Dacriocistorrinostomía endoscópica endonasal frente a transcanalicular con láser diodo. Técnicas quirúrgicas y resultados

Retrospective study of success rate and associated factors of two laser dacryocystorhinostomy techniques, in a third-level hospital

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

To compare the success rate of two laser dacryocystorhinostomy (L-DCR) techniques.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective study of patients who underwent surgery for acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction (NLDO) between 2000 and 2021, carried out in a third level hospital, using L-DCR and modifications of this technique. Intraoperative findings, complications, and anatomical and functional success rate of the 2 techniques were analyzed. The follow-up time was 1 year.

RESULTS

We included 92 lacrimal ducts with NLDO. 66 (71.7%) were women. 78 (84.8%) underwent unilateral surgery. The mean age was 62.77 ± 13.08 years. 61 (66.3%) underwent intraoperative laser dacryocystorhinostomy with MMTC (L-DCR + MMTC) and 31 (33.6%) L-DCR associated with endoscopic ostium enlargement (L-DCRend-amp). The one-year anatomical/functional success rate of the L-DCRend-amp + MMTC was 71%/64,5%. L-DCR + MMTC obtained a lower success rate, 65.6/60,7% (p = 0.391). There were no differences throughout the follow-up between the anatomical or functional success rates of the 2 techniques, nor between the different visits (p > 0,05). Intraoperative findings rate was 3.63% in L-DCR + MMTC, and 32.26% in L-DCRend-amp + MMTC. Postoperative complication rate was 3.27% in L-DCR + MMTC, and 3.23% in L-DCRend-amp + MMTC.

CONCLUSIONS

The L-DCRend-amp + MMTC gets a higher success rate than the L-DCR + MMTC. We must consider the surgical time-cost of the L-DCRend-amp + MMTC, as well as the learning curve of endoscopy techniques, and the skill of the surgeon, without a clear benefit in the success rate.

Endocanalicular Laser Dacryocystorhinostomy and its modifications: A systematic review of techniques and success rates

OBJECTIVE

the main objective of this work is to review the articles that refer to transcanalicular diode laser dacryocystorhinostomy (TCL-DCR) in acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction (NLDO), as well as its modifications.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A systematic review of publications related to TCL-DCR of the lacrimal duct from 2000 to March 2021 was carried out in the MEDLINE, EMBASE and COCHRANE LIBRARY databases. The search terms in Spanish and English were: «Endocanalicular laser», dacryocystorhinostomy or «primary DCR-L» or «laser» and «tear ducts».

RESULTS

After subjecting the articles to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, we got 49 articles: 21 retrospective and 28 prospective studies. The bibliometric result obtained guaranteed, for this review, a level C recommendation according to the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network scale.

CONCLUSIONS

Currently, the classic TCL-DCR has lower success rates than its modifications, so we suggest using the latter. We prefer TCL-DCR with IS-MMC or TCDL associated with endoscopy techniques, without being able to opt for any option, since their success rates are very similar. We leave the choice to the discretion of the surgeon, depending on the management skills of endonasal techniques. More studies, with longer follow-up, and better defined criteria are necessary to clarify which is the best TCL-DCR technique.

Transcanalicular laser-assisted dacryocystorhinostomy with diode laser

This article compares the efficacy of transcanalicular laser assisted dacryocystorhinostomy (TL DCR) with conventional external dacryocystorhinostomy (Ex DCR). All patients were randomly divided into two groups - Group A included patients who underwent TL DCR and Group B included patients who underwent Ex DCR. 168 operations were done in a total of 163 patients; 79 patients in group A and 84 patients in group B. The overall success rate was 90.12% in group A and 95.40% in group B. The mean total surgical time was 17.41 min in group A and 49.49 min in group B. The duration of stay in hospital was about 3 hours for group A and about 48 hours for group B. Intra and post operative complications were more in group B than in group A. TL DCR can offer a minimally invasive technique with comparable results and better patient satisfaction than Ex DCR.

Our experience with transcanalicular laser-assisted endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy (TCLADCR) in patients of chronic dacryocystitis with deviated nasal septum

The purpose of this study is to study the operative difficulties and success rate of transcanalicular laser-assisted endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy in patients of chronic dacryocystitis with deviated nasal septum (DNS). A prospective interventional clinical study of 36 consecutive patients suffering from chronic dacryocystitis with nasolacrimal duct obstruction with DNS undergoing primary TCLADCR from March to June 2011 was carried out. Diode laser was used to create a 16-mm(2) ostium which was enlarged to 64 mm(2) using Blakesley's forceps. Success was defined as anatomical patency and absence of symptoms at 12 months of follow-up. Out of the 36 patients, 25 were females with ages 20-72 years, and 19 were left sided. There were 12 high, 12 mid and 12 basal DNS towards the side of surgery, mild to moderate in severity. Intraoperatively there was difficulty in visualising the aiming beam in the nose, tedious manipulation of endoscope and excessive bleeding in 3 patients. Increased bleeding and failures were significantly higher in high DNS (Fisher exact test-2 tailed: 0.0045). The procedure was successful in 94.4 % cases with average ostium size of 21.94 mm(2) at 12 months and no statistically significant difference in success rates between mild and moderate DNS (Fisher exact test-2 tailed: 1.000). Also there was no difference in the complication rate between mild and moderate DNS (Fisher exact test-2 tailed: 0.0841). TCLADCR is an effective procedure in patients with mild to moderate mid and basal DNS and obviates the need for multiple procedures and a cutaneous scar.