Risk stratification of HPV-positive results using extended genotyping and cytology: Data from the baseline phase of the Onclarity trial

Evaluating PAX1 methylation for cervical cancer screening triage in non-16/18 hrHPV-positive women

BACKGROUND

In China, the national cervical cancer screening protocol involves initial testing for high-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV), followed by cytology for hrHPV-positive cases. This study evaluates the effectiveness of PAX1 methylation (PAX1m) analysis in identifying precancerous or cancerous lesions in cervical samples from Chinese women positive for non-16/18 hrHPV strains.

METHODS

Between February 2022 and March 2023, 281 cervical samples from non-16/18 hrHPV-positive women underwent cytological examination and PAX1m analysis. The study assessed the statistical relationship between PAX1m levels and the presence of cervical lesions, comparing the diagnostic performance of PAX1m to conventional cytology.

RESULTS

A significant association was found between PAX1 methylation levels and the risk of CIN2 + and CIN3 + lesions, with 47 instances of CIN2 + detected. Odds ratios (ORs) for moderate and high PAX1m levels were 8.86 (95% CI: 2.24-42.17) and 166.32 (95% CI: 47.09-784.97), respectively. The area under the ROC curve for PAX1m in identifying CIN2 + lesions was 0.948 (95% CI: 0.895-0.99). PAX1m demonstrated similar sensitivity and negative predictive value (NPV) to cytology but reduced the colposcopy referral rate from 47.7% with cytology alone to 25.6% with PAX1m, showing superior specificity and positive predictive value across age groups.

CONCLUSIONS

PAX1 methylation is a strong indicator of CIN2 + and CIN3 + risk, offering diagnostic performance comparable to cytology with the added benefit of reduced unnecessary colposcopy referrals. These findings support the use of PAX1m analysis as a reliable tool for triaging non-16/18 hrHPV-positive women in outpatient settings.

Performance of urine samples compared to cervical samples for detection of precancer lesions among HPV-positive women attending colposcopy clinic in Mexico City

BACKGROUND

High-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) detection in self-collected urine samples (SeCUS) may be a promising alternative for cervical cancer screening because of its greater acceptability, as long as it can offer comparable sensitivity to clinician-collected cervical samples (CCoS) for detecting precancer lesions.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the performance of the SeCUS compared to that of the CCoS for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 (CIN3) detection among hrHPV-positive women receiving colposcopy in Mexico City using different specific extended HPV typing procedures: HPV16/18, HPV16/18/35/39/68 or HPV16/18/35/39/68/31.

METHODS

From March 2017 to August 2018, 4,158 female users of the cervical cancer screening program at Tlalpan Sanitary Jurisdiction in Mexico City were invited to participate in the FRIDA-Tlalpan study. All participants provided ≥ 30 mL of SeCUS, and then a CCoS was obtained with Cervex-Brush®, which was used for hrHPV typing. Participants who tested positive for hrHPV in CCoS were referred for colposcopy for diagnostic confirmation, and all SeCUS of these women were also tested for hrHPV typing.

RESULTS

In total, 561 hrHPV-positive women were identified by CCoS via colposcopy, and 82.2% of the SeCUS of these women were also hrHPV positive. From both CCoS and SeCUS, 7 cases of CIN3 were detected. Considering HPV16/18 typing, CCoS and SeCUS detected 4 cases of CIN3, but after HPV16/18/35/39/68/31 extension typing, both CCoS and SeCUS detected all 7 of the CIN3 cases among the hrHPV-positive women.

CONCLUSIONS

Using extended hrHPV typing based on HPV16/18/35/39/68/31, our results suggest that the performance of SeCUS may be equivalent to that of CCoS for detecting CIN3 lesions. Although our results are inconclusive, they support the hypothesis that SeCUS may be an attractive alternative worthy of further research.

