1
|
Purroy XS, Sierra BR, Becerra Reymundo L, Serradet VM, Camacho AM, Briceno NA, Artiles K, Lad P, Phan N, Rodriguez Leiva A, Appolon JN, Mikhail A, Ruiz AM, Rodriguez C, Vega D, Moyano G, Intrator G, Yasinski K, Mclean K, Gonzalez Giliberti N, Ramirez Ramirez E, Adolpho de Melo V, Alsina AS, Andino MY, Becker BA, Castellanos H, Castillo NA, Fernandez BS, Estinvil JR, Gonzalez AA, Hernandez EM, Ho A, Islam SF, Liubenco A, Mejia L, Meesala SN, Morales-Ramirez W, Morlote N, Ramos-Homs K, Rodriguez JA, Torres LM, Waikel P, Mayoral J. Genome Sequence of Three Siphoviruses in the EE, GA and EA5 Actinobacteriophage Clusters: Biscayne, Bush and GreenIvy. MICROPUBLICATION BIOLOGY 2025; 2025:10.17912/micropub.biology.001397. [PMID: 39839715 PMCID: PMC11749239 DOI: 10.17912/micropub.biology.001397] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2024] [Revised: 12/19/2024] [Accepted: 01/02/2025] [Indexed: 01/23/2025]
Abstract
Bacteriophages Biscayne, Bush and GreenIvy were isolated from soil samples in Miami, FL using Microbacterium foliorum NRRL B-24224 as host. Transmission electron microscopy shows siphoviral morphologies for all three phages. Based on gene content similarity to other actinobacteriophages, they are assigned to the EE, GA and EA5 clusters, respectively.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xavier S Purroy
- Biological Sciences, Florida International University, Miami, FL. USA
| | - Betty R Sierra
- Biological Sciences, Florida International University, Miami, FL. USA
| | | | | | | | - Nicole A Briceno
- Biological Sciences, Florida International University, Miami, FL. USA
| | - Katherine Artiles
- Biological Sciences, Florida International University, Miami, FL. USA
| | - Pooja Lad
- Biological Sciences, Florida International University, Miami, FL. USA
| | - Nhan Phan
- Biological Sciences, Florida International University, Miami, FL. USA
| | | | - Jazlyn N Appolon
- Biological Sciences, Florida International University, Miami, FL. USA
| | - Akram Mikhail
- Biological Sciences, Florida International University, Miami, FL. USA
| | - Arianna M Ruiz
- Biological Sciences, Florida International University, Miami, FL. USA
| | - Carlos Rodriguez
- Biological Sciences, Florida International University, Miami, FL. USA
| | - David Vega
- Biological Sciences, Florida International University, Miami, FL. USA
| | - Gabriela Moyano
- Biological Sciences, Florida International University, Miami, FL. USA
| | - Grace Intrator
- Biological Sciences, Florida International University, Miami, FL. USA
| | - Kiryl Yasinski
- Biological Sciences, Florida International University, Miami, FL. USA
| | - Kristen Mclean
- Biological Sciences, Florida International University, Miami, FL. USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Maria Y Andino
- Biological Sciences, Florida International University, Miami, FL. USA
| | - Brian A Becker
- Biological Sciences, Florida International University, Miami, FL. USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Amanda A Gonzalez
- Biological Sciences, Florida International University, Miami, FL. USA
| | - Emily M Hernandez
- Biological Sciences, Florida International University, Miami, FL. USA
| | - Ayden Ho
- Biological Sciences, Florida International University, Miami, FL. USA
| | - Sheikh F Islam
- Biological Sciences, Florida International University, Miami, FL. USA
| | - Anna Liubenco
- Biological Sciences, Florida International University, Miami, FL. USA
| | - Lance Mejia
- Biological Sciences, Florida International University, Miami, FL. USA
| | - Sandra N Meesala
- Biological Sciences, Florida International University, Miami, FL. USA
| | | | - Nathalie Morlote
- Biological Sciences, Florida International University, Miami, FL. USA
| | - Kevin Ramos-Homs
- Biological Sciences, Florida International University, Miami, FL. USA
| | - Jorge A Rodriguez
- Biological Sciences, Florida International University, Miami, FL. USA
| | - Leydis M Torres
- Biological Sciences, Florida International University, Miami, FL. USA
| | - Patricia Waikel
- Biological Sciences, Florida International University, Miami, FL. USA
