Is the risk of substantial LVSI in stage I endometrial cancer similar to PORTEC in the North American population? - A single-institution study

Practical guidance for assessing and reporting lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI) in endometrial carcinoma

Lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI) is an important prognostic parameter in endometrial carcinoma (EC) and has gained increasing interest in recent years due to an expanding body of evidence of its independent prognostic value, especially when the presence of LVSI is quantified. A key strength of LVSI as a prognostic factor is that it can be detected on routine microscopic examination, without ancillary tests, and thus can be used in low-resource settings. A weakness, however, is the lack of uniformly applied criteria for assessment and quantification of LVSI, resulting in interobserver variation in diagnosis. This is confounded by artefacts and other morphological features that may mimic LVSI (commonly referred to as pseudo-LVSI). Despite these issues, multiple studies have shown that LVSI is strongly associated with lymph node (LN) metastasis and is an independent risk factor for LN recurrence and distant metastasis. Consequently, the presence of substantial/extensive LVSI has become an important consideration in formulating adjuvant treatment recommendations in patients with EC, and this has been incorporated in the recent International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) 2023 staging system. Herein, we review the current literature on LVSI in EC and discuss its role as a prognostic marker, the reproducibility of LVSI assessment and distinction between LVSI and its mimics. We provide illustrations of key diagnostic features and discuss the two-tiered (none/focal versus substantial) system of LVSI classification. This work is intended to provide guidance to practising pathologists and unify the approach towards LVSI assessment in EC.

Prognostic value of three-tiered scoring system for lymph-vascular space invasion in endometrial cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the impact of lymph-vascular space invasion (LVSI) status on the prognosis of endometrial cancer (EC) according to a three-tiered scoring system for LVSI.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP), and Clinical Trials.gov were searched from inception to September 1st, 2023. The analysis was conducted using STATA 16.0.

RESULTS

A total of 9 studies with 4456 EC patients were included in the analysis. No LVSI was found in 72% of EC patients (95% CI 0.65-0.79), while focal and substantial LVSI were present in 16% (95% CI 0.11-0.21) and 13% (95% CI 0.08-018) of patients, respectively. Compared to the no LVSI group, the focal and substantial LVSI groups had poorer overall survival (for focal LVSI: HR 1.33, 95% CI 1.02-1.74; for substantial LVSI: HR 2.51, 95% CI 1.61-3.90), poorer disease-free survival (for substantial LVSI: HR 2.86, 95% CI 1.21-6.77), and an increased risk of recurrence, including pelvic recurrence (for focal LVSI: HR 2.05, 95% CI 1.03-4.07; for substantial LVSI: HR 6.06, 95% CI 3.31-11.08), distant recurrence (for focal LVSI: HR 2.04, 95% CI 1.42-2.92; for substantial LVSI: HR 3.36, 95% CI 2.35-4.793), and lymph node involvement (for focal LVSI: OR 3.52, 95% CI 1.339.34; for substantial LVSI: OR 5.42, 95% CI 2.78-10.58). Substantial LVSI was more prone to pelvic recurrence (HR 1.82, 95% CI 1.05-3.15) and distant recurrence (HR 2.21, 95% CI 1.48-3.28) than focal LVSI.

CONCLUSIONS

EC patients with focal and substantial LVSI had poorer survival, recurrence, and a higher incidence of lymph node metastasis than patients without LVSI. The substantial LVSI group was associated with even worse prognosis than the focal LVSI group. The three-tiered LVSI scoring system might effectively predict the prognosis of EC and guide clinical decision-making.

PROTOCOL REGISTRATION

CRD 42023451793.

Differentiation of survival outcomes by anatomic involvement and histology with the revised 2023 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics staging system for endometrial cancer

OBJECTIVES

The International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) staging system for endometrial cancer underwent revision in 2023, incorporating histology, lymphovascular space invasion, and molecular classification. Herein, we compare overall survival (OS) outcomes by anatomic and histologic involvement for patients staged by the 2009 system versus 2023 system.

