Economics and cost-effectiveness in evaluating the value of cardiovascular therapies. Evaluation of the cost-effectiveness of coronary stenting: a societal perspective

Cost-effectiveness of Colorectal Cancer Screening and Treatment Methods: Mapping of Systematic Reviews

OBJECTIVE

Due to extensive literature on colorectal cancer and their heterogeneous results, this study aimed to summarize the systematic reviews which review the cost-effectiveness studies on different aspects of colorectal cancer.

METHODS

The required data were collected by searching the following key words according to MeSH: "colorectal cancer," "colorectal oncology," "colorectal carcinoma," "colorectal neoplasm," "colorectal tumors," "cost-effectiveness," "systematic review," and "meta-analysis." The following databases were searched: PubMed, Cochrane, Google Scholar, and Scopus. Two reviewers evaluated the articles according to the checklist of "assessment of multiple systematic reviews" (AMSTAR) tool.

RESULTS

Finally, eight systematic reviews were included in the study. The Drummond checklist was mostly used for assessing the quality of the articles. The main perspective was related to the payer and the least was relevant to the social. The majority of the cases referred to sensitivity analysis (in 76% of the cases) and the lowest point also was allocated to discounting (in 37% of cases). The Markov model was used most widely in the studies. Treatment methods examined in the studies were not cost-effective in comparison with the studied units. Among the screening methods, computerized tomographic colonography and fecal DNA were cost-effective. The average score of the articles' qualities was high (9.8 out of 11).

CONCLUSIONS

The community perspective should be taken into consideration at large in the studies. It is necessary to pay more attention to discounting subject in studies. More frequent application of the Markov model is recommended.

Cost-effectiveness of lung cancer screening and treatment methods: a systematic review of systematic reviews

BACKGROUND

Due to extensive literature in the field of lung cancer and their heterogeneous results, the aim of this study was to systematically review of systematic reviews studies which reviewed the cost-effectiveness of various lung cancer screening and treatment methods.

METHODS

In this systematic review of systematic reviews study, required data were collected searching the following key words which selected from Mesh: "lung cancer", "lung oncology", "lung Carcinoma", "lung neoplasm", "lung tumors", "cost- effectiveness", "systematic review" and "Meta-analysis". The following databases were searched: PubMed, Cochrane Library electronic databases, Google Scholar, and Scopus. Two reviewers (RA and A-AS) evaluated the articles according to the checklist of "assessment of multiple systematic reviews" (AMSTAR) tool.

RESULTS

Overall, information of 110 papers was discussed in eight systematic reviews. Authors focused on cost-effectiveness of lung cancer treatments in five systematic reviews. Targeted therapy options (bevacizumab, Erlotinib and Crizotinib) show an acceptable cost-effectiveness. Results of three studies failed to show cost-effectiveness of screening methods. None of the studies had used the meta-analysis method. The Quality of Health Economic Studies (QHES) tool and Drummond checklist were mostly used in assessing the quality of articles. Most perspective was related to the Payer (64 times) and the lowest was related to Social (11times). Most cases referred to Incremental analysis (82%) and also the lowest point of referral was related to Discounting (in 49% of the cases). The average quality score of included studies was calculated 9.2% from 11.

CONCLUSIONS

Targeted therapy can be an option for the treatment of lung cancer. Evaluation of the cost-effectiveness of computerized tomographic colonography (CTC) in lung cancer screening is recommended. The perspective of the community should be more taken into consideration in studies of cost-effectiveness. Paying more attention to the topic of Discounting will be necessary in the studies.

Economic impact of drug-eluting stents on hospital systems: a disease-state model

BACKGROUND

Drug-eluting intracoronary stents decrease restenosis and later revascularization. The US Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), recognizing the financial and clinical impact of this technology, recently proposed accelerated reimbursement to hospitals.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A disease state-transition computer model simulated the clinical and economic consequences to hospitals of drug-eluting stents over 5 years. Model parameters combined information from a longitudinal clinical database, a hospital cost-accounting system, and a survey instrument. Simulations were repeated 1000 times for each set of parameters. With 85% of stent procedures shifted to drug-eluting stents in the first year of availability, the mean number of repeat revascularizations dropped by 60.4% at year 5. With no changes in reimbursement policy, a hospital with a catheterization laboratory volume of 3112 patients yearly converted from a 2.01 million dollars (M) annual profit to an 8.10 M dollars loss in the first year (95% CI 8.09 M dollars to 8.12 M dollars) and 8.7 M dollars annual losses in later years. This represented an overall change in cash flow of 55.71 M dollars (95% CI 55.66 M dollars to 55.76 M dollars) away from the hospital over 5 years. The incremental reimbursement proposed by HHS reduced this loss to 4.75 M dollars in the first year and to 5.6 M dollars annually thereafter. In sensitivity analyses, the conversion of patients from bypass surgery to drug-eluting stents was the largest driver of overall cash flow shifts.

