1
|
Zhang T, Tan S, Tang N, Li Y, Zhang C, Sun J, Guo Y, Gao H, Cai Y, Sun W, Wang C, Fu L, Ma H, Wu Y, Hu X, Zhang X, Gee P, Yan W, Zhao Y, Chen Q, Guo B, Wang H, Zhang YE. Heterologous survey of 130 DNA transposons in human cells highlights their functional divergence and expands the genome engineering toolbox. Cell 2024; 187:3741-3760.e30. [PMID: 38843831 DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2024.05.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2023] [Revised: 03/11/2024] [Accepted: 05/02/2024] [Indexed: 07/14/2024]
Abstract
Experimental studies on DNA transposable elements (TEs) have been limited in scale, leading to a lack of understanding of the factors influencing transposition activity, evolutionary dynamics, and application potential as genome engineering tools. We predicted 130 active DNA TEs from 102 metazoan genomes and evaluated their activity in human cells. We identified 40 active (integration-competent) TEs, surpassing the cumulative number (20) of TEs found previously. With this unified comparative data, we found that the Tc1/mariner superfamily exhibits elevated activity, potentially explaining their pervasive horizontal transfers. Further functional characterization of TEs revealed additional divergence in features such as insertion bias. Remarkably, in CAR-T therapy for hematological and solid tumors, Mariner2_AG (MAG), the most active DNA TE identified, largely outperformed two widely used vectors, the lentiviral vector and the TE-based vector SB100X. Overall, this study highlights the varied transposition features and evolutionary dynamics of DNA TEs and increases the TE toolbox diversity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tongtong Zhang
- Key Laboratory of Organ Regeneration and Reconstruction, State Key Laboratory of Stem Cell and Reproductive Biology, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China; University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China; Institute for Stem Cell and Regeneration, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China
| | - Shengjun Tan
- Key Laboratory of Zoological Systematics and Evolution, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China
| | - Na Tang
- Key Laboratory of Organ Regeneration and Reconstruction, State Key Laboratory of Stem Cell and Reproductive Biology, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China; Institute for Stem Cell and Regeneration, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China; Beijing Institute for Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine, Beijing 100101, China
| | - Yuanqing Li
- University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China; Key Laboratory of Zoological Systematics and Evolution, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China
| | - Chenze Zhang
- National Key Laboratory of Efficacy and Mechanism on Chinese Medicine for Metabolic Diseases, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing 100029, China
| | - Jing Sun
- Key Laboratory of Organ Regeneration and Reconstruction, State Key Laboratory of Stem Cell and Reproductive Biology, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China; University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China; Institute for Stem Cell and Regeneration, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China
| | - Yanyan Guo
- University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China; Key Laboratory of Zoological Systematics and Evolution, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China
| | - Hui Gao
- Rengene Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Beijing 100036, China
| | - Yujia Cai
- Key Laboratory of Organ Regeneration and Reconstruction, State Key Laboratory of Stem Cell and Reproductive Biology, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China; University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China; Institute for Stem Cell and Regeneration, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China
| | - Wen Sun
- Key Laboratory of Organ Regeneration and Reconstruction, State Key Laboratory of Stem Cell and Reproductive Biology, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China; Institute for Stem Cell and Regeneration, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China; Beijing Institute for Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine, Beijing 100101, China
| | - Chenxin Wang
- Key Laboratory of Organ Regeneration and Reconstruction, State Key Laboratory of Stem Cell and Reproductive Biology, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China; Institute for Stem Cell and Regeneration, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China; Beijing Institute for Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine, Beijing 100101, China
| | - Liangzheng Fu
- Key Laboratory of Organ Regeneration and Reconstruction, State Key Laboratory of Stem Cell and Reproductive Biology, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China; University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China; Institute for Stem Cell and Regeneration, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China
| | - Huijing Ma
- Key Laboratory of Zoological Systematics and Evolution, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China
| | - Yachao Wu
- Key Laboratory of Organ Regeneration and Reconstruction, State Key Laboratory of Stem Cell and Reproductive Biology, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China; University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China; Institute for Stem Cell and Regeneration, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China
| | - Xiaoxuan Hu
- Key Laboratory of Organ Regeneration and Reconstruction, State Key Laboratory of Stem Cell and Reproductive Biology, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China; University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China; Institute for Stem Cell and Regeneration, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China
| | - Xuechun Zhang
- Key Laboratory of Organ Regeneration and Reconstruction, State Key Laboratory of Stem Cell and Reproductive Biology, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China; University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China; Institute for Stem Cell and Regeneration, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China
| | - Peter Gee
- MaxCyte Inc., Rockville, MD 20850, USA
| | - Weihua Yan
- Cold Spring Biotech Corp., Beijing 100031, China
| | - Yahui Zhao
- Key Laboratory of Zoological Systematics and Evolution, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China
| | - Qiang Chen
- Department of Biotherapy, Cancer Center and State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China
| | - Baocheng Guo
- University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China; Key Laboratory of Zoological Systematics and Evolution, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China; Academy of Plateau Science and Sustainability, Qinghai Normal University, Xining 810008, China
| | - Haoyi Wang
- Key Laboratory of Organ Regeneration and Reconstruction, State Key Laboratory of Stem Cell and Reproductive Biology, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China; University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China; Institute for Stem Cell and Regeneration, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China; Beijing Institute for Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine, Beijing 100101, China.