METHODS

The National Cancer Database (NCDB) was queried for patients with newly-diagnosed uterine adenocarcinoma from 2004 to 2015, with follow-up data extending through 2020. Stage was determined by both the 2009 and 2023 FIGO staging systems. Kaplan-Meier estimators and Cox proportional hazards models were used for survival analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 134,677 patients were analyzed. Per 2023 classification, patients with stage I disease decreased from 96,161 to 70,101 (-27.1%, p < 0.01), while stage II disease increased from 9295 to 36,294 (+390.5%, p < 0.01). Greatest OS change was observed for 2023 stage IA3 patients (low-risk, synchronous endometrial and ovarian tumors with a clonal relationship), whose 10-year OS was 73.4%, compared to 52.6% for 2009 stage IIIA disease. Ten-year OS for 2023 stage IIIB2 (pelvic peritoneal involvement), previously 2009 stage IVB, was 49.4%, compared to 18.7% for 2009 stage IVB patients. Akaike information criterion, Bayesian information criterion, and Harrel's concordance index were used to evaluate OS prognostication of each staging system across all stages, with likelihood ratio favoring the 2023 system (p = 0.020).

CONCLUSIONS

With FIGO's 2023 endometrial cancer anatomic and histologic staging system, stage migration is greatest in early-stage disease. New staging groups may offer more precise prognostication. These changes may affect future management.

Recurrence Risk Stratification for Women With FIGO Stage I Uterine Endometrioid Carcinoma Who Underwent Surgical Lymph Node Evaluation

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to estimate the recurrence risk based on the number of prognostic factors for patients with stage I uterine endometrioid carcinoma (EC) who underwent surgical lymph node evaluation (SLNE) and were managed with observation.

METHODS

We queried our database for women with FIGO-2009 stage I EC who underwent surgical staging including SLNE. Multivariate analysis with stepwise model selection was used to determine independent risk factors for 5-year recurrence-free survival (RFS). Study groups based on risk factors were compared for RFS, disease-specific survival, and overall survival.

RESULTS

A total of 706 patients were identified: median age was 60 years (range, 30 to 93 y) and median follow-up was 120 months. Median number of examined lymph nodes was 8 (range, 1 to 66). 91% were stage IA, 75% had grade 1 and lymphovascular space invasion was detected in 6%. Independent predictors of 5-year RFS included age 60 years and above ( P =0.038), grade 2 ( P =0.003), and grade 3 ( P <0.001) versus grade 1. Five-year RFS for group 0 (age less than 60 y and grade 1) was 98% versus 92% for group 1 (either: age 60 y and older or grade 2/3) versus 84% for group 2 (both: age 60 y and above and grade 2/3), respectively ( P <0.001). Five-year disease-specific survival was 100% versus 98% versus 95%, ( P =0.012) and 5-year overall survival was 98% versus 90% versus 81%, for groups 0, 1, and 2, respectively ( P <0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with stage I EC who received SLNE and no adjuvant therapy, only age 60 years and above and high tumor grade were independent predictors of recurrence and can be used to quantify individualized recurrence risk, whereas lymphovascular space invasion was not an independent prognostic factor in this cohort.

[Molecular classification of endometrial carcinoma-a short summary for clinical use]

BACKGROUND

Histopathological examination is still the backbone for the diagnosis and treatment decision making in endometrial carcinoma (EC). The binary classification of EC into type 1 (mostly endometrioid) and type 2 (mostly serous), although still helpful, showed overlapping clinical, morphological and molecular features and was not very prognostic discriminatory for all subtypes of EC.

METHODS

Analysing the most recent studies dealing with the molecular classification of EC and the recommendations of the German S3-guidelines for EC.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

Based on the comprehensive molecular study of The Cancer Genome Atlas Project (TCGA) four distinct molecular subtypes have been identified: EC with POLE mutation (POLEmut), with loss of mismatch repair proteins (MMR deficiency; dMMR), or with TP53 mutation (p53mut) and without any of these alterations, termed NSMP (no specific molecular profile). The molecular classification of EC presents a morphomolecular approach, based on histopathological evaluation (tumor diagnosis, subtyping, grading), immunohistochemistry (MMR, p53) and molecular analyses for POLE. The incorporation of this molecular classification is recommended for clinical use by the World Health Organisation (WHO) as well as many national guidelines and international societies. Due to the heterogeneity of NSMP-EC, which is the largest molecular group, additional research is indicated to further characterise these tumors.

