1
|
Seppänen AV, Daniel F, Houzard S, Le Bihan C, Coldefy M, Gandré C. The double burden of severe mental illness and cancer: a population-based study on colorectal cancer care pathways from screening to end-of-life care. Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci 2024; 33:e27. [PMID: 38747198 PMCID: PMC11362684 DOI: 10.1017/s2045796024000234] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2023] [Revised: 01/29/2024] [Accepted: 03/22/2024] [Indexed: 09/01/2024] Open
Abstract
AIMS Cancer is one of the main causes of death in persons with severe mental illness (SMI). Although their cancer incidence is similar, or sometimes even potentially lower compared to the general population, their cancer mortality remains higher. The role of healthcare provision and care equity in this mortality is increasingly being addressed in research, but available studies are limited in their scope. In this context, our aim was to compare colorectal cancer (CRC) care pathways from screening to end-of-life care in patients with and without pre-existing SMI on a national scale. METHODS This research leverages real-world data from the French national health claims database, covering the entire population, to assess cancer screening, diagnosis, treatment and post-treatment follow-up as well as quality of care (QOC) pathways among patients with incident CRC in 2015-2018, considering whether they had pre-existing SMI. We matched patients with SMI with three patients without - on age, sex, region of residence, year of cancer incidence and cancer type and location at presentation - as well as nationally established quality of CRC care indicators and regression models adjusting for relevant socio-economic, clinical and care provider-related covariates. RESULTS Among patients with incident CRC, 1,532 individuals with pre-existing SMI were matched with individuals without SMI. After adjusting for covariates, both colon and rectal cancer patients with SMI were less likely to participate in the national CRC screening programme and to receive advanced diagnostic examinations (e.g., colonoscopies and several complementary diagnostic examinations). They also had lower odds of receiving combined treatments (e.g., neoadjuvant chemotherapy, radiotherapy and excision) and of having access to targeted therapy or capecitabine but higher odds for invasive care (e.g., stoma). Colon cancer patients with SMI were also more likely to have no treatment at all, and rectal cancer patients with SMI were less likely to receive post-treatment follow-up. Suboptimal QOC was observed for both groups of patients, but to a higher extent for patients with SMI, with statistically significant differences for indicators focusing on diagnosis and post-treatment follow-up. CONCLUSIONS Our findings reveal discrepancies across the care continuum of CRC between individuals with and without SMI and provide initial avenues on where to focus future efforts to address them, notably at the entry and exit stages of cancer care pathways, while calling for further research on the mechanisms preventing equity of physical healthcare for individuals with SMI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A.-V. Seppänen
- Institut de Recherche et Documentation en Économie de la Santé (Institute for Research and Information in Health Economics – IRDES), Paris, France
| | - F. Daniel
- Institut de Recherche et Documentation en Économie de la Santé (Institute for Research and Information in Health Economics – IRDES), Paris, France
| | - S. Houzard
- Institut National du Cancer (French National Cancer Institute – INCa), Boulogne Billancourt, France
| | - C. Le Bihan
- Institut National du Cancer (French National Cancer Institute – INCa), Boulogne Billancourt, France
| | - M. Coldefy
- Institut de Recherche et Documentation en Économie de la Santé (Institute for Research and Information in Health Economics – IRDES), Paris, France
| | - C. Gandré
- Institut de Recherche et Documentation en Économie de la Santé (Institute for Research and Information in Health Economics – IRDES), Paris, France
- AP-HP, Robert Debré University Hospital, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Wheat CL, Wong ES, Gray KE, Stockdale SE, Nelson KM, Reddy A. Factors Associated With Use of the Preventive Health Inventory in US Veterans. JAMA Netw Open 2024; 7:e242717. [PMID: 38497962 PMCID: PMC10949100 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.2717] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2023] [Accepted: 01/24/2024] [Indexed: 03/19/2024] Open
Abstract
Importance The COVID-19 pandemic caused significant declines in the quality of preventive and chronic disease care. The Veterans Health Administration (VHA) used the Preventive Health Inventory (PHI), a multicomponent care management intervention, to catch up on care disrupted by the pandemic. Objective To identify key factors associated with PHI use. Design, Setting, and Participants This cohort study of veterans receiving primary care used administrative data from national VHA primary care clinics for February 1, 2021, through February 1, 2022. Exposure Patient PHI receipt. Main Outcomes and Measures The main outcomes were patient, practitioner, and clinic factors associated with PHI receipt. Binomial generalized linear models with fixed effects for clinic were used to analyze factors associated with receipt of PHI. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator procedures were used for variable selection. Results A total of 4 358 038 veterans (mean [SD] age, 63.7 [16.0] years; 90% male; 76% non-Hispanic White) formed the study cohort, of whom 389 757 (9%) received the PHI. Veterans who received the PHI had higher mean Care Assessment Need (CAN) scores, which indicate the likelihood of hospitalization or death within 1 year (mean [SD], 51.9 [28.6] vs 47.2 [28.6]; standardized mean difference [SMD], -0.16). They were also more likely to live in urban areas (77% vs 64%; SMD, 0.28) and have a shorter drive distance to primary care (mean [SD], 13.2 [12.4] vs 15.7 [14.6] miles; SMD, 0.19). The mean outpatient use was higher among PHI recipients compared with non-PHI recipients (mean [SD], 18.4 [27.8] vs 15.1 [24.1] visits; SMD, -0.13). In addition, veterans with primary care practitioners with higher caseloads were more likely to receive the PHI (mean [SD], 778 [231] vs 744 [249] patients; SMD, -0.14), and they were more likely to be seen at larger clinics (mean [SD], 9670 [6876] vs 8786 [6892] patients; SMD, -0.13). Prior outpatient use and CAN score were associated with PHI receipt in the final model. Conclusions and Relevance In this cohort study of the VHA's PHI, patients with higher CAN scores and more outpatient use in the previous year were more likely to receive the PHI. This study identifies potential intervention points to improve care coordination for veterans.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chelle L. Wheat
- Center for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care, Veterans Affairs (VA) Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington
| | - Edwin S. Wong
- Center for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care, Veterans Affairs (VA) Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington
- Department of Health Systems and Population Health, University of Washington, Seattle
| | - Kristen E. Gray
- Center for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care, Veterans Affairs (VA) Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington
- Department of Health Systems and Population Health, University of Washington, Seattle
| | - Susan E. Stockdale
- VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation and Policy (CSHIIP), Los Angeles, California
- David Geffen School of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles
| | - Karin M. Nelson
- Center for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care, Veterans Affairs (VA) Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington
- Department of Health Systems and Population Health, University of Washington, Seattle
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle
| | - Ashok Reddy
- Center for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care, Veterans Affairs (VA) Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington
- Department of Health Systems and Population Health, University of Washington, Seattle
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Gong Y, Flander LB, Macrae F, Wilson C, Jenkins MA. The Association Between Screening for Colorectal Cancer and Mental and Physical Health. Cancer Control 2024; 31:10732748241285492. [PMID: 39318023 PMCID: PMC11452864 DOI: 10.1177/10732748241285492] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2023] [Revised: 07/26/2024] [Accepted: 08/22/2024] [Indexed: 09/26/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Colorectal cancer screening reduces colorectal cancer morbidity and mortality. Identifying the factors associated with screening participation is needed to overcome barriers to screening. While several of those factors have been identified, the impact of mental and physical health on screening behaviour is not well understood. METHODS This retrospective cohort study compared the self-reported mental and physical health of those who did screen for colorectal cancer and those who did not. Participants of the Australasian Colorectal Cancer Family Registry Cohort that were aged 45-75 years and had never been diagnosed with colorectal cancer were asked to complete a questionnaire detailing their colorectal cancer screening participation in the preceding 5 years, and a validated questionnaire of mental and physical health. Multivariable logistic regression was used to adjust for measured potential confounders. RESULTS Of the 1130 eligible participants, 781 had a family history of colorectal cancer (69.5%), and 819 reported colorectal cancer screening in the past 5 years (72%). After adjusting for potential confounders, there was no evidence that overall mental or physical health was associated with colorectal cancer screening. However, those reporting higher levels of general health were more likely to participate in colorectal cancer screening (OR = 1.02 (100 point scale), 95% CI 1.004, 1.037, P = .014). CONCLUSION We found limited evidence that mental and physical health were associated with colorectal cancer screening. The high proportion of participants with a family history of colorectal cancer limits the generaliseability of the findings to the general population, although we observed no differences in findings by strength of family history.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yiting Gong
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Louisa B. Flander
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Finlay Macrae
