Impact of treatment modality on overall survival in women with advanced endometrial cancer: A National Cancer Database analysis

The Effects of Gynecological Tumor Irradiation on the Immune System

Radiobiology has evolved from a mechanistic model based on DNA damage and response factors into a more complex model that includes effects on the immune system and the tumor microenvironment (TME). Irradiation has an immunomodulatory effect that can manifest as increased anti-tumor immunity or immunosuppression. Irradiation promotes an inflammatory microenvironment through the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines and endothelial damage, which recruit immune system cells to the irradiated area. Radiation-induced immunogenic cell death (ICD), characterized by the release of damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) and tumor antigens, triggers an anti-tumor immune response of both innate and adaptive immunity. Anti-tumor immunity can manifest at a distance from the irradiated area, a phenomenon known as the abscopal effect (AE), which involves dendritic cells and CD8+ T cells. Irradiation also produces an immunosuppressive effect mediated by tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) and regulatory T lymphocytes (Tregs), which counterbalances the immunostimulatory effect. In this work, we review the mechanisms involved in the radiation-induced immune response, which support the combined treatment of RT and immunotherapy, focusing, where possible, on gynecologic cancer.

Survival Difference of Endometrial Cancer Patients with Peritoneal Metastasis Receiving Cytoreductive Surgery (CRS) with and without Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC): A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Although several studies have been completed to investigate the effect of cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with or without hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) in endometrial cancer with peritoneal metastasis (ECPM), a direct comparison was not performed previously. A meta-analysis was performed to investigate the suspected additional survival benefits of CRS plus HIPEC over CRS only. Twenty-one and ten studies with a total number of 1116 and 152 cases investigating CRS only and CRS plus HIPEC were identified, respectively. When all articles were analyzed, the 1-year survival rate was 17.60% higher for CRS plus HIPEC (82.28% vs. 64.68%; p = 0.0102). The same tendency was observed for the 2-year (56.07% vs. 36.95%; difference: 19.12%; p = 0.0014), but not for the 5-year (21.88% vs. 16.45%; difference: 5.43%; p = 0.3918) survival rates. The same clinical significance, but statistically less strong observations, could be made if only the studies published after 2010 were investigated (1-year survival rate: 12.08% and p = 0.0648; 2-year survival rate: 10.90% and p = 0.0988). CRS remains one of the core elements of ECPM treatment, but the addition of HIPEC to CRS can increase the positive clinical outcome, especially in the first 2 years.

Demographic Factors Predict Risk of Lymph Node Involvement in Patients with Endometrial Adenocarcinoma

The presence of lymph node positivity (LN+) guides adjuvant treatment for endometrial adenocarcinoma (EAC) patients, but recommendations regarding LN evaluation at the time of primary surgery remain variable. Sociodemographic factors in addition to pathologic tumor characteristics may more accurately predict risk of LN+ in EAC patients. Patients diagnosed between 2004 and 2016 with pathologic T1-T2 EAC who had at least one lymph node sampled at the time of surgery in the National Cancer Data Base were included. Pathologic primary tumor predictors of LN+ were identified using logistic regression. To predict overall, pelvic only, and paraaortic and/or pelvic LN+, nomograms were generated. Among the 35,170 EAC patients included, 2864 were node positive. Using multivariable analysis, younger patient age (OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.98-0.99, p < 0.001), black versus white race (OR 1.19, 95% CI 1.01-1.40, p = 0.04), increasing pathologic tumor stage and grade, increase in tumor size, and presence of lymphovascular invasion were predictive of regional LN+. Both black versus white (OR 1.64, 95% CI 1.27-2.09, p < 0.001) and other versus white race (OR 1.54, 95% CI 1.12-2.07, p = 0.006) strongly predicted paraaortic LN+ in the multivariable analysis. Independent subset analyses of black and white women revealed that tumor grade was a stronger predictor of LN+ among black women. In addition to standard pathologic tumor features, patient age and race were associated with a higher risk of regional LN+ generally and paraaortic LN+ specifically. This information may inform adjuvant treatment decisions and guide future studies.

JGOG2046: a feasibility study of neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by debulking surgery for clinically diagnosed FIGO stage IVb endometrial cancer

BACKGROUND

We evaluated the feasibility of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, followed by debulking surgery, for clinically diagnosed FIGO stage IVb endometrial cancer (protocol number: JGOG2046).

