Acute inhalation toxicity of carbon monoxide and hydrogen cyanide revisited: Comparison of models to disentangle the concentration × time conundrum of lethality and incapacitation

Exposure levels for carbon monoxide in nuclear submarine atmosphere

This work proposes exposure limits for carbon monoxide in the nuclear submarine environment. Linear and non-linear forms of the Coburn-Foster-Kane equation were used to evaluate carbon monoxide exposure for an environment with low oxygen content, different exposure times and crew physical activity levels. We evaluated the 90-day Continuous Exposure Guidance Level, 24-h and 1-h Emergency Exposure Guidance Levels and 10-day and 24-h Submarine Escape Action Levels. The results showed that the concentration of carbon monoxide in the environment must not exceed 9 ppm for the 90-day Continuous Exposure Guidance Level, 35 ppm for the 24-h Emergency Exposure Guidance Level, 90 ppm 1-h Emergency Exposure Guidance Level, 60 ppm for the 10-day Submarine Escape Action Level and 80 ppm for the 24-h Submarine Escape Action Level. Comparing these values with those established by the National Research Council for the United States Navy, the limits proposed by this work are verified to be lower, which may indicate a risk to the health of the crew. They also show the impact of the crew's level of physical activity on the formation of carboxyhemoglobin.

Estimation of time to compromised tenability in fires: is it time to change paradigms?

The ISO standard 13571 estimates the time to the compromised tenability of people in enclosed fires. This is understood as the time which must be available for the structural design to pass an evacuation, or an escape paradigm for the evacuation of burning buildings. As with all emergency response planning values, such once-in-a-lifetime events cannot readily be validated side-by-side. Consequently, risk assessors must refer to animal-based reference data fitting the scenario of concern closely. The analysis detailed in this paper used the concentration × time (Cxt)-matrix of point of departures (PODs) from rats acutely exposed to carbon monoxide (CO), which is amongst the most abundant toxic fire gases. The objective of the analysis was to clarify whether the time- and effect-adjusted nonlethal threshold concentration LCt₀₁ × 1/3 from acute rat inhalation studies is suited to model thresholds characterizing any 'impairment of escape' in humans. Modeled outcomes are compared with published reference data from human volunteers exposed at the similar C × t's of CO at 800 ppm × 1-h and 100 ppm × 8-h. These exposure durations match the maximum escape duration of 1-h considered in the ISO standard 13571 and standards enforcing occupational exposure limits of 8-h duration. The reference PODs indicative of 'impairment of escape' in healthy adults relied on C × t's below those eliciting any loss of motor function or psychoneurological functions. The comparison of the LCt₀₁ × 1/3 based modeled outcomes from rats match favorably with the effect-based PODs from humans. Consistent with published evidence from humans, carboxyhemoglobin (COHb) saturation-a biomarker of exposure rather than of effect-failed to reliably predict effect-based outcomes. Unlike the LCt₀₁ × 1/3 threshold approach, the COHb-based median approach used by ISO TS 13571 is inconsistent with human evidence and both over- and under-estimates the CO-related potency for causing incapacitation at non-toxic and critically-toxic C × 's, respectively. In summary, it seems timely that the ISO TS 13571 standard pays attention to scientific progress in relevant toxicity information and refinements to scientific methods shown to adequately predict human risks.

User-oriented independent analysis of the toxic load model's ability to predict the effects of time-varying toxic inhalation exposures

Toxic industrial chemicals and chemical warfare agents present an acute inhalation hazard to exposed populations. The hazardous materials consequence assessment modeling community requires toxicity models to estimate these hazards. One popular phenomenological toxicity model is the toxic load model. Although this model is only well-defined for constant-concentration exposures, several generalizations have been proposed for the case of time-varying exposures. None of them, however, were validated by experimental evidence at the time they were proposed. Accordingly, the Defense Threat Reduction Agency (DTRA) sponsored experiments to explore the effects of time-varying inhalation exposures of hydrogen cyanide (HCN) and carbon monoxide (CO) gas on rats. The experiments were designed and executed by the U.S. Army's Edgewood Chemical and Biological Center (ECBC) and the Naval Medical Research Unit Dayton (NAMRU-D) between 2012 and 2015. We conducted an independent analysis of the toxic load model's ability to predict the ECBC/NAMRU-D experimental data using an analytical methodology oriented toward hazard prediction model users. We found that although some of the proposed extensions of the toxic load model perform better than others, all of them have difficulty reproducing the experimental data. The toxic load model also has difficulty reproducing even the constant-concentration data for HCN exposures under 10 min.

Risk assessment in combustion toxicology: Should carbon dioxide be recognized as a modifier of toxicity or separate toxicological entity?

To characterize the accumulated hazards associated with the inhalation of gases typical of combustion products, a time-integrated value known as the fractional effective dose (FED) is used. This FED is maintained by the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) and made publicly available as the Standard ISO 13571. The current FED calculation related to asphyxiant gases is based on non-human primate data to estimate the 50% probability of humans to be incapacitated or not being able to execute any escape paradigm from fires. The objective of this paper was to compare two to calculate FEDs of the most common mixture of asphyxiant fire gases CO, HCN, and CO₂. The first was based on the current ISO 13571 (draft) standard, the alternative second method applied the conceptual principles established for the derivation of Acute Emergency Response Planning Guideline values. The alternative approach applied one third of the non-lethal threshold concentration (LC₀₁) as the most suitable and robust Point of Departure (POD) to estimate the threshold characterizing 'impairment of escape' in the absence of post-exposure mortality. The hyperventilation correction factor for CO₂ of ISO 13571 was replaced by a separate term that accounts for the inherent acute toxicity of CO₂. This analysis supports the conclusion that the current ISO 13571 standard misjudges the impact of the acute toxicity elicited by concentrations of CO₂ exceeding ≈6%. While underestimating the hazards attributable to CO₂, the hyperventilation adjustment factor suggested by this standard is biased to markedly overestimate the hazards assigned to CO and HCN in fire effluents.