1
|
Wong RWC, Cheung ANY. Predictive and prognostic biomarkers in female genital tract tumours: an update highlighting their clinical relevance and practical issues. Pathology 2024; 56:214-227. [PMID: 38212229 DOI: 10.1016/j.pathol.2023.10.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2023] [Revised: 10/24/2023] [Accepted: 10/29/2023] [Indexed: 01/13/2024]
Abstract
The evaluation of biomarkers by molecular techniques and immunohistochemistry has become increasingly relevant to the treatment of female genital tract tumours as a consequence of the greater availability of therapeutic options and updated disease classifications. For ovarian cancer, mutation testing for BRCA1/2 is the standard predictive biomarker for poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor therapy, while homologous recombination deficiency testing may allow the identification of eligible patients among cases without demonstrable BRCA1/2 mutations. Clinical recommendations are available which specify how these predictive biomarkers should be applied. Mismatch repair (MMR) protein and folate receptor alpha immunohistochemistry may also be used to guide treatment in ovarian cancer. In endometrial cancer, MMR immunohistochemistry is the preferred test for predicting benefit from immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy, but molecular testing for microsatellite instability may have a supplementary role. HER2 testing by immunohistochemistry and in situ hybridisation is applicable to endometrial serous carcinomas to assess trastuzumab eligibility. Immunohistochemistry for oestrogen receptor and progesterone receptor expression may be used for prognostication in endometrial cancer, but its predictive value for hormonal therapy is not yet proven. POLE mutation testing and p53 immunohistochemistry (as a surrogate for TP53 mutation status) serve as prognostic markers for favourable and adverse outcomes, respectively, in endometrial cancer, especially when combined with MMR testing for molecular subtype designation. For cervical cancer, programmed death ligand 1 immunohistochemistry may be used to predict benefit from ICI therapy although its predictive value is under debate. In vulvar cancer, p16 and p53 immunohistochemistry has established prognostic value, stratifying patients into three groups based on the human papillomavirus and TP53 mutation status of the tumour. Awareness of the variety and pitfalls of expression patterns for p16 and p53 in vulvar carcinomas is crucial for accurate designation. It is hoped that collaborative efforts in standardising and optimising biomarker testing for gynaecological tumours will contribute to evidence-based therapeutic decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard Wing-Cheuk Wong
- Department of Pathology, United Christian Hospital, Kwun Tong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of China.
| | - Annie N Y Cheung
- Department of Pathology, School of Clinical Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kramer C, Lanjouw L, Ruano D, Ter Elst A, Santandrea G, Solleveld-Westerink N, Werner N, van der Hout AH, de Kroon CD, van Wezel T, Berger L, Jalving M, Wesseling J, Smit V, de Bock GH, van Asperen CJ, Mourits M, Vreeswijk M, Bart J, Bosse T. Causality and functional relevance of BRCA1 and BRCA2 pathogenic variants in non-high-grade serous ovarian carcinomas. J Pathol 2024; 262:137-146. [PMID: 37850614 DOI: 10.1002/path.6218] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2023] [Revised: 08/18/2023] [Accepted: 09/13/2023] [Indexed: 10/19/2023]
Abstract
The identification of causal BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants (PVs) in epithelial ovarian carcinoma (EOC) aids the selection of patients for genetic counselling and treatment decision-making. Current recommendations therefore stress sequencing of all EOCs, regardless of histotype. Although it is recognised that BRCA1/2 PVs cluster in high-grade serous ovarian carcinomas (HGSOC), this view is largely unsubstantiated by detailed analysis. Here, we aimed to analyse the results of BRCA1/2 tumour sequencing in a centrally revised, consecutive, prospective series including all EOC histotypes. Sequencing of n = 946 EOCs revealed BRCA1/2 PVs in 125 samples (13%), only eight of which were found in non-HGSOC histotypes. Specifically, BRCA1/2 PVs were identified in high-grade endometrioid (3/20; 15%), low-grade endometrioid (1/40; 2.5%), low-grade serous (3/67; 4.5%), and clear cell (1/64; 1.6%) EOCs. No PVs were identified in any mucinous ovarian carcinomas tested. By re-evaluation and using loss of heterozygosity and homologous recombination deficiency analyses, we then assessed: (1) whether the eight 'anomalous' cases were potentially histologically misclassified and (2) whether the identified variants were likely causal in carcinogenesis. The first 'anomalous' non-HGSOC with a BRCA1/2 PV proved to be a misdiagnosed