Análisis de los motivos de consulta y de su coste en la asistencia dermatológica en un centro de Atención Primaria

Prevalence of dermatoses in patients referred for evaluation in an outpatient clinic of specialties

BACKGROUND

Brazilian Unified Health System presents a long waiting period for a dermatology appointment, varying from 34 to 239 days.

OBJECTIVES

Analyze the prevalence of cutaneous diseases evaluated by dermatologists in a specialized center, in patients referred from the primary care, and to present possible interventions for the primary units.

METHODS

Retrospective analyses of the International Codes of Diseases (ICD-10) described in every dermatology appointment in a specialty center in Sao Paulo from January 2014 to August 2015.

RESULTS

A total of 7.350 consultations were included. Superficial mycosis corresponded to 1,058 (14.4%) of the main complaints and dermatophytosis was the most frequently used ICD, corresponding to 481 individual consultations (6.5%), followed by onychomycosis, responsible for 464 consultations (6.3%), acne in 347 (4,7%). and contact dermatitis in 311 consultations (4,2%).

STUDY LIMITATIONS

The study was based on retrospective analysis of ICD described and no previous orientation for a solid use of the codes was performed to the dermatology team; consultations in which the ICD was not informed or a non-especific ICD was used were excluded; different dermatologists were responsible for the consultations.

CONCLUSION

Superficial mycosis corresponded to 14.4% of the chief complaints in the studied period and was the most frequent cause of reference from primary care doctors to dermatologists. Prevalence data obtained in the present study could assist the capacitation policies in the primary care system, focusing the dermatology teaching in the most prevalent dermatological disorders.

Dermatologic emergencies in a tertiary hospital: A descriptive study

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Dermatology in-house call is uncommon in the Spanish national health system. The objective of the present study was to define the groups of dermatologic diseases and conditions most frequently seen in the emergency department and to evaluate the need for dermatology in-house call in the training of medical residents.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We performed a descriptive study of all patients who attended the emergency department with a skin complaint during a 1-year period (June 2013 to May 2014) and were assessed by 9 dermatology residents. The study variables were date/day, sex, age, diagnosis, special surgical procedures, additional laboratory tests, and need for hospitalization and/or follow-up. We also evaluated patients attending their first scheduled visit to the dermatologist between January and June 2014 in order to compare the most frequent conditions in both groups.

RESULTS

A total of 3084 patients attended the emergency room with a skin complaint (5.6% of all visits to the emergency department), and 152 different diagnoses were made. The most frequent groups of diseases were infectious diseases (23%) and eczema (15.1%). The specific conditions seen were acute urticaria (7.6%), contact dermatitis (6.1%), and drug-induced reactions (4.6%). By contrast, the most frequent conditions seen in the 1288 patients who attended a scheduled dermatology appointment were seborrheic keratosis (11.9%), melanocytic nevus (11.5%), and actinic keratosis (8%). A follow-up visit was required in 42% of patients seen in the emergency department. Fourth-year residents generated the lowest number of follow-up visits.

CONCLUSIONS

We found that infectious diseases and eczema accounted for almost 40% of all emergency dermatology visits. Our results seem to indicate that the system of in-house call for dermatology residents is very useful for the hospital system and an essential component of the dermatology resident's training program.

Process of Care for Patients With Benign Cysts and Tumors: Consensus Document of the Andalusian Regional Section of the Spanish Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (AEDV)

Benign skin lesions are a common reason for visits to primary care physicians and dermatologists. However, access to diagnosis and treatment for these lesions varies considerably between users, primarily because no explicit or standardized criteria for dealing with these patients have been defined. Principally with a view to reducing this variability in the care of patients with benign cysts or tumors, the Andalusian Regional Section of the Spanish Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (AEDV) has created a Process of Care document that describes a clinical pathway and quality-of-care characteristics for each action. This report also makes recommendations for decision-making with respect to lesions of this type.

