1
|
Wada M, Yamagami W. Immunotherapy for endometrial cancer. Int J Clin Oncol 2024:10.1007/s10147-024-02568-2. [PMID: 38913219 DOI: 10.1007/s10147-024-02568-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/24/2023] [Accepted: 06/03/2024] [Indexed: 06/25/2024]
Abstract
Advanced recurrent endometrial cancer (EC) has a poor prognosis and new treatment options are needed. In 2013, EC was classified by genomic analysis into four groups: the POLE ultra-mutated group, the MSI-high hypermutated group (MSI-H), the copy number low group, and the copy number high group. The prognosis differs based on the classification, which should enable the individualization of treatment. The MSI-H and POLE types can induce PD-L1 expression in cancer cells. Among the gynecological cancers, EC exhibits the highest levels of PD-1 and PD-L1 expression and has the highest proportion of MSI-H. Thus, an immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) is expected to be effective. The first ICI to show efficacy in recurrent EC was the anti-PD1 antibody pembrolizumab, which exhibited efficacy in MSI-H EC. The combination of pembrolizumab and the multi-kinase inhibitor lenvatinib significantly prolongs OS/PFS compared with single-agent chemotherapy in previously treated recurrent EC, regardless of MSI status. ICIs are now moving from second-line and beyond to first-line treatment regimens. The efficacy of paclitaxel plus carboplatin (TC) and ICI combinations compared with TC have been demonstrated, including an ongoing Phase III trial comparing chemotherapy with the combination of pembrolizumab and lenvatinib. Although ICIs are becoming the mainstay of EC, they cause systemic inflammatory side effects known as irAEs. The incidence of irAEs is higher for combination therapy with CT or lenvatinib compared with ICI therapy alone. Even though they are rarely fatal, irAEs should be addressed promptly.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michiko Wada
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Keio University School of Medicine, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjyuku-Ku, Tokyo, 160-8582, Japan.
| | - Wataru Yamagami
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Keio University School of Medicine, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjyuku-Ku, Tokyo, 160-8582, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Liu YL, Gordhandas S, Arora K, Rios-Doria E, Cadoo KA, Catchings A, Maio A, Kemel Y, Sheehan M, Salo-Mullen E, Zhou Q, Iasonos A, Carrot-Zhang J, Manning-Geist B, Sia TY, Selenica P, Vanderbilt C, Misyura M, Latham A, Bandlamudi C, Berger MF, Hamilton JG, Makker V, Abu-Rustum NR, Ellenson LH, Offit K, Mandelker DL, Stadler Z, Weigelt B, Aghajanian C, Brown C. Pathogenic germline variants in patients with endometrial cancer of diverse ancestry. Cancer 2024; 130:576-587. [PMID: 37886874 PMCID: PMC10922155 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.35071] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2023] [Revised: 08/04/2023] [Accepted: 08/10/2023] [Indexed: 10/28/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Racial disparities in outcomes exist in endometrial cancer (EC). The contribution of ancestry-based variations in germline pathogenic variants (gPVs) is unknown. METHODS Germline assessment of ≥76 cancer predisposition genes was performed in patients with EC undergoing tumor-normal Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center Integrated Mutation Profiling of Actionable Cancer Targets sequencing from January 1, 2015 through June 30, 2021. Self-reported race/ethnicity and Ashkenazi Jewish ancestry data classified patients into groups. Genetic ancestry was inferred from Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center Integrated Mutation Profiling of Actionable Cancer Targets. Rates of gPV and genetic counseling were compared by ancestry. RESULTS Among 1625 patients with EC, 216 (13%) had gPVs; 15 had >1 gPV. Rates of gPV varied by self-reported ancestry (Ashkenazi Jewish, 40/202 [20%]; Asian, 15/124 [12%]; Black/African American (AA), 12/171 [7.0%]; Hispanic, 15/124 [12%]; non-Hispanic (NH) White, 129/927 [14%]; missing, 5/77 [6.5%]; p = .009], with similar findings by genetic ancestry (p < .001). We observed a lower likelihood of gPVs in patients of Black/AA (odds ratio [OR], 0.44; 95% CI, 0.22-0.81) and African (AFR) ancestry (OR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.18-0.85) and a higher likelihood in patients of Ashkenazi Jewish genetic ancestry (OR, 1.62; 95% CI; 1.11-2.34) compared with patients of non-Hispanic White/European ancestry, even after adjustment for age and molecular subtype. Somatic landscape influenced gPVs with lower rates of microsatellite instability-high tumors in patients of Black/AA and AFR ancestry. Among those with newly identified gPVs (n = 114), 102 (89%) were seen for genetic counseling, with lowest rates among Black/AA (75%) and AFR patients (67%). CONCLUSIONS In those with EC, gPV and genetic counseling varied by ancestry, with lowest rates among Black/AA and AFR patients, potentially contributing to disparities in outcomes given implications for treatment and cancer prevention. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY Black women with endometrial cancer do worse than White women, and there are many reasons for this disparity. Certain genetic changes from birth (mutations) can increase the risk of cancer, and it is unknown if rates of these changes are different between different ancestry groups. Genetic mutations in 1625 diverse women with endometrial cancer were studied and the lowest rates of mutations and genetic counseling were found in Black and African ancestry women. This could affect their treatment options as well as their families and may make disparities worse.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ying L Liu
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA
| | - Sushmita Gordhandas
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Kanika Arora
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Eric Rios-Doria
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Karen A Cadoo
- St. James's Hospital, Trinity St. James's Cancer Institute, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Amanda Catchings
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Anna Maio
- Sloan Kettering Institute, New York, New York, USA
| | - Yelena Kemel
- Sloan Kettering Institute, New York, New York, USA
| | - Margaret Sheehan
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Erin Salo-Mullen
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Qin Zhou
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Alexia Iasonos
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Jian Carrot-Zhang
- Department of Computational Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Beryl Manning-Geist
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Tiffany Y Sia
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Pier Selenica
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Chad Vanderbilt
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Maksym Misyura
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Alicia Latham
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA
| | - Chaitanya Bandlamudi
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Michael F Berger
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Jada G Hamilton
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA
| | - Vicky Makker
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA
| | - Nadeem R Abu-Rustum
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA
| | - Lora H Ellenson
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Kenneth Offit
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA
| | - Diana L Mandelker
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Zsofia Stadler
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA
| | - Britta Weigelt
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Carol Aghajanian
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA
| | - Carol Brown
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kral J, Jelinkova S, Zemankova P, Vocka M, Borecka M, Cerna L, Cerna M, Dostalek L, Duskova P, Foretova L, Havranek O, Horackova K, Hovhannisyan M, Chvojka S, Kalousova M, Kosarova M, Koudova M, Krutilkova V, Machackova E, Nehasil P, Novotny J, Otahalova B, Puchmajerova A, Safarikova M, Slama J, Stranecky V, Subrt I, Tavandzis S, Zikan M, Zima T, Soukupova J, Kleiblova P, Kleibl Z, Janatova M. Germline multigene panel testing of patients with endometrial cancer. Oncol Lett 2023; 25:216. [PMID: 37153042 PMCID: PMC10157349 DOI: 10.3892/ol.2023.13802] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2022] [Accepted: 03/03/2023] [Indexed: 05/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Endometrial cancer (EC) is the most common gynecological malignancy in developed countries. The present study aimed to determine the frequency of germline pathogenic variants (PV) in patients with EC. In this multicenter retrospective cohort study, germline genetic testing (GGT) was performed in 527 patients with EC using a next generation sequencing panel targeting 226 genes, including 5 Lynch syndrome (LS) and 14 hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC) predisposition genes, and 207 candidate predisposition genes. Gene-level risks were calculated using 1,662 population-matched controls (PMCs). Patients were sub-categorized to fulfill GGT criteria for LS, HBOC, both or none. A total of 60 patients (11.4%) carried PV in LS (5.1%) and HBOC (6.6%) predisposition genes, including two carriers of double PV. PV in LS genes conferred a significantly higher EC risk [odds ratio (OR), 22.4; 95% CI, 7.8-64.3; P=1.8×10-17] than