Utility of the revised FIGO2023 staging with molecular classification in endometrial cancer

Prognostic performance of the 2023 FIGO staging schema for endometrial cancer

OBJECTIVE

To assess the prognostic performance of the 2023 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) endometrial cancer staging schema.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study queried the Commission-on-Cancer's National Cancer Database. Study population was 129,146 patients with stage I-IV endometrial cancer per the 2009 FIGO staging schema. Stage-shifting and overall survival (OS) were assessed according to the 2023 FIGO staging schema.

RESULTS

Upstage (IA → II, 21.4 %; IB → II, 53.0 %) and downstage (IIIA→IA3, 22.2 %) occurred in both early and advanced diseases. Inter-stage prognostic performance improved in the 2023 schema with widened 5-year OS rate difference between the earliest and highest stages (68.2 % to 76.9 %). Stage IA1-IIB and IIC had distinct 5-year OS rate differences (85.8-96.1 % vs 75.4 %). The 5-year OS rate of the 2009 stage IIIA disease was 63.9 %; this was greater segregated in the 2023 schema: 88.0 %, 62.4 %, and 55.7 % for IIIA→IA3, IIIA1, and IIIA2, respectively (inter-substage rate-difference, 32.3 %). This 5-year OS rate of stage IA3 disease was comparable to the 2023 stage IB-IIB diseases (88.0 % vs 85.8-89.5 %). In the 2023 stage IIIC schema (micrometastasis rates: 29.6 % in IIIC1 and 15.6 % in IIIC2), micrometastasis and macrometastasis had the distinct 3-year OS rates in both pelvic (IIIC1-i vs IIIC1-ii, 84.9 % vs 71.1 %; rate-difference 13.8 %) and para-aortic (IIIC2-i vs IIIC2-ii, 82.9 % vs 65.2 %; rate-difference 17.7 %) nodal metastasis cases. The 5-year OS rate of the 2009 stage IVB disease was 23.4 %; this was segregated to 25.4 % for stage IVB and 19.2 % for stage IVC in the 2023 staging schema (rate-difference, 6.2 %).

CONCLUSION

The 2023 FIGO endometrial cancer staging schema is a major revision from the 2009 FIGO schema. Almost doubled enriched sub-stages based on detailed anatomical metastatic site and incorporation of histological information enable more robust prognostication.

Impact of molecular and histopathological findings on FIGO 2009 stage I endometrial cancer: Transition to FIGO 2023 staging system

AIM

This study aims to investigate the impact of integrating molecular and histopathological findings into the revised International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) 2023 staging system on patients initially diagnosed with stage I endometrial cancer (EC) according to the FIGO 2009 criteria.

METHODS

A cohort of 197 EC patients, initially classified as stage I under FIGO 2009, underwent restaging based on the updated FIGO 2023 criteria. The patients' molecular and histopathological characteristics were documented, and their impact on upstaging was analyzed.

RESULTS

Molecular profiling was conducted for 81.2% (160/197) of the patients, revealing that 55.3% (109/197) were classified as non-specific molecular profile, 14.7% (29/197) as mismatch repair deficiency, 11.2% (22/197) as p53 abnormality (p53abn), and 18.8% (37/197) as unknown. Upstaging was identified in 26.9% (43/160) of the 160 patients with known molecular profiles. Among the upstaged patients, 51.2% experienced upstaging due to p53 abnormality, 20.9% due to substantial lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI), 20.9% due to aggressive histological types, and 6.9% due to high grade.

CONCLUSIONS

The introduction of the molecular profile into the revised FIGO 2023 staging system for stage I EC has led to notable changes in the staging of approximately one-fifth of patients. While p53 abnormalities have emerged as the most influential factor contributing to the upstaging, LVSI and aggressive histological types also represent significant contributing factors.

International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics Endometrial 2023 Is Better For Radiation Oncology Patients

The International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) 2023 staging system for endometrial cancer has marked changes from the previous staging system instituted 14 years prior in 2009. The new staging system includes nonanatomic factors for the first time (lymphovascular space invasion and histology) and molecular classification, which impacts the stage in early-stage disease (IAmPOLEmut and IICmp53abn). The purpose of these changes was to provide (1) high accuracy in the predictive prognosis for patients and (2) identification of distinct treatment-relevant subgroups. Our understanding of the biology and natural history of endometrial cancer has undergone a radical transformation since the Cancer Genome Atlas results in 2013. The 2023 FIGO staging system harmonizes and integrates old and new knowledge on anatomic, histopathologic, and molecular features. Moreover, FIGO 2023 has distinct substages that improve adjuvant treatment decision making. Although the practicality of the new staging system has been debated, we postulate that FIGO 2023 is more useful for radiation oncologists aiming to provide personalized care recommendations. FIGO 2023 requires a change in our perception of a staging system, from a traditional anatomic borders-based system to a staging system integrating anatomy and tumor biology as pivotal prognostic factors for patients while providing important information for treatment decision making.

Validation of the FIGO2023 staging system for early-stage endometrial cancer

BACKGROUND

In 2023, the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) updated the endometrial cancer staging system (FIGO2023). Our study aimed to validate the prognostic value of FIGO2023 in patients with early-stage EC (Stage I and Stage II).

METHODS

After screening eligible EC patients from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database, Kaplan-Meier cancer-specific survival (CSS) curves were used to evaluate the prognosis of patients with different stages. In addition, AUC, C-index, Akaike Information Criterion (AIC), Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC), and Decision curve analysis (DCA) were used to comprehensively compare the efficacy of the new and the old staging system in predicting prognosis.

