Fertility sparing treatment of complex atypical hyperplasia and low grade endometrial cancer using oral progestin

Outcomes of extended progestin therapy in atypical endometrial hyperplasia patients without an initial response to progestin: a retrospective study from two tertiary centers in Korea and Taiwan

OBJECTIVE

In this study, we evaluated the role of prolonged progestin treatment on atypical endometrial hyperplasia (AEH) patients who did not achieve complete regression (CR) after at least 3 months of progestin treatment. Possible prognostic factors predicting disease regression and recurrence were also assessed.

METHODS

We retrospectively identified patients who had histologically confirmed persistent disease after at least 3 months of progestin treatment at two tertiary centers in Korea and Taiwan. Clinicopathologic factors and clinical outcomes were obtained from medical records. Logistic regression was used to analyze the relationship between covariates and the probability of CR and relapse.

RESULTS

Fifty-two patients were included. Thirty-seven of 52 patients (71.2%) achieved CR after prolonged progestin treatment. Median time from starting progestin treatment to CR was 12.0 months. Daily administration of medroxyprogesterone acetate ≥200 mg or megestrol acetate ≥80 mg was associated with higher probability of regression. Nineteen of 37 patients (51.4%) experienced recurrence, with median time from CR to relapse of 15.0 months. Body mass index ≥27 was associated with higher relapse probability. Twelve of 16 patients with disease progression to endometrial carcinoma underwent surgery. The 12 cases had stage I tumors and lived without disease.

CONCLUSION

Extension of progestin treatment course is feasible for AEH patients without an initial response to progestin. Higher daily progestin dosage was associated with higher probability of CR, and obesity was associated with higher risk of relapse. The patients without an initial response to progestins and whose AEH progressed to endometrial carcinoma had good prognoses.

Diagnostic significance and predictive efficiency of metabolic risk score for fertility-sparing treatment in patients with atypical endometrial hyperplasia and early endometrial carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to assess the impact of the metabolic risk score (MRS) on time to achieve complete remission (CR) of fertility-sparing treatments for atypical endometrial hyperplasia (AEH) and early endometrial cancer (EC) patients.

METHODS

Univariate and multivariate cox analyses were employed to identify independent risk factors affecting the time to CR with patients at our center. These factors were subsequently incorporated into receiver operator characteristic curve analysis and decision curve analysis to assess the predictive accuracy of time to CR. Additionally, Kaplan-Meier analysis was utilized to determine the cumulative CR rate for patients.

RESULTS

The 173 patients who achieved CR following fertility preservation treatment (FPT) were categorized into three subgroups based on their time to CR (<6, 6-9, >9 months). Body mass index (hazard ratio [HR]=0.20; 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.03, 0.38; p=0.026), MRS (HR=0.31; 95% CI=0.09, 0.52; p=0.005), insulin resistance (HR=1.83; 95% CI=0.05, 3.60; p=0.045), menstruation regularity (HR=3.77; 95% CI=1.91, 5.64; p=0.001), polycystic ovary syndrome (HR=-2.16; 95% CI=-4.03, -0.28; p=0.025), and histological type (HR=0.36; 95% CI=0.10, 0.62; p=0.005) were identified as risk factors for time to CR, with MRS being the independent risk factor (HR=0.29; 95% CI=0.02, 0.56; p=0.021). The inclusion of MRS significantly enhanced the predictive accuracy of time to CR (area under the curve [AUC]=0.789 for Model 1, AUC=0.862 for Model 2, p=0.032). Kaplan-Meier survival curves revealed significant differences in the cumulative CR rate among different risk groups.

CONCLUSION

MRS emerges as a novel evaluation system that substantially enhances the predictive accuracy for the time to achieve CR in AEH and early EC patients seeking fertility preservation.

Chinese guidelines on the management of endometrial hyperplasia

• Endometrial hyperplasia can be classified as either hyperplasia without atypia or atypical hyperplasia. • Abnormal uterine bleeding is the most common symptom of endometrial hyperplasia. Transvaginal ultrasound is recommended for initial imaging to evaluate endometrial hyperplasia (evidence level 2+), while transrectal ultrasound is recommended for virgo patients (evidence level 3). • Endometrial biopsy should be used to confirm diagnosis in patients where endometrial lesions are suspected. Effective histological approaches to make definite diagnoses include diagnostic curettage (evidence level 2++), hysteroscopic-guided biopsy (evidence level 2+) and endometrial aspiration biopsy (evidence level 2-). • Progesterone is the preferred medication for the treatment of endometrial hyperplasia without atypia. Compared to oral progestins, placement of a levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) has been associated with higher regression rates, lower recurrence rates and fewer adverse events which can be the initial treatment method. (Meta evidence level 1-, RCT evidence level 2+). Ultrasound and endometrial biopsies should be performed every 6 months during treatment to evaluate its effect and treatment should continue until no pathological changes are observed in two consecutive endometrial biopsies. Hysterectomy is not the preferred choice of treatment for patients with endometrial hyperplasia without atypia. • Minimally invasive hysterectomy is indicated for patients with endometrial atypical hyperplasia (evidence level 1+), bilateral fallopian tubes should also be removed (evidence level 2+). In cases where surgery cannot be tolerated, fertility is desired or the patient is younger than 45 years old, medical therapy is recommended (evidence level 3). LNG-IUS is the preferred medical therapy method (evidence level 2+). Endometrial pathologic evaluation should be performed every 3 months during conservative treatments, with adjustments made to dosages or approaches based on observed response to medication. Treatment should continue until no pathological changes are detected in two consecutive endometrial biopsies (evidence level 2++). There is no indication of sentinel lymph nodes biopsy and/or lymphadenectomy for hyperplasia with or without atypia. • Total hysterectomy is recommended to treat patients with recurrent endometrial atypical hyperplasia (evidence level 3); however, medical conservative therapy may be considered for patients hoping to become pregnant in the future. • Patients with fully regressed disease who would like to become pregnant should be advised to seek assistance through assisted reproductive technologies (evidence level 3). • Long-term follow-up is suggested for patients after endometrial hyperplasia treatment (evidence level 2+). Patient education is imperative for improving medication adherence, increasing regression rates and lowering recurrence rates (evidence level 3).

The Analysis of in vitro Fertilization Outcomes after Fertility-Preserving Therapy for Endometrial Hyperplasia or Carcinoma

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to evaluate the clinical efficacy of fertility-preserving therapy through in vitro fertilization (IVF) procedures in women who were pathologically diagnosed with endometrial hyperplasia or carcinoma.

DESIGN

A retrospective cohort study on fertility-preserving therapy was conducted. Participants/Materials, Setting: A total of 82 women were enrolled who had simple endometrial hyperplasia (SH), complex hyperplasia (CH), complex atypical hyperplasia (CAH), and endometrioid endometrial carcinoma stage IA (EC IA) and underwent IVF at Gangnam CHA fertility center between January 2008 and December 2020.

METHODS

The primary endpoints were oncologic outcomes and subsequent reproductive outcomes of patients who underwent fertility-preserving treatments analyzed by χ2 test or Fisher's exact test.

RESULTS

Of the 82 patients, 33 had a cumulative clinical pregnancy (40.2%), and 25 had a cumulative live birth (30.5%) through IVF procedures following pathologic confirmation of complete remission or non-progressive status. The cumulative clinical pregnancy rates and live birth rates for SH were 50.0% and 30.0%, for CH were 37.8% and 28.9%, for CAH were 25.0% and 25.0%, and for EC were 38.5% and 38.5%, respectively. There were no significant differences in cumulative clinical pregnancy rates or live birth rates when comparing the four groups. There was a difference in endometrial thickness between medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) treatment group and intrauterine device (IUD) group (p = 0.036); however, there were no significant differences in clinical pregnancy rates among MPA, IUD, and MPA+IUD groups.

LIMITATIONS

Because of the retrospective nature of the study, many factors relevant to the treatment decision were not strictly controlled.

CONCLUSIONS

All endometrial hyperplasia and carcinoma groups had competent cumulative live birth rates by IVF procedures. There may be differences in endometrial thickness depending on the treatment methods, but this does not affect clinical pregnancy rates. Therefore, the fertility-preserving treatment for endometrial hyperplasia and carcinoma is a safe and feasible method that results in good IVF outcomes.