Immediate histologic correlation in patients with different HPV genotypes and ages: a single center analysis in China

BACKGROUND

Human papillomavirus (HPV) has been confirmed as a major causative factor for malignant transformation of cervical epithelial cells and for the development of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) and invasive cervical cancer. We carried out this study to investigate the association of different HPV genotypes and ages with immediate histological cervical lesions in opportunistic screening patients in a single center.

METHODS

A total of 1,661 samples with biopsy-confirmed histologic findings were collected from the gynecological clinic of our hospital between October 2017 and May 2020 for analysis. The distribution of single-type HPV genotypes in CIN of different severities and the age-dependent prevalence for single-type HPV infection were analyzed.

RESULTS

In both CIN2 and CIN3 group, HPV16, 58, 52, 33 and 31/18 were detected as top 5 high-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) types, which accounts for 89.25% and 88.54% of single HPV infection incidence respectively. Besides, not a single case of HPV45 was found in CIN2 and CIN3. HPV16 was the dominant genotype in both CIN2 and CIN3, accounted for 46.24% and 55.21%, respectively. The prevalence of HPV16 was the most frequent in all the age groups, except ≥ 65 years group in CIN3, and almost one in three HPV16-positive patients were diagnosed with high grade CIN. The peak of the incidence of CIN3 was observed at 25 ~ 34 years (33.68%), followed by 35 ~ 44 years (31.58%).

CONCLUSION

High grade CIN peak at 25 ~ 44 years, women of this age are recommended for normative screening if conditions permit. HPV16-positive patients should be given high priority in opportunistic screening, while the single-center data suggesting a low risk of CIN2/3 in HPV45-positive patients. For women ≥ 65 years old, patients infected with other HPV types should be also taken seriously. In general, HPV16, 58, 52, 33, 31 and 18 were the most common genotypes in CIN2/3, and a vaccine including these predominant genotypes might be of great significance for cervical cancer prevention in China.

Clinical Performance of hrHPV Primary Screening Using Vaginal versus Cervical Samples to Detect High-grade Intraepithelial Lesions

High-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) testing is now the most recommended primary method for cervical cancer screening worldwide. Clinician-collected cervical sampling continues to be the main sampling method, but hrHPV vaginal self-sampling is an appealing alternative because of its greater acceptability and potentially higher cost-effectiveness. This study aimed to determine whether hrHPV vaginal self-sampling is comparable with clinician-collected cervical sampling for detecting histologically confirmed high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN2/3) as part of a cervical cancer screening program in Mexico. We analyzed data from 5,856 women screened during a hrHPV-based screening study. Clinical performance and diagnostic efficiency metrics were estimated for the two sampling methods for the CIN3 and CIN2+ endpoints, using three triage strategies: HPV16/18 genotyping, HPV16/18/33/58 extended genotyping, and HPV16/18/31/33/58 extended genotyping. hrHPV-positivity was found in 801 (13.7%) cervical and 897 (15.3%) vaginal samples. All women with hrHPV-positive samples were referred to colposcopy, which detected 17 total CIN3 cases before considering retrospective triage strategies. Using the HPV16/18/31/33/58 extended genotyping strategy, 245 women had hrHPV-positive cervical samples and 269 had hrHPV-positive vaginal samples. Ten CIN3 cases were detected each among women with hrHPV-positive cervical samples and among those with hrHPV-positive vaginal samples when using this strategy, with no significant differences in sensitivity and specificity observed. We observe that self- and clinician-collected sampling methods are comparable for detecting CIN3 and CIN2+ regardless of the triage strategy used. These findings can help public health officials to develop more cost-effective cervical cancer screening programs that maximize participation.

PREVENTION RELEVANCE

We found that hrHPV vaginal self-sampling is comparable with hrHPV clinician cervical sampling when using any triage strategy to refer women to colposcopy, so self-sampling is a viable cervical screening method. Therefore, policymakers should consider incorporating self-sampling into cervical screening programs to increase screening coverage and reduce cervical cancer burden. See related Spotlight, p. 649.