1
|
Dubsky P, Jackisch C, Im SA, Hunt KK, Li CF, Unger S, Paluch-Shimon S. BRCA genetic testing and counseling in breast cancer: how do we meet our patients' needs? NPJ Breast Cancer 2024; 10:77. [PMID: 39237557 PMCID: PMC11377442 DOI: 10.1038/s41523-024-00686-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2024] [Accepted: 08/19/2024] [Indexed: 09/07/2024] Open
Abstract
BRCA1 and BRCA2 are tumor suppressor genes that have been linked to inherited susceptibility of breast cancer. Germline BRCA1/2 pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants (gBRCAm) are clinically relevant for treatment selection in breast cancer because they confer sensitivity to poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors. BRCA1/2 mutation status may also impact decisions on other systemic therapies, risk-reducing measures, and choice of surgery. Consequently, demand for gBRCAm testing has increased. Several barriers to genetic testing exist, including limited access to testing facilities, trained counselors, and psychosocial support, as well as the financial burden of testing. Here, we describe current implications of gBRCAm testing for patients with breast cancer, summarize current approaches to gBRCAm testing, provide potential solutions to support wider adoption of mainstreaming testing practices, and consider future directions of testing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter Dubsky
- Breast and Tumor Center, Hirslanden Klinik St. Anna, Lucerne, Switzerland.
- University of Lucerne, Faculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, Lucerne, Switzerland.
| | - Christian Jackisch
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Breast and Gynecologic Cancer Center, Sana Klinikum Offenbach, Offenbach, Germany
| | - Seock-Ah Im
- Seoul National University Hospital, Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | | | - Chien-Feng Li
- National Institute of Cancer Research, National Health Research Institutes, Tainan, Taiwan
| | | | - Shani Paluch-Shimon
- Hadassah University Hospital & Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Morgan RD, Burghel GJ, Schlecht H, Clamp AR, Hasan J, Mitchell CL, Salih Z, Shaw J, Desai S, Jayson GC, Woodward ER, Evans DGR. Real-World Concordance between Germline and Tumour BRCA1/2 Status in Epithelial Ovarian Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 16:177. [PMID: 38201604 PMCID: PMC10778166 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16010177] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2023] [Revised: 12/22/2023] [Accepted: 12/26/2023] [Indexed: 01/12/2024] Open
Abstract
Patients diagnosed with epithelial ovarian cancer may undergo reflex tumour BRCA1/2 testing followed by germline BRCA1/2 testing in patients with a positive tumour test result. This testing model relies on tumour BRCA1/2 tests being able to detect all types of pathogenic variant. We analysed germline and tumour BRCA1/2 test results from patients treated for epithelial ovarian cancer at our specialist oncological referral centre. Tumour BRCA1/2 testing was performed using the next-generation sequencing (NGS)-based myChoice® companion diagnostic (CDx; Myriad Genetics, Inc.). Germline BRCA1/2 testing was performed in the North West Genomic Laboratory Hub using NGS and multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification. Between 11 April 2021 and 11 October 2023, 382 patients were successfully tested for tumour BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants. Of these, 367 (96.1%) patients were tested for germline BRCA1/2 variants. In those patients who underwent tumour and germline testing, 15.3% (56/367) had a BRCA1/2 pathogenic variant (36 germline and 20 somatic). All germline BRCA1/2 pathogenic small sequencing variants were detected in tumour DNA. By contrast, 3 out of 8 germline BRCA1/2 pathogenic large rearrangements were not reported in tumour DNA. The overall concordance of germline BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants detected in germline and tumour DNA was clinically acceptable at 91.7% (33/36). The myChoice® CDx was able to detect most germline BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants in tumour DNA, although a proportion of pathogenic large rearrangements were not reported. If Myriad's myChoice® CDx is used for tumour BRCA1/2 testing, our data supports a testing strategy of germline and tumour BRCA1/2 testing in all patients diagnosed with epithelial ovarian cancer aged < 79 years old, with germline BRCA1/2 testing only necessary for patients aged ≥ 80 years old with a tumour BRCA1/2 pathogenic variant.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert D. Morgan
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Wilmslow Road, Manchester M20 4BX, UK
- Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, School of Medical Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK
| | - George J. Burghel
- North West Genomic Laboratory Hub, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9WL, UK
- Division of Evolution, Infection and Genomics, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, School of Biological Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK
| | - Helene Schlecht
- North West Genomic Laboratory Hub, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9WL, UK
| | - Andrew R. Clamp
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Wilmslow Road, Manchester M20 4BX, UK
- Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, School of Medical Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK
| | - Jurjees Hasan
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Wilmslow Road, Manchester M20 4BX, UK
| | - Claire L. Mitchell
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Wilmslow Road, Manchester M20 4BX, UK
| | - Zena Salih
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Wilmslow Road, Manchester M20 4BX, UK
| | - Joseph Shaw
- Department of Gynaecological Pathology, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9WL, UK
| | - Sudha Desai
- Department of Pathology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Wilmslow Road, Manchester M20 4BX, UK
| | - Gordon C. Jayson
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Wilmslow Road, Manchester M20 4BX, UK
- Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, School of Medical Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK
| | - Emma R. Woodward
- North West Genomic Laboratory Hub, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9WL, UK
- Division of Evolution, Infection and Genomics, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, School of Biological Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9WL, UK
| | - D. Gareth R. Evans
- North West Genomic Laboratory Hub, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9WL, UK
- Division of Evolution, Infection and Genomics, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, School of Biological Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9WL, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Jones MA, Timms KM, Hatcher S, Cogan ES, Comeaux MS, Perry M, Morris B, Swedlund B, Elks CE, Lao-Sirieix P, Dearden S, Egile C, Brown JS, Harrington EA, Hodgson D, Stern M, Slavin TP, Mancini-DiNardo D. The landscape of BRCA1 and BRCA2 large rearrangements in an international cohort of over 20 000 ovarian tumors identified using next-generation sequencing. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 2023; 62:589-596. [PMID: 37222498 DOI: 10.1002/gcc.23150] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2022] [Revised: 04/20/2023] [Accepted: 04/24/2023] [Indexed: 05/25/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Approximately half of ovarian tumors have defects within the homologous recombination repair pathway. Tumors carrying pathogenic variants (PVs) in BRCA1/BRCA2 are more likely to respond to poly-ADP ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitor treatment. Large rearrangements (LRs) are a challenging class of variants to identify and characterize in tumor specimens and may therefore be underreported. This study describes the prevalence of pathogenic BRCA1/BRCA2 LRs in ovarian tumors and discusses the importance of their identification using a comprehensive testing strategy. METHODS Sequencing and LR analyses of BRCA1/BRCA2 were conducted in 20 692 ovarian tumors received between March 18, 2016 and February 14, 2023 for MyChoice CDx testing. MyChoice CDx uses NGS dosage analysis to detect LRs in BRCA1/BRCA2 genes using dense tiling throughout the coding regions and limited flanking regions. RESULTS Of the 2217 PVs detected, 6.3% (N = 140) were LRs. Overall, 0.67% of tumors analyzed carried a pathogenic LR. The majority of detected LRs were deletions (89.3%), followed by complex LRs (5.7%), duplications (4.3%), and retroelement insertions (0.7%). Notably, 25% of detected LRs encompassed a single or partial single exon. This study identified 84 unique LRs, 2 samples each carried 2 unique LRs in the same gene. We identified 17 LRs that occurred in multiple samples, some of which were specific to certain ancestries. Several cases presented here illustrate the intricacies involved in characterizing LRs, particularly when multiple events occur within the same gene. CONCLUSIONS Over 6% of PVs detected in the ovarian tumors analyzed were LRs. It is imperative for laboratories to utilize testing methodologies that will accurately detect LRs at a single exon resolution to optimize the identification of patients who may benefit from PARP inhibitor treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Matt Stern