Efficacy of fertility-sparing treatment with LNG-IUS is associated with different ProMisE subtypes of endometrial carcinoma or atypical endometrial hyperplasia

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether proactive molecular risk classifier for endometrial cancer (ProMisE) could be used to assess the prognosis of patients with atypical endometrial hyperplasia (AEH) or early-stage endometrial cancer (EC) treated with levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS).

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted among 93 AEH or early-stage EC patients who received LNG-IUS to preserve fertility . By immunohistochemistry and gene sequencing, 4 subtypes of ProMisE were identified (p53 wild type [p53 wt], mismatch repair-deficient [MMRd], p53-abnormal, and POLE-mutated). The primary outcome was the time to complete response (CR) after LNG-IUS therapy. Secondary outcomes included the recurrence rate after CR and success rate of conception.

RESULTS

Among the 93 patients, 15 (16.1%) were classified as MMRd, 6 (6.5%) as POLE-mutated, 5 (5.4%) as p53-abnormal, and 67 (72.0%) as p53 wt. Comparison of serum cancer antigen 125, family history of tumor, and positive rates of programmed cell death 1 ligand 1 protein and Ki67 protein in 4 groups showed statistically significant differences (p<0.05). Patients with the p53-abnormal subtype had the lowest overall CR rate (40%) and the highest recurrence rate (2/2). Patients with POLE-mutated subtype had the best prognosis, and all 6 patients achieved CR. When patients achieved complete remission, assisted reproductive technology was more likely to help them conceive than natural conception (p<0.05).

CONCLUSION

Patients with early-stage EC or AEH who are more likely to benefit from fertility-sparing treatment can be identified using ProMisE classifier. Patients with POLE-mutated are suitable for fertility-sparing treatment with LNG-IUS.

Conservative re-treatment of women with atypical endometrial hyperplasia and early endometrial carcinoma: We can hope, at least

BACKGROUND

In women with recurrent disease who were conservatively treated for atypical endometrial hyperplasia (AEH) and early endometrial carcinoma (EEC), the reasons why conservative treatment was chosen persist and outcomes of performing a conservative re-treatment are unclear, as pooled estimates on oncologic outcomes of such a re-treatment are lacking.

OBJECTIVES

To provide pooled estimates of oncologic outcomes of conservative re-treatment in women with recurrent AEH or EC.

SEARCH STRATEGY

A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed by searching six electronic databases from their inception to March 2022.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Studies that allowed extraction of data about oncologic outcomes of conservative re-treatment of women with recurrent AEH and EEC after a conservative treatment.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Pooled prevalence of complete response (CR), poor response (PR), and recurrence after conservative re-treatment was calculated.

MAIN RESULTS

Fifteen studies (12 retrospective and 3 prospective) with 492 women (42.1% AEH and 57.9% EEC) were included in the systematic review, and 10 studies (8 retrospective and 2 prospective) were suitable for the meta-analysis. Pooled prevalence was 85.3% (95% confidence interval [CI] 77.0%-91.0%) for CR, 14.7% (95% CI 9.0%-23.0%) for PR, and 40.4% (95% CI 15.5%-71.4%) for recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

Conservative re-treatment in AEH or EC recurrent women has a high CR rate and acceptable recurrence rate that might allow it to be considered a safe and viable option, at least as a first round of conservative treatment. Women with an unsatisfied desire for motherhood or with high surgical risk might avoid hysterectomy and attempt childbearing or spare high-risk surgery.

The impact of previous conservative treatment of atypical hyperplasia on pregnancy outcomes after IVF/ICSI-embryo transfer: a propensity score-matched retrospective cohort study

STUDY QUESTION

Do women have worse pregnancy and neonatal outcomes of IVF/ICSI-fresh embryo transfer (ET) after conservative treatment of atypical hyperplasia (AH)?

SUMMARY ANSWER

AH has no impact on live birth but is associated with increased risks of pregnancy loss and preterm delivery (PTD).

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

AH is a precancerous lesion of endometrial cancer. Several recognized AH risk factors include nulliparity, increased body mass index, ovulation disorders, diabetes mellitus, and others. As such, patients are suggested to attempt conception upon achieving AH regression. Recently, successful pregnancies with IVF/ICSI have been increasingly reported.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION

Forty-two patients with AH regression and 18 700 women with no evidence of endometrial abnormality, who underwent their first autologous oocytes' retrieval and fresh ET cycles of IVF/ICSI in the Center for Reproductive Medicine, Shandong University, from May 2008 to July 2021, were retrospectively enrolled.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS

First, 42 AH patients were propensity score matched with control women (n = 168) at a 1:4 ratio. Reproductive outcomes and maternal/neonatal complications were compared between the matched pairs. Binary logistic regression analyses were conducted to assess odds ratios (ORs) of AH for live birth, pregnancy loss, and PTD from AH women and all 18 700 eligible controls.

MAIN RESULT AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

Patients with AH achieved a numerically lower live birth rate (LBR) as compared to the matched controls, but without significant difference (26% versus 37%, P = 0.192). However, compared with the matched controls, AH patients showed significantly higher rates of pregnancy loss (52% versus 21%, P = 0.003) and PTD (45% versus 16%, P = 0.041). Further analyses revealed a statistically significantly increased rate of late pregnancy loss (17% versus 3%, P = 0.023), but not early miscarriage (35% versus 18%, P = 0.086), in the AH group. Furthermore, after correcting for potential confounders, the likelihood of a live birth in AH patients narrowly failed to be statistically significantly different from controls (adjusted OR [aOR]: 0.51, 95% CI: 0.25-1.04, P = 0.064). Nonetheless, the logistic regression reconfirmed that AH was an independent risk factor for pregnancy loss (aOR: 3.62, 95% CI: 1.55-8.46, P = 0.003), late pregnancy loss (aOR: 9.33, 95% CI: 3.00-29.02, P < 0.001), and PTD (aOR: 5.70, 95% CI: 1.45-22.38, P = 0.013).

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION

Selection bias was an inherent drawback of this study. First, because of the low AH prevalence among women receiving IVF/ICSI treatment, and consequently, limited sample size, the relationship between AH with LBR and adverse complications might be concealed and underestimated. Hence, the results should be interpreted cautiously. Similarly, the impacts of diverse clinical features of AH patients on the pregnancy outcomes need further studies in a larger population. Second, although most data used in this study were obtained by reviewing the medical records, missing data did exist and so did the recall bias. Third, although the propensity score matching and multivariable logistic models were performed collectively in order to minimize potential confounders between AH and controls, the intrinsic disadvantages of the retrospective nature of this study could not be avoided completely, and additional confirmation bias might be induced with reduplication of statistical analyses.

WIDER IMPLICATION OF THE FINDINGS

Our results highlight the necessity of adequate counseling and intensive pregnancy monitoring for AH individuals and their families.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S)

This work was supported by grants from the National Key Research & Developmental Program of China (2022YFC2703800), the Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province (ZR2022MH009), and Projects of Medical and Health Technology Development Program in Shandong Province (202005010520, 202005010523). There are no conflicts of interest to declare.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

N/A.

An Overview of Endometrial Cancer with Novel Therapeutic Strategies

Endometrial cancer (EC) stands as the most prevalent gynecologic malignancy. In the past, it was classified based on its hormone sensitivity. However, The Cancer Genome Atlas has categorized EC into four groups, which offers a more objective and reproducible classification and has been shown to have prognostic and therapeutic implications. Hormonally driven EC arises from a precursor lesion known as endometrial hyperplasia, resulting from unopposed estrogen. EC is usually diagnosed through biopsy, followed by surgical staging unless advanced disease is expected. The typical staging consists of a hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy and sentinel lymph node biopsies, with a preference placed on a minimally invasive approach. The stage of the disease is the most significant prognostic marker. However, factors such as age, histology, grade, myometrial invasion, lymphovascular space invasion, tumor size, peritoneal cytology, hormone receptor status, ploidy and markers, body mass index, and the therapy received all contribute to the prognosis. Treatment is tailored based on the stage and the risk of recurrence. Radiotherapy is primarily used in the early stages, and chemotherapy can be added if high-grade histology or advanced-stage disease is present. The risk of EC recurrence increases with advances in stage. Among the recurrences, vaginal cases exhibit the most favorable response to treatment, typically for radiotherapy. Conversely, the treatment of widespread recurrence is currently palliative and is best managed with chemotherapy or hormonal agents. Most recently, immunotherapy has emerged as a promising treatment for advanced and recurrent EC.

