1
|
Njeh CF, Saunders MW, Langton CM. Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation (APBI): A review of available techniques. Radiat Oncol 2010; 5:90. [PMID: 20920346 PMCID: PMC2958971 DOI: 10.1186/1748-717x-5-90] [Citation(s) in RCA: 144] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2010] [Accepted: 10/04/2010] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Breast conservation therapy (BCT) is the procedure of choice for the management of the early stage breast cancer. However, its utilization has not been maximized because of logistics issues associated with the protracted treatment involved with the radiation treatment. Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation (APBI) is an approach that treats only the lumpectomy bed plus a 1-2 cm margin, rather than the whole breast. Hence because of the small volume of irradiation a higher dose can be delivered in a shorter period of time. There has been growing interest for APBI and various approaches have been developed under phase I-III clinical studies; these include multicatheter interstitial brachytherapy, balloon catheter brachytherapy, conformal external beam radiation therapy and intra-operative radiation therapy (IORT). Balloon-based brachytherapy approaches include Mammosite, Axxent electronic brachytherapy and Contura, Hybrid brachytherapy devices include SAVI and ClearPath. This paper reviews the different techniques, identifying the weaknesses and strength of each approach and proposes a direction for future research and development. It is evident that APBI will play a role in the management of a selected group of early breast cancer. However, the relative role of the different techniques is yet to be clearly identified.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher F Njeh
- Radiation Oncology Department, Texas Oncology Tyler, 910 East Houston Street, Tyler, Texas, USA
| | - Mark W Saunders
- Radiation Oncology Department, Texas Oncology Tyler, 910 East Houston Street, Tyler, Texas, USA
| | - Christian M Langton
- Physics, Faculty of Science and Technology, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Gao S, Delclos ME, Tomas LC, Crane CH, Beddar S. High-dose-rate remote afterloaders for intraoperative radiation therapy. AORN J 2008; 86:827-36; quiz 837-40. [PMID: 18050890 DOI: 10.1016/j.aorn.2007.07.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT) is a treatment option that directly irradiates a surgically exposed tumor or tumor bed while preventing radiation exposure of normal tissues. This article discusses the high-dose-rate intraoperative radiation therapy (HDR-IORT) technique by reviewing the roles of IORT team members, discussing needed equipment and supplies, describing quality assurance processes, explaining the HDR-IORT treatment delivery procedure, and reviewing the post-treatment phase.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Song Gao
- Department of Radiation Physics at the University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Beddar AS, Briere TM, Ouzidane M. Intraoperative radiation therapy using a mobile electron linear accelerator: field matching for large-field electron irradiation. Phys Med Biol 2006; 51:N331-7. [PMID: 16953035 DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/51/18/n01] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
Intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT) consists of delivering a large, single-fraction dose of radiation to a surgically exposed tumour or tumour bed at the time of surgery. With the availability of a mobile linear accelerator in the OR, IORT procedures have become more feasible for medical centres and more accessible to cancer patients. Often the area requiring irradiation is larger than what the treatment applicators will allow, and therefore, two or more adjoining fields are used. Unfortunately, the divergence and scattering of the electron beams may cause significant dose variations in the region of the field junction. Furthermore, because IORT treatments are delivered in a large single fraction, the effects of underdosing or overdosing could be more critical when compared to fractionated external beam therapy. Proper matching of the fields is therefore an important technical aspect of treatment delivery. We have studied the matching region using the largest flat applicator available for three different possibilities: abutting the fields, leaving a small gap or creating an overlap. Measurements were done using film dosimetry for the available energies of 4, 6, 9 and 12 MeV. Our results show the presence of clinically significant cold spots for the low-energy beams when the fields are either gapped or abutted, suggesting that the fields should be overlapped. No fields should be gapped. The results suggest that an optimal dose distribution may be obtained by overlapping the fields at 4 and 6 MeV and simply abutting the fields at 9 and 12 MeV. However, due to uncertainties in the placement of lead shields during treatment delivery, one may wish to consider overlapping the higher energy fields as well.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A S Beddar
- Department of Radiation Physics, Division of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas M D Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Box 94, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Beddar AS, Biggs PJ, Chang S, Ezzell GA, Faddegon BA, Hensley FW, Mills MD. Intraoperative radiation therapy using mobile electron linear accelerators: report of AAPM Radiation Therapy Committee Task Group No. 72. Med Phys 2006; 33:1476-89. [PMID: 16752582 DOI: 10.1118/1.2194447] [Citation(s) in RCA: 80] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
Abstract
Intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT) has been customarily performed either in a shielded operating suite located in the operating room (OR) or in a shielded treatment room located within the Department of Radiation Oncology. In both cases, this cancer treatment modality uses stationary linear accelerators. With the development of new technology, mobile linear accelerators have recently become available for IORT. Mobility offers flexibility in treatment location and is leading to a renewed interest in IORT. These mobile accelerator units, which can be transported any day of use to almost any location within a hospital setting, are assembled in a nondedicated environment and used to deliver IORT. Numerous aspects of the design of these new units differ from that of conventional linear accelerators. The scope of this Task Group (TG-72) will focus on items that particularly apply to mobile IORT electron systems. More specifically, the charges to this Task Group are to (i) identify the key differences between stationary and mobile electron linear accelerators used for IORT, (ii) describe and recommend the implementation of an IORT program within the OR environment, (iii) present and discuss radiation protection issues and consequences of working within a nondedicated radiotherapy environment, (iv) describe and recommend the acceptance and machine commissioning of items that are specific to mobile electron linear accelerators, and (v) design and recommend an efficient quality assurance program for mobile systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Sam Beddar
- Department of Radiation Physics, Division of Radiation Oncology, Unit 94, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas 77030, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Calvo FA, Meirino RM, Orecchia R. Intraoperative radiation therapy first part: rationale and techniques. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2006; 59:106-15. [PMID: 16844383 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2005.11.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 64] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2005] [Revised: 11/17/2005] [Accepted: 11/17/2005] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) is a technique where a high, single-fraction radiation dose is delivered during a surgical procedure to macroscopic tumours or tumour beds with minimal exposure of surroundings tissues which are displaced and shielded during the procedure. In this paper, the rationale for and use of IORT, both with electron beams (IOERT) and high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR-IORT) are discussed. For most tumours, the likelihood of obtaining local control (LC) improves when increasing doses can be administered. In many clinical situations, however, the dose that can be delivered safely to the tumour target is limited by the risk of damaging normal tissues. Special consideration is therefore given on this paper to the relationship between dose, LC and possible complications. Criteria for patient's selection and evaluation and information on sequencing and techniques are presented as well as some considerations on the need for a proper programme on quality assurance and periodical reporting of data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Felipe A Calvo
- Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañon, Madrid, Spain.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Beddar AS. Stability of a mobile electron linear accelerator system for intraoperative radiation therapy. Med Phys 2005; 32:3128-31. [PMID: 16279065 DOI: 10.1118/1.2044432] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
Abstract
The flexibility of mobile electron accelerators, which are designed to be transported to an operating room and plugged into a normal 3-phase outlet, make them ideal for use in intraoperative radiation therapy. However, their transportability may cause trepidation among potential users, who may question the stability of such an accelerator over a period of use. In order to address this issue, we have studied the short-term stability of the Mobetron system over 20 daily quality assurance trials. Variations in output generally varied within +/-2% for the four energies produced by the unit (4, 6, 9, and 12 MeV) and changes in energy produced an equivalent shift of less than 1 mm on the depth-dose curve. Hours of inactivity, with the Mobetron powered on for use either throughout the day or overnight, led to variations in output of about 1%. Finally, we have tested the long-term stability of the absolute dose output of the Mobetron, which showed a change of about 1% per year.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Sam Beddar
- Department of Radiation Physics, Division of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas 77030, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Beddar AS, Krishnan S. Intraoperative radiotherapy using a mobile electron LINAC: a retroperitoneal sarcoma case. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2005; 6:95-107. [PMID: 16143794 PMCID: PMC5723491 DOI: 10.1120/jacmp.v6i3.2109] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
The advent of mobile LINACs for use in intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT) promises to make IORT more accessible than before and easier to deliver to patients undergoing surgery. Although mobile IORT systems have been available since 1999, few treatment centers currently use them. Here, we present the case of a typical patient undergoing IORT for retroperitoneal sarcoma to show how easy these mobile systems are to use and how adaptable they are within the operating room (OR) environment. We also discuss the roles and coordination of multidisciplinary team members during IORT and the feasibility of using mobile LINACs for IORT. PACS number(s):
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Sam Beddar
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas 77030, USA.
