Impact of routine angiographic follow-up after angioplasty

Routine Angiographic Follow-Up After Coronary Artery Disease Revascularization: Is Seeing Believing?

PURPOSE OF THE REVIEW

Coronary artery disease is a major cause of mortality and morbidity in the world, and PCI and CABG account for over a million procedures performed annually in the USA. The goal of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is to achieve complete revascularization (CR) if at all possible. However, restenosis and stent thrombosis (ST) remain the Achilles heel of contemporary PCI with restenosis rates between 10 and 30% with bare metal stents to 5-15% after drug-eluting stents and ST rates of around 0.8 vs 1.2%, respectively. Routine angiography after revascularization seems theoretically attractive as this may allow intervention before clinical events occur. In this manuscript, we review the literature regarding routine angiography after PCI or CABG and its outcomes.

RECENT FINDINGS

According to the 2016 update from the American Heart Association (AHA), 15.5 million people above the age of 20 have coronary heart disease (CHD) in the USA. The prevalence of CHD is now almost similar in both men and women, and one American suffers from a myocardial infarction (MI) every 42 s. Recent data from randomized clinical trials and observational studies does not support the use of routine coronary angiography after revascularization in asymptomatic patients. There are some studies which show that routine angiography may have a role in left main or complex coronary interventions; however, these findings are exploratory and were not seen in randomized trials. After reviewing the data on routine angiography after coronary revascularization, we came to the conclusion that current data does not support the use of routine angiography for asymptomatic patients. However, there is a lack of randomized controlled trial in this field with only one recent trial reporting negative outcomes.

The role of angiographic follow-up after percutaneous coronary intervention

In the early days of coronary angioplasty, follow-up coronary angiography was often performed to assess restenosis. Angiographic restenosis has been shown to be associated with worse clinical outcomes, though the exact causality has yet to be determined. Numerous studies have repeatedly demonstrated that routine follow-up coronary angiography increases the incidence of target lesion revascularization without a clear reduction in mortality or myocardial infarction. Despite the lack of proven benefit of angiographic follow-up, routine follow-up coronary angiography is still being performed in certain countries and facilities. There are several factors that might explain the lack of benefit of angiographic follow-up: 1) lower incidence of stent failure in the current drug-eluting stent era has attenuated the net clinical benefit of follow-up angiography. 2) Angiographic restenosis might not lead to myocardial ischemia. 3) Patients that do have functionally significant restenosis are often referred for coronary angiography due to clinical indications such as intractable angina. 4) Absence of restenosis at the time of follow-up angiography does not exclude future restenosis. The absence of proven benefit in unselected populations does not necessarily preclude the presence of benefit in selected population, and there may be a subgroup of patients who can benefit from angiographic follow-up such as those with a large myocardial ischemic territory or those at very high risk of restenosis. Until there is more clinical evidence with respect to follow-up angiography, the decision of whether or not to perform it routinely in selected high-risk population should entail an in-depth discussion with the patient.

The Impact of Routine Angiographic Follow-Up in a Population of Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Within the Left Main Coronary Artery

Prognostic value of angiographic follow-up in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs) of the left main coronary artery (LMCA) still remains uncertain. The aim of the study was to compare clinical characteristics, mortality, and major cardiovascular events in patients with versus without angiographic follow-up after PCI of the LMCA as well as to identify independent risk factors for death after PCI of the LMCA. Study population consisted of 217 patients of 290 consecutive participants who underwent PCI of the LMCA and subsequently were divided into 2 groups: angiographic follow-up group (angio FU group, n = 155) and clinical follow-up group (clinical FU group, n = 62). In angio FU group, significantly lower mortality (19.4% vs 32.3%, P < .05) and higher repeated revascularization rates (PCI: 46.5% vs 8.1%, P < .001 and coronary artery bypass grafting: 12.9% vs 1.6%, P < .05) were observed. Independent risk factors for death were as follows: metal stent implantation (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.753), no angiographic follow-up (HR: 1.959), and an increase in serum creatinine level of 1 μmol/L (HR: 1.006). These preliminary data suggest that the lack of angiographic follow-up after PCI of the LMCA may result in higher long-term mortality.

