Bioavailability of protein therapeutics in rats following inhalation exposure: Relevance to occupational exposure limit calculations

In vivo intranasal delivery of coagulation factor IX: a proof-of-concept study

BACKGROUND

Hemophilia B (HB) is a bleeding disorder characterized by coagulation factor (F) IX (FIX) deficiency. The current standard-of-care for severe HB is prophylaxis with long-term repetitive intravenous (i.v.) infusions of recombinant FIX (rFIX) with standard half-life or extended half-life. Unmet needs remain regarding the development of non-invasive administration routes for coagulation factors. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of intranasal delivery (IND) of rFIX and rFIX fused to Fc fragment (rFIX-Fc) in mice.

METHODS

Drops of rFIX and rFIX-Fc were deposited in the nostrils of wild-type, FcRn knock-out, FcRn humanized, and FIX knock-out mice. rFIX mucosal uptake was evaluated by measuring plasma FIX antigen and FIX activity (FIX:C) levels, and by performing histologic analysis of the nasal mucosa following IND.

RESULTS

After IND, both rFIX and rFIX-Fc were equally delivered to the blood compartment, irrespective of the mouse strain studied, mostly through a passive mechanism of transportation across the mucosal barrier, independent of FcRn receptor. Both plasma FIX antigen and FIX:C activity levels increased following IND in FIX knock-out mice.

CONCLUSION

This proof-of-concept study describes evidence supporting the nasal route as an alternative to FIX i.v. infusion for the treatment of HB.

Incorporating Bioaccessibility into Inhalation Exposure Assessment of Emamectin Benzoate from Field Spraying

The inhalation exposure of pesticide applicators and residents who live close to pesticide-treated fields is a worldwide concern in public health. Quantitative assessment of exposure to pesticide inhalation health risk highlights the need to accurately assess the bioaccessibility rather than the total content in ambient air. Herein, we developed an in vitro method to estimate the inhalation bioaccessibility of emamectin benzoate and validated its applicability using a rat plasma pharmacokinetic bioassay. Emamectin benzoate was extracted using the Gamble solution, with an optimized solid-to-liquid ratio (1/250), extraction time (24 h), and agitation (200 rpm), which obtained in vitro inhalation bioaccessibility consistent with its inhalation bioavailability in vivo (32.33%). The margin of exposure (MOE) was used to assess inhalation exposure risk. The inhalation unit exposures to emamectin benzoate of applicators and residents were 11.05-28.04 and 0.02-0.04 ng/m³, respectively, varying markedly according to the methods of application, e.g., formulations and nozzles. The inhalation risk assessment using present application methods appeared to be acceptable; however, the MOE of emamectin benzoate might be overestimated by 32% without considering inhalation bioaccessibility. Collectively, our findings contribute insights into the assessment of pesticide inhalation exposure based on bioaccessibility and provide guidance for the safe application of pesticides.

Estimating inhalation bioavailability for peptides and proteins 1 to 10 kDa in size

Inhalation is a critical route for occupational exposure. To protect workers from adverse effects, health-based exposure limits (HBELs) are derived using chemical-specific information including inhalation bioavailability. Inhalation bioavailability of large proteins is well studied and generally accepted to be 1% or less. However, the inhalation bioavailability of peptides and proteins 1-10 kDa in size is not well defined. The goal of this study was to expand upon previous analyses and evaluate the inhalation bioavailability of small peptides. Inhalation bioavailability data for 72 peptides and protein samples ranging from 1.1 to 10.9 kDa in size were evaluated. The median inhalation bioavailability was 20%, which is in agreement with previously published analyses. Inhalation bioavailabilities for the vast majority were below 50%. Interestingly, species, peptide size, and peptide identity did not correlate with inhalation bioavailability. Other factors including inhalation dosimetry, peptide degradation, and chemical characteristics also decrease the amount of peptide available for absorption. Together, the median bioavailability of 20% is likely an appropriate estimate of systemic exposure and is sufficiently protective in most cases for the purposes of occupational exposure safety. Thus, in the absence of peptide-specific data or concerns, an inhalation bioavailability default of 20% is recommended for 1-10 kDa peptide and proteins.

