Determination of recombination and polarity correction factors, k S and k P , for small cylindrical ionization chambers PTW 31021 and PTW 31022 in pulsed filtered and unfiltered beams

Measurement of the small field output factors for 10 MV photon beam using IAEA TRS-483 dosimetry protocol and implementation in Eclipse TPS commissioning

Dosimetry of small fields (SF) is vital for the success of highly conformal techniques. IAEA along with AAPM recently published a code of practice TRS-483 for SF dosimetry. The scope of this paper is to investigate the performance of three different detectors with 10 MV with-flatting-filter (WFF) beam using TRS-483 for SF dosimetry and subsequent commissioning of the Eclipse treatment planning system (TPS version-13.6) for SF data. SF dosimetry data (beam-quality TPR 20,10(10), cross-calibration, beam-profile, and field-output-factor (F.O.F)) measurements were performed for PTW31006-pinpoint, IBA-CC01 and IBA-EFD-3G diode detectors in nominal field size (F.S) range 0.5 × 0.5cm2 to 10 × 10 cm2 with water and solid water medium using Varian Truebeam linac. However, Eclipse-TPS commissioning data was acquired using IBA-EFD-3G diode, and absolute dose calibration was performed with FC-65G detector. The dosimetric performance of the Eclipse-TPS was validated using TLD-LiF chips, IBA-PFD, and IBA-EFD-3G diodes. Dosimetric performance of the PTW31006-pinpoint, IBA-CC01, and IBA-EFD-3G detectors was successfully tested for SF dosimetry. The F.O.Fs were generated and found in close agreement for all F.S except 0.5 × 0.5cm2. It is also found that TPR20,10(10) value can be derived within 0.5% accuracy from a non-reference field using Palmans equation. Cross-calibration can be performed in F.S 6 × 6 cm2 with a maximum variation of 0.5% with respect to 10 × 10cm2. During profile measurement, the full-width half-maxima (FWHM) of F.S 0.5 × 0.5cm2 was found maximum deviated from the geometric F.S. In addition, Eclipse-TPS was commissioned along with some limitations: F.O.F below F.S 1 × 1cm2 was ignored by TPS, PDD and profiles were dropped from configuration below F.S 2 × 2 cm2, and F.O.F which does not satisfy the condition 0.7 < A/B < 1.4 (A and B are FWHM in cross-line and in-line direction) have higher uncertainty than specified in TRS-483. Validation tests for Eclipse-TPS generated plans were also performed. The measured dose was in close agreement (3%) with TPS calculated dose up to F.S 1.5 × 1.5cm2.

The impact of scanning data measurements on the Acuros dose calculation algorithm configuration

Background

Many dose calculation algorithms for radiotherapy planning need to be configured for each clinical beam using pre-defined measurements. An optimization process adjusts the physical parameters able to estimate the energy released in the medium in any geometrical condition. This work investigates the impact of measured input data quality on the configuration of the type “c” Acuros-XB dose calculation algorithm in the Eclipse (Varian Medical Systems) treatment planning system.

Methods

Different datasets were acquired with the BeamScan water phantom (PTW) to configure 6 MV beams, for both flattened (6X) and flattening filter free mode (6FFF) for a Varian TrueBeam: (i) a correct dataset measured using a Semiflex-3D ion chamber, (ii) a set in missing lateral scatter conditions (MLS), (iii) a set with incorrect effective point of measurement (EPoM), (iv) sets acquired with PinPoint-3D chamber, DiodeP, microDiamond detectors.

The Acuros-XB dose calculation algorithm (version 15.6) was configured using the reference dataset, the sets measured with the different detectors, with intentional errors, and using the representative beam data (RBD) made available by the vendor. The physical parameters obtained from each optimization process (spectrum, mean radial energy, electron contamination), were analyzed and compared. Calculated data were finally compared against the input and reference measurements.

Results

Concerning the physical parameters, the configurations presenting the largest differences were the MLS conditions (mean radial energy) and the incorrect EPoM (electron contamination). The calculation doses relative to the input data present low accuracy, with mean differences > 2% in some conditions. The PinPoint-3D ion chamber presented lower accuracy for the 6FFF beam. Regarding the RBD, calculations compared well with the input data used for the configuration, but not with the reference data.