Clinical impact of routine follow-up coronary angiography after second- or third-generation drug-eluting stent insertion in clinically stable patients

BACKGROUND/AIMS

In the bare-metal stent era, routine follow-up coronary angiography (RFU CAG) was used to ensure stent patency. With the advent of drug-eluting stents (DESs) with better safety and efficacy profiles, RFU CAG has been performed less often. There are few data on the clinical impact of RFU CAG after second- or third-generation DES implantation in clinically stable patients with coronary artery disease; the aim of this study was to examine this issue.

METHODS

We analyzed clinical outcomes retrospectively of 259 patients who were event-free at 12-month after stent implantation and did not undergo RFU CAG (clinical follow-up group) and 364 patients who were event-free prior to RFU CAG (angiographic follow-up group). Baseline characteristics were compared between the groups.

RESULTS

The Kaplan-Meier estimated total survival and major adverse cardiac event (MACE)-free survival did not differ between the groups (p = 0.100 and p = 0.461, respectively). The cumulative MACE rate was also not different between the groups (hazard ratio, 0.85; 95% confidence interval, 0.35 to 2.02). In the angiographic follow-up group, 8.8% revascularization was seen at RFU CAG.

CONCLUSIONS

RFU CAG did not affect long-term clinical outcome after second- or third-generation DES implantation in clinically stable patients.

Long-term safety and efficacy of paclitaxel-eluting stents final 5-year analysis from the TAXUS Clinical Trial Program

OBJECTIVES

These studies sought to evaluate the clinical outcomes of the slow-release Taxus paclitaxel-eluting stent (PES) versus an otherwise identical bare-metal stent (BMS).

BACKGROUND

Prior studies were not individually powered to generate reliable estimates of low-frequency safety endpoints or to characterize the long-term safety and efficacy profile of PES.

METHODS

The completed 5-year databases from the prospective, randomized, double-blind TAXUS I, II, IV, and V trials were pooled for a patient-level analysis.

RESULTS

The study population comprised 2,797 randomized patients (1,400 PES and 1,397 BMS). At the end of the 5-year study period, PES compared with BMS significantly reduced the rate of ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization (12.3% vs. 21.0%, p < 0.0001), with consistent reductions across high-risk subgroups and in patients with and without routine angiographic follow-up. There were no significant differences between the stent types in the 1-year or cumulative 5-year rates of death or myocardial infarction (MI). However, cardiac death or MI between 1 and 5 years was increased with PES (6.7% vs. 4.5%, p = 0.01), as was stent thrombosis (protocol definition: 0.9% vs. 0.2%, p = 0.007; ARC definition: 1.4% vs. 0.9%, p = 0.18).

CONCLUSIONS

In this pooled patient-level analysis from the prospective, randomized, double-blind TAXUS trials, PES compared with BMS resulted in a durable 47% reduction in the 5-year rate of ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization in simple and complex lesions, with nonsignificant differences in the cumulative 5-year rates of death or MI. Between 1 and 5 years, however, the rates of cardiac death or MI and protocol-defined stent thrombosis were increased with PES.

Influence of abciximab on evolution of left ventricular function in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes undergoing PCI after clopidogrel pretreatment: lessons from the ISAR-REACT 2 trial

BACKGROUND

Abciximab reduced the combined endpoint of death, myocardial infarction (MI) and target vessel revascularization in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTE-ACS) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with stent implantation after a 600-mg loading dose of clopidogrel. The aim of the present study was to investigate the impact of abciximab on the evolution of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in these patients.

METHODS

The current study included 1,158 patients enrolled in the randomized, double-blind ISAR-REACT 2 (the Intracoronary Stenting and Antithrombotic Regimen: Rapid Early Action for Coronary Treatment) trial who had paired angiograms obtained at baseline and 6-8 months after randomization. Of them, 586 patients received abciximab and 572 patients received placebo. The primary outcome analysis was LVEF at 6-8-month follow-up.

