Reconstitution and analyses of RNA interactions with eukaryotic translation initiation factors and ribosomal preinitiation complexes

A dynamic compositional equilibrium governs mRNA recognition by eIF3

Eukaryotic translation initiation factor (eIF) 3 is a multi-subunit protein complex that binds both ribosomes and messenger RNAs (mRNAs) in order to drive a diverse set of mechanistic steps during translation. Despite its importance, a unifying framework explaining how eIF3 performs these numerous activities is lacking. Using single-molecule light scattering microscopy, we demonstrate that Saccharomyces cerevisiae eIF3 is an equilibrium mixture of the full complex, subcomplexes, and subunits. By extending our microscopy approach to an in vitro reconstituted eIF3 and complementing it with biochemical assays, we define the subspecies comprising this equilibrium and show that, rather than being driven by the full complex, mRNA binding by eIF3 is instead driven by the eIF3a subunit within eIF3a-containing subcomplexes. Our findings provide a mechanistic model for the role of eIF3 in the mRNA recruitment step of translation initiation and establish a mechanistic framework for explaining and investigating the other activities of eIF3.

The mechanism of mRNA activation

During translation initiation, messenger RNA molecules must be identified and activated for loading into a ribosome. In this rate-limiting step, the heterotrimeric protein eukaryotic initiation factor eIF4F must recognize and productively interact with the 7-methylguanosine cap at the 5' end of the messenger RNA and subsequently activate the message. Despite its fundamental, regulatory role in gene expression, the molecular events underlying cap recognition and messenger RNA activation remain mysterious. Here, we generate a unique, single-molecule fluorescence imaging system to interrogate the dynamics with which eIF4F discriminates productive and non-productive locations on full-length, native messenger RNA molecules. At the single-molecule level, we observe stochastic sampling of eIF4F along the length of the messenger RNA and identify allosteric communication between the eIF4F subunits which ultimately drive cap-recognition and subsequent activation of the message. Our experiments uncover novel functions for each subunit of eIF4F and we conclude by presenting a model for messenger RNA activation which precisely defines the composition of the activated message. This model provides a general framework for understanding how messenger RNA molecules may be discriminated from one another, and how other RNA-binding proteins may control the efficiency of translation initiation.

mRNA- and factor-driven dynamic variability controls eIF4F-cap recognition for translation initiation

mRNA 5′ cap recognition by eIF4F is a key element of eukaryotic translational control. Kinetic differences in eIF4F–mRNA interactions have long been proposed to mediate translation-efficiency differences between mRNAs, and recent transcriptome-wide studies have revealed significant heterogeneity in eIF4F engagement with differentially-translated mRNAs. However, detailed kinetic information exists only for eIF4F interactions with short model RNAs. We developed and applied single-molecule fluorescence approaches to directly observe real-time Saccharomyces cerevisiae eIF4F subunit interactions with full-length polyadenylated mRNAs. We found that eIF4E–mRNA association rates linearly anticorrelate with mRNA length. eIF4G–mRNA interaction accelerates eIF4E–mRNA association in proportion to mRNA length, as does an eIF4F-independent activity of eIF4A, though cap-proximal secondary structure still plays an important role in defining the final association rates. eIF4F–mRNA interactions remained dominated by effects of eIF4G, but were modulated to different extents for different mRNAs by the presence of eIF4A and ATP. We also found that eIF4A-catalyzed ATP hydrolysis ejects eIF4E, and likely eIF4E•eIF4G from the mRNA after initial eIF4F•mRNA complex formation, suggesting a mechanism to prepare the mRNA 5′ end for ribosome recruitment. Our results support a role for mRNA-specific, factor-driven eIF4F association rates in kinetically controlling translation.

Deletion of the N-Terminal Domain of Yeast Eukaryotic Initiation Factor 4B Reprograms Translation and Reduces Growth in Urea

The yeast eukaryotic initiation factor 4B binds the 40S subunit in translation preinitiation complexes (PICs), promoting mRNA recruitment. Recent evidence indicates yeast mRNAs have variable dependence on eIF4B under optimal growth conditions. Given the ability of eIF4B to promote translation as a function of nutrient conditions in mammalian cells, we wondered if eIF4B activities in translation could alter phenotypes in yeast through differential mRNA selection for translation. Here we compared the effects of disrupting yeast eIF4B RNA- and 40S-binding motifs under ∼1400 growth conditions. The RNA-Recognition Motif (RRM) was dispensable for stress responses, but the 40S-binding N-terminal Domain (NTD) promoted growth in response to stressors requiring robust cellular integrity. In particular, the NTD conferred a strong growth advantage in the presence of urea, which may be important for pathogenesis of related fungal species. Ribosome profiling indicated that similar to complete eIF4B deletion, deletion of the NTD dramatically reduced translation, particularly of those mRNAs with long and highly structured 5-prime untranslated regions. This behavior was observed both with and without urea exposure, but the specific mRNA pool associated with ribosomes in response to urea differed. Deletion of the NTD led to relative increases in ribosome association of shorter transcripts with higher dependence on eIF4G, as was noted previously for eIF4B deletion. Gene ontology analysis indicated that proteins encoded by eIF4B NTD-dependent transcripts were associated with the cellular membrane system and the cell wall, while NTD-independent transcripts encoded proteins associated with cytoplasmic proteins and protein synthesis. This analysis highlighted the difference in structure content of mRNAs encoding membrane versus cytoplasmic housekeeping proteins and the variable reliance of specific gene ontology classes on various initiation factors promoting otherwise similar functions. Together our analyses suggest that deletion of the eIF4B NTD prevents cellular stress responses by affecting the capacity to translate a diverse mRNA pool.