- Myriad Genetics, Inc, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Morgan RD, Burghel GJ, Flaum N, Bulman M, Smith P, Clamp AR, Hasan J, Mitchell C, Salih Z, Woodward ER, Lalloo F, Shaw J, Desai S, Crosbie EJ, Edmondson RJ, Schlecht H, Wallace AJ, Jayson GC, Evans DGR. Predicting the likelihood of a BRCA1/2 pathogenic variant being somatic by testing only tumour DNA in non-mucinous high-grade epithelial ovarian cancer. J Clin Pathol 2023; 76:684-689. [PMID: 35738887 DOI: 10.1136/jcp-2022-208369] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2022] [Accepted: 06/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
AIMS Clinical guidelines recommend testing both germline and tumour DNA for BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants (PVs) in non-mucinous high-grade epithelial ovarian cancer (NMEOC). In this study, we show that some tumour BRCA1/2 PVs are highly likely to be somatic based on certain clinical and variant characteristics, meaning it may not be necessary to test all NMEOC cases for germline BRCA1/2 PVs. METHODS An observational study that included all tumour BRCA1/2 PVs detected in cases of NMEOC in the Northwest of England between July 2017 and February 2022. All tumour BRCA1/2 PVs were compared with PVs recorded in a prospectively gathered pan-cancer germline BRCA1/2 (gBRCA) testing database for the same geographical region (gBRCA1 PVs=910 and gBRCA2 PVs=922). Tumour BRCA1/2 PVs were categorised as common (≥1%), uncommon (<1%) or absent from the germline database. RESULTS One hundred and thirteen tumour BRCA1/2 PVs were detected in 111 NMEOC cases. There were 69 germline and 44 somatic variants. The mean age at diagnosis for gBRCA and somatic BRCA1/2 (sBRCA) PVs was 56.9 and 68.5 years, respectively (Student's t-test p<0.0001). All sBRCA PVs were detected in non-familial cases. All tumour BRCA1/2 PVs with a variant allele frequency (VAF) <35% in non-familial cases were somatic variants. Eighty-one per cent of germline-tumour BRCA1/2 PVs were present (common=31, uncommon=25) in the gBRCA testing database, while 89% of somatic-tumour BRCA1/2 PVs were absent (n=39). CONCLUSIONS We predict the likelihood of a tumour BRCA1/2 PV being somatic is 99.8% in non-familial cases of NMEOC diagnosed aged ≥75, where the VAF is ≤30% and there is no regional germline commonality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert D Morgan
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - George J Burghel
- North West Genomic Laboratory Hub, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Nicola Flaum
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
- North West Genomic Laboratory Hub, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
- Division of Evolution, Infection and Genomics, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Michael Bulman
- North West Genomic Laboratory Hub, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Philip Smith
- North West Genomic Laboratory Hub, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Andrew R Clamp
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
- Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Jurjees Hasan
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Claire Mitchell
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Zena Salih
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Emma R Woodward
- North West Genomic Laboratory Hub, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Fiona Lalloo
- North West Genomic Laboratory Hub, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Joseph Shaw
- Department of Histopathology, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Sudha Desai
- Department of Histopathology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Emma J Crosbie
- Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
- Department of Gynaecological Surgery, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Richard J Edmondson
- Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
- Department of Gynaecological Surgery, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Helene Schlecht
- North West Genomic Laboratory Hub, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Andrew J Wallace
- North West Genomic Laboratory Hub, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Gordon C Jayson
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
- Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - D Gareth R Evans
- North West Genomic Laboratory Hub, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
- Division of Evolution, Infection and Genomics, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
O'Malley DM, Krivak TC, Kabil N, Munley J, Moore KN. PARP Inhibitors in Ovarian Cancer: A Review. Target Oncol 2023; 18:471-503. [PMID: 37268756 PMCID: PMC10344972 DOI: 10.1007/s11523-023-00970-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 26.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/06/2023] [Indexed: 06/04/2023]