RESULTS

Baseline LVEF was comparable in patients assigned to abciximab or placebo (53.2 ± 12.6 vs. 53.7 ± 12.1%; P = 0.393). At 6-8-month follow-up angiography, there was no difference in LVEF between the abciximab and placebo groups (55.4 ± 11.5 vs. 55.8 ± 11.2%; P = 0.743). Subgroup analysis of patients with elevated baseline troponin (>0.03 μg/L) also revealed comparable LVEF at follow-up in both treatment groups (P = 0.527). The multivariate analysis identified age, arterial hypertension, prior MI, prior coronary artery bypass graft surgery, baseline LVEF, MI at 30 days and repeat PCI as independent correlates of follow-up LVEF.

CONCLUSION

Although abciximab reduced the 30-day and 1-year incidence of major adverse cardiac events in patients with NSTE-ACS undergoing primary PCI after pre-treatment with a 600-mg loading dose of clopidogrel, the agent did not improve or impact on the evolution of LVEF over 6-8 months of follow-up.

The clinical impact of routine angiographic follow-up in randomized trials of drug-eluting stents: a critical assessment of "oculostenotic" reintervention in patients with intermediate lesions

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to study the long-term clinical effects of routine angiographic follow-up and related reintervention after drug-eluting stenting.

BACKGROUND

Prior stent trials have shown that protocol-mandated angiographic follow-up increases repeat interventions compared with clinical follow-up alone. The long-term clinical impact of this practice is unknown.

METHODS

Long-term outcomes of patients assigned to routine angiographic follow-up in 3 large-scale TAXUS (Boston Scientific, Natick, Massachusetts) trials were compared with patients assigned to clinical follow-up alone, in a propensity score-adjusted patient-level meta-analysis. Outcomes were also compared in patients with treated versus untreated nonischemic intermediate lesions (quantitative angiographic stenosis between >or=40% and <70%) detected at angiographic follow-up.

RESULTS

Target lesion revascularization (TLR) rates at 5 years were significantly higher in the angiographic compared with clinical follow-up cohort (18.3% vs. 11.1%, p < 0.001). This was due to more frequent treatment of intermediate lesions, but there was no associated reduction in rates of cardiac death or myocardial infarction (8.9% vs. 8.8%, p = 0.93). Of patients with nonischemic intermediate lesions, 17% who were not revascularized at the time of angiographic follow-up had a subsequent TLR, whereas 7% of patients who had TLR at this follow-up angiogram required additional revascularization during long-term follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

A strategy of routine angiographic follow-up increases oculostenotic revascularization of nonischemic intermediate lesions without affecting subsequent rates of cardiac death or myocardial infarction, and TLR was not required in 83% of those lesions. A conservative approach, in which repeat angiography is limited to patients with recurrent ischemia or progressive symptoms, minimizes repeat revascularization of nonischemic intermediate lesions and optimizes long-term event-free survival after drug-eluting stent implantation.

Long-term follow-up after deferring angioplasty in asymptomatic patients with moderate noncritical in-stent restenosis

BACKGROUND

Many patients with in-stent restenosis (ISR) are angina-free, but the optimal treatment for these patients remains uncertain.

HYPOTHESIS

In cases with asymptomatic moderate noncritical ISR. deferral of the intervention may be safe and associated with favorable clinical outcome.

METHODS

We evaluated the long-term clinical outcome of asymptomatic patients (Group 1, n = 98) with moderate noncritical ISR (< 70% diameter stenosis) after intervention was deferred, and compared it with that of patients (Group 2, n = 655) without restenosis. After repeat angioplasty was deferred, all patients were treated medically and later underwent angioplasty only in the case of clinical recurrence.

RESULTS

Baseline characteristics were similar between the two groups. Clinical follow-up was available in all patients at 26.3+/-15.9 months. Twenty patients died during the follow-up: 1 in Group 1 and 19 in Group 2. Target lesion revascularization was performed in 3 patients in Group 1 and 11 patients in Group 2 during follow-up (p = NS), and new lesion revascularization in 2 patients in Group 1 and 27 patients in Group 2 (p = NS). Event-free survival rate (cardiac death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, repeat revascularization) was 86.7+/-6.1% in Group 1 and 84.8+/-2.2% in Group 2 at the end of follow-up (p = NS). Major adverse cardiac events were only associated with the presence of diabetic mellitus (hazards ratio 2.65, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.48-4.73, p<0.01). The percentage of patients receiving antianginal medication was similar between the two groups at the end of the study (p = NS).

