1
|
Ratnaparkhi R, Javellana M, Jewell A, Spoozak L. Evaluation of Homologous Recombination Deficiency in Ovarian Cancer. Curr Treat Options Oncol 2024; 25:237-260. [PMID: 38300479 DOI: 10.1007/s11864-024-01176-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/03/2024] [Indexed: 02/02/2024]
Abstract
OPINION STATEMENT Homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) is an important biomarker guiding selection of ovarian cancer patients who will derive the most benefit from poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi). HRD prevents cells from repairing double-stranded DNA damage with high fidelity, PARPis limit single-stranded repair, and together these deficits induce synthetic lethality. Germline or somatic BRCA mutations represent the narrowest definition of HRD, but do not reflect all patients who will have a durable PARPi response. HRD can also be defined by its downstream consequences, which are measured by different metrics depending on the test used. Ideally, all patients will undergo genetic counseling and germline testing shortly after diagnosis and have somatic testing sent once an adequate tumor sample is available. Should barriers to one test be higher, pursuing germline testing with reflex to somatic testing for BRCA wildtype patients or somatic testing first strategies are both evidence-based. Ultimately both tests offer complementary information, germline testing should be pursued for any patient with a history of ovarian cancer, and somatic testing is valuable at recurrence if not performed in the upfront setting. There is a paucity of data to suggest superiority of one germline or somatic assay; therefore, selection should optimize turnaround time, cost to patients, preferred result format, and logistical burden. Each clinic should implement a standard testing strategy for all ovarian cancer patients that ensures HRD status is known at the time of upfront chemotherapy completion to facilitate comprehensive counseling about anticipated maintenance PARPi benefit.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rubina Ratnaparkhi
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA.
| | - Melissa Javellana
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA
| | - Andrea Jewell
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA
| | - Lori Spoozak
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Jank P, Leichsenring J, Kolb S, Hoffmann I, Bischoff P, Kunze CA, Dragomir MP, Gleitsmann M, Jesinghaus M, Schmitt WD, Kulbe H, Sers C, Stenzinger A, Sehouli J, Braicu IE, Westhoff C, Horst D, Denkert C, Gröschel S, Taube ET. High EVI1 and PARP1 expression as favourable prognostic markers in high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma. J Ovarian Res 2023; 16:150. [PMID: 37525239 PMCID: PMC10388497 DOI: 10.1186/s13048-023-01239-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2023] [Accepted: 07/16/2023] [Indexed: 08/02/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Mechanisms of development and progression of high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) are poorly understood. EVI1 and PARP1, part of TGF-ß pathway, are upregulated in cancers with DNA repair deficiencies with DNA repair deficiencies and may influce disease progression and survival. Therefore we questioned the prognostic significance of protein expression of EVI1 alone and in combination with PARP1 and analyzed them in a cohort of patients with HGSOC. METHODS For 562 HGSOC patients, we evaluated EVI1 and PARP1 expression by immunohistochemical staining on tissue microarrays with QuPath digital semi-automatic positive cell detection. RESULTS High EVI1 expressing (> 30% positive tumor cells) HGSOC were associated with improved progression-free survival (PFS) (HR = 0.66, 95% CI: 0.504-0.852, p = 0.002) and overall survival (OS) (HR = 0.45, 95% CI: 0.352-0.563, p < 0.001), including multivariate analysis. Most interestingly, mutual high expression of both proteins identifies a group with particularly good prognosis. Our findings were proven technically and clinically using bioinformatical data sets for single-cell sequencing, copy number variation and gene as well as protein expression. CONCLUSIONS EVI1 and PARP1 are robust prognostic biomarkers for favorable prognosis in HGSOC and imply further research with respect to their reciprocity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul Jank
- Institute of Pathology, Philipps-University Marburg, University Hospital Marburg (UKGM), Marburg, Germany
| | - Jonas Leichsenring
- Institute of Pathology, Zytologie Und Molekulare Diagnostik, REGIOMED, Klinikum Coburg, Coburg, Germany
| | - Svenja Kolb
- Department of Gynecology, Vivantes Netzwerk Für Gesundheit GmbH Berlin, Vivantes Hospital Neukölln, Rudower Straße 48, 12351, Berlin, Germany
| | - Inga Hoffmann
- Institute of Pathology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität Zu Berlin, CCM, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany
| | - Philip Bischoff