Abstract
Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors (PARPis) have transformed the ovarian cancer (OC) treatment landscape. This narrative review provides a comprehensive overview of data for the PARPis olaparib, niraparib, and rucaparib in patients with OC and discusses their role in disease management, with a focus on the use of PARPis as maintenance therapy in the United States (US). Olaparib was the first PARPi to be approved as first-line maintenance monotherapy in the US, with maintenance niraparib subsequently approved in the first-line setting. Data also support the efficacy of rucaparib as first-line maintenance monotherapy. PARPi maintenance combination therapy (olaparib plus bevacizumab) also provides benefit in patients with newly diagnosed advanced OC whose tumors tested positive for homologous recombination deficiency (HRD). Biomarker testing is critical in the newly diagnosed setting to identify patients most likely to benefit from PARPi maintenance therapy and guide treatment decisions. Clinical trial data support the use of PARPis (olaparib, niraparib, rucaparib) as second-line or later maintenance therapy in patients with platinum-sensitive relapsed OC. Although distinct differences in tolerability profile were observed between PARPis, they were generally well tolerated, with the majority of adverse events managed by dose modification. PARPis had no detrimental effect on patients' health-related quality of life. Real-world data support the use of PARPis in OC, although some differences between PARPis are apparent. Data from trials investigating novel combination strategies, such as PARPis plus immune checkpoint inhibitors, are awaited with interest; the optimal sequencing of novel therapies in OC remains to be established.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David M O'Malley
- Division of Gynecology Oncology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute, Columbus, OH, USA. David.O'
| | | | - Nashwa Kabil
- US Medical Affairs, Oncology Medical, AstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, MD, USA
| | - Jiefen Munley
- Global Patient Safety, AstraZeneca, Wilmington, DE, USA
| | - Kathleen N Moore
- Stephenson Cancer Center at the University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Azzollini J, Agnelli L, Conca E, Torelli T, Busico A, Capone I, Angelini M, Tamborini E, Perrone F, Vingiani A, Lorenzini D, Peissel B, Pruneri G, Manoukian S. Prevalence of BRCA homopolymeric indels in an ION Torrent-based tumour-to-germline testing workflow in high-grade ovarian carcinoma. Sci Rep 2023; 13:7781. [PMID: 37179432 PMCID: PMC10182972 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-33857-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2023] [Accepted: 04/20/2023] [Indexed: 05/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Tumour DNA sequencing is essential for precision medicine since it guides therapeutic decisions but also fosters the identification of patients who may benefit from germline testing. Notwithstanding, the tumour-to-germline testing workflow presents a few caveats. The low sensitivity for indels at loci with sequences of identical bases (homopolymers) of ion semiconductor-based sequencing techniques represents a well-known limitation, but the prevalence of indels overlooked by these techniques in high-risk populations has not been investigated. In our study, we addressed this issue at the homopolymeric regions of BRCA1/2 in a retrospectively selected cohort of 157 patients affected with high-grade ovarian cancer and negative at tumour testing by ION Torrent sequencing. Variant allele frequency (VAF) of indels at each of the 29 investigated homopolymers was systematically revised with the IGV software. Thresholds to discriminate putative germline variants were defined by scaling the VAF to a normal distribution and calculating the outliers that exceeded the mean + 3 median-adjusted deviations of a control population. Sanger sequencing of the outliers confirmed the occurrence of only one of the five putative indels in both tumour and blood from a patient with a family history of breast cancer. Our results indicated that the prevalence of homopolymeric indels overlooked by ion semiconductor techniques is seemingly low. A careful evaluation of clinical and family history data would further help minimise this technique-bound limitation, highlighting cases in which a deeper look at these regions would be recommended.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacopo Azzollini
- Unit of Medical Genetics, Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, via Venezian 1, 20133, Milan, Italy
| | - Luca Agnelli
- Department of Advanced Diagnostics, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, via Venezian 1, 20133, Milan, Italy