CONCLUSIONS

Asymptomatic patients with moderate noncritical ISR have a good prognosis and similar clinical outcome as those without ISR, suggesting that it may be safe to defer repeat angioplasty in these patients until angina recurrence.

The Cobalt chromium STent with Antiproliferative for Restenosis II (COSTAR II) trial study design: advancing the active-control evaluation of second-generation drug-eluting stents

BACKGROUND

Randomized clinical trials have demonstrated the superiority of drug-eluting stents (DESs) compared with bare-metal stents in reducing the need for revascularization and major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) in low-risk patients with single-vessel lesions. Rapid DES uptake has necessitated shifting the paradigm to active DES-controlled noninferiority study models with most studies using surrogate angiographic measurements to attain adequate statistical power. No previous prospective trial has specifically compared a new DES with an active-control DES in a high-risk patient population using primary clinical end points.

OBJECTIVE

COSTAR II is designed to compare use of the investigational Costar stent (Conor MedSystems, Palo Alto, CA) with the Taxus (Boston Scientific, Maple Grove, MN) stent in single- and multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention. The primary end point is the clinical composite of MACE at 8 months supported by consistent results in the evaluation of 8-month MACE rates in the single- and multivessel cohorts and of in-segment late loss in a small angiographic substudy at 9 months.

METHODS

A total of 1700 patients, 50% with single-vessel and 50% with multivessel disease, are randomized in a 3:2 ratio to receive either Costar or Taxus stent(s) in this prospective, multicenter, noninferiority study design. Because no prior data were available to determine control multivessel MACE rates, an imputed placebo statistical analysis plan incorporating a variable delta based on actually observed control DES MACE rates will be implemented. The results of COSTAR II will provide information about a novel coronary stent device as well as unique data regarding both control and test DES use in more complex "real-world" patients.

Predictors of death or myocardial infarction during follow-up after coronary stenting with the sirolimus-eluting stent. Results from the prospective multicenter German Cypher Stent Registry

BACKGROUND

Drug-eluting coronary stents are the most recent "breakthrough" technology in interventional cardiology. Whereas risk factors influencing restenosis and need for target vessel revascularization are well known, risk factors for dying or developing a myocardial infarction (MI) after drug-eluting coronary stent implantation need to be evaluated yet.

METHODS

We evaluated data from the German Cypher Stent Registry.

RESULTS

From April 2002 to December 2004, 7445 patients at 122 hospitals, who received at least one sirolimus-eluting stent during percutaneous coronary intervention, were included. Complete follow-up at a median of 6.6 months (quartiles 6.1-8.1 months) was available in 6755 patients (91%). Death occurred in 1.8% (120/6755) of patients, nonfatal MI in 2.3% (156/6635), and death or MI in 4.1% (276/6755) of patients. Independent predictors of death or MI were initial presentation with ST-elevation MI or non-ST-elevation MI (OR [odds ratio] 2.21, 95% CI 1.66-2.95, P < .0001), cardiogenic shock (OR 3.05, 95% CI 1.67-5.55, P = .0003), renal insufficiency (OR 1.74, 95% CI 1.24-2.44, P = .0017), reduced left ventricular function (OR 1.74, 95% CI 1.21-2.50, P = .0027), age (per decade) (OR 1.19, 95% CI 1.05-1.36, P = .0058), diabetes mellitus (OR 1.39, 95% CI 1.05-1.84, P = .0183), 3-vessel disease (OR 1.32, 95% CI 0.99-1.77, P = .043), and prior MI (OR 1.35, 95% CI 1.01-1.80, P = .0468), whereas interventional and lesion characteristics showed no significant association.

CONCLUSIONS

These results demonstrate that the most powerful predictors of death or MI after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation during percutaneous coronary intervention are presentation with an acute coronary syndrome, impaired left ventricular ejection fraction, and conventional risk factors for coronary heart disease. Interventional and lesion characteristics do not play a major role.

