1
|
Nöst S, Miedaner F, Anke W, Beckmann M, Exworthy M, Götz K, Körner M, Mannion R, Pfaff H, Piotrowski A, Hammer A, Ansmann L. Organisational Health Services Research in Germany: A Scoping Review of Conference Abstracts. DAS GESUNDHEITSWESEN 2024; 86:S251-S258. [PMID: 38906174 DOI: 10.1055/a-2350-3857] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/23/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Health Services Research (HSR) is a growing field in Germany, in which Organisational Health Services Research (OHSR) has emerged as a subfield. The aim of this scoping review was to provide an overview of the field of OHSR within HSR in Germany and to map systematically original contributions by describing the organisational setting, the research design, the research objectives and the theoretical underpinning. METHODS A scoping review examined published abstracts from the 19th German Conference on Health Services Research 2020. Abstracts were included if (1) health care organisations, subunits or organisational processes were mentioned as research objects, and (2) if at least one out of five research perspectives from a recent German definition of OHSR was addressed. After intensive pilot screenings within a group of nine researchers, all abstracts were screened independently in three review teams with three researchers each, and data from included abstracts were extracted using content analysis based on a self-developed detailed coding scheme. RESULTS Out of n=468 identified abstracts in German (84%) or English (16%) language, n=138 (29.5%) abstracts were included. The majority of included abstracts addressed acute care in hospitals (34.8%), reported results from observational studies (59.4%) and collected primary data (69.6%). There was a slightly higher use of quantitative (32.6%) than qualitative (24.6%) research methods with a considerable number of studies using more than one method (31.9%). An explicit reference to theory was made in 7.2% and 17.4% used the term 'organisation' or related terms explicitly in their abstract. CONCLUSION This review provides a systematic but preliminary overview of the scope to which HSR in Germany addresses OHSR. The organisational perspective is considered extensively in HSR abstracts, but mostly implicitly. The research is reported largely free of theory which can reduce their explanatory power. Therefore, a research agenda, more awareness as well as education and better conceptualisation of OHSR topics within German HSR are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefan Nöst
- Baden-Württemberg Cooperative State University Stuttgart, School of Health Sciences and Management, Stuttgart, Germany
| | - Felix Miedaner
- Ostfalia University of Applied Sciences, Campus Wolfsburg, Faculty of Health Care and Health Care Science, Wolfsburg, Germany
| | - Wagner Anke
- University Hospital Tübingen, Institute of Occupational and Social Medicine and Health Services Research, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Marina Beckmann
- University of Cologne, Institute of Medical Sociology, Health Services Research and Rehabilitation Science (IMVR), Cologne, Germany
| | - Mark Exworthy
- University of Birmingham, Health Services Management Centre, Birmingham, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
| | - Katja Götz
- University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Institute of Family Medicine, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Mirjam Körner
- Bern University of Applied Sciences, School of Health Professions, Competence Center, Interprofessionalism, Bern, Switzerland
- University of Freiburg, Institute of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Russell Mannion
- University of Birmingham, Health Services Management Centre, Birmingham, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
| | | | - Alexandra Piotrowski
- Witten/Herdecke University, Institute of General Practice and Outpatient Healthcare, Witten, Germany
| | - Antje Hammer
- University of Bonn, Institute for Patient Safety, Bonn, Germany
| | - Lena Ansmann
- University of Cologne, Institute of Medical Sociology, Health Services Research and Rehabilitation Science (IMVR), Cologne, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kremeike K, Jünger S, Preiser C, Ullrich C, Xyländer M. [Opportunities and Challenges Of The Ethics Review Of Qualitative Health Services Research: A Survey Of Qualitative Researchers]. DAS GESUNDHEITSWESEN 2024; 86:567-572. [PMID: 38316407 PMCID: PMC11404343 DOI: 10.1055/a-2189-2563] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2024]
Abstract
Ethics committees ensure compliance with ethical principles in medical research. They are oriented towards clinical studies, but also review e. g., qualitative research. Using a semi-structured online survey, we collected data on experiences of qualitative researchers with the review by ethics committees and analysed them via content analysis. In July 2019, 73 researchers took part in the survey. Five main topics were derived from their statements regarding the ethics review of qualitative research: 1. relevance of qualitative research expertise; 2. cooperation between researchers and ethics committees; 3. transparency of review criteria; 4. dealing with formal review requirements; 5. evaluation of the review's significance for qualitative research. The results show the potential of ethics review for reflection on ethical questions in qualitative research. Prerequisites for this are the fit with the characteristics and quality criteria of qualitative research, the presence of qualitative research expertise in ethics committees, the transparency of the ethics review process as well as openness to different professional cultures and a constructive communication culture.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kerstin Kremeike
- Zentrum für Palliativmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Köln, Köln, Germany
| | - Saskia Jünger
- Department of Community Health, Hochschule für Gesundheit, Bochum, Germany
| | - Christine Preiser
- Institut für Arbeitsmedizin, Sozialmedizin und Versorgungsforschung, Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Charlotte Ullrich
- Abteilung für Allgemeinmedizin und Versorgungsforschung, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Margret Xyländer
- Institut für Rehabilitationswissenschaften, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Binder A, Preiser C, Hanke S, Banabak M, Huber C, Petersen KU, Batra A. Researching Alcohol Consumption During Pregnancy. Opportunities and Challenges With Two Methods of Data Acquisition. QUALITATIVE HEALTH RESEARCH 2022; 32:1809-1827. [PMID: 36017584 PMCID: PMC9511243 DOI: 10.1177/10497323221119005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
Qualitative research methods, primarily interviews, have become more common in the field of addiction research. Other data sources were often neglected, although sources such as social media can offer insights into the realities of people, since social media also plays a relevant role in today's living environments. This article examines the use of online forums as an underutilized data source in contrast to telephone interviews, to identify methodological opportunities and challenges. We analyzed nine discussion threads and seven interviews about 'alcohol consumption during pregnancy'. Discursive comparison of the results was performed with a focus on sampling issues, comparability and risks for participants and researchers. Key issues were present in both data sources. People with different opinions were openly hostile in forums, while tolerance was more often expressed in interviews. The interviews showed a rather mild communication style, which could be attributed to social desirability. In the forum discussions, the participants often expressed themselves very directly. To comprehensively grasp the subject matter of the research, it is important to recognize the types of communication promoted by different data sources. These results have implications for research about female substance use. Knowledge of the issues will bestow a valuable contribution to researchers working in the field of substance use to help develop appropriate research approaches, as they engage in research into this highly stigmatized and controversial area.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annette Binder
- Department of General Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Addiction Medicine and Addiction Research Section, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Christine Preiser
- Centre for Public Health and Health Services Research, Core Facility for Health Services Research, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
- Institute of Occupational and Social Medicine and Health Services Research, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Sara Hanke
- Department of General Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Addiction Medicine and Addiction Research Section, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Meryem Banabak
- Department of General Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Addiction Medicine and Addiction Research Section, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Clara Huber
- Department of General Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Addiction Medicine and Addiction Research Section, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Kay Uwe Petersen
- Department of General Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Addiction Medicine and Addiction Research Section, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Anil Batra
- Department of General Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Addiction Medicine and Addiction Research Section, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|