Oxaliplatin salvage for recurrent ovarian cancer: A single institution's experience in patient populations with platinum resistant disease or a history of platinum hypersensitivity

Ovarian Cancer—Insights into Platinum Resistance and Overcoming It

Ovarian cancer is the most lethal gynecologic malignancy. Platinum-based chemotherapy is the backbone of treatment for ovarian cancer, and although the majority of patients initially have a platinum-sensitive disease, through multiple recurrences, they will acquire resistance. Platinum-resistant recurrent ovarian cancer has a poor prognosis and few treatment options with limited efficacy. Resistance to platinum compounds is a complex process involving multiple mechanisms pertaining not only to the tumoral cell but also to the tumoral microenvironment. In this review, we discuss the molecular mechanism involved in ovarian cancer cells’ resistance to platinum-based chemotherapy, focusing on the alteration of drug influx and efflux pathways, DNA repair, the dysregulation of epigenetic modulation, and the involvement of the tumoral microenvironment in the acquisition of the platinum-resistant phenotype. Furthermore, we review promising alternative treatment approaches that may improve these patients’ poor prognosis, discussing current strategies, novel combinations, and therapeutic agents.

Platinum Resistance After PARPi Resistance in a gBRCAmt Recurrent Ovarian Cancer Patient: a Case Report

As the most lethal gynecological malignant tumor, ovarian cancer is prone to recurrence and drug resistance. Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors are known to be effective in ovarian cancer patients as maintenance treatment, especially in patients with BRCA mutation. The current controversy is whether the use of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors may affect subsequent platinum sensitivity. A Chinese female patient diagnosed with high-grade serous ovarian cancer experienced five platinum-sensitive relapses. After obtaining informed consent from the patient, we performed next-generation gene sequencing and detected a germline BRCA1 pathologic mutation. When the patient achieved partial response with platinum after the fifth platinum-sensitive relapse, exploratory posterior-line maintenance therapy was performed due to her genotype. But the patient rapidly progressed to platinum resistance after poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor resistance. In a gBRCAmt patient with platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer, olaparib as exploratory posterior-line maintenance treatment is barely effective and may affect the response to subsequent platinum therapy.

Safety Profile of Oxaliplatin in 3,687 Patients With Cancer in China: A Post-Marketing Surveillance Study

Background

Oxaliplatin (OXA), a third-generation platinum derivative, has become one of the main chemotherapeutic drugs for colorectal cancer and other cancers, but reports of adverse reactions are also increasing with the extensive application of OXA. In this study, post-marketing surveillance was carried out to investigate the safety profile of OXA in a real-world setting in Chinese cancer patients to provide a reference for the rational application of OXA.

Methods

All patients with cancer who received OXA-based chemotherapy in 10 tertiary hospitals in Hubei Province, China, between May 2016 and November 2016 were enrolled. A central registration method was used to document patients' demographics, clinical use, and any incidence of adverse reactions to OXA. All adverse drug reactions (ADRs) were collected and analyzed to assess causality, severity, treatment, and outcome.

Results

In total, 3687 patients were enrolled in this study. Approximately 64.6% of the patients were male, and 68.8% were aged 50-70 years, with a mean age of 55.3 years. The proportions of patients diagnosed with colorectal and gastric cancers were 59.3% and 31.6%, respectively. In this study, the overall incidence of ADRs and serious ADRs was 42.7% and 1.3%, respectively. The most common ADRs were gastrointestinal disorders (25.7%), blood disorders (21.1%), and peripheral nervous system disorders (8.0%). The serious ADRs identified were hypersensitivity reactions, thrombocytopenia, abnormal hepatic function, and leukopenia/neutropenia. The median onset of gastrointestinal toxicity, myelosuppression, peripheral neurotoxicity, and abnormal hepatic function was 1 d, 5 d, 1 d, and 14 d, respectively. The majority (84.7%) of hypersensitivity reactions were mild to moderate, and the median time to onset of these reactions was within the first 20 min of OXA infusion. Almost 88.0% of patients who experienced ADRs recovered or improved with treatment.

Conclusion

Our data suggest that OXA-induced ADRs are very common in Chinese patients with cancer; however, more attention should be paid to hypersensitivity reactions caused by OXA. This study provides a valuable reference regarding the safe application of OXA in a real-world setting.

Pain in Platin-Induced Neuropathies: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Introduction

Platin-induced peripheral neuropathy (PIPN) is a common cause of PN in cancer patients. The aim of this paper is to systematically review the current literature regarding PIPN, with a particular focus on epidemiological and clinical characteristics of painful PIPN, and to discuss relevant management strategies.

Methods

A systematic computer-based literature search was conducted on the PubMed database.

Results

This search strategy resulted in the identification of 353 articles. After the eligibility assessment, 282 articles were excluded. An additional 24 papers were identified by scanning the reference lists. In total, 95 papers met the inclusion criteria and were used for this review. The prevalence of neuropathic symptoms due to acute toxicity of oxaliplatin was estimated at 84.6%, whereas PN established after chemotherapy with platins was estimated at 74.9%. Specifically regarding pain, the reported prevalence of pain due to acute toxicity of oxaliplatin was estimated at 55.6%, whereas the reported prevalence of chronic peripheral neuropathic pain in PIPN was estimated at 49.2%.

Conclusion

Peripheral neuropathy is a common complication in patients receiving platins and can be particularly painful. There is significant heterogeneity among studies regarding the method for diagnosing peripheral neuropathy. Nerve conduction studies are the gold standard and should be performed in patients receiving platins and complaining of neuropathic symptoms post-treatment.