Clinical impact of functional testing strategy among stented and non-stented patients: insights from the ROSETTA Registry

The clinical utility of routine functional testing following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) among patients with and without coronary stenting is unclear. We established an international registry to evaluate the functional testing strategies following successful PCI. Among patients treated with stents, adverse cardiovascular outcomes were similar between those who underwent routine or clinically-driven functional testing. Conversely, among those who were not treated with stents, the rate of death, myocardial infarction or unstable angina was lower than those who underwent routine functional testing (14.8% vs. 6.6%; P=0.033). Our study suggests that routine functional testing may be beneficial to patients not treated with stents.

BACKGROUND

The role of routine functional testing following successful PCI is unclear. By improving patient outcomes with coronary stenting, the value of such a strategy may diminish.

HYPOTHESIS

To determine the clinical utility of routine functional testing following PCI between patients with and without stenting.

METHODS

The routine versus selective exercise testing after angioplasty (ROSETTA) Registry was established to evaluate the utilization of functional testing following PCI. Use of functional testing, either routine or selective (clinically-driven), was left to the discretion of the attending physician.

RESULTS

Of 791 patients enrolled, 462 (58%) underwent coronary stenting. Stented patients were less likely to suffer from concomitant diseases but had more complex angiographic morphological characteristics. Between the groups of patients with and without stents, there was no difference in the proportion of patients undergoing routine functional testing (24% vs. 36%) or subsequent cardiac procedures (18.4% vs. 16.0%). Among patients with stents, outcomes at 6 months were similar between the groups undergoing routine and selective functional testing, including death (0% vs. 1.7%), myocardial infarction (0.9% vs. 2.0%), unstable angina (9.9% vs. 13.7%), repeat angiography (16.2% vs. 16.9%) and revascularization procedures (11.7% vs. 10.8%). However, among non-stented patients, selective functional testing was associated with a higher occurrence of death, myocardial infarction or unstable angina (14.8% vs. 6.6%; P=0.033). There was also no difference in the rates of repeat coronary angiography or revascularization procedures between these two strategies.

CONCLUSION

Although routine functional testing has little impact on outcomes among patients treated with coronary stents, non-stented patients may derive particular benefit.

Restenosis detected by routine angiographic follow-up and late mortality after coronary stent placement

BACKGROUND

Routine 6-month follow-up angiography (FU angio) is the most sensitive tool to detect restenosis. Thus, FU angio protocols have been a pivotal part of trials on long-term efficacy of stents. However, it is unclear if such protocols supply data relevant for the prognosis of individual patients. The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of angiographic restenosis detected by FU angio on late mortality after coronary stent placement.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We analyzed 2272 consecutive patients with successful stent placement performed from May 1992 through December 1996. All patients were scheduled for 6-month FU angio and contacted again after 4 years. FU angio was performed in 1958 patients. Of those, 557 patients (28.4%) had restenosis. After 4 years, 8.8% of patients with restenosis died, compared to 6.0% without (P =.02). There were several significant differences in clinical and angiographic characteristics between the 2 groups. In a multivariate analysis including those characteristics plus restenosis, only older age and restenosis were independent risk factors for late mortality. In patients with severe restenosis (>75% of lumen diameter; n = 231), late mortality was 7.6% in those with target vascular revascularization, compared to 14.9% without (P = not significant).

CONCLUSIONS

In this analysis, mortality 4 years after stent placement was higher in patients with angiographic restenosis. Restenosis was an independent risk factor for late mortality, with a potential benefit after target vessel revascularization in severe restenoses. These data suggest that routine FU angio after stenting provides data relevant for long-term prognosis of patients.

Long-term outcome of patients with silent versus symptomatic ischemia six months after percutaneous coronary intervention and stenting

OBJECTIVES

We sought to evaluate the incidence of silent ischemia versus symptomatic ischemia six months after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and its impact on prognosis and to test the utility of myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT), or MPS, for risk stratification in these patients.

BACKGROUND

Silent ischemia is frequent after PCI. However, little is known about silent ischemia and long-term outcome after PCI and stenting.

METHODS

In 356 consecutive patients with successful PCI and stenting and follow-up MPS after six months, long-term follow-up (4.1 +/- 0.3 years) was performed. The MPS images were interpreted by defining summed stress, rest, and difference scores (summed difference score [SDS] = extent of ischemia) and related to symptoms and outcome. Critical events included cardiac death, myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularization.

