1
|
Management and Prognosis of Patients with Recurrent or Persistent/Progressive Uterine Carcinosarcoma. Curr Oncol 2022; 29:7607-7623. [PMID: 36290878 PMCID: PMC9600185 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol29100601] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2022] [Revised: 09/17/2022] [Accepted: 10/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Uterine carcinosarcoma (UCS) is a highly aggressive gynecologic malignancy. Recurrent or persistent/progressive disease is usually fatal. We aimed to investigate the management and prognosis of these patients. Clinical records of UCS patients from June 1987 to April 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. The stage was re-assigned with the FIGO 2009 staging system. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to identify the independent predictors of survival after recurrence (SAR) and cancer-specific survival (CSS). Of the 168 patients, 98 experienced treatment failure. The median time to treatment failure (TTF) was 8.1 months (range: 0.0-89.1). The median follow-up time of censored patients was 32.0 months (range: 16.8-170.7). The 5-year SAR rates of those with recurrent or persistent/progressive disease were 7.6%. On multivariate analysis, salvage therapy mainly using radiotherapy (HR 0.27, 95% CI: 0.10-0.71) or chemotherapy (HR 0.41, 95% CI: 0.24-0.72) or chemoradiotherapy (CRT) (HR 0.33, 95% CI: 0.15-0.75) were associated with improved SAR, whereas disseminated recurrence was associated with significantly worse SAR (HR 3.94, 95% CI: 1.67-9.31, p = 0.002). Salvage therapy using radiotherapy or chemotherapy or CRT significantly improved SAR. Surgery significantly improved CSS but not SAR, adjusting for confounding factors.
Collapse
|
2
|
Matsuzaki S, Klar M, Matsuzaki S, Roman LD, Sood AK, Matsuo K. Uterine carcinosarcoma: Contemporary clinical summary, molecular updates, and future research opportunity. Gynecol Oncol 2020; 160:586-601. [PMID: 33183764 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.10.043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 52] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2020] [Accepted: 10/31/2020] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Uterine carcinosarcoma (UCS) is a biphasic aggressive high-grade endometrial cancer in which the sarcoma element has de-differentiated from the carcinoma element. UCS is considered a rare tumor, but its incidence has gradually increased in recent years (annual percent change from 2000 to 2016 1.7%, 95% confidence interval 1.2-2.2) as has the proportion of UCS among endometrial cancer, exceeding 5% in recent years. UCS typically affects the elderly, but in recent decades patients became younger. Notably, a stage-shift has occurred in recent years with increasing nodal metastasis and decreasing distant metastasis. The concept of sarcoma dominance may be new in UCS, and a sarcomatous element >50% of the uterine tumor is associated with decreased survival. Multimodal treatment is the mainstay of UCS. Lymphadenectomy, chemotherapy, and brachytherapy have increased in the past few decades, but survival outcomes remain dismal: the median survival is less than two years, and the 5-year overall survival rate has not changed in decades (31.9% in 1975 to 33.8% in 2012). Carboplatin/paclitaxel adjuvant chemotherapy improves progression-free survival compared with ifosfamide/paclitaxel, particularly in stages III-IV disease (GOG-261 trial). Twenty-six clinical trials previously examined therapeutic effectiveness in recurrent/metastatic UCS. The median response rate and progression-free survival were 37.5% and 5.9 months, respectively, after first-line therapy, but after later therapies, the outcomes were far worse (5.5% and 1.8 months, respectively). One significant discovery was that epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) plays a pivotal role in the pathogenesis of sarcomatous dedifferentiation in UCS and that heterologous sarcoma is associated with a higher EMT signature compared with homologous sarcoma. Furthermore, next-generation sequencing has revealed that UCS tumors are serous-like and that common somatic mutations include those in TP53, PIK3CA, FBXW7, PTEN, and ARID1A. This contemporary review highlights recent clinical and molecular updates in UCS. A possible therapeutic target of EMT in UCS is also discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shinya Matsuzaki
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan
| | - Maximilian Klar
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Satoko Matsuzaki
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan
| | - Lynda D Roman
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Anil K Sood
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, University of Texas, MD-Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Koji Matsuo