Radiomics-based fertility-sparing treatment in endometrial carcinoma: a review

In recent years, with the increasing incidence of endometrial carcinoma in women of child-bearing age, to decision of whether to preserve patients' fertility during treatment has become increasingly complex, presenting a formidable challenge for both physicians and patients. Non-fertility-sparing treatment can remove lesions more thoroughly than fertility-sparing treatment. However, patients will permanently lose their fertility. In contrast, fertility-sparing treatment can treat tumors without impairing fertility, but the risk of disease progression is high as compared with non-fertility-sparing treatment. Therefore, it is extremely important to accurately identify patients who are suitable for fertility-sparing treatments. The evaluation of prognostic factors, including myometrial invasion, the presence of lymph node metastases, and histopathological type, is vital for determining whether a patient can receive fertility-sparing treatment. As a non-invasive and quantitative approach, radiomics has the potential to assist radiologists and other clinicians in determining more precise judgments with regard to the above factors by extracting imaging features and establishing predictive models. In this review, we summarized currently available fertility-sparing strategies and reviewed the performance of radiomics in predicting risk factors associated with fertility-sparing treatment. This review aims to assist clinicians in identifying patients suitable for fertility-sparing treatment more accurately and comprehensively and informs more appropriate and rigorous treatment decisions for endometrial cancer patients of child-bearing age.Critical relevance statement: Radiomics is a promising tool that may assist clinicians identify risk factors about fertility-sparing more accurately and comprehensively.

Medical Management of Atypical Endometrial Hyperplasia: Oncological and Reproductive Outcomes at a Tertiary Center in Singapore

Background Medical management of atypical endometrial hyperplasia (AEH) includes oral or intrauterine progestins. This study aims to evaluate the oncological and reproductive outcomes of these patients and the predictive factors for disease regression, as well as to compare the treatment efficacy of different forms of progestins. Methodology This retrospective study was conducted at KK Women's and Children's Hospital, Singapore. Women diagnosed with AEH on endometrial biopsy between January 2015 to October 2017 and treated with at least eight weeks of the same progestin were included for analysis. Results Of the 42 patients who met the inclusion criteria, 37 were treated with oral progestins and five with the levonorgestrel intrauterine device (LNG-IUS). In total, 28 (66.6%) patients achieved complete regression (CR), but eight recurred with AEH or endometrial carcinoma. Four (9.5%) progressed to grade 1 endometrioid adenocarcinoma. Patients under 39 years old were 9.75 times more likely (95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.12-85.16, p = 0.04) to achieve CR compared to those who were 40 years old and above. In multivariate analysis, older age and higher mean body mass index had a significantly lower chance of CR. The probability of CR plateaued at nine months at 0.63 (95% CI = 0.47-0.79). There was no significant difference in time to regression, chance of regression, and risk of recurrence between oral progestin and LNG-IUS. Nine patients were trying to conceive. The clinical pregnancy rate was 44.4% (n = 4), and the live birth rate was 22.2% (n = 2). Conclusions Younger patients, especially those below 39 years old, are more likely to achieve CR. The value of medical treatment beyond nine months needs to be re-evaluated. There was no difference in treatment outcomes between oral progestins and LNG-IUS.

Efficacy of Oral Medications or Intrauterine Device-Delivered Progestin in Patients with Endometrial Hyperplasia with or without Atypia: A Network Meta-Analysis

The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the efficacy of oral medication or intrauterine device-delivered progestins in patients with endometrial hyperplasia (EH) with or without atypia. We systematically examined PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and clinicaltrials.gov to identify studies reporting the regression rate of patients with EH who received progestins or non-progestins. The regression rates after different treatments were compared using a network meta-analysis in terms of the relative ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Begg-Mazumdar rank correlation and funnel plots were performed to evaluate the publication bias. Five non-randomized studies and 21 randomized controlled trials involving 2268 patients were included in the network meta-analysis. The levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) was associated with a higher regression rate than medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) (RR 1.30, 95% CI 1.16-1.46) in patients with EH. Among those without atypia, the LNG-IUS was associated with a higher regression rate than any of the three types of oral medications (MPA, norethisterone, or dydrogesterone (DGT)) (RR 1.35, 95% CI 1.18-1.55). According to the network meta-analysis, combining the LNG-IUS with MPA or metformin increased regression rate, while DGT was associated with the highest regression rate among all oral medications. The LNG-IUS may be the best choice for patients with EH, and combining it with MPA or metformin may further improve its efficacy. DGT may be the preferred choice for patients who are unwilling to use the LNG-IUS or who cannot tolerate its side effects.

Acceptability of bariatric surgery in people with endometrial cancer and atypical hyperplasia: A qualitative study

OBJECTIVE

In young individuals with obesity, infertility, and endometrial cancer, significant, sustained weight loss through bariatric surgery may result in a durable oncologic and reproductive response. However, it is not known whether bariatric surgery is acceptable to this patient population. We performed a qualitative study to understand the acceptability of bariatric surgery in young individuals with obesity and endometrial cancer or atypical hyperplasia.

STUDY DESIGN

All participants were of reproductive age with body mass index [BMI] ≥ 35 and grade 1 endometrial cancer or atypical hyperplasia. Semi-structured interviews were used to explore participant perception of their weight, fertility, and the possibility of bariatric surgery as part of the treatment strategy for their endometrial cancer/atypical hyperplasia. Thematic saturation was reached after 14 interviews.

RESULTS

Fourteen participants with a median age of 34 years (range 27-38) and BMI of 42 (33-64) were interviewed. Participants were reluctant to accept bariatric surgery as a treatment option due to 1) lack of knowledge about the procedure, 2) stigma attached to bariatric surgery, and 3) fear of the risks associated with bariatric surgery. Their perception towards their weight, fertility, and cancer diagnosis was characterized by concepts of 'helplessness', 'isolation', 'frustration', and 'guilt'. We observed a significant gap in participant understanding of the complex interplay between their cancer, infertility, and obesity.

CONCLUSIONS

More support and resources are required, with patient-oriented counseling focused on the implication of their weight on their cancer diagnosis and fertility, before presenting bariatric surgery as a treatment option.

Trends and characteristics of fertility-sparing treatment for atypical endometrial hyperplasia and endometrial cancer in Japan: a survey by the Gynecologic Oncology Committee of the Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to examine the current trends in fertility-sparing (FS) treatment for young atypical endometrial hyperplasia (AEH) and endometrial cancer (EC) patients in Japan.

METHODS

This study was conducted by the Committee on Gynecologic Oncology of the Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology (JSOG) in the 2017-2018 fiscal year. A nationwide, retrospective questionnaire-style survey-as performed. We collected the data of 413 patients from 102 JSOG gynecological cancer registered institutions.

RESULTS

FS treatment was performed with medroxyprogesterone (MPA) (87.2%) or MPA + metformin (11.6%). Pathological complete remission (CR) after initial treatment was achieved in 78.2% of patients. The significant clinicopathological factors correlated to CR after initial treatment were histology (AEH vs. endometrioid carcinoma grade 1 [ECG1]), body mass index (BMI) (<25 vs. ≥25 kg/m²), and treatment period (<6 vs) ≥6 months). ECG1, time to complete remission (TTCR) ≥6 months, maintenance therapy (-), and pregnancy (-) were associated with a significantly higher risk of recurrence on multivariate analysis. The total pregnancy rate was 47%, and the live birth rate was 24%. Patients who received infertility treatments showed a higher live birth rate (50.6%) than those who did not (7)7%).

CONCLUSION

In this survey, we confirmed that FS treatment in Japan is centered on MPA alone and in combination with metformin, and that the treatment efficacy is similar to that reported in previous reports. A multicenter survey study in Japan showed FS treatment for young AEH and EC patients in compliance with the indications is feasible.

