A phase II study of gemcitabine, carboplatin and bevacizumab for the treatment of platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer

Association of bevacizumab and stroke in ovarian cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

The prognosis for patients with ovarian cancer is bleak. Clinical trials have shown the efficacy of bevacizumab in ovarian cancer treatment. However, life-threatening strokes may limit the usage of bevacizumab and require specific follow-up strategies. This study aims to systematically evaluate the risk of stroke of bevacizumab treatment in ovarian cancer.

Methods

We retrieved all relevant articles published up to December 4th, 2022, from Embase, PubMed, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library. The risk of stroke in patients with ovarian cancer treated with bevacizumab combined with chemotherapy was analyzed. Meta-analysis was performed using the Stata 17 software and R 4.2.1 program.

Results

Six randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of bevacizumab combined with chemotherapy or chemotherapy for ovarian cancer and six single-experimental-arm trials were included in this study. The meta-analysis showed a pooled risk ratio (RR) of 2.14 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.88-7.99] for patients with ovarian cancer treated with bevacizumab combined with chemotherapy. Subgroup analyses showed that the incidence of stroke-related adverse events in the carboplatin + paclitaxel + bevacizumab group was 0.01% (95% CI: 0.00-0.01, p < 0.01). The incidence of stroke-related adverse events was 0.01% (95% CI: 0.00-0.01, p < 0.01) in patients aged ≥60. The incidence of stroke caused by cerebral ischemia and cerebral hemorrhage was 0.01% (95% CI: 0.01-0.02, p = 0.27) and 0.01% (95% CI: 0.00-0.01, p < 0.01), respectively.

Conclusions

This meta-analysis indicates that chemotherapy combined with bevacizumab may not increase the incidence of stroke in patients with ovarian cancer. However, stroke-related adverse events may be higher in older patients. Cerebral hemorrhage might cause the incidence of stroke more than cerebral ischemia.

Systematic review registration

PROSPERO (CRD42022381003).

The Efficacy and Safety of Pazopanib Plus Chemotherapy in Treating Recurrent or Persistent Ovarian Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Patients with recurrent or persistent ovarian cancer often have poor prognoses, and their optimal treatment regimen remains unclear. Inhibition of angiogenesis is a valuable strategy for treating ovarian cancer, and the drug pazopanib is a potent, multitarget tyrosine kinase inhibitor. However, treatment with pazopanib in combination with chemotherapy remains controversial. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to clarify the efficacy and side effects of pazopanib combined with chemotherapy in the treatment of advanced ovarian cancer.

METHODS

The PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases were systematically searched for relevant randomized controlled trials published up to September 2, 2022. The primary outcomes of eligible studies included overall response rate (ORR), disease control rate, 1-year progression-free survival (PFS) rate, 2-year PFS rate, 1-year overall survival (OS) rate, 2-year OS rate, and adverse events.

RESULT

Outcomes from a total of 518 recurrent or persistent ovarian cancer patients from 5 studies were analyzed in this systematic review. Pooled results showed that pazopanib plus chemotherapy, when compared with chemotherapy alone, significantly improved the ORR (pooled risk ratio=1.400; 95% CI, 1.062-1.846; P = 0.017) but not the disease control rate, 1-year PFS, 2-year PFS, 1-year OS, or 2-year OS. Moreover, pazopanib increased the risk of neutropenia, hypertension, fatigue, and liver dysfunction.

CONCLUSION

Pazopanib plus chemotherapy improved patient ORR but did not improve survival; it also increased the occurrence of several adverse events. Further large-sample clinical trials are needed to verify these results to guide pazopanib use in patients with ovarian cancer.

Neo-vascularization-based therapeutic perspectives in advanced ovarian cancer

The process of angiogenesis is well described for its potential role in the development of normal ovaries, and physiological functions as well as in the initiation, progression, and metastasis of ovarian cancer (OC). In advanced stages of OC, cancer cells spread outside the ovary to the pelvic, abdomen, lung, or multiple secondary sites. This seriously limits the efficacy of therapeutic options contributing to fatal clinical outcomes. Notably, a variety of angiogenic effectors are produced by the tumor cells to initiate angiogenic processes leading to the development of new blood vessels, which provide essential resources for tumor survival, dissemination, and dormant micro-metastasis of tumor cells. Multiple proangiogenic effectors and their signaling axis have been discovered and functionally characterized for potential clinical utility in OC. In this review, we have provided the current updates on classical and emerging proangiogenic effectors, their signaling axis, and the immune microenvironment contributing to the pathogenesis of OC. Moreover, we have comprehensively reviewed and discussed the significance of the preclinical strategies, drug repurposing, and clinical trials targeting the angiogenic processes that hold promising perspectives for the better management of patients with OC.

The use of bevacizumab in the modern era of targeted therapy for ovarian cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

The optimal systemic therapy strategy for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) remains unclear. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess oncologic outcomes and toxicity of bevacizumab combination treatment in advanced EOC.