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ebata T, Yonemori K, Nishikawa T, Sudo K, Shimomura A, Noguchi E, Fujiwara Y, Kato T, Hasegawa K, Fujiwara K, Tamura K. Treatment Outcome of Second-Line Chemotherapy for Gynecologic Carcinosarcoma. Oncology 2020; 98:699-705. [PMID: 32526764 DOI: 10.1159/000507333] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2020] [Accepted: 03/16/2020] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Carcinosarcoma is a rare cancer, and its prognosis is poor. There are few reports on the prognostic factors of patients with carcinosarcoma who receive second-line chemotherapy. OBJECTIVE To investigate the outcome and prognostic factors of patients who received second-line chemotherapy for gynecologic carcinosarcoma. METHODS We retrospectively investigated patients with ovarian or uterine carcinosarcoma, who were treated at two institutions from July 2006 to March 2018. All patients who had received second-line chemotherapy for advanced or recurrent disease were eligible. The efficacy of second-line chemotherapy and prognostic factors were evaluated. RESULTS Forty-six patients were eligible. Combination chemotherapy was used in approximately half (52.2%) of the patients. The response rate and disease control rate of second-line chemotherapy were 32.6 and 60.9%, respectively. The median follow-up period was 11.0 (range, 8.8-107.5) months. The median progression-free survival and overall survival were 6.3 (95% CI, 3.2-7.5) months and 12.9 (95% CI, 7.8-16.0) months, respectively. In the multivariate analysis of overall survival, a treatment-free interval >180 days was a significant good prognostic factor. The median overall survival was 7.8 (95% CI, 5.1-10.5) months in the <180 days group and 16.4 (95% CI, 13.1-130.6) months in the >180 days group (p = 0.0052; hazard ratio, 0.26; 95% CI, 0.10-0.66), respectively. CONCLUSION The outcome of gynecologic carcinosarcoma in the second-line setting is poor, especially in patients with a short treatment-free interval.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takahiro Ebata
- Department of Breast and Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kan Yonemori
- Department of Breast and Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan,
| | - Tadaaki Nishikawa
- Department of Breast and Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.,Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Hidaka City, Japan
| | - Kazuki Sudo
- Department of Breast and Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Akihiko Shimomura
- Department of Breast and Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Emi Noguchi
- Department of Breast and Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yasuhiro Fujiwara
- Department of Breast and Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Tomoyasu Kato
- Department of Gynecology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kosei Hasegawa
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Hidaka City, Japan
| | - Keiichi Fujiwara
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Hidaka City, Japan
| | - Kenji Tamura
- Department of Breast and Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kucukgoz Gulec U, Kilic Bagir E, Paydas S, Guzel AB, Gumurdulu D, Vardar MA. Prognostic significance of programmed death-1 (PD-1) and programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression in uterine carcinosarcoma. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2020; 244:51-55. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2019.11.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2019] [Revised: 11/04/2019] [Accepted: 11/07/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
|
5
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To provide a modern overview for radiologists of the unique radiological, pathological, and clinical features of uterine carcinosarcoma (UCS). RESULTS UCS is a unique gynecological malignancy that continues to present diagnostic and therapeutic challenges to the field of oncology. The classification and clinical understanding of this malignancy have evolved in recent years, yielding a modern conceptualization of a neoplastic entity that has been well studied but incompletely understood. As UCS causes a significant proportion of deaths secondary to uterine cancer, developing a familiarity with the imaging and clinical features of this entity is critical. In addition to summarizing the modern understanding of this tumor variant, an overview of the common imaging features of UCS will be presented. The role of radiological staging, imaging findings on presentation and follow-up imaging, and modern treatment paradigms will be discussed. Lastly, the current treatment paradigms and surveillance recommendations for UCS will be summarized. CONCLUSION Knowledge of the modern understanding of uterine carcinosarcoma, including its relevant imaging and clinical features, is critical for radiologists.