- Colorectal Medicine and Genetics, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, VIC, Australia
- Department of Medicine, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Carlene Wilson
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Mark A. Jenkins
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Centre Cancer Research, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Graversen SB, Nannsen AØ, Bjerg L, Larsen MB, Andersen B, Laurberg T. The impact of diabetes on cancer detection during the prevalence round of a national screening program for colorectal cancer. Diabet Med 2023; 40:e15043. [PMID: 36655559 DOI: 10.1111/dme.15043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2022] [Revised: 12/21/2022] [Accepted: 01/10/2023] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Abstract
AIMS Diabetes is associated with a higher risk of colorectal cancer (CRC) and inferior survival after CRC. Screening may enable the early detection of CRC. We aimed to assess the impact of diabetes on cancer detection and disease stage during the prevalence round of a national CRC screening program. METHODS We performed a register-based cohort study based on the randomized procedure for inviting Danish residents aged 50-74 years to the prevalence round of national CRC screening program in 2014-2017. By comparing the random half of the population who had been invited by 1 May 2016 with the not yet invited half, the effect of screening was assessed by the detection of CRC and disease stage among individuals with and without diabetes. Further, the impact of diabetes on the screening participation rate was calculated. RESULTS By randomisation, 504,673 individuals had been invited to the CRC screening by 1 May 2016, and 549,359 individuals had not yet been invited. The diabetes prevalence was 10% in both groups. When comparing those not yet invited to those invited, the effect of screening on the number of detected cancers per 100,000 individuals was higher in those with diabetes (from 207 to 494 cancers) than in those without diabetes (from 147 to 364 cancers), and screening resulted in overall higher proportions of stage I cancer. Among those invited to screening, the participation rate was 9.1% lower (95% CI: 8.7%-9.5%) in individuals with versus without diabetes. CONCLUSIONS Despite a lower participation rate, the effect of CRC screening was higher in individuals with diabetes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Lasse Bjerg
- Steno Diabetes Center Aarhus, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus N, Denmark
- Department of Public Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus C, Denmark
| | - Mette Bach Larsen
- Department of Public Health Programmes, University Research Clinic for Cancer Screening, Randers Regional Hospital, Randers NØ, Denmark
| | - Berit Andersen
- Department of Public Health Programmes, University Research Clinic for Cancer Screening, Randers Regional Hospital, Randers NØ, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus N, Denmark
| | - Tinne Laurberg
- Steno Diabetes Center Aarhus, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus N, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Bülow Therkildsen S, Larsen PT, Njor S. Subsequent participation in organized FIT based screening following screen-derived colonoscopy - A Danish nationwide cohort study. Prev Med Rep 2023; 32:102125. [PMID: 36816764 PMCID: PMC9929440 DOI: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2023.102125] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2022] [Revised: 01/24/2023] [Accepted: 01/31/2023] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction In the Danish National Colorectal Cancer (CRC) screening program, participants with screen-detected low-risk adenomas are invited to a new faecal immunochemical test (FIT) screening after two years. However, participation rate in next FIT screening is unknown. We aimed to investigate this subsequent participation rate within the Danish CRC screening program. Methods This nationwide register-based study included participants aged 50-72 years registered with FIT screening in the Danish CRC screening program between January 1, 2016, and June 30, 2017. Participants were included if their index FIT was negative or if it was positive and the subsequent colonoscopy detected low-risk adenomas. Invitees were categorized as subsequent participants if they returned a FIT within 135 days following the invitation to screening. We estimated the relative risk for participation depending on screening outcome, age, and sex. Result 415,107 with a negative result and 5,550 with low-risk adenomas were included. 86.0% (85.9;86.1) of the invitees with a negative result participated in the subsequent screening, while 71.8% (70.6;73.0) of the invitees with low-risk adenomas participated subsequently. The risk of participation in the subsequent screening was significantly lower among all age groups of men and women with low-risk adenomas compared to similar groups with negative results. Conclusion Invitees with low-risk adenomas detected at their initial colonoscopy are less likely to participate in the subsequent screening than invitees with negative results. This association was found in all age groups and for both sexes. Further studies are necessary to assess whether non-attendance is more pronounced in specific subgroups.
