who can achieve optimal cytoreduction. Areas for quality improvement in post-splenectomy care include receipt of vaccinations, patient discharge information, and timely pancreatic fistula management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shannon K Rush
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Wisconsin - Madison, 600 Highland Drive, Madison, WI 53792, United States of America.
| | - Brittany F Lees
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Wisconsin - Madison, 600 Highland Drive, Madison, WI 53792, United States of America; Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Levine Cancer Institute at Atrium Health, 1021 Morehead Medical Drive, Suite 2100, Charlotte, NC 28204, United States of America
| | - Dandi S Huang
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Wisconsin - Madison, 600 Highland Drive, Madison, WI 53792, United States of America; Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, United States of America
| | - Megan F Peterson
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Wisconsin - Madison, 600 Highland Drive, Madison, WI 53792, United States of America
| | - Ahmed Al-Niaimi
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Wisconsin - Madison, 600 Highland Drive, Madison, WI 53792, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Bryant A, Hiu S, Kunonga PT, Gajjar K, Craig D, Vale L, Winter-Roach BA, Elattar A, Naik R. Impact of residual disease as a prognostic factor for survival in women with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer after primary surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2022; 9:CD015048. [PMID: 36161421 PMCID: PMC9512080 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd015048.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Ovarian cancer is the seventh most common cancer among women and a leading cause of death from gynaecological malignancies. Epithelial ovarian cancer is the most common type, accounting for around 90% of all ovarian cancers. This specific type of ovarian cancer starts in the surface layer covering the ovary or lining of the fallopian tube. Surgery is performed either before chemotherapy (upfront or primary debulking surgery (PDS)) or in the middle of a course of treatment with chemotherapy (neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) and interval debulking surgery (IDS)), with the aim of removing all visible tumour and achieving no macroscopic residual disease (NMRD). The aim of this review is to investigate the prognostic impact of size of residual disease nodules (RD) in women who received upfront or interval cytoreductive surgery for advanced (stage III and IV) epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). OBJECTIVES To assess the prognostic impact of residual disease after primary surgery on survival outcomes for advanced (stage III and IV) epithelial ovarian cancer. In separate analyses, primary surgery included both upfront primary debulking surgery (PDS) followed by adjuvant chemotherapy and neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval debulking surgery (IDS). Each residual disease threshold is considered as a separate prognostic factor. SEARCH METHODS We searched CENTRAL (2021, Issue 8), MEDLINE via Ovid (to 30 August 2021) and Embase via Ovid (to 30 August 2021). SELECTION CRITERIA We included survival data from studies of at least 100 women with advanced EOC after primary surgery. Residual disease was assessed as a prognostic factor in multivariate prognostic models. We excluded studies that reported fewer than 100 women, women with concurrent malignancies or studies that only reported unadjusted results. Women were included into two distinct groups: those who received PDS followed by platinum-based chemotherapy and those who received IDS, analysed separately. We included studies that reported all RD thresholds after surgery, but the main thresholds of interest were microscopic RD (labelled NMRD), RD 0.1 cm to 1 cm (small-volume residual disease (SVRD)) and RD > 1 cm (large-volume residual disease (LVRD)). DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two review authors independently abstracted data and assessed risk of bias. Where possible, we synthesised the data in meta-analysis. To assess the adequacy of adjustment factors used in multivariate Cox models, we used the 'adjustment for other prognostic factors' and 'statistical analysis and reporting' domains of the quality in prognosis studies (QUIPS) tool. We also made judgements about the certainty of the evidence for each outcome in the main comparisons, using GRADE. We examined differences between FIGO stages III and IV for different thresholds of RD after primary surgery. We considered factors such as age, grade, length of follow-up, type and experience of surgeon, and type of surgery in the interpretation of any heterogeneity. We also performed sensitivity analyses that distinguished between studies that included NMRD in RD categories of < 1 cm and those that did not. This was applicable to comparisons involving RD < 1 cm with the exception of RD < 1 cm versus NMRD. We evaluated women undergoing PDS and IDS in separate analyses. MAIN RESULTS We found 46 studies reporting multivariate prognostic analyses, including RD as a prognostic factor, which met our inclusion criteria: 22,376 women who underwent PDS and 3697 who underwent IDS, all with varying levels of RD. While we identified a range of different RD thresholds, we mainly report on comparisons that are the focus of a key area of clinical uncertainty (involving NMRD, SVRD and LVRD). The comparison involving any visible disease (RD > 0 cm) and NMRD was also important. SVRD versus NMRD in a PDS setting In PDS studies, most showed an increased risk of death in all RD groups when those with macroscopic RD (MRD) were compared to NMRD. Women who had SVRD after PDS had more than twice the risk of death compared to women with NMRD (hazard ratio (HR) 2.03, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.80 to 2.29; I2 = 50%; 17 studies; 9404 participants; moderate-certainty). The analysis of progression-free survival found that women who had SVRD after PDS had nearly twice the risk of death compared to women with NMRD (HR 1.88, 95% CI 1.63 to 2.16; I2 = 63%; 10 studies; 6596 participants; moderate-certainty). LVRD versus SVRD in a PDS setting When we compared LVRD versus SVRD following surgery, the estimates were attenuated compared to NMRD comparisons. All analyses showed an overall survival benefit in women who had RD < 1 cm after surgery (HR 1.22, 95% CI 1.13 to 1.32; I2 = 0%; 5 studies; 6000 participants; moderate-certainty). The results were robust to analyses of progression-free survival. SVRD and LVRD versus NMRD in an IDS setting The one study that defined the categories as NMRD, SVRD and LVRD showed that women who had SVRD and LVRD after IDS had more than twice the risk of death compared to women who had NMRD (HR 2.09, 95% CI 1.20 to 3.66; 310 participants; I2 = 56%, and HR 2.23, 95% CI 1.49 to 3.34; 343 participants; I2 = 35%; very low-certainty, for SVRD versus NMRD and LVRD versus NMRD, respectively). LVRD versus SVRD + NMRD in an IDS setting Meta-analysis found that women who had LVRD had a greater risk of death and disease progression compared to women who had either SVRD or NMRD (HR 1.60, 95% CI 1.21 to 2.11; 6 studies; 1572 participants; I2 = 58% for overall survival and HR 1.76, 95% CI 1.23 to 2.52; 1145 participants; I2 = 60% for progression-free survival; very low-certainty). However, this result is biased as in all but one study it was not possible to distinguish NMRD within the < 1 cm thresholds. Only one study separated NMRD from SVRD; all others included NMRD in the SVRD group, which may create bias when comparing with LVRD, making interpretation challenging. MRD versus NMRD in an IDS setting Women who had any amount of MRD after IDS had more than twice the risk of death compared to women with NMRD (HR 2.11, 95% CI 1.35 to 3.29, I2 = 81%; 906 participants; very low-certainty). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS In a PDS setting, there is moderate-certainty evidence that the amount of RD after primary surgery is a prognostic factor for overall and progression-free survival in women with advanced ovarian cancer. We separated our analysis into three distinct categories for the survival outcome including NMRD, SVRD and LVRD. After IDS, there may be only two categories required, although this is based on very low-certainty evidence, as all but one study included NMRD in the SVRD category. The one study that separated NMRD from SVRD showed no improved survival outcome in the SVRD category, compared to LVRD. Further low-certainty evidence also supported restricting to two categories, where women who had any amount of MRD after IDS had a significantly greater risk of death compared to women with NMRD. Therefore, the evidence presented in this review cannot conclude that using three categories applies in an IDS setting (very low-certainty evidence), as was supported for PDS (which has convincing moderate-certainty evidence).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew Bryant
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Shaun Hiu
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Patience T Kunonga
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Ketankumar Gajjar
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, 1st Floor Maternity Unit, City Hospital Campus, Nottingham, UK
| | - Dawn Craig
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Luke Vale
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Brett A Winter-Roach
- The Department of Surgery, Christie Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Ahmed Elattar
- City Hospital & Birmingham Treatment Centre, Birmingham, UK
| | - Raj Naik
- Gynaecological Oncology, Northern Gynaecological Oncology Centre, Gateshead, UK
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Huber D, Christodoulou M, Fournier I, Seidler S, Besse V, Hurni Y. How to perform complete resection of peritoneal carcinomatosis nodules infiltrating the diaphragm without opening the pleural cavity in patients with advanced-stage ovarian cancers. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod 2022; 51:102430. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jogoh.2022.102430] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2022] [Revised: 05/16/2022] [Accepted: 06/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
11
|
Hiu S, Bryant A, Gajjar K, Kunonga PT, Naik R. Ultra-radical (extensive) surgery versus standard surgery for the primary cytoreduction of advanced epithelial ovarian cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2022; 8:CD007697. [PMID: 36041232 PMCID: PMC9427128 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd007697.pub3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Ovarian cancer is the seventh most common cancer among women and the leading cause of death in women with gynaecological malignancies. Opinions differ regarding the role of ultra-radical (extensive) cytoreductive surgery in ovarian cancer treatment. OBJECTIVES To evaluate the effectiveness and morbidity associated with ultra-radical/extensive surgery in the management of advanced-stage epithelial ovarian cancer. SEARCH METHODS We searched CENTRAL (2021, Issue 11), MEDLINE Ovid and Embase Ovid up to November 2021. We also searched registers of clinical trials, abstracts of scientific meetings, reference lists of included studies and contacted experts in the field. SELECTION CRITERIA Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) or non-randomised studies (NRS), analysed using multivariate methods, that compared ultra-radical/extensive and standard surgery in women with advanced primary epithelial ovarian cancer. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two review authors independently assessed whether potentially relevant studies met the inclusion criteria, abstracted data and assessed the risk of bias. We identified three NRS and conducted meta-analyses where possible. MAIN RESULTS We identified three retrospective observational studies for inclusion in the review. Two studies included women exclusively undergoing upfront primary debulking surgery (PDS) and the other study including both PDS and interval debulking surgical (IDS) procedures. All studies were at critical risk of bias due to retrospective and non-randomised study designs. Meta-analysis of two studies, assessing 397 participants, found that women who underwent radical procedures, as part of PDS, may have a lower risk of mortality compared to women who underwent standard surgery (adjusted HR 0.60, 95% CI 0.43 to 0.82; I2 = 0%; very low-certainty evidence), but the evidence is very uncertain. The results were robust to a sensitivity analysis including women with more-extensive disease (carcinomatosis) (adjusted HR 0.61, 95% CI 0.44 to 0.85; I2 = 0%; n = 283, very low-certainty evidence), but the evidence is very uncertain. One study reported a comparison of radical versus standard surgical procedures associated with both PDS and IDS procedures, but a multivariate analysis was only undertaken for disease-free survival (DFS) and therefore the certainty of the evidence was not assessable for overall survival (OS) and remains very low. The lack of reporting of OS meant the study was at high risk of bias for selective reporting of outcomes. One study, 203 participants, found that women who underwent radical procedures as part of PDS may have a lower risk of disease progression or death compared to women who underwent standard surgery (adjusted HR 0.62, 95% CI 0.42 to 0.92; very low-certainty evidence), but the evidence is very uncertain. The results were robust to a sensitivity analysis in one study including women with carcinomatosis (adjusted HR 0.52, 95% CI 0.33 to 0.82; n = 139; very low-certainty evidence), but the evidence is very uncertain. A combined analysis in one study found that women who underwent radical procedures (using both PDS and IDS) may have an increased chance of disease progression or death than those who received standard surgery (adjusted HR 1.60, 95% CI 1.11 to 2.31; I2 = 0%; n = 527; very low-certainty evidence), but the evidence is very uncertain. In absolute and unadjusted terms, the DFS was 19.3 months in the standard surgery group, 15.8 in the PDS group and 15.9 months in the IDS group. All studies were at critical risk of bias and we only identified very low-certainty evidence for all outcomes reported in the review. Perioperative mortality, adverse events and quality of life (QoL) outcomes were either not reported or inadequately reported in the included studies. Two studies reported perioperative mortality (death within 30 days of surgery), but they did not use any statistical adjustment. In total, there were only four deaths within 30 days of surgery in both studies. All were observed in the standard surgery group, but we did not report a risk ratio (RR) to avoid potentially misleading results with so few deaths and very low-certainty evidence. Similarly, one study reported postoperative morbidity, but the authors did not use any statistical adjustment. Postoperative morbidity occurred more commonly in women who received ultra-radical surgery compared to standard surgery, but the certainty of the evidence was very low. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS We found only very low-certainty evidence comparing ultra-radical surgery and standard surgery in women with advanced ovarian cancer. The evidence was limited to retrospective, NRSs and so is at critical risk of bias. The results may suggest that ultra-radical surgery could result in improved OS, but results are based on very few women who were chosen to undergo each intervention, rather than a randomised study and intention-to-treat analysis, and so the evidence is very uncertain. Results for progression/DFS were inconsistent and evidence was sparse. QoL and morbidity was incompletely or not reported in the three included studies. A separate prognostic review assessing residual disease as a prognostic factor in this area has been addressed elsewhere, which demonstrates the prognostic effect of macroscopic debulking to no macroscopic residual disease. In order to aid existing guidelines, the role of ultra-radical surgery in the management of advanced-stage ovarian cancer could be addressed through the conduct of a sufficiently powered, RCT comparing ultra-radical and standard surgery, or well-designed NRSs, if this is not possible.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shaun Hiu