HGSOC. Next, germline BRCA2 variants, found in two p53-abnormal high-grade endometrioid tumours, showed substantial evidence supporting causality. One additional, likely causal variant, found in a p53-wildtype low-grade serous ovarian carcinoma, was of somatic origin. The remaining cases showed retention of the BRCA1/2 wildtype allele, suggestive of non-causal secondary passenger variants. We conclude that likely causal BRCA1/2 variants are present in high-grade endometrioid tumours but are absent from the other EOC histotypes tested. Although the findings require validation, these results seem to justify a transition from universal to histotype-directed sequencing. Furthermore, in-depth functional analysis of tumours harbouring BRCA1/2 variants combined with detailed revision of cancer histotypes can serve as a model in other BRCA1/2-related cancers. © 2023 The Authors. The Journal of Pathology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of The Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cjh Kramer
- Department of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - L Lanjouw
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - D Ruano
- Department of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - A Ter Elst
- Department of Pathology and Medical Biology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - G Santandrea
- Pathology Unit, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - N Solleveld-Westerink
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - N Werner
- Department of Pathology and Medical Biology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - A H van der Hout
- Department of Genetics, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - C D de Kroon
- Department of Gynecology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - T van Wezel
- Department of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Lpv Berger
- Department of Genetics, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - M Jalving
- Department of Medical Oncology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - J Wesseling
- Department of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
- Department of Pathology, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Division of Molecular Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Vthbm Smit
- Department of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - G H de Bock
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - C J van Asperen
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Mje Mourits
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Mpg Vreeswijk
- Department of Human Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - J Bart
- Department of Pathology and Medical Biology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - T Bosse
- Department of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Luo Y, Pan R, Rao H, Chen X, Yang H. Association Between Germline BRCA1/2 Gene Variants and Clinicopathological Features of Ovarian Cancer. Int J Gen Med 2024; 17:75-84. [PMID: 38226182 PMCID: PMC10789571 DOI: 10.2147/ijgm.s445660] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2023] [Accepted: 01/03/2024] [Indexed: 01/17/2024] Open
Abstract
Objective To investigate the relationship between BRCA1/2 gene mutation and clinicopathological features in ovarian cancer patients, so as to develop precise individualized treatment plan for patients. Methods Patients diagnosed with ovarian cancer between January 2018 and July 2023 who underwent BRCA1/2 genetic testing were retrospectively analyzed. The clinicopathological characteristics (age, body mass index (BMI), family history of ovarian cancer, pregnancy history, menopause status, tumor size, histopathology, Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) staging, and ascites) of non-carriers and BRCA1/2 variant carriers were compared. Logistic regression analysis was used to explore the relationship between BRCA1/2 variants and clinicopathological characteristics of ovarian cancer. Results A total of 284 ovarian cancer patients were collected, and the subjects were divided into two groups, 197 non-carriers and 87 BRCA1/2 variants carriers. The proportion of serous ovarian carcinoma in BRCA1/2 variant carriers is higher than that in non-BRCA variant carriers (78.2% vs 60.9%, p=0.015). There were 51 patients with BRCA pathogenic or likely pathogenic variant, 22 patients with BRCA likely benign variant, and 14 patients with BRCA variants of uncertain significance (VUS). The proportion of serous ovarian carcinoma in patients with BRCA pathogenic/likely pathogenic variant is higher than that in patients with BRCA likely benign variant and BRCA VUS (94.1% vs 50.0% and 64.3%. p<0.001). There were no statistically significant differences in BMI, family history of ovarian cancer, pregnancy history, menopause status, maximum diameter of the tumor lesion, FIGO stage, and ascites among patients with different grades of variants. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that serous ovarian carcinoma was related to BRCA mutation (Serous carcinoma vs non-serous carcinoma: OR 2.145, 95% CI: 1.044-4.407) (p=0.038). Conclusion Patients with BRCA1 variant develop ovarian cancer at a younger age than those with the BRCA2 variant. The proportion of FIGO stage III-IV in patients with BRCA pathogenic + likely pathogenic variant was significantly higher than those in patients with other variants. Germline BRCA1/2 variants were most frequently identified in serous ovarian carcinoma patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yu Luo