Approaches for setting occupational exposure limits in the pharmaceutical industry

The use of pharmaceutical drugs has provided a cure for many diseases. However, unintended exposure to drugs in the manufacturing workplace can cause significant health hazards to workers. It is important to protect the workforce from these deleterious effects by limiting exposure to an acceptable level, the occupational exposure limit (OEL). OEL is defined as airborne concentrations (expressed as a time-weighted average for a conventional 8-h workday and a 40-h work week) of a substance to which nearly all workers may be repeatedly exposed (for a working lifetime) without adverse effects. Determination of OELs has become very challenging over time, requiring an overall assessment of the preclinical and clinical data of the drug being manufactured. Previously, to derive OEL values, toxicologists used animal no-observed-adverse-effect level (NOAEL) data, which have been replaced with the overall assessment of animal and human data, placing a higher emphasis on human health-based data. A major advantage of working with human pharmaceuticals is that sufficient clinical data are available for them in most cases. The present manuscript reviews the latest knowledge regarding the derivation of occupational exposure limits as health-based exposure limits (HBELs) for pharmaceuticals. We have provided examples of OEL calculations for various drugs including levofloxacin (CAS No. 100986-85-4), dienogest (CAS no. 65928-58-7), and acetylsalicylic acid (ASA, CAS no. 50-78-2) using human data. This report will benefit professionals in the OEL domain in understanding this highly important, growing, and challenging field.

PEGylation of recombinant human deoxyribonuclease I decreases its transport across lung epithelial cells and uptake by macrophages

Conjugation to high molecular weight (MW ≥ 20 kDa) polyethylene glycol (PEG) was previously shown to largely prolong the lung residence time of recombinant human deoxyribonuclease I (rhDNase) and improve its therapeutic efficacy following pulmonary delivery in mice. In this paper, we investigated the mechanisms promoting the extended lung retention of PEG-rhDNase conjugates using cell culture models and lung biological media. Uptake by alveolar macrophages was also assessed in vivo. Transport experiments showed that PEGylation reduced the uptake and transport of rhDNase across monolayers of Calu-3 cells cultured at an air-liquid interface. PEGylation also decreased the uptake of rhDNase by macrophages in vitro whatever the PEG size as well as in vivo 4 h following intratracheal instillation in mice. However, the reverse was observed in vivo at 24 h due to the higher availability of PEGylated rhDNase in lung airways at 24 h compared with rhDNase, which is cleared faster. The uptake of rhDNase by macrophages was dependent on energy, time, and concentration and occurred at rates indicative of adsorptive endocytosis. The diffusion of PEGylated rhDNase in porcine tracheal mucus and cystic fibrosis sputa was slower compared with that of rhDNase. Nevertheless, no significant binding of PEGylated rhDNase to both media was observed. In conclusion, decreased transport across lung epithelial cells and uptake by macrophages appear to contribute to the longer retention of PEGylated rhDNase in the lungs.

Considerations for setting occupational exposure limits for novel pharmaceutical modalities

In order to develop new and effective medicines, pharmaceutical companies must be modality agnostic. As science reveals an enhanced understanding of biological processes, new therapeutic modalities are becoming important in developing breakthrough therapies to treat both rare and common diseases. As these new modalities progress, concern and uncertainty arise regarding their safe handling by the researchers developing them, employees manufacturing them and nurses administering them. This manuscript reviews the available literature for emerging modalities (including oligonucleotides, monoclonal antibodies, fusion proteins and bispecific antibodies, antibody-drug conjugates, peptides, vaccines, genetically modified organisms, and several others) and provides considerations for occupational health and safety-oriented hazard identification and risk assessments to enable timely, consistent and well-informed hazard identification, hazard communication and risk-management decisions. This manuscript also points out instances where historical exposure control banding systems may not be applicable (e.g. oncolytic viruses, biologics) and where other occupational exposure limit systems are more applicable (e.g. Biosafety Levels, Biologic Control Categories).