Conservative Management of Atypical Endometrial Hyperplasia and Early Endometrial Cancer in Childbearing Age Women

Total hysterectomy and bilateral adnexectomy is the standard treatment for atypical endometrial hyperplasia and early-stage endometrial cancer. However, the recommended surgical treatment precludes future pregnancy when these conditions are diagnosed in women in their fertile age. In these patients, fertility-sparing treatment may be feasible if the desire for childbearing is consistent and specific conditions are present. This review summarizes the available evidence on fertility-sparing management for atypical endometrial hyperplasia and early-stage endometrial cancer. Historically, oral progestins have been the mainstay of conservative management for atypical endometrial hyperplasia and stage IA endometrioid endometrial cancer with no myometrial invasion, although there is no consensus on dosage and treatment length. Intrauterine progestin therapy has proved a valid alternative option when oral progestins are not tolerated. GnRH analogs, metformin, and hysteroscopic resection in combination with progestins appear to increase the overall efficacy of the treatment. After a complete response, conception is recommended; alternatively, maintenance therapy with strict follow-up has been proposed to decrease recurrence. The risk of disease progression is not negligible, and clinicians should not overlook the risk of hereditary forms of the disease in young patients, in particular, Lynch syndrome. Hysterectomy is performed once the desire for childbearing desire has been established. The conservative management of atypical endometrial hyperplasia and early-stage endometrial cancer is feasible, provided a strong desire for childbearing and permitting clinical-pathological conditions. However, patients must be aware of the need for a strict follow-up and the risk of progression with a possible consequent worsening of the prognosis. More homogenous and well-designed studies are necessary to standardize and identify the best treatment and follow-up protocols.

Endometrial hyperplasia as a risk factor of endometrial cancer

Endometrial hyperplasia (EH) is the precursor lesion for endometrioid adenocarcinoma of the endometrium (EC), which represents the most common malignancy of the female reproductive tract in industrialized countries. The most important risk factor for the development of EH is chronic exposure to unopposed estrogen. Histopathologically, EH can be classified into EH without atypia (benign EH) and atypical EH/endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia (EIN). Clinical management ranges from surveillance or progestin therapy through to hysterectomy, depending on the risk of progression to or concomitant EC and the patient´s desire to preserve fertility. Multiple studies support the efficacy of progestins in treating both benign and atypical EH. This review summarizes the evidence base regarding risk factors and management of EH. Additionally, we performed a systematic literature search of the databases PubMed and Cochrane Controlled Trials register for studies analyzing the efficacy of progestin treatment in women with EH.

A Prospective Cohort Study of Metformin as an Adjuvant Therapy for Infertile Women With Endometrial Complex Hyperplasia/Complex Atypical Hyperplasia and Their Subsequent Assisted Reproductive Technology Outcomes

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the adjuvant efficacy of metformin treatment to achieve pathological complete response (CR) in patients with endometrial complex hyperplasia (CH) and complex atypical hyperplasia (CAH), and secondarily, to evaluate their pregnancy outcomes after following assisted reproductive technology (ART).

STUDY DESIGN

This prospective cohort study analyzed 219 patients diagnosed with infertility and CH/CAH from January 2016 to December 2020. Among these patients, 138 were assigned to the control group (progesterone alone) and 81 were assigned to the study group (progesterone+metformin). After 8/12 weeks of therapy, the treatment responses were assessed by histological examination of curettage specimens obtained by hysteroscopy. Once the pathological results indicated CR, the patients were able to receive ART. The ART treatment and follow-up data of these patients were collected and analyzed.

RESULTS

116 patients in the control group achieved CR, compared with 76 patients in the study group. The CR rate in the control group was significantly lower than that in the study group (P=0.034). We then divided the patients into subgroups to compare the treatment responses. In the subgroup analyses, patients with body mass index (BMI) ≥25 kg/m² and patients with polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) had higher CR rates in the metformin group compared with the control group (P=0.015, P=0.028 respectively). Subsequently, 68 patients in the control group and 47 patients in the study group received an ART cycle. We examined the pregnancy indications and found no significant differences in the clinical pregnancy rate and live birth rate between the two groups (P>0.05).

CONCLUSION

Regression of CH/CAH may be improved by progesterone+metformin compared with progesterone alone. The effect was particularly pronounced in patients with BMI ≥25 kg/m² and patients with PCOS. Metformin had no obvious effect on subsequent ART outcomes. The trial is registered on the publicly accessible website.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

http://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.aspx?proj=15372, identifier ChiCTR-ONR-16009078.

The role of prolonged progestin treatment and factors predicting successful fertility-sparing treatment for early endometrial endometrioid adenocarcinoma

OBJECTIVE

Fertility-sparing progestin therapy is highly effective in selected young women with endometrial cancer. In present study, we attempted to evaluate the role of prolonged medication and identify factors predicting successful treatment, and also assess fertility outcomes among young women with early stage endometrial endometrioid carcinoma (EC).

STUDY DESIGN

We retrospectively reviewed clinical data from patients aged <45 years with well-differentiated EC at presumed stage IA (without myometrial invasion) who wished to preserve fertility. They were managed with oral progestin at Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital between June 2005 and June 2019.

RESULTS

Forty-five patients were included with a median follow-up of 53.5 months (range 12-170 months). Forty-one patients (91.1%) had complete remission, the cumulative complete response (CR) rates at 3, 6, 9, 12, and >12 months were 17.7%, 48.9%, 60.0%, 68.9% and 91.1%, respectively. Among the 41 responders, 23 attempted to conceive and nine (39.1%) achieved pregnancy with 12 live newborn infants. Eleven (27.5%) responders experienced recurrence at a median of 22 months from CR (range 3-54 months). Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that non-diabetes (HR: 4.59; 95% CI: 1.62-12.98) and endometrial thickness <2 cm (HR: 0.39; 95% CI: 1.41-17.67) were significantly factors associated with treatment response.

CONCLUSIONS

We concluded that prolonged oral progestin treatment was possible with a certain proportion of responders (24.4%) being responded after one year. Diabetes controlled on metformin and endometrial thickness <2 cm could be used as surrogate markers to predict better treatment response.

Fertility-Sparing Treatment of Patients with Endometrial Cancer: A Review of the Literature

Endometrial cancer (EC) is currently the most common malignancy of the female genital tract in developed countries. Although it is more common in postmenopausal women, it may affect up to 25% in the premenopausal age and 3–5% under the age of 40 years. Furthermore, in the last decades a significant shift to pregnancy at older maternal ages, particularly in resource-rich countries, has been observed. Therefore, in this scenario fertility-sparing alternatives should be discussed with patients affected by EC. This study summarizes available literature on fertility-sparing management of patients affected by EC, focusing on the oncologic and reproductive outcomes. A systematic computerized search of the literature was performed in two electronic databases (PubMed and MEDLINE) in order to identify relevant articles to be included for the purpose of this systematic review. On the basis of available evidence, fertility-sparing alternatives are oral progestins alone or in combination with other drugs, levonorgestrel intrauterine system and hysteroscopic resection in association with progestin therapies. These strategies seem feasible and safe for young patients with G1 endometrioid EC limited to the endometrium. However, there is a lack of high-quality evidence on the efficacy and safety of fertility-sparing treatments and future well-designed studies are required.

«VULNERABLE» ENDOMETRIUM: A MODERN VIEW ON THE PATHOGENESIS AND PATHOGENETIC THERAPY OF ENDOMETRIAL HYPERPLASTIC PROCESSES

Relevance: Endometrium is a unique human tissue with a strong regenerative potential which is implemented after desquamation during each menstrual cycle. At that, regeneration in the endometrium is not accompanied by scarring. Endometrial hyperplasia as a variant of defect transformation is a widespread disease which remains an urgent problem of modern medicine. In recent years, endometrial hyperplasia is becoming more common among patients of reproductive age. This problem is even more significant due to the spread of endometrial cancer in developed countries, and endometrial hyperplasia being its precursor. Purpose: The article describes modern views on the pathogenesis and pathogenetic therapy of endometrial hyperplastic processes. Materials and Methods: Sources available in the Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane databases were analyzed and international reviews of randomized controlled studies in that area were selected for the last few years using the keywords «endometrial hyperplasia,» «atypical hyperplasia,» «endometrial cancer,» «progestins,» and «hysterectomy.» Results: The article discusses the modern ideas about etiopathogenesis and the tactics of management of patients, according to the data of foreign literature. Conclusion: Early diagnostics and timely treatment of endometrial hyperplasiaare an important preventive factor due to the high risk of malignancy. The patient management algorithm depends on many factors: the type of hyperplastic conditions, the patient’s age, unrealized reproductive function, and etc. Progestin therapy is more preferable for young patients wishing to preserve reproductive function. If cellular atypia is present, panhysterectomy is the first line of treatment for women who have realized their reproductive function and have endometrial hyperplasia with atypia.