- Institute of Pathology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität Zu Berlin, CCM, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany
| | - Catarina Alisa Kunze
- Institute of Pathology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität Zu Berlin, CCM, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany
| | - Mihnea P Dragomir
- Institute of Pathology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität Zu Berlin, CCM, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany
| | - Moritz Gleitsmann
- Institute of Pathology, Philipps-University Marburg, University Hospital Marburg (UKGM), Marburg, Germany
| | - Moritz Jesinghaus
- Institute of Pathology, Philipps-University Marburg, University Hospital Marburg (UKGM), Marburg, Germany
| | - Wolfgang D Schmitt
- Institute of Pathology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität Zu Berlin, CCM, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany
| | - Hagen Kulbe
- Tumorbank Ovarian Cancer Network, Charité, Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität Zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, 10117, Berlin, Germany
- Department of Gynecology, European Competence Center for Ovarian Cancer, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität Zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, 10117, Berlin, Germany
| | - Christine Sers
- Institute of Pathology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität Zu Berlin, CCM, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Jalid Sehouli
- Tumorbank Ovarian Cancer Network, Charité, Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität Zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, 10117, Berlin, Germany
- Department of Gynecology, European Competence Center for Ovarian Cancer, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität Zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, 10117, Berlin, Germany
| | - Ioana Elena Braicu
- Tumorbank Ovarian Cancer Network, Charité, Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität Zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, 10117, Berlin, Germany
- Department of Gynecology, European Competence Center for Ovarian Cancer, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität Zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, 10117, Berlin, Germany
| | - Christina Westhoff
- Institute of Pathology, Philipps-University Marburg, University Hospital Marburg (UKGM), Marburg, Germany
| | - David Horst
- Institute of Pathology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität Zu Berlin, CCM, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany
| | - Carsten Denkert
- Institute of Pathology, Philipps-University Marburg, University Hospital Marburg (UKGM), Marburg, Germany
| | | | - Eliane T Taube
- Institute of Pathology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität Zu Berlin, CCM, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Huepenbecker SP, Wright JD, Downer MK, Incerti D, Luhn P, Dolado I, Bastiere-Truchot L, Lin YG, Chan JK, Meyer LA. Temporal Patterns and Adoption of Germline and Somatic BRCA Testing in Ovarian Cancer. Obstet Gynecol 2022; 140:758-767. [PMID: 36201776 PMCID: PMC9588544 DOI: 10.1097/aog.0000000000004958] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2022] [Accepted: 07/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To describe the testing rate, patient characteristics, temporal trends, timing, and results of germline and somatic BRCA testing in patients with ovarian cancer using real-world data. METHODS We included a cross-sectional subset of adult patients diagnosed with ovarian cancer between January 1, 2011, and November 30, 2018, who received frontline treatment and were followed for at least 1 year in a real-world database. The primary outcome was receipt of BRCA testing, classified by biosample source as germline (blood or saliva) or somatic (tissue). Lines of therapy (frontline, second line, third line) were derived based on dates of surgery and chemotherapy. Descriptive statistics were analyzed. RESULTS Among 2,557 patients, 72.2% (n=1,846) had at least one documented BRCA test. Among tested patients, 62.5% (n=1,154) had only germline testing, 10.6% (n=197) had only somatic testing, and 19.9% (n=368) had both. Most patients had testing before (9.7%, n=276) or during (48.6%, n=1,521) frontline therapy, with 17.6% (n=273) tested during second-line and 12.7% (n=129) tested during third-line therapy. Patients who received BRCA testing, compared with patients without testing, were younger (mean age 63 years vs 66 years, P <.001) and were more likely to be treated at an academic practice (10.4% vs 7.0%, P =.01), with differences by Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance score ( P <.001), stage of disease ( P <.001), histology ( P <.001), geography ( P <.001), and type of frontline therapy ( P <.001), but no differences based on race or ethnicity. The proportion of patients who received BRCA testing within 1 year of diagnosis increased from 24.6% of patients in 2011 to 75.6% of patients in 2018. CONCLUSION In a large cohort of patients with ovarian cancer, significant practice disparities existed in testing for actionable BRCA mutations. Despite increased testing over time, many patients did not receive testing, suggesting missed opportunities to identify patients appropriate for targeted therapy and genetic counseling.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jason D. Wright
- Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY
| | - Mary K. Downer
- Personalized Healthcare Data Science, Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA
| | - Devin Incerti
- Product Development Medical Affairs, F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Ltd., Basel, Switzerland
| | - Patricia Luhn
- Product Development Oncology, Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA
| | - Ignacio Dolado
- Product Development Medical Affairs, F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Ltd., Basel, Switzerland
| | | | - Yvonne G. Lin
- Product Development Oncology, Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA
| | - John K. Chan
- California Pacific Medical Center and Palo Alto Medical Foundation, Sutter Health, San Francisco, CA
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Bosch DE, Yeh MM, Salipante SJ, Jacobson A, Cohen SA, Konnick EQ, Paulson VA. Isolated MLH1 Loss by Immunohistochemistry Because of Benign Germline MLH1 Polymorphisms. JCO Precis Oncol 2022; 6:e2200227. [PMID: 36044719 PMCID: PMC9489174 DOI: 10.1200/po.22.00227] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Mismatch repair (MMR) immunohistochemistry (IHC) is frequently used to inform prognosis, select (immuno-)therapy, and identify patients for heritable cancer syndrome testing. However, false-negative and false-positive MMR IHC interpretations have been described.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dustin E Bosch
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA.,Department of Pathology, Roy J. and Lucille A. Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA
| | - Matthew M Yeh
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA
| | - Stephen J Salipante
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA
| | - Angela Jacobson
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA
| | - Stacey A Cohen
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA.,Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA
| | - Eric Q Konnick
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA
| | - Vera A Paulson
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Beyond BRCA1/2: Homologous Recombination Repair Genetic Profile in a Large Cohort of Apulian Ovarian Cancers. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14020365. [PMID: 35053526 PMCID: PMC8773795 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14020365] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2021] [Revised: 12/29/2021] [Accepted: 01/07/2022] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Ovarian cancer (OC) is the second most common gynecologic malignancy and the most common cause of death among women with gynecologic cancer. Despite significant improvements having been made over the past decades, OC remains one of the most challenging malignancies to treat. Targeted therapies, such as PARPi, have emerged as one of the most interesting treatments for OC, particularly in women with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations. or those with a dysfunctional homologous recombination repair pathway. The purpose of our study is to address the role of NGS-targeted resequencing in the clinical routine of OC, focusing not only on BRCA1/2 but also on the homologous recombination repair genetic profile. Abstract Background: Pathogenic variants in homologous recombination repair (HRR) genes other than BRCA1/2 have been associated with a high risk of ovarian cancer (OC). In current clinical practice, genetic testing is generally limited to BRCA1/2. Herein, we investigated the mutational status of both BRCA1/2 and 5 HRR genes in 69 unselected OC, evaluating the advantage of multigene panel testing in everyday clinical practice. Methods: We analyzed 69 epithelial OC samples using an NGS custom multigene panel of the 5 HRR pathways genes, beyond the genetic screening routine of BRCA1/2 testing. Results: Overall, 19 pathogenic variants (27.5%) were detected. The majority (21.7%) of patients displayed a deleterious mutation in BRCA1/2, whereas 5.8% harbored a pathogenic variant in one of the HRR genes. Additionally, there were 14 (20.3%) uncertain significant variants (VUS). The assessment of germline mutational status showed that a small number of variants (five) were not detected in the corresponding blood sample. Notably, we detected one BRIP1 and four BRCA1/2 deleterious variants in the low-grade serous and endometrioid histology OC, respectively. Conclusion: We demonstrate that using a multigene panel beyond BRCA1/2 improves the diagnostic yield in OC testing, and it could produce clinically relevant results.