the most frequently altered HBOC genes BRCA1 (OR, 3.9; 95% CI, 1.6-9.5; P=0.001), BRCA2 (OR, 7.4; 95% CI, 1.9-28.9; P=0.002) and CHEK2 (OR, 3.2; 95% CI, 1.0-9.9; P=0.04). Furthermore, >6% of patients with EC not fulfilling LS or HBOC GGT indication criteria carried a PV in a clinically relevant gene. Carriers of PV in LS genes had a significantly lower age of EC onset than non-carriers (P=0.01). Another 11.0% of patients carried PV in a candidate gene (the most frequent were FANCA and MUTYH); however, their individual frequencies did not differ from PMCs (except for aggregated frequency of loss-of-function variants in POLE/POLD1; OR, 10.44; 95% CI, 1.1-100.5; P=0.012). The present study demonstrated the importance of GGT in patients with EC. The increased risk of EC of PV carriers in HBOC genes suggests that the diagnosis of EC should be included in the HBOC GGT criteria.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jan Kral
- Institute of Medical Biochemistry and Laboratory Diagnostics, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague 120 00, Czech Republic
| | - Sandra Jelinkova
- Institute of Medical Biochemistry and Laboratory Diagnostics, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague 120 00, Czech Republic
| | - Petra Zemankova
- Institute of Medical Biochemistry and Laboratory Diagnostics, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague 120 00, Czech Republic
- Institute of Pathological Physiology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague 120 00, Czech Republic
| | - Michal Vocka
- Department of Oncology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague 120 00, Czech Republic
- Institute of Biology and Medical Genetics, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague 120 00, Czech Republic
| | - Marianna Borecka
- Institute of Medical Biochemistry and Laboratory Diagnostics, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague 120 00, Czech Republic
| | - Leona Cerna
- Center for Medical Genetics and Reproductive Medicine, Gennet, Prague 170 00, Czech Republic
| | - Marta Cerna
- Institute of Medical Biochemistry and Laboratory Diagnostics, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague 120 00, Czech Republic
| | - Lukas Dostalek
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague 120 00, Czech Republic
| | - Petra Duskova
- Laboratory of Molecular Genetics, Hospital Ceske Budejovice, Ceske Budejovice 370 00, Czech Republic
| | - Lenka Foretova
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Brno 656 53, Czech Republic
| | - Ondrej Havranek
- Institute of Biology and Medical Genetics, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague 120 00, Czech Republic
- BIOCEV (Biotechnology and Biomedicine Center of The Czech Academy of Sciences and Charles University), First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague 252 50, Czech Republic
| | - Klara Horackova
- Institute of Medical Biochemistry and Laboratory Diagnostics, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague 120 00, Czech Republic
| | - Milena Hovhannisyan
- Institute of Medical Biochemistry and Laboratory Diagnostics, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague 120 00, Czech Republic
| | - Stepan Chvojka
- Center for Medical Genetics and Reproductive Medicine, Gennet, Prague 170 00, Czech Republic
| | - Marta Kalousova
- Institute of Medical Biochemistry and Laboratory Diagnostics, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague 120 00, Czech Republic
| | - Marcela Kosarova
- Department of Medical Genetics, Pronatal, Prague 140 00, Czech Republic
| | - Monika Koudova
- Center for Medical Genetics and Reproductive Medicine, Gennet, Prague 170 00, Czech Republic
| | - Vera Krutilkova
- Department of Medical Genetics, AGEL Laboratories, AGEL Research and Training Institute, Novy Jicin 741 00, Czech Republic
| | - Eva Machackova
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Brno 656 53, Czech Republic
| | - Petr Nehasil
- Institute of Medical Biochemistry and Laboratory Diagnostics, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague 120 00, Czech Republic
- Institute of Pathological Physiology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague 120 00, Czech Republic
- Department of Paediatrics and Inherited Metabolic Disorders, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague 120 00, Czech Republic
| | - Jan Novotny
- Institute of Biology and Medical Genetics, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague 120 00, Czech Republic
| | - Barbora Otahalova
- Institute of Medical Biochemistry and Laboratory Diagnostics, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague 120 00, Czech Republic
- Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Prague 120 00, Czech Republic
| | - Alena Puchmajerova
- Center for Medical Genetics and Reproductive Medicine, Gennet, Prague 170 00, Czech Republic