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Beddar AS, Tailor RC. Calibration of low-energy electron beams from a mobile linear accelerator with plane-parallel chambers using both TG-51 and TG-21 protocols. Phys Med Biol 2004; 49:N105-10. [PMID: 15152696 DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/49/8/n02] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
A new approach to intraoperative radiation therapy led to the development of mobile linear electron accelerators that provide lower electron energy beams than the usual conventional accelerators commonly encountered in radiotherapy. Such mobile electron accelerators produce electron beams that have nominal energies of 4, 6, 9 and 12 MeV. This work compares the absorbed dose output calibrations using both the AAPM TG-51 and TG-21 dose calibration protocols for two types of ion chambers: a plane-parallel (PP) ionization chamber and a cylindrical ionization chamber. Our results indicate that the use of a 'Markus' PP chamber causes 2-3% overestimation in dose-output determination if accredited dosimetry-calibration laboratory based chamber factors (N(60Co)(D,w,) Nx) are used. However, if the ionization chamber factors are derived using a cross-comparison at a high-energy electron beam, then a good agreement is obtained (within 1%) with a calibrated cylindrical chamber over the entire energy range down to 4 MeV. Furthermore, even though the TG-51 does not recommend using cylindrical chambers at the low energies, our results show that the cylindrical chamber has a good agreement with the PP chamber not only at 6 MeV but also down to 4 MeV electron beams.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A S Beddar
- Department of Radiation Physics, Division of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Centre, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Abstract
In single-institution studies, IORT at appropriate doses seems to safely improve local control in patients who have locally advanced pancreatic cancer, compared with historical controls. IORT also has been a component of adjuvant treatment programs that have led to excellent local control in resected patients. When considering the use of IORT, it is essential to have an understanding of the physical characteristics of the electron beam and how it can differ with the use of flat and beveled applicators. Although apparent improvement in local control with the use of IORT seems to have produced some improvement in median survival rates, high rates of distant failure continues to prevent a significant improvement in long-term survival. Because effective local control in patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer is a prerequisite to the development of curative therapies, the development of improved systemic therapies in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer will likely make local therapies such as the use of IORT even more important in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher H Crane
- Gastrointestinal Section, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Box 97, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Goer DA, Musslewhite CW, Jablons DM. Potential of mobile intraoperative radiotherapy technology. Surg Oncol Clin N Am 2003; 12:943-54. [PMID: 14989125 DOI: 10.1016/s1055-3207(03)00093-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Mobile IORT units have the potential to change the way patients who have cancer are treated. The integration of IORT into cancer treatment programs, made possible by the new technologies of mobile linear accelerators that can be used in unshielded operating rooms, makes IORT significantly less time-consuming, less costly, and less risky to administer. It is now practical for IORT to be used in early-stage disease, in addition to advanced disease, and in sites for which patient transportation in the middle of surgery is considered too risky. Preliminary results of trials for early-stage breast and rectal cancer indicate benefits of IORT. Pediatric patients and patients who have lung cancer, previously underserved by IORT therapies, can be offered potential gains when patient transport issues do not limit IORT. Furthermore, because many of these mobile systems require no shielding, it is now practical for mobile units to be shared between hospitals, making this new mobile technology much more widely available.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Donald A Goer
- Intraop Medical, Inc., 3170 De La Cruz Boulevard, Suite 108, Santa Clara, CA 95054, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Domanovic MA, Ouzidane M, Ellis RJ, Kinsella TJ, Beddar AS. Using intraoperative radiation therapy--a case study. AORN J 2003; 77:412-7. [PMID: 12619854 DOI: 10.1016/s0001-2092(06)61208-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
The introduction of a mobile linear accelerator in the OR has made intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT) more plausible. An IORT treatment can deliver a single high dose of radiation to a tumor or tumor bed after surgical resection or surgical exposure of high risk areas. This article details a case study in which IORT was used on a patient with sigmoid carcinoma and the procedure outcomes.
Collapse
|
12
|
Beddar AS, Domanovic MA, Kubu ML, Ellis RJ, Sibata CH, Kinsella TJ. Mobile linear accelerators for intraoperative radiation therapy. AORN J 2001; 74:700-5. [PMID: 11725448 DOI: 10.1016/s0001-2092(06)61769-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
Intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT) is becoming an increasingly common procedure for treating gross tumors or tumor beds after resection. Traditionally, IORT delivery required either heavily shielded ORs or transporting anesthetized patients to the department of radiation oncology. The availability of a self-shielded mobile electron linear accelerator has made this treatment modality accessible to institutions that otherwise would not consider performing IORT. This article describes IORT equipment and supplies and addresses perioperative nursing issues, as well as the roles of other team members involved in the delivery of IORT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A S Beddar
- Case Western Reserve University, University Hospitals of Cleveland, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|