Collapse
|
6
|
Vaidyanathan A, Kaklamani V. Understanding the Clinical Implications of Low Penetrant Genes and Breast Cancer Risk. Curr Treat Options Oncol 2021; 22:85. [PMID: 34424438 DOI: 10.1007/s11864-021-00887-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/30/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
OPINION STATEMENT Since the 2013 Supreme Court declaration, panel testing for hereditary cancer syndromes has evolved into the gold standard for oncology germline genetic testing. With the advent of next-generation sequencing, competitive pricing, and developing therapeutic options, panel testing is now well integrated into breast cancer management and surveillance. Although many established syndromes have well-defined cancer risks and management strategies, several breast cancer genes are currently classified as limited-evidence genes by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN). Follow-up for individuals with mutations in these genes is a point of contention due to conflicting information in the literature. The most recent NCCN guidelines have stratified management based on gene-specific cancer risks indicating that expanding data will allow for better recommendations as research progresses. The evolving management for these genes emphasizes the clinicians' need for evidence-based understanding of low penetrance breast cancer genes and their implications for patient care. This article reviews current literature for limited evidence genes, detailing cancer risks, association with triple-negative breast cancer, and recommendations for surveillance. A brief review of the challenges and future directions is outlined to discuss the evolving nature of cancer genetics and the exciting opportunities that can impact management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anusha Vaidyanathan
- UT Health Science Center San Antonio, 7979 Wurzbach Road, San Antonio, TX, 79229, USA.
| | - Virginia Kaklamani
- UT Health Science Center San Antonio, 7979 Wurzbach Road, San Antonio, TX, 79229, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Bekos C, Grimm C, Kranawetter M, Polterauer S, Oberndorfer F, Tan Y, Müllauer L, Singer CF. Reliability of Tumor Testing Compared to Germline Testing for Detecting BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutations in Patients with Epithelial Ovarian Cancer. J Pers Med 2021; 11:jpm11070593. [PMID: 34202525 PMCID: PMC8305542 DOI: 10.3390/jpm11070593] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2021] [Revised: 06/09/2021] [Accepted: 06/21/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: BRCA 1/2 mutation status has become one of the most important parameters for treatment decision in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). The aim of this study was to compare tumor DNA with blood DNA sequencing to evaluate the reliability of BRCA tumor testing results. Methods: Patients who were treated for EOC between 2003 and 2019 at the Medical University of Vienna and underwent both germline (gBRCA) and tumor (tBRCA) testing for BRCA mutations were identified. We calculated the concordance rate and further analyzed discordant cases. Results: Out of 140 patients with EOC, gBRCA mutation was found in 47 (33.6%) and tBRCA mutation in 53 (37.9%) patients. Tumor testing identified an additional 9/140 (6.4%) patients with somatic BRCA mutation and negative germline testing. The comparison of germline testing with tumor testing revealed a concordance rate of 93.5% and a negative predictive value of tumor testing of 96.0%. After BRCA variants of uncertain significance were included in the analysis, concordance rate decreased to 90.9%. Conclusion: Tumor testing identified the majority of pathogenic germline BRCA mutations but missed three (2.1%) patients. In contrast, nine (6.4%) patients harboring a somatic BRCA mutation would have been missed by gBRCA testing only.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christine Bekos
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, Gynecologic Cancer Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of General Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, A-1090 Vienna, Austria; (C.B.); (C.G.); (M.K.); (S.P.); (Y.T.); (C.F.S.)
| | - Christoph Grimm
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, Gynecologic Cancer Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of General Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, A-1090 Vienna, Austria; (C.B.); (C.G.); (M.K.); (S.P.); (Y.T.); (C.F.S.)
| | - Marlene Kranawetter
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, Gynecologic Cancer Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of General Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, A-1090 Vienna, Austria; (C.B.); (C.G.); (M.K.); (S.P.); (Y.T.); (C.F.S.)
| | - Stephan Polterauer
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, Gynecologic Cancer Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of General Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, A-1090 Vienna, Austria; (C.B.); (C.G.); (M.K.); (S.P.); (Y.T.); (C.F.S.)
| | | | - Yen Tan
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, Gynecologic Cancer Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of General Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, A-1090 Vienna, Austria; (C.B.); (C.G.); (M.K.); (S.P.); (Y.T.); (C.F.S.)
| | - Leonhard Müllauer
- Department of Pathology, Medical University of Vienna, A-1090 Vienna, Austria;
- Correspondence:
| | - Christian F. Singer
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, Gynecologic Cancer Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of General Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, A-1090 Vienna, Austria; (C.B.); (C.G.); (M.K.); (S.P.); (Y.T.); (C.F.S.)