METHODS

We conducted an electronic search of all phase 2 and 3 clinical trials involving bevacizumab combination therapy in advanced-stage EOC between 2010 and March 2020, using Embase, Medline, Epub Ahead of Print, Cochrane for clinical trials, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Web of Science and clinicaltrials.gov databases. Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and their hazard ratios (HR) when available were extracted. Pooled HR were calculated for each efficacy endpoint in the meta-analysis using inverse variance weighted method. Bias was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias I (ROB1) tool for randomized controlled trials.

RESULTS

Thirty-five studies were included in the qualitative analysis and eight studies in the quantitative synthesis. In the first-line setting, bevacizumab combined with chemotherapy revealed a significant improvement in PFS (pooled HR = 0.72, 95% CI 0.65-0.81) when compared to chemotherapy alone but no significant OS benefit (pooled HR = 0.88, 95% CI 0.72-1.06). In the recurrent setting, bevacizumab combinations showed significant PFS (pooled HR = 0.52, 95% CI 0.47-0.58) and OS benefits (pooled HR = 0.88, 95% CI 0.79-0.99) compared with non-bevacizumab regimens. Rate of bowel perforation was low at 1.24% (range 0-4.2%).

CONCLUSIONS

Bevacizumab-containing regimens are associated with significant PFS benefit in advanced and recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer. While the difference in OS did not reach statistical significance in the first-line setting, bevacizumab was associated with improved survival in the recurrent setting.

Targeted therapies in gynecological cancers: a comprehensive review of clinical evidence

Advanced and recurrent gynecological cancers are associated with poor prognosis and lack of effective treatment. The developments of the molecular mechanisms on cancer progression provide insight into novel targeted therapies, which are emerging as groundbreaking and promising cancer treatment strategies. In gynecologic malignancies, potential therapeutic targeted agents include antiangiogenic agents, poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors, tumor-intrinsic signaling pathway inhibitors, selective estrogen receptor downregulators, and immune checkpoint inhibitors. In this article, we provide a comprehensive review of the clinical evidence of targeted agents in gynecological cancers and discuss the future implication.

Genome-scale CRISPR/Cas9 screen determines factors modulating sensitivity to ProTide NUC-1031

Gemcitabine is a fluoropyrimidine analogue that is used as a mainstay of chemotherapy treatment for pancreatic and ovarian cancers, amongst others. Despite its widespread use, gemcitabine achieves responses in less than 10% of patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer and has a very limited impact on overall survival due to intrinsic and acquired resistance. NUC-1031 (Acelarin), a phosphoramidate transformation of gemcitabine, was the first anti-cancer ProTide to enter the clinic. We find it displays important in vitro cytotoxicity differences to gemcitabine, and a genome-wide CRISPR/Cas9 genetic screening approach identified only the pyrimidine metabolism pathway as modifying cancer cell sensitivity to NUC-1031. Low deoxycytidine kinase expression in tumour biopsies from patients treated with gemcitabine, assessed by immunostaining and image analysis, correlates with a poor prognosis, but there is no such correlation in tumour biopsies from a Phase I cohort treated with NUC-1031.

Pharmacological factors affecting accumulation of gemcitabine's active metabolite, gemcitabine triphosphate

Gemcitabine is an anticancer agent acting against several solid tumors. It requires nucleoside transporters for cellular uptake and deoxycytidine kinase for activation into active gemcitabine-triphosphate, which is incorporated into the DNA and RNA. However, it can also be deaminated in the plasma. The intracellular level of gemcitabine-triphosphate is affected by scheduling or by combination with other chemotherapeutic regimens. Moreover, higher concentrations of gemcitabine-triphosphate may affect the toxicity, and possibly the clinical efficacy. As a consequence, different nucleoside analogs have been synthetized with the aim to increase the concentration of gemcitabine-triphosphate into cells. In this review, we summarize currently published evidence on pharmacological factors affecting the intracellular level of gemcitabine-triphosphate to guide future trials on the use of new nucleoside analogs.

Bevacizumab in Ovarian Cancer: State of the Art and Unanswered Questions

Ovarian cancer is a most lethal gynecologic tumor. The mainstay treatment is cytoreductive surgery followed by platinum-based chemotherapy. However, a high percentage of patients recur, thus needing multiple treatments with a frequently poor prognosis. In the last two decades, research has focused on the potential of target therapies to improve the survival of patients affected by ovarian cancer. Bevacizumab is one of the most studied target therapies, and it is approved for first- and second-line treatment of advanced epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, and primary peritoneal tumors. Despite its widespread use with favorable results, controversy regarding patient selection and the best schedule, dosage, and timing of bevacizumab still exists. This review summarizes the state of the art on the use of bevacizumab for ovarian cancer in front-line, recurrence, and neoadjuvant settings. This study focuses on the results of pivotal trials, emerging data, ongoing research, and still unanswered questions about the most adequate dosage of bevacizumab and its potential activity after disease progression or rechallenge in previously treated patients.

