Functional genomics and epigenomics of atrial fibrillation

Atrial fibrillation: Epigenetic aspects and role of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most frequent arrhythmia and is associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. Pathophysiological aspects consist in the activation of pro-fibrotic signaling and Ca²⁺ handling abnormalities at atrial level. Structural and electrical remodeling creates a substrate for AF by triggering conduction abnormalities and cardiac arrhythmias. The care of AF patients focuses predominantly on anticoagulation, symptoms control and the management of risk factors and comorbidities. The goal of AF therapy points to restore sinus rhythm, re-establish atrioventricular synchrony and improve atrial contribution to the stroke volume. New layer of information to better comprehend AF pathophysiology, and identify targets for novel pharmacological interventions consists of the epigenetic phenomena including, among others, DNA methylation, histone modifications and noncoding RNAs. Moreover, the benefits of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) in diabetic and non-diabetic patients at cardiovascular risk as well as emerging evidence on the ability of SGLT2i to modify epigenetic signature in cardiovascular diseases provide a solid background to investigate a possible role of this drug class in the onset and progression of AF. In this review, following a summary of pathophysiology and management, epigenetic mechanisms in AF and the potential of sodium-glucose SGLT2i in AF patients are discussed.

PRRX1 Loss-of-Function Mutations Underlying Familial Atrial Fibrillation

Background

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common form of clinical cardiac dysrhythmia responsible for thromboembolic cerebral stroke, congestive heart failure, and death. Aggregating evidence highlights the strong genetic basis of AF. Nevertheless, AF is of pronounced genetic heterogeneity, and in an overwhelming majority of patients, the genetic determinants underpinning AF remain elusive.

Methods and Results

By genome‐wide screening with polymorphic microsatellite markers and linkage analysis in a 4‐generation Chinese family affected with autosomal‐dominant AF, a novel locus for AF was mapped to chromosome 1q24.2–q25.1, a 3.20‐cM (≈4.19 Mbp) interval between markers D1S2851 and D1S218, with the greatest 2‐point logarithm of odds score of 4.8165 for the marker D1S452 at recombination fraction=0.00. Whole‐exome sequencing and bioinformatics analyses showed that within the mapping region, only the mutation in the paired related homeobox 1 (PRRX1) gene, NM_022716.4:c.319C>T;(p.Gln107*), cosegregated with AF in the family. In addition, sequencing analyses of PRRX1 in another cohort of 225 unrelated patients with AF revealed a new mutation, NM_022716.4:c.437G>T; (p.Arg146Ile), in a patient. The 2 mutations were absent in 908 control subjects. Biological analyses in HeLa cells demonstrated that the 2 mutants had significantly diminished transactivation on the target genes ISL1 and SHOX2 and markedly decreased ability to bind the promoters of ISL1 and SHOX2 (2 genes causally linked to AF), although with normal intracellular distribution.

Conclusions

This study first indicates that PRRX1 loss‐of‐function mutations predispose to AF, which provides novel insight into the molecular pathogenesis underpinning AF, implying potential implications for precisive prophylaxis and management of AF.