Incidence of venous thromboembolism in patients with advanced stage ovarian cancer undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy: Is it time for thromboprophylaxis?

Risk factors for venous thromboembolism in patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy as treatment for ovarian cancer

OBJECTIVE

During the treatment of ovarian cancer, the risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) post operatively is well established, however, patients may be at even greater risk during neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT). This study aimed to determine the incidence and timing of VTE amongst patients undergoing NACT, whether there was an association with survival, and examine risk factors associated with the development of VTE.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a retrospective cohort study of patients diagnosed with ovarian, fallopian tube and primary peritoneal cancer receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy betweenApril 2011 and April 2022 at a gynaecological cancer centre in England. Clinical factors examined included: age at diagnosis, Body Mass Index (BMI), presence of inflammatory co-morbidity, tumour morphology, stage of disease, pelvic mass,ascites,retroperitoneal lymphadenopathy, Khorana score, serum albumin levels, chemotherapy regime, bevacizumab administration and Ca 125 levels.

RESULTS

Of 304 patients analysed, 73 (24%) patients developed venous thromboembolism. Of the patients who developed VTE, fifty-five patients developed pulmonary embolism (75%) and the stage of treatment at which most VTEs were diagnosed was neoadjuvant chemotherapy (32%). There was no correlation observed, between the incidence of VTE and any risk factors, including Khorana score, with the exception of low albumin (<35 g/L)(odds ratio (OR):2.1(95%CI 1.1-3.9; p = 0.06) and patients who did not receive paclitaxel chemotherapy (OR:2.04(95%CI 1.02-4.05; p = 0.08). There was no difference in survival rates between the VTE group and the non-VTE group.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates high rates of VTE, especially pulmonary embolism, in ovarian cancer patients undergoing NACT. The present study, amongst others in the literature also suggest that the risk of VTE in ovarian cancer patients undergoing NACT is underestimated by current risk stratification models. Therefore, prospective trials dedicated to ovarian cancer patients specifically, and a development of a risk model that takes into account factors established by higher levels of evidence, are strongly recommended.

Endothelial Dysfunction Markers in Ovarian Cancer: VTE Risk and Tumour Prognostic Outcomes

Ovarian cancer (OC) presents daunting lethality rates worldwide, with frequent late-stage diagnosis and chemoresistance, highlighting the need for improved prognostic approaches. Venous thromboembolism (VTE), a major cancer mortality factor, is partially driven by endothelial dysfunction (ED). ED's pro-inflammatory state fosters tumour progression, suggesting a VTE-independent link between ED and cancer. Given this triad's interplay, ED markers may influence OC behaviour and patients' prognosis. Thus, the impact of ED-related genes and single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) on OC-related VTE and patient thrombogenesis-independent prognosis was investigated. NOS3 upregulation was linked to lower VTE incidence (χ2, p = 0.013), while SELP upregulation was associated with shorter overall survival (log-rank test, p = 0.048). Dismissing patients with VTE before OC diagnosis, SELP rs6136 T allele carriers presented lower progression-free survival (log-rank test, p = 0.038). Nevertheless, due to the SNP minor allele underrepresentation, further investigation is required. Taken together, ED markers seem to exhibit roles that depend on the clinical context, such as tumour-related thrombogenesis or cancer prognosis. Validation with larger cohorts and more in-depth functional studies are needed for data clarification and potential therapeutic strategies exploitation to tackle cancer progression and thrombosis in OC patients.

Incidence and risk factors of silent deep venous thromboembolism before interval debulking surgery in ovarian cancer patients, a tertiary centre experience

Objective

To determine the prevalence and risk factors for the development of asymptomatic venous thromboembolism (VTE) in ovarian cancer patients who underwent interval cytoreductive surgery after finishing neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Methods

This is a prospective observational trial. Female patients with pathologically proven ovarian cancer who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy without clinical evidence of VTE were included.

