1
|
Qiao Y, Anwar Z, Intrapiromkul J, Liu L, Zeiler SR, Leigh R, Zhang Y, Guallar E, Wasserman BA. Patterns and Implications of Intracranial Arterial Remodeling in Stroke Patients. Stroke 2016; 47:434-40. [PMID: 26742795 DOI: 10.1161/strokeaha.115.009955] [Citation(s) in RCA: 133] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2015] [Accepted: 11/30/2015] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Preliminary studies suggest that intracranial arteries are capable of accommodating plaque formation by remodeling. We sought to study the ability and extent of intracranial arteries to remodel using 3-dimensional high-resolution black blood magnetic resonance imaging and investigate its relation to ischemic events. METHODS Forty-two patients with cerebrovascular ischemic events underwent 3-dimensional time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography and contrast-enhanced black blood magnetic resonance imaging examinations at 3 T for intracranial atherosclerotic disease. Each plaque was classified by location (eg, posterior versus anterior circulation) and its likelihood to have caused a stroke identified on magnetic resonance imaging (culprit, indeterminate, or nonculprit). Lumen area, outer wall area, and wall area were measured at the lesion and reference sites. Plaque burden was calculated as wall area divided by outer wall area. The arterial remodeling ratio (RR) was calculated as outer wall area at the lesion site divided by outer wall area at the reference site after adjusting for vessel tapering. Arterial remodeling was categorized as positive if RR>1.05, intermediate if 0.95≤RR≤1.05, and negative if RR<0.95. RESULTS One hundred and thirty-seven plaques were identified in 42 patients (37% [50] posterior and 63% [87] anterior). Compared with anterior circulation plaques, posterior circulation plaques had a larger plaque burden (77.7±15.7 versus 69.0±14.0; P=0.008), higher RR (1.14±0.38 versus 0.95±0.32; P=0.002), and more often exhibited positive remodeling (54.0% versus29.9%; P=0.011). Positive remodeling was marginally associated with downstream stroke presence when adjusted for plaque burden (odds ratio 1.34, 95% confidence interval: 0.99-1.81). CONCLUSIONS Intracranial arteries remodel in response to plaque formation, and posterior circulation arteries have a greater capacity for positive remodeling and, consequently, may more likely elude angiographic detection. Arterial remodeling may provide insight into stroke risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ye Qiao
- From The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD (Y.Q., Z.A., J.I., L.L., B.A.W.); Department of Neurology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD (S.R.Z., R.L.); and Department of Epidemiology, The Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD (Y.Z., E.G.)
| | - Zeeshan Anwar
- From The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD (Y.Q., Z.A., J.I., L.L., B.A.W.); Department of Neurology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD (S.R.Z., R.L.); and Department of Epidemiology, The Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD (Y.Z., E.G.)
| | - Jarunee Intrapiromkul
- From The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD (Y.Q., Z.A., J.I., L.L., B.A.W.); Department of Neurology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD (S.R.Z., R.L.); and Department of Epidemiology, The Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD (Y.Z., E.G.)
| | - Li Liu
- From The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD (Y.Q., Z.A., J.I., L.L., B.A.W.); Department of Neurology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD (S.R.Z., R.L.); and Department of Epidemiology, The Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD (Y.Z., E.G.)
| | - Steven R Zeiler
- From The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD (Y.Q., Z.A., J.I., L.L., B.A.W.); Department of Neurology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD (S.R.Z., R.L.); and Department of Epidemiology, The Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD (Y.Z., E.G.)
| | - Richard Leigh
- From The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD (Y.Q., Z.A., J.I., L.L., B.A.W.); Department of Neurology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD (S.R.Z., R.L.); and Department of Epidemiology, The Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD (Y.Z., E.G.)
| | - Yiyi Zhang
- From The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD (Y.Q., Z.A., J.I., L.L., B.A.W.); Department of Neurology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD (S.R.Z., R.L.); and Department of Epidemiology, The Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD (Y.Z., E.G.)
| | - Eliseo Guallar
- From The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD (Y.Q., Z.A., J.I., L.L., B.A.W.); Department of Neurology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD (S.R.Z., R.L.); and Department of Epidemiology, The Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD (Y.Z., E.G.)
| | - Bruce A Wasserman
- From The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD (Y.Q., Z.A., J.I., L.L., B.A.W.); Department of Neurology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD (S.R.Z., R.L.); and Department of Epidemiology, The Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD (Y.Z., E.G.).