- Department of Gynaecology, Meizhou People’s Hospital, Meizhou Academy of Medical Sciences, Meizhou, People’s Republic of China
- Meizhou Municipal Engineering and Technology Research Center for Molecular Diagnostics of Major Genetic Disorders, Meizhou People’s Hospital, Meizhou, People’s Republic of China
| | - Ru Pan
- Department of Gynaecology, Meizhou People’s Hospital, Meizhou Academy of Medical Sciences, Meizhou, People’s Republic of China
- Meizhou Municipal Engineering and Technology Research Center for Molecular Diagnostics of Major Genetic Disorders, Meizhou People’s Hospital, Meizhou, People’s Republic of China
| | - Hui Rao
- Meizhou Municipal Engineering and Technology Research Center for Molecular Diagnostics of Major Genetic Disorders, Meizhou People’s Hospital, Meizhou, People’s Republic of China
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Meizhou People’s Hospital, Meizhou Academy of Medical Sciences, Meizhou, People’s Republic of China
| | - Xing Chen
- Data Center, Meizhou People’s Hospital, Meizhou Academy of Medical Sciences, Meizhou, People’s Republic of China
| | - Haikun Yang
- Department of Gynaecology, Meizhou People’s Hospital, Meizhou Academy of Medical Sciences, Meizhou, People’s Republic of China
- Meizhou Municipal Engineering and Technology Research Center for Molecular Diagnostics of Major Genetic Disorders, Meizhou People’s Hospital, Meizhou, People’s Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Horackova K, Janatova M, Kleiblova P, Kleibl Z, Soukupova J. Early-Onset Ovarian Cancer <30 Years: What Do We Know about Its Genetic Predisposition? Int J Mol Sci 2023; 24:17020. [PMID: 38069345 PMCID: PMC10707471 DOI: 10.3390/ijms242317020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2023] [Revised: 11/27/2023] [Accepted: 11/29/2023] [Indexed: 12/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Ovarian cancer (OC) is one of the leading causes of cancer-related deaths in women. Most patients are diagnosed with advanced epithelial OC in their late 60s, and early-onset adult OC diagnosed ≤30 years is rare, accounting for less than 5% of all OC cases. The most significant risk factor for OC development are germline pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants (GPVs) in OC predisposition genes (including BRCA1, BRCA2, BRIP1, RAD51C, RAD51D, Lynch syndrome genes, or BRIP1), which contribute to the development of over 20% of all OC cases. GPVs in BRCA1/BRCA2 are the most prevalent. The presence of a GPV directs tailored cancer risk-reducing strategies for OC patients and their relatives. Identification of OC patients with GPVs can also have therapeutic consequences. Despite the general assumption that early cancer onset indicates higher involvement of hereditary cancer predisposition, the presence of GPVs in early-onset OC is rare (<10% of patients), and their heritability is uncertain. This review summarizes the current knowledge on the genetic predisposition to early-onset OC, with a special focus on epithelial OC, and suggests other alternative genetic factors (digenic, oligogenic, polygenic heritability, genetic mosaicism, imprinting, etc.) that may influence the development of early-onset OC in adult women lacking GPVs in known OC predisposition genes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Klara Horackova
- Institute of Medical Biochemistry and Laboratory Diagnostics, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, 128 00 Prague, Czech Republic; (K.H.); (M.J.); (P.K.); (Z.K.)
| | - Marketa Janatova
- Institute of Medical Biochemistry and Laboratory Diagnostics, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, 128 00 Prague, Czech Republic; (K.H.); (M.J.); (P.K.); (Z.K.)
| | - Petra Kleiblova
- Institute of Medical Biochemistry and Laboratory Diagnostics, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, 128 00 Prague, Czech Republic; (K.H.); (M.J.); (P.K.); (Z.K.)
- Institute of Biology and Medical Genetics, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, 128 00 Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Zdenek Kleibl
- Institute of Medical Biochemistry and Laboratory Diagnostics, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, 128 00 Prague, Czech Republic; (K.H.); (M.J.); (P.K.); (Z.K.)