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Andrew Bryant
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Ketankumar Gajjar
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, 1st Floor Maternity Unit, City Hospital Campus, Nottingham, UK
| | - Patience T Kunonga
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Raj Naik
- Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Northern Gynaecological Oncology Centre, Gateshead, UK
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Cardillo N, Devor E, Calma C, Pedra Nobre S, Gabrilovich S, Bender DP, Goodheart M, Gonzalez‐Bosquet J. Investigating the effect of optimal cytoreduction in the context of platinum sensitivity in high-grade serous ovarian cancer. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2022; 101:1085-1092. [PMID: 35778930 PMCID: PMC9812110 DOI: 10.1111/aogs.14415] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2022] [Revised: 06/07/2022] [Accepted: 06/15/2022] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The survival benefits of surgical cytoreduction in ovarian cancer are well-established. However, the surgical outcome has never been assessed while controlling for the efficacy of chemotherapy. This leaves the possibility that cytoreduction may not be beneficial for patients whose cancer does not respond well to adjuvant treatment. We sought to answer whether surgical cytoreduction independently improves overall survival when controlling for chemotherapy outcome. MATERIAL AND METHODS We performed a retrospective case-control study using our institution's ovarian cancer database to evaluate the effect of optimal cytoreduction on advanced stage, high-grade serous ovarian cancer. Patients' characteristics were compared using both univariate and multivariate regression modeling to assess for independent predictors of overall survival. RESULTS A total of 470 patients were assessed for inclusion; 234 responders to chemotherapy and 98 nonresponders. Significant survival characteristics were identified and included in the multivariate analysis. Independent predictors of survival in the multivariate analysis were age, responder status, optimal cytoreduction, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and number of chemotherapy cycles. Kaplan-Meier survival curves showed improved survival for both patients who responded to chemotherapy and for those undergoing optimal cytoreduction (p < 0.001). We also demonstrated improved survival for patients receiving optimal cytoreduction among both nonresponders and responders (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Our analysis shows that patients who undergo optimal cytoreduction have an overall survival benefit regardless of their response to chemotherapy. Therefore, cytoreduction should be considered in all patients, even in those with advanced disease, if an optimal result can be achieved. This study was underpowered to assess patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy as a separate subgroup, but the order of treatment was controlled for in the overall analysis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicholas Cardillo
- Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyUniversity of IowaIowa CityIowaUSA
| | - Eric Devor
- Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyUniversity of IowaIowa CityIowaUSA
| | - Christian Calma
- Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyUniversity of IowaIowa CityIowaUSA
| | | | - Sofia Gabrilovich
- Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyUniversity of IowaIowa CityIowaUSA
| | - David P. Bender
- Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyUniversity of IowaIowa CityIowaUSA
| | - Michael Goodheart
- Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyUniversity of IowaIowa CityIowaUSA
| | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Odajima S, Tanabe H, Koike Y, Yokosu K. Retrospective Analysis of Total Parietal Peritonectomy Without Systematic Lymphadenectomy for Advanced Epithelial Ovarian Cancer. CANCER DIAGNOSIS & PROGNOSIS 2022; 2:482-488. [PMID: 35813015 PMCID: PMC9254101 DOI: 10.21873/cdp.10131] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2022] [Accepted: 05/11/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIM Total parietal peritonectomy (TPP) is a surgical procedure used for complete resection of microscopic peritoneal dissemination. This study analyzed the perioperative complications that developed when omitting systematic lymphadenectomy from TPP. PATIENTS AND METHODS We retrospectively analyzed perioperative complications in epithelial ovarian cancer patients with stage IIIB-IVB who underwent TPP during primary and interval cytoreductive surgeries between April 2018 and October 2021. RESULTS Thirty-three patients were enrolled in the study. The median patient age was 62 years. Of 31 patients (94%) with stage IIIC/IV disease, 24 (73%) had high-grade serous carcinoma. The median operative time and blood loss were 447 min and 2,831 ml, respectively. Complete tumor resection was performed in 30 patients (91%). Only five patients underwent partial lymphadenectomy for clinical metastatic lymph nodes. Further, grade 3 complications were observed in seven (21%) patients, and there were no fatal events in this study. Three patients (9%) had ureteric injuries, which was the most frequent complication in this study. Only one patient developed an intra-abdominal infection due to ascites. In this case, partial para-aortic and pelvic lymphadenectomies were performed. CONCLUSION TPP without systematic lymphadenectomy reduces the frequency of perioperative complications associated with ascites.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Suguru Odajima
- Department of Gynecology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Tanabe
- Department of Gynecology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, Japan
| | - Yuki Koike
- Department of Gynecology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, Japan
| | - Kota Yokosu
- Department of Gynecology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Nishikimi K, Tate S, Matsuoka A, Otsuka S, Shozu M. Predictors of postoperative pancreatic fistula after splenectomy with or without distal pancreatectomy performed as a component of cytoreductive surgery for advanced ovarian cancer. J Gynecol Oncol 2022; 33:e30. [PMID: 35128860 PMCID: PMC9024180 DOI: 10.3802/jgo.2022.33.e30] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2021] [Revised: 10/12/2021] [Accepted: 01/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Kyoko Nishikimi
- Department of Gynecology, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba, Japan
| | - Shinichi Tate
- Department of Gynecology, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba, Japan
| | - Ayumu Matsuoka
- Department of Gynecology, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba, Japan
| | - Satoyo Otsuka
- Department of Gynecology, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba, Japan
| | - Makio Shozu
- Department of Gynecology, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Kuru O, Cakır I, Akgor U, Sen S, Gorgulu G, Ozdemir HE, Basok BI, Akpınar G, Gokcu M. Serum markers for the early diagnosis of intestinal anastomotic leak after gyne-oncological operations. Int J Clin Pract 2021; 75:e14609. [PMID: 34231277 DOI: 10.1111/ijcp.14609] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2021] [Accepted: 07/02/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To analyse the serum markers for the early diagnosis of intestinal anastomotic leak (AL) after the gyne-oncological operations. METHODS Between September 2017 and March 2021, patients with an intestinal anastomosis performed during the gyne-oncological surgeries were identified from a tertiary centre in Turkey. As the local guideline of the clinic, all these patients were followed by measuring serum samples including procalcitonin (PCT) and C-reactive protein (CRP) on postoperative day (POD) 1 through the day of discharge or the day of re-operation for AL. RESULTS 12.5% (5/40) of the patients suffered an AL and 4 of them were re-operated. The mean albumin values on POD 3-4 and the mean platelet values on POD 1 were lower in the AL group (P < .05). Although it was not statistically significant (P > .05), median PCT values (ng/mL) on POD 8-10 were higher in the AL group compared with no leak group. The best cut-off point for PCT on POD 9 was determined to be 0.11 ng/mL (AUC: 0.917, Sensitivity = 100.0%, specificity = 66.7%, positive predictive value = 66.7%, negative predictive value = 100.0%). CONCLUSION Serum PCT and CRP concentrations were not found to be helpful for the early diagnosis of AL in patients operated for gyne-oncological malignancies. Low levels of albumin and platelets in the first days after the operation may be clue for a possible AL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oguzhan Kuru
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Tepecik Education and Research Hospital, Izmir, Turkey
| | - Ilker Cakır
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Tepecik Education and Research Hospital, Izmir, Turkey
| | - Utku Akgor
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, School of Medicine, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Serhat Sen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Izmir Katip Celebi University, Izmir, Turkey
| | - Goksen Gorgulu
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Tepecik Education and Research Hospital, Izmir, Turkey
| | - Hasan Emre Ozdemir
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Tepecik Education and Research Hospital, Izmir, Turkey
| | - Banu Isbilen Basok
- Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Tepecik Education and Research Hospital, Izmir, Turkey
| | - Goksever Akpınar
- Department of General Surgery, Tepecik Education and Research Hospital, Izmir, Turkey
| | - Mehmet Gokcu
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Tepecik Education and Research Hospital, Izmir, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Adamopoulou K, Gkamprana AM, Patsouras K, Halkia E. Addressing hepatic metastases in ovarian cancer: Recent advances in treatment algorithms and the need for a multidisciplinary approach. World J Hepatol 2021; 13:1122-1131. [PMID: 34630879 PMCID: PMC8473491 DOI: 10.4254/wjh.v13.i9.1122] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2021] [Revised: 07/21/2021] [Accepted: 08/11/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
The lifetime risk for ovarian cancer incidence is 1.39% and the lifetime risk of death is 1.04%. Most ovarian cancer patients are diagnosed at advanced stages (III, IV) because there were no specific symptoms or existing screening tests. Liver metastases have been found in up to 50% of patients dying of advanced ovarian cancer. Recent studies indicate the need for a multidisciplinary approach from initial diagnosis to oncologic surgery and chemotherapy treatment, mandating the involvement of gynecologic oncologists, surgical oncologist, medical oncologists, hepatobiliary surgeons, and interventional radiologists.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Athanasia M Gkamprana
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tzaneio General Hospital, Pireaus 18536, Greece
| | - Konstantinos Patsouras
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tzaneio General Hospital, Pireaus 18536, Greece
| | - Evgenia Halkia
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tzaneio General Hospital, Pireaus 18536, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Baum J, Braicu EI, Hunsicker O, Vergote I, Concin N, Van Nieuwenhuysen E, Feldheiser A, Achimas-Cadariu P, Darb-Esfahani S, Berger A, Fetica B, Mahner S, Papadia A, Wölber L, Gasparri ML, Vanderstichele A, Benedetti Panici P, Mueller MD, Ruscito I, Woopen H, Sehouli J. Impact of clinical factors and surgical outcome on long-term survival in high-grade serous ovarian cancer: a multicenter analysis. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2021; 31:713-720. [PMID: 33563640 DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2020-002023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2020] [Revised: 01/06/2021] [Accepted: 01/11/2021] [Indexed: 11/03/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Long-term survivors of ovarian cancer are a unique group of patients in whom prognostic factors for long-term survival have been poorly described. Such factors may provide information for a more personalized therapeutic approach. The objective of this study is to determine further characteristics of long-term survivors with high-grade serous ovarian cancer. METHODS Long-term survivors were defined as patients living longer than 8 years after first diagnosis and were recruited within seven high volume centers across Europe from November 1988 to November 2008. The control group included patients with high-grade serous ovarian cancer with less than 5 years' survival identified from the systematic 'Tumorbank ovarian cancer' database. A subanalysis of Charité patients only was performed separately for in-depth analysis of tumor dissemination. Propensity score matching with nearest-neighbor caliper width was used to match long-term survivors and the control group regarding age, FIGO stage, and residual tumor. RESULTS A total of 276 patients with high-grade serous ovarian cancer were included, divided into 131 long-term survivors and 145 control group patients. After propensity score matching and multivariable adjustment, platinum sensitivity (p=0.002) was an independent favorable prognostic factor whereas recurrence (p<0.001) and ascites (p=0.021) were independent detrimental predictors for long-term survival. Significantly more long-term survivors tested positive for mutation in the BRCA1 gene than the BRCA2 gene (p=0.016). Intraoperatively, these patients had less tumor involvement of the upper abdomen at initial surgery (p=0.024). Complexity of surgery and surgical techniques were similar in both cohorts. CONCLUSION Platinum sensitivity constitutes a favorable factor for long-term survival whereas tumor involvement of the upper abdomen, ascites, and recurrence have a negative impact. Based on clinical estimation, long-term survival is associated with combinations of clinical, surgical, and molecular factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joanna Baum
- Department of Gynecology, European Competence Center for Ovarian Cancer, Campus Virchow Klinikum, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany.,Tumorbank Ovarian Cancer Network, Berlin, Germany
| | - Elena Ioana Braicu
- Department of Gynecology, European Competence Center for Ovarian Cancer, Campus Virchow Klinikum, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany.,Tumorbank Ovarian Cancer Network, Berlin, Germany
| | - Oliver Hunsicker
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, CCM / CVK Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Ignace Vergote
- Tumorbank Ovarian Cancer Network, Berlin, Germany.,Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Leuven Cancer Institute, University Hospital Leuven, Catholic University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Nicole Concin
- Tumorbank Ovarian Cancer Network, Berlin, Germany.,Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Els Van Nieuwenhuysen
- Tumorbank Ovarian Cancer Network, Berlin, Germany.,Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Leuven Cancer Institute, University Hospital Leuven, Catholic University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Aarne Feldheiser
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, CCM / CVK Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Patriciu Achimas-Cadariu
- Tumorbank Ovarian Cancer Network, Berlin, Germany.,Department of Surgical and Gynecological Oncology, The Oncology Institute Cluj-Napoca, University of Medicine and Pharmacy Iuliu Hatieganu Cluj-Napoca, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - Silvia Darb-Esfahani
- Tumorbank Ovarian Cancer Network, Berlin, Germany.,Institute of Pathology, Charite Universitatsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Astrid Berger