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Abstract
Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) has a defined role in the cardiac catheterization laboratory to assess lesion severity and the procedural success of vascular interventions. However, IVUS has also contributed to our understanding of the biology of atherosclerosis and restenosis. In acute coronary syndromes, IVUS has revealed varying degrees of stenosis, thrombosis, and plaque derangement typical of the plaque disruption seen in many pathologic studies of patients who have died of this condition. IVUS has demonstrated that the culprit lesions of patients surviving acute coronary syndromes also tend to be softer, with less calcium, and tend to have more plaque with positive arterial remodeling (compensatory enlargement) than lesions causing stable coronary syndromes. Arterial remodeling is also an important component of restenosis after coronary interventions. IVUS has suggested that interventions that reduce restenosis tend to have a greater impact on preventing negative remodeling (constriction) rather than reducing neointimal proliferation. Oxidant stress may be an important contributor to negative remodeling, as IVUS has demonstrated this anatomy at sites of coronary artery spasm. Positive remodeling seen by IVUS is also associated with impaired endothelial vasomotor dysfunction, and IVUS studies have demonstrated the contribution of vasomotor tone to arterial elasticity. Future directions include integrating IVUS with other imaging modalities, such as angiography, to study the interaction of anatomic and physiologic factors in atherosclerosis progression, and using the raw ultrasound signal to distinguish plaque components and differences in wall strain that may identify vulnerable plaques.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Kinlay
- Intravascular Ultrasound, Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Gyongyosi M, Yang P, Hassan A, Domanovits H, Laggner A, Weidinger F, Glogar D. Intravascular ultrasound predictors of major adverse cardiac events in patients with unstable angina. Clin Cardiol 2000; 23:507-15. [PMID: 10894439 PMCID: PMC6654996 DOI: 10.1002/clc.4960230709] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/1999] [Accepted: 10/01/1999] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) predictors of native culprit lesion morphology for occurrence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) have not been reported. Moreover, the published data on IVUS predictors of restenosis include patients with stable and unstable angina, although the development and progression of atherosclerosis related to unstable coronary syndrome is different from that of stable angina. HYPOTHESIS This study investigated whether IVUS-derived qualitative and quantitative parameters of native (preangioplastic) plaque morphologic features can predict major adverse cardiac events in patients with unstable angina. METHODS Clinical (age, gender, coronary risk factors), qualitative and quantitative angiographic (lesion localization, morphology, pre- and postangioplastic minimal lumen diameter, reference diameter, and percent diameter stenosis), and IVUS variables (soft/fibrocalcific plaque, calcification, presence of thrombus or plaque disruption, different types of arterial remodeling, pre- or postangioplastic minimal lumen, external elastic membrane and plaque cross-sectional area, and plaque burden of the target lesion and reference segments) were analyzed by regression analyses using the Cox model, assuming proportional hazards. RESULTS Of 60 consecutively enrolled patients, 21 suffered from MACE, while 39 remained event-free during the followup period. Multivariate regression analyses revealed that the presence of adaptive remodeling [p = 0.0177, risk ratio (RR) = 3.108, with 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.371-8.289] and the preangioplastic lumen cross-sectional area (p = 0.0130, RR = 0.869, with 95% CI = 0.667-0.913) are independent predictors of MACE during follow-up, as is postangioplastic angiographic minimal lumen diameter (p = 0.0330, RR = 0.715 with 95% CI = 0.678-0.812). CONCLUSIONS Adaptive remodeling and preangioplastic lumen cross-sectional area determined by IVUS and postangioplastic minimal lumen diameter calculated by quantitative angiography are significant independent predictors of time-dependent MACE in patients with unstable angina.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Gyongyosi
- Second Department of Internal Medicine, University of Vienna, Austria
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|