- Institute of Pathological Physiology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, 128 00 Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Jana Soukupova
- Institute of Medical Biochemistry and Laboratory Diagnostics, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, 128 00 Prague, Czech Republic; (K.H.); (M.J.); (P.K.); (Z.K.)
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Lanjouw L, Mourits MJE, Bart J, Ter Elst A, Berger LPV, van der Hout AH, Alam N, de Bock GH. BRCA1/2 testing rates in epithelial ovarian cancer: a focus on the untested patients. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2023; 33:1260-1269. [PMID: 37137525 PMCID: PMC10423510 DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2023-004307] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2023] [Accepted: 04/07/2023] [Indexed: 05/05/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Since 2015, Dutch guidelines have recommended BRCA1/2 pathogenic variant testing for all patients with epithelial ovarian cancer. Recently, recommendations shifted from germline testing to the tumor-first approach, in which tumor tissue is tested first, and subsequent germline testing is performed only in those with BRCA1/2 tumor pathogenic variants or a positive family history. Data on testing rates and on characteristics of patients missing out on testing remain scarce. OBJECTIVE To evaluate BRCA1/2 testing rates in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer and compare testing rates of germline testing (performed from 2015 until mid-2018) versus tumor-first testing (implemented mid-2018). METHODS A consecutive series of 250 patients diagnosed with epithelial ovarian cancer between 2016 and 2019 was included from the OncoLifeS data-biobank of the University Medical Center Groningen, the Netherlands. Testing rates were analyzed for the overall study population and for germline testing (period I) and tumor-first testing (period II) separately. Characteristics of tested and untested patients were compared and predictors for receiving testing were assessed with multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS Median age was 67.0 years (IQR 59.0-73.0) and 173 (69.2%) patients were diagnosed with high-grade serous carcinoma. Overall, 201 (80.4%) patients were tested. In period I, 137/171 (80.1%) patients were tested and in period II this was 64/79 (81.0%). Patients with non-high-grade serous carcinoma were significantly less likely to receive BRCA1/2 testing than patients with high-grade serous carcinoma (OR=0.23, 95% CI 0.11 to 0.46, p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS The results show that BRCA1/2 testing rates are suboptimal and suggest that clinicians may not be choosing to test patients with epithelial ovarian cancer with non-high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma, although guidelines recommend BRCA1/2 testing in all patients with epithelial ovarian cancer. Suboptimal testing rates limit optimization of care for patients with epithelial ovarian cancer and counseling of potentially affected relatives.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lieke Lanjouw
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Marian J E Mourits
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Joost Bart
- Department of Pathology and Medical Biology, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Arja Ter Elst
- Department of Pathology and Medical Biology, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Lieke P V Berger
- Department of Genetics, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Annemieke H van der Hout
- Department of Genetics, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Naufil Alam
- AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP, Cambridge, UK
| | - Geertruida H de Bock
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Jank P, Leichsenring J, Kolb S, Hoffmann I, Bischoff P, Kunze CA, Dragomir MP, Gleitsmann M, Jesinghaus M, Schmitt WD, Kulbe H, Sers C, Stenzinger A, Sehouli J, Braicu IE, Westhoff C, Horst D, Denkert C, Gröschel S, Taube ET. High EVI1 and PARP1 expression as favourable prognostic markers in high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma. J Ovarian Res 2023; 16:150. [PMID: 37525239 PMCID: PMC10388497 DOI: 10.1186/s13048-023-01239-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2023] [Accepted: 07/16/2023] [Indexed: 08/02/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Mechanisms of development and progression of high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) are poorly understood. EVI1 and PARP1, part of TGF-ß pathway, are upregulated in cancers with DNA repair deficiencies with DNA repair deficiencies and may influce disease progression and survival. Therefore we questioned the prognostic significance of protein expression of EVI1 alone and in combination with PARP1 and analyzed them in a cohort of patients with HGSOC. METHODS For 562 HGSOC patients, we evaluated EVI1 and PARP1 expression by immunohistochemical staining on tissue microarrays with QuPath digital semi-automatic positive cell detection. RESULTS High EVI1 expressing (> 30% positive tumor cells) HGSOC were associated with improved progression-free survival (PFS) (HR = 0.66, 95% CI: 0.504-0.852, p = 0.002) and overall survival (OS) (HR = 0.45, 95% CI: 0.352-0.563, p < 0.001), including multivariate analysis. Most interestingly, mutual high expression of both proteins identifies a group with particularly good prognosis. Our findings were proven technically and clinically using bioinformatical data sets for single-cell sequencing, copy number variation and gene as well as protein expression. CONCLUSIONS EVI1 and PARP1 are robust prognostic biomarkers for favorable prognosis in HGSOC and imply further research with respect to their reciprocity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul Jank