- Tumorbank Ovarian Cancer Network, Berlin, Germany.,Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Bogdan Fetica
- Tumorbank Ovarian Cancer Network, Berlin, Germany.,Department of Pathology, Oncology Institute Prof Dr Ion Chiricuta, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - Sven Mahner
- Tumorbank Ovarian Cancer Network, Berlin, Germany.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.,Department of Gynecology, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Andrea Papadia
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of the Italian Switzerland (USI), Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale of Lugano, Lugano, Switzerland.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital of Bern and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Linn Wölber
- Tumorbank Ovarian Cancer Network, Berlin, Germany.,Department of Gynecology, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Maria Luisa Gasparri
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of the Italian Switzerland (USI), Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale of Lugano, Lugano, Switzerland.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital of Bern and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Adriaan Vanderstichele
- Tumorbank Ovarian Cancer Network, Berlin, Germany.,Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Leuven Cancer Institute, University Hospital Leuven, Catholic University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | | | - Michael D Mueller
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital of Bern and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Ilary Ruscito
- Department of Gynecology, European Competence Center for Ovarian Cancer, Campus Virchow Klinikum, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany.,Gynecology Division, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences and Translational Medicine, Sant'Andrea University Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Hannah Woopen
- Department of Gynecology, European Competence Center for Ovarian Cancer, Campus Virchow Klinikum, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany.,Tumorbank Ovarian Cancer Network, Berlin, Germany
| | - Jalid Sehouli
- Department of Gynecology, European Competence Center for Ovarian Cancer, Campus Virchow Klinikum, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany .,Tumorbank Ovarian Cancer Network, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Yamamoto M, Yoshida M, Furuse J, Sano K, Ohtsuka M, Yamashita S, Beppu T, Iwashita Y, Wada K, Nakajima TE, Sakamoto K, Hayano K, Mori Y, Asai K, Matsuyama R, Hirashita T, Hibi T, Sakai N, Tabata T, Kawakami H, Takeda H, Mizukami T, Ozaka M, Ueno M, Naito Y, Okano N, Ueno T, Hijioka S, Shikata S, Ukai T, Strasberg S, Sarr MG, Jagannath P, Hwang TL, Han HS, Yoon YS, Wang HJ, Luo SC, Adam R, Gimenez M, Scatton O, Oh DY, Takada T. Clinical practice guidelines for the management of liver metastases from extrahepatic primary cancers 2021. JOURNAL OF HEPATO-BILIARY-PANCREATIC SCIENCES 2020; 28:1-25. [PMID: 33200538 DOI: 10.1002/jhbp.868] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2020] [Revised: 10/30/2020] [Accepted: 11/08/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hepatectomy is standard treatment for colorectal liver metastases; however, it is unclear whether liver metastases from other primary cancers should be resected or not. The Japanese Society of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery therefore created clinical practice guidelines for the management of metastatic liver tumors. METHODS Eight primary diseases were selected based on the number of hepatectomies performed for each malignancy per year. Clinical questions were structured in the population, intervention, comparison, and outcomes (PICO) format. Systematic reviews were performed, and the strength of recommendations and the level of quality of evidence for each clinical question were discussed and determined. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach was used to assess evidence and make recommendations. RESULTS The eight primary sites were grouped into five categories based on suggested indications for hepatectomy and consensus of the guidelines committee. Fourteen clinical questions were devised, covering five topics: (1) diagnosis, (2) operative treatment, (3) ablation therapy, (4) the eight primary diseases, and (5) systemic therapies. The grade of recommendation was strong for one clinical question and weak for the other 13 clinical questions. The quality of the evidence was moderate for two questions, low for 10, and very low for two. A flowchart was made to summarize the outcomes of the guidelines for the indications of hepatectomy and systemic therapy. CONCLUSIONS These guidelines were developed to provide useful information based on evidence in the published literature for the clinical management of liver metastases, and they could be helpful for conducting future clinical trials to provide higher-quality evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Masakazu Yamamoto
- Department of Surgery, Institute of Gastroenterology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Masahiro Yoshida
- Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic and Gastrointestinal Surgery, International University of Health and Welfare, School of Medicine, Ichikawa, Japan
| | - Junji Furuse
- Department of Medical Oncology, Kyorin University Faculty of Medicine, Mitaka, Japan
| | - Keiji Sano
- Department of Surgery, Teikyo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Masayuki Ohtsuka
- Department of General Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan
| | - Shingo Yamashita
- Department of Surgery, Institute of Gastroenterology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Toru Beppu
- Department of Surgery, Yamaga City Medical Center, Kumamoto, Japan
| | - Yukio Iwashita
- Department of Gastroenterological and Pediatric Surgery, Oita University Faculty of Medicine, Oita, Japan
| | - Keita Wada
- Department of Surgery, Teikyo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takako Eguchi Nakajima
- Department of Clinical Oncology, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, Kawasaki, Japan.,Kyoto Innovation Center for Next Generation Clinical Trials and iPS Cell Therapy, Kyoto University Hospital, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Katsunori Sakamoto
- Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic and Breast Surgery, Ehime University Graduate School of Medicine, Ehime, Japan
| | - Koichi Hayano
- Department of Frontier Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan
| | - Yasuhisa Mori
- Department of Surgery and Oncology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Koji Asai
- Department of Surgery, Toho University Ohashi Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Ryusei Matsuyama
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokoama, Japan
| | - Teijiro Hirashita
- Department of Gastroenterological and Pediatric Surgery, Oita University Faculty of Medicine, Oita, Japan
| | - Taizo Hibi
- Department of Pediatric Surgery and Transplantation, Kumamoto University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto, Japan
| | - Nozomu Sakai
- Department of General Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan
| | - Tsutomu Tabata
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hisato Kawakami
- Department of Medical Oncology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka-Sayama, Osaka, Japan
| | - Hiroyuki Takeda
- Department of Clinical Oncology, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, Kawasaki, Japan
| | - Takuro Mizukami
- Department of Clinical Oncology, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, Kawasaki, Japan
| | - Masato Ozaka
- Department of Gastroenterology, Cancer Institute Hospital of the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Makoto Ueno
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Medical Oncology, Kanagawa Cancer Center, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Yoichi Naito
- Department of Breast and Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan
| | - Naohiro Okano
- Department of Medical Oncology, Kyorin University Faculty of Medicine, Mitaka, Japan
| | - Takayuki Ueno
- Breast Surgical Oncology, Cancer Institute Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Susumu Hijioka
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | - Tomohiko Ukai
- Division of Public Health, Osaka Institute of Public Health, Higashinari, Japan
| | - Steven Strasberg
- Section of HPB Surgery, Department of Surgery, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | | | | | - Tsann-Long Hwang
- Division of General Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Ho-Seong Han
- Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Yoo-Seok Yoon
- Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | | | - Shao-Ciao Luo
- Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - René Adam
- AP HP Paul Brousse Hospital, University Paris Sud, Villejuif, France
| | - Mariano Gimenez
- Docencia Asistencia Investigación en Cirugía Invasiva Mínima Foundation, General and Minimally Invasive Surgery, University of Buenos Aires, Viamonte, Argentina.,Institute of Image-Guided Surgery, Strasbourg, France
| | - Olivier Scatton
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, APHP Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Sorbonne Université, CRSA, Paris, France
| | - Do-Youn Oh
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Tadahiro Takada
- Department of Surgery, Teikyo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Llueca A, Serra A, Climent MT, Segarra B, Maazouzi Y, Soriano M, Escrig J. Outcome quality standards in advanced ovarian cancer surgery. World J Surg Oncol 2020; 18:309. [PMID: 33239057 PMCID: PMC7690155 DOI: 10.1186/s12957-020-02064-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2020] [Accepted: 10/26/2020] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Advanced ovarian cancer surgery (AOCS) frequently results in serious postoperative complications. Because managing AOCS is difficult, some standards need to be established that allow surgeons to assess the quality of treatment provided and consider what aspects should improve. This study aimed to identify quality indicators (QIs) of clinical relevance and to establish their acceptable quality limits (i.e., standard) in AOCS. MATERIALS AND METHODS We performed a systematic search on clinical practice guidelines, consensus conferences, and reviews on the outcome and quality of AOCS to identify which QIs have clinical relevance in AOCS. We then searched the literature (from January 2006 to December 2018) for each QI in combination with the keywords of advanced ovarian cancer, surgery, outcome, and oncology. Standards for each QI were determined by statistical process control techniques. The acceptable quality limits for each QI were defined as being within the limits of the 99.8% interval, which indicated a favorable outcome. RESULTS A total of 38 studies were included. The QIs selected for AOCS were complete removal of the tumor upon visual inspection (complete cytoreductive surgery), a residual tumor of < 1 cm (optimal cytoreductive surgery), a residual tumor of > 1 cm (suboptimal cytoreductive surgery), major morbidity, and 5-year survival. The rates of complete cytoreductive surgery, optimal cytoreductive surgery, suboptimal cytoreductive surgery, morbidity, and 5-year survival had quality limits of < 27%, < 23%, > 39%, > 33%, and < 27%, respectively. CONCLUSION Our results provide a general view of clinical indicators for AOCS. Acceptable quality limits that can be considered as standards were established.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antoni Llueca
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University General Hospital of Castellón, Av Benicasim s/n, 12004, Castellón, Spain. .,Multidisciplinary Unit of Abdominal Pelvic Oncology Surgery (MUAPOS), University General Hospital of Castellón, Av Benicasim s/n, 12004, Castellón, Spain. .,Department of Medicine, University Jaume I (UJI), Castellón, Spain.
| | - Anna Serra
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University General Hospital of Castellón, Av Benicasim s/n, 12004, Castellón, Spain.,Multidisciplinary Unit of Abdominal Pelvic Oncology Surgery (MUAPOS), University General Hospital of Castellón, Av Benicasim s/n, 12004, Castellón, Spain.,Department of Medicine, University Jaume I (UJI), Castellón, Spain
| | - Maria Teresa Climent
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University General Hospital of Castellón, Av Benicasim s/n, 12004, Castellón, Spain.,Multidisciplinary Unit of Abdominal Pelvic Oncology Surgery (MUAPOS), University General Hospital of Castellón, Av Benicasim s/n, 12004, Castellón, Spain.,Department of Medicine, University Jaume I (UJI), Castellón, Spain
| | - Blanca Segarra
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University General Hospital of Castellón, Av Benicasim s/n, 12004, Castellón, Spain.,Multidisciplinary Unit of Abdominal Pelvic Oncology Surgery (MUAPOS), University General Hospital of Castellón, Av Benicasim s/n, 12004, Castellón, Spain
| | - Yasmine Maazouzi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University General Hospital of Castellón, Av Benicasim s/n, 12004, Castellón, Spain.,Multidisciplinary Unit of Abdominal Pelvic Oncology Surgery (MUAPOS), University General Hospital of Castellón, Av Benicasim s/n, 12004, Castellón, Spain
| | - Marta Soriano
- Multidisciplinary Unit of Abdominal Pelvic Oncology Surgery (MUAPOS), University General Hospital of Castellón, Av Benicasim s/n, 12004, Castellón, Spain.,Department of Anesthesiology, University General Hospital of Castellón, Av Benicasim s/n, 12004, Castellón, Spain
| | - Javier Escrig
- Multidisciplinary Unit of Abdominal Pelvic Oncology Surgery (MUAPOS), University General Hospital of Castellón, Av Benicasim s/n, 12004, Castellón, Spain.,Department of Medicine, University Jaume I (UJI), Castellón, Spain.,Department of General Surgery, University General Hospital of Castellón, Av Benicasim s/n, 12004, Castellón, Spain
| | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Khatib G, Seyfettinoglu S, Guzel AB, Gulec UK, Unlugenc H, Vardar MA. Feasibility and rationale of a novel approach in advanced ovarian cancer surgery: Bat- shaped en-bloc total peritonectomy and total hysterectomy salpingo-oophorectomy with or without rectosigmoid resection (Sarta-Bat approach). Gynecol Oncol 2020; 161:97-103. [PMID: 33234261 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.11.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2020] [Accepted: 11/11/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the feasibility of bat-shaped en-bloc total peritonectomy and total hysterectomy-salpingo-oophorectomy with or without rectosigmoid resection as a novel approach in advanced ovarian cancer surgery. METHODS Advanced ovarian cancer patients with widespread peritoneal implants requiring total peritonectomy were the subject of the study. Thirteen cases were operated with Sarta-Bat approach between February 2019 and July 2020. Patients' clinical and surgical data were collected and statistically analyzed. RESULTS Median age of the patients was 52 (40-65). Histopathology of the tumors were high-grade serous carcinoma in 12 (92.3%) and carcinosarcoma in one (7.7%) cases and all of them originated from the ovary. Eight (61.5%), two (15.4%) and three (23.1%) patients were stage 3c, 4a, and 4b, respectively. Upper abdomen was involved in all cases. Nine cases underwent primary cytoreductive and four cases interval cytoreductive surgery. Sarta-Bat approach was performed as en-bloc total peritonectomy, total hysterectomy bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy with rectosigmoid resection in three and without rectosigmoid resection in 10 cases. Final surgery resulted in complete cytoreduction (no macroscopic residual) in all cases, with acceptable grade 2-3 morbidity rates. CONCLUSION Sarta-Bat approach is a feasible and convenient technique for cytoreductive surgery of advanced ovarian cancer with disseminated peritoneal metastases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ghanim Khatib
- Faculty of Medicine, Gynecologic Oncology Department, Cukurova University, Turkey.