Is Substantial Lymphovascular Space Invasion Prognostic in Patients With Pathologically Lymph Node-Negative Endometrial Cancer?

PURPOSE

Lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI) predicts for higher rates of recurrence and increased mortality in endometrial cancer. Using 3-tier LVSI scoring, a PORTEC-1 and -2 trials analysis demonstrated that substantial LVSI was associated with worse locoregional (LR-DFS) and distant metastasis disease-free survival (DM-DFS), and these patients possibly benefited from external beam radiation therapy (EBRT). Furthermore, LVSI is a predictor for lymph node (LN) involvement, but the significance of substantial LVSI is unknown in patients with a pathologically negative LN assessment. We aimed to evaluate clinical outcomes of these patients in relation to the 3-tier LVSI scoring system.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We performed a single-institutional retrospective review of patients with stage I endometrioid-type endometrial cancer who underwent surgical staging with pathologically negative LN evaluation from 2017 to 2019 with 3-tier LVSI scoring (none, focal, or substantial). Clinical outcomes (LR-DFS, DM-DFS, and overall survival) were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

A total of 335 patients with pathologically LN-negative stage I endometrioid-type endometrial carcinoma were identified. Substantial LVSI was present in 17.6% of patients; 39.7% of patients received adjuvant vaginal brachytherapy and 6.9% of patients received EBRT. Adjuvant radiation treatment varied by LVSI status. In patients with focal LVSI, 81.0% received vaginal brachytherapy. Among patients with substantial LVSI, 57.9% received vaginal brachytherapy alone, and 31.6% of patients received EBRT. The 2-year LR-DFS rates were 92.5%, 98.0%, and 91.4% for no LVSI, focal LVSI, and substantial LVSI, respectively. The 2-year DM-DFS rates were 95.5%, 93.3%, and 93.8% for no LVSI, focal LVSI, and substantial LVSI, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

In our institutional study, patients with pathologically LN-negative stage I endometrial cancer with substantial LVSI had similar rates of LR-DFS and DM-DFS compared with patients with none or focal LVSI. These findings highlight the need for multi-institutional studies to validate the prognostic value of substantial LVSI in this patient population.

Extensive versus focal lymphovascular invasion in squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix: A comprehensive international, multicenter, retrospective clinicopathologic study

OBJECTIVE

We evaluated clinicopathologic parameters of patients with cervical squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) who were treated with initial surgical management and assessed their relation to survival outcomes. Specifically, we evaluated the relation between extent of lymphovascular invasion (LVI) and survival outcomes.

METHODS

All available tumor slides from patients with initially surgically treated cervical SCC were collected from 10 institutions and retrospectively analyzed. Standard clinicopathological parameters, tumor stroma, and extent of LVI were assessed (focal: <5 spaces, extensive: ≥5 spaces). PFS and OS were evaluated using Kaplan-Meier methodology. Univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were created to determine prognostic survival-related risk factors.

RESULTS

A total of 670 tumor samples were included in the analysis. Median age at diagnosis was 47 years (IQR: 38-60), 457 patients (72%) had a 2018 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage I tumor, and 155 tumors (28%) were flat and/or ulcerated. There were 303 nonkeratinizing tumors (51%), 237 keratinizing tumors (40%), and 356 histologic grade 2 tumors (61%). Quantifiable LVI was present in 321 cases (51%; 23% focal and 33% extensive). On multivariable analysis for PFS, extensive and focal LVI had worse outcomes compared to negative LVI (HR: 2.38 [95% CI: 1.26-4.47] and HR: 1.54 [95% CI: 0.76-3.11], respectively; P = 0.02). The difference did not reach statistical significance for OS.

CONCLUSION

Presence of LVI is a prognostic marker for patients with cervical SCC. Quantification (extensive vs. focal vs. negative) of LVI may be an important biomarker for oncologic outcome.