- Institute of Pathology, Philipps-University Marburg, University Hospital Marburg (UKGM), Marburg, Germany
| | - Jonas Leichsenring
- Institute of Pathology, Zytologie Und Molekulare Diagnostik, REGIOMED, Klinikum Coburg, Coburg, Germany
| | - Svenja Kolb
- Department of Gynecology, Vivantes Netzwerk Für Gesundheit GmbH Berlin, Vivantes Hospital Neukölln, Rudower Straße 48, 12351, Berlin, Germany
| | - Inga Hoffmann
- Institute of Pathology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität Zu Berlin, CCM, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany
| | - Philip Bischoff
- Institute of Pathology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität Zu Berlin, CCM, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany
| | - Catarina Alisa Kunze
- Institute of Pathology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität Zu Berlin, CCM, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany
| | - Mihnea P Dragomir
- Institute of Pathology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität Zu Berlin, CCM, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany
| | - Moritz Gleitsmann
- Institute of Pathology, Philipps-University Marburg, University Hospital Marburg (UKGM), Marburg, Germany
| | - Moritz Jesinghaus
- Institute of Pathology, Philipps-University Marburg, University Hospital Marburg (UKGM), Marburg, Germany
| | - Wolfgang D Schmitt
- Institute of Pathology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität Zu Berlin, CCM, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany
| | - Hagen Kulbe
- Tumorbank Ovarian Cancer Network, Charité, Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität Zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, 10117, Berlin, Germany
- Department of Gynecology, European Competence Center for Ovarian Cancer, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität Zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, 10117, Berlin, Germany
| | - Christine Sers
- Institute of Pathology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität Zu Berlin, CCM, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Jalid Sehouli
- Tumorbank Ovarian Cancer Network, Charité, Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität Zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, 10117, Berlin, Germany
- Department of Gynecology, European Competence Center for Ovarian Cancer, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität Zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, 10117, Berlin, Germany
| | - Ioana Elena Braicu
- Tumorbank Ovarian Cancer Network, Charité, Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität Zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, 10117, Berlin, Germany
- Department of Gynecology, European Competence Center for Ovarian Cancer, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität Zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, 10117, Berlin, Germany
| | - Christina Westhoff
- Institute of Pathology, Philipps-University Marburg, University Hospital Marburg (UKGM), Marburg, Germany
| | - David Horst
- Institute of Pathology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität Zu Berlin, CCM, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany
| | - Carsten Denkert
- Institute of Pathology, Philipps-University Marburg, University Hospital Marburg (UKGM), Marburg, Germany
| | | | - Eliane T Taube
- Institute of Pathology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität Zu Berlin, CCM, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
McVeigh TP, Sweeney KJ, Brennan DJ, McVeigh UM, Ward S, Strydom A, Seal S, Astbury K, Donnellan P, Higgins J, Keane M, Kerin MJ, Malone C, McGough P, McLaughlin R, O'Leary M, Rushe M, Barry MK, MacGregor G, Sugrue M, Yousif A, Al-Azawi D, Berkeley E, Boyle TJ, Connolly EM, Nolan C, Richardson E, Giffney C, Doyle SB, Broderick S, Boyd W, McVey R, Walsh T, Farrell M, Gallagher DJ, Rahman N, George AJ. A pilot study investigating feasibility of mainstreaming germline BRCA1 and BRCA2 testing in high-risk patients with breast and/or ovarian cancer in three tertiary Cancer Centres in Ireland. Fam Cancer 2023; 22:135-149. [PMID: 36029389 DOI: 10.1007/s10689-022-00313-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2022] [Accepted: 08/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