| | - Sevtap Seyfettinoglu
- Faculty of Medicine, Gynecologic Oncology Department, Cukurova University, Turkey
| | - Ahmet Baris Guzel
- Faculty of Medicine, Gynecologic Oncology Department, Cukurova University, Turkey
| | - Umran Kucukgoz Gulec
- Faculty of Medicine, Gynecologic Oncology Department, Cukurova University, Turkey
| | - Hakkı Unlugenc
- Faculty of Medicine, Anesthesiology Department, Cukurova University, Turkey.
| | - Mehmet Ali Vardar
- Faculty of Medicine, Gynecologic Oncology Department, Cukurova University, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Di Donato V, Giannini A, D'Oria O, Schiavi MC, Di Pinto A, Fischetti M, Lecce F, Perniola G, Battaglia F, Berloco P, Muzii L, Benedetti Panici P. Hepatobiliary Disease Resection in Patients with Advanced Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: Prognostic Role and Optimal Cytoreduction. Ann Surg Oncol 2020; 28:222-230. [PMID: 32779050 PMCID: PMC7752869 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-020-08989-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2019] [Accepted: 05/31/2020] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
Objective The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and safety in terms of prognostic significance and perioperative morbidity and mortality of cytoreduction in patients affected by advance ovarian cancer and hepato-biliary metastasis. Methods Patients with a least one hepatobiliary metastasis who have undergone surgical treatment with curative intent of were considered for the study. Perioperative complications were evaluated and graded with Accordion severity Classification. Five-year PFS and OS were estimated using the Kaplan–Meier curve. Results Sixty-seven (20.9%) patients had at least one metastasis to the liver, biliary tract, or porta hepatis. Forty-four (65.7%) and 23 (34.3%) patients underwent respectively high and intermediate complexity surgery according. Complete cytoreduction was achieved in 48 (71.6%) patients with hepato-biliary disease. In two patients (2.9%) severe complications related to hepatobiliary surgery were reported. The median PFS for the patients with hepato-biliary involvement (RT = 0 vs. RT > 0) was 19 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 16.2–21.8] and 8 months (95% CI 6.1–9.9). The median OS for the patients with hepato-biliary involvement (RT = 0 vs. RT > 0) 45 months (95% CI 21.2–68.8 months) and 23 months (95% CI 13.9–32.03). Conclusions Hepatobiliary involvement is often associated with high tumor load and could require high complex multivisceral surgery. In selected patients complete cytoreduction could offer survival benefits. Morbidity related to hepatobiliary procedures is acceptable. Careful evaluation of patients and multidisciplinary approach in referral centers is mandatory. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1245/s10434-020-08989-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Violante Di Donato
- Department of Maternal and Child Health and Urological Sciences, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Umberto I Hospital, Rome, Italy.
| | - Andrea Giannini
- Department of Maternal and Child Health and Urological Sciences, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Umberto I Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Ottavia D'Oria
- Department of Maternal and Child Health and Urological Sciences, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Umberto I Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Michele Carlo Schiavi
- Department of Maternal and Child Health and Urological Sciences, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Umberto I Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Anna Di Pinto
- Department of Maternal and Child Health and Urological Sciences, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Umberto I Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Margherita Fischetti
- Department of Maternal and Child Health and Urological Sciences, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Umberto I Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Francesca Lecce
- Department of Maternal and Child Health and Urological Sciences, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Umberto I Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Giorgia Perniola
- Department of Maternal and Child Health and Urological Sciences, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Umberto I Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Francesco Battaglia
- Department Obstetrics and Gynecological Hospital Santa Maria Goretti of Latina, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Pasquale Berloco
- Department of General Surgery and Organ Transplantation, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Ludovico Muzii
- Department of Maternal and Child Health and Urological Sciences, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Umberto I Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Pierluigi Benedetti Panici
- Department of Maternal and Child Health and Urological Sciences, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Umberto I Hospital, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Dottino JA, He W, Sun CC, Zhao H, Fu S, Rauh-Hain JA, Suidan RS, Lu KH, Giordano SH, Meyer LA. National trends in bowel and upper abdominal procedures in ovarian cancer surgery. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2020; 30:1195-1202. [PMID: 32616627 DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2020-001243] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2020] [Revised: 04/24/2020] [Accepted: 04/29/2020] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES In the United States, trends in the initial treatment approach for ovarian cancer reflect a shift in paradigm toward the increased use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and interval cytoreductive surgery. The aim of this study was to evaluate the trends in surgical cytoreductive procedures in ovarian cancer patients who underwent either primary or interval cytoreductive surgery. METHODS This retrospective, population-based study examined patients with stage III/IV ovarian cancer diagnosed between January 2000 and December 2013 identified using SEER-Medicare. Small or large bowel resection, ostomy creation, and upper abdominal procedures were identified using relevant billing codes and compared over time. A 1:1 primary and interval cytoreductive propensity matched cohort was created using demographic and clinical variables. 30-day complications and the use of acute care services were compared. RESULTS A total of 5417 women were identified. 34% underwent bowel resections, 16% ostomy creation, and 8% upper abdominal procedures. There was an increase in bowel resections and upper abdominal procedures from 2000 to 2013 in patients who underwent primary cytoreductive surgery. Compared with patients who received primary cytoreduction, patients who underwent interval cytoreductive surgery were less likely to undergo bowel resection (OR=0.50; 95% CI [0.41, 0.61]) or ostomy creation (OR=0.48; 95% CI [0.42, 0.56]). Upper abdominal procedures did not differ between groups. For patients who underwent primary cytoreductive surgery, these procedures were associated with intensive care unit stay (4.6% vs <2%, P<0.01). In both primary and interval cytoreductive surgery patients, the receipt of bowel and upper abdominal procedures was associated with multiple 30-day postoperative complications and higher rates of readmission and emergency room visits. CONCLUSIONS The performance of upper abdominal procedures in ovarian cancer patients increased from 2000 to 2013. Interval cytoreductive surgery was associated with decreased likelihood of bowel surgery. In matched primary and interval cytoreductive surgery cohorts, the receipt of these procedures were associated with the increased likelihood of postoperative complications and use of acute care services.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph A Dottino
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Weiguo He
- Department of Health Services Research, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Charlotte C Sun
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Hui Zhao
- Department of Health Services Research, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Shuangshuang Fu
- Department of Health Services Research, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Jose Alejandro Rauh-Hain
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Rudy S Suidan
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Karen H Lu
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Sharon H Giordano
- Department of Health Services Research, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Larissa A Meyer
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Luna-Abanto J, García Ruiz L, Laura Martinez J, Álvarez Larraondo M, Villoslada Terrones V. Liver Resection as Part of Cytoreductive Surgery for Ovarian Cancer. J Gynecol Surg 2020; 36:70-75. [PMID: 32292262 PMCID: PMC7153635 DOI: 10.1089/gyn.2019.0074] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective: The aim of this study was to describe and evaluate the safety of hepatic resections for ovarian cancer liver metastases and the benefit in terms of survival as part of cytoreductive surgery among peritoneal seeding and parenchymal metastases. Materials and Methods: Data were reviewed retrospectively from patients who underwent liver resection as part of cytoreductive surgery for ovarian cancer at the Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplásicas, in Lima, Perú, from January 2009 to December 2017. Results: From January 2009 to December 2017, 1211 patients underwent surgical cytoreduction for ovarian cancer; 39 of these patients had liver resection as part of their surgical treatment, with 9, 17, and 13 patients receiving primary, secondary, and tertiary, resections, respectively. The mean age of the patients was 46, the majority (87%) had stage III/IV ovarian cancer. In addition, 21 patients had parenchymal metastasis resections, and 95% of the patients had Dindo–Clavien I and II grade complications. The 30-day mortality rate was 0. Conclusions: Liver resection for advanced ovarian cancer is a safe procedure for primary up to quaternary cytoreduction and may confer survival benefits to patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jorge Luna-Abanto
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplásicas, Lima, Perú
| | - Luis García Ruiz
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplásicas, Lima, Perú
| | - Jheff Laura Martinez
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplásicas, Lima, Perú
| | | | - Vladimir Villoslada Terrones
- Department of Gynecology Oncology, Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplásicas, Lima, Perú.,School of Human Medicine, National University of Cajamarca, Cajamarca, Perú
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Magrina JF, Magtibay PM. Robotic Resection of Diaphragm Metastases in Ovarian Cancer: Technical Aspects. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2020; 27:1417-1422. [PMID: 31917330 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2019.12.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2019] [Revised: 12/23/2019] [Accepted: 12/27/2019] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
Diaphragm metastases in ovarian cancer can be safely resected robotically in selected patients. The technique is similar to laparotomy, whether it is a peritoneal or full-thickness excision. Trocar placement is very important for successful resection and is dependent on the location of the disease. Metastases involving the left diaphragm and the ventral aspect of the right diaphragm are accessed with trocars placed slightly cranial to the umbilicus. Metastases in the dorsal aspect of the right diaphragm are removed with trocars in the upper quadrants. Metastases located in the lateral portion of the right diaphragm are excised using an infrahepatic approach, and those in the medial aspect are removed using a suprahepatic approach. In peritoneal resection, monopolar instruments must be kept at 10 W to 15 W to prevent contraction of the diaphragm and pleural perforation. Intraoperative pleural decompression is performed via an aspirating catheter. A video of the technique described in this report is available online (Supplementary Video 1).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Javier F Magrina
- Department of Medical and Surgical Gynecology, Mayo Clinic Hospital, Phoenix, Arizona (all authors)..
| | - Paul M Magtibay
- Department of Medical and Surgical Gynecology, Mayo Clinic Hospital, Phoenix, Arizona (all authors)
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Di Donato V, Bardhi E, Tramontano L, Capomacchia FM, Palaia I, Perniola G, Plotti F, Angioli R, Giancotti A, Muzii L, Panici PB. Management of morbidity associated with pancreatic resection during cytoreductive surgery for epithelial ovarian cancer: A systematic review. Eur J Surg Oncol 2019; 46:694-702. [PMID: 31806515 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2019.11.516] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2019] [Revised: 11/09/2019] [Accepted: 11/18/2019] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION In ovarian cancer (OC), survival benefit in case of complete cytoreduction with absence of residual tumor has been clearly demonstrated; however, it often requires extensive surgery. Particularly, pancreatic resection during cytoreduction, may severely impact perioperative morbidity and mortality. OBJECTIVES The aim of this systematic review is to evaluate complication rates and related optimal management of ovarian cancer patients undergoing pancreatic resection as part of cytoreductive surgery. METHODS Literature was searched for relevant records reporting distal pancreatectomy for advanced ovarian cancer. All cohorts were rated for quality. We focused our analysis on complications related to pancreatic surgical procedures evaluating the following outcomes: pancreatic fistula (PF), abdominal abscess, pancreatitis, iatrogenic diabetes, hemorrhage from splenic vessels and pancreatic-surgery-related mortality. RESULTS The most frequent complication reported was PF. Similar rates of PF were reported after hand-sewn (20%) or stapled closure (24%). Continued drainage is the standard treatment, and often, the leak can be managed conservatively and does not require re-intervention. Abdominal abscess is the second most frequent complication and generally follows a non-adequately drained PF and often required re-laparotomy. Pancreatitis is a rare event that could be treated conservatively; however, death can occur in case of necrotic evolution. Cases of post-operative hemorrhage due to splenic vessel bleeding have been described and represent an emergency. CONCLUSIONS Knowledge of pancreatic surgery and management of possible complications ought to be present in the oncologic-gynecologic armamentarium. All patients should be referred to specialized, dedicated, tertiary centers in order to reduce, promptly recognize and optimally manage complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Violante Di Donato
- Department of Maternal and Child Health and Urological Sciences, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Policlinico Umberto I, Viale Del Policlinico 155, 00161, Rome, Italy
| | - Erlisa Bardhi
- Department of Maternal and Child Health and Urological Sciences, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Policlinico Umberto I, Viale Del Policlinico 155, 00161, Rome, Italy.
