A Comparison of US, UK, and Dutch Perioperative Staffing Practices

Vulnerability in perioperative patients: a qualitative study

The study aimed to explore perioperative practitioners' knowledge, awareness and experiences of perioperative vulnerability in clinical practice. A qualitative descriptive design was used; data was obtained by conducting semi-structured interviews with ten perioperative practitioners over a two week period in July 2014. The study found that perioperative practitioners were aware of the concept of perioperative vulnerability and had varied experience of it in practice. Data analysis identified three main themes in relation to vulnerability: labels, recognition and management. We conclude that the concept of perioperative vulnerability exists in practice and that perioperative practitioners manage the concept effectively using strategies that promote positive outcomes.

An exploration of Operating Department Practice students' experiences of placement support during their first perioperative clinical placement

BACKGROUND

National and International research shows student anxiety and stress levels are high during times of clinical practice, especially during initial placement allocations. Current literature stresses the importance of preparing students for clinical placements but it is not clear what information students require to adequately prepare them. This study explored Operating Department Practice students' experiences during their first placement.

METHODS

A focus group approach was used to explore the experiences of Operating Department Practice students immediately following their first clinical placements. Following pilot study work a small focus group study was conducted. Data were analysed thematically providing a large amount of in-depth rich data.

FINDINGS

Three main themes were identified; information, placement and learning experience. Students highlighted inconsistencies in their mentoring, exacerbated by inaccurate information provided by the university. Students felt confused as a result.

CONCLUSION

It was found important for students to feel welcomed and supported by the mentoring processes in order to foster a sense of belonging. Information given by the university should be accurate and effective. This can only be achieved by closer collaboration between the university and practice providers.

Perioperative nursing in public university hospitals: an ethnography

BACKGROUND

In recent years, perioperative nursing has received ongoing attention as part of an interprofessional collaboration. Perioperative nursing is constantly faced with new challenges and opportunities that necessitate continual updates of nursing knowledge and technical skills. In light of the longstanding relationship between nursing and technology, it is interesting that few studies with this focus have been performed. Therefore, our research question was: What is the content of perioperative nursing and how do nurses facilitate the interaction between nursing care and technology in highly specialized operating rooms in public university hospitals?

METHODS

An ethnography involving participant observations and interviews was conducted during a 9-month study period. The participants comprised 24 nurses from 9 different operating wards at 2 university hospitals in different regions of Denmark.

RESULTS

Patients were addressed as either human beings or objects. Likewise, the participants' technical skills were observed and described as either technical flair or a lack of technical skills/technophobia. The different ways in which the technical skills were handled and the different ways in which the patients were viewed contributed to the development of three levels of interaction between technology and nursing care: the interaction, declining interaction, and failing interaction levels.

CONCLUSION

Nursing practice at the interaction level is characterized by flexibility and excellence, while practice at the declining interaction level is characterized by inflexibility and rigidity. Nursing practice at the failing interaction level is characterized by staff members working in isolation with limited collaboration with other staff members in operating rooms. Considering that the declining and failing interaction levels are characterized by inflexibility, rigidity, and isolation in nursing practice, nurses at these two levels must develop and improve their qualifications to reach a level of flexible, excellent interaction. Nurse leaders must therefore refocus their skills on proficiency in perioperative nursing.

Vulnerability in the perioperative patient: a concept analysis

This study aims to report the analysis of the concept of perioperative vulnerability. Literature searches were conducted in databases CINAHL, Medline, PsychINFO, OVID, InterNurse, as well as a manual library search from article reference lists. Search terms were restricted to 'concept analysis', 'vulnerability', 'perioperative', 'patient' and 'perioperative patient'. Retrieved literature was analysed using the Walker & Advant (2005) concept analysis framework. Based on the concept analysis, vulnerability can be seen as having both physical and psychological elements and can be influenced by personal traits. Vulnerability is affected by previous experiences, perceptions of life, disease and ultimately the level of control an individual has over a given situation. The study concludes that inclusion of the concept of vulnerability within both pre- and post-registration training programmes would facilitate awareness of the issues surrounding perioperative vulnerability and the need to plan individualised care accordingly. It is hoped that this analysis will inspire further research and theoretical underpinning of perioperative practice, facilitating the development of new ways to manage vulnerability that will benefit individual patients, develop practice and promote positive patient outcomes.

Perception of patient safety differs by clinical area and discipline

BACKGROUND

Current thinking about patient safety emphasizes the relationship between organizational factors, that is, latent risk factors (LRFs) and patient safety. This study explores the influence of the operating theatre (OT), intensive care unit (ICU), and disciplines on ratings of LRFs. If we have an understanding of the contribution made by these factors, we can identify significant points from which we can promote a safe environment.

METHODS

Staff in four university hospitals were sent a survey relating to the state of LRFs, which included communication, planning and coordination, design, maintenance, equipment, teamwork, team instructions, housekeeping, situational awareness, hierarchy, and procedures.

RESULTS

The ICU staff had more favourable perceptions of training, communication, team instruction, and hierarchy. The OT staff had more favourable perceptions of technical LRFs. We found three profiles for disciplines: (i) anaesthetists and intensivists had more favourable perceptions of technical LRFs than surgeons and nurses. (ii) Anaesthetists, anaesthesia nurse-technicians, and recovery nurses had a poorer perception of non-technical skills. (iii) Anaesthesia nurse-technicians and recovery nurses had less favourable perceptions of procedures, housekeeping, and situational awareness than anaesthetists and intensivists.

CONCLUSIONS

As healthcare focuses its safety efforts towards system issues rather than towards the individual provider of care, attention has turned to organizational factors, known as LRFs. Understanding how LRFs affect safety should enable us to design more effective measures that will improve overall safety. Strategies for improving patient safety should be tailored specifically for various clinical areas and disciplines.

Patient safety in the operating room: an intervention study on latent risk factors

BACKGROUND

Patient safety is one of the greatest challenges in healthcare. In the operating room errors are frequent and often consequential. This article describes an approach to a successful implementation of a patient safety program in the operating room, focussing on latent risk factors that influence patient safety. We performed an intervention to improve these latent risk factors (LRFs) and increase awareness of patient safety issues amongst OR staff.

METHODS

Latent risk factors were studied using a validated questionnaire applied to the OR staff before and after an intervention. A pre-test/post-test control group design with repeated measures was used to evaluate the effects of the interventions. The staff from one operating room of an university hospital acted as the intervention group. Controls consisted of the staff of the operating room in another university hospital. The outcomes were the changes in LRF scores, perceived incident rate, and changes in incident reports between pre- and post-intervention.

RESULTS

Based on pre-test scores and participants' key concerns about organizational factors affecting patient safety in their department the intervention focused on the following LRFs: Material Resources, Training and Staffing Recourses. After the intervention, the intervention operating room - compared to the control operating room - reported significantly fewer problems on Material Resources and Staffing Resources and a significantly lower score on perceived incident rate. The contribution of technical factors to incident causation decreased significantly in the intervention group after the intervention.

CONCLUSION

The change of state of latent risk factors can be measured using a patient safety questionnaire aimed at these factors. The change of the relevant risk factors (Material and Staffing resources) concurred with a decrease in perceived and reported incident rates in the relevant categories. We conclude that interventions aimed at unfavourable latent risk factors detected by a questionnaire focussed at these factors may contribute to the improvement of patient safety in the OR.