In the Republic of Ireland (ROI), BRCA1/BRCA2 genetic testing has been traditionally undertaken in eligible individuals, after pre-test counselling by a Clinical Geneticist/Genetic Counsellor. Clinical Genetics services in ROI are poorly resourced, with routine waiting times for appointments at the time of this pilot often extending beyond a year. The consequent prolonged waiting times are unacceptable where therapeutic decision-making depends on the patient's BRCA status. "Mainstreaming" BRCA1/BRCA2 testing through routine oncology/surgical clinics has been implemented successfully in other centres in the UK and internationally. We aimed to pilot this pathway in three Irish tertiary centres. A service evaluation project was undertaken over a 6-month period between January and July 2017. Eligible patients, fulfilling pathology and age-based inclusion criteria defined by TGL clinical, were identified, and offered constitutional BRCA1/BRCA2 testing after pre-test counselling by treating clinicians. Tests were undertaken by TGL Clinical. Results were returned to clinicians by secure email. Onward referrals of patients with uncertain/pathogenic results, or suspicious family histories, to Clinical Genetics were made by the treating team. Surveys assessing patient and clinician satisfaction were sent to participating clinicians and a sample of participating patients. Data was collected with respect to diagnostic yield, turnaround time, onward referral rates, and patient and clinician feedback. A total of 101 patients underwent diagnostic germline BRCA1/BRCA2 tests through this pathway. Pathogenic variants were identified in 12 patients (12%). All patients in whom variants were identified were appropriately referred to Clinical Genetics. At least 12 additional patients with uninformative BRCA1/BRCA2 tests were also referred for formal assessment by Clinical Geneticist or Genetic Counsellor. Issues were noted in terms of time pressures and communication of results to patients. Results from a representative sample of participants completing the satisfaction survey indicated that the pathway was acceptable to patients and clinicians. Mainstreaming of constitutional BRCA1/BRCA2 testing guided by age- and pathology-based criteria is potentially feasible for patients with breast cancer as well as patients with ovarian cancer in Ireland.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Terri Patricia McVeigh
- Cancer Genetics Unit, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
| | - Karl J Sweeney
- Saolta Health Care Group, Galway University Hospital, Galway, Ireland
| | - Donal J Brennan
- Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
- The National Maternity Hospital, Holles St, Dublin, Ireland
| | | | - Simon Ward
- Cancer Genetics Unit, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | | | | | - Katherine Astbury
- Saolta Health Care Group, Galway University Hospital, Galway, Ireland
| | - Paul Donnellan
- Saolta Health Care Group, Galway University Hospital, Galway, Ireland
| | - Joanne Higgins
- Saolta Health Care Group, Galway University Hospital, Galway, Ireland
| | - Maccon Keane
- Saolta Health Care Group, Galway University Hospital, Galway, Ireland
| | - Michael J Kerin
- Saolta Health Care Group, Galway University Hospital, Galway, Ireland
- National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland
| | - Carmel Malone
- Saolta Health Care Group, Galway University Hospital, Galway, Ireland
- National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland
| | - Pauline McGough
- Saolta Health Care Group, Galway University Hospital, Galway, Ireland
| | - Ray McLaughlin
- Saolta Health Care Group, Galway University Hospital, Galway, Ireland
| | - Michael O'Leary
- Saolta Health Care Group, Galway University Hospital, Galway, Ireland
| | - Margaret Rushe
- Saolta Health Care Group, Galway University Hospital, Galway, Ireland
| | - Michael Kevin Barry
- Saolta Health Care Group, Mayo University Hospital, Co Mayo, Castlebar, Ireland
| | - Geraldine MacGregor
- Saolta University Health Care Group, Letterkenny University Hospital, Co Donegal, Letterkenny, Ireland
| | - Michael Sugrue
- Saolta University Health Care Group, Letterkenny University Hospital, Co Donegal, Letterkenny, Ireland
| | - Ala Yousif
- Saolta University Hospital Group, Sligo University Hospital, Sligo, Ireland
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - William Boyd
- Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Ruaidhri McVey
- Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Thomas Walsh
- Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | | | - David J Gallagher
- St James's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
- Mater Private Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | | | - Angela J George