Collapse
|
6
|
Matsuo K, Takazawa Y, Ross MS, Elishaev E, Yunokawa M, Sheridan TB, Bush SH, Klobocista MM, Blake EA, Takano T, Baba T, Satoh S, Shida M, Ikeda Y, Adachi S, Yokoyama T, Takekuma M, Yanai S, Takeuchi S, Nishimura M, Iwasaki K, Johnson MS, Yoshida M, Hakam A, Machida H, Mhawech-Fauceglia P, Ueda Y, Yoshino K, Kajiwara H, Hasegawa K, Yasuda M, Miyake TM, Moriya T, Yuba Y, Morgan T, Fukagawa T, Pejovic T, Nagano T, Sasaki T, Richmond AM, Post MD, Shahzad MMK, Im DD, Yoshida H, Enomoto T, Omatsu K, Ueland FR, Kelley JL, Karabakhtsian RG, Roman LD. Proposal for a Risk-Based Categorization of Uterine Carcinosarcoma. Ann Surg Oncol 2018; 25:3676-3684. [PMID: 30105438 PMCID: PMC7521084 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-018-6695-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2018] [Indexed: 01/23/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To propose a categorization model of uterine carcinosarcoma (UCS) based on tumor cell types (carcinoma and sarcoma) and sarcoma dominance. METHODS This secondary analysis of a prior multicenter retrospective study examined 889 cases of UCS with available histologic evaluation. Based on survival outcome, cases were clustered into three groups: low-grade carcinoma with nondominant homologous sarcoma [type A, n = 96 (10.8%)], (1) low-grade carcinoma with heterologous sarcoma or any sarcoma dominance and (2) high-grade carcinoma with nondominant homologous sarcoma [type B, n = 412 (46.3%)], and high-grade carcinoma with heterologous sarcoma or any sarcoma dominance [type C, n = 381 (42.9%)]. Tumor characteristics and outcome were examined based on the categorization. RESULTS Women in type C category were more likely to be older, obese, and Caucasian, whereas those in type A category were younger, less obese, Asian, and nulligravid (all P < 0.01). Type C tumors were more likely to have metastatic implants, large tumor size, lymphovascular space invasion with sarcoma cells, and higher lymph node ratio, whereas type A tumors were more likely to be early-stage disease and small (all P < 0.05). On multivariate analysis, tumor categorization was independently associated with progression-free survival (5-year rates: 70.1% for type A, 48.3% for type B, and 35.9% for type C, adjusted P < 0.01) and cause-specific survival (5-year rates: 82.8% for type A, 63.0% for type B, and 47.1% for type C, adjusted P < 0.01). CONCLUSION Characteristic differences in clinicopathological factors and outcomes in UCS imply that different underlying etiologies and biological behaviors may be present, supporting a new classification system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Koji Matsuo
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
| | - Yutaka Takazawa
- Department of Pathology, Cancer Institute Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Malcolm S Ross
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Esther Elishaev
- Department of Pathology, MaGee-Womens Hospital, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Mayu Yunokawa
- Department of Breast and Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Todd B Sheridan
- Department of Pathology, Mercy Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Stephen H Bush
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Merieme M Klobocista
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Montefiore Medical Center, New York City, NY, USA
| | - Erin A Blake
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Colorado, Denver, CO, USA
| | - Tadao Takano
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tohoku University, Miyagi, Japan
| | - Tsukasa Baba
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Shinya Satoh
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tottori University, Tottori, Japan
| | - Masako Shida
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tokai University, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Yuji Ikeda
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Sosuke Adachi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Niigata University, Niigata, Japan
| | - Takuhei Yokoyama
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Osaka Rosai Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | | | - Shiori Yanai
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kurashiki Medical Center, Okayama, Japan
| | - Satoshi Takeuchi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Iwate Medical University, Morioka, Japan
| | - Masato Nishimura
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tokushima University, Tokushima, Japan
| | - Keita Iwasaki
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Aichi Medical University, Aichi, Japan
| | - Marian S Johnson
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Kentucky Medical Center, Lexington, KY, USA
| | - Masayuki Yoshida
- Department of Pathology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Ardeshir Hakam
- Department of Pathology, Moffitt Cancer Center, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Hiroko Machida
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | | | - Yutaka Ueda
