Worldwide evaluation of a defibrillation lead with a small geometric electrode surface for high-impedance pacing

A systematic review of ICD complications in randomised controlled trials versus registries: is our 'real-world' data an underestimation?

Implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) implantation carries a significant risk of complications, however published estimates appear inconsistent. We aimed to present a contemporary systematic review using meta-analysis methods of ICD complications in randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and compare it to recent data from the largest international ICD registry, the US National Cardiovascular Data Registry (NCDR).

PubMed was searched for any RCTs involving ICD implantation published 1999–2013; 18 were identified for analysis including 6433 patients, mean follow-up 3 months–5.6 years. Exclusion criteria were studies of children, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, congenital heart disease, resynchronisation therapy and generator changes.

Total pooled complication rate from the RCTs (excluding inappropriate shocks) was 9.1%, including displacement 3.1%, pneumothorax 1.1% and haematoma 1.2%. Infection rate was 1.5%.There were no predictors of complications but longer follow-up showed a trend to higher complication rates (p=0.07). In contrast, data from the NCDR ICD, reporting on 356 515 implants (2006–2010) showed a statistically significant threefold lower total major complication rate of 3.08% with lead displacement 1.02%, haematoma 0.86% and pneumothorax 0.44%.

The overall ICD complication rate in our meta-analysis is 9.1% over 16 months. The ICD complication reported in the NCDR ICD registry is significantly lower despite a similar population. This may reflect under-reporting of complications in registries. Reporting of ICD complications in RCTs and registries is very variable and there is a need to standardise classification of complications internationally.

Automatic Impedance Monitoring and Patient Alert Feature in Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators:

Recent advances in implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) technology have enabled implementation of an automatic monitoring feature in ICDs that provides daily measurements of several technical parameters such as battery status, pacing, and high-voltage impedance. The system alerts the patient with an audible alarm to contact the physician in case the measured parameters are not within normal limits. Early detection of intermittent and potentially serious complications justifies routine use of this feature. This report describes a patient with an ICD who died suddenly due to ventricular fibrillation, which was not appropriately treated by the device. The cause of device malfunction was most likely an intermittent lead fracture that was not detected by the automatic impedance monitoring and alert feature of this device. Based on these data, potential benefits and theoretical pitfalls of automatic impedance monitoring and alert features are discussed.

Long‐Term Performance of Transvenous, Steroid‐Eluting, High Impedance, Passive‐Fixation Ventricular Pacing Leads

The long-term performance of two high impedance, steroid-eluting, passive-fixation ventricular leads, porous platinum iridium electrode CPI Selute Picotip 4035 (131 patients), and platinized platinum electrode Medtronic Capsure Z 5034 (57 patients), was compared with one conventional 8.0-mm2 porous platinum iridium electrode CPI Selute 4285 (38 patients). The mean follow-up period was 28 +/- 14 months. Capture threshold, R wave amplitude, and pacing impedance were measured at the time of implantation, immediately after implantation, 1 week, 1, 3, and 6 months after implantation and then every 6 months thereafter. The two high impedance leads revealed a higher sensing slew rate than the conventional lead, the R wave amplitude was similar among the three groups, but the voltage threshold at 0.5-ms pulse width was significantly higher in porous platinum iridium groups at the time of implantation. During follow-up, the conventional lead revealed a significantly higher R wave amplitude within the first 3 months, however, this pattern disappeared after 3 months. Pacing impedance was significantly higher in the high impedance porous platinum iridium electrode groups. Voltage threshold at 0.5-ms pulse width was similar among the three groups in the first 3 months, however, it increased gradually and was significantly higher in porous platinum iridium electrode groups subsequently. The energy threshold at 0.5 ms was significantly lower in the two high impedance groups than the conventional group, but no difference was found in the two high impedance groups. Lead related complications were similar among the three groups. In conclusion, high impedance electrodes with different design and materials had different properties; platinized platinum electrode showed a lower pacing impedance but had a more stable long-term capture threshold as compared to the porous platinum iridium electrode. Further studies are mandatory for the development of an ideal pacing lead.