- Cancer Genetics Unit, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Morgan RD, Burghel GJ, Flaum N, Bulman M, Smith P, Clamp AR, Hasan J, Mitchell CL, Salih Z, Woodward ER, Lalloo F, Crosbie EJ, Edmondson RJ, Schlecht H, Jayson GC, Evans DGR. Is Reflex Germline BRCA1/2 Testing Necessary in Women Diagnosed with Non-Mucinous High-Grade Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Aged 80 Years or Older? Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:730. [PMID: 36765687 PMCID: PMC9913244 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15030730] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2022] [Revised: 01/21/2023] [Accepted: 01/23/2023] [Indexed: 01/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Women diagnosed with non-mucinous high-grade epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) in England are often reflex-tested for germline and tumour BRCA1/2 variants. The value of germline BRCA1/2 testing in women diagnosed aged ≥80 is questionable. We performed an observational study of all women diagnosed with non-mucinous high-grade EOC who underwent germline and tumour BRCA1/2 testing by the North West of England Genomic Laboratory Hub. A subgroup of women also underwent germline testing using a panel of homologous recombination repair (HRR) genes and/or tumour testing for homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) using Myriad's myChoice® companion diagnostic. Seven-hundred-two patients successfully underwent both germline and tumour BRCA1/2 testing. Of these, 48 were diagnosed with non-mucinous high-grade EOC aged ≥80. In this age group, somatic BRCA1/2 pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants (PV/LPVs) were detected nine times more often than germline BRCA1/2 PV/LPVs. The only germline PV reported in a patient aged ≥80 was detected in germline and tumour DNA (BRCA2 c.4478_4481del). No patient aged ≥80 had a germline PV/LPVs in a non-BRCA1/2 HRR gene. Thirty-eight percent of patients aged ≥80 had a tumour positive for HRD. Our data suggest that tumour BRCA1/2 and HRD testing is adequate for patients diagnosed with non-mucinous high-grade EOC aged ≥80, with germline BRCA1/2 testing reserved for women with a tumour BRCA1/2 PV/LPVs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert D. Morgan
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Wilmslow Road, Manchester M20 4BX, UK
- Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK
| | - George J. Burghel
- Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, North West Genomic Laboratory Hub, Saint Mary’s Hospital, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9WL, UK
| | - Nicola Flaum
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Wilmslow Road, Manchester M20 4BX, UK
- Division of Evolution and Genomic Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK
| | - Michael Bulman
- Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, North West Genomic Laboratory Hub, Saint Mary’s Hospital, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9WL, UK
| | - Philip Smith
- Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, North West Genomic Laboratory Hub, Saint Mary’s Hospital, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9WL, UK
| | - Andrew R. Clamp
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Wilmslow Road, Manchester M20 4BX, UK
- Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK
| | - Jurjees Hasan
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Wilmslow Road, Manchester M20 4BX, UK
| | - Claire L. Mitchell
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Wilmslow Road, Manchester M20 4BX, UK
| | - Zena Salih
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Wilmslow Road, Manchester M20 4BX, UK
| | - Emma R. Woodward
- Division of Evolution and Genomic Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Saint Mary’s Hospital, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9WL, UK
| | - Fiona Lalloo
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Saint Mary’s Hospital, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9WL, UK
| | - Emma J. Crosbie
- Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Saint Mary’s Hospital, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9WL, UK
| | - Richard J. Edmondson
- Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Saint Mary’s Hospital, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9WL, UK
| | - Helene Schlecht
- Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, North West Genomic Laboratory Hub, Saint Mary’s Hospital, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9WL, UK
| | - Gordon C. Jayson
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Wilmslow Road, Manchester M20 4BX, UK
- Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK
| | - D. Gareth R. Evans
- Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, North West Genomic Laboratory Hub, Saint Mary’s Hospital, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9WL, UK
- Division of Evolution and Genomic Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Saint Mary’s Hospital, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9WL, UK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Tinker AV, Altman AD, Bernardini MQ, Ghatage P, Gien LT, Provencher D, Salvador S, Doucette S, Oza AM. A Pan-Canadian Consensus Statement on First-Line PARP Inhibitor Maintenance for Advanced, High-Grade Serous and Endometrioid Tubal, Ovarian, and Primary Peritoneal Cancers. Curr Oncol 2022; 29:4354-4369. [PMID: 35735457 PMCID: PMC9221681 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol29060348] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2022] [Revised: 05/26/2022] [Accepted: 05/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
