How is structural divergence related to evolutionary information?

Easy Not Easy: Comparative Modeling with High-Sequence Identity Templates

Homology modeling is the most common technique to build structural models of a target protein based on the structure of proteins with high-sequence identity and available high-resolution structures. This technique is based on the idea that protein structure shows fewer changes than sequence through evolution. While in this scenario single mutations would minimally perturb the structure, experimental evidence shows otherwise: proteins with high conformational diversity impose a limit of the paradigm of comparative modeling as the same protein sequence can adopt dissimilar three-dimensional structures. These cases present challenges for modeling; at first glance, they may seem to be easy cases, but they have a complexity that is not evident at the sequence level. In this chapter, we address the following questions: Why should we care about conformational diversity? How to consider conformational diversity when doing template-based modeling in a practical way?

Prediction of Protein-Protein Interaction Sites by Multifeature Fusion and RF with mRMR and IFS

Prediction of protein-protein interaction (PPI) sites is one of the most perplexing problems in drug discovery and computational biology. Although significant progress has been made by combining different machine learning techniques with a variety of distinct characteristics, the problem still remains unresolved. In this study, a technique for PPI sites is presented using a random forest (RF) algorithm followed by the minimum redundancy maximal relevance (mRMR) approach, and the method of incremental feature selection (IFS). Physicochemical properties of proteins and the features of the residual disorder, sequence conservation, secondary structure, and solvent accessibility are incorporated. Five 3D structural characteristics are also used to predict PPI sites. Analysis of features shows that 3D structural features such as relative solvent-accessible surface area (RASA) and surface curvature (SC) help in the prediction of PPI sites. Results show that the performance of the proposed predictor is superior to several other state-of-the-art predictors, whose average prediction accuracy is 81.44%, sensitivity is 82.17%, and specificity is 80.71%, respectively. The proposed predictor is expected to become a helpful tool for finding PPI sites, and the feature analysis presented in this study will give useful insights into protein interaction mechanisms.

Impact of protein conformational diversity on AlphaFold predictions

MOTIVATION

After the outstanding breakthrough of AlphaFold in predicting protein 3D models, new questions appeared and remain unanswered. The ensemble nature of proteins, for example, challenges the structural prediction methods because the models should represent a set of conformers instead of single structures. The evolutionary and structural features captured by effective deep learning techniques may unveil the information to generate several diverse conformations from a single sequence. Here, we address the performance of AlphaFold2 predictions obtained through ColabFold under this ensemble paradigm.

RESULTS

Using a curated collection of apo-holo pairs of conformers, we found that AlphaFold2 predicts the holo form of a protein in ∼70% of the cases, being unable to reproduce the observed conformational diversity with the same error for both conformers. More importantly, we found that AlphaFold2's performance worsens with the increasing conformational diversity of the studied protein. This impairment is related to the heterogeneity in the degree of conformational diversity found between different members of the homologous family of the protein under study. Finally, we found that main-chain flexibility associated with apo-holo pairs of conformers negatively correlates with the predicted local model quality score plDDT, indicating that plDDT values in a single 3D model could be used to infer local conformational changes linked to ligand binding transitions.

AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION

Data and code used in this manuscript are publicly available at https://gitlab.com/sbgunq/publications/af2confdiv-oct2021.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Co-evolutionary distance predictions contain flexibility information

MOTIVATION

Co-evolution analysis can be used to accurately predict residue-residue contacts from multiple sequence alignments. The introduction of machine-learning techniques has enabled substantial improvements in precision and a shift from predicting binary contacts to predict distances between pairs of residues. These developments have significantly improved the accuracy of de novo prediction of static protein structures. With AlphaFold2 lifting the accuracy of some predicted protein models close to experimental levels, structure prediction research will move on to other challenges. One of those areas is the prediction of more than one conformation of a protein. Here, we examine the potential of residue-residue distance predictions to be informative of protein flexibility rather than simply static structure.

RESULTS

We used DMPfold to predict distance distributions for every residue pair in a set of proteins that showed both rigid and flexible behaviour. Residue pairs that were in contact in at least one reference structure were classified as rigid, flexible or neither. The predicted distance distribution of each residue pair was analysed for local maxima of probability indicating the most likely distance or distances between a pair of residues. We found that rigid residue pairs tended to have only a single local maximum in their predicted distance distributions while flexible residue pairs more often had multiple local maxima. These results suggest that the shape of predicted distance distributions contains information on the rigidity or flexibility of a protein and its constituent residues.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

FingerprintContacts: Predicting Alternative Conformations of Proteins from Coevolution

Proteins are dynamic molecules which perform diverse molecular functions by adopting different three-dimensional structures. Recent progress in residue-residue contacts prediction opens up new avenues for the de novo protein structure prediction from sequence information. However, it is still difficult to predict more than one conformation from residue-residue contacts alone. This is due to the inability to deconvolve the complex signals of residue-residue contacts, i.e., spatial contacts relevant for protein folding, conformational diversity, and ligand binding. Here, we introduce a machine learning based method, called FingerprintContacts, for extending the capabilities of residue-residue contacts. This algorithm leverages the features of residue-residue contacts, that is, (1) a single conformation outperforms the others in the structural prediction using all the top ranking residue-residue contacts as structural constraints and (2) conformation specific contacts rank lower and constitute a small fraction of residue-residue contacts. We demonstrate the capabilities of FingerprintContacts on eight ligand binding proteins with varying conformational motions. Furthermore, FingerprintContacts identifies small clusters of residue-residue contacts which are preferentially located in the dynamically fluctuating regions. With the rapid growth in protein sequence information, we expect FingerprintContacts to be a powerful first step in structural understanding of protein functional mechanisms.

Protein ensembles link genotype to phenotype

Classically, phenotype is what is observed, and genotype is the genetic makeup. Statistical studies aim to project phenotypic likelihoods of genotypic patterns. The traditional genotype-to-phenotype theory embraces the view that the encoded protein shape together with gene expression level largely determines the resulting phenotypic trait. Here, we point out that the molecular biology revolution at the turn of the century explained that the gene encodes not one but ensembles of conformations, which in turn spell all possible gene-associated phenotypes. The significance of a dynamic ensemble view is in understanding the linkage between genetic change and the gained observable physical or biochemical characteristics. Thus, despite the transformative shift in our understanding of the basis of protein structure and function, the literature still commonly relates to the classical genotype-phenotype paradigm. This is important because an ensemble view clarifies how even seemingly small genetic alterations can lead to pleiotropic traits in adaptive evolution and in disease, why cellular pathways can be modified in monogenic and polygenic traits, and how the environment may tweak protein function.

Exploring Protein Conformational Diversity

The native state of proteins is composed of conformers in dynamical equilibrium. In this chapter, different issues related to conformational diversity are explored using a curated and experimentally based database called CoDNaS (Conformational Diversity in the Native State). This database is a collection of redundant structures for the same sequence. CoDNaS estimates the degree of conformational diversity using different global and local structural similarity measures. It allows the user to explore how structural differences among conformers change as a function of several structural features providing further biological information. This chapter explores the measurement of conformational diversity and its relationship with sequence divergence. Also, it discusses how proteins with high conformational diversity could affect homology modeling techniques.