| | - Yong E Zhang
- University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China; Key Laboratory of Zoological Systematics and Evolution, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Guo M, Addy GA, Yang N, Asare E, Wu H, Saleh AA, Shi S, Gao B, Song C. PiggyBac Transposon Mining in the Small Genomes of Animals. BIOLOGY 2023; 13:24. [PMID: 38248455 PMCID: PMC10813416 DOI: 10.3390/biology13010024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2023] [Accepted: 12/29/2023] [Indexed: 01/23/2024]
Abstract
TEs, including DNA transposons, are major contributors of genome expansions, and have played a very significant role in shaping the evolution of animal genomes, due to their capacity to jump from one genomic position to the other. In this study, we investigated the evolution landscapes of PB transposons, including their distribution, diversity, activity and structure organization in 79 species of small (compact) genomes of animals comprising both vertebrate and invertebrates. Overall, 212 PB transposon types were detected from almost half (37) of the total number of the small genome species (79) investigated. The detected PB transposon types, which were unevenly distributed in various genera and phyla, have been classified into seven distinct clades or families with good bootstrap support (>80%). The PB transposon types that were identified have a length ranging from 1.23 kb to 9.51 kb. They encode transposases of approximately ≥500 amino acids in length, and possess terminal inverted repeats (TIRs) ranging from 4 bp to 24 bp. Though some of the transposon types have long TIRs (528 bp), they still maintain the consistent and reliable 4 bp target site duplication (TSD) of TTAA. However, PiggyBac-2_Cvir transposon originating from the Crassostrea virginica species exhibits a unique TSD of TATG. The TIRs of the transposons in all the seven families display high divergence, with a highly conserved 5' end motif. The core transposase domains (DDD) were better conserved among the seven different families compared to the other protein domains, which were less prevalent in the vertebrate genome. The divergent evolution dynamics analysis also indicated that the majority of the PB transposon types identified in this study are either relatively young or old, with some being active. Additionally, numerous invasions of PB transposons were found in the genomes of both vertebrate and invertebrate animals. The data reveals that the PB superfamily is widely distributed in these species. PB transposons exhibit high diversity and activity in the small genomes of animals, and might play a crucial role in shaping the evolution of these small genomes of animals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mengke Guo
- College of Animal Science & Technology, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, China; (M.G.); (G.A.A.); (N.Y.); (E.A.); (A.A.S.); (S.S.); (B.G.)
| | - George A. Addy
- College of Animal Science & Technology, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, China; (M.G.); (G.A.A.); (N.Y.); (E.A.); (A.A.S.); (S.S.); (B.G.)
| | - Naisu Yang
- College of Animal Science & Technology, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, China; (M.G.); (G.A.A.); (N.Y.); (E.A.); (A.A.S.); (S.S.); (B.G.)
| | - Emmanuel Asare
- College of Animal Science & Technology, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, China; (M.G.); (G.A.A.); (N.Y.); (E.A.); (A.A.S.); (S.S.); (B.G.)
| | - Han Wu
- Department of Immunology, School of Medicine, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518060, China;
| | - Ahmed A. Saleh
- College of Animal Science & Technology, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, China; (M.G.); (G.A.A.); (N.Y.); (E.A.); (A.A.S.); (S.S.); (B.G.)