Effectiveness of Megestrol for the Treatment of Patients with Atypical Endometrial Hyperplasia or Endometrial Endometrioid Adenocarcinoma (Stage IA, Well Differentiated)

Objective:

We aimed to evaluate treatment responses and recurrence rate of atypical endometrial hyperplasia (AEH) and endometrial endometrioid adenocarcinoma (EA) with Stage IA Grade 1 to megestrol in Iranian patients who are candidates for medical treatments.

Methods:

In a retrospective cohort study that was conducted on 50 patients with AEH and 22 patients with EA who were referred to the oncology clinic of Imam Khomeini Hospital, Tehran, Iran, during 2006–2016, we recruited all patients with AEH or EA of Stage IA Grade 1 and their disease was diagnosed during endometrial curettage with or without hysteroscopy. Patients were initially treated with 160 mg of megestrol daily, along with aspirin up to 3 months, and then after 3–4 weeks of discharge of the drugs, patients underwent curettage with hysteroscopy.

Findings:

The patients with AEH had 31 complete responses and five progressive diseases, and the patients with EA had seven complete responses and seven progressive diseases. After treatment, 25 cases with AEH and 5 cases with EA had an intention to get pregnant, whereas eight patients with AEH and 1 case with endometrial cancer became pregnant. Recurrence occurred in the 2 cases with AEH and 2 cases with endometrial cancer which the time of recurrence in the patients with AEH was longer than in patients with endometrial cancer (P = 0.011).

Conclusion:

Megestrol is an effective therapeutic agent in endometrial hyperplasia or low-grade endometrial cancer patients who are willing to conserve their childbearing.

The results of different fertility-sparing treatment modalities and obstetric outcomes in patients with early endometrial cancer and atypical endometrial hyperplasia: Case series of 30 patients and systematic review

OBJECTIVE

Increasing incidence of endometrial cancer and late motherhood enhance conservative management in clinical practice. Although different approaches to fertility-sparing treatment are possible, it is still unknown which patients will benefit more from systemic or local treatment. Aim of this paper is to analyze the effectiveness of different methods of conservative management and obstetric outcomes in patients with early endometrial cancer and atypical endometrial hyperplasia.

STUDY DESIGN

30 patients (10 with atypical endometrial hyperplasia, 20 with endometrial cancer) treated conservatively were included to retrospective analysis. 24 patients receiving progestins were divided into 2 groups according to the dose (low and high dose); 6 patients were treated with levonorgestrel releasing intrauterine device. Effectiveness of therapy (complete, partial or absent) and obstetric outcomes (number of pregnancies and live births) were assessed. Electronic databases (MEDLINE, Web of Science, Embase) were searched for articles according to criteria: 1) fertility-sparing treatment of endometrial cancer/atypical endometrial hyperplasia in patients of reproductive age, 2) assessment of pregnancy/obstetric results. The risk of bias was assessed with the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Critical Appraisal Checklist for Case Series.

RESULTS

Complete and partial remission were achieved in 21 and 3 patients, respectively. 6 patients did not respond to treatment. Relapse was diagnosed in 6 patients. Probability of complete remission according to low-, high-dose regimen and levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device were 55.6% (46.5%-64.7%), 73.3% (65.2%-81.4%) and 83.3% (76.5%-90.1%) respectively. 4 patients get pregnant and 3 of them born children. 25 studies (21 retrospective, 4 prospective) with 812 participants were included in the systematic review. The most studied was progestin based treatment. Complete and partial response to fertility-sparing management was diagnosed in 634 and 38 patients, respectively. Relapse was diagnosed in 170 patients. Median times of follow-up range from 17 (1-45) to 98 (35-176) months. The total number of pregnancies and live births were 352 and 246, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Fertility-sparing treatment is a safe method of management in young women with endometrial cancer/atypical endometrial hyperplasia. While the main goal of conservative management is preserving the possibility of having children, only a small number of women will become pregnant and give birth.

Optimal duration of fertility-sparing hormonal treatment for early-stage endometrioid endometrial cancer

OBJECTIVES

To analyze the oncologic outcomes of long-term fertility-sparing treatment (FST) in patients with early-stage endometrial cancer (EC) and to determine the optimal duration of FST that would not hamper survival outcomes.

METHODS

Patients undergoing FST for presumed stage IA, grade 1 EC between 2005 and 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. Oncologic outcomes were compared between the group with ≤6 months of FST and the group with >6 months of FST. Segmented regression analysis was used to estimate the dynamic changes in cumulative complete response (CR) rates according to FST duration.

RESULTS

A total of 122 patients received oral progestin, with concurrent levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device use in 108 (88.5%) and 105 (86.1%) achieved CR with a median time to achieve CR of 10 (3-42) months. Of the patients not achieving CR at 6 months of FST, 95.1% (78/82) continued further FST. The overall CR rate (88.9% [32/36] vs. 84.9% [73/86], P = 0.436] was not significantly different between the groups with ≤6 and > 6 months of FST. The changes in cumulative CR rates were significantly different between the two segments divided by 15 months from the initial FST (P = 0.0015, segmented regression analysis). The overall progressive disease (PD) rate was 3.3% (4/122), and PD was first detected during 9-12 months of FST.

CONCLUSION

Patients not achieving CR and not showing PD at 6 months of FST could continue further FST. If disease progression is excluded, 15 months of FST can be considered as the cutoff for the optimal FST duration.

Fertility issue in early stage endometrial cancer patients

Endometrial cancer (EC) is the most common cancer of the female reproductive system in developed countries. The incidence of EC has been increasing in young women. Approximately 4% of cases are aged <40 years. These young women may wish to delay therapy until after they have children. Common complaints in patients with EC include irregular vaginal bleeding, pelvic pain, and enlarged uterus. Imaging techniques such as transvaginal ultrasound (TVUS) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can be utilized in detecting EC. Although the recommended treatment of EC is hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy with or without systemic lymph node dissection, loss of reproductive function is the primary limiting factor of this surgical approach. Some studies have reported favorable results with high-dose oral progestins or levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system or hysteroscopic tumor resection followed by treatment with high-dose oral progestins. The most widely utilized medical treatment regimens are medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) 250–600 mg/day or megestrol acetate (MA) 160–480 mg/day. However, there is still a lack of evidence to establish the optimal dose and duration of progestin treatment. Patients with complete remission (CR) who wish to conceive must be encouraged, and referral to a fertility clinic should be offered as soon as possible. The key aspect of fertility-sparing management in women with EC appears to be the selection of appropriate candidates. Owing to the rarity of this condition, management may often be suboptimal. The aim of this review is to assess the current approaches to management of young women with EC who wish to preserve their fertility.

Fertility Sparing Treatment of Endometrial Cancer with and without Initial Infiltration of Myometrium: A Single Center Experience

Simple Summary

Endometrial cancer is the most common malignancy of the female genital tract, and in 14% of cases, is diagnosed in premenopausal women, While, the cancer appears in 5% in women of childbearing age. Preserving fertility in these women should be the goal of cancer practice. The aim of our study is to describe pregnancy outcomes of our center in women with G1 endometrial endometrioid cancer and atypical endometrial hyperplasia/endometrial intraepithelial neoplasm undergone conservative treatment. Moreover, for the first time, obstetric and oncological outcomes are described in a long follow up, including women with minimal myometrial infiltration.