CONCLUSIONS

Although Medicare has proposed to increase reimbursement to ease the impact of drug-eluting stents on hospitals, this increase will not totally offset the costs.

Long-term resource use and cost of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty versus stenting in the elderly: a retrospective claims data analysis

OBJECTIVE

Although the benefits of coronary stenting have been demonstrated in several large clinical trials, controversy remains as to whether stenting results in long-term cost savings compared to percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA). The objective of this study was to evaluate the resource use and cost (Medicare payment) of PTCA versus bare stent in actual practice over a 2-year period.

METHODS

The data for this study came from the 1996 through 1998 Standard Analytic Files that contain 5% of Medicare claims. The rates of repeat revascularization procedures and hospitalizations were reported at 1 and 2 years. Costs associated with inpatient admission, outpatient procedures, physician services, skilled nursing facility admissions, and home health-care services were included to perform a comprehensive assessment. Regression analysis was performed to test for cost differences controlling for case-mix variation between the patient groups.

RESULTS

The selection process yielded 3782 PTCA patients and 2690 stent patients for analysis. The rate of revascularization was 26.7% for the PTCA group and 22.2% for the stent group at 2 years. The mean total cost for the initial procedure was 13,724 dollars for PTCA and 15,021 dollars for stenting. At 2 years, the total cumulative cost was 32,654 dollars for the PTCA group and 32,102 dollars for the stent group, a difference that was not statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

Although the difference in the rate of repeat revascularization procedures between PTCA and stenting is not as large as those reported in clinical trials, bare stents are cost-neutral when compared to PTCA for the Medicare population.

A break-even price calculation for the use of sirolimus-eluting stents in angioplasty

BACKGROUND

One of the major complications of angioplasty is the early occurrence of restenosis requiring a repeat procedure. When bare-metal stents are used, clinical restenosis results in a repeat procedure in 10% to 15% of cases. Based on the results of an international, randomized clinical trial, the use of sirolimus-eluting stents reduces this risk.

OBJECTIVES

The aims of this study were to calculate the theoretical break-even price for sirolimus-eluting stents in France, the Netherlands, and the United States, and to determine the additional health care cost per patient.

METHODS

The break-even price was calculated by adding the savings resulting from a 15% decrease in the rate of clinical restenosis to the price of bare-metal stents. Costs were computed from the viewpoint of the health care system, exclusive of other societal costs.

RESULTS

The break-even prices were 1291 Euro to 1489 Euro in France, 2028 Euro in the Netherlands, and 2708 Euroin the United States (1.00 Euro = 1.00 US dollar in purchasing power parity). These results indicate that the commercial price of sirolimuseluting stents will increase hospital spending for patients undergoing angioplasty by 17% to 55% per patient.

CONCLUSION

This additional cost to the health care system should be discussed in view of possible productivity savings and improved quality of life for patients.

[Direct Stenting without Predilation: a Single-Center Experience with 1,000 Lesions]

INTRODUCTION

Direct stenting has been shown to save costs, procedural time, radiation, and contrast use. We analyze the results of direct stenting in daily practice.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the interventions in the first 1,000 lesions that were treated with direct stenting at our center. Primary success, dissection, need for additional dilation, embolism, stent loss, and side branch occlusion were the variables assessed.

RESULTS

Direct stenting was attempted in 1,000 lesions in 784 patients (age 63 11 years, females 21%, diabetes 37%). Primary or rescue angioplasty was performed in 8%. One or more thrombi were found in 16%, bifurcation in 9%, calcification in 5%, angulation in 2.3%, and tortuosity in 3.2%. The reference diameter was 3.0 0.5 mm. The primary success rate was 93.1%. Failure of direct stenting (6.9%) was associated with the circumflex artery in 38%, calcification in 26%, angulation in 22%, and tortuosity in 31%. In 39 lesions, additional dilation with different balloons was required. Additional stenting was required for dissection in 40 lesions and secondary to incomplete coverage of the lesion in 27. Thrombus embolism occurred in 7 lesions, 6 of them with a previously visible thrombus and one in a vein graft. Stent embolisms occurred in 6 cases, 4 of which were retrieved. Four side branches became occluded, but 2 of them were recovered at the end of the procedure.

CONCLUSIONS

Direct stenting is a safe technique with low percentage of dissection, need for postdilation, thrombus embolism, and side br