| | - Luca Tramontano
- Department of Maternal and Child Health and Urological Sciences, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Policlinico Umberto I, Viale Del Policlinico 155, 00161, Rome, Italy
| | - Filippo Maria Capomacchia
- Department of Maternal and Child Health and Urological Sciences, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Policlinico Umberto I, Viale Del Policlinico 155, 00161, Rome, Italy
| | - Innocenza Palaia
- Department of Maternal and Child Health and Urological Sciences, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Policlinico Umberto I, Viale Del Policlinico 155, 00161, Rome, Italy
| | - Giorgia Perniola
- Department of Maternal and Child Health and Urological Sciences, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Policlinico Umberto I, Viale Del Policlinico 155, 00161, Rome, Italy
| | - Francesco Plotti
- Department of Gynecology, University of Rome "Campus Bio-Medico", Via Álvaro Del Portillo, 21, 00128, Rome, Italy
| | - Roberto Angioli
- Department of Gynecology, University of Rome "Campus Bio-Medico", Via Álvaro Del Portillo, 21, 00128, Rome, Italy
| | - Antonella Giancotti
- Department of Maternal and Child Health and Urological Sciences, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Policlinico Umberto I, Viale Del Policlinico 155, 00161, Rome, Italy
| | - Ludovico Muzii
- Department of Maternal and Child Health and Urological Sciences, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Policlinico Umberto I, Viale Del Policlinico 155, 00161, Rome, Italy
| | - Pierluigi Benedetti Panici
- Department of Maternal and Child Health and Urological Sciences, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Policlinico Umberto I, Viale Del Policlinico 155, 00161, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Minimally Invasive Surgery for Resection of Diaphragm Metastases in Ovarian Cancer. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2019; 26:1268-1272. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2018.12.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2018] [Revised: 12/03/2018] [Accepted: 12/04/2018] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
|
27
|
Gurkan D, Ceren Akin A, Sahin H, Aytac Tohma Y, Sahin EA, Gunakan E, Iflazoglu N, Nihan Haberal A, Ayhan A. Oncologic outcomes in patients undergoing maximal or optimal cytoreductive surgery for Stage 3C serous ovarian, tubal or peritoneal carcinomas. J OBSTET GYNAECOL 2019; 40:551-557. [PMID: 31482736 DOI: 10.1080/01443615.2019.1634028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
The aim of this study was to evaluate overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) of patients with Stage 3C serous ovarian, tubal and peritoneal carcinomas. A retrospective analysis of 111 patients who underwent maximal or optimal cytoreductive surgery was performed. Patients were divided into three groups as ovarian cancer (n = 47), tubal cancer (n = 24) and peritoneal cancer (n = 40). Median follow-up was 30 months. There was no significant difference in DFS and OS among the groups. Complete cytoreduction was an independent prognostic factor for DFS in all groups (HR 2.3, 95% CI 1.14-4.93; p=.020). Positive peritoneal cytology (HR 2.2, 95% CI 1.02-4.78; p=.044), and retroperitoneal lymph node involvement (HR 2.3, 95% CI1.11-4.89; p=.025) were independent risk factors for decreased OS, and extended cytoreduction (HR 2.7, 95% CI 1.05-6.99; p=.039) were independent risk factors for increased OS. In conclusion, these malignancies should be considered a single entity during treatment.IMPACT STATEMENTWhat is already known on this subject? Epithelial ovarian cancer is the second most common gynaecological cancer in women worldwide. There are different histological types including ovarian, tubal and peritoneal carcinomas in which malignant cells form in the tissue covering the ovary or lining the fallopian tube of peritoneum. Recent data have supported the view that these malignancies should be considered a single entity and should be treated the same way.What the results of this study add? In the present study, we evaluated overall survival and disease-free survival of patients with Stage 3C ovarian, tubal and peritoneal cancer undergoing maximal or optimal cytoreductive surgery. We found similar oncologic outcomes in all patient groups. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to compare oncologic outcomes of these similar and often confused malignancies in the literature. We, therefore, believe that the present study provides additional information to the body of knowledge on this topic.What the implications are of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? This study is important, as it indicates similar oncologic outcomes in patients undergoing maximal or optimal cytoreductive surgery for Stage 3C ovarian, tubal and peritoneal cancer. Based on these findings, clinicians should keep in mind that these malignancies should be considered a single clinical entity and be treated the same way. We believe that our study would pave the way for further studies regarding this subject.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Damla Gurkan
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Baskent University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Aylin Ceren Akin
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Baskent University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Hanifi Sahin
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Malatya Education and Research Hospital, Malatya, Turkey
| | - Yusuf Aytac Tohma
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Baskent University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Eda Adeviye Sahin
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Malatya Education and Research Hospital, Malatya, Turkey
| | - Emre Gunakan
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Keçiören Education and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Nidal Iflazoglu
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Malatya Education and Research Hospital, Malatya, Turkey
| | | | - Ali Ayhan
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Baskent University, Ankara, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Timmermans M, Zwakman N, Sonke GS, Van de Vijver KK, Duk MJ, van der Aa MA, Kruitwagen RF. Perioperative change in CA125 is an independent prognostic factor for improved clinical outcome in advanced ovarian cancer. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2019; 240:364-369. [PMID: 31400565 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2019.07.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2018] [Revised: 05/25/2019] [Accepted: 07/08/2019] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Despite being the most important prognostic factor for prolonged overall survival in epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC), the measurement of residual disease is hampered by its subjective character. Additional assessment tools are needed to establish the success of cytoreductive surgery in order to predict patients' prognosis more accurately. The aim of this study is to evaluate the independent prognostic value of perioperative CA125 change in advanced stage EOC patients. STUDY DESIGN We identified all patients who underwent primary cytoreductive surgery for advanced stage (FIGO IIB-IV) EOC between 2008 and 2015, from the Netherlands Cancer Registry. The relative perioperative change in CA125 was categorized into four groups; increase, <50% decline, 50-79% decline and ≥80% decline. Overall survival (OS) was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier survival curves and multivariable cox regression models. RESULTS We included 1232 eligible patients with known pre- and postoperative CA125 serum levels. Patients with a decline of ≥80% in CA125 levels experienced improved OS compared to those with a decline of <50% (univariable Hazard Ratio (HR) 0.45, 95%CI 0.36-0.57). The prognostic effect of perioperative CA125 change was independent of patient- and treatment characteristics, such as the extent of residual disease after cytoreductive surgery (multivariable HR≥80% 0.52(0.41-0.66)). CONCLUSIONS This study shows that the perioperative change in CA125 is an independent prognostic factor for overall survival after primary surgery for EOC patients. This pleads for the use of a combined model, consisting of perioperative CA125 change and the outcome of residual disease, in order to predict the prognosis of EOC patients more accurately.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Timmermans
- Department of Research, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization (IKNL), Utrecht, the Netherlands; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands, GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
| | - N Zwakman
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, VieCuri Medical Center, Venlo, the Netherlands
| | - G S Sonke
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - K K Van de Vijver
- Department of Pathology, Ghent University Hospital, Cancer Research Institute Ghent (CRIG), Ghent, Belgium
| | - M J Duk
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Meander Medical Center, Amersfoort, the Netherlands
| | - M A van der Aa
- Department of Research, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization (IKNL), Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - R F Kruitwagen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands, GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Brown J, Drury L, Crane EK, Anderson WE, Tait DL, Higgins RV, Naumann RW. When Less Is More: Minimally Invasive Surgery Compared with Laparotomy for Interval Debulking After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Women with Advanced Ovarian Cancer. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2019; 26:902-909. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2018.09.765] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2018] [Revised: 09/07/2018] [Accepted: 09/07/2018] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
|
30
|
Timmermans M, van der Hel O, Sonke G, Van de Vijver K, van der Aa M, Kruitwagen R. The prognostic value of residual disease after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in advanced ovarian cancer; A systematic review. Gynecol Oncol 2019; 153:445-451. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2019.02.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2018] [Revised: 02/18/2019] [Accepted: 02/19/2019] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
|
31
|
Timmermans M, Sonke GS, Slangen BFM, Baalbergen A, Bekkers RLM, Fons G, Gerestein CG, Kruse AJ, Roes EM, Zusterzeel PLM, Van de Vijver KK, Kruitwagen RFPM, van der Aa MA. Outcome of surgery in advanced ovarian cancer varies between geographical regions; opportunities for improvement in The Netherlands. Eur J Surg Oncol 2019; 45:1425-1431. [PMID: 31027945 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2019.04.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2018] [Revised: 03/29/2019] [Accepted: 04/09/2019] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The care for patients with epithelial ovarian cancer(EOC) is organised in eight different geographical regions in the Netherlands. This situation allows us to study differences in practice patterns and outcomes between geographical regions for patients with FIGO stage IIIC and IV. METHODS We identified all EOC patients who were diagnosed with FIGO stage IIIC or IV between 01.01.2008 and 31.12.2015 from the Netherlands Cancer Registry. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize treatment and treatment sequence(primary cytoreductive surgery(PCS) or neoadjuvant chemotherapy and interval cytoreductive surgery(NACT-ICS)). Moreover, outcome of surgery was compared between geographical regions. Multilevel logistic regression was used to assess whether existing variation is explained by geographical region and case-mix factors. RESULTS Overall, 6,741 patients were diagnosed with FIGO IIIC or IV disease. There were no differences in the percentage of patients that received any form of treatment between the geographical regions(range 80-86%, P = 0.162). In patients that received cytoreductive surgery and chemotherapy, a significant variation between the geographical regions was observed in the use of PCS and NACT-ICS(PCS: 24-48%, P < 0.001). The percentage of complete cytoreductive surgeries after PCS ranged from 10 to 59%(P < 0.001) and after NACT-ICS from 37 to 70%(P < 0.001). Moreover, geographical region was independently associated with the outcome of surgery, also when adjusted for treatment sequence(P < 0.001). CONCLUSION We observed a significant variation in treatment approach for advanced EOC between geographical regions in the Netherlands. Furthermore, the probability to achieve no residual disease differed significantly between regions, regardless of treatment sequence. This may suggest that surgical outcomes can be improved across geographical regions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Timmermans
- Department of Research, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization (IKNL), Utrecht, the Netherlands; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands; GROW, School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
| | - G S Sonke
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - B F M Slangen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands; GROW, School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - A Baalbergen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Reinier de Graaf Hospital, Delft, the Netherlands
| | - R L M Bekkers
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | - G Fons
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - C G Gerestein
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Meander Medical Centre, Amersfoort, the Netherlands
| | - A J Kruse
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands; GROW, School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht, the Netherlands; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Isala Hospital, Zwolle, the Netherlands
| | - E M Roes
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - P L M Zusterzeel
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - K K Van de Vijver
- Department of Pathology, Ghent University Hospital, Cancer Research Institute Ghent (CRIG), Ghent, Belgium
| | - R F P M Kruitwagen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands; GROW, School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - M A van der Aa
- Department of Research, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization (IKNL), Utrecht, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Wang M, Zhou J, Zhang L, Zhao Y, Zhang N, Wang L, Zhu W, He X, Zhu H, Xu W, Pan Q, Mao A, Li Q, Wang L. Surgical treatment of ovarian cancer liver metastasis. Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr 2019; 8:129-137. [PMID: 31098360 DOI: 10.21037/hbsn.2018.12.06] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
In addition to hepatocellular carcinoma, metastatic liver cancer (MLC) is another focus of hepatic surgeon. Good outcome of patients with liver metastasis (LM) from colorectal cancer or neuroendocrine tumor have been achieved. Ovarian cancer liver metastasis (OCLM) has its unique oncological characteristics and a variety of metastasis patterns, which brings a challenge to hepatic surgeon. Hepatic surgeons hold different views and techniques from gynecologists, which makes differences in the evaluation and treatment of the disease. We reviewed recent studies and, in combination with our own clinical experience, attempted to introduce the progress of surgical treatment of liver metastases from OC. In our experience, both preoperative imaging and surgical procedures are based on the assurance of R0 resection. R0 cytoreductive surgery (CRS) is the most favorable determinant for the prognosis of OC patients, and R0 liver resection (LR) is a component of R0 CRS. Gynecologists and hepatic surgeons should do their own preoperative and intraoperative evaluation for the extrahepatic and intrahepatic metastasis respectively. During the operation, regardless of the miliary nodules dissemination between the right hemidiaphragm and liver capsule, liver parenchymal infiltration (LPI) or liver parenchymal metastasis (LPM), 1-2 cm resection margin should be emphasized. For patients with liver portal lymph node metastasis (LPLNM), hepatic portal skeletonization should be performed, rather than portal lymph node dissection. The operation should be as radical as possible to ensure the patients to achieve good prognosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Miao Wang
- Department of Hepatic Surgery, Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China
| | - Jiamin Zhou
- Department of Hepatic Surgery, Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China
| | - Lyu Zhang
- Research Center for Translational Medicine, Shanghai East Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200120, China
| | - Yiming Zhao
- Department of Hepatic Surgery, Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China
| | - Ning Zhang
- Department of Hepatic Surgery, Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China
| | - Longrong Wang
- Department of Hepatic Surgery, Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China