- Medical Oncology 1 Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, via Venezian 1, 20133, Milan, Italy
| | - Elena Conca
- Department of Advanced Diagnostics, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, via Venezian 1, 20133, Milan, Italy
| | - Tommaso Torelli
- Department of Advanced Diagnostics, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, via Venezian 1, 20133, Milan, Italy
- Medical Oncology 1 Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, via Venezian 1, 20133, Milan, Italy
| | - Adele Busico
- Department of Advanced Diagnostics, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, via Venezian 1, 20133, Milan, Italy
| | - Iolanda Capone
- Department of Advanced Diagnostics, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, via Venezian 1, 20133, Milan, Italy
| | - Marta Angelini
- Department of Advanced Diagnostics, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, via Venezian 1, 20133, Milan, Italy
| | - Elena Tamborini
- Department of Advanced Diagnostics, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, via Venezian 1, 20133, Milan, Italy
| | - Federica Perrone
- Department of Advanced Diagnostics, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, via Venezian 1, 20133, Milan, Italy
| | - Andrea Vingiani
- Department of Advanced Diagnostics, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, via Venezian 1, 20133, Milan, Italy
- Oncology and Hemato-Oncology Department, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Daniele Lorenzini
- Department of Advanced Diagnostics, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, via Venezian 1, 20133, Milan, Italy
| | - Bernard Peissel
- Unit of Medical Genetics, Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, via Venezian 1, 20133, Milan, Italy
| | - Giancarlo Pruneri
- Department of Advanced Diagnostics, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, via Venezian 1, 20133, Milan, Italy
- Oncology and Hemato-Oncology Department, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Siranoush Manoukian
- Unit of Medical Genetics, Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, via Venezian 1, 20133, Milan, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Association of location of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations with benefit from olaparib and bevacizumab maintenance in high-grade ovarian cancer: phase III PAOLA-1/ENGOT-ov25 trial subgroup exploratory analysis. Ann Oncol 2023; 34:152-162. [PMID: 36564284 DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2022.11.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2022] [Revised: 09/15/2022] [Accepted: 11/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In the phase III PAOLA-1 study, the addition of maintenance olaparib to bevacizumab in patients with newly diagnosed high-grade ovarian cancer (HGOC) resulted in prolonged progression-free survival (PFS), particularly for homologous recombination deficiency-positive tumors, including those with a BRCA mutation (BRCAm). The magnitude of benefit from olaparib and bevacizumab according to the location of mutation in BRCA1/BRCA2 remains to be explored. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with advanced-stage HGOC responding after platinum-based chemotherapy + bevacizumab received maintenance therapy bevacizumab (15 mg/kg q3w for 15 months) + either olaparib (300 mg b.i.d. for 24 months) or placebo. PFS was analyzed in the subgroup of patients with BRCA1m/BRCA2m according to mutation location in the functional domains of BRCA1 [Really Interesting Gene (RING), DNA-binding domain (DBD), or C-terminal domain of BRCA1 (BRCT)] and BRCA2 [RAD51-binding domain (RAD51-BD); DBD]. RESULTS From 806 randomized patients, 159 harbored BRCA1m (19.7%) and 74 BRCA2m (9.2%). BRCA1m in RING, DBD, and BRCT domains was detected in 18, 40, and 33 patients, and BRCA2m in RAD51-BD and DBD in 36 and 13 patients, respectively. After a median follow-up of 25.5 months, benefit from maintenance olaparib + bevacizumab was observed irrespective of location of BRCAm. The benefit was particularly high for those with BRCA1m located in the DBD, with 24-month PFS estimated to be 89% and 15% [olaparib + bevacizumab versus placebo + bevacizumab hazard ratio = 0.08 (95% confidence interval 0.02-0.28); interaction P = 0.03]. In BRCA2m patients, 24-month PFS rates for those with mutations located in the DBD were 90% and 100% (olaparib + bevacizumab versus placebo + bevacizumab), respectively. CONCLUSIONS Advanced-stage BRCA-mutated HGOC patients reported PFS benefit from maintenance olaparib and bevacizumab regardless of mutation location. The benefit is particularly high for patients with mutations located in the DBD of BRCA1. Mutations located in the DBD of BRCA2 are also associated with excellent outcome.
