1
|
Carnet Le Provost K, Kepp O, Kroemer G, Bezu L. Trial watch: local anesthetics in cancer therapy. Oncoimmunology 2024; 13:2308940. [PMID: 38504848 PMCID: PMC10950281 DOI: 10.1080/2162402x.2024.2308940] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/21/2024] Open
Abstract
Preclinical evidence indicates potent antitumor properties of local anesthetics. Numerous underlying mechanisms explaining such anticancer effects have been identified, suggesting direct cytotoxic as well as indirect immunemediated effects that together reduce the proliferative, invasive and migratory potential of malignant cells. Although some retrospective and correlative studies support these findings, prospective randomized controlled trials have not yet fully confirmed the antineoplastic activity of local anesthetics, likely due to the intricate methodology required for mitigating confounding factors. This trial watch aims at compiling all published preclinical and clinical research, along with completed and ongoing trials, that explore the potential antitumor effects of local anesthetics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Killian Carnet Le Provost
- Equipe Labellisée Par La Ligue Contre Le Cancer, Université de Paris, Sorbonne Université, Centre de Recherche des Cordeliers, Institut Universitaire de France, Paris, France
- Metabolomics and Cell Biology Platforms, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | - Oliver Kepp
- Equipe Labellisée Par La Ligue Contre Le Cancer, Université de Paris, Sorbonne Université, Centre de Recherche des Cordeliers, Institut Universitaire de France, Paris, France
- Metabolomics and Cell Biology Platforms, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | - Guido Kroemer
- Equipe Labellisée Par La Ligue Contre Le Cancer, Université de Paris, Sorbonne Université, Centre de Recherche des Cordeliers, Institut Universitaire de France, Paris, France
- Metabolomics and Cell Biology Platforms, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris Saclay, Villejuif, France
- Pôle de Biologie, Hôpital européen Georges Pompidou, AP-HP, Paris, France
| | - Lucillia Bezu
- Equipe Labellisée Par La Ligue Contre Le Cancer, Université de Paris, Sorbonne Université, Centre de Recherche des Cordeliers, Institut Universitaire de France, Paris, France
- Metabolomics and Cell Biology Platforms, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris Saclay, Villejuif, France
- Gustave Roussy, Département Anesthésie, Chirurgie et Interventionnel, Villejuif, France
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Shen H, Pang Q, Gao Y, Liu H. Effects of epidural anesthesia on the prognosis of ovarian cancer-a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Anesthesiol 2023; 23:390. [PMID: 38030996 PMCID: PMC10685604 DOI: 10.1186/s12871-023-02352-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2023] [Accepted: 11/20/2023] [Indexed: 12/01/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The global low survival rate among ovarian cancer patients has resulted in significant social and economic burdens. Nevertheless, previous studies have produced mixed results when exploring the link between anesthetic techniques and the prognosis of ovarian cancer. The study aims to compare the effect of epidural anesthesia with general anesthesia on survival time after cytoreductive surgery in patients with ovarian cancer. METHODS The PubMed (National Library of Medicine), Cochrane library, Web of science, Embase, CNKI (China National Knowledge Internet), Wanfang Med Online (China database), were systematically searched from inception to May, 2023, using the Medical Subject Headings [MeSH] of "Ovarian Neoplasm" and "Anesthesia, Epidural" and free words to identify systematic reviews or meta-analyses. The research methodology involved analyzing randomized controlled trials (RCTs), as well as prospective or retrospective cohort studies, which compared the long-term prognosis of patients with ovarian cancer under general anesthesia combined with epidural anesthesia (GEA) versus general anesthesia alone (GA). The Newcastle Ottawa Scale (NOS) was used to assess methodological quality and bias. Data extraction and assessment of study quality were conducted by two independent reviewers. A meta-analysis was then performed to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Overall survival (OS) was defined as the primary outcome, time to tumor recurrence (TTR) was the secondary outcome. Epidural anesthesia could be used intraoperatively and immediately postoperatively (EIP), or postoperatively only (EP). GEA includes EIP and EP. RESULTS In total, 8 retrospective cohort studies with 2036 participants met the inclusion criteria. The pooled results demonstrated that GEA could extend OS (HR 0.75, 95% CI 0.67-0.84, I2 = 0%, P < 0.05, fixed-effect model) when compared with GA in ovarian cancer patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery, but not TTR (sensitivity analysis revealed substantial heterogeneity among the included studies). The result of analyzing a total of 1490 patients in 4 studies was that EIP had a better prognosis on OS than GA (HR 0.68, 95%CI 0.55-0.85, I2 = 61%, P < 0.05, random-effect model). However, EP had no advantage in TTR (sensitivity analysis revealed it was unstable outcome). Ovarian cancer FIGO(International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics) stage III, stage IV compared to stage I on OS was statistically significant, HRs respectively are 3.67 (95%CI 2.25-5.98), I2 = 0%, fixed-effect model, P < 0.05, and 7.43 (95%CI 3.67-15.03), I2 = 31%, fixed-effect model, P < 0.05, but there was no statistically significant difference between stage II and stage I, HR 2.00, 95%CI0.98-4.09, I2 = 0%, fixed-effect model, P > 0.05. 1-10 mm tumor residuals shorten TTR compared with 0 residuals, HR 1.75, 95% CI1.50-2.04, I2 = 0%, fixed-effect model, P < 0.05. CONCLUSIONS It is hard to conclude that postoperative epidural analgesia offers greater benefits than GA. However, general anesthesia combined with epidural anesthesia (EIP) can improve overall survival in ovarian cancer patients, allowing the anesthesiologist to use anesthesia techniques to provide a favorable prognosis for the ovarian cancer patient. Tumor staging and the extent of cell reduction are also critical factors that significantly influence the long-prognosis of ovarian cancer patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Haijian Shen