RESULTS

A total of 33,156 patients were enrolled. The introduction of FIGO2023 significantly increased the proportion of stage II patients from 5.53 % to 24.76 %. The FIGO2023 defines different substages for patients, which show significant differences in CSS. Compared with FIGO2009, FIGO2023 performed better in discrimination, goodness of fit and clinical decision making.

CONCLUSION

Compared with FIGO2009, FIGO2023 had a higher accuracy in predicting CSS in patients with early-stage EC in the SEER database.

FIGO 2023 endometrial staging: a leap of faith into the new "prognostic based' rather than "anatomical based" staging-too fast too furious??

BACKGROUND

In 2023 FIGO revised the endometrial cancer staging system after 13 years. There is a lacuna of data regarding the performance and practicality of the revised 2023 FIGO staging schema for endometrial cancer from Low Middle-Income Countries (LMIC).

OBJECTIVE

To estimate the shift of stage and adjuvant management of endometrial cancer based on the FIGO 2023 system compared to the FIGO 2009 system and assess the predictive potential of the FIGO 2023 system.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted from 1st January 2017 to 31st December 2022. All patients with endometrial cancer were staged according to the FIGO 2023 and FIGO 2009 staging system. Follow-up of patients was done to determine recurrence.

RESULTS

A total of 152 patients were included. Aggressive histology was seen in 66 (45%) patients. Eighteen (11%) had subserosal involvement. Substantial LVSI was noted in 23 (15%) of patients. Twenty-four (47%) patients of FIGO 2009 Stage IA and 26 patients (63%) of FIGO 2009 Stage IB were upstaged. Eleven (50%) patients of FIGO 2009 Stage IIIA were down staged to IA3. Overall 23 patients (15%) had a shift of stage. Fifteen out of 152 patients (15%) would have had a possible risk stratification change which would imply 23 patients (15%) would have needed a more radical treatment. Molecular classification was done in 32 patients; however, only 2 patients could afford POLE testing. Kaplan-Meier curves showed significant PFS differences in FIGO 2009 Stage IB and Stage IIIA when restaged according to the FIGO 2023 system.

CONCLUSION

The FIGO 2023 endometrial staging is a more robust prognosticator; however, the practicality of molecular classification in LMICs is still a distant dream.

2023 FIGO staging system for endometrial cancer: The evolution of the revolution

INTRODUCTION

Embracing the complex and diverse nature of the heterogenous group of malignancies that are included under the umbrella of "endometrial cancer" (EC) to better align prognosis with treatment recommendations, requires a more comprehensive staging system. Our goal at the development of the new FIGO staging was to provide 1) high accuracy in the predictive prognosis for a patient with EC, which is the genuine purpose of a staging system, and 2) identification of distinct treatment relevant subgroups. Since the publication of the 2009 staging system by the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) 14  years ago (1, 2), our understanding of the biology and natural history of EC has undergone a radical transformation. The TGCA results in 2013 (3), and the many validation reports published since then (4-9), have taught us that "EC" is composed of at least four distinct molecularly defined diseases. Strong histopathologic markers reflecting tumor biology such as lymph vascular space invasion (LVSI) were identified. Importantly, anatomical borders were shown to lose their prognostic relevance for EC patients in the presence of dominant tumor biology-markers such as molecular subtypes/LVSI (10, 11). This emphasizes the integration of these novel markers into a prognostic staging system that aims to be relevant to patients. The 2023 FIGO staging system for EC harmonizes and integrates old and new knowledge on anatomic, histopathologic, and molecular features (12). It requires a change in our perception of a staging system, from a traditional purely anatomical borders-based system to an integrated staging system integrating anatomical borders and tumor biology as pivotal prognostic factors for EC patients while providing important information for treatment decision making. Therefore, the 2023 FIGO staging system demonstrates the logical next step in the evolution of the revolution in a patient-centric staging approach. Below, we elucidate the rationale for the FIGO 2023 endometrial cancer staging system.

Differentiation of survival outcomes by anatomic involvement and histology with the revised 2023 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics staging system for endometrial cancer

OBJECTIVES

The International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) staging system for endometrial cancer underwent revision in 2023, incorporating histology, lymphovascular space invasion, and molecular classification. Herein, we compare overall survival (OS) outcomes by anatomic and histologic involvement for patients staged by the 2009 system versus 2023 system.

METHODS

The National Cancer Database (NCDB) was queried for patients with newly-diagnosed uterine adenocarcinoma from 2004 to 2015, with follow-up data extending through 2020. Stage was determined by both the 2009 and 2023 FIGO staging systems. Kaplan-Meier estimators and Cox proportional hazards models were used for survival analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 134,677 patients were analyzed. Per 2023 classification, patients with stage I disease decreased from 96,161 to 70,101 (-27.1%, p < 0.01), while stage II disease increased from 9295 to 36,294 (+390.5%, p < 0.01). Greatest OS change was observed for 2023 stage IA3 patients (low-risk, synchronous endometrial and ovarian tumors with a clonal relationship), whose 10-year OS was 73.4%, compared to 52.6% for 2009 stage IIIA disease. Ten-year OS for 2023 stage IIIB2 (pelvic peritoneal involvement), previously 2009 stage IVB, was 49.4%, compared to 18.7% for 2009 stage IVB patients. Akaike information criterion, Bayesian information criterion, and Harrel's concordance index were used to evaluate OS prognostication of each staging system across all stages, with likelihood ratio favoring the 2023 system (p = 0.020).

CONCLUSIONS

With FIGO's 2023 endometrial cancer anatomic and histologic staging system, stage migration is greatest in early-stage disease. New staging groups may offer more precise prognostication. These changes may affect future management.