Perceived social support in patients with endometrial or ovarian cancer: A secondary analysis from the ROGY care study

Symptoms, distress, finances, social support, resource utilization, and unmet care needs of patients with gynecological cancer

PURPOSE

This study explored the unmet care needs of gynecological cancer patients, including overall and subdomain needs (i.e., physical and daily living needs, psychological and emotional needs, care and support needs, and health-system and information needs), and related factors.

METHODS

In this cross-sectional study, gynecological cancer patients treated at a medical center in northern Taiwan were recruited. Data on demographics, symptoms, distress, finances, social support, resource utilization, and care needs were collected. Spearman's correlation and the Mann-Whitney U test were used for analysis.

RESULTS

This study of 118 cancer patients found that 73% had unmet psychological and emotional needs, followed by 54% with unmet health system and information needs. The most common physical symptoms were insomnia, fatigue, and pain, with 51.7% experiencing moderate or high levels of distress. Overall, the patients received considerable social support, both instrumental and emotional, primarily through medical information booklets (39.0%), cancer information websites (28.8%), and rehabilitative resources (20.3%). Factors associated with unmet care needs included younger age, non-ovarian cancer, symptoms (pain, fatigue, appetite loss, insomnia, dyspnea, nausea, and vomiting), distress, finances, social support, and the use of cancer information websites.

CONCLUSION

Psychological and emotional unmet needs is prevalent among patients with gynecological cancer; psychological support is crucial. Younger patients and those with non-ovarian cancer had more unmet care needs. These needs are linked to severe symptoms, distress, financial difficulties, limited social support, and low use of cancer information websites. Enhancing support for this population through targeted interventions is necessary.

Association between personality traits and psychological distress among postmenopausal women with coronary heart disease: A cross-sectional survey and mediation analysis

Postmenopausal women with negative personality characteristics are at an increased risk of psychological disorders, yet little is known about the mechanism underlying the relationship between type D personality and psychological distress in postmenopausal women with coronary disease. This study assessed the mediating roles of perceived social support and self-perceived burden in the relationship between type D and psychological distress based on the equity theory and stress-buffering model. Demographic characteristics, type D, psychological distress, perceived social support, and self-perceived burden were completed by 335 participants with self-reported questionnaires using a cross-sectional design in Southeast China. The results revealed that perceived social support and self-perceived burden both separately and serially mediated the relationship between type D personality and psychological distress. Effective intervention strategies aimed at improving perceived social support or reducing self-perceived burden may be beneficial in reducing psychological distress.

Association between Type-D Personality and Affective (Anxiety, Depression, Post-traumatic Stress) Symptoms and Maladaptive Coping in Breast Cancer Patients: A Longitudinal Study

Background:

Type-D (distressed) personality has not been prospectively explored for its association with psychosocial distress symptoms in breast cancer patients.

Objective:

The objective of the study was to test the hypothesis that Type-D personality can be associated with psychosocial distress variables in cancer over a 2-point period (6 month-follow-up).

Aims:

The aim of the study was to analyze the role of Type-D personality in relation to anxiety, depression, post-traumatic stress symptoms, general distress, and maladaptive coping among cancer patients.

Methods:

145 breast cancer patients were assessed within 6 months from diagnosis (T0) and again 6 months later (T1). The Type-D personality Scale, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, Depression subscale (HAD-D), the Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI-18) Anxiety subscale, the Distress Thermometer (DT), the Post-traumatic Symptoms (PTS) Impact of Event Scale (IES), and the Mini Mental Adjustment to Cancer (Mini-MAC) Anxious Preoccupation and Hopelessness scales were individually administered at T0 and T1.

Results:

One-quarter of cancer patients met the criteria for Type-D personality, which was stable over the follow-up time. The two main constructs of Type-D personality, namely social inhibition (SI) and negative affectivity (NA), were related to anxiety, depression, PTS, BSI-general distress and maladaptive coping (Mini-MAC anxious preoccupation and hopelessness). In regression analysis, Type-D SI was the most significant factor associated with the above-mentioned psychosocial variables, both at T0 and T1.

Conclusion:

Likewise other medical disorders (especially cardiology), Type-D personality has been confirmed to be a construct significantly related to psychosocial distress conditions and maladaptive coping that are usually part of assessment and intervention in cancer care. More attention to personality issues is important in oncology.