FIGO staging of endometrial cancer: 2023

INTRODUCTION

Many advances in the understanding of the pathologic and molecular features of endometrial cancer have occurred since the FIGO staging was last updated in 2009. Substantially more outcome and biological behavior data are now available regarding the several histological types. Molecular and genetic findings have accelerated since the publication of The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) data and provide improved clarity on the diverse biological nature of this collection of endometrial cancers and their differing prognostic outcomes. The goals of the new staging system are to better define these prognostic groups and create substages that indicate more appropriate surgical, radiation, and systemic therapies.

METHODS

The FIGO Women's Cancer Committee appointed a Subcommittee on Endometrial Cancer Staging in October 2021, represented by the authors. Since then, the committee members have met frequently and reviewed new and established evidence on the treatment, prognosis, and survival of endometrial cancer. Based on these data, opportunities for improvements in the categorization and stratification of these factors were identified in each of the four stages. Data and analyses from the molecular and histological classifications performed and published in the recently developed ESGO/ESTRO/ESP guidelines were used as a template for adding the new subclassifications to the proposed molecular and histological staging system.

RESULTS

Based on the existing evidence, the substages were defined as follows: Stage I (IA1): non-aggressive histological type of endometrial carcinoma limited to a polyp or confined to the endometrium; (IA2) non-aggressive histological types of endometrium involving less than 50% of the myometrium with no or focal lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI) as defined by WHO criteria; (IA3) low-grade endometrioid carcinomas limited to the uterus with simultaneous low-grade endometrioid ovarian involvement; (IB) non-aggressive histological types involving 50% or more of the myometrium with no LVSI or focal LVSI; (IC) aggressive histological types, i.e. serous, high-grade endometrioid, clear cell, carcinosarcomas, undifferentiated, mixed, and other unusual types without any myometrial invasion. Stage II (IIA): non-aggressive histological types that infiltrate the cervical stroma; (IIB) non-aggressive histological types that have substantial LVSI; or (IIC) aggressive histological types with any myometrial invasion. Stage III (IIIA): differentiating between adnexal versus uterine serosa infiltration; (IIIB) infiltration of vagina/parametria and pelvic peritoneal metastasis; and (IIIC) refinements for lymph node metastasis to pelvic and para-aortic lymph nodes, including micrometastasis and macrometastasis. Stage IV (IVA): locally advanced disease infiltrating the bladder or rectal mucosa; (IVB) extrapelvic peritoneal metastasis; and (IVC) distant metastasis. The performance of complete molecular classification (POLEmut, MMRd, NSMP, p53abn) is encouraged in all endometrial cancers. If the molecular subtype is known, this is recorded in the FIGO stage by the addition of "m" for molecular classification, and a subscript indicating the specific molecular subtype. When molecular classification reveals p53abn or POLEmut status in Stages I and II, this results in upstaging or downstaging of the disease (IICmp53abn or IAmPOLEmut).

SUMMARY

The updated 2023 staging of endometrial cancer includes the various histological types, tumor patterns, and molecular classification to better reflect the improved understanding of the complex nature of the several types of endometrial carcinoma and their underlying biologic behavior. The changes incorporated in the 2023 staging system should provide a more evidence-based context for treatment recommendations and for the more refined future collection of outcome and survival data.

FIGO staging of endometrial cancer: 2023

INTRODUCTION

Many advances in the understanding of the pathologic and molecular features of endometrial cancer have occurred since the FIGO staging was last updated in 2009. Substantially more outcome and biological behavior data are now available regarding the several histological types. Molecular and genetic findings have accelerated since the publication of The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) data and provide improved clarity on the diverse biological nature of this collection of endometrial cancers and their differing prognostic outcomes. The goals of the new staging system are to better define these prognostic groups and create substages that indicate more appropriate surgical, radiation, and systemic therapies.