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan
| | - Kiyoshi Yoshino
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan
| | | | - Kosei Hasegawa
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Saitama, Japan
| | - Masanori Yasuda
- Department of Pathology, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Saitama, Japan
| | - Takahito M Miyake
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kawasaki Medical School, Okayama, Japan
| | - Takuya Moriya
- Department of Pathology, Kawasaki Medical School, Okayama, Japan
| | - Yoshiaki Yuba
- Department of Pathology, Kitano Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | - Terry Morgan
- Department of Pathology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | | | - Tanja Pejovic
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Tadayoshi Nagano
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kitano Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | - Takeshi Sasaki
- Department of Pathology, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Abby M Richmond
- Department of Pathology, University of Colorado, Denver, CO, USA
| | - Miriam D Post
- Department of Pathology, University of Colorado, Denver, CO, USA
| | - Mian M K Shahzad
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Dwight D Im
- Department of Gynecology, Mercy Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Hiroshi Yoshida
- Department of Pathology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takayuki Enomoto
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Niigata University, Niigata, Japan
| | - Kohei Omatsu
- Department of Gynecology, Cancer Institute Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Frederick R Ueland
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Kentucky Medical Center, Lexington, KY, USA
| | - Joseph L Kelley
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Rouzan G Karabakhtsian
- Department of Pathology, University of Kentucky Medical Center, Lexington, KY, USA
- Department of Pathology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, New York City, NY, USA
| | - Lynda D Roman
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Matsuo K, Takazawa Y, Ross MS, Elishaev E, Yunokawa M, Sheridan TB, Bush SH, Klobocista MM, Blake EA, Takano T, Baba T, Satoh S, Shida M, Ikeda Y, Adachi S, Yokoyama T, Takekuma M, Yanai S, Takeuchi S, Nishimura M, Iwasaki K, Johnson MS, Yoshida M, Hakam A, Machida H, Mhawech-Fauceglia P, Ueda Y, Yoshino K, Kajiwara H, Hasegawa K, Yasuda M, Miyake TM, Moriya T, Yuba Y, Morgan T, Fukagawa T, Pejovic T, Nagano T, Sasaki T, Richmond AM, Post MD, Shahzad MMK, Im DD, Yoshida H, Omatsu K, Ueland FR, Kelley JL, Karabakhtsian RG, Roman LD. Characterizing sarcoma dominance pattern in uterine carcinosarcoma: Homologous versus heterologous element. Surg Oncol 2018; 27:433-440. [PMID: 30217299 PMCID: PMC7526039 DOI: 10.1016/j.suronc.2018.05.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2018] [Accepted: 05/10/2018] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To examine significance of sarcoma dominance (SD) patterns in uterine carcinosarcoma (UCS). METHODS This is a secondary analysis of multicenter retrospective study examining women with stages I-IV UCS who underwent primary surgery. SD was defined as >50% of sarcoma component in uterine tumor. SD patterns were grouped as homologous sarcoma without SD (homo/non-dominance, n = 351), heterologous sarcoma without SD (hetero/non-dominance, n = 174), homologous sarcoma with SD (homo/dominance, n = 175), and heterologous sarcoma with SD (hetero/dominance, n = 189), and correlated to tumor characteristics and survival. RESULTS SD patterns were significantly associated with age, body habitus, carcinoma type, tumor size, depth of myometrial invasion, and nodal metastasis (all, P < 0.05). On univariate analysis, SD was associated with decreased progression-free survival (PFS) and cause-specific survival (CSS) in homologous cases (both, P < 0.05) but not in heterologous cases. On multivariate models, both homologous and heterologous SD patterns remained independent prognostic factors for decreased PFS (adjusted-hazard ratio [HR] ranges: homo/dominance 1.35-1.69, and hetero/dominance 1.47-1.64) and CSS (adjusted-HR ranges: 1.52-1.84 and 1.66-1.81, respectively) compared to homo/non-dominance (all, P < 0.05). Among stage I-III disease, when tumors had SD, adding radiotherapy to chemotherapy was significantly associated with improved PFS (adjusted-HR: homo/dominance 0.49, and hetero/dominance 0.45) and CSS (0.36 and 0.31, respectively) compared to chemotherapy alone (all, P < 0.05); contrary, this association was not observed with absence of SD (all, P > 0.05). CONCLUSION In UCS, SD impacts survival in homologous but not in heterologous type. Regardless of sarcoma types, SD was associated with decreased survival in UCS; adding radiotherapy to chemotherapy may be an effective postoperative strategy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Koji Matsuo
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, USA.
