The functional GRHL3-filaggrin axis maintains a tumor differentiation potential and influences drug sensitivity

Navigating therapeutic strategies: HPV classification in head and neck cancer

The World Health Organisation recognised human papillomavirus (HPV) as the cause of multiple cancers, including head and neck cancers. HPV is a double-stranded DNA virus, and its viral gene expression can be controlled after infection by cellular and viral promoters. In cancer cells, the HPV genome is detected as either integrated into the host genome, episomal (extrachromosomal), or a mixture of integrated and episomal. Viral integration requires the breakage of both viral and host DNA, and the integration rate correlates with the level of DNA damage. Interestingly, patients with HPV-positive head and neck cancers generally have a good prognosis except for a group of patients with fully integrated HPV who show worst clinical outcomes. Those patients present with lowered expression of viral genes and limited infiltration of cytotoxic T cells. An impediment to effective therapy applications in the clinic is the sole testing for HPV positivity without considering the HPV integration status. This review will discuss HPV integration as a potential determinant of response to therapies in head and neck cancers and highlight to the field a novel therapeutic avenue that would reduce the cancer burden and improve patient survival.

Transcription factor-target gene regulatory network analysis in human lung adenocarcinoma

Background

Transcription factors (TFs) play a crucial role in the occurrence and progression of lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD), and targeting TFs is an important direction for treating LUAD. However, targeting a single TF often fails to achieve satisfactory therapeutic outcomes. Furthermore, the regulatory TF-target gene networks involved in the development of LUAD is complex and not yet fully understood.

Methods

In this study, we performed RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) to analyze the transcriptome profile of human LUAD tissues and matched adjacent nontumor tissues. We selected the differentially expressed TFs, performed enrichment analysis and survival curve analysis, and predicted the regulatory networks of the top differential TFs with their target genes. Finally, alternative splicing analyses were also performed.

Results

We found that TFs GRHL3, SIX1, SIX2, SPDEF, and ETV4 were upregulated, while TAL1, EPAS1, SOX17, NR4A1, and EGR3 were significantly downregulated in LUAD tissues compared to normal tissues. We propose a potential GRHL3-CDH15-Wnt-β-catenin pro-oncogenic signaling axis and a potential TAL1-ADAMTS1-vascular antioncogenic signaling axis. In addition, we found that alternative splicing of intron retention (IR), approximate IR (XIR), multi-IR (MIR), approximate MIR (XMIR), and approximate alternative exon ends (XAE) showed abnormally increased frequencies in LUAD tissues.

Conclusions

These findings revealed a novel TF-target gene regulatory axis related to tumorigenesis and provided potential therapeutic targets and mechanisms for LUAD.

YBX1 integration of oncogenic PI3K/mTOR signalling regulates the fitness of malignant epithelial cells

In heterogeneous head and neck cancer (HNC), subtype-specific treatment regimens are currently missing. An integrated analysis of patient HNC subtypes using single-cell sequencing and proteome profiles reveals an epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) signature within the epithelial cancer-cell population. The EMT signature coincides with PI3K/mTOR inactivation in the mesenchymal subtype. Conversely, the signature is suppressed in epithelial cells of the basal subtype which exhibits hyperactive PI3K/mTOR signalling. We further identify YBX1 phosphorylation, downstream of the PI3K/mTOR pathway, restraining basal-like cancer cell proliferation. In contrast, YBX1 acts as a safeguard against the proliferation-to-invasion switch in mesenchymal-like epithelial cancer cells, and its loss accentuates partial-EMT and in vivo invasion. Interestingly, phospho-YBX1 that is mutually exclusive to partial-EMT, emerges as a prognostic marker for overall patient outcomes. These findings create a unique opportunity to sensitise mesenchymal cancer cells to PI3K/mTOR inhibitors by shifting them towards a basal-like subtype as a promising therapeutic approach against HNC.

Association of FLG mutation with tumor mutation load and clinical outcomes in patients with gastric cancer

Background: Stomach adenocarcinoma (STAD) is one of the most frequently diagnosed cancers in the world with a poor prognosis due to genetic heterogeneity. The present study aimed to explore potential prognostic predictors and therapeutic targets that can be used for STAD treatment.

Methods: We collected relevant data of STAD patients from the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), including somatic mutation, transcriptome, and survival data. We performed a series of analyses such as tumor mutational burden (TMB), immune infiltration, and copy number variation (CNV) analysis to evaluate the potential mechanism of filaggrin (FLG) mutation in gastric cancer. Gene ontology (GO), Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) analysis, and gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) were performed for annotation of differentially expressed genes (DEGs). The STRING online database was used to construct the protein–protein interaction (PPI) and ceRNA network and hub genes were identified. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were used to determine the effect of selected DEGs on tumor prognosis.

Results: The FLG-mutant group (FLG-MT) showed a higher mutation load and immunogenicity in gastric cancer. GO and KEGG analyses identified and ranked unique biologic processes and immune-related pathway maps that correlated with the FLG-mutant target. GSEA analysis showed that several tumorigenesis and metastasis-related pathways were indeed enriched in FLG-mutant tumor tissue. Both cell cycle–related pathways and the DNA damage and repair associated pathways were also enriched in the FLG-MT group. The FLG mutations resulted in increased gastric cancer sensitivity to 24 chemotherapeutic drugs. The ceRNA network was established using Cytoscape and the PPI network was established in the STRING database. The results of the prognostic information further demonstrated that the OS and DFS were significantly higher in FLG mutation carriers, and the FLG gene mutation might be a protective factor.