- Animal and Fish Production Department, Faculty of Agriculture (Alshatby), Alexandria University, Alexandria City 11865, Egypt
| | - Shasha Shi
- College of Animal Science & Technology, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, China; (M.G.); (G.A.A.); (N.Y.); (E.A.); (A.A.S.); (S.S.); (B.G.)
| | - Bo Gao
- College of Animal Science & Technology, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, China; (M.G.); (G.A.A.); (N.Y.); (E.A.); (A.A.S.); (S.S.); (B.G.)
| | - Chengyi Song
- College of Animal Science & Technology, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, China; (M.G.); (G.A.A.); (N.Y.); (E.A.); (A.A.S.); (S.S.); (B.G.)
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Xu Y, Tang Y, Feng W, Yang Y, Cui Z. Comparative Analysis of Transposable Elements Reveals the Diversity of Transposable Elements in Decapoda and Their Effects on Genomic Evolution. MARINE BIOTECHNOLOGY (NEW YORK, N.Y.) 2023; 25:1136-1146. [PMID: 37923816 DOI: 10.1007/s10126-023-10265-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/20/2023] [Accepted: 10/17/2023] [Indexed: 11/06/2023]
Abstract
Transposable elements (TEs) are mobile genetic elements that exist in the host genome and exert considerable influence on the evolution of the host genome. Since crustaceans, including decapoda, are considered ideal models for studying the relationship between adaptive evolution and TEs, TEs were identified and classified in the genomes of eight decapoda species and one diplostraca species (as the outgroup) using two strategies, namely homology-based annotation and de novo annotation. The statistics and classification of TEs showed that their proportion in the genome and their taxonomic composition in decapoda were different. Moreover, correlation analysis and transcriptome data demonstrated that there were more PIF-Harbinger TEs in the genomes of Eriocheir sinensis and Scylla paramamosain, and the expression patterns of PIF-Harbingers were significantly altered under air exposure stress conditions. These results signaled that PIF-Harbingers expanded in the genome of E. sinensis and S. paramamosain and might be related to their air exposure tolerance levels. Meanwhile, sequence alignment revealed that some Jockey-like sequences (JLSs) with high similarity to specific regions of the White spot syndrome virus (WSSV) genome existed in all eight decapod species. At the same time, phylogenetic comparison exposed that the phylogenetic tree constructed by JLSs was not in agreement with that of the species tree, and the distribution of each branch was significantly different. The abovementioned results signaled that these WSSV-specific JLSs might transfer horizontally and contribute to the emergence of WSSV. This study accumulated data for expanding research on TEs in decapod species and also provided new insights and future direction for the breeding of stress-resistant and disease-resistant crab breeds.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuanfeng Xu
- School of Marine Sciences, Ningbo University, Ningbo, 315020, China
- Wuxi Fisheries College, Nanjing Agricultural University, Wuxi, 214081, China
- Key Laboratory of Freshwater Fisheries and Germplasm Resources Utilization, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Freshwater Fisheries Research Center, Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences, Wuxi, 214081, China
| | - Yongkai Tang
- Wuxi Fisheries College, Nanjing Agricultural University, Wuxi, 214081, China
- Key Laboratory of Freshwater Fisheries and Germplasm Resources Utilization, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Freshwater Fisheries Research Center, Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences, Wuxi, 214081, China
| | - Wenrong Feng
- Wuxi Fisheries College, Nanjing Agricultural University, Wuxi, 214081, China
- Key Laboratory of Freshwater Fisheries and Germplasm Resources Utilization, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Freshwater Fisheries Research Center, Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences, Wuxi, 214081, China
| | - Yanan Yang
- School of Marine Sciences, Ningbo University, Ningbo, 315020, China.