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Lou SK, Grenier S, Care M, McCuaig J, Stockley TL, Clarke B, Ruff HM, Boerner SL. Validation of BRCA testing on cytologic samples of high-grade serous carcinoma. Cancer Cytopathol 2021; 129:907-913. [PMID: 34157791 DOI: 10.1002/cncy.22484] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2021] [Revised: 05/22/2021] [Accepted: 05/26/2021] [Indexed: 01/30/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Testing for BRCA1/2 gene alterations in patients with high-grade serous carcinoma (HGSC) is a critical determinant of treatment eligibility for poly(adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase inhibitors in addition to providing vital information for genetic counselling. Many patients present with effusions necessitating therapeutic drainage, and this makes cytologic specimens (CySs) the initial diagnostic material for HGSC, often before histologic sampling. Initiating somatic BRCA testing on a CyS allows the BRCA status to be determined sooner, and this affects clinical management. METHODS Retrospectively, 8 cases of formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) CySs of peritoneal or pleural fluid from patients with HGSC and known BRCA1/2 alterations previously established by the testing of FFPE surgical specimens (SpSs) underwent next-generation sequencing (NGS). Prospectively, 11 cases of peritoneal or pleural fluid from patients with HGSC but an unknown BRCA1/2 status underwent NGS with fresh, alcohol-fixed, and FFPE CySs, and they were compared with subsequent NGS on 4 SpSs. RESULTS CySs yielded high-quantity and high-quality DNA for NGS analysis when sufficient tumor cellularity was present. Fresh, alcohol-fixed, and FFPE CySs were all suitable for NGS and provided identical NGS results. SpS and CyS BRCA testing was concordant in 10 of 12 cases. The 2 discordant cases showed low tumor cellularity and quality in the CyS and the SpS, respectively. CONCLUSION Effusion CySs of HGSC are excellent sources for NGS testing for BRCA1/2 genetic alterations when sufficient tumor cellularity is present. Fresh, alcohol-fixed, and FFPE CySs are equivalent for NGS of BRCA1/2. NGS testing of HGSC CySs demonstrates good concordance with SpSs for the BRCA1/2 status.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Si Kei Lou
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Sylvie Grenier
- Laboratory Medicine Program, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Melanie Care
- Laboratory Medicine Program, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Department of Molecular Genetics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jeanna McCuaig
- Department of Molecular Genetics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Familial Cancer Clinic, Princess Margaret Hospital Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Lawrence S. Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Tracy L Stockley
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Laboratory Medicine Program, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Blaise Clarke
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Laboratory Medicine Program, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Heather M Ruff
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Laboratory Medicine Program, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Scott L Boerner
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Laboratory Medicine Program, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Yue H, Zhang X, Xia Y. Galangin Alleviates Tumor Progression and Metastasis in Intraperitoneal Ovarian Cancer Model via Inhibiting Janus Kinase 1/Signal Transduction and Activator of Transcription 3 Signaling. J BIOMATER TISS ENG 2021. [DOI: 10.1166/jbt.2021.2726] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
To investigate the impact of galangin on tumor progression and metastasis in intraperitoneal ovarian cancer model. Ovarian cancer cells were treated with DMSO or galectin, cell viability was detected by MTS or acid phosphatase assay, SKOV3 cells were transfected with STAT3 targeted
shRNA and the expression of signal transduction-related proteins in cells was analyzed by immunoblotting assay, the expression of IL-6, IL-2, INF-y was estimated by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay the peritoneal metastasis model of ovarian cancer was established using shSTAT3 transfected
or untransfected SKOV3 cells and treated with galangin or DMSO. Tumor mass, number of small tumor nodules and ascites volume were detected in the mouse model. Ovarian cancer-bearing mice treated with galangin showed a dramatic decreased tumor burden as demonstrated by the 25 times-reduced
total weight of small tumor nodules, 60%-reduced primary tumors, attenuated luciferase activity and completely blocked ascites production. Moreover, galangin inhibited cell viability in vitro in a concentration-dependent manner. Further, p-STAT3 was suppressed by galangin treatment
both in vivo and vitro. Galangin inhibited the expression of p-JAK1, the upstream signaling of p-STAT3 and IL-6 in the downstream. Meanwhile, knockdown of STAT3 by shSTAT3 transfection mimicked the therapeutic effects of galangin in vivo and vitro. Galangin supresses IL-6 secretion,
