1
|
Sierocinski E, Mathias L, Freyer Martins Pereira J, Chenot JF. Postgraduate medical training in Germany: A narrative review. GMS JOURNAL FOR MEDICAL EDUCATION 2022; 39:Doc49. [PMID: 36540556 PMCID: PMC9733474 DOI: 10.3205/zma001570] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2022] [Revised: 06/30/2022] [Accepted: 08/16/2022] [Indexed: 06/17/2023]
Abstract
The structure and content of the training phase following completion of medical school, referred to in most countries as postgraduate medical training, varies between countries. The purpose of this article is to give national and international readers an overview of the organisation and structure of postgraduate medical training in Germany. The content and duration of postgraduate training in Germany are stipulated by state medical boards, officially termed associations (Landesärztekammer). In a periodically updated decree, the federal German medical association (Bundesärztekammer) provides a template for postgraduate medical training structure (Musterweiterbildungsordnung), which is adapted by the state medical associations. Admission to postgraduate medical training in Germany takes place by way of open, free-market selection. Based on the traditional assumption that junior doctors acquire all necessary clinical skills "on the job", formal education in the form of seminars, lectures, or preorganised, detailed rotation plans through various specialties or wards is largely absent. Requirements for postgraduate medical training focus on the fulfilment of broad categories of rotations rather than specific content or gaining competencies. With few exceptions, no structured educational programs with curricular learning objectives exist. Limited funding impedes program development and expansion. Junior doctors bear the primary organisational responsibility in their training, which often results in extended training times and dissatisfaction. Structured training programs which prioritise skill-building and formal education are needed to support junior doctors and ensure their competence in primary and specialty care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth Sierocinski
- Greifswald University Medical Center, Institute for Community Medicine, Department of General Practice, Greifswald, Germany
| | - Leonard Mathias
- Greifswald University Medical Center, Institute for Community Medicine, Department of General Practice, Greifswald, Germany
| | - Julia Freyer Martins Pereira
- Greifswald University Medical Center, Institute for Community Medicine, Department of General Practice, Greifswald, Germany
| | - Jean-François Chenot
- Greifswald University Medical Center, Institute for Community Medicine, Department of General Practice, Greifswald, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Schwill S, Kadmon M, Hahn EG, Kunisch R, Berberat PO, Fehr F, Hennel E. The WFME global standards for quality improvement of postgraduate medical education: Which standards are also applicable in Germany? Recommendations for physicians with a license for postgraduate training and training agents. GMS JOURNAL FOR MEDICAL EDUCATION 2022; 39:Doc42. [PMID: 36310882 PMCID: PMC9585417 DOI: 10.3205/zma001563] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2021] [Revised: 06/02/2022] [Accepted: 07/05/2022] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
Background: In Germany, the (model) regulation for postgraduate medical education 2018, the professional codes of conduct of the regional medical councils and the health professions chamber laws of the federal states are the formal basis of postgraduate medical education, but say little about its structure, processes and results. The World Federation for Medical Education (WFME) has developed global standards for improving the quality of postgraduate medical education and published them in a revised edition in 2015. A German version which takes the specifics of medical training in Germany into account has not been published to date. Objective: The Committee for Postgraduate Medical Education (PGME) of the Society for Medical Education (GMA) has set itself the goal of firstly translating the WFME standards into German and secondly making recommendations for physicians with a license for post-graduate training (PLT) and training agents (TA) in clinics and practices which have been adapted to the German context. Methods: The WFME standards were translated into German by a working group of the GMA Committee for PGME, the terminology adapted to PGME in Germany and checked by an interdisciplinary panel of experts made up of 9 members of the committee. In a second step, the WFME basic standards and quality standards for PGME relevant to PLTs and TAs in Germany were iteratively determined by this panel of experts using the Nominal Group Technique (NGT) and compiled in the form of recommendations. Results: The translation of the WFME guidelines was approved by the expert group without any changes to the content, taking into account the terminological system of PGME in Germany. In a second step, 90 standards were identified which were considered helpful for PGME in Germany, especially for PLTs and TAs (such as development of a professional identity, a more patient-centered approach or support of self-directed learning). Care was taken to only give recommendations which can be influenced by PLTs and TAs. These standards have been summarized as recommendations to PLTs and TAs and take into account all chapters of the WFME standards. Conclusion: The WFME standards selected here are recommended to PLTs and TAs in clinics and practices to achieve high-quality PGME. Empirical longitudinal studies will be required to examine both the implementation and the results of applying the modified WFME criteria in Germany.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simon Schwill
- University Hospital Heidelberg, Department for General Practice and Healthcare Research, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Martina Kadmon
- University of Augsburg, Faculty of Medicine, Dean, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Eckhart G. Hahn
- Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen, Faculty of Medicine, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Raphael Kunisch
- University Hospital Erlangen, Institute for General Practice, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Pascal O. Berberat