| | - Marketa Safarikova
- Institute of Medical Biochemistry and Laboratory Diagnostics, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague 120 00, Czech Republic
| | - Jiri Slama
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague 120 00, Czech Republic
| | - Viktor Stranecky
- Department of Paediatrics and Inherited Metabolic Disorders, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague 120 00, Czech Republic
| | - Ivan Subrt
- Department of Medical Genetics, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University and University Hospital Pilsen, Pilsen 323 00, Czech Republic
| | - Spiros Tavandzis
- Department of Medical Genetics, AGEL Laboratories, AGEL Research and Training Institute, Novy Jicin 741 00, Czech Republic
| | - Michal Zikan
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Bulovka University Hospital and First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague 180 00, Czech Republic
| | - Tomas Zima
- Institute of Medical Biochemistry and Laboratory Diagnostics, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague 120 00, Czech Republic
| | - Jana Soukupova
- Institute of Medical Biochemistry and Laboratory Diagnostics, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague 120 00, Czech Republic
| | - Petra Kleiblova
- Institute of Medical Biochemistry and Laboratory Diagnostics, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague 120 00, Czech Republic
- Institute of Biology and Medical Genetics, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague 120 00, Czech Republic
| | - Zdenek Kleibl
- Institute of Medical Biochemistry and Laboratory Diagnostics, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague 120 00, Czech Republic
- Institute of Pathological Physiology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague 120 00, Czech Republic
| | - Marketa Janatova
- Institute of Medical Biochemistry and Laboratory Diagnostics, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague 120 00, Czech Republic
- Correspondence to: Dr Marketa Janatova, Institute of Medical Biochemistry and Laboratory Diagnostics, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Katerinska 1660/32, Prague 120 00, Czech Republic, E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Gordhandas S, Rios-Doria E, Cadoo KA, Catchings A, Maio A, Kemel Y, Sheehan M, Ranganathan M, Green D, Aryamvally A, Arnold AG, Salo-Mullen E, Manning-Geist B, Sia T, Selenica P, Da Cruz Paula A, Vanderbilt C, Misyura M, Leitao MM, Mueller JJ, Makker V, Rubinstein M, Friedman CF, Zhou Q, Iasonos A, Latham A, Carlo MI, Murciano-Goroff YR, Will M, Walsh MF, Issa Bhaloo S, Ellenson LH, Ceyhan-Birsoy O, Berger MF, Robson ME, Abu-Rustum N, Aghajanian C, Offit K, Stadler Z, Weigelt B, Mandelker DL, Liu YL. Comprehensive analysis of germline drivers in endometrial cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 2023; 115:560-569. [PMID: 36744932 PMCID: PMC10165491 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djad016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2022] [Revised: 12/12/2022] [Accepted: 01/23/2023] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND We sought to determine the prevalence of germline pathogenic variants (gPVs) in unselected patients with endometrial cancer (EC), define biallelic gPVs within tumors, and describe their associations with clinicopathologic features. METHODS Germline assessment of at least 76 cancer predisposition genes was performed in patients with EC undergoing clinical tumor-normal Memorial Sloan Kettering-Integrated Mutation Profiling of Actionable Cancer Targets (MSK-IMPACT) sequencing from January 1, 2015, to June 30, 2021. In patients with gPVs, biallelic alterations in ECs were identified through analysis of loss of heterozygosity and somatic PVs. Clinicopathologic variables were compared using nonparametric tests. RESULTS Of 1625 patients with EC, 216 (13%) had gPVs, and 15 patients had 2 gPVs. There were 231 gPVs in 35 genes (75 [32%] high penetrance; 39 [17%] moderate penetrance; and 117 [51%] low, recessive, or uncertain penetrance). Compared with those without gPVs, patients with gPVs were younger (P = .002), more often White (P = .009), and less obese (P = .025) and had differences in distribution of tumor histology (P = .017) and molecular subtype (P < .001). Among 231 gPVs, 74 (32%) exhibited biallelic inactivation within tumors. For high-penetrance gPVs, 63% (47 of 75) of ECs had biallelic alterations, primarily affecting mismatch repair (MMR) and homologous recombination related genes, including BRCA1,BRCA2, RAD51D, and PALB2. Biallelic inactivation varied across molecular subtypes with highest rates in microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) or copy-number (CN)-high subtypes (3 of 12 [25%] POLE, 30 of 77 [39%] MSI-H, 27 of 60 [45%] CN-high, 9 of 57 [16%] CN-low; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS Of unselected patients with EC, 13% had gPVs, with 63% of gPVs in high-penetrance genes (MMR and homologous recombination) exhibiting biallelic inactivation, potentially driving cancer development. This supports germline assessment in EC given implications for treatment and cancer prevention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sushmita Gordhandas