- Department of Anesthesiology, Chongqing University Cancer Hospital, Chongqing, China
| | - Qianyun Pang
- Department of Anesthesiology, Chongqing University Cancer Hospital, Chongqing, China
| | - Youzhu Gao
- Department of Anesthesiology, Chongqing University Cancer Hospital, Chongqing, China
| | - Hongliang Liu
- Department of Anesthesiology, Chongqing University Cancer Hospital, Chongqing, China.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Lu L, Sun Y, Ren Y, Zhao S, Hua Z. Effect of regional anesthesia and analgesia on long-term survival following abdominal cancer Surgery-A systematic review with meta-analysis. Heliyon 2023; 9:e20611. [PMID: 37842575 PMCID: PMC10570603 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e20611] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2023] [Revised: 09/23/2023] [Accepted: 10/02/2023] [Indexed: 10/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The impact of regional anesthesia and analgesia (RAA) on long-term survival following cancer surgery is a topic of debate. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of perioperative RAA on long-term oncological outcomes in patients undergoing major abdominal cancer surgery. Methods The authors searched computerized databases and reference lists from inception to December 20, 2022. All studies that investigated the effects of perioperative RAA on long-term oncological outcomes following major abdominal cancer surgery were included. Using the inverse variance method with a random-effects model, hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated. Results The systematic review included 51 retrospective studies, one prospective study, and three randomized controlled trials (RCTs), with a total of 95,046 patients. The results showed that perioperative RAA may improve long-term overall survival (HR: 0.85, 95% CI: 0.80 to 0.91, P = 0.00, I2 = 60.2%). However, there was no significant association between perioperative RAA and reduced cancer recurrence (HR: 0.98, 95% CI: 0.90 to 1.03, P = 0.31, I2 = 52.3%). When performing a pooled analysis of the data from the three RCTs, no statistically significant effect of RAA was found in either case. Conclusion The systematic review suggests perioperative RAA may improve long-term overall survival but does not appear to reduce cancer recurrence in patients undergoing major abdominal cancer surgery. The limited number of RCTs included in this study did not confirm this finding, highlighting the need for further RCTs to corroborate these results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Yanxia Sun
- Corresponding author. Beijing 100730, China.
| | - Yi Ren
- Department of Anesthesiology, Beijing Hospital, National Center of Gerontology, Institute of Geriatric Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing 100730, China
| | - Siwen Zhao
- Department of Anesthesiology, Beijing Hospital, National Center of Gerontology, Institute of Geriatric Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing 100730, China
| | - Zhen Hua
- Department of Anesthesiology, Beijing Hospital, National Center of Gerontology, Institute of Geriatric Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing 100730, China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Influence of Perioperative Anesthesia on Cancer Recurrence: from Basic Science to Clinical Practice. Curr Oncol Rep 2023; 25:63-81. [PMID: 36512273 PMCID: PMC9745294 DOI: 10.1007/s11912-022-01342-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/02/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSEOF REVIEW In this review, we will summarize the effects of these perioperative anesthetics and anesthetic interventions on the immune system and tumorigenesis as well as address the related clinical evidence on cancer-related mortality and recurrence. RECENT FINDINGS Cancer remains a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. For many solid tumors, surgery is one of the major therapies. Unfortunately, surgery promotes angiogenesis, shedding of circulating cancer cells, and suppresses immunity. Hence, the perioperative period has a close relationship with cancer metastases or recurrence. In the perioperative period, patients require multiple anesthetic management including anesthetics, anesthetic techniques, and body temperature control. Preclinical and retrospective studies have found that these anesthetic agents and interventions have complex effects on cancer outcomes. Therefore, well-planned, prospective, randomized controlled trials are required to explore the effects of different anesthetics and techniques on long-term outcomes after cancer surgery. Due to the conflicting effects of anesthetic management on cancer recurrence, further preclinical and clinical trials are required and beneficial to the development of systemic cancer therapies.