| | - Yutaka Takazawa
- Department of Pathology, Cancer Institute Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Malcolm S Ross
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, MaGee-Womens Hospital, University of Pittsburgh, USA
| | - Esther Elishaev
- Department of Pathology, MaGee-Womens Hospital, University of Pittsburgh, USA
| | - Mayu Yunokawa
- Department of Breast and Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Todd B Sheridan
- Department of Pathology, Mercy Medical Center, Baltimore, USA
| | - Stephen H Bush
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Moffitt Cancer Center, University of South Florida, USA
| | - Merieme M Klobocista
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, USA
| | - Erin A Blake
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Colorado, USA
| | - Tadao Takano
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tohoku University, Miyagi, Japan
| | - Tsukasa Baba
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Shinya Satoh
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tottori University, Tottori, Japan
| | - Masako Shida
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tokai University, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Yuji Ikeda
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Sosuke Adachi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Niigata University, Niigata, Japan
| | - Takuhei Yokoyama
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Osaka Rosai Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | | | - Shiori Yanai
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kurashiki Medical Center, Okayama, Japan
| | - Satoshi Takeuchi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Iwate Medical University, Morioka, Japan
| | - Masato Nishimura
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tokushima University, Tokushima, Japan
| | - Keita Iwasaki
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Aichi Medical University, Aichi, Japan
| | - Marian S Johnson
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Kentucky, USA
| | - Masayuki Yoshida
- Department of Pathology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Ardeshir Hakam
- Department of Pathology, Moffitt Cancer Center, University of South Florida, USA
| | - Hiroko Machida
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, USA
| | | | - Yutaka Ueda
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan
| | - Kiyoshi Yoshino
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan
| | | | - Kosei Hasegawa
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Saitama, Japan
| | - Masanori Yasuda
- Department of Pathology, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Saitama, Japan
| | - Takahito M Miyake
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kawasaki Medical School, Okayama, Japan
| | - Takuya Moriya
- Department of Pathology, Kawasaki Medical School, Okayama, Japan
| | - Yoshiaki Yuba
- Department of Pathology, Kitano Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | - Terry Morgan
- Department of Pathology, Oregon Health & Science University, USA
| | | | - Tanja Pejovic
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oregon Health & Science University, USA
| | - Tadayoshi Nagano
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kitano Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | - Takeshi Sasaki
- Department of Pathology, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | - Miriam D Post
- Department of Pathology, University of Colorado, USA
| | - Mian M K Shahzad
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Moffitt Cancer Center, University of South Florida, USA
| | - Dwight D Im
- Department of Gynecology, Mercy Medical Center, Baltimore, USA
| | - Hiroshi Yoshida
- Department of Pathology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kohei Omatsu
- Department of Gynecology, Cancer Institute Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Frederick R Ueland
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Kentucky, USA
| | - Joseph L Kelley
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, MaGee-Womens Hospital, University of Pittsburgh, USA
| | - Rouzan G Karabakhtsian
- Department of Pathology, University of Kentucky, USA; Department of Pathology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, USA
| | - Lynda D Roman
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Matsuo K, Takazawa Y, Ross MS, Elishaev E, Yunokawa M, Sheridan TB, Bush SH, Klobocista MM, Blake EA, Takano T, Baba T, Satoh S, Shida M, Ikeda Y, Adachi S, Yokoyama T, Takekuma M, Yanai S, Takeuchi S, Nishimura M, Iwasaki K, Johnson MS, Yoshida M, Hakam A, Machida H, Mhawech-Fauceglia P, Ueda Y, Yoshino K, Kajiwara H, Hasegawa K, Yasuda M, Miyake TM, Moriya T, Yuba Y, Morgan T, Fukagawa T, Pejovic T, Nagano T, Sasaki T, Richmond AM, Post MD, Shahzad MMK, Im DD, Yoshida H, Enomoto T, Omatsu K, Ueland FR, Kelley JL, Karabakhtsian RG, Roman LD. Significance of Lymphovascular Space Invasion by the Sarcomatous Component in Uterine Carcinosarcoma. Ann Surg Oncol 2018; 25:2756-2766. [PMID: 29971677 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-018-6547-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2018] [Indexed: 01/24/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to examine the significance of lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI) with a sarcomatous component on the tumor characteristics and clinical outcomes of women with uterine carcinosarcoma (UCS). METHODS This was a secondary analysis of a prior multicenter retrospective study that examined women with stage I-IV UCS who underwent primary hysterectomy. Archived histopathology slides were reviewed and LVSI was scored as follows: LVSI with a carcinomatous component alone (LVSI-carcinoma; n = 375, 76.8%) or LVSI containing a sarcomatous component with or without a carcinomatous component (LVSI-sarcoma; n = 113, 23.2%). Qualitative metrics of LVSI were correlated to clinicopathological