| | - Jaime Mayoral
- Biological Sciences, Florida International University, Miami, FL. USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Guerrero JA, Maldonado N, Mbajiofor EO, Ramirez L, Valencia MJ, Healy CD, Garza AA, Mizell SA, Jackson BN, Vargas Ayala M. Characterization and genome sequence of Microbacterium foliorum phage Morrigan, of cluster EA6 with siphovirus morphology. Microbiol Resour Announc 2023; 12:e0071923. [PMID: 37975671 PMCID: PMC10720499 DOI: 10.1128/mra.00719-23] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2023] [Accepted: 10/12/2023] [Indexed: 11/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Bacteriophage Morrigan, which was isolated from soil using Microbacterium foliorum NRRL B-24224, is lytic with siphovirus morphology. Morrigan's 40,509-bp genome has a GC content of 62.8% and 66 putative protein-coding genes, of which 31 could be assigned putative functions. Based on gene content similarity to actinobacteriophages, Morrigan is assigned to subcluster EA6.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer A. Guerrero
- Department of Integrative Biology, University of Texas at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas, USA
| | - Nery Maldonado
- Department of Integrative Biology, University of Texas at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas, USA
| | - Emmanuella O. Mbajiofor
- Department of Integrative Biology, University of Texas at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas, USA
| | - Lisette Ramirez
- Department of Integrative Biology, University of Texas at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas, USA
| | - Mary Jo Valencia
- Department of Integrative Biology, University of Texas at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas, USA
| | - Creehan D. Healy
- Department of Integrative Biology, University of Texas at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas, USA
| | - Alejandro A. Garza
- Department of Integrative Biology, University of Texas at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas, USA
| | - Samantha A. Mizell
- Department of Integrative Biology, University of Texas at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas, USA
| | - Brianna N. Jackson
- Department of Integrative Biology, University of Texas at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas, USA
| | - Mayra Vargas Ayala
- Department of Integrative Biology, University of Texas at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Characterization of Phages YuuY, KaiHaiDragon, and OneinaGillian Isolated from Microbacterium foliorum. Int J Mol Sci 2022; 23:ijms23126609. [PMID: 35743053 PMCID: PMC9224216 DOI: 10.3390/ijms23126609] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2022] [Revised: 06/10/2022] [Accepted: 06/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Microbacterium foliorum is a Gram-positive bacteria found in organic matter. Three lytic bacteriophages, KaiHaiDragon, OneinaGillian, and YuuY, were isolated from M. foliorum strain NRRL B-24224. Phage YuuY in particular expresses a broad host range as it possesses the ability to infect closely related bacterial species Microbacterium aerolatum at a high plating efficiency. Characterization tests were performed on all three Microbacterium phage to assess morphology, genomic characteristics, pH and thermal stabilities, life cycle, and the type of receptor used for infection. All three phages showed similar pH stability, ranging from pH 5-11, except for KaiHaiDragon, which had a reduced infection effectiveness at a pH of 11. YuuY possessed a significantly higher temperature tolerance compared to the other Microbacterium phages as some phage particles remained viable after incubation temperatures of up to 80 °C. Based on the one-step growth curve assay, all three Microbacterium phages possessed a relatively short latent period of 90 min and an approximately two-fold burst size factor. Moreover, all three phages utilize a carbohydrate receptor to initiate infection. Based on bioinformatics analysis, YuuY, KaiHaiDragon and OneinaGillian were assigned to clusters EA10, EC, and EG, respectively.