Collapse
|
5
|
Anic K, Schmidt MW, Droste A, Schwab R, Schmidt M, Krajnak S, Renz M, Hartmann EK, Hardt R, Hasenburg A, Battista MJ. Influence of anesthetic technique on survival after tumor debulking surgery of elderly patients with ovarian cancer: Results of a retrospective cohort study. Oncol Lett 2022; 24:361. [PMID: 36238854 PMCID: PMC9494308 DOI: 10.3892/ol.2022.13481] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2022] [Accepted: 07/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
Epidural analgesia could influence the postoperative oncologic outcomes in patients with specific types of non-metastatic solid neoplasms. The present study aimed to investigate the impact of anesthetic technique on survival in elderly patients with ovarian cancer (OC). The records of all women with OC older than 60 years of age undergoing tumor debulking surgery at the University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz (Mainz, Germany) between January 2008 and December 2019 were obtained. The study cohort was divided into two groups based on the use of perioperative epidural anesthesia or not. First, Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed to analyze the prognostic influence of anesthetic technique on survival. Second, multivariate Cox proportional hazards model was adjusted for multiple conventional prognostic factors concerning three main categories: i) Current clinical-pathological tumor characteristics; ii) anesthesiologic parameters, including mean age, American Society of Anesthesiologists Performance Status and preexisting comorbidities summarized in the Charlson Comorbidity Index; and iii) oncological and surgical parameters such as oncological radicality and Surgical complexity Score. A total of 110 patients were included in the study and 71 (64.5%) of them received epidural analgesia. The median survival time was 26.0 months from primary debulking surgery and no significant differences in progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were noted between the 'Epidural' and 'non-Epidural' cohorts. After adjustment for the selected risk factors from the three categories, the effects of epidural analgesia on PFS and OS remained non-significant [PFS: hazard ratio (HR), 1.26; 95% CI, 0.66-2.39; and OS: HR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.45-1.40]. The present results did not support the independent association between epidural-supplemented anesthesia and improved PFS or OS in elderly patients with standardized ovarian cancer debulking surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katharina Anic
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Medical Center of The Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, D-55131 Mainz, Germany,Correspondence to: Dr Katharina Anic, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Langenbeckstr. 1, D-55131 Mainz, Germany, E-mail:
| | - Mona Wanda Schmidt
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Medical Center of The Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, D-55131 Mainz, Germany
| | - Annika Droste
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Medical Center of The Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, D-55131 Mainz, Germany
| | - Roxana Schwab
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Medical Center of The Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, D-55131 Mainz, Germany
| | - Marcus Schmidt
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Medical Center of The Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, D-55131 Mainz, Germany
| | - Slavomir Krajnak
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Medical Center of The Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, D-55131 Mainz, Germany
| | - Miriam Renz
- Department of Anesthesiology, University Medical Center of The Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, D-55131 Mainz, Germany
| | - Erik Kristoffer Hartmann
- Department of Anesthesiology, University Medical Center of The Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, D-55131 Mainz, Germany
| | - Roland Hardt
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, University Medical Center of The Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, D-55131 Mainz, Germany
| | - Annette Hasenburg
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Medical Center of The Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, D-55131 Mainz, Germany
| | - Marco Johannes Battista
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Medical Center of The Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, D-55131 Mainz, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Zhang D, Jiang J, Liu J, Zhu T, Huang H, Zhou C. Effects of Perioperative Epidural Analgesia on Cancer Recurrence and Survival. Front Oncol 2022; 11:798435. [PMID: 35071003 PMCID: PMC8766638 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.798435] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2021] [Accepted: 12/10/2021] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Surgical resection is the main curative avenue for various cancers. Unfortunately, cancer recurrence following surgery is commonly seen, and typically results in refractory disease and death. Currently, there is no consensus whether perioperative epidural analgesia (EA), including intraoperative and postoperative epidural analgesia, is beneficial or harmful on cancer recurrence and survival. Although controversial, mounting evidence from both clinical and animal studies have reported perioperative EA can improve cancer recurrence and survival via many aspects, including modulating the immune/inflammation response and reducing the use of anesthetic agents like inhalation anesthetics and opioids, which are independent risk factors for cancer recurrence. However, these results depend on the cancer types, cancer staging, patients age, opioids use, and the duration of follow-up. This review will summarize the effects of perioperative EA on the oncological outcomes of patients after cancer surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Donghang Zhang
- Department of Anesthesiology, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.,Laboratory of Anesthesia and Critical Care Medicine, National-Local Joint Engineering Research Centre of Translational Medicine of Anesthesiology, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Jingyao Jiang
