Trends in survival of epithelial ovarian/tubal cancer by histology and socioeconomic status in Denmark 1996-2017

Time to Diagnosis and Treatment for Ovarian Cancer and Associations with Outcomes: A Systematic Review

Background: Ovarian cancer is commonly diagnosed symptomatically at an advanced stage. Better survival for early disease suggests improving diagnostic pathways may increase survival. This study examines literature assessing diagnostic intervals and their association with clinical and psychological outcomes. Methods: Medline, EMBASE, and EmCare databases were searched for studies including quantitative measures of at least one interval, published between January 1, 2000 and August 9, 2022. Interval measures and associations (interval, outcomes, analytic strategy) were synthesized. Risk of bias of association studies was assessed using the Aarhus Checklist and ROBINS-E tool. Results: In total, 65 papers (20 association studies) were included and 26 unique intervals were identified. Interval estimates varied widely and were impacted by summary statistic used (mean or median) and group focused on. Of Aarhus-defined intervals, patient (symptom to presentation, n = 23; range [median]: 7-168 days) and diagnostic (presentation to diagnosis, n = 22; range [median]: 7-270 days) were most common. Nineteen association studies examined survival or stage outcomes with most, including five low risk-of-bias studies, finding no association. Conclusions: Studies reporting intervals for ovarian cancer diagnosis are limited by inconsistent definitions and reporting. Greater utilization of the Aarhus statement to define intervals and appropriate analytic methods is needed to strengthen findings from future studies.

Prediagnostic use of menopausal hormone therapy and long-term survival of localized epithelial ovarian cancer: The Extreme study

Use of menopausal hormone therapy (MHT) prior to an epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) diagnosis has been suggested to be associated with improved survival. In a recent nationwide cohort study, we found that prediagnostic long-term MHT use, especially estrogen therapy (ET), was associated with improved long-term survival in women with nonlocalized EOC. Our aim was to investigate the influence of prediagnostic MHT use on long-term survival among women with localized EOC in the same nationwide study. Our study cohort comprised all women aged 50 years or older with an EOC diagnosis in Denmark 2000-2014 (n = 2097) identified from the Extreme study. We collected information on usage of systemic ET and estrogen plus progestin therapy (EPT) from the Danish National Prescription Registry. By using pseudo-values, 5- and 10-year absolute and relative survival probabilities were estimated with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) while adjusting for histology, comorbidity, and income. Relative survival probabilities >1 indicate better survival. The 5-year absolute survival probabilities were 61% and 56%, respectively, among women who were nonusers and users of prediagnostic MHT, whereas these numbers were 46% and 41%, respectively, regarding 10-year survival. Use of MHT was not significantly associated with an improved 5- or 10-year survival in women with localized EOC (5-year relative survival probability = 0.95, 95% CI: 0.89-1.02; 10-year relative survival probability = 0.92, 95% CI: 0.84-1.02). Similar findings were seen for systemic ET or EPT use. Our findings do not suggest a positive benefit from prediagnostic MHT use on long-term survival of localized EOC.

Niraparib maintenance therapy using an individualised starting dose in patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer (NORA): final overall survival analysis of a phase 3 randomised, placebo-controlled trial

Background

Niraparib significantly prolonged progression-free survival versus placebo in patients with platinum-sensitive, recurrent ovarian cancer (PSROC), regardless of germline BRCA mutation (gBRCAm) status, in NORA. This analysis reports final data on overall survival (OS).

Methods

This randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial enrolled patients across 30 centres in China between 26 September 2017 and 2 February 2019 (clinicaltrials.gov, NCT03705156). Eligible patients had histologically confirmed, recurrent, (predominantly) high-grade serous epithelial ovarian cancer, fallopian tube carcinoma, or primary peritoneal carcinoma (no histological restrictions for those with gBRCAm) and had received ≥2 prior lines of platinum-based chemotherapy. Patients were randomised (2:1) to receive niraparib or placebo, with stratification by gBRCAm status, time to recurrence following penultimate platinum-based chemotherapy, and response to last platinum-based chemotherapy. Following a protocol amendment, the starting dose was individualised: 200 mg/day for patients with bodyweight <77 kg and/or platelet count <150 × 103/μL at baseline and 300 mg/day otherwise. OS was a secondary endpoint.

Findings

Totally, 265 patients were randomised to receive niraparib (n = 177) or placebo (n = 88), and 249 (94.0%) received an individualised starting dose. As of 14 August 2023, median follow-up for OS was 57.9 months (IQR, 54.8-61.6). Median OS (95% CI) with niraparib versus placebo was 51.5 (41.4-58.9) versus 47.6 (33.3-not evaluable [NE]) months, with hazard ratio [HR] of 0.86 (95% CI, 0.60-1.23), in the overall population; 56.0 (36.1-NE) versus 47.6 (31.6-NE) months, with HR of 0.86 (95% CI, 0.46-1.58), in patients with gBRCAm; and 46.5 (41.0-NE) versus 46.9 (31.8-NE) months, with HR of 0.87 (95% CI, 0.56-1.35), in those without. No new safety signals were identified, and myelodysplastic syndromes/acute myeloid leukaemia occurred in three (1.7%) niraparib-treated patients.

