Development of an inhalation reference concentration for diethanolamine

Differences in the anatomy and physiology of the human and rat respiratory tracts and impact on toxicological assessments

Inhalation is a critical route through which substances can exert adverse effects in humans; therefore, it is important to characterize the potential effects that inhaled substances may have on the human respiratory tract by using fit for purpose, reliable, and human relevant testing tools. In regulatory toxicology testing, rats have primarily been used to assess the effects of inhaled substances as they-being mammals-share similarities in structure and function of the respiratory tract with humans. However, questions about inter-species differences impacting the predictability of human effects have surfaced. Disparities in macroscopic anatomy, microscopic anatomy, or physiology, such as breathing mode (e.g., nose-only versus oronasal breathing), airway structure (e.g., complexity of the nasal turbinates), cell types and location within the respiratory tract, and local metabolism may impact inhalation toxicity testing results. This review shows that these key differences describe uncertainty in the use of rat data to predict human effects and supports an opportunity to harness modern toxicology tools and a detailed understanding of the human respiratory tract to develop testing approaches grounded in human biology. Ultimately, as the regulatory purpose is protecting human health, there is a need for testing approaches based on human biology and mechanisms of toxicity.

A Weight-of-the-Evidence Approach for Evaluating, in Lieu of Animal Studies, the Potential of a Novel Polysaccharide Polymer to Produce Lung Overload

The United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is concerned about the respiratory effects caused by respirable particles of water-insoluble high molecular weight polymers. The EPA has proposed a tiered approach to evaluate polymer lung overload, a kinetic event. Kinetic polymer lung overload in itself is not necessarily adverse, however, inhalation of respirable particulate matter can have adverse effects (i.e., inflammation, fibrosis, etc.). If Tier I testing demonstrates that particles may reach the distal lung (i.e., a non-negligible amount of respirable particles/droplets ≤10 μm in diameter and lack of biosolubility), then animal inhalation testing in Tiers II-IV would be requested. In silico, in chemico, and in vitro alternatives should be considered versus in vivo testing for animal welfare purposes. An in chemico measure of biosolubility was used to demonstrate that a novel α-1,3-glucan polysaccharide, made by enzymatic polymerization of glucose from sucrose, is biosoluble and fits a simple exponential decay model with a half-life on the order of 66 days. The multiple-path particle dosimetry (MPPD) in silico model was used to predict lung burden for the novel α-1,3-glucan polysaccharide. MPPD was validated with measurements in rats exposed to a toner particulate and showed good agreement with lung burden measurements. A simulated 24 month rat exposure yielded 10-20 times less lung burden for the polysaccharide compared to the toner at equivalent exposure concentrations. The MPPD model was refined to include biosolubility data for the polysaccharide polymer. Data for amorphous silica were used to validate the clearance model, and the model incorporating dissolution predicted the amorphous silica lung burden within 20% of measured values. Human equivalent concentrations (HECs) were calculated for each toner rat exposure concentration. HECs were also determined for the polysaccharide at exposure concentrations yielding the same predicted internal doses as the toner. The in vitro, in chemico and in silico studies described here for the novel polysaccharide provide a useful weight of evidence approach in the absence of animal studies for the evaluation of polymer substances where polymer lung overload may be a concern.