- Laboratory of Anesthesia and Critical Care Medicine, National-Local Joint Engineering Research Centre of Translational Medicine of Anesthesiology, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Jin Liu
- Department of Anesthesiology, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.,Laboratory of Anesthesia and Critical Care Medicine, National-Local Joint Engineering Research Centre of Translational Medicine of Anesthesiology, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Tao Zhu
- Department of Anesthesiology, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Han Huang
- Department of Anesthesiology & Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children, Ministry of Education, West China Second Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Cheng Zhou
- Laboratory of Anesthesia and Critical Care Medicine, National-Local Joint Engineering Research Centre of Translational Medicine of Anesthesiology, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Zhang H, Gu J, Qu M, Sun Z, Huang Q, Cata JP, Chen W, Miao C. Effects of Intravenous Infusion of Lidocaine on Short-Term Outcomes and Survival in Patients Undergoing Surgery for Ovarian Cancer: A Retrospective Propensity Score Matching Study. Front Oncol 2022; 11:689832. [PMID: 35070949 PMCID: PMC8770535 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.689832] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2021] [Accepted: 12/13/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Intravenous lidocaine has been shown to reduce opioid consumption and is associated with favourable outcomes after surgery. In this study, we explored whether intraoperative lidocaine reduces intraoperative opioid use and length of stay (LOS) and improves long-term survival after primary debulking surgery for ovarian cancer and explored the correlation between SCN9A expression and ovarian cancer prognosis. Methods This retrospective study included patients who underwent primary debulking surgery(PDS) for ovarian cancer from January 2015 to December 2018. The patients were divided into non-lidocaine and lidocaine [bolus injection of 1.5 mg/kg lidocaine at the induction of anaesthesia followed by a continuous infusion of 2 mg/(kg∙h) intraoperatively] groups. Intraoperative opioid consumption, the verbal numeric rating scale (VNRS) at rest and LOS were recorded. Propensity score matching was used to minimize bias, and disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared between the two groups. Results After propensity score matching(PSM), the demographics were not significantly different between the groups. The intraoperative sufentanil consumption in the lidocaine group was significantly lower than that in the non-lidocaine group (Mean: 35.6 μg vs. 43.2 μg, P=0.035). LOS was similar between the groups (12.0 days vs. 12.4 days, P=0.386). There was a significant difference in DFS between the groups (32.3% vs. 21.6%, P=0.015), and OS rates were significantly higher in the lidocaine group than in the non-lidocaine group (35.2% vs. 25.6%, P=0.042). Multivariate analysis indicated that intraoperative lidocaine infusion was associated with prolonged OS and DFS. Conclusion Intraoperative intravenous lidocaine infusion appears to be associated with improved OS and DFS in patients undergoing primary debulking surgery for ovarian cancer. Our study has the limitations of a retrospective review. Hence, our results should be confirmed by a prospective randomized controlled trial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hao Zhang
- Department of Anesthesiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Jiahui Gu
- Department of Anesthesiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Mengdi Qu
- Department of Anesthesiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Zhirong Sun
- Department of Anesthesiology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Centre, Shanghai, China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Qihong Huang
- Cancer Center, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.,Shanghai Respiratory Research Institute, Shanghai, China.,Institute of Clinical Sciences, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Juan P Cata
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Centre, Houston, TX, United States.,Anesthesiology and Surgical Oncology Research Group, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Wankun Chen
- Department of Anesthesiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Changhong Miao
- Department of Anesthesiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
穆 东, 薛 铖, 安 彬, 王 东. [Epidural block associated with improved long-term survival after surgery for colorectal cancer: A retrospective cohort study with propensity score matching]. BEIJING DA XUE XUE BAO. YI XUE BAN = JOURNAL OF PEKING UNIVERSITY. HEALTH SCIENCES 2021; 53:1152-1158. [PMID: 34916697 PMCID: PMC8695148 DOI: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167x.2021.06.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/26/2019] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate the effect of epidural anesthesia on the long-term prognosis of patients after selective colorectal cancer resection surgery. METHODS This was a retrospective cohort study and approved by local institution review board. Patients who underwent selective colorectal cancer resection surgery from August 2011 to December 2012 in Peking University First Hospital were enrolled. The patients were divided into general anesthesia (GA) group and combined epidural-general anesthesia (EGA) group according to anesthesia type. Primary outcome was patient's long-term survival status. Secondary outcome included the overall incidence of in-hospital complications and length of postoperative in-hospital stay. Propensity score was used to match cases between the two groups based on the probability of receiving EGA. Survival was analyzed by Kaplan-Meier analysis and compared by Log-rank test between the two groups. Multivariate Cox regression analysis was used to investigate the relationship between epidural anesthesia and other variables with long-term survival status. RESULTS A total of 264 patients were entered into final analysis, including 166 cases in GA group and 98 cases in EGA group. Mean age of the patients was (63.3±12.1) years and mean survival time was 47.2 (95%CI 45.7-48.7) months. Before the propensity score match, the mortality in EGA group was 16.9% (28/166) and 9.2% (9/98) in