Interpretation

Niraparib maintenance therapy with an individualised starting dose demonstrated a favourable OS trend versus placebo in PSROC patients, regardless of gBRCAm status.

Funding

Zai Lab (Shanghai) Co., Ltd; National Major Scientific and Technological Special Project for "Significant New Drugs Development" in 2018, China [grant number 2018ZX09736019].

Trends in survival of ovarian clear cell carcinoma patients from 2000 to 2015

Purpose

To analyze changes in survival outcomes in patients with ovarian clear cell carcinoma (OCCC) treated consecutively over a 16-year period using a population-based cohort.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective analysis of OCCC from 2000 to 2015 using data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program. The ovarian cancer-specific survival (OCSS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed according to the year of diagnosis. Joinpoint Regression Program, Kaplan-Meier analysis, and multivariate Cox regression analyses were used for statistical analysis.

Results

We included 4257 patients in the analysis. The analysis of annual percentage change in OCSS (P=0.014) and OS (P=0.006) showed that patients diagnosed in later years had significantly better outcomes compared to those diagnosed in early years. The results of the multivariate Cox regression analyses showed that the year of diagnosis was the independent prognostic factor associated with OCSS (P=0.004) and had a borderline effect on OS (P=0.060). Regarding the SEER staging, the OCSS (P=0.017) and OS (P=0.004) of patients with distant stage showed a significant trend toward increased, while no significant trends were found in the survival of patients with localized or regional stage diseases. Similar trends were found in those aged <65 years or those treated with surgery and chemotherapy. However, no statistically significant changes in the survival rate were found in those aged ≥65 years or those receiving surgery alone regardless of SEER stage during the study period.

Conclusions

Our study observed a significant increase in the survival outcomes in OCCC from 2000 to 2015, and patients aged <65 years and those with distant stage experienced a greater improvement in survival.

History of autoimmune disease and long-term survival of epithelial ovarian cancer: The extreme study

OBJECTIVE

Patients with autoimmune disease may have impaired cancer survival. The aim was to investigate the association between autoimmune disease and ovarian cancer survival.

METHODS

From the Extreme study, we included women diagnosed with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) in Denmark during 1990-2014 (n = 11,870). Information on exposure and covariates was retrieved from nationwide registries. Using pseudo-values, we estimated absolute and relative 5- and 10-year survival probabilities with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for autoimmune diseases combined and for the four most common individual disorders in our study population, namely type 1 diabetes, rheumatoid arthritis, Graves' disease, and inflammatory bowel disease.

RESULTS

The overall 5- and 10-year absolute survival probabilities were 35% and 24%, respectively, in women with EOC without autoimmune disease. Autoimmune diseases combined was not significantly associated with survival among women with EOC (5-year adjusted relative survival probability = 1.01, 95% CI: 0.94-1.09; 10-year adjusted relative survival probability = 0.90, 95% CI: 0.81-1.00). However, stratification by disease stage showed an impaired 10-year survival in women with autoimmune disease and a localized EOC (relative survival probability = 0.86, 95% CI: 0.76-0.97). None of the individual autoimmune diseases were statistically significantly associated with EOC survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Only among women with localized EOC, there seemed to be a long-term survival loss associated with a history of autoimmune disease. In contrast, no significant association between a history of autoimmune disease and survival was observed in women with nonlocalized EOC where the survival is already low.

Long-term survival of non-localized epithelial ovarian cancer among women using menopausal hormone therapy prior to diagnosis - the Extreme study

Prediagnostic use of menopausal hormone therapy (MHT) has been suggested to be associated with improved survival of epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). We investigated the potential long‐term survival benefit of prediagnostic MHT use in women ≥50 years with nonlocalized EOC using the Extreme study including all women in Denmark registered with nonlocalized EOC during 2000 to 2014 (N = 3776). We obtained individual‐level information on prediagnostic use of systemic estrogen therapy (ET) and estrogen plus progestin therapy (EPT) from the National Prescription Registry and estimated absolute and relative 5‐ and 10‐year survival probabilities with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using pseudo‐values, taking into account histology, comorbidity, income and residual disease. Among women not having used prediagnostic MHT, 5‐ and 10‐year absolute survival probabilities were 19% and 11%, respectively. Compared to MHT nonusers, prediagnostic systemic ET use for 3 to 4 years and ≥ 5 years was associated with 1.43 (95% CI: 1.01‐2.02) and 1.22 (95% CI: 0.96‐1.55) times higher 5‐year survival probabilities, respectively. Ten‐year survival probabilities were also increased but not statistically significantly. Among prediagnostic EPT users, increased 5‐year (1.14, 95% CI: 0.85‐1.53) and 10‐year (1.38, 95% CI: 0.91‐2.08) survival probabilities were observed after use for 3 to 4 years compared to MHT nonuse, whereas EPT use for ≥5 years was not associated with long‐term survival of nonlocalized EOC. Our findings may suggest a better long‐term survival of nonlocalized EOC in women having used long‐term prediagnostic ET. However, the statistical precision of our results did not allow firm conclusions and more studies are needed.