| | - Weiping Zhu
- Department of Hepatic Surgery, Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China
| | - Xigan He
- Department of Hepatic Surgery, Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China
| | - Hongxu Zhu
- Department of Hepatic Surgery, Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China
| | - Weiqi Xu
- Department of Hepatic Surgery, Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China
| | - Qi Pan
- Department of Hepatic Surgery, Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China
| | - Anrong Mao
- Department of Hepatic Surgery, Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China
| | - Qinchuan Li
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Shanghai East Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200120, China
| | - Lu Wang
- Department of Hepatic Surgery, Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Angeles MA, Ferron G, Cabarrou B, Balague G, Martínez-Gómez C, Gladieff L, Pomel C, Martinez A. Prognostic impact of celiac lymph node involvement in patients after frontline treatment for advanced ovarian cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 2019; 45:1410-1416. [PMID: 30857876 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2019.02.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2018] [Revised: 02/09/2019] [Accepted: 02/14/2019] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Completeness of cytoreduction is the most important prognostic factor in patients with advanced ovarian cancer (OC). Extensive upper abdominal surgery has allowed to increase the rate complete cytoreduction and the feasibility of resection of celiac lymph nodes (CLN) and porta hepatis disease in these patients has been demonstrated. The aim of our study was to assess the prognostic impact of CLN involvement in patients with primary advanced OC undergoing a complete cytoreductive surgery (CRS). MATERIAL AND METHODS We designed a retrospective unicentric study. We reviewed data from patients who underwent CLN resection with or without porta hepatis disease resection, within upfront or interval complete CRS in the frontline treatment of advanced epithelial OC between January 2008 and December 2015. Patients were classified in two groups according to CLN status. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted. Survival rates were estimated using Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS Forty-three patients were included and positive CLN were found in 39.5% of them. The median disease-free survival in the group of patients with positive and negative CLN were 11.3 months and 25.8 months, respectively. In multivariable analysis, both CLN involvement and high peritoneal cancer index were independently associated with decreased disease-free survival. Computed tomography re-reading by an expert radiologist has good sensitivity for detection of positive CLN. CONCLUSION CLN involvement and high preoperative tumor burden are independently associated with decreased survival after complete cytoreduction for OC. CLN involvement is a marker of diffuse disease and an independent risk factor for early recurrent disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martina Aida Angeles
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Institut Claudius Regaud, Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse (IUCT), Oncopole, Toulouse, France
| | - Gwénaël Ferron
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Institut Claudius Regaud, Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse (IUCT), Oncopole, Toulouse, France; INSERM CRCT 19, Toulouse, France
| | - Bastien Cabarrou
- Biostatistics Unit, Institut Claudius Regaud, Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse (IUCT), Oncopole, Toulouse, France
| | - Gisèle Balague
- Department of Radiology, Institut Claudius Regaud, Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse (IUCT), Oncopole, Toulouse, France
| | - Carlos Martínez-Gómez
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Institut Claudius Regaud, Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse (IUCT), Oncopole, Toulouse, France; INSERM CRCT 1, Toulouse, France
| | - Laurence Gladieff
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Claudius Regaud, Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse (IUCT), Oncopole, Toulouse, France
| | - Christophe Pomel
- Department of Surgical Oncology, CRLCC Jean Perrin, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Alejandra Martinez
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Institut Claudius Regaud, Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse (IUCT), Oncopole, Toulouse, France; INSERM CRCT 1, Toulouse, France.
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Pattern and impact of metastatic cardiophrenic lymph nodes in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2018; 152:76-81. [PMID: 30463683 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.11.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2018] [Revised: 11/01/2018] [Accepted: 11/03/2018] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cardiophrenic lymph nodes (CPLN) define FIGO stage IVB disease. We evaluate the pattern of CPLN metastases, their prognostic impact and the potential role of CPLN resection in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). METHODS Analysis of 595 consecutive patients with EOC treated in the period 01/2011-05/2016. CT scans were re-reviewed by two radiologists. Positive CPLN were defined as ≥5 mm in the short-axis diameter. The role of CPLN resection was evaluated in a case-control matched-pair analysis. RESULTS Of 595 patients 458 had FIGO stage IIIB-IV disease. We excluded patients undergoing interval surgery (n = 54), without debulking surgery (n = 32) and without sufficient pre-operative imaging (n = 22), resulting in a study cohort of 350 patients. Of these, 133 (37.9%) had negative CPLN and 217 (62.0%) had radiologically positive CPLN. In patients with postoperative residual tumor, enlarged CPLN had no impact on survival. In patients with complete resection (n = 223), 98 (44.0%) had negative CPLN and a 5-year OS of 69% and a 5-year PFS of 41%; in contrast, in the 125 patients (56.0%) with positive CPLN, 5-year OS was 30% and 5-year PFS was 13%. In 52 patients we resected CPLN. The matched-pair case-control analysis did not demonstrate any significant impact on survival of CPLN resection. CONCLUSION CPLN metastases are associated with impaired PFS and OS in patients with macroscopically completely resected tumor. Intraabdominal residual tumor has a greater prognostic impact than positive CPLN. The impact of the resection of CPLN remains unclear.
Collapse
|
35
|
Arora V, Somashekhar S. Essential surgical skills for a gynecologic oncologist. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2018; 143 Suppl 2:118-130. [DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.12619] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Vivek Arora
- Royal Hospital for Women; University of New South Wales Randwick; Sydney Australia
| | - S.P. Somashekhar
- Manipal Comprehensive Cancer Center; Manipal Hospital; Bangalore India
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Eng OS, Raoof M, Blakely AM, Yu X, Lee SJ, Han ES, Wakabayashi MT, Yuh B, Lee B, Dellinger TH. A collaborative surgical approach to upper and lower abdominal cytoreductive surgery in ovarian cancer. J Surg Oncol 2018; 118:121-126. [PMID: 29878375 DOI: 10.1002/jso.25120] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2018] [Accepted: 05/07/2018] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Cytoreductive surgery with complete macroscopic resection in patients with ovarian cancer is associated with improved survival. Institutional reports of combined upper and lower abdominal cytoreductive surgery for more advanced disease have described multidisciplinary approaches. We sought to investigate outcomes in patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery in patients with upper and lower abdominal disease at our institution. METHODS Patients who underwent cytoreductive surgery for ovarian malignancies from 2008 to 2015 were retrospectively identified from an institutional database. Upper abdominal cytoreduction was defined anatomically as debulking of disease proximal to the ligament of Treitz. Perioperative outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS A total of 258 operations were performed, the majority for serous ovarian carcinoma (70%). The gynecologic oncologist was the primary surgeon and often assisted by either a surgical oncology fellow and/or attending. In operations with combined upper and lower abdominal cytoreduction, patients were more likely to have an American society of anesthesiologists physical status classification system (ASA) of 3, peritoneal implants, and liver/spleen metastases. Preoperative chemotherapy and optimal cytoreduction were similar between groups. Perioperative morbidity and mortality were not significantly different between groups. CONCLUSIONS A collaborative surgical approach to combined upper and lower abdominal cytoreductive surgery in patients with ovarian cancer should be performed, if needed, to achieve an optimal cytoreduction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oliver S Eng
- Division of Surgical Oncology, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, California
| | - Mustafa Raoof
- Division of Surgical Oncology, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, California
| | - Andrew M Blakely
- Division of Surgical Oncology, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, California
| | - Xian Yu
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, California
| | - Stephen J Lee
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, California
| | - Ernest S Han
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, California
| | - Mark T Wakabayashi
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, California
| | - Bertram Yuh
- Division of Urologic Oncology, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, California
| | - Byrne Lee
- Division of Surgical Oncology, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, California
| | - Thanh H Dellinger
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, California
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Hamilton CA, Miller A, Casablanca Y, Horowitz NS, Rungruang B, Krivak TC, Richard SD, Rodriguez N, Birrer MJ, Backes FJ, Geller MA, Quinn M, Goodheart MJ, Mutch DG, Kavanagh JJ, Maxwell GL, Bookman MA. Clinicopathologic characteristics associated with long-term survival in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: an NRG Oncology/Gynecologic Oncology Group ancillary data study. Gynecol Oncol 2017; 148:275-280. [PMID: 29195926 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2017.11.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2017] [Revised: 11/14/2017] [Accepted: 11/15/2017] [Indexed: 01/29/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To identify clinicopathologic factors associated with 10-year overall survival in epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) and primary peritoneal cancer (PPC), and to develop a predictive model identifying long-term survivors. METHODS Demographic, surgical, and clinicopathologic data were abstracted from GOG 182 records. The association between clinical variables and long-term survival (LTS) (>10years) was assessed using multivariable regression analysis. Bootstrap methods were used to develop predictive models from known prognostic clinical factors and predictive accuracy was quantified using optimism-adjusted area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). RESULTS The analysis dataset included 3010 evaluable patients, of whom 195 survived greater than ten years. These patients were more likely to have better performance status, endometrioid histology, stage III (rather than stage IV) disease, absence of ascites, less extensive preoperative disease distribution, microscopic disease residual following cyoreduction (R0), and decreased complexity of surgery (p<0.01). Multivariable regression analysis revealed that lower CA-125 levels, absence of ascites, stage, and R0 were significant independent predictors of LTS. A predictive model created using these variables had an AUC=0.729, which outperformed any of the individual predictors. CONCLUSIONS The absence of ascites, a low CA-125, stage, and R0 at the time of cytoreduction are factors associated with LTS when controlling for other confounders. An extensively annotated clinicopathologic prediction model for LTS fell short of clinical utility suggesting that prognostic molecular profiles are needed to better predict which patients are likely to be long-term survivors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C A Hamilton
- Gynecologic Cancer Center of Excellence, John P. Murtha Cancer Center, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center and Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD, United States.
| | - A Miller
- NRG Oncology Statistics and Data Management Center/Gynecologic Oncology Group, Statistical and Data Center, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY, United States
| | - Y Casablanca
- Gynecologic Cancer Center of Excellence, John P. Murtha Cancer Center, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center and Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD, United States
| | - N S Horowitz
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
| | - B Rungruang
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Medical College of Georgia at Augusta University, Augusta, GA, United States
| | - T C Krivak
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Western Pennsylvania Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA, United States
| | - S D Richard
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Hahnemann University Hospital/Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - N Rodriguez
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Loma Linda University Medical Center, Loma Linda, CA, United States
| | - M J Birrer
- Gillette Center for Gynecologic Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
| | - F J Backes
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Cancer Hospital, Columbus, OH, United States
| | - M A Geller
- Gynecology and Women's Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States
| | - M Quinn
- Gynaecological Oncology, ANZGOG, Royal Women's Hospital and University of Melbourne, Australia
| | - M J Goodheart
- Gynecologic Oncology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, United States
| | - D G Mutch
- Gynecologic Oncology, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, United States
| | - J J Kavanagh
- MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - G L Maxwell
- Inova Fairfax Hospital Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Inova Schar Cancer Institute, Falls Church, VA, United States
| | - M A Bookman
- US Oncology Research and Arizona Oncology, Tucson, AZ, United States
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Predictive modeling for determination of microscopic residual disease at primary cytoreduction: An NRG Oncology/Gynecologic Oncology Group 182 Study. Gynecol Oncol 2017; 148:49-55. [PMID: 29174555 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2017.10.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2017] [Revised: 10/05/2017] [Accepted: 10/07/2017] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Microscopic residual disease following complete cytoreduction (R0) is associated with a significant survival benefit for patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). Our objective was to develop a prediction model for R0 to support surgeons in their clinical care decisions. METHODS Demographic, pathologic, surgical, and CA125 data were collected from GOG 182 records. Patients enrolled prior to September 1, 2003 were used for the training model while those enrolled after constituted the validation data set. Univariate analysis was performed to identify significant predictors of R0 and these variables were subsequently analyzed using multivariable regression. The regression model was reduced using backward selection and predictive accuracy was quantified using area under the receiver operating characteristic area under the curve (AUC) in both the training and the validation data sets. RESULTS Of the 3882 patients enrolled in GOG 182, 1480 had complete clinical data available for the analysis. The training data set consisted of 1007 patients (234 with R0) while the validation set was comprised of 473 patients (122 with R0). The reduced multivariable regression model demonstrated several variables predictive of R0 at cytoreduction: Disease Score (DS) (p<0.001), stage (p=0.009), CA125 (p<0.001), ascites (p<0.001), and stage-age interaction (p=0.01). Applying the prediction model to the validation data resulted in an AUC of 0.73 (0.67 to 0.78, 95% CI). Inclusion of DS enhanced the model performance to an AUC of 0.83 (0.79 to 0.88, 95% CI). CONCLUSIONS We developed and validated a prediction model for R0 that offers improved performance over previously reported models for prediction of residual disease. The performance of the prediction model suggests additional factors (i.e. imaging, molecular profiling, etc.) should be explored in the future for a more clinically actionable tool.