GA group. But comparison between the two groups had no statistical significance (P=0.091). After the propensity score match, 87 paired cases were matched and analyzed. The risk of long-term mortality in EGA group was lower than that of GA group by Kaplan-Meier analysis (5.7% vs.16.1%, HR=0.344, 95%CI 0.124-0.955, P=0.041). Mean survival time of EGA group was longer than that of GA group (50.3 months vs. 42.9 months, P=0.032). Multivariate Cox regression ana-lysis showed that EGA, in comparison with GA, was related with lower risk of long-term mortality (HR=0.326, 95%CI 0.117-0.909, P=0.032). Age (HR=1.042, 95%CI 1.001-1.085, P=0.046) and preoperative lymph node metastasis (HR=2.924, 95%CI 1.162-7.356, P=0.023) were also related with increased risk of long-term mortality. CONCLUSION Present study found that perioperative use of epidural anesthesia and analgesia was associated with improvement of the patient's long-term survival. Well-designed studies are needed to verify this hypothesis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- 东亮 穆
- 北京大学第一医院麻醉科,北京 100034Department of Anesthesiology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing 100034, China
| | - 铖 薛
- 北京大学第一医院麻醉科,北京 100034Department of Anesthesiology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing 100034, China
| | - 彬 安
- 航天中心医院麻醉科,北京 100049Department of Anesthesiology, Aerospace Center Hospital, Beijing 100049, China
| | - 东信 王
- 北京大学第一医院麻醉科,北京 100034Department of Anesthesiology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing 100034, China
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Tseng WC, Lee MS, Lin YC, Lai HC, Yu MH, Wu KL, Wu ZF. Propofol-Based Total Intravenous Anesthesia is Associated with Better Survival than Desflurane Anesthesia in Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Surgery: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Front Pharmacol 2021; 12:685265. [PMID: 34630078 PMCID: PMC8497698 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2021.685265] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2021] [Accepted: 09/10/2021] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Previous studies have shown that anesthetic techniques can affect outcomes of cancer surgery. We investigated the association between anesthetic techniques and patient outcomes after elective epithelial ovarian cancer surgery. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of patients who received elective open surgery for epithelial ovarian cancer between January 2009 and December 2014. Patients were grouped according to the administration of propofol or desflurane anesthesia. Kaplan–Meier analysis was performed, and survival curves were constructed from the date of surgery to death. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression models were used to compare hazard ratios for death after propensity matching. Subgroup analyses were performed for age, body mass index, preoperative carbohydrate antigen-125 level, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics staging, and operation and anesthesia time. Results: In total, 165 patients (76 deaths, 46.1%) who received desflurane anesthesia and 119 (30 deaths, 25.2%) who received propofol anesthesia were eligible for analysis. After propensity matching, 104 patients were included in each group. In the matched analysis, patients who received propofol anesthesia had better survival with a hazard ratio of 0.52 (95% confidence interval, 0.33–0.81; p = 0.005). Subgroup analyses also showed significantly better survival with old age, high body mass index, elevated carbohydrate antigen-125 level, advanced International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage, and prolonged operation and anesthesia time in the matched propofol group. In addition, patients administered with propofol anesthesia had less postoperative recurrence and metastasis than those administered with desflurane anesthesia in the matched analysis. Conclusion: Propofol anesthesia was associated with better survival in patients who underwent elective epithelial ovarian cancer open surgery. Prospective studies are warranted to evaluate the effects of propofol anesthesia on oncological outcomes in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wei-Cheng Tseng
- Department of Anesthesiology, Tri-Service General Hospital and National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Meei-Shyuan Lee
- School of Public Health, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Ying-Chih Lin
- School of Public Health, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Hou-Chuan Lai
- Department of Anesthesiology, Tri-Service General Hospital and National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Mu-Hsien Yu
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tri-Service General Hospital and National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Ke-Li Wu
- Department of General Medicine, Tri-Service General Hospital and National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Zhi-Fu Wu
- Department of Anesthesiology, Tri-Service General Hospital and National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan.,Department of Anesthesiology, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.,Department of Anesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Noh JJ, Kim MS, Lee YY. The implementation of enhanced recovery after surgery protocols in ovarian malignancy surgery. Gland Surg 2021; 10:1182-1194. [PMID: 33842264 DOI: 10.21037/gs.2020.04.07] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
The enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) refers to multimodal interventions to reduce the length of hospital stay and complications at various steps of perioperative care. It was first developed in colorectal surgery and later embraced by other surgical disciplines including gynecologic oncology. The ERAS Society recently published guidelines for gynecologic cancer surgeries to enhance patient recovery. However, limitations exist in the implementation of the guidelines in ovarian cancer patients due to the distinct characteristics of the disease. In the present review, we discuss the results that have been published in the literature to date regarding the ERAS protocols in ovarian cancer patients, and explain why more evidence needs to be specifically assessed in this type of malignancy among other gynecologic cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph J Noh