Conclusion: The multiple molecular mechanisms of the FLG gene in STAD are worthy of further investigation and may reveal novel therapeutic targets and biomarkers for STAD treatment.

Growth regulated oncogene-α contribute to EMT/MMPs pathway by binding its receptors in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

Squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) is the most common malignant tumor of the head and neck and generally detected in the late stages when the cancer has advanced, and therefore has a poor prognosis and survival rate. A high expression of growth-related oncogene alpha (Groα) is associated with tumor metastasis and invasion and the poor survival rate of patients. Microarray reveals that Groα exhibits a cancer-specific response in HNSCC. Quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) results concerning the mRNA expression of Groα in HNSCC tissues; indicate that Groα was more highly expressed in HNSCC than in non-cancerous matched tissue (NCMT). The serum of HNSCC patients and healthy subjects demonstrates that the expression of Groα in the HNSCC patients significantly exceeded than in healthy subjects. Furthermore, exposure Groα to stimulated the proliferation, clonogenicity and migration with HNSCC cells (SCC4, SCC9, SCC25 and OECM-1), yielding a stronger response than in non-malignant HaCaT and DOK cells. A high expression of Groα and its receptors CXCR1/2 (chemokine (C-X-C motif) receptor) in HNSCC tissues are highly correlated with tumor progression stage and metastasis. Following the treatment of SCC25 and OECM-1 cells with Groα, β-catenin, matrix metalloproteinases (MMP)-2, MMP-7 and MMP-9 expressions significantly increased but E-cadherin expression was slightly decreased, suggesting that the EMT and metastasis processes were activated by Groα. These findings constitute the first evidence that Groα promotes epithelial mesenchymal transition (EMT) and MMPs expressions in HNSCC via activating CXCR1/2, suggesting a role for Groα in mediating metastasis and its potential as a therapeutic target.

Grainyhead-like (Grhl) Target Genes in Development and Cancer

Grainyhead-like (GRHL) factors are essential, highly conserved transcription factors (TFs) that regulate processes common to both natural cellular behaviours during embryogenesis, and de-regulation of growth and survival pathways in cancer. Serving to drive the transcription, and therefore activation of multiple co-ordinating pathways, the three GRHL family members (GRHL1-3) are a critical conduit for modulating the molecular landscape that guides cellular decision-making processes during proliferation, epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) and migration. Animal models and in vitro approaches harbouring GRHL loss or gain-of-function are key research tools to understanding gene function, which gives confidence that resultant phenotypes and cellular behaviours may be translatable to humans. Critically, identifying and characterising the target genes to which these factors bind is also essential, as they allow us to discover and understand novel genetic pathways that could ultimately be used as targets for disease diagnosis, drug discovery and therapeutic strategies. GRHL1-3 and their transcriptional targets have been shown to drive comparable cellular processes in Drosophila, C. elegans, zebrafish and mice, and have recently also been implicated in the aetiology and/or progression of a number of human congenital disorders and cancers of epithelial origin. In this review, we will summarise the state of knowledge pertaining to the role of the GRHL family target genes in both development and cancer, primarily through understanding the genetic pathways transcriptionally regulated by these factors across disparate disease contexts.

The Balance between Differentiation and Terminal Differentiation Maintains Oral Epithelial Homeostasis

Simple Summary

Oral cancer affecting the oral cavity represents the most common cancer of the head and neck region. Oral cancer develops in a multistep process in which normal cells gradually accumulate genetic and epigenetic modifications to evolve into a malignant disease. Mortality for oral cancer patients is high and morbidity has a significant long-term impact on the health and wellbeing of affected individuals, typically resulting in facial disfigurement and a loss of the ability to speak, chew, taste, and swallow. The limited scope to which current treatments are able to control oral cancer underlines the need for novel therapeutic strategies. This review highlights the molecular differences between oral cell proliferation, differentiation and terminal differentiation, defines terminal differentiation as an important tumour suppressive mechanism and establishes a rationale for clinical investigation of differentiation-paired therapies that may improve outcomes in oral cancer.

Abstract

The oral epithelium is one of the fastest repairing and continuously renewing tissues. Stem cell activation within the basal layer of the oral epithelium fuels the rapid proliferation of multipotent progenitors. Stem cells first undergo asymmetric cell division that requires tightly controlled and orchestrated differentiation networks to maintain the pool of stem cells while producing progenitors fated for differentiation. Rapidly expanding progenitors subsequently commit to advanced differentiation programs towards terminal differentiation, a process that regulates the structural integrity and homeostasis of the oral epithelium. Therefore, the balance between differentiation and terminal differentiation of stem cells and their progeny ensures progenitors commitment to terminal differentiation and prevents epithelial transformation and oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). A recent comprehensive molecular characterization of OSCC revealed that a disruption of terminal differentiation factors is indeed a common OSCC event and is superior to oncogenic activation. Here, we discuss the role of differentiation and terminal differentiation in maintaining oral epithelial homeostasis and define terminal differentiation as a critical tumour suppressive mechanism. We further highlight factors with crucial terminal differentiation functions and detail the underlying consequences of their loss. Switching on terminal differentiation in differentiated progenitors is likely to represent an extremely promising novel avenue that may improve therapeutic interventions against OSCC.