Collapse
|
39
|
Grimm C, Harter P, Alesina PF, Prader S, Schneider S, Ataseven B, Meier B, Brunkhorst V, Hinrichs J, Kurzeder C, Heitz F, Kahl A, Traut A, Groeben HT, Walz M, du Bois A. The impact of type and number of bowel resections on anastomotic leakage risk in advanced ovarian cancer surgery. Gynecol Oncol 2017; 146:498-503. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2017.06.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2017] [Revised: 06/03/2017] [Accepted: 06/06/2017] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
|
40
|
Gallotta V, Ferrandina G, Vizzielli G, Conte C, Lucidi A, Costantini B, De Rose AM, Di Giorgio A, Zannoni GF, Fagotti A, Scambia G, Chiantera V. Hepatoceliac Lymph Node Involvement in Advanced Ovarian Cancer Patients: Prognostic Role and Clinical Considerations. Ann Surg Oncol 2017; 24:3413-3421. [PMID: 28718034 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-017-6005-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2017] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The study aimed too investigate the rate of hepatoceliac lymph node (HCLN) involvement, as well as its association with clinicopathologic features, together with morbidity of HCLN resection and the prognostic impact of metastatic HCLN status on patients with advanced ovarian cancer (OC) undergoing cytoreductive surgery. METHODS All consecutive patients with stages 3c to 4 epithelial OC who underwent HCLN surgery from January 2010 to September 2016 were analyzed for surgical procedures, pathology, and oncologic outcomes. RESULTS During the study period, 85 patients underwent HCLN resection. Absence of visible tumor at the end of surgery was documented for 73 of the patients (85.9%). The median number of HCLNs removed was 6 (range 1-18). Histopathologic evaluation was able to identify HCLN metastasis in 45 (52.9%) of the 85 cases. No difference in the rate of surgical morbidity according to pathologic status of HCLN was observed. As of December 2016, the median follow-up period was 36 months (range 6-54 months). Recurrence of disease was observed in 35 (41.2%) of the 85 cases. Relapse of disease most frequently occurred for the patients with metastatic HCLN involvement (65.7%) compared with the patients who had no HCLN involvement (34.3%) (p = 0.048). The median progression-free survival values were 16 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 12-19 months) for the patients with metastatic HCLNs and 22 months (95% CI, 12-19 months) for the patients with no HCLN involvement (p = 0.035). CONCLUSIONS The study confirmed that HCLN surgery is feasible with acceptable morbidities for patients with advanced OC. Metastatic HCLNs are a marker of disease severity associated with worst oncologic outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Valerio Gallotta
- Department of Women's and Children's Health, "Agostino Gemelli" Foundation University Hospital, Rome, Italy.
| | - Gabriella Ferrandina
- Department of Women's and Children's Health, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy.,Department of Health Sciences and Medicine, University of Molise, Campobasso, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Vizzielli
- Department of Women's and Children's Health, "Agostino Gemelli" Foundation University Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Carmine Conte
- Department of Women's and Children's Health, "Agostino Gemelli" Foundation University Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Alessandro Lucidi
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | - Barbara Costantini
- Department of Women's and Children's Health, "Agostino Gemelli" Foundation University Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Agostino Maria De Rose
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Unit, A. Gemelli Hospital "Agostino Gemelli" Foundation University Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Andrea Di Giorgio
- Division of Surgery, "Agostino Gemelli" Foundation University Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Gian Franco Zannoni
- Department of Pathology, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
| | - Anna Fagotti
- Department of Women's and Children's Health, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
| | - Giovanni Scambia
- Department of Women's and Children's Health, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
| | - Vito Chiantera
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Rungruang BJ, Miller A, Krivak TC, Horowitz NS, Rodriguez N, Hamilton CA, Backes FJ, Carson LF, Friedlander M, Mutch DG, Goodheart MJ, Tewari KS, Wenham RM, Bookman MA, Maxwell GL, Richard SD. What is the role of retroperitoneal exploration in optimally debulked stage IIIC epithelial ovarian cancer? An NRG Oncology/Gynecologic Oncology Group ancillary data study. Cancer 2016; 123:985-993. [PMID: 27864921 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.30414] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2016] [Revised: 09/02/2016] [Accepted: 09/30/2016] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of retroperitoneal (RP) exploration on progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) patients with stage IIIC disease who underwent optimal debulking surgery. METHODS Data were collected from records of the Gynecologic Oncology Group 182 (GOG-182) study of stage IIIC EOC patients cytoreduced to no gross residual disease (R0) or minimal gross residual (<1 cm) disease (MGRD) at primary surgery. Patients with stage IIIC disease by intraperitoneal (IP) tumor were included and divided into 3 groups: 1) > 2 cm IP tumor without lymph node involvement (IP/RP-), 2) > 2 cm IP tumor with lymph node involvement (IP/RP+), and 3) > 2 cm IP tumor with no RP exploration (IP/RP?). The effects of disease distribution and RP exploration on PFS and OS were assessed using Kaplan-Meier and proportional hazards methods. RESULTS There were 1871 stage IIIC patients in GOG-182 who underwent optimal primary debulking surgery. Of these, 689 (36.8%) underwent RP exploration with removal of lymph nodes from at least 1 para-aortic site, and 1182 (63.2%) did not. There were 269 patients in the IP/RP- group, 420 patients in the IP/RP + group, and 1182 patients in the IP/RP? group. Improved PFS (18.5 vs 16.0 months; P < .0001) and OS (53.3 vs 42.8 months; P < .0001) were associated with RP exploration versus no exploration. Patients with MGRD had improved PFS (16.8 vs 15.1 months, P = 0.0108) and OS (44.9 vs 40.5 months, P = 0.0076) versus no exploration. CONCLUSIONS RP exploration at the time of primary surgery in patients with optimally debulked stage IIIC EOC is associated with a survival benefit. Cancer 2017;123:985-93. © 2016 American Cancer Society.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bunja J Rungruang
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical College of Georgia of Augusta University, Augusta, Georgia
| | - Austin Miller
- Gynecologic Oncology Group, Statistical and Data Center, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, New York
| | - Thomas C Krivak
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Western Pennsylvania Allegheny Hospital, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Neil S Horowitz
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Noah Rodriguez
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kaiser Permanente Irvine Medical Center, Irvine, California
| | - Chad A Hamilton
- Gynecologic Oncology Service, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Floor J Backes
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ohio State University Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Linda F Carson
- Department of OB/GYN and Women's Health, University of Minnesota School of Medicine, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Michael Friedlander
- Department of Cancer Medicine, ANZGOG, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - David G Mutch
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri
| | - Michael J Goodheart
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa
| | - Krishnansu S Tewari
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of California Medical Center-Irvine, Orange, California
| | - Robert M Wenham
- Department of Gynecology Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, Florida
| | | | - G Larry Maxwell
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Inova Fairfax Hospital Women's Center, Falls Church, Virginia
| | - Scott D Richard
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Tozzi R, Traill Z, Garruto Campanile R, Ferrari F, Soleymani Majd H, Nieuwstad J, Hardern K, Gubbala K. Porta hepatis peritonectomy and hepato-celiac lymphadenectomy in patients with stage IIIC-IV ovarian cancer: Diagnostic pathway, surgical technique and outcomes. Gynecol Oncol 2016; 143:35-39. [PMID: 27519966 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2016.08.232] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2016] [Revised: 07/31/2016] [Accepted: 08/04/2016] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To report the surgical technique of ovarian cancer resection at the porta hepatis (PH) and hepato-celiac lymph nodes (HCL). To assess surgical and survival outcomes. Define the accuracy of an integrated diagnostic pathway. METHODS Patients with FIGO stage IIIC-IV ovarian cancer that underwent Visceral-Peritoneal Debulking (VPD). Data of patients with disease at the PH/HCL during VPD were extracted from our database. The CT scan findings were compared with the exploratory laparoscopy. Accuracy of CT scan, intra- and post-operative morbidity, rate of complete resection (CR), disease free and overall survival are reported. RESULTS Thirty one patients out of 216 (14.3%) had tumor at the PH and/or HCL. In 8 patients out of 31 (25.8%) it was only found with the aid of the exploratory laparoscopy. CR was achieved in 28 patients out of 31 (90.3%). Pathology confirmed disease in the PH/HCL specimens of all but one patient. Overall morbidity relating to the VPD was 29.2%. No complication was specifically related to the PH/HCL. Median disease free survival was 19months and median overall survival was 42months. CONCLUSION PH/HCL surgery was required in 15% of patients with FIGO stage IIIC-IV. The surgery was feasible, safe and significantly contributed to CR. CT scan failed to identify the disease in 31% of the patients. CT and laparoscopy correctly identified all patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roberto Tozzi
- Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, Oxford University Hospital, Oxford, UK.
| | - Zoe Traill
- Department of Radiology, Oxford University Hospital, Oxford, UK
| | | | - Federico Ferrari
- Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, Oxford University Hospital, Oxford, UK
| | | | - Joost Nieuwstad
- Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, Oxford University Hospital, Oxford, UK
| | - Kieran Hardern
- Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, Oxford University Hospital, Oxford, UK
| | - Kumar Gubbala
- Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, Oxford University Hospital, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Heitz F, Harter P, Alesina PF, Walz MK, Lorenz D, Groeben H, Heikaus S, Fisseler-Eckhoff A, Schneider S, Ataseven B, Kurzeder C, Prader S, Beutel B, Traut A, du Bois A. Pattern of and reason for postoperative residual disease in patients with advanced ovarian cancer following upfront radical debulking surgery. Gynecol Oncol 2016; 141:264-270. [PMID: 26975900 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2016.03.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/07/2016] [Revised: 03/09/2016] [Accepted: 03/10/2016] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Describing the pattern of and reasons for post-operative tumor residuals in patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (AOC) operated in a specialized gynecologic cancer center following a strategy of maximum upfront debulking followed by systemic chemotherapy. METHODS All consecutive AOC-patients treated between 2005 and 2015 due to stages FIGO IIIB/IV were included in this single-center analysis. RESULTS 739 patients were included in this analysis. In 81 (11.0%) patients, chemotherapy had already started before referral. Of the remaining 658 patients, upfront debulking was indicated in 578 patients (87.8%), while 80 patients (12.8%) were classified ineligible for upfront debulking; mostly due to comorbidities. A complete tumor resection was achieved in 66.1% of the 578 patients with upfront surgery, 25.4% had residuals 1-10mm and 8.5% had residuals exceeding 10mm, and 12.5% of patients had multifocal residual disease. Most common localization was small bowel mesentery and serosa (79.8%), porta hepatis/hepatoduodenal ligament (10.1%), liver parenchyma (4.3%), pancreas (8.0%), gastric serosa (3.2%), and tumor surrounding/infiltrating the truncus coeliacus (2.7%); 14.9% of the patients had non-resectable supra diaphragmatic lesions. Size of residual tumor was significantly associated with progression-free and overall survival. CONCLUSIONS Upfront debulking for AOC followed by systemic chemotherapy was our main treatment strategy in almost 90% of all patients. The majority experienced a benefit by this approach; while 11.7% of patients probably did not. Understanding sites and reason for residual disease may help to develop adequate surgical training programs but also to identify patients that would better benefit from alternative treatment strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Florian Heitz
- Department of Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Evangelische Huyssens-Stiftung, Germany; Department of Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Horst-Schmidt Klinik Wiesbaden, Germany.