- Technical University of Munich. Medical Education Center, Munich, Germany
| | - Folkert Fehr
- Dr. Folkert Fehr & Dr. Jan Buschmann Joint Practice, Sinsheim, Germany
| | - Eva Hennel
- University of Bern, Institute for Medical Education, Department for Assessment and Evaluation, Bern, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Förster C, Haumann H, Schwill S, Bischoff M, Portenhauser F, Stengel S, Barzel A, Koch R, Joos S. [The Logic Model - a rationale for an encompassing evaluation framework of the German Competence Centers for Postgraduate Medical Education in general practice]. ZEITSCHRIFT FUR EVIDENZ FORTBILDUNG UND QUALITAET IM GESUNDHEITSWESEN 2021; 165:77-82. [PMID: 34474993 DOI: 10.1016/j.zefq.2021.08.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2021] [Revised: 06/04/2021] [Accepted: 08/02/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Competence Centers for Postgraduate Medical Education (KW) established throughout Germany represent complex programs to increase the efficiency and quality of postgraduate medical education in general practice. So-called Logic Models serve as the framework for evaluations and quality management processes of complex programs in many areas. The aim of this article is to develop such a model, using the example of the Competence Center in Baden-Württemberg (KWBW) in order to structure its complex program logic and use it as a framework for future evaluations and quality management processes. METHODS The adaptation of the Logic Model to the KWBW took place in an informal, nominal group process with employees and participants of the program. RESULTS We identified 76 core elements of the KWBW. These core elements were classified in one of the five pillars of the Logic Model (input, activity, output, outcome and impact) and categorized according to fields of action and target groups. DISCUSSION The Logic Model, which was developed using the KWBW as an example, identifies and structures important core elements of a complex postgraduate medical training program for the first time. It seems to be well suited for visualizing the internal logic of this complex program and the interaction of the various elements within the KWBW. It can thus be used as the basis for a comprehensive and systematic evaluation concept and for quality assurance. CONCLUSION The model is also a prerequisite for comparative research questions of other university programs for postgraduate medical education and thus offers an opportunity for cooperative development efforts. This article therefore contributes to promoting quality in continuing medical training.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christian Förster
- Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, Institut für Allgemeinmedizin und Interprofessionelle Versorgung, Tübingen, Deutschland.
| | - Hannah Haumann
- Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, Institut für Allgemeinmedizin und Interprofessionelle Versorgung, Tübingen, Deutschland
| | - Simon Schwill
- Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Abteilung für Allgemeinmedizin und Versorgungsforschung, Heidelberg, Deutschland
| | - Martina Bischoff
- Universitätsklinikum Freiburg, Institut für Allgemeinmedizin, Freiburg, Deutschland
| | | | - Sandra Stengel
- Universitätsklinikum Freiburg, Institut für Allgemeinmedizin, Freiburg, Deutschland
| | - Anne Barzel
- Universitätsklinikum Ulm, Institut für Allgemeinmedizin, Ulm, Deutschland
| | - Roland Koch
- Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, Institut für Allgemeinmedizin und Interprofessionelle Versorgung, Tübingen, Deutschland
| | - Stefanie Joos
- Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, Institut für Allgemeinmedizin und Interprofessionelle Versorgung, Tübingen, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Sonntag U, Koch A, Bayer G, Heintze C, Döpfmer S. Train the trainer course for general practice trainers in ambulatory care: the Berlin model. GMS JOURNAL FOR MEDICAL EDUCATION 2020; 37:Doc28. [PMID: 32566730 PMCID: PMC7291383 DOI: 10.3205/zma001321] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2019] [Revised: 11/21/2019] [Accepted: 01/31/2020] [Indexed: 05/28/2023]
Abstract
Objective: Demands for a stronger competence orientation of specialty postgraduate medical training require the expansion of the didactic qualifications of those responsible for postgraduate medical training. In the context of the foundation of the Berlin competence center for postgraduate general practice training, a train the trainer basic seminar was designed together with the Berlin chamber of physicians. The seminar aims to convey formal-legal aspects in close connection with the development of didactic competences of the general practice trainers. This article presents the didactic concept, focal points and the schedule of the one-and-a-half-day seminar to be able to adapt it to one's own context. Methodology: After the seminars, participants filled out an evaluation form. The questionnaire included the subjective experiences of increased competence, the relevance of the contents, and the satisfaction with the structure and methods of the seminar. The data were analyzed descriptively. Results: Since June 2018, 46 general practice trainers have participated in one of three train the trainer seminars. 97.6% of the participants were very satisfied or satisfied with the overall seminar and felt that the timeframe was right, 92.7% would recommend the seminar to colleagues. 68.3% fully agreed that by attending the seminar they were able to improve their didactic skills, 90% were confident that they could integrate what they had learned into their work as general practice trainers. 85.4% stated that they had reflected on their role as trainers. In particular, the atmosphere, the high degree of interactivity and the protected framework for collegial exchange were positively emphasized. Conclusion: Together with the Berlin chamber of physicians, we succeeded in designing a train the trainer seminar which, on the one hand, met the needs of the general practice trainers for clarification of formal-legal questions of their further training activities and, on the other hand, allowed the further development of didactic skills. At the moment, a modular program is being planned in order to give general practice trainers the opportunity to expand their didactic competence and regularly exchange ideas with colleagues.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ulrike Sonntag
- Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Institut für Allgemeinmedizin, Kompetenzzentrum Weiterbildung Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Gudrun Bayer
- Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Institut für Allgemeinmedizin, Kompetenzzentrum Weiterbildung Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Christoph Heintze
- Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Institut für Allgemeinmedizin, Kompetenzzentrum Weiterbildung Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Susanne Döpfmer
- Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Institut für Allgemeinmedizin, Kompetenzzentrum Weiterbildung Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Schwill S, Magez J, Joos S, Steinhäuser J, Ledig T, Rubik A, Niebling W, Szecsenyi J, Flum E. New paths in post-graduate medical training in general practice - 8 years of experience with the pilot project Verbundweiterbildung plus Baden-Württemberg. GMS JOURNAL FOR MEDICAL EDUCATION 2017; 34:Doc62. [PMID: 29226230 PMCID: PMC5704616 DOI: 10.3205/zma001139] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2016] [Revised: 04/11/2017] [Accepted: 06/07/2017] [Indexed: 06/02/2023]
Abstract
Background: In face of the looming shortage of general practitioners, primary healthcare providers and post-graduate training in general practice are increasingly becoming part of the political agenda in Germany. In 2009 the program "Verbundweiterbildung plus Baden-Württemberg" (VWB plus BW) was developed by the Competence Center for General Practice in Baden-Wuerttemberg to ensure primary healthcare in the future by enhancing the attractiveness of general medicine. This paper describes the experiences that have been gathered in developing a post-graduate training-program for physicians undergoing specialist training in general practice. Project description: The Competence Center for General Practice in Baden-Wuerttemberg supports the organization of regional networks dedicated to post-graduate medical education. First core element of the VWB plus BW program is a special seminar series for physicians pursuing post-graduate training. This seminar program is aligned with the German competency-based curriculum in general medicine and is meant to promote medical expertise and other related competencies, such as business and medical practice management and communication skills. Mentoring and advising the physicians regarding professional and personal planning form the second core element. The third core element is seen in the train-the-trainer seminars that address the competencies of the trainers. In order to focus the program's content closely on the needs of the target groups, scientifically based evaluations and research are carried out. Results: Since starting in 2009, 685 physicians have entered the program and 141 have passed the examination to become medical specialists (as of December 2016). In total, 31 networks, 60 hospitals and 211 general practices have participated. The seminar sessions have been rated on average with 1.43 on a six-point Likert scale by the physician trainees (1=extremely satisfied, 6=extremely dissatisfied). Alongside the medical training, these physicians viewed the exchange of information and experiences with other physicians as very positive and important. In 185 seminars lasting 90 minutes each, the seminar program has presently covered 250 out of 320 units in the competency-based curriculum for general medicine. A total of 281 trainers have been trained in 13 train-the-trainer courses and have rated this course on average with 1.36 on a six-point Likert scale. Above all, the trainers emphasized the exchange of information and experiences with other trainers as very positive. In 2013 the DEGAM concept for its Verbundweiterbildungplus program was developed based on that of the VWB plus BW. Since 2008 over 40 articles on the topic of post-graduate medical education have been published. Conclusion: The steadily increasing number of participants over the years demonstrates that the VWB plus BW is relevant for recent medical graduates and contributes to the attractiveness of general practice. The consistently excellent evaluations of the training program and the train-the-trainer course affirm the focus on the needs of the target groups. The post-graduate VWB plus BW program advances structured, competency-based and quality-oriented specialist training and fosters professional sharing between physicians - something that could also be relevant for other fields. The increasing numbers of participating physicians and specialists in general practice in Baden-Württemberg lead to the conclusion that the VWB plus BW program positively influences the number of general practitioners.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simon Schwill
- University Hospital Heidelberg, Department of General Practice and Health Services Research, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Julia Magez
- University Hospital Heidelberg, Department of General Practice and Health Services Research, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Stefanie Joos
- University Hospital Tübingen, Institute of General Practice and Interprofessional Care, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Jost Steinhäuser
- University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Institute of Family Medicine, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Thomas Ledig
- University Hospital Heidelberg, Department of General Practice and Health Services Research, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Aline Rubik
- University Hospital Heidelberg, Department of General Practice and Health Services Research, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Wilhelm Niebling
- University Hospital Freiburg, Department of General Practice, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Joachim Szecsenyi
- University Hospital Heidelberg, Department of General Practice and Health Services Research, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Elisabeth Flum
- University Hospital Heidelberg, Department of General Practice and Health Services Research, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|