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Myeong-Seon Kim
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, St. Vincent's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
| | - Yoo-Young Lee
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Dockrell L, Buggy DJ. The role of regional anaesthesia in the emerging subspecialty of onco-anaesthesia: a state-of-the-art review. Anaesthesia 2021; 76 Suppl 1:148-159. [PMID: 33426658 DOI: 10.1111/anae.15243] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/25/2020] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
Cancer accounts for millions of deaths globally each year, predominantly due to recurrence and metastatic disease. The majority of patients with primary solid organ cancers require surgery, however, some degree of tumour dissemination related to surgery is inevitable. The surgical stress response and associated immunosuppression, pain, inflammation, tissue hypoxia and angiogenesis have all been implicated in promoting tumour survival, proliferation and recurrence. Regional anaesthesia was hypothesised to reduce the surgical stress response and immunosuppression, minimise the need for volatile anaesthesia and reduce pain and opioid requirements, thus mitigating pro-tumour pathways associated with the peri-operative period and improving long-term oncological outcomes. While some retrospective studies suggested an association between regional anaesthesia and reduced cancer recurrence, the first large randomised controlled trial on the effect of anaesthetic technique on cancer outcome found no significant difference between paravertebral regional anaesthesia and volatile anaesthesia with opioid analgesia in patients undergoing breast cancer surgery. Randomised controlled trials on the long-term oncological outcomes of regional anaesthesia in other tumour types are ongoing. The focus on how peri-operative interventions, especially regional anaesthesia, during cancer resection surgery, may enhance short-term recovery and perhaps influence long-term outcome has spawned the global emergence of the subspecialty of onco-anaesthesia. This review aims to discuss the most recent evidence on the use of regional anaesthesia in cancer surgery and the significance of its role in onco-anaesthesia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L Dockrell
- Division of Anaesthesiology and Peri-operative Medicine, Mater University Hospital, School of Medicine, University College Dublin, Ireland
| | - D J Buggy
- Division of Anaesthesiology and Peri-operative Medicine, Mater University Hospital, School of Medicine, University College Dublin, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Bhandoria GP, Bhandarkar P, Ahuja V, Maheshwari A, Sekhon RK, Gultekin M, Ayhan A, Demirkiran F, Kahramanoglu I, Wan YLL, Knapp P, Dobroch J, Zmaczyński A, Jach R, Nelson G. Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) in gynecologic oncology: an international survey of peri-operative practice. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2020; 30:1471-1478. [PMID: 32753562 DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2020-001683] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2020] [Revised: 07/07/2020] [Accepted: 07/09/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) programs have been shown to improve clinical outcomes in gynecologic oncology, with the majority of published reports originating from a small number of specialized centers. It is unclear to what degree ERAS is implemented in hospitals globally. This international survey investigated the status of ERAS protocol implementation in open gynecologic oncology surgery to provide a worldwide perspective on peri-operative practice patterns. METHODS Requests to participate in an online survey of ERAS practices were distributed via social media (WhatsApp, Twitter, and Social Link). The survey was active between January 15 and March 15, 2020. Additionally, four national gynecologic oncology societies agreed to distribute the study among their members. Respondents were requested to answer a 17-item questionnaire about their ERAS practice preferences in the pre-, intra-, and post-operative periods. RESULTS Data from 454 respondents representing 62 countries were analyzed. Overall, 37% reported that ERAS was implemented at their institution. The regional distribution was: Europe 38%, Americas 33%, Asia 19%, and Africa 10%. ERAS gynecologic oncology guidelines were well adhered to (>80%) in the domains of deep vein thrombosis prophylaxis, early removal of urinary catheter after surgery, and early introduction of ambulation. Areas with poor adherence to the guidelines included the use of bowel preparation, adoption of modern fasting guidelines, carbohydrate loading, use of nasogastric tubes and peritoneal drains, intra-operative temperature monitoring, and early feeding. CONCLUSION This international survey of ERAS in open gynecologic oncology surgery shows that, while some practices are consistent with guideline recommendations, many practices contradict the established evidence. Efforts are required to decrease the variation in peri-operative care that exists in order to improve clinical outcomes for patients with gynecologic cancer globally.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Prashant Bhandarkar
- WHO Collaborating Centre (WHOCC) for Research in Surgical Needs in LMIC, BARC Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Vijay Ahuja
- Gynecological Oncology, Manipal Hospitals, Bangalore, Karnataka, India
| | - Amita Maheshwari
- Gynecologic Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Rupinder K Sekhon
- URO-GYNAE, Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute and Research Centre, Delhi, India
| | - Murat Gultekin
- Cancer Control Department, Turkish Ministry of Health, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Ali Ayhan
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Baskent University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Fuat Demirkiran
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Istanbul University Cerrrahpasa Medical Faculty, istanbul, Turkey
| | - Ilker Kahramanoglu
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Istanbul University Cerrrahpasa Medical Faculty, istanbul, Turkey
| | - Yee-Loi Louise Wan
- Gynaecological Oncology, The University of Manchester Faculty of Medical and Human Sciences, Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Pawel Knapp