METHODS

The experimental treatment consisted of 3 cycles of paclitaxel (180 mg/m2) plus carboplatin (AUC5) followed by debulking surgery, including total abdominal hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, and 3 cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy. Patients were considered as eligible if they were pathologically diagnosed as primary endometrial cancer, and had both endometrial tumor and distant metastasis confirmed by imaging examinations. The primary endpoint was the incidence of patients who completed debulking surgery after the neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

RESULTS

While 51 patients were enrolled from 23 hospitals, the final study cohort consisted of 49 patients with a mean age of 59.0 years. Although the response ratio of the neoadjuvant chemotherapy was 65.3% (95% CI 50.4-78.3%), 67.3% (95% confidence interval (CI) 52.5-80.1%) underwent debulking surgery after the neoadjuvant chemotherapy and 59.2% (95% CI 45.2-71.8%) completed the protocol treatment including 3 courses of adjuvant chemotherapy. The median disease-free survival time was 9.1 months (95% CI 6.5-11.9), while the median overall survival time was 23.2 months (95% CI 11.9-27.8). A patient with sigmoid colon cancer and another with cervical cancer were included in this study.

CONCLUSIONS

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by debulking surgery was a feasible and acceptable treatment for metastatic endometrial cancer. (225 words).

Addition of Postoperative Radiation Therapy After Preoperative Chemotherapy and Surgery in Patients With Locally Advanced Endometrial Cancer Is Associated With Improved Outcomes

Purpose

Our purpose was to examine outcomes of patients with locally advanced endometrial cancer who undergo neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery (PreCT) with/without postoperative adjuvant radiation therapy. A secondary analysis of down staging and margin clearance was made with reference to those receiving upfront surgery and then adjuvant chemotherapy (PostCT).

Methods and Materials

The National Cancer Database was queried for FIGO (The International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics) stage III/IV locally advanced endometrial cancer cases who underwent definitive surgery from 2010 to 2016 and received chemotherapy as part of their treatment. Cases were classified into 2 cohorts: preoperative chemotherapy +/- postoperative chemotherapy cohort (PreCT) and postoperative chemotherapy cohort (PostCT) for reference for margin assessment. Cases who received preoperative radiation therapy were excluded while those who received postoperative radiation were included in the analysis. Primary endpoints were overall survival (OS), surgical margin status, rate of downstaging, and effect of adjuvant radiation therapy on OS among the PreCT cohort. Univariable (UVA) and multivariable (MVA) Cox regression analyses were performed.

Results

A total of 13,369 cases were identified with 1059 in PreCT and 12,310 in PostCT cohorts. PreCT had lower OS than PostCT (UVA: hazard ratio [HR], 2.18; P < .001; MVA: HR, 1.873; P < .001). PreCT cases with negative margins, who presumably had unresectable tumors initially, also had worse OS compared with PostCT with negative margins (UVA: HR, 2.20; P < .001; MVA: HR, 1.84; P < .001); however, PreCT with negative margins had similar survival to PostCT with positive margins (UVA: HR, 0.825; P < .001; MVA: P = .885). The addition of radiation after surgery in the PreCT cohort was associated with improved survival (5-year OS 20.5% compared with 50%, respectively; UVA: HR, 0.450; P < .001; MVA: HR, 0.337; P < .001). Although fewer cases in PreCT had negative margins compared with PostCT (72% compared with 84%, P < .001), approximately 19% of cases in PreCT had lower pathologic T-stage compared with clinical T-stage and 11% had lower N-stage.

Conclusions

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy was given in cases with worse oncologic prognostic factors, many of whom were likely unresectable at outset, compared with those who received postoperative chemotherapy. Although neoadjuvant chemotherapy is associated with tumor downstaging, survival is lower than with primary surgery probably because of these baseline differences. The addition of adjuvant radiation after surgery in cases who received preoperative chemotherapy is associated with improved survival.

Population-level uptake of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for stage IVB endometrial cancer

OBJECTIVE

To examine population-level trends, characteristics, and outcomes of patients with stage IVB endometrial cancer who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) prior to surgery.

METHODS

The National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program was retrospectively queried by examining 5505 patients with stage IVB endometrial cancer from 2010 to 2018. Exposure allocation was per treatment: primary surgery followed by chemotherapy (n = 3052, 55.4%), NACT followed by surgery (n = 930, 16.9%), and chemotherapy alone (n = 1523, 27.7%). Main outcomes measured were (i) the trend of utilization of NACT and patient characteristics related to NACT assessed with multinomial regression analysis and (ii) overall survival (OS) assessed with multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression model.