Abstract

Endometrial cancer (EC) is the fourth largest female cancer in Europe and North America. In 5% of cases, the diagnosis is made in women who wish to become pregnant. In our retrospective study, we reported our experience about fertility sparing treatment of G1 endometrioid endometrial cancer (G1 EEC) or atypical endometrial hyperplasia/endometrial intraepithelial neoplasm (AEH/EIN) in young women desiring pregnancy treated in our Center. Conservative treatment was based on operative hysteroscopy and hormone therapy with megestrol acetate (160 mg/die for 9 months). For the first time we included women with G1 EEC with minimal myometrial infiltration. The minimum follow-up period was two years and consisted of serial outpatient hysteroscopies with endometrial biopsies. Among the 36 women with G1 EEC we observed one case of disease persistence and four recurrences and four recurrences among the 46 women diagnosed with AEH/EIN. To date, 35 live births were obtained in both groups. Our results advance the hypothesis that conservative treatment can represent a safe and feasible alternative to propose to young women with desire for pregnancy. Further randomized and multicentric studies are needed to arrive at unambiguous and standardized guidelines on the surgical and medical treatment of young women with EEC or AEH/EIN.

Continued medical treatment for persistent early endometrial cancer in young women

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to investigate the effectiveness of continuing medical therapy in patients who did not achieve complete response (CR) despite 9 months of progestin treatment. We also sought to determine the prognostic factors associated with achieving CR among these patients.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 51 patients with presumed stage IA, grade 1 or 2 endometrioid adenocarcinoma who had persistent disease on biopsy performed at 9-12 months after at least 9 months of progestin-based therapy. Data on clinicopathological factors and oncological and obstetrical outcomes following continuous hormonal treatment were extracted from the patients' medical records and analyzed. Univariate and multivariate analyses for predicting CR were performed.

RESULTS

Thirty-seven (72.5%) of 51 patients achieved CR after prolonged fertility-sparing treatment. Median time to CR from starting initial progestin was 17.3 months (range, 12.1-91.7 months). On univariate analysis, history of polycystic ovarian syndrome, histologic grade 2, and not achieving partial response (PR) until 12 months were significantly associated with failure to CR (odds ratio [OR], 6.188, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.405-27.244, p = 0.018; OR, 9.722, 95% CI, 1.614-58.581, p = 0.013; and OR, 21.750, 95% CI, 4.016-117.783, p < 0.001, respectively). Multivariate analysis revealed that not achieving PR until 12 months was an independent prognostic factor predicting failure to CR after prolonged progestin therapy (OR, 21.803, 95% CI, 3.601-132.025, p = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Continued medical treatment is effective for persistent early endometrial carcinoma after at least 9 months of progestin therapy in young women who want to preserve their fertility.

Fertility-sparing management for endometrial cancer: review of the literature

INTRODUCTION

Primary surgery is effective in low-risk endometrial cancer (EC). However, in young women, this approach compromises fertility. Therefore, fertility-sparing management in the case of atypical endometrial hyperplasia, or grade 1 EC limited to the endometrium can be considered.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

We performed a literature review to identify studies involving women with EC or atypical hyperplasia who underwent fertility-sparing management. We conducted multiple bibliographic databases research from their inception to May 2020.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Oral therapy with medroxyprogesterone acetate and megestrol acetate is recommended based on extensive experience, although without consensus on dosages and treatment length. The pooled complete response rate, recurrence rate, and pregnancy rate of EC were 76.3%, 30.7% and 52.1%, respectively. Endometrial hyperplasia was associated with better outcomes. LNG-IUSs appears an alternative treatment, particularly in patients who do not tolerate oral therapy. In a randomized controlled trial, megestrol acetate plus metformin guaranteed an earlier complete response rate than megestrol acetate alone for endometrial hyperplasia. Hysteroscopic resection followed by progestogens is associated with a higher complete response rate, live birth rate, and lower recurrence rate than oral progestogens alone. Pooled complete response, recurrence, and live birth rates were 98.1%, 4.8% and 52.6%.

CONCLUSIONS

Fertility preservation appears feasible in young patients with grade 1 EC limited to the endometrium or atypical endometrial hyperplasia. Progestins are the mainstay of such management. The addition of Metformin and hysteroscopic resection seems to provide some improvements. However, fertility preservation is not the standard approach for staging and treatment, potentially worsening oncologic outcomes.

Fertility considerations prior to conservative management of gynecologic cancers

Fertility-sparing management of early-stage gynecologic cancers is becoming more prevalent as increasing evidence demonstrates acceptable oncologic and reproductive outcomes in appropriately selected patients. However, in the absence of randomized controlled trials, most of the commonly used treatment algorithms are based only on observational studies. As women are increasingly postponing childbearing, the need for evidence-based guidance on the optimal selection of appropriate candidates for fertility-sparing therapies is paramount. It is imperative to seriously consider the fertility potential of a given individual prior to making major oncologic treatment decisions that may deviate from the accepted standard of care. It is a disservice to patients to undergo a fertility-sparing procedure in hopes of ultimately achieving a live birth, only to determine later they have poor baseline fertility potential or other substantial barriers to conception including excess financial toxicity. Many women with oncologic diagnoses are of advanced maternal age and their obstetric and neonatal risks must be considered. In the era of advanced assisted reproductive technologies, patients should be provided realistic expectations regarding success rates while understanding the potential oncologic perils. A multidisciplinary approach to the conservative treatment of early-stage gynecologic cancers with early referral to reproductive specialists as well as maternal-fetal medicine specialists is warranted. In this review, we discuss the recommended fertility evaluation for patients with newly diagnosed, early-stage gynecologic cancers who are considering fertility-sparing management.

Concurrent and future risk of endometrial cancer in women with endometrial hyperplasia: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

To inform treatment decisions in women diagnosed with endometrial hyperplasia, quantification of the potential for concurrent endometrial cancer and the future risk of progression to cancer is required.

METHODS

We identified studies up to September 2018 that reported on the prevalence of concurrent cancer (within three months of endometrial hyperplasia diagnosis), or the incidence of cancer, identified at least three months after hyperplasia diagnosis. Random-effects meta-analyses produced pooled estimates and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

RESULTS

A total of 36 articles were identified; 15 investigating concurrent and 21 progression to cancer. In pooled analysis of 11 studies of atypical hyperplasia, the pooled prevalence of concurrent endometrial cancer was 32.6% (95% CI: 24.1%, 42.4%) while no studies evaluated concurrent cancer in non-atypical hyperplasia. The risk of progression to cancer was high in atypical hyperplasia (n = 5 studies, annual incidence rate = 8.2%, 95% CI 3.9%, 17.3%) and only one study reported on non-atypical hyperplasia (annual incidence rate = 2.6%, 95% CI: 0.6%, 10.6%).

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, a third of women with atypical hyperplasia had concurrent endometrial cancer, although the number of studies, especially population-based, is small. Progression to cancer in atypical hyperplasia was high, but few studies were identified. Population-based estimates are required, in both atypical and non-atypical hyperplasia patients to better inform treatment strategies.

Weight control is vital for patients with early-stage endometrial cancer or complex atypical hyperplasia who have received progestin therapy to spare fertility: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Objectives: This study aimed to identify potential prognostic factors for patients with complex atypical hyperplasia (CAH) or early-stage endometrial cancer (EC) who received progestin therapy to spare fertility and, thus, improve the management of this patient group. Materials and methods: The PubMed, PMC, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases were searched for correlational studies published in English. Studies that evaluated the prognosis of patients with CAH or early-stage EC were pooled for a systematic review and meta-analysis. Results: In total, 31 eligible studies, including 8 prospective and 23 retrospective studies involving 1099 patients, were included in this analysis. The most commonly used progestin agents were medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA, 47.0%) and megestrol acetate (MA, 25.5%). The total complete response (CR) rate was 75.8% (833/1099), and the median time to CR with first-line progestin therapy was 6 months. In total, 294 (26.8%) patients who achieved CR became pregnant spontaneously (28 cases) or through assisted reproductive technology (127 cases). During the median follow-up of 39 months, 245 (22.3%) women developed recurrence. Only one patient (0.09%) died of the disease. The meta-analysis showed that compared to a BMI<25 kg/m² and CAH, a body mass index (BMI) ≥25 kg/m² (P=0.0004, odds ratios (OR), 0.4; 95% confidence interval, 0.3-0.6) and EC (P=0.0000, OR, 0.3; 95% confidence interval, 0.2-0.6) were significantly associated with a higher likelihood of a CR. Patients with a BMI≥25 kg/m² (P=0.0007, OR, 2.5; 95% confidence interval, 1.4-4.3), PCOS (P=0.0006, OR, 3.4; 95% confidence interval, 1.5-7.9), and EC (P=0.0344, OR, 2.8; 95% confidence interval, 1.4-5.3) had a significantly higher risk of recurrence. Conclusion: In general, patients with CAH or early-stage EC who were treated with progesterone therapy had a favorable prognosis. However, the recurrence risk was not insignificant. Weight control is crucial for improving the clinical management of this patient group.

