Low-dose fractionated radiation and chemotherapy prior to definitive chemoradiation in locally advanced carcinoma of the uterine cervix: Results of a prospective phase II clinical trial

Clinical Studies on Ultrafractionated Chemoradiation: A Systematic Review

Aim

The efficacy of low-dose fractionated radiotherapy (LDFRT) and chemotherapy (CHT) combination has large preclinical but little clinical evidence. Therefore, the aim of this review was to collect and analyze the clinical results of LDRT plus concurrent CHT in patients with advanced cancers.

Methods

A systematic literature search was conducted on PubMed using the PRISMA methodology. Only studies based on the combination of LDFRT (< 1 Gy/fraction) and CHT were included. Endpoints of the analysis were tumor response, toxicity, and overall survival, with particular focus on any differences between LDFRT-CHT and CHT alone.

Results

Twelve studies (307 patients) fulfilled the selection criteria and were included in this review. Two studies were retrospective, one was a prospective pilot trial, six were phase II studies, two were phase I trials, and one was a phase I/II open label study. No randomized controlled trials were found. Seven out of eight studies comparing clinical response showed higher rates after LDFRT-CHT compared to CHT alone. Three out of four studies comparing survival reported improved results after combined treatment. Three studies compared toxicity of CHT and LDFRT plus CHT, and all of them reported similar adverse events rates. In most cases, toxicity was manageable with only three likely LDFRT-unrelated fatal events (1%), all recorded in the same series on LDFRT plus temozolomide in glioblastoma multiforme patients.

Conclusion

None of the analyzed studies provided level I evidence on the clinical impact of LDFRT plus CHT. However, it should be noted that, apart from two small series of breast cancers, all studies reported improved therapeutic outcomes and similar tolerability compared to CHT alone.

Systematic Review Registration

www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42020206639.

Updates on systemic therapy for cervical cancer

Cervical cancer is one of the most common cancers in the world both in terms of incidence and mortality, more so important in low- and middle-income countries. Surgery and radiotherapy remain the backbone of treatment for non-metastatic cervical cancer, with significant improvement in survival provided by addition of chemotherapy to radiotherapy. Survival as well as quality of life is improved by chemotherapy in metastatic disease. Platinum-based chemotherapy with/without bevacizumab is the mainstay of treatment for metastatic disease and has shown improvement in survival. The right combinations and sequence of treatment modalities and medicines are still evolving. Data regarding the molecular and genomic biology of cervical cancer have revealed multiple potential targets for treatment, and several new agents are presently under evaluation including targeted therapies, immunotherapies and vaccines. This review discusses briefly the current standards, newer updates as well as future prospective approaches in systemic therapies for cervical cancer.

Chemopotentiating effects of low-dose fractionated radiation on cisplatin and paclitaxel in cervix cancer cell lines and normal fibroblasts from patients with cervix cancer

The aim of the present study was to compare the effects (assessed by clonogenic survival and γH2AX foci assays) of low-dose fractionated radiation LDFR (4 × 0.125 Gy, 4 × 0.25 Gy and 4 × 0.5 Gy) versus single radiation doses (0.5 Gy, 1 Gy and 2 Gy) on cisplatin and paclitaxel in HRS-negative cervix cancer cell lines SiHa and CaSki to see if the effects of LDFR can emerge in cells that not present low-dose hyper-radiosensitivity (HRS) phenomenon. Additionally, we report the effects in normal fibroblasts (HRS-negative and HRS-positive) from two patients with cervix cancer to see if the chemopotentiating effects of LDFR also apply to normal cells. LDFR (4 × 0.125 Gy, 4 × 0.25 Gy and 4 × 0.5 Gy) as well as single doses (0.5 Gy, 1 Gy and 2 Gy) enhanced cytotoxicity of cisplatin and paclitaxel in all the cell lines. Cisplatin-potentiating effects were maximum with LDFR 4 × 0.5 Gy, and were two-fold greater than those with a single dose of 2 Gy in SiHa, CaSki and HFIB2 cells. Paclitaxel-enhancing effects were also maximum with LDFR 4 × 0.5 Gy, however only in HRS-positive HFIB2 fibroblasts were significantly greater than those with a single dose of 2 Gy. The results demonstrate that LDFR may enhance the effects of cisplatin and paclitaxel in SiHa and CaSki cells, although they lack HRS phenomenon, and show that the magnitude of the potentiating effects of LDFR depends on cytostatic type and the size of low doses. In normal fibroblasts the chemopotentiating effects of LDFR seem to depend on HRS status. In conclusion, the unique enhancing effects of LDFR on cisplatin in cervical cancer cell lines, even when HRS negative, suggest that all patients with cervical cancer may benefit from the addition of LDFR to adjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy.

Low-dose fractionated radiation with induction docetaxel and cisplatin followed by concurrent cisplatin and radiation therapy in locally advanced nasopharyngeal cancer: A randomized phase II-III trial

OBJECTIVE/BACKGROUND

To evaluate the efficacy and outcome of adding low-dose fractionated radiotherapy (LDFRT) to induction chemotherapy plus concurrent chemoradiation in locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (LANPC).

METHODS

A single-institute, phase II-III, prospectively controlled randomized clinical trial was performed at King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre. Patients aged 18-70 years with WHO type II and III, stage III-IVB nasopharyngeal carcinoma, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance score of 0-2, with adequate hematological, renal, and hepatic function were eligible. In total, 108 patients were enrolled in this trial. All patients received two cycles of induction docetaxel and cisplatin (75 mg/m² each) chemotherapy on Days 1 and 22, followed by concurrent chemoradiation therapy. Radiation therapy consisted of 70 Gy in 33 fractions, with concurrent cisplatin 25 mg/m² for 4 days on Days 43 and 64. Patients were randomly assigned to either adding LDFRT (0.5 Gy twice daily 6 hours apart for 2 days) to induction chemotherapy in the experimental arm (54 patients) or induction chemotherapy alone in the control arm (54 patients).

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in the post-induction response rates (RRs) or in toxicity between the two treatment arms. The 3-year overall survival (OS), locoregional control (LRC), and distant metastases-free survival (DMFS) rates for experimental arm and control arm were 94% versus 93% (p = .8), 84.8% versus 87.5% (p = .58), and 84.1% versus 91.6% (p = .25), respectively.

CONCLUSION

The results showed no benefit from adding LDFRT to induction chemotherapy in terms of RR, OS, LRC, and DMFS.

Low-dose radiotherapy and concurrent FOLFIRI-bevacizumab: a Phase II study

Aims: Low-dose radiation therapy (LDRT) can increase biological efficacy of chemotherapy. This Phase II trial evaluates LDRT plus FOLFIRI-bevacizumab (FOLFIRI-B) in metastatic colorectal cancer. Materials & methods: Primary objective: raising the clinical complete response rate from 5 to 25%. Secondary objectives: toxicity, progression-free survival. Patients underwent 12 FOLFIRI-B cycles plus two daily LDRT fractions (20 cGy/6 h interval) on each cycle. Statistical analysis was planned on 18 patients. Results: Results on 18 patients are reported. Specifically considering irradiated sites: 15/18 patients had a partial (11/18) or complete (4/18) response. Among 11 partial responders, three became a pathological CR after surgery. Grade 3–4 toxicity was recorded in two patients (11.1%). At median follow-up of 30 months (range: 8-50), 7/18 patients progressed in irradiated sites. Conclusion: Seven out of 18 patients (38.9%) had clinical or pathological CR in lesions treated with LDRT. Further studies on this newer treatment modality seem justified.