Risk factors for osteoporosis, falls and fractures in hereditary myopathies and sporadic inclusion body myositis - A cross sectional survey

Cross-Sectional Study of Knee Bone Mineral Density and Fragility Fractures in Patients with Neurological Injuries and Neuromuscular Disorders

BACKGROUND

Patients with neurological injury and neuromuscular disorders are at increased risk for osteoporosis and fragility fracture. This cross-sectional study investigated whether knee bone mineral density (BMD) correlates with fragility fracture in patients with neurological injury and neuromuscular injuries.

METHODOLOGY

In this retrospective chart review, 435 participants underwent dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) for BMD analysis. Distal femur and proximal tibial BMD measurements were performed as per the Toronto protocol. Spine, hip, and forearm DXA was performed following the standards of the International Society of Clinical Densitometry, 2019. Blinded and independent clinical evaluations and laboratory exams were performed. Participants were divided into groups with and without fracture confirmed by clinical history and radiography.

RESULTS

Distal femur and proximal tibial BMD were measured in 288/435 (66.2%) participants. Osteoporosis was noted in 138/288 (47.9%) patients. Fractures occurred in 95/435 participants (21.8%), including one fracture in 64/435 participants (14.7%), two fractures in 24/435 participants (5.5%), and greater than two fractures in 7/435 patients (1.6%). Fractures were noted in 23/54 (42.6%) participants with post-polio syndrome, 21/66 with brain injury (31.8%), 3/10 (30%) with brain injury and spinal cord injury, 24/98 (24.5%) with neuromuscular disorders, 9/52 (17.3%) with nontraumatic spinal cord injury, and 15/155 (9.7%) with traumatic spinal cord injury. The median BMD of the knee and hip was lower in participants with fractures. Distal femur and proximal tibial BMD (odds ratio [OR] = 0.02, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.01-0.45) remained independently associated with fragility fracture in multivariable analysis.

CONCLUSION

Proximal tibial and distal femur BMD measurements offered additional information on neurological injury and neuromuscular disorders.

Spatio-temporal gait differences in facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy during single and dual task overground walking - A pilot study

Background

Facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD) is a rare genetic muscle disorder leading to progressive muscle loss over time. Research indicates that this progressive muscular atrophy can negatively impact spatio-temporal gait characteristics, but this is not always the case during early-onset or mild cases of the disease. In addition, the performance of a secondary task during overground walking may elucidate greater deficits in spatio-temporal characteristics of gait. However, such dual task effects on FSHD gait have not been studied thus far.

Aim

The current study aimed to (a) quantify changes in spatio-temporal gait parameters in individuals with FSHD using the Tekscan Strideway gait mat system, (b) measure the dual task (DT) effects on cadence and gait velocity during single task (ST) and DT overground walking in FSHD and healthy controls and (c) investigate the correlation between the gait parameters and the methylation status in FSHD.

Methods

Nine FSHD (M±SD=52.78±14.69 years) and nine nearly matched healthy controls (M±SD=50.11±16.18 years) performed five ST and five DT walking in a pseudo-randomized order. The DT included a serial 7's subtraction task from a random number between 50 and 100. Dependent variables: Cadence (steps/min) and gait velocity (cm/sec) were obtained from Tekscan Strideway (30 Hz, Boston, MA).

Results

The pairwise comparison indicated that cadence was significantly different for both ST (P<0.004) and DT (P<0.02) where FSHD showed lower cadence compared to controls. Gait velocity was also significantly lower for FSHD during ST (P<0.004) and DT (P<0.008). Multilevel modeling (MLM) approach revealed a group by task interaction for cadence (P<0.05) and gait velocity (P<0.001). The interaction showed a significant difference between ST and DT in controls for cadence and gait velocity. However, there was no difference between ST and DT in FSHD. Finally, a comparison of methylation percentage versus gait parameters revealed a significant negative correlation coefficient for cadence but not for gait velocity.

Conclusion

These results indicate specific pairwise differences in both ST and DT walking, observed in the gait parameters as decreased cadence and gait velocity during ST and DT. In addition, the MLM showed that controls exhibited the DT cost as expected but FSHD did not for cadence and gait velocity.

Relevance for Patients

ST appears to be sufficiently challenging in FSHD and results in overall declines in spatio-temporal characteristics of gait. Further research is needed to test this paradigm with early-onset or mild cases to track disease progression and its effects on ambulation.

