Testing REACH draft technical guidance notes for conducting chemical safety assessments—The experience of a downstream user of a preparation

A case study and a computational simulation of the European Union draft technical guidance documents for chemical safety assessment of mixtures: limitations and a tentative alternative

Two different methods, Key Critical Component (KCC) and Composite Reciprocal (CR), are used to derive Predicted No Effect Concentration (PNECs) and Derived No Effect Level (DNELs) that are employed in mixture risk assessment. A case study was conducted on coating products and a computational simulation of the KCC and CR methods. The KCC method considers only one key critical component as the whole mixture of equal danger, whereas the CR method indirectly considers the contribution of each component to mixture toxicity. Computational simulation is the first approach that adopts a theoretical perspective in discussing the causes of different outcomes between models and how the two methods should be applied for regulatory purposes in terms of concept, implementation, and performance. The deviation between the two models was highly dependent on the number of mixture components having similarly weighted DNELs (or PNECs). Therefore, if risk assessment using the KCC or CR method needs to be achieved, then the number of mixture components with similarly weighted DNELs (or PNECs) should be checked first. In this study, as a tentative alternative to the existing KCC and CR methods, a tiered approach combining Enhanced KCC (e-KCC) and CR methods was proposed and discussed.

Ecotoxicity of paint mixtures: comparison between measured and calculated toxicity

The aims of the current study were to test the validity of the concentration addition (CA) and independent action (IA) calculation methods for mixture toxicity as well as the REACH guidelines for mixture exposure scenarios for paint products. Based on ecotoxicity tests of nine anticorrosive paint mixtures and the nine substances that contributed to classification of the mixtures as hazardous for the aquatic environment, neither CA nor IA was found to be appropriate calculation methods, although CA calculations were conservative for half of the mixtures tested. The REACH mixture approach, based on "lead" substances, resulted in conservative predictions for three out of five mixtures and the "lead" substance corresponded to the substance contributing the most in the CA mixture calculations for four out of six mixtures. The use of paints as a matrix for toxicity testing required adaptation of test procedures, development of sample handling and chemical analysis methods.