RESULTS

The number of patients receiving NACT prior to surgery increased from 11.6% to 21.7% whereas those undergoing primary surgery followed by chemotherapy decreased from 62.7% to 48.3% (P < 0.001). Increasing utilization of NACT remained independent in multivariable analysis (adjusted-odds ratio per one-year increments 1.11, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.08-1.15). Increasing utilization of NACT was observed in several sub-cohorts including patients aged <65 years, ≥65 years, White, non-White, endometrioid, non-endometrioid, and cases with non-distant organ metastasis (P < 0.05). In a multivariable analysis, NACT followed by surgery and primary surgery followed by chemotherapy had comparable OS (median 25 versus 26 months, adjusted-hazard ratio [HR] 1.03, 95%CI 0.93-1.15). When examined for metastatic extent, NACT followed by surgery was associated with decreased OS compared to primary surgery followed by chemotherapy in the non-distant organ metastasis group (adjusted-HR 1.20, 95%CI 1.05-1.36) whereas it was associated with improved OS in the distant organ metastasis group (adjusted-HR 0.79, 95%CI 0.66-0.95).

CONCLUSION

The treatment of stage IVB endometrial cancer is shifting from primary surgery to NACT in the United States.

Management of inoperable endometrial cancer

Some endometrial cancer (EMC) patients are not good candidates for primary surgery. The three major types of treatment for inoperable EMC are radiation therapy, chemotherapy, or their combination as neoadjuvant treatment before surgery. Radiation therapy alone (of different modes) has been used as the sole definitive therapeutic modality, particularly for early-stage disease that is limited to the uterine body and cervix with or without parametrial invasion. The most common treatment modality is neoadjuvant treatment before surgery. Postoperative adjuvant treatment is also occasionally used, depending mainly on the sites of the disease and the results of surgery. Data on neoadjuvant hormonal or radiation therapy are limited, with studies focusing on laboratory outcomes or having only a small number of patients. Most neoadjuvant treatments before surgery involved chemotherapy and fewer combined chemoradiotherapy. Surgery was generally performed, particularly in patients who had shown responses or at least stable disease to neoadjuvant treatment. Perioperative outcomes after neoadjuvant treatment were superior to those after primary surgery, whereas survival data were still inconsistent. Features that had or tended to have a favorable prognosis were younger age, early-stage disease, response to neoadjuvant treatment, low preoperative cancer antigen-125 level, and optimal surgery. Among different modalities of neoadjuvant treatment, which has become a frequent mode of treatment, neoadjuvant chemotherapy was more common than radiation therapy alone or chemoradiation.

Adoption of minimally invasive surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in women with metastatic uterine cancer

OBJECTIVE

Utilization of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) for advanced stage uterine cancer is increasing. We analyzed the use and outcomes of open versus minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for women with stage IV uterine cancer who received NACT and underwent IDS.

METHODS

The National Cancer Database was used to identify women with stage IV uterine cancer diagnosed from 2010 to 2017 and treated with NACT. Among women who underwent IDS, overall survival (OS) was compared between those who underwent laparotomy vs a minimally invasive approach. To account for imbalances in confounders, a propensity score analysis using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was performed.

RESULTS

A total of 1618 women were identified. Minimally invasive IDS was performed in 31.1% and increased from 16.2% in 2010 to 40.4% in 2017 (P < 0.001). More recent year of diagnosis and performance of surgery at a comprehensive cancer center were associated with increased use of MIS (P < 0.05). Women with serous and clear cell tumors, and carcinosarcomas (compared to endometrioid tumors), as well as Medicaid coverage (compared to commercial insurance) were less likely to undergo an MIS approach (P < 0.05). The median OS was 28 months (95% CI 23.7-30.7) and 24.3 months (95% CI 22.3-26.1) for MIS and laparotomy, respectively. After propensity score balancing, there was no association between the use of MIS and survival (HR = 0.90, 95% CI 0.71-1.14).

CONCLUSIONS

Among women with stage IV uterine cancer treated with NACT performance of minimally invasive debulking surgery is increasing. Compared to laparotomy, MIS does not appear to negatively impact survival.