Results

A total of 107 patients were enrolled in this study. The mean age was 53.37 years, and the mean body mass index (BMI) was 34.11 kg/m2. Seven (6.5 %) patients suffered from silent VTE, as documented by bilateral Doppler ultrasound in the pre- and postoperative settings. The mean age of the patients in the VTE group was 56.17 years, and their mean body mass index was 31.71 Kg/m2. Their median serum CA125 concentration was elevated (325.6 units/ml). On the other hand, the median D-dimer level was elevated by 678 ng/ml fibrinogen equivalent units (FEUs) in the same group of patients. In the present study, comorbidities did not influence the incidence of VTE, as the 7 patients who were diagnosed with VTE did not have any comorbidities. Most of the patients who were diagnosed with serous adenocarcinoma (71.4 %) or stage IIIc disease (57.1 %) were most likely to develop VTE.

Conclusion

Silent VTE is more prevalent in patients with advanced-stage ovarian cancer and serous carcinomas.

Higher incidence of venous thromboembolism associated with increasing lines of treatment in heavily treated ovarian cancer patients

OBJECTIVE

Ovarian cancer is associated with a high rate of venous thromboembolism. Our objective is to report the incidence of venous thromboembolism in recurrent ovarian cancer, assess the impact on morbidity and mortality, and evaluate predictors of venous thromboembolism.

METHODS

A retrospective single institution cohort study was performed. Patients with a diagnosis of recurrent ovarian cancer between 2007 and 2020 and no previous history of venous thromboembolism were identified. Demographic and clinical variables were collected. Univariate and multivariable analyses were performed to identify predictors of venous thromboembolism.

RESULTS

Of the 345 patients included in this study, 77 (22.3%) developed a venous thromboembolism. Most (n=56, 72.7%) were actively receiving treatment at the time of diagnosis of venous thromboembolism, of whom 44 (78.6%) had received three or more lines of treatment. In total, 42 (54.5%) were admitted to hospital on diagnosis and one mortality (1.3%) occurred secondary to venous thromboembolism. An intermediate/high risk Khorana score was not predictive of venous thromboembolism (p=0.24). The risk of venous thromboembolism was significantly higher with increasing lines of chemotherapy (odds ratio 1.14, 95% confidence interval 1.02 to 1.28 per line, p=0.026). There was no significant difference in overall survival (62.9 vs 49.1 median months, p=0.29) between patients with and without venous thromboembolism.

CONCLUSIONS

More than 20% of patients with recurrent ovarian cancer developed a venous thromboembolism, and most occurred after three or more lines of treatment. The risk of venous thromboembolism was higher with increasing lines of chemotherapy. While venous thromboembolism did not appear to impact survival in this population, nearly half required hospitalization, emphasizing the morbidity of venous thromboembolism and potential impact on healthcare costs. Further studies are needed to improve risk stratification for venous thromboembolism in this high risk population.

Incidence of venous thromboembolism in patients with ovarian cancer receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy: systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Venous thromboembolism is associated with significant patient morbidity, mortality, and can lead to delays in treatment for patients with cancer. The objectives of this study were to identify the incidence of venous thromboembolism in patients with advanced ovarian cancer receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and identify risk factors for venous thromboembolism.

METHODS

A systematic literature search of biomedical databases, including Ovid Medline, Web of Science, Scopus, CINAHL, and Embase was performed on December 6, 2022 and updated on December 21, 2023 for peer reviewed articles. Studies were included if they were cohort studies or randomized controlled trials that evaluated the incidence of venous thromboembolism for patients with ovarian cancer receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Risk of bias assessment was performed using the Newcastle Ottawa Scale for cohort studies and the Cochrane risk of bias tool for randomized controlled trials. Random effects meta-analysis was used to pool results across studies.

RESULTS

A total of 2636 studies were screened, and 11 were included in the review. Ten were retrospective cohort studies, and one was a randomized controlled trial. The incidence of venous thromboembolism in the included studies ranged from 0% to 18.9%. The pooled incidence rate of venous thromboembolism was 10% (95% confidence interval (CI) 7% to 13%). This remained significant when restricted to only studies with a low risk of bias (pooled incidence of 11%, 95% CI 9% to 14%). Body mass index of ≥30 kg/m2 was a significant risk factor for venous thromboembolism with a pooled odds ratio of 1.76 (95% CI 1.13 to 2.76) CONCLUSIONS: The results from this study demonstrated a 10% incidence of venous thromboembolism for patients with advanced ovarian cancer receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy. This suggests that there may be a role for universal thromboprophylaxis in this population.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

PROSPERO CRD42022339602.