Impact of treatment duration in fertility-preserving management of endometrial cancer or atypical endometrial hyperplasia

Objective

Fertility preservation is an option for selected patients with endometrial hyperplasia or cancer. This study aimed to evaluate whether duration of treatment impacts the oncologic and reproductive outcomes.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed patients diagnosed with endometrial cancer/atypical endometrial hyperplasia who underwent fertility-sparing treatment from January 2012 to December 2016. As the duration of treatment required by the patients was different, the patients who achieved a complete response were grouped according to the treatment duration as groups A (≤6 months), B (6–9 months), and C (>9 months).

Results

With the prolongation of treatment duration from 6 months to 9 months to >9 months, the accumulative complete response rates for 67 patients were 58%, 76%, and 95.5%, respectively. Among groups A, B, and C there was no significant difference in the relapse rates (21.1%, 25%, and 36.4%, respectively, p=0.60) or the median time interval to relapse (14, 13, and 13.5 months, respectively, p=0.90). Maintenance treatment was an independent protective factor for recurrence (p=0.001), while the complication of diabetes was an independent risk factor for recurrence (p=0.03). Fertility rates (31%, 18.2%, and 62.5%, respectively, p=0.12) and the time interval to pregnancy (14, 13, and 8 months, respectively, p=0.67) were not significantly different among the three groups. Assisted reproductive technology was positively associated with a higher pregnancy rate (p=0.02) and a body mass index ≥25 kg/m2 was negatively associated with the pregnancy rate (p=0.047).

Conclusions

Longer treatment duration was associated with higher rates of complete response. Longer treatment duration (>9 months) was not associated with a decrease in success rates of pregnancy.

A pilot study of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist combined with aromatase inhibitor as fertility-sparing treatment in obese patients with endometrial cancer

Objective

This study aims to evaluate the effects and pregnancy outcomes of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRH agonist) combined with aromatase inhibitor (AI) in preserving the fertility of obese women with grade 1 endometrial cancer (EC).

Methods

This study recruited obese EC patients who wished to preserve their fertility. The treatment regimen consisted of intramuscular GnRH agonist 3.75 mg every 4 weeks and oral AI 2.5 mg daily. The maintenance regimen was the same as the initial treatment regimen. Primary outcomes included response rate, time to complete response (CR), and time to recurrence; pregnancy outcomes included the time to pregnancy, pregnancy rate and live birth rate.

Results

Six obese patients with EC were included in this study, with the age (mean±standard deviation [SD]) of 30.5±3.3 years and body mass index (mean±SD) of 35.0±1.4 kg/m². CR rate was 100%, and time to CR was 3–6 months. None of the patients had recurrence after a median follow-up of 4.0 years (range, 1.3–7.0 years). The most common side effects were menopause-like symptoms. Among these patients, no weight gain was observed during treatment. The pregnancy rate and live birth rate was 50.0% and 75.0%, respectively, with a median time to pregnancy of 2.4 years (range, 1.0–5.5 years).

Conclusion

The combination of GnRH agonist and AI demonstrated promising long-term effect in young obese EC patients who wished to preserve their fertility. No weight gain side effects were observed. Further studies with a larger sample size are needed to fully evaluate this novel treatment regimen.

Treatment efficiency of comprehensive hysteroscopic evaluation and lesion resection combined with progestin therapy in young women with endometrial atypical hyperplasia and endometrial cancer

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of comprehensive hysteroscopic evaluation and lesion resection combined with progestin therapy in young patients with endometrial atypical hyperplasia (EAH) and early stage endometrial cancer (EEC) who wished to preserve their fertility.

METHODS

Patients with EAH (n = 120) or well-differentiated EEC (n = 40, FIGO stage IA, without myometrial invasion) were retrospectively included. All patients received constant oral progestin combined with hysteroscopic evaluation every 3 months until achieving complete response (CR). The location, number and size of each suspected lesion or cluster were detailly recorded during the hysteroscopy.

RESULTS

The median age was 32.0 year-old (range, 22-47 year-old). Totally 148 patients (97.4%) achieved CR while 3 EAH and 1 EEC patients presented with disease progression, and 8 patients were still in treatment. The mean treatment duration for achieving CR was 6.7 ± 0.3 months (range, 1-18 months). After adjusting for patient age, body mass index (BMI), history of pregnancy and type of conservative therapies, lesion size ≤2 cm (OR, 0.701; 95% CI, 0.496-0.991; P = 0.045) was significantly correlated with shorter treatment time to achieve CR. Among 60 patients attempted to conceive after achieving CR, 45.0% (15/60) had been pregnant, 25.0% (15/60) delivered live birth, 13.3% (8/60) are still in pregnancy, while 6.7% experienced spontaneous abortion.

CONCLUSION

Comprehensive hysteroscopic evaluation and lesion resection plus progestin therapy seem to be an effective and safe fertility sparing therapy for patients with EAH or EEC. Endometrial lesion size ≤2 cm correlated with a shorter treatment period to achieve CR.

Fertility Sparing Treatment in Patients With Early Stage Endometrial Cancer, Using a Combination of Surgery and GnRH Agonist: A Monocentric Retrospective Study and Review of the Literature

Objectives: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist after endometrial resection in women suffering early stage endometrial carcinoma (EC) and/or endometrial intra-epithelial neoplasia (EIN). Design: A retrospective review of clinical files between January 1999 and December 2016. Setting: University hospital. Patients: Eighteen women younger than 41 years with grade 1 endometrial carcinoma (G1EC) and/or Endometrial intra-epithelial neoplasia (EIN).

INTERVENTIONS

All patients received GnRH agonist for 3 months after an endometrial resection combined with a laparoscopy to exclude concomitant ovarian tumor and/or other extra-uterine disease. The patient underwent a follow-up of 3 months interval with endometrial sampling by hysteroscopy. Main Outcome Measure(s): The recurrence rate and the pregnancy rate after fertility sparing treatment. Results: We identified 9 patients with EIN (50%), 7 patients with G1EC (38.9%), 1 with combined histology (5.5%), and 1 with G2EC (5.5%). After a median follow-up of 40.7 months, 12 patients conserved their uterus (66.7%), and 8 (53.3%) patients were pregnant with a total of 14 pregnancies among those who tried to become pregnant. We observed a complete response rate in 12 patients (66.7%) but 3 of these patients relapsed (25%). We also found a stable disease in 6 patients (33.3%). Conclusions: Compared with other fertility sparing treatments, GnRH agonist after surgery is an effective fertility-sparing strategy for women with EIN and/or G1EC. We recommend hysterectomy once a family has been completed even if the literature does not clearly lead to radical surgery.

Hysteroscopic Endometrial Focal Resection followed by Levonorgestrel Intrauterine Device Insertion as a Fertility-Sparing Treatment of Atypical Endometrial Hyperplasia and Early Endometrial Cancer: A Retrospective Study

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To evaluate safety and effectiveness of the combination of hysteroscopic endometrial focal resection with levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device (LNG-IUD) for International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage IA G1 early endometrial cancer (EEC) and atypical endometrial hyperplasia (AEH) in young women to preserve their fertility.

DESIGN

Retrospective case series (Canadian Task Force classification II-3).

SETTING

University Federico II, Naples, Italy.