The majority of patients with advanced, high-grade epithelial-tubo ovarian cancer (EOC) respond well to initial treatment with platinum-based chemotherapy; however, up to 80% of patients will experience a recurrence. Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase (PARP) inhibitors have been established as a standard of care maintenance therapy to prolong remission and prevent relapse following a response to first-line platinum-chemotherapy. Olaparib and niraparib are the PARP inhibitors currently approved for use in the first-line maintenance setting in Canada. Selection of maintenance therapy requires consideration of patient and tumour factors, presence of germline and somatic mutations, expected drug toxicity profile, and treatment access. This paper discusses the current clinical evidence for first-line PARP inhibitor maintenance therapy in patients with advanced, high-grade EOC and presents consensus statements and a treatment algorithm to aid Canadian oncologists on the selection and use of PARP inhibitors within the Canadian EOC treatment landscape.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna V. Tinker
- Division of Medical Oncology, BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC V5Z 4E6, Canada;
- Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada
| | - Alon D. Altman
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Cancer Care Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB R3E 0V9, Canada;
- Department of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB R3A 1R9, Canada
| | - Marcus Q. Bernardini
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University Health Network, Sinai Health System, Toronto, ON M5B 2M9, Canada;
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5G 1X8, Canada;
| | - Prafull Ghatage
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Tom Baker Cancer Centre, Calgary, AB T2N 4N2, Canada;
- Department of Gynecological Oncology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada
| | - Lilian T. Gien
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5G 1X8, Canada;
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada
| | - Diane Provencher
- Institut du Cancer de Montréal, Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal (CHUM), Montreal, QC H2X 0A9, Canada;
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC H3T 1J4, Canada
| | - Shannon Salvador
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, McGill University Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC H3T 1E2, Canada;
| | | | - Amit M. Oza
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5G 1X8, Canada;
- Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON M5G 2C1, Canada
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Tumor BRCA Testing in Epithelial Ovarian Cancers: Past and Future-Five-Years' Single-Institution Experience of 762 Consecutive Patients. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14071638. [PMID: 35406410 PMCID: PMC8996829 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14071638] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2022] [Revised: 03/04/2022] [Accepted: 03/16/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Tumor BRCA testing is crucial in the clinical management of women affected by epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). In the present study, we aimed to report the results of five years of experience in tumor BRCA testing performed in a single-institution diagnostic setting. We profiled 762 consecutive EOC patients with a failure rate of less than 1% and less than two weeks of turnaround time, which is consistent with the clinical needs. We identified 23.4% of cases with pathogenic/likely pathogenic mutations, including 76% of patients affected by germline and 24% by somatic alterations. Here, we proposed a comprehensive and multidisciplinary clinical workflow that could be successfully followed for the identification of somatic as well as germline alterations, maximizing the benefit of BRCA testing both from a therapeutic and risk assessment perspective. Abstract The establishment of PARP inhibitors in the treatment of epithelial ovarian carcinoma (EOC) has prompt BRCA assessment at the time of diagnosis. We described our five years of experience of tumor BRCA testing, as part of a multidisciplinary workflow for the management of EOC patients. We used a BRCA next-generation sequencing (NGS) test for profiling formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) EOCs of 762 consecutive patients, with a success rate of 99.7% and a median turnaround time of 12 days. We found 178 (23.4%) cases with pathogenic/likely pathogenic (P/LP) mutations, 74 (9.7%) cases with variants of uncertain significance and 508 (66.8%) wild type tumors. Among 174 patients without P/LP mutations and investigated with multiple-ligation probe-amplification analysis on peripheral blood, two (1.1%) were positive for large rearrangements. Patients with P/LP alterations and/or with positive family history were referred to genetic counselling. Comparing tumor and blood NGS test results of 256 patients, we obtained a tumor test negative predictive value of 100% and we defined 76% of P/LP alterations as germline and 24% as somatic variants. The proposed workflow may successfully identify EOC patients with BRCA1/2 alteration, guiding both therapeutic and risk assessment clinical decisions.
Collapse
|