Collapse
Key Words
- Adenomas
- Adherence
- CI, Confidence Interval
- CRC, Colorectal cancer
- CRN, Civil register number
- Colonoscopy
- Colorectal cancer screening
- Colorectal neoplasm
- DCCG, The Danish Colorectal Cancer register
- DCCSD, Database for Colorectal cancer screening
- DCR, The Danish Cancer Registry
- DNPR, The National Patient Register
- FAP, Familial adenomatous polyposis
- FIT, Fecal Immunochemical Test
- IBD, Inflammatory bowel database
- ICD, International Classification of Diseases
- Mass screening
- Participation
- RR, Relative risk
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Signe Bülow Therkildsen
- University Research Clinic for Cancer Screening, Department of Public Health Programmes, Randers Regional Hospital, Skovlyvej 15, 8930 Randers NØ, Denmark,Corresponding authors.
| | - Pernille Thordal Larsen
- University Research Clinic for Cancer Screening, Department of Public Health Programmes, Randers Regional Hospital, Skovlyvej 15, 8930 Randers NØ, Denmark,Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Palle Juul-Jensen Boulevard 82, 8200 Aarhus N, Denmark,Corresponding authors.
| | - Sisse Njor
- University Research Clinic for Cancer Screening, Department of Public Health Programmes, Randers Regional Hospital, Skovlyvej 15, 8930 Randers NØ, Denmark,Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Palle Juul-Jensen Boulevard 82, 8200 Aarhus N, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Jørgensen MD, Mikkelsen EM, Erichsen R, Thomsen MK. Mental illness and participation in colorectal cancer screening: a scoping review. Scand J Gastroenterol 2022; 57:1216-1226. [PMID: 35639472 DOI: 10.1080/00365521.2022.2073185] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Compared with the background population, persons with mental illness have increased colorectal cancer (CRC) mortality. Screening has the potential to alleviate the increased cancer mortality due to mental illness, but the extent to which persons with mental illness participate in CRC screening programs is uncertain. This scoping review aims to summarize the literature on CRC screening participation among persons with mental illness. MATERIALS AND METHODS We searched four databases (PubMed, PsychInfo, Embase, and the Cochrane Library) to identify published literature on mental illness and participation in CRC screening programs. We included full-text papers available in English, published before February 2021, and excluded papers on dementia, intellectual disabilities, and developmental disabilities. RESULTS In total, we included 17 studies and categorized the findings according to severity of mental illness. Across varying study designs, the studies found that persons with severe mental illness, e.g. schizophrenia, participate less in CRC screening compared with the background population. The results were ambiguous for common mental illness, such as depression and anxiety. In general, studies were small or lacked comparison groups and the estimates were imprecise. CONCLUSION This is the first scoping review to evaluate participation in CRC screening programs among persons with mental illness. Overall, the existing literature lacks high quality evidence from large population-based studies and comparison groups based on organized screening programs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marie D Jørgensen
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Aarhus University and Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus N, Denmark
| | - Ellen M Mikkelsen
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Aarhus University and Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus N, Denmark
| | - Rune Erichsen
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Aarhus University and Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus N, Denmark.,Department of Surgery, Randers Regional Hospital, Randers NØ, Denmark
| | - Mette K Thomsen
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Aarhus University and Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus N, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Effect of Chronic Comorbidities on Follow-up Colonoscopy After Positive Colorectal Cancer Screening Results: A Population-Based Cohort Study. Am J Gastroenterol 2022; 117:1137-1145. [PMID: 35333781 DOI: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000001742] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2021] [Accepted: 03/18/2022] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Fecal occult blood tests (FOBTs) are colorectal cancer screening tests used to identify individuals requiring further investigation with colonoscopy. Delayed colonoscopy after positive FOBT (FOBT+) is associated with poorer cancer outcomes. We assessed the effect of comorbidity on colonoscopy receipt within 12 months after FOBT+. METHODS Population-based healthcare databases from Ontario, Canada, were linked to assemble a cohort of 50-74-year-old individuals with FOBT+ results between 2008 and 2017. The associations between comorbidities and colonoscopy receipt within 12 months after FOBT+ were examined using multivariable cause-specific hazard regression models. RESULTS Of 168,701 individuals with FOBT+, 80.5% received colonoscopy within 12 months. In multivariable models, renal failure (hazard ratio [HR] 0.71, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.62-0.82), heart failure (HR 0.77, CI 0.75-0.80), and serious mental illness (HR 0.88, CI 0.85-0.92) were associated with the lowest colonoscopy rates, compared with not having each condition. The number of medical conditions was inversely associated with colonoscopy uptake (≥4 vs 0: HR 0.64, CI 0.58-0.69; 3 vs 0: HR 0.75, CI 0.72-0.78; and 2 vs 0: HR 0.87, CI 0.85-0.89). Having both medical and mental health conditions was associated with a lower colonoscopy uptake relative to no comorbidity (HR 0.88, CI 0.87-0.90). DISCUSSION Persons with medical and mental health conditions had lower colonoscopy rates after FOBT+ than those without these conditions. Better strategies are needed to optimize colorectal cancer screening and follow-up in individuals with comorbidities.