PATIENTS

The medical records of 69 consecutive patients treated from 2007 to 2017 with diagnosis of EEC (n = 14) or AEH (n = 55) meeting inclusion criteria were reviewed.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients with focal EEC were treated by hysteroscopic resection of the lesion according to Mazzon's technique; patients with AEH were treated by superficial endometrial resection, preserving the basal layer of the endometrium. An LNG-IUD was inserted in all patients after surgery. Patients were followed for 24 months with serial hysteroscopic biopsies.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Rates of response, live birth, and recurrence were assessed. Of the 14 patients with EEC, 11 (78.6%) achieved a complete response, 2 (18.2%) of whom had subsequent relapse, 1 (7.1%) showed partial response, whereas 2 (14.3%) were nonresponders (1 stable disease and 1 progression). Of the 55 patients with AEH, 51 (92.7%) achieved a complete response, 2 (3.9%) of whom had subsequent relapse, 3 (5.5%) showed partial response, whereas only 1 (1.8%) was nonresponder with stable disease. Among 25 patients who had removed the LNG-IUD, 10 (40%) gave birth after natural conception in the last 12 months of follow-up.

CONCLUSION

The combination of hysteroscopic resection with an LNG-IUD as fertility-sparing treatment of EEC and AEH showed similar response and live birth rates compared with those reported in literature for progestins alone, but with considerably lower relapse rate. We advocate the use of this combined approach as an alternative fertility-sparing option in patients with ECC and AEH.

Effects of Metformin on Cellular Proliferation and Steroid Hormone Receptors in Patient-Derived, Low-Grade Endometrial Cancer Cell Lines

Endometrial cancer (EC) is the most common gynecologic malignancy and is the result of disruption of the balance between estrogen-stimulated growth and progesterone-induced growth modulation. Metformin has been shown to inhibit EC proliferation; however, its role in early-stage EC and its effects on steroid hormone receptors have not been adequately explored. Our aim was to examine the effects of metformin on cellular proliferation in patient-derived, low-grade EC cell lines and to determine whether it directly modulates steroid hormone receptor expression. Two novel EC cell lines were produced (EM2 and 3) from endometrial tumor tissue obtained from women undergoing surgery. Cellular proliferation was determined by the 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazolyl-2)-2, 5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide assay, and in both cell lines, metformin decreased cell proliferation in a dose-dependent (10-200 µmol/L) manner and induced apoptosis as measured by cleaved PARP. Furthermore, metformin abrogated the effects of E2 on cell proliferation. Using quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction and Western immunoblotting, metformin significantly decreased estrogen receptor (ER) α messenger RNA abundance but did not consistently affect the expression of progesterone receptor. Estrogen receptor α protein levels significantly decreased across all metformin doses tested, which resulted in a significant decrease in the expression of the ER targets genes Keratin-19 and Wnt-1 inducible signaling pathway 2. In addition, metformin increased phosphorylation of AMPK in a dose-dependent manner (10-200 µmol/L) indicating an effect on mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) signaling. Our data suggest that metformin therapy represents a potential fertility-sparing option for women with early-stage EC, given its capacity to inhibit EC cell proliferation, ERα expression, and the mTOR cell proliferation pathway.

Insulin resistance and overweight prolonged fertility-sparing treatment duration in endometrial atypical hyperplasia patients

Objective

Our previous study showed that insulin resistance (IR) was related to endometrial hyperplasia as well as endometrial cancer. But the exact impact of IR on fertility-sparing treatment in endometrial hyperplasic disease is unclear. This study investigated how IR affects fertility-sparing treatment in endometrial atypical hyperplasia (EAH) patients.

Methods

The 151 EAH patients received fertility-sparing treatment were retrospectively investigated. All patients received high-dose progestin combined with hysteroscopy. Therapeutic effects were evaluated by hysteroscopy every 3 months during the treatment.

Results

The median age was 33.0 years old (range, 21–54 years old). Sixty-one patients (40.4%) were insulin resistant. Three patients were excluded from the analysis because they chose hysterectomy within 3 months after initiation of progestin treatment. The 141 out of 148 (95.3%) patients achieved complete response (CR). No difference was found in cumulative CR rate between those with or without IR (90.2% vs. 95.6%, p=0.320). IR significantly affected therapeutic duration to achieve CR (8.1±0.5 months with IR vs. 6.1±0.4 months without IR, p=0.004). Overweight (body mass index [BMI]≥25 kg/m²) was associated with higher risk of treatment failure (odds ratio=5.61; 95% confidence interval=1.11–28.35; p=0.040) and longer therapeutic duration to achieve CR (7.6±0.5 months vs. 6.3±0.4 months, p=0.019). EAH patients with both IR and overweight (IR+BMI+) had the longest therapeutic time compared with other patients (8.8±0.6 months vs. 5.6±0.7, 6.3±0.4, and 6.4±0.8 months for IR−BMI+, IR−BMI−, and IR+BMI−, respectively, p=0.006).

Conclusion

IR and overweight were associated with longer therapeutic duration in EAH patients receiving progestin-based fertility-sparing treatment.

Endometrial Cancer: Is This a New Disease?

The incidence of endometrial cancer is increasing, and the age of onset is younger than in prior years. Although endometrial cancer still occurs more commonly in older women, for whom the mortality rate is increasing, it also is being diagnosed in younger and younger women. The underlying cause of the increase in incidence is the epidemic of obesity and the resulting hyperinsulinemia. Conservative treatment may be indicated for younger women who wish to retain their fertility. Lifestyle modifications such as diet and exercise can modulate the risk of developing endometrial cancer as well as prevent recurrence and other comorbidities associated with obesity.

Oral Progestin Treatment for Early-Stage Endometrial Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of oral progestin treatment for early-stage endometrial cancer.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of the proportions from observational studies. Original studies were selected if patients with early-stage endometrial cancer, especially those of reproductive age, were treated with oral progestin. We conducted searches on studies listed in MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane that were published through June 2014, and relevant articles were also searched. The methodological quality of the included studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa quality assessment scale. Funnel plots and metaregression analyses were used to assess bias.

RESULTS

The final sample included 25 articles involving 445 patients. Based on a random-effects model, patients achieved a disease regression rate of 82.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 75.3%-88.7%), a relapse rate of 25.0% (95% CI, 15.8%-35.2%), a pregnancy rate of 28.8% (95% CI, 22.5%-35.5%), and a live birth rate of 19.6% (95% CI, 12.8%-27.4%). Body weight gain, liver dysfunction, and abnormal blood coagulation test results were the most common treatment-related adverse effects. Only 2 disease-related deaths were reported during the follow-up duration.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the present systematic review and meta-analysis, oral progestin treatment is feasible and safe for patients of reproductive age.

Comparison among fertility-sparing therapies for well differentiated early-stage endometrial carcinoma and complex atypical hyperplasia

OBJECTIVE

To compare fertility-sparing therapies including oral progestogens, hysteroscopic resection (HR), and the levonorgestrel- releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) in achieving disease regression, recurrence and live birth rate in well differentiate early-stage endometrial carcinoma (eEC) and complex atypical hyperplasia(CAH).

STUDY DESIGN

This was a meta-analysis of previous studies focus on the fertility-sparing therapy for well differentiate early-stage endometrial carcinoma (eEC) and complex atypical hyperplasia (CAH).

DATE SOURCES

Medline, the Cochrane Library and Embase was searched with the terms and Synonyms: words similar to eEC and CAH with therapies associated with fertility-sparing.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The number of all patients accepted fertility sparing therapies, patients got regressed, relapsed and delivered were extracted from each study, and the regression, recurrence, and live birth rate of each study were calculated. The regression, recurrence and live birth rates between each two interventions were compared with the aid of meta-regression in packages of "meta" and "meta for" written in R.

RESULTS

Fifty-four studies reported fertility sparing therapies in young women with eEC and CAH were included. Meta-analysis showed that HR followed by progestogens achieved a higher pooled regression (98.06% vs 77.20% P < 0.0001) and live birth rate (52.57% vs 33.38%, P = 0.0944) and a lower recurrence rate compared with oral progestogens alone (4.79% vs 32.17% P = 0.0004). At the same time, the pooled live birth rate (52.57% vs 18.09% P =0.0399) of HR followed by progestogens are significantly higher than the LNG-IUS alone. Which no statistical difference in regression (98.06% vs 94.24%; P = 0.4098) and recurrence rates (4.79% vs 3.90% P = 0.8561) was seen.

CONCLUSIONS

Of the available fertility-sparing therapeutic options, HR followed by progestogens may be a more effective one.