RESULTS

Eighty-one patients (23%) had evidence of target vessel ischemia, which was silent in 62%. The only independent predictor of silent ischemia was SDS (odds ratio 0.64, p = 0.001). During follow-up, 67 critical events occurred. For patients with an SDS of 0, 1-4, and >4, the critical event rates were 17%, 29%, and 69%, respectively. Similarly, patients without ischemia, silent ischemia, and symptomatic ischemia had 17%, 32%, and 52% of critical events, respectively. Diabetes (relative risk 1.98, p = 0.03) and SDS (relative risk 1.2, p < 0.001) were independent predictors of critical events. The MPS image added incremental information for the prediction of critical events.

CONCLUSIONS

Six months after PCI and stenting, 23% of patients had target vessel ischemia, which was silent in 62%. Silent ischemia predicted a worse outcome than did no ischemia and tended to have a better outcome than symptomatic ischemia. This was closely related to the extent of ischemia. The SDS added incremental value to pre-scan findings with respect to diagnosis and prognosis, indicating the utility of MPS for risk stratification after PCI and stenting.

Clinical and angiographic factors associated with asymptomatic restenosis after percutaneous coronary intervention

BACKGROUND

Angiographic restenosis after percutaneous coronary interventional procedures is more common than recurrent angina. Clinical and angiographic factors associated with asymptomatic versus symptomatic restenosis after percutaneous coronary intervention were compared.

METHODS AND RESULTS

All patients with angiographic restenosis from the BENESTENT I, BENESTENT II pilot, BENESTENT II, MUSIC, WEST 1, DUET, FINESS 2, FLARE, SOPHOS, and ROSE studies were analyzed. Multivariate analysis evaluated 46 clinical and angiographic variables, comparing those with and without angina. The 10 studies recruited 2690 patients who underwent percutaneous revascularization and 6-month follow-up angiography (86% of those eligible). Restenosis (>/=50% diameter stenosis) occurred in 607 patients and was clinically silent in 335 (55%). Male sex (P=0.008), absence of antianginal therapy with nitrates (P=0.0002) and calcium channel blockers (P=0.02) at 6 months, greater reference diameter after the procedure (P=0.04), greater reference diameter at follow-up (P=0.004), and lesser lesion severity (percent stenosis) at 6 months (P=0.0004) were univariate predictors of asymptomatic restenosis. By multivariate analysis, only male sex (P=0.04), greater reference diameter at follow-up (P=0.002), and lesser lesion severity at 6 months (P=0.0001) were associated with restenosis without angina.

CONCLUSIONS

Approximately half of patients with angiographic restenosis have no symptoms. The only multivariate predictors of silent restenosis at 6 months were male sex, greater reference diameter at follow-up, and lesser lesion severity on follow-up angiography.

Influence of planned six-month follow-up angiography on late outcome after percutaneous coronary intervention: a randomized study

OBJECTIVES

The goal of this research was to study the effect of planned angiography on late clinical outcome after percutaneous coronary intervention.

BACKGROUND

It is still largely unknown whether planned follow-up angiography after coronary angioplasty influences late outcome.

METHODS

Randomization assigned 527 patients to clinical follow-up alone and 531 to clinical and six-month angiographic follow-up. The effect of planned angiography on clinical outcome at one and three years after coronary angioplasty was studied.

RESULTS

The two groups were well matched. At one year, more events occurred in the angiographic group than in the clinical group: 122 (23.2%) versus 88 (16.7%) (p = 0.01). While the incidence of death or myocardial infarction (MI) was similar at one year, the revascularization rate was higher in the angiographic group: 113 (21.3%) versus 67 (12.7%) (relative risk = 1.7, 95% confidence interval: 1.3 to 2.3, p = 0.0003). At three years, still more events had occurred in the angiographic group (146 [34.5%] vs. 114 [26.3%], p = 0.03). More reinterventions did not improve late survival. However, there was a nonsignificant reduction in MI (7 [1.3%] vs. 13 [2.5%], p = NS) and a significant improvement in functional class at the end of follow-up (freedom from angina 81% vs. 74%, p = 0.03). The effect of follow-up angiography on the reintervention rate was similar for stented and nonstented patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Planned follow-up angiography to evaluate the late results of coronary intervention led to a 1.7 times higher reintervention rate. This effect was similar for stented and nonstented patients. More reinterventions did not improve survival but tended to reduce the incidence of MI and led to a significantly better functional class at follow-up.