Skin conditions in primary care: an analysis of referral demand

INTRODUCTION

Skin conditions are among the main reasons for seeking primary health care. Primary care physicians (PCPs) must diagnose skin conditions and determine their impact, and must therefore incorporate the relevant knowledge and skills into their education. The present study analyzes the reasons for primary care referral to dermatology (referral demand) as well as diagnostic agreement between PCPs and dermatologists informed by pathology where appropriate.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Data were collected for 755 patients and 882 initial dermatology appointments from February 1, 2012 through April 30, 2012 following primary care referral. Data obtained included age, sex, occupation, reason for referral, primary care diagnosis, and dermatologic diagnosis. Statistical analysis of the data for each diagnosed condition identified frequency, reasons for referral, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and the κ statistic for diagnostic agreement.

RESULTS

The most common diagnoses were seborrheic keratosis, melanocytic nevus, actinic keratosis, and acne. The main reason for referral was diagnostic assessment (52.5%). For skin tumors, sensitivity of primary care diagnosis was 22.4%, specificity 94.7%, PPV 40.7%, and NPV 88.3%, with a κ of 0.211. For the more common diagnoses, primary care sensitivity was generally low and specificity high.

CONCLUSIONS

According to our results, primary care physicians are better qualified to rule out a given skin condition in a patient (high specificity) than to establish an accurate clinical diagnosis (poor sensitivity). This suggests that knowledge and skills training should be organized for primary care physicians to improve management of skin conditions-especially skin cancer, because of its impact. A more responsive system would ensue, with shorter waiting lists and better health care.

[Referrals to dermatology: proportion of banal disorders]

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Skin diseases account for a large number of consultations in primary care. The objective of this study was to determine the characteristics and cost of referrals from primary care to a dermatology clinic.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Descriptive cross-sectional study of referrals from a primary care health center to a dermatology clinic. The dermatology clinic was situated in the same health center and was attended by a dermatologist from Complejo Hospitalario Universitario in Albacete, Spain. The study was performed on 10 days selected at random between April 21, 2009, and June 26, 2009. The data gathered included age, sex, use of cryotherapy, and diagnostic group. Patients were divided into 4 diagnostic groups: A) benign degenerative disease or trivial disorders whose treatment may not merit involvement of the national health service, B) diseases resolved with a single dermatology consultation at the health center, C) diseases requiring evaluation in hospital-based dermatology outpatients, and D) diseases referred for surgical treatment.

RESULTS

Data were gathered on 257 patients with a mean age was 41.18 years and there was a slight female predominance. The majority of patients were in diagnostic group B (53.7%), followed by groups A (19.1%), C (19.1%), and D (8.2%). The total estimated cost of these 257 visits was €29 750.32, of which €5672.24 was for trivial disorders.

CONCLUSIONS

The current high prevalence of trivial disorders in the caseload of dermatology clinics by trivial disorders makes it necessary to control referrals from primary care more strictly.

[Diagnostic reliability of an asynchronous teledermatology consultation]

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the diagnostic agreement rate between primary care, an asynchronous teledermatology consultation, and a conventional dermatology consultation.

DESIGN

Prospective non-randomized concordance study.

SETTING

Dermatology Service in Hospital Son Llàtzer (Palma de Mallorca) and primary care centers of Sóller and Arenal (Mallorca).

PARTICIPANTS

Patients have been included from December 2005 to July 2008, sent by teleconsultation (n=158).

MAIN MEASUREMENTS

Analysis of primary care, teledermatology consultation and face-to-face consultation diagnosis, in mentioned period of time. Calculation of kappa index of concordance.

RESULTS

158 teleconsultations have been made from December 2005 to July 2008, 94 (59,5%) women, and 64 (40,5%) men, aged from 9 to 96 years old (average, 55 years old). After grouping the diagnosis in categories, the distribution was: 48 (37,2%) benign tumours, 39 (30,2%) inflammatory and appendages diseases, 15 (11,6%) infectious diseases, 14 (10,9%) malignant tumours, and 13 (10,1%) premalignant tumours. In grouped diagnosis, concordance was 59,8% (CI 95%, 50-70%) (P<.0001) for general practitioner and 94,7% (CI 95%, 90-99%) (P<.0001) for teledermatologist.

CONCLUSIONS

The main advantage of asynchronous teledermatology is the improvement of the quality triage, allowing the detection of malignant or suspicious lesions. However, we need more comparable studies on a larger scale to evaluate the disadvantages (photographic technique limitation, evaluation of other lesions, legal aspects, professional motivation...).