METHODS

The FIGO Women's Cancer Committee appointed a Subcommittee on Endometrial Cancer Staging in October 2021, represented by the authors. Since then, the committee members have met frequently and reviewed new and established evidence on the treatment, prognosis, and survival of endometrial cancer. Based on these data, opportunities for improvements in the categorization and stratification of these factors were identified in each of the four stages. Data and analyses from the molecular and histological classifications performed and published in the recently developed ESGO/ESTRO/ESP guidelines were used as a template for adding the new subclassifications to the proposed molecular and histological staging system.

RESULTS

Based on the existing evidence, the substages were defined as follows: Stage I (IA1): non-aggressive histological type of endometrial carcinoma limited to a polyp or confined to the endometrium; (IA2) non-aggressive histological types of endometrium involving less than 50% of the myometrium with no or focal lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI) as defined by WHO criteria; (IA3) low-grade endometrioid carcinomas limited to the uterus with simultaneous low-grade endometrioid ovarian involvement; (IB) non-aggressive histological types involving 50% or more of the myometrium with no LVSI or focal LVSI; (IC) aggressive histological types, i.e. serous, high-grade endometrioid, clear cell, carcinosarcomas, undifferentiated, mixed, and other unusual types without any myometrial invasion. Stage II (IIA): non-aggressive histological types that infiltrate the cervical stroma; (IIB) non-aggressive histological types that have substantial LVSI; or (IIC) aggressive histological types with any myometrial invasion. Stage III (IIIA): differentiating between adnexal versus uterine serosa infiltration; (IIIB) infiltration of vagina/parametria and pelvic peritoneal metastasis; and (IIIC) refinements for lymph node metastasis to pelvic and para-aortic lymph nodes, including micrometastasis and macrometastasis. Stage IV (IVA): locally advanced disease infiltrating the bladder or rectal mucosa; (IVB) extrapelvic peritoneal metastasis; and (IVC) distant metastasis. The performance of complete molecular classification (POLEmut, MMRd, NSMP, p53abn) is encouraged in all endometrial cancers. If the molecular subtype is known, this is recorded in the FIGO stage by the addition of "m" for molecular classification, and a subscript indicating the specific molecular subtype. When molecular classification reveals p53abn or POLEmut status in Stages I and II, this results in upstaging or downstaging of the disease (IICmp53abn or IAmPOLEmut ).

SUMMARY

The updated 2023 staging of endometrial cancer includes the various histological types, tumor patterns, and molecular classification to better reflect the improved understanding of the complex nature of the several types of endometrial carcinoma and their underlying biologic behavior. The changes incorporated in the 2023 staging system should provide a more evidence-based context for treatment recommendations and for the more refined future collection of outcome and survival data.

Influence of uterine manipulator use on the incidence of lymphovascular propagation in the treatment of endometrial cancer

BACKGROUND

Endometrial cancers are among the epithelial malignancies of the lining of the uterine cavity. The invasion of carcinoma into the lymphovascular space (LVSI) is considered a risk factor for the course of the disease.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We evaluated 170 female patients. Our primary objective was to find any difference in the incidence of LVSI in female patients treated with and without an intrauterine manipulator. In addition, we analyzed the effect of the type of intrauterine manipulator used on the incidence of LVSI, tumor grading, myometrial invasion, and the method of obtaining primary histology with regard to the incidence of LVSI.

RESULTS

Using a manipulator during surgery was not associated with LVSI (with a manipulator vs. without, 11.5 vs. 21.7%; OR 1.8; 95% CI 0.73-4.39; p = 0.199). However, the method used to obtain the primary histology had a statistically significant effect on the incidence of LVSI in our set (p-value = 0.011).

CONCLUSIONS

In our study, we did not confirm the effect of a uterine manipulator on the possible increase of LVSI positive cases. The secondary analysis indicated a higher incidence of LVSI in the female patients diagnosed with curettage than in those who underwent hysteroscopy. Trail registration: Trail is registered in ClicincalTrails.gov with identifier: NCT05261165.