peritoneal metastasis and ascites production by inhibiting JAK1/STAT3 signaling.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hua Yue
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Xidian Group Hospital, Xian, Shaanxi, 710000, China
| | - Xiuling Zhang
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Xidian Group Hospital, Xian, Shaanxi, 710000, China
| | - Yali Xia
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Xianyang Hospital, Yan’an University, Xianyang, Shaanxi, 712000, China
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Callens C, Vaur D, Soubeyran I, Rouleau E, Just PA, Guillerm E, Golmard L, Goardon N, Sevenet N, Cabaret O, Harter P, Gonzalez-Martin A, Fujiwara K, Cecere SC, Colombo N, Marth C, Vergote I, Maenpaa J, Pujade-Lauraine E, Ray-Coquard I. Concordance Between Tumor and Germline BRCA Status in High-Grade Ovarian Carcinoma Patients in the Phase III PAOLA-1/ENGOT-ov25 Trial. J Natl Cancer Inst 2020; 113:917-923. [PMID: 33372675 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djaa193] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2020] [Revised: 09/16/2020] [Accepted: 11/30/2020] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND PAOLA1 is a phase III study assessing olaparib maintenance therapy in advanced high-grade ovarian carcinoma patients responding to first-line platinum-taxane-based chemotherapy plus bevacizumab as standard of care. Randomization was stratified by treatment outcome and tumor BRCA1/2 status (tBRCA) at screening. METHODS tBRCA was tested on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tumor blocks on 5 French platforms using 2 next-generation sequencing methods based either on hybrid capture or amplicon technology. One of the exploratory objectives was to assess the concordance between germline (gBRCA) and tBRCA testing in French patients. gBRCA testing was performed on blood samples on the same platforms. RESULTS From May 2015 to July 2017, tBRCA tests were performed for 1176 screened patients. Only 52 (4.4%) tumor samples were noncontributive. The median interval between reception of the tumor sample and availability of the tBRCA status result was 37 days (range = 8-260). A pathogenic variant was reported in 27.1% tumor samples (319 of 1176 screened patients). tBRCA and gBRCA testing were performed for 451 French patients with negative results for both tests in 306 patients (67.8%) and positive results for both tests in 85 patients (18.8%). Only 1 large genomic rearrangement of BRCA1 was detected, exclusively in the blood sample. Interestingly, tBRCA testing revealed 6.4% of pathogenic variant (29 of 451) not detected by gBRCA testing. CONCLUSIONS tBRCA testing is an appropriate tool with an acceptable turnaround time for clinical practice and a low failure rate, ensuring reliable identification of patients likely to benefit from poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Céline Callens
- Genetics Department, Institut Curie and Paris Sciences Lettres University, Paris, France
| | - Dominique Vaur
- Laboratoire de Biologie Clinique et Oncologique, Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France
| | | | - Etienne Rouleau
- Biopathology Department, Institut Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | - Pierre-Alexandre Just
- Department of Pathological Anatomy and Cytology, Hôpital Cochin, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France, Genetics Department, Hôpital Universitaire Pitié-Salpétrière, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Erell Guillerm
- Department of Pathological Anatomy and Cytology, Hôpital Cochin, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France, Genetics Department, Hôpital Universitaire Pitié-Salpétrière, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Lisa Golmard
- Genetics Department, Institut Curie and Paris Sciences Lettres University, Paris, France
| | - Nicolas Goardon
- Laboratoire de Biologie Clinique et Oncologique, Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France
| | - Nicolas Sevenet
- Biopathology Department, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France
| | - Odile Cabaret
- Biopathology Department, Institut Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | - Philipp Harter
- Obstetric and Gynecologic Department, Kliniken Essen Mitte, Essen, AGO De, Germany
| | - Antonio Gonzalez-Martin
- Oncology Department, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Madrid, formerly MD Anderson Cancer Center, Madrid, GEICO, Spain
| | - Keiichi Fujiwara
- Gynecologic Oncologic Department, Saitama Medical University, Saitama, GOTIC, Japan
| | - Sabrina Chiara Cecere
- Department of Urology and Gynecology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione G. Pascale, Napoli, Mito Italy
| | - Nicoletta Colombo
- Gynecology Oncology Division, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Mango Italy
| | - Christian Marth
- Obstetric and Gynecologic Department, Medical University of Innsbruck, AGO Au, Austria
| | - Ignace Vergote
- Gynecologic Oncologic Department, University Hospital Leuven, Department of Gynecologic oncology, Leuven Cancer Institute, Leuven, BGOG, Belgium
| | - Johanna Maenpaa
- Gynecologic Oncologic Department, Tampere University and University Hospital Cancer Centre, Tampere, NSGO, Finland