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Eric Rios-Doria
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Karen A Cadoo
- St. James’s Hospital, Trinity St. James’s Cancer Institute, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Amanda Catchings
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Anna Maio
- Sloan Kettering Institute, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Margaret Sheehan
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Megha Ranganathan
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Dina Green
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Anjali Aryamvally
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Angela G Arnold
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Erin Salo-Mullen
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Beryl Manning-Geist
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Tiffany Sia
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Pier Selenica
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Arnaud Da Cruz Paula
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Chad Vanderbilt
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Maksym Misyura
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Mario M Leitao
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jennifer J Mueller
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Vicky Makker
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Maria Rubinstein
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Claire F Friedman
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Qin Zhou
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Alexia Iasonos
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Alicia Latham
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Maria I Carlo
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Yonina R Murciano-Goroff
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Marie Will
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Michael F Walsh
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Shirin Issa Bhaloo
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Lora H Ellenson
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Ozge Ceyhan-Birsoy
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Michael F Berger
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Mark E Robson
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Nadeem Abu-Rustum
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Carol Aghajanian
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Kenneth Offit
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Zsofia Stadler
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Britta Weigelt
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Diana L Mandelker
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Ying L Liu
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Karpel H, Manderski E, Pothuri B. Frequency of actionable germline pathogenic variants identified through tumor next-generation sequencing in a gynecologic cancer cohort. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2023:ijgc-2022-004142. [PMID: 36889816 DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2022-004142] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/10/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Tumor next-generation sequencing can identify potential germline pathogenic variants associated with cancer susceptibility. OBJECTIVE To describe the frequency of tumor sequencing results that met European Society of Medical Oncology (ESMO) recommendations for further germline genetic testing, and the frequency of germline variants among a cohort with gynecologic cancer. METHODS Patients with gynecologic cancer who underwent tumor sequencing between September 2019 and February 2022 in a large healthcare system in New York City were retrospectively identified. Eligible patients with suspected germline pathogenic variants on tumor sequencing were identified based on ESMO guidelines. Logistic regression was used to explore variables associated with referral and completion of germline testing. RESULTS Of 358 patients with gynecologic cancers who underwent tumor sequencing, 81 (22.6%) had ≥1 suspected germline variant according to ESMO guidelines. Of the 81 patients with qualifying tumor sequencing results, 56 (69.1%) received germline testing: 41/46 (89.1%) eligible patients with ovarian cancer and 15/33 (45.5%) with endometrial cancer. In the