[In hospital and mid-term outcome of patients with NIR stent implantation: multicenter ESPORT-NIR registry]

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Despite improvements in the results and techniques of catheter-based revascularization, few studies have evaluated the clinical results of the application of new stent designs. We describe the in-hospital and mid-term outcome of patients undergoing a stent NIR implantation.

PATIENTS AND METHOD

At least 1 Stent NIR was implanted in 1.004 patients (1.136 lesions) recruited from 50 centers in an international, multicenter, prospective, registry (Spain and Portugal NIR stent registry). Inclusion criteria were objective coronary ischemia related to a severe de novo lesion or first restenosis in native vessels with a reference diameter >= 2.75 mm. The primary end-point was the incidence of major adverse cardiac events within the first 7 months of follow-up.

RESULTS

The mean age of the patients was 60 years and 82% were male. Angioplasty was indicated due to unstable angina in 61% of the cases. Stent implantation was successfully achieved in 99.6%. Clinical success (angiographic success without in-hospital major events) was achieved in 98.6% of patients. The rate of angiographic restenosis (> 50% stenosis narrowing) was 16% (CI 95%; 11.7-21.2). The accumulated major cardiac adverse event rate at seven months of follow-up was 8.7%: death (0.9%), acute myocardial infarction (1.2%) and target lesion revascularization (6.6%).

CONCLUSION

In the wide setting of the population included in the ESPORT-NIR registry, stent NIR implantation was a highly effective therapy with a good mid-term clinical and angiographic outcome.

Long-term outcome after coronary stenting

The present review assesses the data on long-term outcome after coronary stenting. Histological, angiographical and intravascular imaging data have shown that the insertion of stents constitutes only a transient stimulus to lumen renarrowing, that this process is almost complete at 6 months and that a certain degree of neointima regression is also possible after this time. Clinical data have confirmed the sustained benefit of stenting in the long term. Careful selection of optimal stent designs and application of the recent advances in adjunctive pharmacological therapy are currently effective strategies to improve both short-and long-term results with coronary stenting. However, further efforts are needed and are ongoing to combat restenosis, a process that counters the excellent short-term results of stenting in the long term.

Does angiography six months after coronary intervention influence management and outcome? Benestent II Investigators

OBJECTIVES

This study was performed to assess whether angiography six months after coronary balloon angioplasty or stent implantation has an influence on clinical management and one-year outcome.

BACKGROUND

The Benestent II study randomized 827 patients to balloon angioplasty or stent implantation. A subrandomization was undertaken allocating patients to six-month clinical follow-up (CF) or clinical and angiographic follow-up (AF).

METHODS

Seven hundred and six patients (349 CF and 357 AF) had no intercurrent angiography, so that restenosis and disease progression elsewhere remained unknown until the time of six-month follow-up. These two groups, which were well matched at enrolment, were compared with respect to symptoms, medication and major cardiac events defined as death, myocardial infarction and need for revascularization at six and 12 months.

RESULTS

At six-month follow-up, 53 (15%) of the CF and 76 (21%) of the AF patients had stable angina (p = 0.041), while 5 (1%) and 4 (1%) had symptoms of unstable angina. At 12-month follow-up, 44 (13%) patients in both groups had stable angina, and only 1 patient in the CF group had unstable angina. Seventy-seven patients (27 CF and 50 AF; p < 0.01) had major cardiac events between 6 and 12 months. Of the 349 patients in the CF group, 21 underwent repeat percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty or coronary artery bypass graft surgery between 6 and 12 months, compared with 44 of the 357 patients in the AF group (relative risk 2.05 [1.24 to 3.37], p = 0.003).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients who had AF six months after balloon angioplasty or stent implantation experienced more repeat revascularization procedures than those who had CF. They also had significantly more angina at six-month follow-up but this may be due to bias.