Collapse
|
8
|
Morgan RD, Burghel GJ, Flaum N, Bulman M, Smith P, Clamp AR, Hasan J, Mitchell CL, Salih Z, Woodward ER, Lalloo F, Crosbie EJ, Edmondson RJ, Wallace AJ, Jayson GC, Evans DGR. BRCA1/2 in non-mucinous epithelial ovarian cancer: tumour with or without germline testing? Br J Cancer 2022; 127:163-167. [PMID: 35260807 PMCID: PMC9276796 DOI: 10.1038/s41416-022-01773-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2021] [Revised: 02/04/2022] [Accepted: 02/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
National guidelines recommend testing all cases of non-mucinous epithelial ovarian cancer (NMEOC) for germline (blood) and somatic (tumour) BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants (PVs). We performed paired germline and somatic BRCA1/2 testing in consecutive cases of NMEOC (n = 388) to validate guidelines. Thirty-four somatic BRCA1/2 (sBRCA) PVs (9.7%) were detected in 350 cases with germline BRCA1/2 (gBRCA) wild-type. All sBRCA PVs were detected in non-familial cases. By analysing our regional germline BRCA1/2 database there were 92/1114 (8.3%) gBRCA PVs detected in non-familial cases (only 3% ≥70 years old) and 245/641 (38.2%) in familial cases. Germline non-familial cases were dominated by BRCA2 in older women (8/271 ≥ 70 years old, all BRCA2). The ratio of sBRCA-to-gBRCA was ≤1.0 in women aged <70 years old, compared to 5.2 in women aged ≥70 years old (P = 0.005). The likelihood of missed germline BRCA1/2 PVs (copy-number variants missed on most somatic assays) by testing only tumour DNA was 0.4% in women aged ≥70 years old. We recommend reflex tumour BRCA1/2 testing in all NMEOC cases, and that gBRCA testing is not required for women aged ≥70 years old with no identifiable tumour BRCA1/2 PV and/or family history of breast, ovarian, prostate and/or pancreatic cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert D Morgan
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK. .,Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
| | - George J Burghel
- Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Nicola Flaum
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.,Division of Evolution & Genomic Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Michael Bulman
- Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Philip Smith
- Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Andrew R Clamp
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.,Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Jurjees Hasan
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Claire L Mitchell
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Zena Salih
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Emma R Woodward
- Division of Evolution & Genomic Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.,Department of Clinical Genetics, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Fiona Lalloo
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Emma J Crosbie
- Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.,Department of Gynaecological Surgery, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Richard J Edmondson
- Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.,Department of Gynaecological Surgery, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Andrew J Wallace
- Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Gordon C Jayson
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.,Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - D Gareth R Evans
- Division of Evolution & Genomic Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.,Department of Clinical Genetics, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Tumor BRCA Testing in Epithelial Ovarian Cancers: Past and Future-Five-Years' Single-Institution Experience of 762 Consecutive Patients. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14071638. [PMID: 35406410 PMCID: PMC8996829 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14071638] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2022] [Revised: 03/04/2022] [Accepted: 03/16/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Tumor BRCA testing is crucial in the clinical management of women affected by epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). In the present study, we aimed to report the results of five years of experience in tumor BRCA testing performed in a single-institution diagnostic setting. We profiled 762 consecutive EOC patients with a failure rate of less than 1% and less than two weeks of turnaround time, which is consistent with the clinical needs. We identified 23.4% of cases with pathogenic/likely pathogenic mutations, including 76% of patients affected by germline and 24% by somatic alterations. Here, we proposed a comprehensive and multidisciplinary clinical workflow that could be successfully followed for the identification of somatic as well as germline alterations, maximizing the benefit of BRCA testing both from a therapeutic and risk assessment perspective. Abstract The establishment of PARP inhibitors in the treatment of epithelial ovarian carcinoma (EOC) has prompt BRCA assessment at the time of diagnosis. We described our five years of experience of tumor BRCA testing, as part of a multidisciplinary workflow for the management of EOC patients. We used a BRCA next-generation sequencing (NGS) test for profiling formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) EOCs of 762 consecutive patients, with a success rate of 99.7% and a median turnaround time of 12 days. We found 178 (23.4%) cases with pathogenic/likely pathogenic (P/LP) mutations, 74 (9.7%) cases with variants of uncertain significance and 508 (66.8%) wild type tumors. Among 174 patients without P/LP mutations and investigated with multiple-ligation probe-amplification analysis on peripheral blood, two (1.1%) were positive for large rearrangements. Patients with P/LP alterations and/or with positive family history were referred to genetic counselling. Comparing tumor and blood NGS test results of 256 patients, we obtained a tumor test negative predictive value of 100% and we defined 76% of P/LP alterations as germline and 24% as somatic variants. The proposed workflow may successfully identify EOC patients with BRCA1/2 alteration, guiding both therapeutic and risk assessment clinical decisions.
Collapse
|