| | - Zhaoxia Cui
- School of Marine Sciences, Ningbo University, Ningbo, 315020, China
- Laboratory for Marine Biology and Biotechnology, Qingdao National Laboratory for Marine Science and Technology, Qingdao, 266071, China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Shi S, Puzakov MV, Puzakova LV, Ulupova YN, Xiang K, Wang B, Gao B, Song C. Hiker, a new family of DNA transposons encoding transposases with DD35E motifs, displays a distinct phylogenetic relationship with most known DNA transposon families of IS630-Tc1-mariner (ITm). Mol Phylogenet Evol 2023; 188:107906. [PMID: 37586577 DOI: 10.1016/j.ympev.2023.107906] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2023] [Revised: 08/13/2023] [Accepted: 08/13/2023] [Indexed: 08/18/2023]
Abstract
DNA transposons play a crucial role in determining the size and structure of eukaryotic genomes. In this study, a new family of IS630-Tc1-mariner (ITm) DNA transposons, named Hiker (HK), was identified. HK is characterized by a DD35E catalytic domain and is distinct from all previously known families of the ITm group. Phylogenetic analyses showed that DD35E/Hiker forms a monophyletic clade with DD34E/Gambol, indicating that they may represent a separate superfamily of ITm. A total of 178 Hiker species were identified, with 170 found mainly in Actinopterygii, one in Chondrichthyes, six in Anura and one in Mollusca. Gambol (GM), on the other hand, are found in invertebrates, with 18 in Arthropoda and one in Platyhelminthes. Hiker transposons have a total length ranging from 2.14 to 3.67 kb and contain a single open reading frame that encodes a protein of approximately 370 amino acids (range 311-413 aa). They are flanked by short terminal inverted repeats (TIRs) of 16-30 base pairs and two base pair (TA) target-site duplications. In contrast, most transposons of the Gambol family have a total length of 1.35-5.96 kb, encode a transposase protein of approximately 350 amino acids (range 306-374 aa), and are flanked by TIRs that range from 32 to 1097 bp in length. Both Hiker and Gambol transposases have several conserved motifs, including helix-turn-helix (HTH) motifs and a DDE domain. Our study observed multiple amplification waves and repeated horizontal transfer (HT) events of HK transposons in vertebrate genomes, indicating their role in diversifying and shaping the genomes of Actinopterygii, Chondrichthyes, and Anura. Conversely, GM transposons showed few Horizontal transfer events. According to cell-based transposition assays, most HK transposons are likely inactive due to the truncated DNA binding domains of their transposases. We present an updated classification of the ITm group based on these findings, which will enhance the understanding of both the evolution of ITm transposons and that of their hosts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shasha Shi
- College of Animal Science & Technology, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, Jiangsu 225009, China
| | - Mikhail V Puzakov
- A.O. Kovalevsky Institute of Biology of the Southern Seas of RAS, Lenninsky ave, 38 119991, Moscow, Russia
| | - Ludmila V Puzakova
- A.O. Kovalevsky Institute of Biology of the Southern Seas of RAS, Lenninsky ave, 38 119991, Moscow, Russia
| | - Yulia N Ulupova
- A.O. Kovalevsky Institute of Biology of the Southern Seas of RAS, Lenninsky ave, 38 119991, Moscow, Russia
| | - Kuilin Xiang
- College of Animal Science & Technology, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, Jiangsu 225009, China
| | - Binqing Wang
- College of Animal Science & Technology, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, Jiangsu 225009, China
| | - Bo Gao
- College of Animal Science & Technology, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, Jiangsu 225009, China
| | - Chengyi Song
- College of Animal Science & Technology, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, Jiangsu 225009, China.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Xiang K, Puzakov M, Shi S, Diaby M, Ullah N, Gao B, Song C. Mosquito ( MS), a DD37E Family of Tc1/ Mariner, Displaying a Distinct Evolution Profile from DD37E/ TRT and DD37E/ L18. Genes (Basel) 2023; 14:1379. [PMID: 37510284 PMCID: PMC10379824 DOI: 10.3390/genes14071379] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2023] [Revised: 06/26/2023] [Accepted: 06/26/2023] [Indexed: 07/30/2023] Open
Abstract
Diverse Tc1/mariner elements with the DD37E signature have been detected. However, their evolutionary relationship and profiles are largely unknown. Using bioinformatics methods, we defined the evolution profile of a Tc1/Mariner family, which harbors the catalytic domain with the DD37E signature, and renamed it DD37E/Mosquito (MS). MS transposons form a separate monophyletic clade in the phylogenetic tree, distinct from the other two groups of elements with the DD37E signature, DD37E/L18 and DD37E/TRT (transposon related to Tc1), and represent a very different taxonomic distribution from that of DD37E/TRT. MS is only detected in invertebrate and is mostly present in Arthropoda, as well as in Cnidaria, Ctenophora, Mollusca, Nematoda, and Platyhelminthes, with a total length of about 1.3 kb, containing an open reading frame (ORF) encoding about 340 amino acids transposases, with a conserved DD37E catalytic domain. The terminal inverted repeat (TIR) lengths range from 19 bp to 203 bp, and the target site duplication (TSD) is TA. We also identified few occurrences of MS horizontal transfers (HT) across lineages of diptera. In this paper, the distribution characteristics, structural characteristics, phylogenetic evolution, and horizontal transfer of the MS family are fully analyzed, which is conducive to supplementing and improving the Tc1/Mariner superfamily and excavating active transposons.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kuilin Xiang