Conclusion

The MLS conditions and the incorrect setting of the EPoM lead to erroneous configurations and should be avoided. The choice of an appropriate detector is important. Whenever the representative beam data is used, a careful check under more clinical geometrical conditions is advised.

Output correction factors for small static fields in megavoltage photon beams for seven ionization chambers in two orientations - perpendicular and parallel

Purpose

The goal of the present work was to provide a large set of detector‐specific output correction factors for seven small volume ionization chambers on two linear accelerators in four megavoltage photon beams utilizing perpendicular and parallel orientation of ionization chambers in the beam for nominal field sizes ranging from 0.5 cm² × 0.5 cm² to 10 cm² × 10 cm². The present study is the second part of an extensive research conducted by our group.

Methods

Output correction factors kQclin,Qreffclin,fref were experimentally determined on two linacs, Elekta Versa HD and Varian TrueBeam for 6 and 10 MV beams with and without flattening filter for nine square fields ranging from 0.5 cm² × 0.5 cm² to 10 cm² × 10 cm², for seven mini and micro ionization chambers, IBA CC04, IBA Razor, PTW 31016 3D PinPoint, PTW 31021 3D Semiflex, PTW 31022 3D PinPoint, PTW 31023 PinPoint, and SI Exradin A16. An Exradin W1 plastic scintillator and EBT3 radiochromic films were used as the reference detectors.

Results

For all ionization chambers, values of output correction factors kQclin,Qreffclin,fref were lower for parallel orientation compared to those obtained in the perpendicular orientation. Five ionization chambers from our study set, IBA Razor, PTW 31016 3D PinPoint, PTW 31022 3D PinPoint, PTW 31023 PinPoint, and SI Exradin A16, fulfill the requirement recommended in the TRS‐483 Code of Practice, that is, 0.95<kQclin,Qreffclin,fref<1.05, down to the field size 0.8 cm² × 0.8 cm², when they are positioned in parallel orientation; two of the ionization chambers, IBA Razor and PTW 31023 PinPoint, satisfy this condition down to the field size of 0.5 cm² × 0.5 cm².

Conclusions

The present paper provides experimental results of detector‐specific output correction factors for seven small volume ionization chambers. Output correction factors were determined in 6 and 10 MV photon beams with and without flattening filter down to the square field size of 0.5 cm² × 0.5 cm² for two orientations of ionization chambers — perpendicular and parallel. Our main finding is that output correction factors are smaller if they are determined in a parallel orientation compared to those obtained in a perpendicular orientation for all ionization chambers regardless of the photon beam energy, filtration, or linear accelerator being used. Based on our findings, we recommend using ionization chambers in parallel orientation, to minimize corrections in the experimental determination of field output factors. Latter holds even for field sizes below 1.0 cm² × 1.0 cm², whenever necessary corrections remain within 5%, which was the case for several ionization chambers from our set.

TRS‐483 recommended perpendicular orientation of ionization chambers for the determination of field output factors. The present study presents results for both perpendicular and parallel orientation of ionization chambers. When validated by other researchers, the present results for parallel orientation can be considered as a complementary dataset to those given in TRS‐483.

Assessment of ion recombination correction and polarity effects for specific ionization chambers in flattening-filter-free photon beams

PURPOSE

To investigate ion recombination correction and polarity effects in four ion chamber models in flattening-filter-free (FFF) beams to (1) evaluate their suitability for reference dosimetry; (2) assess the accuracy of the two-voltage technique (TVA) against the Bruggmoser formalism; and (3) examine the influence of the accelerator type on the recombination correction.

METHODS

Jaffé plots were created for a variety of microchambers, small-volume and Farmer-type chambers to obtain k_S, the recombination correction factor, using two different types of accelerators. These values were plotted against dose-per-pulse and Jaffé plots for opposite polarities were created to determine which chambers meet the AAPM TG-51 addendum recombination and polarity specifications.