| | | | - Isabelle Ray-Coquard
- Medical Oncology Department, Centre Léon Bérard and University, Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, GINECO, France
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Care M, McCuaig J, Clarke B, Grenier S, Kim RH, Rouzbahman M, Stickle N, Bernardini M, Stockley TL. Tumor and germline next generation sequencing in high grade serous cancer: experience from a large population-based testing program. Mol Oncol 2020; 15:80-90. [PMID: 33030818 PMCID: PMC7782089 DOI: 10.1002/1878-0261.12817] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2020] [Revised: 09/18/2020] [Accepted: 10/05/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of somatic and germline pathogenic variants (PVs) in high‐grade serous cancer (HGSC) and to demonstrate the technical feasibility and effectiveness of a large‐scale, population‐based tumor testing program. It involved a retrospective review of genetic test results in 600 consecutive HGSC tumor samples and a subsequent comparison of germline and tumor results in a subset of 200 individuals. Tumor testing was successful in 95% of samples (570/600) with at least one BRCA1/2 PV identified in 16% (93/570) of cases. Among the 200 paired cases, BRCA1/2 PVs were detected in 38 tumors (19%); 58% were somatic (22/38); and 42% were germline (16/38). There was 100% concordance between germline and tumor test results. This is the largest series of BRCA1/2 testing in HGSC (tumor‐only and paired cohorts), reported to date, and our data show that an effectively designed and validated population‐based tumor testing program can be used to determine both treatment eligibility and hereditary cancer risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melanie Care
- Laboratory Medicine Program, Division of Clinical Laboratory Genetics, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada.,Department of Molecular Genetics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Jeanna McCuaig
- Department of Molecular Genetics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.,Familial Cancer Clinic, Princess Margaret Hospital Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada.,Lawrence S. Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Blaise Clarke
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Sylvie Grenier
- Laboratory Medicine Program, Division of Clinical Laboratory Genetics, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada.,Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Raymond H Kim
- Familial Cancer Clinic, Princess Margaret Hospital Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada.,Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Marjan Rouzbahman
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Natalie Stickle
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Marcus Bernardini
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Princess Margaret Hospital Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - Tracy L Stockley
- Laboratory Medicine Program, Division of Clinical Laboratory Genetics, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada.,Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Suszynska M, Kozlowski P. Summary of BARD1 Mutations and Precise Estimation of Breast and Ovarian Cancer Risks Associated with the Mutations. Genes (Basel) 2020; 11:genes11070798. [PMID: 32679805 PMCID: PMC7397132 DOI: 10.3390/genes11070798] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2020] [Revised: 07/13/2020] [Accepted: 07/14/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Over the last two decades, numerous BARD1 mutations/pathogenic variants (PVs) have been found in patients with breast cancer (BC) and ovarian cancer (OC). However, their role in BC and OC susceptibility remains controversial, and strong evidence-based guidelines for carriers are not yet available. Herein, we present a comprehensive catalog of BARD1 PVs identified in large cumulative cohorts of ~48,700 BC and ~20,800 OC cases (retrieved from 123 studies examining the whole coding sequence of BARD1). Using these resources, we compared the frequency of BARD1 PVs in the cases and ~134,100 controls from the gnomAD database and estimated the effect of the BARD1 PVs on BC and OC risks. The analysis revealed that BARD1 is a BC moderate-risk gene (odds ratio (OR) = 2.90, 95% CIs:2.25–3.75, p < 0.0001) but not an OC risk gene (OR = 1.36, 95% CIs:0.87–2.11, p = 0.1733). In addition, the BARD1 mutational spectrum outlined in this study allowed us to determine recurrent PVs and evaluate the variant-specific risk for the most frequent PVs. In conclusion, these precise estimates improve the understanding of the role of BARD1 PVs in BC and OC predisposition and support the need for BARD1 diagnostic testing in BC patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Piotr Kozlowski
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +48-618-528-503 (ext. 261); Fax: +48-618-520-532
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Moore KN, Zorn KK. Germline and Somatic Testing in Ovarian Cancer: Shifting Sands of Recommendations. Gynecol Oncol 2020; 156:515-516. [PMID: 32127132 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.02.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
|