Prevention of carboplatin-induced hypersensitivity reactions in women with ovarian cancer

Background

Carboplatin-based chemotherapy offers high response rates and improved overall survival for women with epithelial ovarian cancer, but its use is limited by the occurrence of hypersensitivity reactions. To evaluate the efficacy of prophylactic diphenhydramine for hypersensitivity reaction prevention, we reviewed the incidence of hypersensitivity reactions and identified patients at high risk of hypersensitivity reactions.

Methods

Women receiving ≥6 cycles of carboplatin-based chemotherapy for epithelial ovarian cancer were identified from our institutional database at the Princess Margaret Cancer Centre. Institutional policy was changed in 2009 to introduce diphenhydramine prophylaxis for patients receiving ≥6 cycles of carboplatin. Additional clinical data were abstracted from the patient record.

Results

Between 2006 and 2012, 450 women received ≥6 cycles of carboplatin-based chemotherapy for epithelial ovarian cancer. Two hundred and ninety-one women received prophylaxis with diphenhydramine. Carboplatin-induced hypersensitivity reactions occurred in 41 of 449 patients (9%). Univariable predictors of carboplatin-induced hypersensitivity reactions included administration of 8 to 10 cycles of carboplatin, history of other drug allergies and a platinum-free interval >12 months. BRCA mutational status was not predictive. In a multivariable analysis, the number of cycles of carboplatin and a platinum-free interval >12 months were independent predictors of hypersensitivity reactions. There was a trend towards diphenhydramine prophylaxis reducing the incidence of hypersensitivity reactions in women with a platinum-free interval compared to continuous delivery; this was most marked when the platinum-free interval was >12 months (n = 64) (OR: 0.2 (95% CI: 0.046–0.83), p = 0.03).

Conclusions

The administration of diphenhydramine to women who have a platinum-free interval may reduce the risk of hypersensitivity reaction, but prospective evaluation is required.

Phase I study of intravenous (IV) docetaxel and intraperitoneal (IP) oxaliplatin in recurrent ovarian and fallopian tube cancer

OBJECTIVE

The primary objective was to define the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) of IV docetaxel and IP oxaliplatin in women with recurrent ovarian (OV), fallopian tube (FT) or peritoneal (PP) cancer. Secondary objectives included response rate, time to progression, pharmacokinetics (PK) and quality of life (QoL).

METHODS

Patients received docetaxel 75mg/m(2) IV day (d) 1 and oxaliplatin escalating from 50mg/m(2) IP d2 every 3weeks using a 3+3 design. Treatment continued until disease progression, remission, or intolerable toxicity. Plasma and IP samples were taken to determine drug concentrations. MD Anderson Symptom Inventory and symptom interference scale were completed weekly.

RESULTS

Thirteen patients were included. Median number of cycles was 6 (range 1-10). Ten patients had measureable disease. Best response was partial response (PR-2), stable disease (SD-7), and progressive disease (PD-1). Twenty-one Grades 3-4 toxicities were noted, commonly hematologic. Two patients had DLTs: prolonged neutropenia (1) and abdominal pain (1). MTD was d1 docetaxel 75mg/m(2) IV and d2 oxaliplatin 50mg/m(2) IP. Symptom burden peaked week one and returned to baseline by week two of each cycle on dose level 1. Dose level 2 had persistently high symptom burden and interference. At IP oxaliplatin doses of 50mg/m(2), total unbound drug exposure (AUC) averaged 8 times larger and Cmax reached concentrations 50-fold greater in IP fluid compared to plasma.

CONCLUSIONS

Docetaxel 75mg/m(2) IV d1 and oxaliplatin 50mg/m(2) IP d2 is the MTD. Most patients had PR or SD. Patient-reported outcomes demonstrate temporary but tolerable decrements in QoL. IP oxaliplatin provides PK advantages over IV administration.

Rapamycin enhanced the antitumor efficacy of oxaliplatin in cisplatin-resistant ovarian cancer cells A2780cis both in vitro and in vivo

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of combination of rapamycin, an mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor for treating rejection after organ transplantation, and oxaliplatin, a third-generation of platinum drug usually used to treat chemoresistant or progressive ovarian cancer, in cisplatin-resistant ovarian carcinoma cells A2780cis.

METHODS/MATERIALS

Expressions of mTOR and its target molecules p70S6K and 4E-BP1 were determined in cisplatin-sensitive and -resistant cells A2780 and A2780cis, respectively, using Western blotting. Proliferation of A2780cis exposure to oxaliplatin or oxaliplatin plus rapamycin was examined using MTT assay in vitro as well as a nude mice model in vivo. Cell apoptosis and proapoptosis proteins including caspase-8 and -3 and PARP were determined using flow cytometry and Western blotting.

RESULTS

We found that A2780cis cells had partial cross-resistance between cisplatin and oxaliplatin. The levels of phosphorylated mTOR (p-mTOR), p70S6K, and 4E-BP1 were significantly increased in A2780cis cells compared to A2780 cells, which might be implicated in cisplatin-induced chemoresistance. Rapamycin obviously enhanced the inhibitory effect of oxaliplatin on the growth of A2780cis both in vitro and in vivo. Rapamycin slightly induced cell apoptosis but significantly enhanced the effect of oxaliplatin in soliciting apoptosis of A2780cis cells, which might be ascribed to its ability in further increasing the levels of cleaved caspase-8 and -3 and PARP induced by oxaliplatin.

CONCLUSION

These results suggested that combination of oxaliplatin and rapamycin enhanced the antitumour efficacy of oxaliplatin in A2780cis cells and therefore might have a role in treating cisplatin-resistant ovarian carcinoma.