factors and survival outcome. RESULTS Tumors in the LVSI-sarcoma group were more likely to have sarcoma dominance (82.1 vs. 26.4%) heterologous sarcomatous component (51.3 vs. 37.9%), low-grade carcinoma (42.5 vs. 22.4%), and large tumor size (81.0 vs. 70.2%) in the primary tumor site compared with tumors in the LVSI-carcinoma group (all p < 0.05). On multivariate analysis, LVSI-sarcoma was independently associated with decreased progression-free survival (5-year rates: 34.9 vs. 40.8%, adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 1.84, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.36-2.50, p < 0.001), and cause-specific survival (5-year rates: 41.8 vs. 55.9%, adjusted HR 1.95, 95% CI 1.39-2.75, p < 0.001) compared with LVSI-carcinoma. Postoperative radiotherapy for women with LVSI-sarcoma had a higher reduction rate of recurrence/progression of disease (54% reduction, p = 0.04) compared with postoperative radiotherapy for women with LVSI-carcinoma (26% reduction, p = 0.08). CONCLUSION In UCS, the presence of a sarcomatous component in LVSI is particularly prevalent when a tumor has sarcoma dominance. Our study suggests that LVSI containing a sarcomatous component may be a predictor of decreased survival for women with UCS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Koji Matsuo
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
| | - Yutaka Takazawa
- Department of Pathology, Cancer Institute Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Malcolm S Ross
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, MaGee-Womens Hospital, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Esther Elishaev
- Department of Pathology, MaGee-Womens Hospital, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Mayu Yunokawa
- Department of Breast and Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Todd B Sheridan
- Department of Pathology, Mercy Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Stephen H Bush
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Moffitt Cancer Center, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Merieme M Klobocista
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Erin A Blake
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, USA
| | - Tadao Takano
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tohoku University, Miyagi, Japan
| | - Tsukasa Baba
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Shinya Satoh
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tottori University, Tottori, Japan
| | - Masako Shida
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tokai University, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Yuji Ikeda
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Sosuke Adachi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Niigata University, Niigata, Japan
| | - Takuhei Yokoyama
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Osaka Rosai Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | | | - Shiori Yanai
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kurashiki Medical Center, Okayama, Japan
| | - Satoshi Takeuchi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Iwate Medical University, Morioka, Japan
| | - Masato Nishimura
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tokushima University, Tokushima, Japan
| | - Keita Iwasaki
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Aichi Medical University, Aichi, Japan
| | - Marian S Johnson
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Kentucky Medical Center, Lexington, KY, USA
| | - Masayuki Yoshida
- Department of Pathology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Ardeshir Hakam
- Department of Pathology, Moffitt Cancer Center, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Hiroko Machida
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | | | - Yutaka Ueda
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan
| | - Kiyoshi Yoshino
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan
| | | | - Kosei Hasegawa
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Saitama, Japan
| | - Masanori Yasuda
- Department of Pathology, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Saitama, Japan
| | - Takahito M Miyake
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kawasaki Medical School, Okayama, Japan
| | - Takuya Moriya
- Department of Pathology, Kawasaki Medical School, Okayama, Japan
| | - Yoshiaki Yuba
- Department of Pathology, Kitano Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | - Terry Morgan
- Department of Pathology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | | | - Tanja Pejovic
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Tadayoshi Nagano
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kitano Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | - Takeshi Sasaki
- Department of Pathology, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Abby M Richmond
- Department of Pathology, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, USA
| | - Miriam D Post
- Department of Pathology, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, USA
| | - Mian M K Shahzad
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Moffitt Cancer Center, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Dwight D Im
- Department of Gynecology, Mercy Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Hiroshi Yoshida
- Department of Pathology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takayuki Enomoto
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Niigata University, Niigata, Japan
| | - Kohei Omatsu
- Department of Gynecology, Cancer Institute Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Frederick R Ueland
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Kentucky Medical Center, Lexington, KY, USA
| | - Joseph L Kelley
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, MaGee-Womens Hospital, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Rouzan G Karabakhtsian