Risk Stratification of Endometrial Cancer Patients: FIGO Stage, Biomarkers and Molecular Classification

Endometrial cancer (EC) is the most common gynaecologic malignancy in developed countries. The main challenge in EC management is to correctly estimate the risk of metastases at diagnosis and the risk to develop recurrences in the future. Risk stratification determines the need for surgical staging and adjuvant treatment. Detection of occult, microscopic metastases upstages patients, provides important prognostic information and guides adjuvant treatment. The molecular classification subdivides EC into four prognostic subgroups: POLE ultramutated; mismatch repair deficient (MMRd); nonspecific molecular profile (NSMP); and TP53 mutated (p53abn). How surgical staging should be adjusted based on preoperative molecular profiling is currently unknown. Moreover, little is known whether and how other known prognostic biomarkers affect prognosis prediction independent of or in addition to these molecular subgroups. This review summarizes the factors incorporated in surgical staging (i.e., peritoneal washing, lymph node dissection, omentectomy and peritoneal biopsies), and its impact on prognosis and adjuvant treatment decisions in an era of molecular classification of EC. Moreover, the relation between FIGO stage and molecular classification is evaluated including the current gaps in knowledge and future perspectives.

Efficacy of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy and interval debulking surgery in women with advanced uterine serous carcinoma

•

In this small series, HIPEC is well tolerated in patients with advanced USC.

•

HIPEC at IDS is associated with favorable PFS and OS in advanced USC.

•

Further investigation of HIPEC in women with advanced USC is warranted.

Objective(s)

To investigate the efficacy and safety of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) at the time of iterval debulking surgery (IDS) in women with advanced uterine serous carcinoma (USC) following neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT).

Methods

An IRB-approved single-institution prospective registry was queried to identify women with incidentally identified USC at the time of IDS + HIPEC for high-grade serous carcinoma. Patient demographic, oncologic, and surgical outcomes data were recorded. Univariate analysis determined progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).

Results

In total, seven patients were found to have advanced USC after undergoing IDS + HIPEC, with a median age of 64.5 years. The majority had stage IV, (n = 6, 85.7%), MMR proficient (n = 5, 71.4%), p53 mutant (n = 6, 85.1%) USC. The median pre-operative CA125 was 24.0U/mL. HIPEC regimen was cisplatin (n = 3, 42.9%) or cisplatin with paclitaxel (n = 4, 57.1%). All patients underwent optimal cytoreduction, with 71.4% (n = 5) having no gross residual disease. Accordion post-operative complications were mild in 14.3% (n = 1), moderate in 57.1% (n = 4) and severe in 14.3% (n = 1); 14.3% (n = 1) had no complications. The median length of stay was 6.5 days (IQR 4–8 days) with a median time to chemotherapy of 33.0 days. The median PFS was 14.0 months (95% CI 3.5–20.8 months), and the median OS was 27.0 months (95% CI 5.1- not reached).

Conclusions

In this small, prospective series, we demonstrate that IDS + HIPEC is well tolerated in patients with USC and is associated with favorable PFS and OS following NACT. Further prospective investigation is needed to validate these promising findings in larger, heterogeneous cohorts of women with advanced USC who are not candidates for primary surgical management.

Use and outcomes of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for metastatic uterine cancer

OBJECTIVE

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) has emerged as an alternative to primary cytoreductive surgery (PCS) for stage IV uterine cancer. We examined utilization, perioperative outcomes and survival for NACT and PCS for stage IV uterine cancer.

METHODS

The Surveillance, Epidemiology, End Results-Medicare database was used to identify women with stage IV uterine cancer treated from 2000 to 2015. Women were classified as NACT or PCS. Interval cytoreductive surgery (after NACT) or chemotherapy (after PCS) were recorded. The extent of surgery and perioperative outcomes were estimated for the groups. Multivariable proportional hazards models and Kaplan-Meier analyses were used to examine survival.

RESULTS

Among 3037 women, 1629 (53.6%) were treated with primary cytoreductive surgery, 554 (18.2%) with NACT, and 854 (28.1%) received no treatment. Use of NACT increased from 9.5% to 29.2%. After NACT, interval hysterectomy was performed in 159 (28.6%), while within the PCS group, 1052 (64.6%) received chemotherapy. Extended cytoreductive procedures were performed in 71.7% of women who received NACT vs. 79.1% after PCS (P = 0.03). The complication rate was 52.8% for NACT versus 56.2% for PCS (P = 0.42); medical complications were more frequently seen in the PCS group (39.4% versus 28.9%; P = 0.01). There was no difference in cancer specific (P = 0.48) or overall survival (P = 0.25) in women who received both chemotherapy and surgery regardless of whether the initial treatment was NACT or PCS.

CONCLUSION

Use of NACT is increasing for advanced stage uterine cancer. There was no difference in survival between NACT and primary cytoreductive surgery and NACT was associated with fewer perioperative medical complications.