endometrial cancer cohort, 11/33 (33.3%) eligible patients were not referred for germline testing and the majority of these patients had tumor variants in genes commonly known to cause hereditary cancer. Of the 56 patients who underwent germline testing, 40 (71.4%) had pathogenic germline variants. In multivariable analysis, race/ethnicity other than non-Hispanic white was associated with lower odds of germline testing referral and completion (OR=0.1, 95% CI 0.01 to 0.5 and OR=0.2, 95% CI 0.04 to 0.6, respectively). CONCLUSION Given the high rate of pathogenic germline variant detection and the importance of identifying such variants for both patients and their family, it is imperative that eligible patients undergo germline testing. Additional education for providers on multidisciplinary guidelines and development of clinical pathways to ensure germline testing of suspected pathogenic variants identified on tumor sequencing is warranted, especially in light of the racial/ethnic inequity observed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hannah Karpel
- New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | - Elizabeth Manderski
- Perlmutter Cancer Center, New York University Langone Health, New York, New York, USA
| | - Bhavana Pothuri
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Perlmutter Cancer Center, New York University Langone Health, New York, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Borja NA, Silva-Smith R, Huang M, Parekh DJ, Sussman D, Tekin M. Atypical ATMs: Broadening the phenotypic spectrum of ATM-associated hereditary cancer. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1068110. [PMID: 36865800 PMCID: PMC9971806 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1068110] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2022] [Accepted: 02/03/2023] [Indexed: 02/16/2023] Open
Abstract
Heterozygous, loss-of-function germline variants in ATM have been associated with an increased lifetime risk of breast, pancreas, prostate, stomach, ovarian, colorectal, and melanoma cancers. We conducted a retrospective review of thirty-one unrelated patients found to be heterozygous for a germline pathogenic variant in ATM and identified a significant proportion of patients in this cohort with cancers not currently associated with the ATM hereditary cancer syndrome, including carcinomas of the gallbladder, uterus, duodenum, kidney, and lung as well as a vascular sarcoma. A comprehensive review of the literature found 25 relevant studies where 171 individuals with a germline deleterious ATM variant have been diagnosed with the same or similar cancers. The combined data from these studies were then used to estimate the prevalence of germline ATM pathogenic variants in these cancers, which ranged between 0.45% and 2.2%. Analysis of tumor sequencing performed in large cohorts demonstrated that the frequency of deleterious somatic ATM alterations in these atypical cancers equaled or exceeded the alteration frequency in breast cancer and occurred at a significantly higher rate than in other DNA-damage response tumor suppressors, namely BRCA1 and CHEK2. Furthermore, multi-gene analysis of somatic alterations in these atypical cancers demonstrated significant co-occurrence of pathogenic alterations in ATM with BRCA1 and CHEK2, while there was significant mutual exclusivity between pathogenic alterations in ATM and TP53. This indicates that germline ATM pathogenic variants may play a role in cancer initiation and progression in these atypical ATM malignancies, potentially influencing these cancers to be driven toward DNA-damage repair deficiency and away from loss of TP53. As such, these findings provide evidence for broadening of the ATM-cancer susceptibility syndrome phenotype to improve the recognition of affected patients and provide more efficacious, germline-directed therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicholas A. Borja
- Dr. John T. Macdonald Foundation Department of Human Genetics, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FL, United States
| | - Rachel Silva-Smith
- Dr. John T. Macdonald Foundation Department of Human Genetics, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FL, United States
| | - Marilyn Huang
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami, Miami, FL, United States
| | - Dipen J. Parekh
- Desai Sethi Urology Institute, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FL, United States
| | - Daniel Sussman
- Division of Digestive Health and Liver Diseases, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, United States
| | - Mustafa Tekin
- Dr. John T. Macdonald Foundation Department of Human Genetics, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FL, United States,John P. Hussmann Institute for Human Genomics, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FL, United States,*Correspondence: Mustafa Tekin,