Data Set for the Reporting of Endometrial Cancer: Recommendations From the International Collaboration on Cancer Reporting (ICCR)

Endometrial cancer is one of the most common cancers among women. The International Collaboration on Cancer Reporting (ICCR) developed a standardized endometrial cancer data set in 2011, which provided detailed recommendations for the reporting of resection specimens of these neoplasms. A new data set has been developed, which incorporates the updated 2020 World Health Organization Classification of Female Genital Tumors, the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) molecular classification of endometrial cancers, and other major advances in endometrial cancer reporting, all of which necessitated a major revision of the data set. This updated data set has been produced by a panel of expert pathologists and an expert clinician and has been subject to international open consultation. The data set includes core elements which are unanimously agreed upon as essential for cancer diagnosis, clinical management, staging, or prognosis and noncore elements which are clinically important, but not essential. Explanatory notes are provided for each element. Adoption of this updated data set will result in improvements in endometrial cancer patient care.

Is Substantial Lymphovascular Space Invasion Prognostic for Clinical Outcomes in Type II Endometrial Cancer?

AIMS

Substantial lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI) compared with none or focal LVSI is predictive of lymph node involvement and worse clinical outcomes in endometrioid-type endometrial carcinoma. We aimed to quantify the incidence of substantial LVSI in type II (clear cell and serous) endometrial cancer and correlate the extent of LVSI with clinical outcomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective review was conducted on type II endometrial cancer patients who underwent surgical management from July 2017 to December 2019 using the three-tier LVSI scoring system. Binary logistic regression and Cox regression were used to analyse predictors of lymph node involvement or survival outcomes, respectively. The Kaplan-Meier method and Log-rank test were used to analyse differences in locoregional disease-free survival (LR-DFS), distant metastasis disease-free survival (DM-DFS) and overall survival between patients with substantial versus none/focal LVSI.

RESULTS

In 79 patients with type II endometrial carcinoma, no LVSI, focal LVSI and substantial LVSI was present in 48.1%, 15.2% and 36.7% of patients, respectively. Lymph nodes were involved in 0.0% with no LVSI, 20.0% with focal LVSI and 60.0% with substantial LVSI (P < 0.001). The median follow-up was 22.2 months. In patients with none/focal versus substantial LVSI, the 2-year LR-DFS and DM-DFS rates were 91.5% versus 71.4% (P = 0.01) and 90.2% versus 63.8% (P = 0.005), respectively. On univariate analysis, myometrial invasion ≥50%, tumour size ≥3.6 cm, substantial versus none/focal LVSI, lymph node involvement and omission of adjuvant radiotherapy were significant predictors for worse LR-DFS and DM-DFS (P < 0.05).

DISCUSSION

Substantial LVSI has a high incidence in type II pathology at our institution and predicts for lymph node involvement and worse clinical outcomes.

Association of Myometrial Invasion With Lymphovascular Space Invasion, Lymph Node Metastasis, Recurrence, and Overall Survival in Endometrial Cancer: A Meta-Analysis of 79 Studies With 68,870 Patients

Background

Myometrial invasion has been demonstrated to correlate to clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis in endometrial cancer. However, not all the studies have the consistent results and no meta-analysis has investigated the association of myometrial invasion with lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI), lymph node metastasis (LNM), recurrence, and overall survival (OS). Therefore, a meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the relationship between myometrial invasion and clinicopathological characteristics or overall survival in endometrial cancer.

Materials and Methods

A search of Pubmed, Embase, and Web of Science was carried out to collect relevant studies from their inception until June 30, 2021. The quality of each included study was evaluated using Newcastle–Ottawa scale (NOS) scale. Review Manager version 5.4 was employed to conduct the meta-analysis.

Results

A total of 79 articles with 68,870 endometrial cancer patients were eligible including 9 articles for LVSI, 29 articles for LNM, 8 for recurrence, and 37 for OS in this meta-analysis. Myometrial invasion was associated with LVSI (RR 3.07; 95% CI 2.17–4.35; p < 0.00001), lymph node metastasis (LNM) (RR 4.45; 95% CI 3.29–6.01; p < 0.00001), and recurrence (RR 2.06; 95% CI 1.58–2.69; p < 0.00001). Deep myometrial invasion was also significantly related with poor OS via meta-synthesis of HRs in both univariate survival (HR 3.36, 95% CI 2.35–4.79, p < 0.00001) and multivariate survival (HR 2.00, 95% CI 1.59–2.53, p < 0.00001). Funnel plot suggested that there was no significant publication bias in this study.

