Inversely and adaptively planned interstitial brachytherapy: A single implant approach

Dosimetric and toxicity comparison between Syed-Neblett and Fletcher-Suit-Delclos Tandem and Ovoid applicators in high dose rate cervix cancer brachytherapy

PURPOSE

To compare patient and tumor characteristics, dosimetry, and toxicities between interstitial Syed-Neblett and intracavitary Fletcher-Suit-Delclos Tandem and Ovoid (T&O) applicators in high dose rate (HDR) cervical cancer brachytherapy.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed for cervical cancer patients treated with 3D-based HDR brachytherapy from 2011 to 2023 at a single institution. Dosimetric parameters for high-risk clinical target volume and organs at risk were obtained. Toxicities were evaluated using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0.

RESULTS

A total of 115 and 58 patients underwent Syed and T&O brachytherapy, respectively. Patients treated with Syed brachytherapy were more likely to have larger tumors and FIGO stage III or IV disease. The median D2cc values to the bladder, small bowel, and sigmoid colon were significantly lower for Syed brachytherapy. Patients treated with Syed brachytherapy were significantly more likely to be free of acute gastrointestinal (44% vs. 21%, p = 0.003), genitourinary (58% vs. 36%, p = 0.01), and vaginal toxicities (60% vs. 33%, p = 0.001) within 6 months following treatment compared to patients treated with T&O applicators. In contrast, Syed brachytherapy patients were more likely to experience late gastrointestinal (68% vs. 49%, p = 0.082), genitourinary (51% vs. 35%, p = 0.196), and vaginal toxicities (70% vs. 57%, p = 0.264).

CONCLUSIONS

Syed-Neblett and T&O applicators are suitable for HDR brachytherapy for cervical cancer in distinct patient populations. Acute toxicities are more prevalent with T&O applicators, while patients treated with Syed-Neblett applicators are more likely to develop late toxicities.

Opioid consumption and pain in patients with gynecological cancer who underwent spinal anesthesia vs. general anesthesia for interstitial brachytherapy

AIMS

Interstitial brachytherapy (ISBT) is an effective option for delivering conformal high dose radiation to the target volume with better organ-at risk sparing but is thought to be more invasive and painful than other methods. This study investigated pain levels and opioid consumption in patients who received spinal anesthesia (SA) or general anesthesia (GA) for their ISBT.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients that underwent ISBT from April 2014 to September 2018 were analyzed from a prospective institutional database. The most prevalent malignancies were cervical (45%), recurrent endometrial (27%) and vaginal (20%) cancers. Baseline patient characteristics, radiation treatment details, anesthesia records, and inpatient charts were obtained. Opioid consumption was quantified as oral morphine equivalent per day (OMEq/day) from implantation until removal. Pain score levels were collected by using an 11-point scoring system.

RESULTS

Ninety nine patients received GA and 40 patients received SA as their anesthesia for ISBT. During their first admission, 76 patients (55%) required intravenous opioids. Patients receiving SA had significantly lower mean pain scores on the morning of their procedure 6 (Interquartile range [IQR] 2-8) vs. 0 (IQR: 0-1); p < 0.001]. Pain did not significantly differ between cohorts at any other time. During the first admission, SA patients had a lower median opioid usage of 23 (IQR: 9-47) mg/day compared to GA patients at 38 (IQR: 21-71) mg/day (p = 0.011). No difference in opioid consumption was seen during subsequent admissions.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients undergoing ISBT, SA provides better immediate pain control post insertion compared to GA. Patients who received SA used lower amounts of opioids during their first ISBT insertion.

Inter-fractional variation of markers and applicators in single-implant high-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy for gynecologic malignancies

PURPOSE

Implanted fiducial markers are a commonly used tool in delineating the CTV in high-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy (HDR-ISBT) for gynecologic malignancy, but their reliability in gynacological sites is not well understood. These markers and interstitial applicators can experience interfractional motion due to organ swelling or other anatomical changes. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the spatial variation of these features.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The spatial positions of 50 implanted markers and 202 needles were tracked in 15 patients treated over 70 fractions of HDR brachytherapy. Marker and/or needle coordinates were extracted from CT images with contours and dose distributions. Automated analysis determined marker self-consistency and displacements between various elements of the implant.

RESULTS

From start to end fraction, the relative positions of the markers experienced an average magnitude displacement of 4.5 ± 3.0 mm while the average displacement of the applicator tips was 11 ± 8 mm, relative to their respective centers of mass (CM).

CONCLUSIONS

Markers implanted lateral and superior to the CTV experience greater drift than other implant locations.

Interstitial brachytherapy for gynecologic malignancies: Complications, toxicities, and management

From both a disease and management perspective, locally advanced gynecologic cancers present a significant challenge. Dose escalation with brachytherapy serves as a key treatment, providing conformal radiation while sparing at-risk organs. Intracavitary brachytherapy techniques have been shown to be effective, with improving tumor control and toxicity profiles with the advent of three-dimensional image planning. Despite this, the variations in tumor size, location, and pelvic anatomy may lead to suboptimal dosimetry with standard intracavitary applicators in some clinical scenarios. The addition of interstitial needles (interstitial brachytherapy (ISBT)) can improve the conformality of brachytherapy treatments by adding needles to peripheral (and central) regions of the target volume, improving the ability to escalate doses in these undercovered regions while sparing organs at risk. Interstitial brachytherapy can be delivered by intracavitary and interstitial hybrid applicators (ICBT/ISBT), perineal template (P-ISBT), or by free-hand technique. ISBT has however yet to be widely available because of concerns of complications and toxicities from this specialized treatment. However, with the increasing use of three-dimensional image-guided brachytherapy, there is an opportunity to increase the level of expertise in the gynecologic radiation oncology community with an improved understanding of the potential complications and morbidity. In this article, we review the acute and long-term toxicity in both ICBT/ISBT and P-ISBT using image-guided brachytherapy.