Collapse
|
8
|
Bhatia D, Sutradhar R, Austin PC, Giannakeas V, Jaakkimainen L, Paszat LF, Lipscombe LL. Periodic screening for breast and cervical cancer in women with diabetes: a population-based cohort study. Cancer Causes Control 2021; 33:249-259. [PMID: 34800194 DOI: 10.1007/s10552-021-01517-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2021] [Accepted: 11/01/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Diabetes is associated with poorer cancer outcomes. Screening for breast and cervical cancer is recommended by clinical guidelines; however, utilization of these tests in people with diabetes has been unclear due to methodological limitations in the evidence base. We used administrative data to determine the association between diabetes and the rates of becoming up-to-date with periodic breast and cervical cancer screening over a 20-year period. METHODS Healthcare databases from Ontario, Canada, were linked to assemble two population-based cohorts of 50-70 and 21-70 year-olds between 1994 and 2011, eligible for breast and cervical cancer screening, respectively. Using age as the time scale, multivariable recurrent events models were implemented to examine the association between the presence of diabetes and the rates of becoming up-to-date with the recommended cancer screenings. RESULTS In each of the breast and cervical cancer screening cohorts, there were, respectively, 1,516,302 (16% had diabetes at baseline) and 4,751,220 (9.5% had diabetes at baseline) screen-eligible women. In multivariable models, prevalent diabetes (duration ≥ 2 years) was associated with lower rates of becoming up-to-date with cervical (hazard ratio, HR 0.85, 95% confidence interval, CI 0.84-0.85) and breast (HR 0.94, CI 0.93-0.94) cancer screening, compared to no diabetes. CONCLUSIONS Having diabetes is associated with decreased rates of becoming up-to-date with two recommended periodic cancer screenings, with a bigger reduction in the rates of becoming up-to-date with cervical cancer screening. Greater attention to cervical cancer preventive services is needed in women with diabetes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dominika Bhatia
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, 155 College Street, Toronto, ON, M5T 3M7, Canada.
| | - Rinku Sutradhar
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, 155 College Street, Toronto, ON, M5T 3M7, Canada.,ICES, 2075 Bayview Avenue, Toronto, ON, M4N 3M5, Canada
| | - Peter C Austin
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, 155 College Street, Toronto, ON, M5T 3M7, Canada.,ICES, 2075 Bayview Avenue, Toronto, ON, M4N 3M5, Canada.,Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Sunnybrook Research Institute, 2075 Bayview Avenue, Toronto, ON, M4N 3M5, Canada
| | - Vasily Giannakeas
- ICES, 2075 Bayview Avenue, Toronto, ON, M4N 3M5, Canada.,Women's College Hospital, Women's College Research Institute, 76 Grenville Street, Toronto, ON, M5S 1B2, Canada
| | - Liisa Jaakkimainen
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, 155 College Street, Toronto, ON, M5T 3M7, Canada.,ICES, 2075 Bayview Avenue, Toronto, ON, M4N 3M5, Canada.,Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Sunnybrook Research Institute, 2075 Bayview Avenue, Toronto, ON, M4N 3M5, Canada.,Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, 500 University Avenue, Toronto, ON, M5G 1V7, Canada
| | - Lawrence F Paszat
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, 155 College Street, Toronto, ON, M5T 3M7, Canada.,ICES, 2075 Bayview Avenue, Toronto, ON, M4N 3M5, Canada.,Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Sunnybrook Research Institute, 2075 Bayview Avenue, Toronto, ON, M4N 3M5, Canada
| | - Lorraine L Lipscombe
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, 155 College Street, Toronto, ON, M5T 3M7, Canada.,ICES, 2075 Bayview Avenue, Toronto, ON, M4N 3M5, Canada.,Women's College Hospital, Women's College Research Institute, 76 Grenville Street, Toronto, ON, M5S 1B2, Canada.,Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, 1 King's College Circle, Toronto, ONs, M5S 1A8, Canada
| |
Collapse
|