- Department of Pathology, University of Kentucky Medical Center, Lexington, KY, USA.,Department of Pathology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Lynda D Roman
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Matsuo K, Ross MS, Im DD, Klobocista MM, Bush SH, Johnson MS, Takano T, Blake EA, Ikeda Y, Nishimura M, Ueda Y, Shida M, Hasegawa K, Baba T, Adachi S, Yokoyama T, Satoh S, Machida H, Yanai S, Iwasaki K, Miyake TM, Takeuchi S, Takekuma M, Nagano T, Yunokawa M, Pejovic T, Omatsu K, Shahzad MMK, Kelley JL, Ueland FR, Roman LD. Significance of venous thromboembolism in women with uterine carcinosarcoma. Gynecol Oncol 2017; 148:267-274. [PMID: 29248197 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2017.11.036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2017] [Revised: 11/25/2017] [Accepted: 11/29/2017] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To identify risk factors for venous thromboembolism (VTE) and to examine the association of VTE and survival in women with uterine carcinosarcoma. METHODS This multicenter retrospective study examined 906 women who underwent primary surgical treatment for stage I-IV uterine carcinosarcoma. Time-dependent analyses were performed for cumulative incidence of VTE after surgery on multivariate models. RESULTS There were 72 (7.9%) women who developed VTE after surgery with 1-, 2-, and 5-year cumulative incidences being 5.1%, 7.3%, and 10.2%, respectively. On multivariate analysis, older age (hazard ratio [HR] per year 1.03, P=0.012), non-Asian race (HR 6.28, P<0.001), large body habitus (HR per kg/m2 1.04, P=0.014), residual disease at surgery (HR 3.04, P=0.003), tumor size ≥5cm (HR 2.73, P=0.003), and stage IV disease (HR 2.12, P=0.025) were independently associated with increased risk of developing VTE. A risk pattern analysis identified that obese Non-Asian women with large tumors (13.7% of population) had the highest incidence of VTE (2-year cumulative rate, 26.1%) whereas Asian women with no residual disease (47.1% of population) had the lowest (2-year cumulative rate, 1.6%) (P<0.001). Presence of carcinoma/sarcoma in metastatic sites was significantly associated with increased risk of VTE compared to carcinoma alone (2-year rates, 31.2% versus 8.4%, P=0.049). VTE was independently associated with decreased progression-free survival on multivariate models (5-year rates, 24.9% versus 47.2%, HR 1.46, 95%CI 1.05-2.04, P=0.026). CONCLUSION Our study suggests that VTE represents a surrogate marker of aggressive tumor behavior and diminished patient condition in uterine carcinosarcoma; obese Non-Asian women with large tumors carry a disproportionally high risk of VTE, suggesting that long-term prophylaxis may benefit this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Koji Matsuo
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Southern California, CA, USA.
| | - Malcolm S Ross
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Magee-Womens Hospital, University of Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Dwight D Im
- The Gynecologic Oncology Center, Mercy Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Merieme M Klobocista
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, NY, USA
| | - Stephen H Bush
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Moffitt Cancer Center, University of South Florida, FL, USA
| | - Marian S Johnson
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Kentucky, KY, USA
| | - Tadao Takano
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tohoku University, Miyagi, Japan
| | - Erin A Blake
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Colorado, CO, USA
| | - Yuji Ikeda
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Masato Nishimura
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tokushima University, Tokushima, Japan
| | - Yutaka Ueda
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan
| | - Masako Shida
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tokai University, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Kosei Hasegawa
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Saitama, Japan
| | - Tsukasa Baba
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Sosuke Adachi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Niigata University, Niigata, Japan
| | - Takuhei Yokoyama
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Osaka Rosai Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | - Shinya Satoh
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tottori University, Tottori, Japan
| | - Hiroko Machida
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Southern California, CA, USA
| | - Shiori Yanai
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kurashiki Medical Center, Okayama, Japan
| | - Keita Iwasaki
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Aichi Medical University, Aichi, Japan
| | - Takahito M Miyake
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kawasaki Medical School, Okayama, Japan
| | - Satoshi Takeuchi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Iwate Medical University, Morioka, Japan
| | | | - Tadayoshi Nagano
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kitano Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | - Mayu Yunokawa
- Department of Breast and Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Tanja Pejovic
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oregon Health & Science University, OR, USA
| | - Kohei Omatsu
- Department of Gynecology, Cancer Institute Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Mian M K Shahzad
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Moffitt Cancer Center, University of South Florida, FL, USA
| | - Joseph L Kelley
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Magee-Womens Hospital, University of Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Frederick R Ueland
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Kentucky, KY, USA
| | - Lynda D Roman
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Southern California, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|