Targeted therapy in ovarian cancer

Among female-specific cancers worldwide, ovarian cancer is the leading cause of death from gynecologic malignancy in the western world. Despite radical surgery and initial high response rates to first-line chemotherapy, up to 70% of patients experience relapses with a median progression-free survival of 12-18 months. There remains an urgent need for novel targeted therapies to improve clinical outcomes in ovarian cancer. This review aims to assess current understanding of targeted therapy in ovarian cancer and evaluate the evidence for targeting growth-dependent mechanisms involved in its pathogenesis. Of the many targeted therapies currently under evaluation, the most promising strategies developed thus far are antiangiogenic agents and PARP inhibitors.

Bevacizumab toxicity in heavily pretreated recurrent epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, and primary peritoneal cancers

OBJECTIVE

Bevacizumab was recently approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for use in recurrent platinum resistant epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC), fallopian tube cancer (FTC), or primary peritoneal cancer (PPC) when no more than two prior cytotoxic regimens have been used; due to concerns for gastrointestinal perforation. We sought to determine bevacizumab-related toxicities in heavily pretreated recurrent EOC.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective chart review of patients with recurrent EOC, FTC, and PPC from 2001 to 2011. Patients who received at least two prior chemotherapy regimens before bevacizumab were included. Medical records were reviewed for bevacizumab associated toxicities. The Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test was used to compare quantitative variables. Survival was estimated with the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

Sixty patients met inclusion criteria. At the start of bevacizumab treatment, the median age was 60 years and the median body mass index was 26.5 kg/m². More than 50% of patients received bevacizumab after three prior cytotoxic regimens. Grade 3 or higher bevacizumab associated toxicity events occurred in four patients, including one patient who developed a rectovaginal fistula. The median overall survival from the start of bevacizumab treatment was 21.05 months (95% CI, 18.23 to 32.67; range, 1.9 to 110 months). The number of cytotoxic regimens prior to bevacizumab treatment did not differ in those that experienced a toxicity versus those that did not (p=0.66).

CONCLUSION

The use of bevacizumab in heavily pretreated EOC, FTC, or PPC is worth consideration.

Emerging therapies: angiogenesis inhibitors for ovarian cancer

INTRODUCTION

Patients with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) have a high rate of recurrence, and overall survival remains at ∼ 25%. There is a need for new treatments that can increase progression free survival and quality of life. Recent clinical trials focus on angiogenesis, VEGFs, and tyrosine kinase inhibitors that play a role in recurrence, metastasis, and ascites in EOC.

AREAS COVERED

This review summarizes clinical rationale, mechanisms of action, and clinical data for angiogenesis inhibitors under evaluation in Phase II and III trials for EOC. Anti-angiogenesis agents reviewed in this paper include aflibercept, bevacizumab, cediranib, fosbretabulin, imatinib, nintedanib, pazopanib, saracatinib, sorafenib, sunitinib, and trebananib.

EXPERT OPINION

These agents have particular rationale for potential use in EOC due to the molecular changes associated with EOC tumorigenesis, namely a significant increase in angiogenic activity. Due to the costs and toxicities associated with anti-angiogenics, biomarker or molecular signature selection strategy for patients who will most benefit would be ideal but no such strategy has been validated to date.

Salvage Chemotherapy for Patients With Recurrent or Persistent Ovarian Clear Cell Carcinoma: A Retrospective Study of 164 Cases

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of salvage chemotherapy on recurrent or persistent ovarian clear cell carcinoma (CCC) with the goal of identifying a more rational treatment regimen for this lethal disease.The medical records of patients with CCC were retrospectively reviewed to select patients that were subsequently treated for recurrent or persistent disease.Of the 164 women with recurrent or persistent CCC, 485 chemotherapy courses with 1766 cycles were administered. Overall, the clinical benefit rate (CBR) was 39.4%, and the mean progression-free survival (PFS) was 4.5 months. Grade 3/4 toxicities occurred in 94 courses (19.4%). The CBR for TC was 45.1%, with a PFS of 3.7 months. Compared to that of TC, the CBRs for PC and CC were significantly lower (P = 0.020 and 0.021, respectively). The CBRs and PFS for PAF-C were slightly higher (P = 0.518 and 0.077, respectively), but showed a significantly higher adverse event rate (AER, P = 0.039). The CBR for bevacizumab was 50% with an extraordinarily long PFS (49.8 months). Gemcitabine and oxaliplatin had similar values for CBRs (44.4% and 44.1%) and PFS (2.5 and 3.4 months), respectively. Docetaxel (weekly) exhibited a notably low AER of 2.7%, and topotecan was associated with a relatively long PFS (7.7 months).For cis/carboplatin-pretreated patients, the existing active agents, such as oxaliplatin, gemcitabine, topotecan, and especially bevacizumab, are promising. Docetaxel (weekly) is well tolerated and might offer a particularly viable option for heavily pretreated patients. However, additional research to identify for a continued search for the optimal combination of chemotherapeutics or novel agents is still warranted.