RESULTS

Nearly all small-volume chambers exhibited reference-class behavior with respect to ion recombination and polarity effects. The microchambers exhibited anomalous recombination and polarity effects, precluding their use for reference dosimetry in FFF beams. For the reference-class chambers, agreement between TVA-determined k_S values and Jaffé and Bruggmoser formalisms-determined k_S values was within 0.1%. No significant differences were found between the k_S values obtained with the two different accelerators used in this work.

CONCLUSIONS

This study stresses the need to characterize ion recombination correction and polarity effects for small-volume chambers and microchambers on an individual chamber basis and with the more rigorous criteria of the AAPM TG-51 addendum. Furthermore, the study demonstrated the suitability of the TVA method for chambers that exhibit reference-class behavior in FFF beams. Finally, this work has shown that the recombination correction does not depend on the type of accelerator but on its dose-per-pulse.

Experimental and Monte-Carlo characterization of the novel compact ionization chamber PTW 31023 for reference and relative dosimetry in high energy photon beams

INTRODUCTION

The aim of the present work is to perform dosimetric characterization of a novel vented PinPoint ionization chamber (PTW 31023, PTW-Freiburg, Germany). This chamber replaces the previous model (PTW 31014), where the diameter of the central electrode has been increased from 0.3 to 0.6mm and the guard ring has been redesigned. Correction factors for reference and non-reference measurement conditions were examined.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Measurements and calculations of the correction factors were performed according to the DIN 6800-2. The shifts of the effective point of measurement (EPOM) from the chamber's reference point were determined by comparison of the measured PDD with the reference curve obtained with a Roos chamber. Its lateral dose response functions, which act according to a mathematical convolution model as the convolution kernel transforming the dose profile D(x) to the measured signal M(x), have been approximated by Gaussian functions with standard deviation σ. Additionally, the saturation correction factors k_S have been determined using different dose-per-pulse (DPP) values. The polarity effect correction factors k_P were measured for field sizes from 5cm×5cm to 40cm×40cm. The influence of the diameter of the central electrode and the new guard ring on the beam quality correction factors k_Q was studied by Monte-Carlo simulations. The non-reference condition correction factors k_NR have been computed for 6MV photo beam by varying the field size and measurement depth. Comparisons on these aspects have been made to the previous model.

RESULTS

The shifts of the EPOM from the reference point, Δz, are found to be -0.55 (6MV) and -0.56 (10MV) in the radial orientation and -0.97mm (6MV) and -0.91mm (10MV) in the axial orientation. All values of Δz have an uncertainty of 0.1mm. The σ values are 0.80mm (axial), 0.75mm (radial lateral) and 1.76mm (radial longitudinal) for 6MV photon beam and are 0.85mm (axial), 0.75mm (radial lateral) and 1.82mm (radial longitudinal) for 15MV photon beam. All σ values have an uncertainty of 0.05mm. The correction factor k_S was found to be 1.0034±0.0009 for the PTW 31014 chamber and 1.0024±0.0007 for the PTW 31023 chamber at the highest DPP (0.827mGy) investigated in this study. Under reference conditions, the polarity effect correction factor k_P of the PTW 31014 chamber is 1.0094 and 1.0116 for 6 and 10MV respectively, while the k_P of the PTW 31023 chamber is 1.0005 and 1.0013 for 6 and 10MV respectively, all values have an uncertainty of 0.002. The k_P of the new chamber also exhibits a weaker field size dependence. The k_Q values of the PTW 31023 chamber are closer to unity than those of the PTW 31014 chamber due to the thicker central electrode and the new guard ring design. The k_NR values of the PTW 31023 chamber for 6MV photon beam deviate by not more than 1% from unity for the conditions investigated.

DISCUSSIONS

Correction factors associated with the new chamber required to perform reference and relative dose measurements have been determined according to the DIN-protocol. The correction factor k_S of the new chamber is 0.1% smaller than that of the PTW 31014 at the highest DPP investigated. Under reference conditions, the correction factor k_P of the PTW 31023 chamber is approximately 1% smaller than that of the PTW 31014 chamber for both energies used. The dosimetric characteristics of the new chamber investigated in this work have been demonstrated to fulfil the requirements of the TG-51 addendum for reference-class dosimeters at reference conditions.