- University Oncology Center, Uniwersytet Medyczny w Bialymstoku, Bialystok, Poland
| | - Jakub Dobroch
- Gynecologic Oncology, Medical University of Bialystok, Bialystok, Poland
| | - Andrzej Zmaczyński
- Department of Gynecological Endocrinology, Jagiellonian University, Krakow, Małopolska, Poland
| | - Robert Jach
- Department of Gynecology and Oncology, Jagiellonian University, Krakow, Poland
| | - Gregg Nelson
- Gynecologic Oncology, Tom Baker Cancer Centre, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Cata JP, Guerra C, Soto G, Ramirez MF. Anesthesia Options and the Recurrence of Cancer: What We Know so Far? Local Reg Anesth 2020; 13:57-72. [PMID: 32765061 PMCID: PMC7369361 DOI: 10.2147/lra.s240567] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2020] [Accepted: 06/23/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Surgery is a critical period in the survival of patients with cancer. While resective surgery of primary tumors has shown to prolong the life of these patients, it can also promote mechanisms associated with metastatic progression. During surgery, patients require general and sometimes local anesthetics that also modulate mechanisms that can favor or reduce metastasis. In this narrative review, we summarized the evidence about the impact of local, regional and general anesthesia on metastatic mechanisms and the survival of patients. The available evidence suggests that cancer recurrence is not significantly impacted by neither regional anesthesia nor volatile or total intravenous anesthesia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juan P Cata
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.,Anesthesiology and Surgical Oncology Research Group, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Carlos Guerra
- Department of Anesthesia, Pain Management, and Perioperative Medicine, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - German Soto
- Department of Anesthesiology, Hospital Eva Perón, Rosario, Santa Fe, Argentina
| | - Maria F Ramirez
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.,Anesthesiology and Surgical Oncology Research Group, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Kim CH, Lefkowits C, Holschneider C, Bixel K, Pothuri B. Managing opioid use in the acute surgical setting: A society of gynecologic oncology clinical practice statement. Gynecol Oncol 2020; 157:563-569. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.01.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2019] [Accepted: 01/15/2020] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
|
15
|
Wijk L, Udumyan R, Pache B, Altman AD, Williams LL, Elias KM, McGee J, Wells T, Gramlich L, Holcomb K, Achtari C, Ljungqvist O, Dowdy SC, Nelson G. International validation of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Society guidelines on enhanced recovery for gynecologic surgery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2019; 221:237.e1-237.e11. [PMID: 31051119 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.04.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 78] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2019] [Revised: 04/17/2019] [Accepted: 04/24/2019] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Society publishes guidelines on perioperative care, but these guidelines should be validated prospectively. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the association between compliance with Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Gynecologic/Oncology guideline elements and postoperative outcomes in an international cohort. STUDY DESIGN The study comprised 2101 patients undergoing elective gynecologic/oncology surgery between January 2011 and November 2017 in 10 hospitals across Canada, the United States, and Europe. Patient demographics, surgical/anesthesia details, and Enhanced Recovery After Surgery protocol compliance elements (pre-, intra-, and postoperative phases) were entered into the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Interactive Audit System. Surgical complexity was stratified according to the Aletti scoring system (low vs medium/high). The following covariates were accounted for in the analysis: age, body mass index, smoking status, presence of diabetes, American Society of Anesthesiologists class, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage, preoperative chemotherapy, radiotherapy, operating time, surgical approach (open vs minimally invasive), intraoperative blood loss, hospital, and Enhanced Recovery After Surgery implementation status. The primary end points were primary hospital length of stay and complications. Negative binomial regression was used to model length of stay, and logistic regression to model complications, as a function of compliance score and covariates. RESULTS Patient demographics included a median age 56 years, 35.5% obese, 15% smokers, and 26.7% American Society of Anesthesiologists Class III-IV. Final diagnosis was malignant in 49% of patients. Laparotomy was used in 75.9% of cases, and the remainder minimally invasive surgery. The majority of cases (86%) were of low complexity (Aletti score ≤3). In patients with ovarian cancer, 69.5% had a medium/high complexity surgery (Aletti score 4-11). Median length of stay was 2 days in the low- and 5 days in the medium/high-complexity group. Every unit increase in Enhanced Recovery After Surgery guideline score was associated with 8% (IRR, 0.92; 95% confidence interval, 0.90-0.95; P<.001) decrease in days in hospital among low-complexity, and 12% (IRR, 0.88; 95% confidence interval, 0.82-0.93; P<.001) decrease among patients with medium/high-complexity scores. For every unit increase in Enhanced Recovery After Surgery guideline score, the odds of total complications were estimated to be 12% lower (P<.05) among low-complexity patients. CONCLUSION Audit of surgical practices demonstrates that improved compliance with Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Gynecologic/Oncology guidelines is associated with an improvement in clinical outcomes, including length of stay, highlighting the importance of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery implementation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lena Wijk
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Örebro University Hospital, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Sweden.
