Cost-effectiveness of maintenance hormonal therapy in patients with advanced low grade serous ovarian cancer

Hormone Receptors and Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: Recent Advances in Biology and Treatment Options

Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is a significant cause of cancer-related mortality in women. Despite advances in diagnosis and treatment, EOC remains a challenging disease to manage, and the 5-year survival rate is still poor. The role of hormone receptors (HRs) in EOC carcinogenesis and prognosis has been actively explored; however, the role of hormone therapy (HT) in the treatment of these tumors is not well established. Most available data on HT mainly come from retrospective series and small early clinical trials. Several of these studies suggest that HT may have a role in adjuvant, maintenance therapy, or in the case of recurrent disease, especially for some subtypes of EOC (e.g., low-grade serous EOC). Furthermore, HT has recently been combined with targeted therapies, but most studies evaluating these combinations are still ongoing. The main aim of this review is to provide an overview of the progress made in the last decade to characterize the biological and prognostic role of HRs for EOC and the developments in their therapeutic targeting through HT.

Trametinib for patients with recurrent low-grade serous ovarian cancer: A cost-effectiveness analysis

OBJECTIVE

The GOG 281/LOGS trial found that trametinib prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with recurrent low-grade serous ovarian cancer (LGSOC), compared with standard of care (SOC). The current study aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of trametinib versus standard of care for recurrent LGSOC from the US payer perspective.

METHODS

A Markov model was adopted to compare the cost and effectiveness of trametinib and standard of care group in patients with recurrent LGSOC. Life years (LYs), quality-adjusted LYs (QALYs), lifetime costs, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were calculated. One-way, and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to explore the model robustness.

RESULT

Trametinib group provided an additional 0.58 QALYs (1.14 LYs) and an incremental cost of $248,214 compared with the SOC group. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was $424,097 per QALY. The results of one-way sensitivity analyses suggested that our model was sensitive to the hazard ratio of OS and PFS between trametinib and SOC group, utility of PFS and the cycle cost of trametinib. Probabilistic sensitivity analyses revealed that there was 6% probability of the trametinib group being cost-effective at a willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of $150,000 per QALY.

CONCLUSIONS

From the US payer perspective, trametinib is not cost-effective for patients with recurrent LGSOC at the assumed WTP threshold of $150,000 per QALY. Based on the value standpoint, price reduction of trametinib is expected to improve the cost-effectiveness of trametinib in patients with recurrent LGSOC.

Hormone maintenance therapy for women with low-grade serous ovarian cancer in the front-line setting: A systematic review

OBJECTIVE

Low-grade serous ovarian cancer (LGSOC) is a rare form of ovarian cancer that accounts for 5-10% of epithelial ovarian cancers. LGSOCs are difficult to treat as they respond poorly to traditional chemotherapy treatments. This systematic review aims to appraise the literature describing the efficacy of hormone maintenance therapy (HMT) in patients with LGSOC given after cytoreductive surgery.

METHODS

Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews were searched from inception to November 2020. No language restrictions were applied. Publications describing HMT in the primary setting following cytoreductive surgery with or without chemotherapy in women with LGSOC were included. Publications describing HMT in recurrence, non-LGSOC carcinomas, and in-vitro or animal studies were excluded along with case reports, case series, and conference proceedings. We summarized oncologic outcomes, HMT used, and hormone receptor status where reported. Studies were assessed for risk of bias and quality of evidence.

RESULTS

The literature search identified 14,799 records. Four cohort studies met eligibility criteria. A total of 558 patients were included, of which 127 were treated with HMT. There was significant heterogeneity between studies demonstrated by differences in HMT regimens used, dosing, and study population, leading to various outcomes following treatment with HMT.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment of LGSOC remains a challenge. One retrospective study demonstrated improved progression-free survival following HMT for LGSOC, while two others failed to show significant improvements. However, there is limited data available in the literature which restricts the generalizability of these results. Therefore, well-designed, prospective, and randomized trials are needed to confirm the benefit of HMT in patients with this rare subgroup of ovarian cancer.