Collapse
|
4
|
Fu X, Ou Z, Zhang M, Meng Y, Li Y, Wen J, Hu Q, Zhang X, Norbäck D, Deng Y, Zhao Z, Sun Y. Indoor bacterial, fungal and viral species and functional genes in urban and rural schools in Shanxi Province, China-association with asthma, rhinitis and rhinoconjunctivitis in high school students. MICROBIOME 2021; 9:138. [PMID: 34118964 PMCID: PMC8199840 DOI: 10.1186/s40168-021-01091-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2020] [Accepted: 05/09/2021] [Indexed: 05/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Studies in developed countries have reported that the prevalence of asthma and rhinitis is higher in urban areas than in rural areas, and this phenomenon is associated with urbanization and changing indoor microbiome exposure. Developing countries such as China have experienced rapid urbanization in past years, but no study has investigated microbiome exposure and urban-rural health effects in these countries. METHODS Nine high schools from urban and rural areas were randomly selected in Shanxi Province, China, and classroom vacuum dust was collected for shotgun metagenomic sequencing. A self-administered questionnaire was collected from 1332 students for personal information and health data. Three-level logistic regression was performed between microbial richness/abundance/functional pathways and the occurrence of asthma and rhinitis symptoms. RESULTS Consistent with developed countries, the prevalence of wheeze and rhinitis was higher in urban areas than in rural areas (p < 0.05). Metagenomic profiling revealed 8302 bacterial, 395 archaeal, 744 fungal, 524 protist and 1103 viral species in classroom dust. Actinobacteria (mean relative abundance 49.7%), Gammaproteobacteria (18.4%) and Alphaproteobacteria (10.0%) were the most abundant bacterial classes. The overall microbiome composition was significantly different between urban and rural schools (p = 0.001, Adonis). Species from Betaproteobactera, Gammaproteobacteria and Bacilli were enriched in urban schools, and species from Actinobacteria and Cyanobacteria were enriched in rural schools. Potential pathogens were present in higher abundance in urban schools than in rural schools (p < 0.05). Pseudoalteromonas, Neospora caninum and Microbacterium foliorum were positively associated with the occurrence of wheeze, rhinitis and rhinoconjunctivitis, and Brachybacterium was protectively (negatively) associated with rhinitis (p < 0.01). The abundance of human endocrine and metabolic disease pathways was positively associated with rhinitis (p = 0.008), and butyrate and propionate metabolic genes and pathways were significantly enriched in rural schools (p < 0.005), in line with previous findings that these short-chain fatty acids protect against inflammatory diseases in the human gut. CONCLUSIONS We conducted the first indoor microbiome survey in urban/rural environments with shotgun metagenomics, and the results revealed high-resolution microbial taxonomic and functional profiling and potential health effects. Video abstract.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xi Fu
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Protein Function and Regulation in Agricultural Organisms, College of Life Sciences, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510642, People's Republic of China
- School of Public Health, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Zheyuan Ou
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Protein Function and Regulation in Agricultural Organisms, College of Life Sciences, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510642, People's Republic of China
- Key Laboratory of Zoonosis of Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510642, People's Republic of China
- Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510642, People's Republic of China
| | - Mei Zhang
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Protein Function and Regulation in Agricultural Organisms, College of Life Sciences, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510642, People's Republic of China
- Key Laboratory of Zoonosis of Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510642, People's Republic of China
- Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510642, People's Republic of China
| | - Yi Meng
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Protein Function and Regulation in Agricultural Organisms, College of Life Sciences, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510642, People's Republic of China
- Key Laboratory of Zoonosis of Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510642, People's Republic of China
- Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510642, People's Republic of China
| | - Yanling Li
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Protein Function and Regulation in Agricultural Organisms, College of Life Sciences, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510642, People's Republic of China
- Key Laboratory of Zoonosis of Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510642, People's Republic of China
- Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510642, People's Republic of China
| | - Jikai Wen
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Protein Function and Regulation in Agricultural Organisms, College of Life Sciences, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510642, People's Republic of China
- Key Laboratory of Zoonosis of Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510642, People's Republic of China
- Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510642, People's Republic of China
| | - Qiansheng Hu
- School of Public Health, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Xin Zhang
- Institute of Environmental Science, Shanxi University, Taiyuan, People's Republic of China
| | - Dan Norbäck
- Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Department of Medical Science, University Hospital, Uppsala University, 75237, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Yiqun Deng
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Protein Function and Regulation in Agricultural Organisms, College of Life Sciences, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510642, People's Republic of China.