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Fang X, Zhang T, Chen Z. Solute Carrier Family 7 Member 11 (SLC7A11) is a Potential Prognostic Biomarker in Uterine Corpus Endometrial Carcinoma. Int J Gen Med 2023; 16:481-497. [PMID: 36777097 PMCID: PMC9910205 DOI: 10.2147/ijgm.s398351] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2022] [Accepted: 01/18/2023] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Uterine corpus endometrial carcinoma (UCEC) is a common type of gynecological cancers, second only to cervical cancer in incidence. Thus, it is necessary to develop effective therapies and identify biomarkers for its prognosis. Solute carrier family 7 member 11 (SLC7A11) is well known for its role in maintaining the intracellular glutathione level and preventing oxidative-stress-induced cell death. However, the association between SLC7A11 expression and prognosis as well as the correlation between tumor-infiltrating immune cells (TIICs) and immunotherapy of UCEC has rarely been reported. This study aims to evaluate the prognostic significance and immune cell infiltration level of SLC7A11 in UCEC. Methods Bioinformatics analysis tools and databases, including R software, National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI), The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), GEPIA2, Sangerbox, Kaplan-Meier (K-M) Plotter, TISIDB, and TIMER2, were utilized to measure the expression level and clarify the clinical significance of SLC7A11 in UCEC. Results SLC7A11 expression was dramatically up-regulated in UCEC patients and associated with prognosis. DNA methylation levels in the SLC7A11-promoter region were significantly higher in normal participants than in patients with UCEC. We also showed that SLC7A11 overexpression was associated with TIICs, immune checkpoint blockers (ICBs), and immunotherapy response in UCEC. The half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) results obtained with the cohort from TCGA showed that Z-VAD-FMK (Caspase inhibitor), S-Triphenylmethyl-L-cysteine (S-Trityl-L-cysteine), and TAE684 (ALK inhibitor) had higher IC50 values in low-expression patient (p < 0.05). Conclusion SLC7A11 overexpression is associated with favorable prognosis of patients with UCEC and is associated with TIICs and the responses to immunotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiangming Fang
- Shulan (Hangzhou) Hospital Affiliated to Zhejiang Shuren University Shulan International Medical College, Hangzhou, People’s Republic of China,Correspondence: Xiangming Fang, Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Shulan (Hangzhou) Hospital Affiliated to Zhejiang Shuren University Shulan International Medical College, 848# Dongxin Road, Hangzhou City, Zhejiang Province, 310000, People’s Republic of China, Tel +86-0571-87236570, Email
| | - Ting Zhang
- Department of Pathology, Hangzhou Tongchuang Medical Laboratory, Hangzhou, People’s Republic of China
| | - Zhitao Chen
- Shulan (Hangzhou) Hospital Affiliated to Zhejiang Shuren University Shulan International Medical College, Hangzhou, People’s Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Heald B, Mokhtary S, Nielsen SM, Rojahn S, Yang S, Michalski ST, Esplin ED. Unexpected actionable genetic variants revealed by multigene panel testing of patients with uterine cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2022; 166:344-350. [PMID: 35691755 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2022.05.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2022] [Revised: 05/09/2022] [Accepted: 05/28/2022] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Hereditary uterine cancer (UC) is traditionally associated with pathogenic/likely pathogenic germline variants (PGVs) in Lynch syndrome genes or PTEN; however, growing evidence supports a role for other genes that may reveal new clinical management options. In this study we assessed the prevalence and potential clinical impact of PGVs identified in UC patients referred for comprehensive germline genetic testing that combined testing for Lynch syndrome, PTEN, and other cancer predisposition genes. METHODS Prevalence of PGVs in patients referred to a single clinical lab for germline genetic testing with an indication of uterine or endometrial cancer were retrospectively assessed and compared by syndrome type, patient age at testing, and self-reported ancestry. Potential clinical actionability of PGVs was based on established guidelines for clinical management, targeted therapies, and clinical trial eligibility. RESULTS PGVs were detected in 13.6% of the cohort (880/6490). PGVs were most frequently observed in Lynch syndrome genes (60.4%) and PTEN (1.5%), with 38.1% in another cancer predisposition gene (i.e., CHEK2, BRCA1/BRCA2). PGV prevalence was similar for patients <50 years and those ≥50 years (15.1% vs 13.2%). Nearly all PGVs (97.2%) were associated with guideline-recommended management, including cascade testing; 60.5% were associated with FDA-approved therapies; and 35.2% were associated with clinical trials. CONCLUSIONS Focusing germline testing on Lynch syndrome genes and PTEN and limiting testing to patients <50 years of age at diagnosis may overlook a substantial proportion of UC patients who harbor actionable PGVs. Universal comprehensive genetic testing of UC patients could benefit many patients and at-risk family members.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brandie Heald