Conclusion

Deep myometrial invasion correlated to positive LVSI, positive LNM, cancer recurrence, and poor OS for endometrial cancer patients, indicating that myometrial invasion was a useful evaluation criterion to associate with clinical outcomes and prognosis of endometrial cancer since depth of myometrial invasion can be assessed before surgery. The large scale and comprehensive meta-analysis suggested that we should pay more attention to myometrial invasion in clinical practice, and its underlying mechanism also deserves further investigation.

Substantial Lymphovascular Space Invasion Is an Adverse Prognostic Factor in High-risk Endometrial Cancer

Approximately 15% of patients with endometrial cancer present with high-risk disease (HREC). Moreover, assessing the extent of lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI) may provide prognostic insight among patients with HREC. The aim of this study was to determine whether the extent of LVSI can serve as a prognostic factor in HREC. All cases of ESMO-ESGO-ESTRO 2016 classified HREC in the Danish Gynecological Cancer Database (DGCD) diagnosed from 2005 to 2012 were reviewed for the presence and extent of LVSI (categorized using a 3-tiered definition). We used the Kaplan-Meier analysis to calculate actuarial survival rates, both adjusted and unadjusted Cox regression analyses were used to calculate the proportional hazard ratio (HR). A total of 376 patients were included in our analysis. Among 305 patients with stage I/II HREC, 8.2% and 6.2% had focal or substantial LVSI, respectively, compared with 12.7% and 38.0% of 71 patients with stage III/IV HREC, respectively. Moreover, the estimated 5-yr recurrence-free survival rate was significantly lower among patients with substantial LVSI compared with patients with no LVSI for both stage I/II (HR: 2.8; P=0.011) and stage III/IV (HR: 2.9; P=0.003) patients. Similarly, overall survival was significantly lower among patients with substantial LVSI for both stage I/II (HR: 3.1; P<0.001) and stage III/IV (HR: 3.2; P=0.020) patients. In patients with HREC, substantial LVSI is an independent adverse prognostic factor for lymph node and distant metastases, leading to reduced survival. Thus, the extent of LVSI should be incorporated into routine pathology reports in order to guide the appropriate choice of adjuvant treatment.

Substantial lymphovascular space invasion predicts worse outcomes in early-stage endometrioid endometrial cancer

INTRODUCTION

Substantial as opposed to focal or no lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI) is proposed as an independent adverse prognostic factor in patients with early-stage endometrioid endometrial cancer (EEC). We reviewed outcomes of patients treated with adjuvant vaginal brachytherapy (VB) alone in a single institution, stratified by LVSI extent.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Retrospective review identified Stage I-II EEC patients receiving VB alone from 2010 to 2017. Extent of LVSI was reported as none, focal, or substantial. Kaplan-Meier estimates and Log-Rank test were used to determine significance between variables. Cox proportional hazards model was used for multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

In total, 325 patients were identified with a median follow-up of 35 (23-48) months. LVSI was found in 112 patients with extent reported in 78, 45 (58%) had focal, and 33 (42%) substantial LVSI. Estimated disease-free survival for those with substantial LVSI was 73 (57-94)%, focal LVSI 89 (79-100)%, and no LVSI 94 (90-98)% at 48 months (p = 0.012). On multivariate analyses substantial LVSI was the only risk factor predictive of pelvic [HR substantial vs no: 7.2 (1.0-51.6); p = 0.048] and distant failure [HR substantial vs no: 4.4 (1.2-16.3); p = 0.027]. Both high-grade disease [HR 3 vs 1: 5.5 (1.2-25.6); p = 0.031] and extent of LVSI [HR substantial vs no: 4.4 (1.7-11.4); p = 0.002] predicted for worse disease-free survival.

DISCUSSION

Substantial LVSI was the strongest adverse prognostic factor for pelvic and distant failure in this cohort of EEC patients receiving adjuvant VB alone, suggesting this subset may benefit from additional adjuvant therapy. This study underscores the importance of quantifying LVSI extent in EEC.