| | - Ruzan Udumyan
- Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Medical Sciences, Örebro University, Sweden
| | - Basile Pache
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Alon D Altman
- Winnipeg Health Sciences Centre, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
| | - Laura L Williams
- Gynecologic Oncology of Middle Tennessee, HCA Centennial Hospital, Nashville, TN
| | - Kevin M Elias
- Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Jake McGee
- London Health Sciences Centre, London, ON, Canada
| | | | | | - Kevin Holcomb
- Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | - Chahin Achtari
- Gynecology Service, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Olle Ljungqvist
- Department of Surgery, Örebro University Hospital, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Sweden
| | - Sean C Dowdy
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Gregg Nelson
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Tom Baker Cancer Centre, Calgary, AB, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
The role of regional anesthesia in the propagation of cancer: A comprehensive review. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol 2019; 33:507-522. [PMID: 31791567 DOI: 10.1016/j.bpa.2019.07.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2019] [Accepted: 07/09/2019] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
New cancer incidences worldwide will eclipse 18 million in 2019, with nearly 10 million cancer-related deaths. It is estimated that in the United States, almost 40% of individuals will be diagnosed with cancer in their lifetime. Surgical resection of primary tumors remains a cornerstone of cancer treatment; however, the surgical process can trigger an immune-suppressing sympathetic response, which promotes tumor growth of any residual cancerous cells post surgery. Regional and local anesthesia have become staples of anesthesia and analgesia during and after surgery. Recently, much evidence in the form of retrospective and prospective studies has come to light regarding the protective, antitumor properties of anesthetic and analgesic agents across a wide variety of cancers and patient demographics. It is believed that by blocking afferent pain signals, the body does not mount the sympathetic response that contributes to the perpetuation of disease after surgical treatment. This review, therefore, investigates these studies as they pertain to the treatment and outcomes of cancers treated surgically to elucidate the role of regional anesthesia in the propagation of cancer.
Collapse
|
17
|
Influence of perioperative anaesthetic and analgesic interventions on oncological outcomes: a narrative review. Br J Anaesth 2019; 123:135-150. [PMID: 31255291 DOI: 10.1016/j.bja.2019.04.062] [Citation(s) in RCA: 136] [Impact Index Per Article: 27.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2018] [Revised: 03/18/2019] [Accepted: 04/23/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Surgery is an important treatment modality for the majority of solid organ cancers. Unfortunately, cancer recurrence following surgery of curative intent is common, and typically results in refractory disease and patient death. Surgery and other perioperative interventions induce a biological state conducive to the survival and growth of residual cancer cells released from the primary tumour intraoperatively, which may influence the risk of a subsequent metastatic disease. Evidence is accumulating that anaesthetic and analgesic interventions could affect many of these pathophysiological processes, influencing risk of cancer recurrence in either a beneficial or detrimental way. Much of this evidence is from experimental in vitro and in vivo models, with clinical evidence largely limited to retrospective observational studies or post hoc analysis of RCTs originally designed to evaluate non-cancer outcomes. This narrative review summarises the current state of evidence regarding the potential effect of perioperative anaesthetic and analgesic interventions on cancer biology and clinical outcomes. Proving a causal link will require data from prospective RCTs with oncological outcomes as primary endpoints, a number of which will report in the coming years. Until then, there is insufficient evidence to recommend any particular anaesthetic or analgesic technique for patients undergoing tumour resection surgery on the basis that it might alter the risk of recurrence or metastasis.
Collapse
|