Incidence and risk factors of venous and arterial thromboembolic events among patients with ovarian cancer- data from a large Canadian database

OBJECTIVES

To determine the incidence of thromboembolic events (TEEs) in ovarian cancer patients and to identify risk factors that are significantly associated with the development of venous thromboembolism (VTE), arterial thromboembolism (ATE), or overall TEEs in this population.

METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort study of 4491 patients with epithelial ovarian cancer identified in the British Columbia cancer registry between 1996 and 2017. The presence of TEEs and risk factors were identified in administrative health records from fee-for-service provider visits and hospital data using ICD-9-CM and ICD-10-CM billing codes. Statistical analysis was performed using Chi-squared test and Fischer's exact test.

RESULTS

Of 4491 patients with epithelial ovarian cancer included in this study, 1.74% experienced ATE and (9.44%) experienced VTE. There was a significant association found between the occurrence of TEEs and all-cause mortality. Sepsis was significantly associated with both venous and arterial thromboembolism. The top three risk factors for arterial thromboembolism included peripheral vascular disease (PVD), open wound, and aneurysm.

CONCLUSIONS

Risk factors predictive of thrombosis in ovarian cancer patients are not consistent between ATE and VTE, thus thrombotic events should not be combined for analysis. Differential thrombosis risk assessment is needed to improve prevention strategies and guide thromboprophylaxis for these patients.

Implementation of routine venous thromboembolism prophylaxis during neoadjuvant chemotherapy for patients with ovarian cancer

OBJECTIVE

To compare the venous thromboembolism (VTE) rate in patients with ovarian cancer undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy before and after implementing routine thromboprophylaxis.

METHODS

This is a quasi-experimental pre-post study evaluating the VTE rate in patients with ovarian cancer who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy following a quality improvement initiative of routine thromboprophylaxis within a single healthcare system that started in January 2017. Patients were excluded if VTE was diagnosed before initiating chemotherapy. Patient factors and perioperative variables of interest were investigated for their association with VTE through univariate and multivariate models.

RESULTS

Of the 136 patients in the pre-implementation group, 3.7% (n = 5) received thromboprophylaxis. Of the 154 patients in the post-implementation group, 65.6% (n = 101) received thromboprophylaxis. Provider compliance varied from 51% in 2019 to 79.3% in 2021. The overall rate of VTE, from the start of chemotherapy to the end of treatment, was 21.3% (n = 29) pre- and 8.4% (n = 13) in the post-implementation group (p < 0.01). There was no difference in major bleeding events between groups (0% vs. 0.68%, p = 0.63). On univariate analysis, thromboprophylaxis (OR 0.19; 95% CI 0.07-0.52) and post-implementation period (OR 0.34; 95% CI 0.17-0.69) were associated with a decreased risk of any VTE during primary treatment. On multivariate analysis, only thromboprophylaxis remained significantly associated with reduced VTE rates (aOR 0.19; 95% CI 0.07-0.53).

CONCLUSION

Routine thromboprophylaxis during neoadjuvant chemotherapy is associated with reduced risk of VTE throughout primary treatment and is not associated with increased bleeding events.

Systematic Review of the Survival Outcomes of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Women with Malignant Ovarian Germ Cell Tumors

Randomized clinical trials assessing the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer have predominantly included women with high-grade serous carcinomas. The response rate and oncological outcomes of NACT for malignant ovarian germ cell tumors (MOGCT) are poorly understood. This study aimed to examine the effects of NACT on women with MOGCT by conducting a systematic review of four public search engines. Fifteen studies were identified, and a further descriptive analysis was performed for 10 original articles. In those studies, most women were treated with a bleomycin, etoposide, and cisplatin regimen, and one to three cycles were used in most studies. Four studies comparing NACT and primary debulking surgery showed similar complete response rates (n = 2; pooled odds ratio [OR] 0.90, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.15-5.27), comparable overall survival (n = 3; 87.0-100% versus 70.0-100%), disease-free survival (n = 3; 87.0-100% versus 70.0-100%), recurrence rate (n = 1; OR 3.50, 95%CI 0.38-32.50), and adverse events rate from chemotherapy between the groups. In conclusion, NACT may be considered for the management of MOGCT; however, possible candidates for NACT use and an ideal number of NACT cycles remain unknown. Further studies are warranted to validate the efficacy of NACT in advanced MOGCT patients.