beta-blocker improvement in diastolic performance: the yin and yang of ventricular function changes

Heart failure with preserved systolic function: giving well-deserved attention to the "other" heart failure

Heart failure with preserved systolic function is common in patients hospitalized with decompensated heart failure and is associated with postdischarge morbidity and costs similar to patients with heart failure and systolic dysfunction. It is common in the older people, and hypertension and cardiac ischemia are often etiological factors. Nurses must be able to recognize left ventricular diastolic abnormalities and understand treatment priorities and treatment options on the basis of structural cardiovascular disease; etiology and risk factors; and signs, symptoms, and hemodynamic parameters. Currently, clinical treatments are on the basis of individual randomized clinical trials; however, there are general principles that should be followed during hospitalization and as part of general practice. As in the treatment of systolic heart failure, nurses have active roles in ensuring accurate assessment; optimal care planning; implementation of clinical, psychosocial; and education interventions; and timely and accurate evaluation so that patients have the best chance for successful hospital and postdischarge outcomes.

Left ventricular diastolic function improvement by carvedilol therapy in advanced heart failure

Carvedilol treatment in chronic heart failure (CHF) patients has been demonstrated to reduce mortality by improving cardiac systolic function and reducing left ventricular adverse remodeling. However, the effects of the drug on left ventricular (LV) filling are less studied. In this study we evaluated early and long-term diastolic cardiac modifications by an echo-Doppler method during carvedilol therapy in patients with advanced CHF and pseudonormal or restrictive filling pattern. We studied 58 patients with severe but stable CHF (39 in class NYHA III and 19 in IV) having systolic and diastolic dysfunction caused by idiopathic or ischemic cardiomyopathy. Thirty-two patients were randomized to receive previous treatment plus carvedilol (group 1) and 26 continued standard therapy (group 2). In all subjects we evaluated LV volumes, LV mass, LV ejection fraction (EF), and the following transmitral filling parameters: early wave (E), atrial wave (A), E/A ratio, deceleration time (DT), and isovolumetric releasing time (IVRT). After 4 months of therapy, the carvedilol group showed a significant increase of A wave (P < 0.001), DT (P < 0.0001), IVRT (P < 0.0001), and a significant reduction of E/A ratio (P < 0.0005) with respect to group 2. Further improvement was observed at 12 months (A P < 0.0005; DT P < 0.00002; IVRT P < 0.000004; E/A P < 0.0008), although an E wave reduction was observed in group 1 with respect to controls (P < 0.001). Moreover, after 1 year of follow-up a reduction of systolic volume (P < 0.001) and pulmonary pressure (P < 0.0001) and consequent increase of EF (P < 0.001) was observed in the carvedilol group. Carvedilol treatment improved diastolic function in CHF with severe diastolic and systolic impairment at early time, converting a restrictive or pseudonormal filling pattern into an altered pattern. These changes remained significant after 1 year of therapy together with improvement in systolic function.

Bisoprolol Improves Echocardiographic Parameters of Left Ventricular Diastolic Function in Patients with Systemic Hypertension

Left ventricular (LV) diastolic dysfunction (LVD) is a common complication secondary to hypertension. It has been reported that bisoprolol is effective in reducing blood pressure and has beneficial cardiac effects in patients with hypertension. However, its effect on LV diastolic function has not been studied in detail. In this study, we sought to determine bisoprolol's effect on left ventricle diastolic function. Data from 25 patients were statistically analyzed. Peaks E and A wave, E/A ratio, isovolumetric relaxation time and E wave deceleration time were measured echocardiographically. Doppler echocardiography measurements after bisoprolol treatment revealed an improvement in LV diastolic function. In conclusion, our results show that treatment with bisoprolol, improves echocardiographic parameters of LV diastolic function after 3 months of treatment.

Metoprolol CR/XL Improves Systolic and Diastolic Left Ventricular Function in Patients with Chronic Heart Failure

AIMS

To investigate whether metoprolol controlled release/extended release (CR/XL) once daily would improve diastolic and systolic left ventricular function in patients with chronic heart failure and decreased ejection fraction.

METHODS

In an echocardiographic substudy to the Metoprolol CR/XL Randomized Intervention Trial in Heart Failure (MERIT-HF), 66 patients were examined three times during a 12-month period blinded to treatment group, assessing left ventricular dimensions and ejection fraction, and Doppler mitral inflow parameters, all measured in a core laboratory.

RESULTS

In the metoprolol CR/XL group left ventricular ejection fraction increased from 0.26 to 0.31 (P = 0.009) after a mean observation period of 10.6 months, and deceleration time of the early mitral filling wave (E) increased from 189 to 246 ms (P = 0.0012), time velocity integral of E-wave increased from 8.7 to 11.2 cm (P = 0.018), and the duration of the late mitral filling wave (A) increased from 122 to 145 ms (P = 0.014). No significant changes were seen in the placebo group regarding any of these variables.

CONCLUSION

Metoprolol CR/XL once daily in addition to standard therapy improved both diastolic and systolic function in patients with chronic heart failure and decreased ejection fraction.

Relation between heart rate, heart rhythm, and reverse left ventricular remodelling in response to carvedilol in patients with chronic heart failure: a single centre, observational study

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether the process of reverse left ventricular remodelling in response to carvedilol is dependent on baseline heart rate (BHR), heart rhythm, or heart rate reduction (HRR) in response to carvedilol.

DESIGN

Retrospective analysis of serial echocardiograms in 257 patients with chronic systolic heart failure at baseline and at 12-18 months after starting carvedilol. Reverse left ventricular remodelling was determined by changes in left ventricular end diastolic dimension (LVEDD), end systolic dimension (LVESD), and fractional shortening (LVFS).

SETTING

Heart failure clinic within a university teaching hospital.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Changes in LVEDD, LVESD, and LVFS.

RESULTS

LVEDD and LVESD decreased by 2.6 (0.4) mm and 4.9 (0.5) mm, respectively (mean (SEM)), and LVFS increased by 4.3 (0.5)% (all p < 0.0001 v baseline). Simple regression revealed no significant relation between BHR or HRR and the changes in LVEDD, LVESD, or LVFS. Stratification of patients into high and low BHR groups (above and below the mean) or according to the baseline heart rhythm (sinus rhythm v atrial fibrillation) showed no differences between groups in the extent of reverse left ventricular remodelling. Improvements in left ventricular function and dimensions were associated with significant improvements in New York Heart Association functional class.

CONCLUSIONS

The benefits of carvedilol in terms of reverse left ventricular remodelling and symptomatic improvement in patients with chronic heart failure are independent of BHR, heart rhythm, and the HRR that occurs in response to carvedilol.