- College of Animal Science and Technology, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, China
| | - Mikhail Puzakov
- A.O. Kovalevsky Institute of Biology of the Southern Seas of RAS, Lenninsky Ave, 38, Moscow 119991, Russia
| | - Shasha Shi
- College of Animal Science and Technology, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, China
| | - Mohamed Diaby
- College of Animal Science and Technology, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, China
| | - Numan Ullah
- College of Animal Science and Technology, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, China
| | - Bo Gao
- College of Animal Science and Technology, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, China
| | - Chengyi Song
- College of Animal Science and Technology, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, China
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Li X, Guan Z, Wang F, Wang Y, Asare E, Shi S, Lin Z, Ji T, Gao B, Song C. Evolution of piggyBac Transposons in Apoidea. INSECTS 2023; 14:402. [PMID: 37103217 PMCID: PMC10140906 DOI: 10.3390/insects14040402] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2023] [Revised: 04/15/2023] [Accepted: 04/19/2023] [Indexed: 06/19/2023]
Abstract
In this study, we investigated the presence of piggyBac (PB) transposons in 44 bee genomes from the Apoidea order, which is a superfamily within the Hymenoptera, which includes a large number of bee species crucial for pollination. We annotated the PB transposons in these 44 bee genomes and examined their evolution profiles, including structural characteristics, distribution, diversity, activity, and abundance. The mined PB transposons were divided into three clades, with uneven distribution in each genus of PB transposons in Apoidea. The complete PB transposons we discovered are around 2.23-3.52 kb in length and encode transposases of approximately 580 aa, with terminal inverted repeats (TIRs) of about 14 bp and 4 bp (TTAA) target-site duplications. Long TIRs (200 bp, 201 bp, and 493 bp) were also detected in some species of bees. The DDD domains of the three transposon types were more conserved, while the other protein domains were less conserved. Generally, most PB transposons showed low abundance in the genomes of Apoidea. Divergent evolution dynamics of PB were observed in the genomes of Apoidea. PB transposons in some identified species were relatively young, whiles others were older and with some either active or inactive. In addition, multiple invasions of PB were also detected in some genomes of Apoidea. Our findings highlight the contribution of PB transposons to genomic variation in these species and suggest their potential as candidates for future gene transfer tools.
Collapse
|
7
|
Horizontal Transfer and Evolutionary Profiles of Two Tc1/DD34E Transposons ( ZB and SB) in Vertebrates. Genes (Basel) 2022; 13:genes13122239. [PMID: 36553507 PMCID: PMC9777934 DOI: 10.3390/genes13122239] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2022] [Revised: 11/19/2022] [Accepted: 11/25/2022] [Indexed: 12/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Both ZeBrafish (ZB), a recently identified DNA transposon in the zebrafish genome, and SB, a reconstructed transposon originally discovered in several fish species, are known to exhibit high transposition activity in vertebrate cells. Although a similar structural organization was observed for ZB and SB transposons, the evolutionary profiles of their homologs in various species remain unknown. In the present study, we compared their taxonomic ranges, structural arrangements, sequence identities, evolution dynamics, and horizontal transfer occurrences in vertebrates. In total, 629 ZB and 366 SB homologs were obtained and classified into four distinct clades, named ZB, ZB-like, SB, and SB-like. They displayed narrow taxonomic distributions in eukaryotes, and were mostly found in vertebrates, Actinopterygii in particular tended to be the major reservoir hosts of these transposons. Similar structural features and high sequence identities were observed for transposons and transposase, notably homologous to the SB and ZB elements. The genomic sequences that flank the ZB and SB transposons in the genomes revealed highly conserved integration profiles with strong preferential integration into AT repeats. Both SB and ZB transposons experienced horizontal transfer (HT) events, which were most common in Actinopterygii. Our current study helps to increase our understanding of the evolutionary properties and histories of SB and ZB transposon families in animals.
Collapse
|