Osteopenia/osteoporosis develops in the early phase of disease in patients with idiopathic inflammatory myopathies

Objective: To study the relationship between different disease-related variables and bone mineral density (BMD) in patients with idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIMs).Method: Demographic and clinical data were retrospectively collected from the medical records of all patients diagnosed with IIMs during 2003-2018 in the Rheumatology Department, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden. BMD measurements by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) were compared among three patient groups categorized according to the time when DXA was performed in relation to the diagnosis: during the first month, 2-6 months, and 7-24 months after diagnosis.Results: In total, 48 patients were included in the study. BMD correlated positively with body mass index and the presence of myositis-specific autoantibodies. As expected, age and diseases duration had negative associations with BMD. Importantly, osteopenia and osteoporosis were significantly more common in patients who underwent DXA at later time-points of the disease than in those who underwent DXA during the first month after diagnosis.Conclusions: Reduced BMD is common in patients with IIMs. The development of osteopenia/osteoporosis starts in the early phase of myositis (within 6 months), and immediate osteoporosis prophylaxis at diagnosis is necessary.

Fragility fractures and bone mineral density in male patients affected by type 1 and type 2 myotonic dystrophy

Myotonic dystrophy is a multisystemic disorder affecting skeletal muscle. Male patients have an increased risk of fractures and develop a number of endocrine/metabolic impairments known to adversely affect bone health. The aim of this study was primarily to determine the occurrence of fragility fractures and the bone mineralization status (lumbar spine, hip and total body by dual X-ray absorptiometry) in 36 male patients affected with type 1 myotonic dystrophy and 13 male patients affected with type 2 myotonic dystrophy. Fragility fractures occurred in 15 type 1 and 7 type 2 myotonic dystrophy in non-classical osteoporotic sites, such as metatarses. Hip osteopenia was the most frequent finding, particularly in type 2 (n = 6) than type 1 myotonic dystrophy patients (n = 1), while osteoporosis was rare. Patients with type 1 myotonic dystrophy presented higher total body bone mass density than patients with type 2 myotonic dystrophy and healthy controls and lumbar spine was associated positively with the severity of the disease. Gonadic failure, with low testosterone and reduced INSL3 levels, visceral adiposity and insulin resistance correlated with reduced body mass index in both type 1 and type 2 myotonic dystrophic patients. The independent determinant of fragility fractures were low total body mass index, low blood testosterone and low global muscle mass.

Body composition analysis in patients with myotonic dystrophy types 1 and 2

INTRODUCTION

To date, there are only several reports on body composition in myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1) and there are no data for myotonic dystrophy type 2 (DM2). The aim was to analyze body composition of patients with DM1 and DM2, and its association with socio-demographic and clinical features of the diseases.

METHODS

There were no statistical differences in sociodemographic features between 20 DM1 patients and 12 DM2 patients. Body composition was assessed by DEXA (dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry). A three-compartment model was used: bone mineral content (BMC), fat mass (FM), and lean tissue mass (LTM).

RESULTS

Patients with DM1 and DM2 had similar total body mass (TBM), BMC, FM, and LTM. Patients with DM1 had higher trunk-limb fat index (TLFI) in comparison to DM2 patients which indicates visceral fat deposition in DM1 (1.16 ± 0.32 for DM1 vs. 0.87 ± 0.23 for DM2, p < 0.05). Right ribs bone mineral density was lower in DM2 group (0.68 ± 0.07 g/cm² vs. 0.61 ± 0.09 g/cm², p < 0.05). Higher percentage of FM in legs showed correlation with lower strength of the upper leg muscles in DM1 (ρ = - 0.47, p < 0.05). Higher muscle strength in DM2 patients was in correlation with higher bone mineral density (ρ = + 0.62, p < 0.05 for upper arm muscles, ρ = + 0.87, p < 0.01 for lower arm muscles, ρ = + 0.72, p < 0.05 for lower leg muscles).

CONCLUSION

DM1 patients had visceral obesity, and percentage of FM correlated with a degree of muscle weakness in upper legs. In DM2 patients, degree of muscle weakness was in correlation with higher FM index and lower bone mineral density.

Targeting the Muscle-Bone Unit: Filling Two Needs with One Deed in the Treatment of Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

In Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD), the progressive skeletal and cardiac muscle dysfunction and degeneration is accompanied by low bone mineral density and bone fragility. Glucocorticoids, which remain the standard of care for patients with DMD, increase the risk of developing osteoporosis. The scope of this review emphasizes the mutual cohesion and common signaling pathways between bone and skeletal muscle in DMD.

RECENT FINDINGS

The muscle-bone interactions involve bone-derived osteokines, muscle-derived myokines, and dual-origin cytokines that trigger common signaling pathways leading to fibrosis, inflammation, or protein synthesis/degradation. In particular, the triad RANK/RANKL/OPG including receptor activator of NF-kB (RANK), its ligand (RANKL), along with osteoprotegerin (OPG), regulates bone matrix modeling and remodeling pathways and contributes to muscle pathophysiology in DMD. This review discusses the importance of the muscle-bone unit in DMD and covers recent research aimed at determining the muscle-bone interactions that may eventually lead to the development of multifunctional and effective drugs for treating muscle and bone disorders regardless of the underlying genetic mutations in DMD.