| | - Philipp Harter
- Department of Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Evangelische Huyssens-Stiftung, Germany; Department of Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Horst-Schmidt Klinik Wiesbaden, Germany
| | - Piero F Alesina
- Department for Surgery and Centre of Minimal Invasive Surgery, Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Evangelische Huyssens-Stiftung, Germany
| | - Martin K Walz
- Department for Surgery and Centre of Minimal Invasive Surgery, Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Evangelische Huyssens-Stiftung, Germany
| | - Dietmar Lorenz
- Department for Surgery, Sana Klinikum Offenbach, Germany; Department for Surgery, Dr. Horst-Schmidt-Kliniken Wiesbaden, Germany
| | - Harald Groeben
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Evangelische Huyssens-Stiftung, Germany
| | | | | | - Stephanie Schneider
- Department of Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Evangelische Huyssens-Stiftung, Germany
| | - Beyhan Ataseven
- Department of Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Evangelische Huyssens-Stiftung, Germany
| | - Christian Kurzeder
- Department of Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Evangelische Huyssens-Stiftung, Germany
| | - Sonia Prader
- Department of Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Evangelische Huyssens-Stiftung, Germany
| | - Bianca Beutel
- Department of Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Horst-Schmidt Klinik Wiesbaden, Germany
| | - Alexander Traut
- Department of Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Evangelische Huyssens-Stiftung, Germany; Department of Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Horst-Schmidt Klinik Wiesbaden, Germany
| | - Andreas du Bois
- Department of Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Evangelische Huyssens-Stiftung, Germany; Department of Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Horst-Schmidt Klinik Wiesbaden, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Martinez A, Ngo C, Leblanc E, Gouy S, Luyckx M, Darai E, Classe JM, Guyon F, Pomel C, Ferron G, Filleron T, Querleu D. Surgical Complexity Impact on Survival After Complete Cytoreductive Surgery for Advanced Ovarian Cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2016; 23:2515-21. [DOI: 10.1245/s10434-015-5069-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2015] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
|
45
|
Surgical Techniques for Diaphragmatic Resection During Cytoreduction in Advanced or Recurrent Ovarian Carcinoma. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2016; 26:371-80. [DOI: 10.1097/igc.0000000000000597] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
|
46
|
Step by step right upper quadrant cytoreduction guided by computed tomography in advanced ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2015; 139:582-3. [PMID: 26456140 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2015.10.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2015] [Revised: 09/30/2015] [Accepted: 10/05/2015] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
|
47
|
Ren Y, Jiang R, Yin S, You C, Liu D, Cheng X, Tang J, Zang R. Radical surgery versus standard surgery for primary cytoreduction of bulky stage IIIC and IV ovarian cancer: an observational study. BMC Cancer 2015; 15:583. [PMID: 26268818 PMCID: PMC4535562 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-015-1525-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2014] [Accepted: 06/26/2015] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The aim of this study was to evaluate the survival benefit of radical surgery with additional extensive upper abdominal procedures (EUAS) for the treatment of stage IIIC and IV ovarian cancer with bulky upper abdominal disease (UAD). Methods An observational study was conducted between 2009 and 2012 involving two different surgical teams. Team A was composed of the “believers” in EUAS and Team B the “non-believers” in EUAS. Patients were divided into a radical surgery group (EUAS group) or a standard surgery group (non-EUAS group) according to whether or not they had received EUAS. All patients underwent primary cytoreductive surgery with the goal of optimal debulking (≤1 cm); this was reviewed in the pelvis, middle abdomen, and upper abdomen. The baseline for the two groups was optimal cytoreduction in both the pelvis and middle abdomen. Progression-free survival (PFS) was evaluated. Results Radical surgery was performed in 70.7 % (82/116) and 12.7 % (30/237) of the patients by Teams A and B, respectively. The study groups had similar clinicopathologic characteristics. The median PFS and OS were significantly improved in the radical surgery group, compared with standard surgery groups (PFS: 19.5 vs. 13.3 months, HR: 0.61; 95 % CI: 0.46–0.80, P < 0.001; OS: not reached vs. 39.3 months, HR: 0.47; 95 % CI: 0.30–0.72, P < 0.001). Positive predictors of complete cytoreduction were treatment with neoadjuvant chemotherapy, improved American Society of Anesthesiologists performance status, and the absence of bowel mesenteric carcinomatosis. Conclusions Radical surgery lengthens the PFS and overall survival times of ovarian cancer patients with bulky UAD. However, a well-designed randomized trial is needed to confirm the present results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yulan Ren
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai 200032, China.
| | - Rong Jiang
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai 200032, China. .,Division of Gynecology Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China.
| | - Sheng Yin
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai 200032, China.
| | - Chao You
- Department of Radiology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai 200032, China.
| | - Dongli Liu
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai 200032, China.
| | - Xi Cheng
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai 200032, China.
| | - Jie Tang
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai 200032, China.
| | - Rongyu Zang
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai 200032, China. .,Division of Gynecology Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China.
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Neo-adjuvant chemotherapy does not increase the rate of complete resection and does not significantly reduce the morbidity of Visceral–Peritoneal Debulking (VPD) in patients with stage IIIC–IV ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2015; 138:252-8. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2015.05.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2015] [Accepted: 05/14/2015] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
|
49
|
Benedetti Panici P, Di Donato V, Fischetti M, Casorelli A, Perniola G, Musella A, Marchetti C, Palaia I, Berloco P, Muzii L. Predictors of postoperative morbidity after cytoreduction for advanced ovarian cancer: Analysis and management of complications in upper abdominal surgery. Gynecol Oncol 2015; 137:406-11. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2015.03.043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 53] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/31/2014] [Accepted: 03/22/2015] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
|
50
|
Horowitz NS, Miller A, Rungruang B, Richard SD, Rodriguez N, Bookman MA, Hamilton CA, Krivak TC, Maxwell GL. Does aggressive surgery improve outcomes? Interaction between preoperative disease burden and complex surgery in patients with advanced-stage ovarian cancer: an analysis of GOG 182. J Clin Oncol 2015; 33:937-43. [PMID: 25667285 PMCID: PMC4348639 DOI: 10.1200/jco.2014.56.3106] [Citation(s) in RCA: 191] [Impact Index Per Article: 21.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To examine the effects of disease burden, complex surgery, and residual disease (RD) status on progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) or primary peritoneal cancer (PPC) and complete surgical resection (R0) or < 1 cm of RD (MR) after surgical cytoreduction. PATIENTS AND METHODS Demographic, pathologic, surgical, and outcome data were collected from 2,655 patients with EOC or PPC enrolled onto the Gynecologic Oncology Group 182 study. The effects of disease distribution (disease score [DS]) and complexity of surgery (complexity score [CS]) on PFS and OS were assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method and multivariable regression analysis. RESULTS Consistent with existing literature, patients with MR had worse prognosis than R0 patients (PFS, 15 v 29 months; P < .01; OS, 41 v 77 months; P < .01). Patients with the highest preoperative disease burden (DS high) had shorter PFS (15 v 23 or 34 months; P < .01) and OS (40 v 71 or 86 months; P < .01) compared with those with DS moderate or low, respectively. This relationship was maintained in the subset of R0 patients with PFS (18.3 v 33.2 months; DS moderate or low: P < .001) and OS (50.1 v 82.8 months; DS moderate or low: P < .001). After controlling for DS, RD, an interaction term for DS/CS, performance status, age, and cell type, CS was not an independent predictor of either PFS or OS. CONCLUSION In this large multi-institutional sample, initial disease burden remained a significant prognostic indicator despite R0. Complex surgery does not seem to affect survival when accounting for other confounding influences, particularly RD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Neil S Horowitz
- Neil S. Horowitz, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; Austin Miller, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY; Bunja Rungruang, Georgia Regents University, Augusta, GA; Scott D. Richard, Hahnemann University Hospital, Philadelphia; Thomas C. Krivak, Western Pennsylvania Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA; Noah Rodriguez, Kaiser Permanente Irvine Medical Center, Irvine, CA; Michael A. Bookman, University of Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, AZ; Chad A. Hamilton, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD; and G. Larry Maxwell, Inova Fairfax Women's Hospital, Falls Church, VA
| | - Austin Miller
- Neil S. Horowitz, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; Austin Miller, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY; Bunja Rungruang, Georgia Regents University, Augusta, GA; Scott D. Richard, Hahnemann University Hospital, Philadelphia; Thomas C. Krivak, Western Pennsylvania Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA; Noah Rodriguez, Kaiser Permanente Irvine Medical Center, Irvine, CA; Michael A. Bookman, University of Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, AZ; Chad A. Hamilton, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD; and G. Larry Maxwell, Inova Fairfax Women's Hospital, Falls Church, VA
| | - Bunja Rungruang
- Neil S. Horowitz, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; Austin Miller, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY; Bunja Rungruang, Georgia Regents University, Augusta, GA; Scott D. Richard, Hahnemann University Hospital, Philadelphia; Thomas C. Krivak, Western Pennsylvania Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA; Noah Rodriguez, Kaiser Permanente Irvine Medical Center, Irvine, CA; Michael A. Bookman, University of Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, AZ; Chad A. Hamilton, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD; and G. Larry Maxwell, Inova Fairfax Women's Hospital, Falls Church, VA
| | - Scott D Richard
- Neil S. Horowitz, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; Austin Miller, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY; Bunja Rungruang, Georgia Regents University, Augusta, GA; Scott D. Richard, Hahnemann University Hospital, Philadelphia; Thomas C. Krivak, Western Pennsylvania Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA; Noah Rodriguez, Kaiser Permanente Irvine Medical Center, Irvine, CA; Michael A. Bookman, University of Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, AZ; Chad A. Hamilton, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD; and G. Larry Maxwell, Inova Fairfax Women's Hospital, Falls Church, VA
| | - Noah Rodriguez
- Neil S. Horowitz, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; Austin Miller, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY; Bunja Rungruang, Georgia Regents University, Augusta, GA; Scott D. Richard, Hahnemann University Hospital, Philadelphia; Thomas C. Krivak, Western Pennsylvania Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA; Noah Rodriguez, Kaiser Permanente Irvine Medical Center, Irvine, CA; Michael A. Bookman, University of Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, AZ; Chad A. Hamilton, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD; and G. Larry Maxwell, Inova Fairfax Women's Hospital, Falls Church, VA
| | - Michael A Bookman
- Neil S. Horowitz, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; Austin Miller, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY; Bunja Rungruang, Georgia Regents University, Augusta, GA; Scott D. Richard, Hahnemann University Hospital, Philadelphia; Thomas C. Krivak, Western Pennsylvania Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA; Noah Rodriguez, Kaiser Permanente Irvine Medical Center, Irvine, CA; Michael A. Bookman, University of Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, AZ; Chad A. Hamilton, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD; and G. Larry Maxwell, Inova Fairfax Women's Hospital, Falls Church, VA
| | - Chad A Hamilton
- Neil S. Horowitz, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; Austin Miller, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY; Bunja Rungruang, Georgia Regents University, Augusta, GA; Scott D. Richard, Hahnemann University Hospital, Philadelphia; Thomas C. Krivak, Western Pennsylvania Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA; Noah Rodriguez, Kaiser Permanente Irvine Medical Center, Irvine, CA; Michael A. Bookman, University of Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, AZ; Chad A. Hamilton, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD; and G. Larry Maxwell, Inova Fairfax Women's Hospital, Falls Church, VA
| | - Thomas C Krivak
- Neil S. Horowitz, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; Austin Miller, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY; Bunja Rungruang, Georgia Regents University, Augusta, GA; Scott D. Richard, Hahnemann University Hospital, Philadelphia; Thomas C. Krivak, Western Pennsylvania Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA; Noah Rodriguez, Kaiser Permanente Irvine Medical Center, Irvine, CA; Michael A. Bookman, University of Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, AZ; Chad A. Hamilton, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD; and G. Larry Maxwell, Inova Fairfax Women's Hospital, Falls Church, VA
| | - G Larry Maxwell
- Neil S. Horowitz, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; Austin Miller, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY; Bunja Rungruang, Georgia Regents University, Augusta, GA; Scott D. Richard, Hahnemann University Hospital, Philadelphia; Thomas C. Krivak, Western Pennsylvania Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA; Noah Rodriguez, Kaiser Permanente Irvine Medical Center, Irvine, CA; Michael A. Bookman, University of Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, AZ; Chad A. Hamilton, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD; and G. Larry Maxwell, Inova Fairfax Women's Hospital, Falls Church, VA.
| |
Collapse
|