- Invitae, 1400 16th Street, San Francisco, CA 94103, USA
| | - Sara Mokhtary
- Invitae, 1400 16th Street, San Francisco, CA 94103, USA
| | | | - Susan Rojahn
- Invitae, 1400 16th Street, San Francisco, CA 94103, USA
| | - Shan Yang
- Invitae, 1400 16th Street, San Francisco, CA 94103, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Kim YN, Kim MK, Lee YJ, Lee Y, Sohn JY, Lee JY, Choi MC, Kim M, Jung SG, Joo WD, Lee C. Identification of Lynch Syndrome in Patients with Endometrial Cancer Based on a Germline Next Generation Sequencing Multigene Panel Test. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14143406. [PMID: 35884469 PMCID: PMC9316192 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14143406] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2022] [Revised: 07/11/2022] [Accepted: 07/12/2022] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
We aimed to investigate the prevalence and relative contributions of LS and non-LS mutations in patients with endometrial cancer in Korea. We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 204 patients diagnosed with endometrial cancer who underwent a germline next generation sequencing multigene panel test covering MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, PMS2, and EPCAM at three tertiary centers. Thirty patients (14.7%) with pathogenic mutations (12 MLH1; 6 MSH2; 10 MSH6; 2 PMS2) and 20 patients (9.8%) with 22 unclassified variants (8 MLH1; 8 MSH2; 2 MSH6; 3 PMS2; 1 EPCAM) were identified. After excluding four close relatives of a proband, the prevalence of LS was 13.0% (26/200). Patients with LS were more likely than those with sporadic cancer to be younger at diagnosis (48 vs. 53 years, p = 0.045) and meet the Amsterdam II criteria (66.7 vs. 3.5%, p < 0.001). Non-endometrioid histology was more prevalent in patients with MSH6 or PMS2 mutations (41.7%) than those with MLH1 or MSH2 mutations (5.6%, p = 0.026). In this pre-selected cohort of endometrial cancer patients who underwent next generation sequencing, the prevalence of LS was 13%, thus supporting the use of gene panel testing for endometrial cancer patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yoo-Na Kim
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Institute of Women’s Life Medical Science, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul 03722, Korea; (Y.-N.K.); (Y.J.L.)
| | - Min Kyu Kim
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Samsung Changwon Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University of Medicine, Changwon 51353, Korea; (M.K.K.); (Y.L.)
| | - Young Joo Lee
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Institute of Women’s Life Medical Science, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul 03722, Korea; (Y.-N.K.); (Y.J.L.)
| | - Youngeun Lee
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Samsung Changwon Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University of Medicine, Changwon 51353, Korea; (M.K.K.); (Y.L.)
| | - Ji Yeon Sohn
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Eone Laboratories, Incheon 22014, Korea;
| | - Jung-Yun Lee
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Institute of Women’s Life Medical Science, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul 03722, Korea; (Y.-N.K.); (Y.J.L.)
- Correspondence: (J.-Y.L.); (M.C.C.); Tel.: +82-2-2228-2237 (J.-Y.L.); +82-31-780-6191 (M.C.C.)
| | - Min Chul Choi
- Comprehensive Gynecologic Cancer Center, CHA Bundang Medical Center, CHA University, Seongnam 13496, Korea; (M.K.); (S.G.J.); (W.D.J.); (C.L.)
- Correspondence: (J.-Y.L.); (M.C.C.); Tel.: +82-2-2228-2237 (J.-Y.L.); +82-31-780-6191 (M.C.C.)
| | - Migang Kim
- Comprehensive Gynecologic Cancer Center, CHA Bundang Medical Center, CHA University, Seongnam 13496, Korea; (M.K.); (S.G.J.); (W.D.J.); (C.L.)
| | - Sang Geun Jung
- Comprehensive Gynecologic Cancer Center, CHA Bundang Medical Center, CHA University, Seongnam 13496, Korea; (M.K.); (S.G.J.); (W.D.J.); (C.L.)
| | - Won Duk Joo
- Comprehensive Gynecologic Cancer Center, CHA Bundang Medical Center, CHA University, Seongnam 13496, Korea; (M.K.); (S.G.J.); (W.D.J.); (C.L.)
| | - Chan Lee
- Comprehensive Gynecologic Cancer Center, CHA Bundang Medical Center, CHA University, Seongnam 13496, Korea; (M.K.); (S.G.J.); (W.D.J.); (C.L.)
| |
Collapse
|