- Key Laboratory of Zoonosis of Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510642, People's Republic of China.
- Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510642, People's Republic of China.
| | - Zhuohui Zhao
- Department of Environmental Health, School of Public Health, Fudan University, Key Laboratory of Public Health Safety of the Ministry of Education, NHC Key Laboratory of Health Technology Assessment (Fudan University), Shanghai Typhoon Institute/CMA, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Meteorology and Health, Shanghai, 200030, China.
| | - Yu Sun
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Protein Function and Regulation in Agricultural Organisms, College of Life Sciences, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510642, People's Republic of China.
- Key Laboratory of Zoonosis of Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510642, People's Republic of China.
- Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510642, People's Republic of China.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Koutsoumanis K, Allende A, Alvarez-Ordóñez A, Bolton D, Bover-Cid S, Chemaly M, Davies R, De Cesare A, Hilbert F, Lindqvist R, Nauta M, Peixe L, Ru G, Simmons M, Skandamis P, Suffredini E, Cocconcelli PS, Fernández Escámez PS, Maradona MP, Querol A, Suarez JE, Sundh I, Vlak J, Barizzone F, Correia S, Herman L. Update of the list of QPS-recommended biological agents intentionally added to food or feed as notified to EFSA 10: Suitability of taxonomic units notified to EFSA until March 2019. EFSA J 2019; 17:e05753. [PMID: 32626372 PMCID: PMC7009089 DOI: 10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5753] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Abstract
The qualified presumption of safety (QPS) procedure was developed to provide a harmonised generic pre-evaluation to support safety risk assessments of biological agents performed by EFSA's Scientific Panels. The taxonomic identity, body of knowledge, safety concerns and antimicrobial resistance were assessed. Safety concerns identified for a taxonomic unit (TU) are, where possible and reasonable in number, reflected by 'qualifications' which should be assessed at the strain level by the EFSA's Scientific Panels. During the current assessment, no new information was found that would change the previously recommended QPS TUs and their qualifications. The list of microorganisms notified to EFSA from applications for market authorisation was updated with 47 biological agents, received between October 2018 and March 2019. Of these, 19 already had QPS status, 20 were excluded from the QPS exercise by the previous QPS mandate (11 filamentous fungi) or from further evaluations within the current mandate (9 notifications of Escherichia coli). Sphingomonas elodea, Gluconobacter frateurii, Corynebacterium ammoniagenes, Corynebacterium casei, Burkholderia ubonensis, Phaeodactylum tricornutum, Microbacterium foliorum and Euglena gracilis were evaluated for the first time. Sphingomonas elodea cannot be assessed for a possible QPS recommendation because it is not a valid species. Corynebacterium ammoniagenes and Euglena gracilis can be recommended for the QPS list with the qualification 'for production purposes only'. The following TUs cannot be recommended for the QPS list: Burkholderia ubonensis, due to its potential and confirmed ability to generate biologically active compounds and limited of body of knowledge; Corynebacterium casei, Gluconobacter frateurii and Microbacterium foliorum, due to lack of body of knowledge; Phaeodactylum tricornutum, based on the lack of a safe history of use in the food chain and limited knowledge on its potential production of bioactive compounds with possible toxic effects.
Collapse
|