•

Review of toxicology and pharmacology information for novel therapeutic modalities.

•

Identification of occupational hazards associated with novel therapeutic modalities.

•

Occupational hazards and exposure risks differ across pharmaceutical modalities.

•

Occupational exposure control banding systems are not one size fits all.

•

Banding system variations offer benefits while enabling proper exposure controls.

Airway Delivery of Anti-influenza Monoclonal Antibodies Results in Enhanced Antiviral Activities and Enables Broad-Coverage Combination Therapies

Influenza causes widespread illness in humans and can result in morbidity and death, especially in the very young and elderly populations. Because influenza vaccination can be poorly effective some years, and the immune systems of the most susceptible populations are often compromised, passive immunization treatments using broadly neutralizing antibodies is a promising therapeutic approach. However, large amounts of a single antibody are required for effectiveness when delivered through systemic administration (typically intravenous infusion), precluding the feasible dosing of antibody combinations via this route. The significance of our research is the demonstration that effective therapeutic treatments of multiple relevant influenza types (H1N1, H3N2, and B) can be achieved by airway administration of a single combination of relatively small amounts of three anti-influenza antibodies. This advance exploits the discovery that airway delivery is a more potent way of administering anti-influenza antibodies compared to systemic delivery, making this a feasible and cost-effective therapeutic approach.

Effective and reliable anti-influenza treatments are acutely needed and passive immunizations using broadly neutralizing anti-influenza monoclonal antibodies (bNAbs) are a promising emerging approach. Because influenza infections are initiated in and localized to the pulmonary tract, and newly formed viral particles egress from the apical side of the lung epithelium, we compared the effectiveness of hemagglutinin (HA) stalk-binding bNAbs administered through the airway (intranasal or via nebulization) versus the systemic route (intraperitoneal or intravenous). Airway deliveries of various bNAbs were 10- to 50-fold more effective than systemic deliveries of the same bNAbs in treating H1N1, H3N2, B/Victoria-, and B/Yamagata-lineage influenza viral infections in mouse models. The potency of airway-delivered anti-HA bNAbs was highly dependent on antiviral neutralization activity, with little dependence on the effector function of the antibody. In contrast, the effectiveness of systemically delivered anti-HA bNAbs was not dependent on antiviral neutralization, but critically dependent on antibody effector functions. Concurrent administration of a neutralizing/effector function-positive bNAb via the airway and systemic routes showed increased effectiveness. The small amount of airway-delivered bNAbs needed for effective influenza treatment creates the opportunity to combine potent bNAbs with different anti-influenza specificities to generate a cost-effective antiviral therapy that provides broad coverage against all circulating influenza strains infecting humans. A 3 mg/kg dose of the novel triple antibody combination CF-404 (i.e., 1 mg/kg of each component bNAb) delivered to the airway was shown to effectively prevent weight loss and death in mice challenged with ten 50% lethal dose (LD₅₀) inoculums of either H1N1, H3N2, B/Victoria-lineage, or B/Yamagata-lineage influenza viruses.

IMPORTANCE Influenza causes widespread illness in humans and can result in morbidity and death, especially in the very young and elderly populations. Because influenza vaccination can be poorly effective some years, and the immune systems of the most susceptible populations are often compromised, passive immunization treatments using broadly neutralizing antibodies is a promising therapeutic approach. However, large amounts of a single antibody are required for effectiveness when delivered through systemic administration (typically intravenous infusion), precluding the feasible dosing of antibody combinations via this route. The significance of our research is the demonstration that effective therapeutic treatments of multiple relevant influenza types (H1N1, H3N2, and B) can be achieved by airway administration of a single combination of relatively small amounts of three anti-influenza antibodies. This advance exploits the discovery that airway delivery is a more potent way of administering anti-influenza antibodies compared to systemic delivery, making this a feasible and cost-effective therapeutic approach.